PIL - Writ of Mandamus

PIL - Writ of Mandamus
S.O.S e - Voice For Justice - e-news weekly

Spreading the light of humanity & freedom
Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.11..Issue.18........02/05/2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 , HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State
.....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others
....Respondents
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION

OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF
MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the Petitioner above
named.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1.
Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders
will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly
hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political
squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston
made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of
India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been
proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives , police ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the
category of churchills men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
2.
Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was
denied citing unavailability. If at all information is not truly available , why didnt
the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of
Law , Justice , Respective High Courts , etc.
3.
Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each
employee including judges. If not on what basis they give promotions , transfers ,
salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR can give infor mation about
guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking that person to share infor mation ?
4.
If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put
behind bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for investigation to prosecute that
petty criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running
into tens of pages sometimes even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the
very same police & judge themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to national
security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up , WHY ? Are
Judges & Police above Law ? Is Judges MAFIA at play ?
5.
The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes.
Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to previous RTI Appeals
also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes
by covering up judges & their crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a
single piece meal a day , we lower middle class people toiling hard to earn a few
hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to JUDGEs
that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money , from
taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties properly.
2. Question(s) of Law:
Are Judges above Law & can go scot free ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , free expression & protection to life & liberty.
4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED
IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state
legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY
REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING
QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY
ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL
ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF
FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
& HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC
INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO
APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE ,
ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY
CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumbblind ,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up
,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,
RTI & Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme

Court of India , New Delhi to answer the following questions in public interest , for
safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend
anti-nationals , criminals within the judiciary & police. Judges are not superior
human beings , some of them have even became judges through devious means
other than merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing salary & perks from
public exchequer and accountable to public as any other common man is.
We salute our freedom fighters , military personnel & martyrs for all the sacrifices
made by them. Let us build a strong , Secular , Democratic India by getting rid off
few corrupt elements , anti nationals , traitors among public servants , among
judiciary & among police who are greater threat to Indias unity & integrity than
Pakistani terrorists or chinese military.
Information input forms part of process of ones expression. Ones expression in

any forms written , oral , etc becomes information input to the opposite person , in
turn he expresses his reply. Information & Expression are inseparable parts & form
lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic
fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a persons
right to expression is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also are
violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.
In a democracy , people have a right to know how the public servants are
functioning. However till date public servants are hiding behind the veil of Officials
Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created by british to suppress native
indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption , crimes ,
mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public
servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI
purview & bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.
Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India ,
DG & IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were
answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites .
the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to
millions of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of Indian judges ,
police & public servants . The information we sought would expose the traitors ,
anti-nationals , criminals in public service. The information we are seeking are no
defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the antinationals , traitors in the public service & strengthens our national security ,
national unity & integrity.
Please read RTI First Appeal to following public authorities :
1.
RTI Appellate Authority , O/O Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India ,
New Delhi.
2.
RTI Appellate Authority , o/o RBI Governor , RBI HQ , Mumbai
3.
RTI Appellate Authority , o/o Chief Minister , Government of Karnataka ,
Vidhana Soudha , Bangalore.
4.
RTI Appellate Authority , BSNL Corporate office , New Delhi.
Hereby , i do request the honourable supreme court of india , for a Supreme Court
monitored CBI Enquiry into this whole issue as karnataka police are helpless ,
they don't have legal powers to prosecute high & mighty , constitutional
functionaries. They have not even enquired the guilty VVIPs even once however
Under pressure from higher-ups they repeatedly called me the complainant to
police station took statements from me all for closing the files.
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL
for : writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants
in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india &
other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting
them to consider those as PILs. But none of them were admitted , even
acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See How duty conscious ,our judges
are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens ,
commonmen & see how careless our judges are towards anti national crimes ,
crimes worth crores of rupees.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by
courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of
the present petition.
PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a
PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public
servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed
necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER
PRAY.
FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
Date : 22nd April 2015
Place : Mysuru India
Enclosed :
RTI First Appeal to following public authorities :
1.
RTI Appellate Authority , O/O Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India ,
New Delhi.
2.
RTI Appellate Authority , o/o RBI Governor , RBI HQ , Mumbai
3.
RTI Appellate Authority , o/o Chief Minister , Government of Karnataka ,
Vidhana Soudha , Bangalore.
4.
RTI Appellate Authority , BSNL Corporate office , New Delhi.
To ,
RTI Appellate Authority ,
O/O Chief Justice of India ,
Supreme Court of India ,
New Delhi.
APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.
ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.
Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied
citing unavailability. If at all information is not truly available , why didnt the CPIO
TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law ,
Justice , Respective High Courts , etc.
If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind
bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for investigation to prosecute that petty
criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into
tens of pages sometimes even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very
same police & judge themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to national
Judges & Police above Law ? Is Judges MAFIA at play ?
The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby ,
CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO
& RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by
covering up judges & their crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES
MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.

,
JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,
RTI & Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,
Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme

Court of India , New Delhi to answer the following questions in public interest , for
safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend
anti-nationals , criminals within the judiciary & police. Judges are not superior
human beings , some of them have even became judges through devious means
other than merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing salary & perks from
public exchequer and accountable to public as any other common man is.
Please give following information :
Main A :
1. Please give me The address of salary disbursing officer in supreme court of

india. Salary disbursing officer will be maintaining service records of all employees
of supreme court of india including judges. These records are used for disciplinary
action , promotion , transfer of judges. If not within SCI , please give the address of
the outside public official who maintains service records of supreme court judges
and kindly compile information from him and give it to me orelse transfer my RTI
application to him.
2. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired supreme court judges with
allegations against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action /
criminal prosecution or not taking action.
3. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired high court judges with
allegations against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action /
criminal prosecution or not taking action.
4. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired district & taluk court
judges with allegations against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for
taking action / criminal prosecution or not taking action.
5. Some of the high courts are demanding higher RTI application fees than
stipulated by law. Eventhough requisite fees has been paid before transfer of RTI
application to high courts. Please give me the details of action taken by supreme
court of india against erring high courts.
6. Give me the List of petitions with date made by Shri . Nagaraja Mysore
Raghupathi alias Nagaraja M R TO SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH POST ,
THROUGH E-MAIL & THROUGH website of DPG / DARPG. Action taken or not
taken with reasons thereof with respect to each petition.
7. Please give me list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of

india , to safe guard the HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS of Nagaraja M R
editor of SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for justice. He repeatedly appealed
to SCI highlighting violations of his human rights & fundamental rights. After
appealing to SCI only editor Nagaraja M R suffered more injustices , attempts on his
life , etc , may be JUDGEs MAFIA is in deal with outside MAFIA. Police are helpless
& practically dont have power to question supreme court judges & other VVIPs. Did
SCI constitute SCI monitored enquiry committee with full legal authority to look into
the issue.
8. Judges preach too much & practice less. They give lectures , judgements
running into hundreds of pages eliciting legality, moral virtues , humanity , etc.
But cover up information leading to crimes / accountability of judges. The judges
committee like a mafia deals it within without subjecting the accussed judge to
public scrutiny & public trial. It is almost similar to a whore / bitch giving a lecture
on virginity to women. To refresh your memory , Please go through following
websites to know about facts , actual cases of crimes by judges. Please give us
information regarding action taken or not taken with reasons there of with respect
to each case mentioned in the following websites:
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges ,
9. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of
india to safeguard the human rights of prisoners , witnesses & evidences .
10. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by high courts of
india to safeguard the human rights of prisoners , witnesses & evidences .
11. Please give me the list of supreme court judges , high court judges & district /
taluk judges (both serving & retired) who received favourable allotment of sites ,
etc which is nothing but a form of kick back for favours shown by judge. Please
give me the list of action taken or not taken by supreme court of india with reasons
thereof in each case.
12. Please give me the list of action taken against by supreme court of india
against CPIO & PIO of supreme court of india , who repeatedly failed to give me
information . thereby , CPIO & PIO are covering up crimes of guilty judges , violating
RTI Act & violating human rights / fundamental rights of editor Nagaraja M R
together with public.
Main B :
1 . How many judges are booked for graft , sexual crimes , crimes against women ,
irregularities , amassing disproportionate wealth , failure of duty , getting illegal
allotment of sites & other crimes since independence till date , yearwise ?
2. what action taken casewise ?
3. are the action taken similar to commoners , common people committing same
type of crimes ?
4. did all the cases handled by tainted judges subjected to review , retrial by other
honest judges ?
5. how many advocates were prosecuted by court for influencing witnesses /

evidences , for tutored / concocted evidences , etc since independence till date ,
yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
6. how many police officials / law enforcing officials were prosecuted by court for
influencing , intimidating witnesses through threats , 3rddegree torture , for
concocted evidences , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if
not why ?
7. how many police / law enforcement officials were prosecuted for lock-up deaths ,
fake encounters , illegal detention , 3rd degree torture , etc since independence till
date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
8. in how many cases police / law enforcement officials were made to pay
compensation to innocent victims who were wrongly charged , detained & tortured ,
murdered by police , since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not
why ?
9. in some cases , on appeal judgements of higher court turns down the judgement
of lower court. In how many such cases , lower court judge is made to pay
compensation to victims of their wrong judgement , since independence till date
yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
10. how many judges have defaulted in filing their annual financial returns giving
out their wealth , income details , yearwise since independence till date ? what
action ? if not why ?
11. how you are verifying the annual financial returns of judges ?
12. since independence , how many convicts have been sentenced to death by
hanging , yearwise ?
13. how many death sentances were carried out & how many are pending ?
14. how many police officials were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for
defamation , when innocents falsely charged by police were acquitted , dropped
from charges by courts ? if not why ?
15. how many lower court judges were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for
defamation , when innocents wrongly convicted by lower court , but on appeal
higher courts acquitting , dropping them of charges ? if not why ?
16. are judges getting paid from public exchequer , for their expenses on liquor /
alcohol , body massages , etc in their TA DA bill while on tour , official visits ,
official parties hosted by judges ?
17. how many appeals for justice concerning public welfare , violation of human &
fundamental rights , threat to lives / livelihood , etc were made to supreme court of
india , by nagaraja mysore raghupathi alias nagaraja M R alias myself since 1990 till
date ? appeals were made through ordinary post , registered post , e-mail & by web
through DARPG , DPG. What ACTION taken by supreme court of india with respect
to each appeal ?
18. due to negligence / connivance of supreme court judges injustices were meted
out to public & public are still suffering injustices. Crimes which could have been
prevented by SC happened eventhough brought to early notice of supreme court.
What action against erring SC Judges ? if not why ?
19. I have repeatedly offered my services to supreme court of india , to apprehend

criminals within judiciary , police & public service. What action taken by supreme
court of india ? if not why ?
20. in my legal struggle for justice , due to negligence / connivance of SCI judges I
have suffered murder attempts on my life , job losses , my newspaper closed , not
getting press accreditation to my web news papers , threats by rowdies , police ,
etc. what action against erring chief justice of india ? if not why ?
21. I repeatedly appealed to supreme court of india to permit me to appear as

amicus curie before supreme court of india & jain commission of enquiry
regarding late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. I was not permitted why ?
22. who are the judges covering-up Rajiv Gandhi assassination case ? what action
taken ? if not why ?
23. Law is one & same for all , but law enforcement & law interpretation is not
same for common people , Judges & Police ? why ?
NOTE : PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT YOUR CONTINUED NEGLIGENCE TO PROVIDE

INFORMATION , JUSTICE TO EDITOR NAGARAJA M R LEADS TO THE THREAT TO
THE LIFE , LIVLIHOOD OF HIMSELF & HIS WHOLE FAMILY. YOU ARE LIABLE TO PAY
COMPENSATION. DONT TRANSFER THIS CASE , APPLICATION TO POLICE THEY
DONT HAVE POWER TO ENQUIRE JUDGES LET ALONE TAKE ACTION. PLEASE
ENTRUST THE CASE TO TRANSPARENTLY CONSTITUTED SUPREME COURT
MONITORED ENQUIRY COMMITTEE TO LOOK INTO THE WHOLE ISSUE.
I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the
best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else
where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of
wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the
police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to
police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to
police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one
sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything
untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit
& run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the
jurisdictional police , revenue officials , District Magistrate & Chief Justice of India
together with above mentioned accused public servants will be responsible for it.
Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my
dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights ,

human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward like
hit & run cases , murder attempts , unnatural deaths , etc happens to me or to my
dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India
together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for it ,
in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as
compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the
criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army
Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears
from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , guilty Judges ,
guilty public servants & guilty Constitutional functionaries.
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR

1995-2015 .
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :
CPIO , o/o Chief Justice of India , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.
FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only
DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.
PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)
To ,
Shri. L.K. Govil ,

GM (Coordination) & RTI Appellate Authority ,
BSNL Corporate office ,

Room No .27 , IR Hall , Eastern Court Complex ,
Jan Path Road , New Delhi 110001.

public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned DOT officials fall among
the category of churchills men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters. To my previous
RTI requests & appeals they tried covering up crores worth SCAM by
transferring application from one to the other at the end by denying information to
me, Does not the DOT possess information with respect to tenders given by it to
suppliers. Is it not the duty of DOT QUALITY Circle to monitor the supplies from
suppliers ? Then who has got it ? why dont you transfer the RTI application to that
authority or ask for information from them ?
We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them.
HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /
ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE
THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS
ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND
ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING
PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST
RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR
TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE,
WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS.
M/s Karnataka Telecables Ltd , Mysore renamed as M/s RPG Telecom Ltd again
renamed as M/s RPG Cables Ltd once again renamed as M/s KEC International ,
Mysore used to manufacture PIJF & OFC telecables and supplied it to
department of telecommunications , government of india , Indian Railways and
GAIL , PGCIL of Ministry of Petroleum . DOT used to pay hundreds of crores of
rupees from public exchequer to buy these cables . There is also one more
company by name M/s Concepta Cables Ltd , Mysore belonging to the same
industrial group supplying PIJF & OFC telecables to DOT. As a public , as a
citizen of india and as a tax payer I want to know whether those crores of rupees
from public exchequer are well spent.
1.
How many times the above said companies were blacklisted by DOT ,
Supreme Court of India and other quasi judicial bodies , casewise ?
2.
What action taken by DOT & judicial bodies against the above companies ,
casewise ?
3.
How many cable kms of cable supplied by above companies , were rejected
by DOT from the field yearwise , since 1986 ?
4.
Did the above companies replace all the cables rejected by DOT & make good
all the losses , yearwise ?
5.
If not , why ?
6.
What action taken by DOT , casewise ?
7.
How many cable kms of cables supplied by above companies were accepted
on deviation by DOT yearwise ? on what basis ?
8.
Has the DOT authorised usage of recycled materials in the manufacture of
cables ?
9.
If yes , on what basis ?
10. Did DOT authorize outsourcing of cable manufacturing process by above

companies to third parties , casewise ?
11. How many cable kms of telecom cables supplied by above companies have
failed during usage within the warranty period , yearwise ?
12. Did the above companies honour warranty contract in all such cases ?
13. If not why , casewise ?
14. What action by DOT , casewise ?
15. Who maintains records of DOT / BSNL tenders given out to Suppliers
specifically with respect to tenders given to M/s Karnataka Telecables Ltd , M/s RPG
Telecom Ltd , M/s RPG Cables Ltd , M/s Concepta Cables Ltd & M/s KEC
International Ltd ?
16. How may rejections / adverse reports , deviations found in the supplies made by
above companies by DOT / BSNL Quality Circle ?
17. What action taken against BSNL / DOT officials who are trying to cover-up the
scam inspite of my repeated appeals & RTI requests ?
1995-2015 .
CPIO , BSNL HQ , New Delhi.

To ,
O/O Chief Justice of India ,
Supreme Court of India ,
New Delhi.

Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied
citing unavailability. If at all information is not truly available , why didnt the CPIO
TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law ,
Justice , Respective High Courts , etc.
If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind
bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for investigation to prosecute that petty
criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into
tens of pages sometimes even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very
same police & judge themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to national
Judges & Police above Law ?
The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby ,
CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO
& RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by
covering up judges & their crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES
MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to the honest few public
servants in public service including judiciary. However, the corrupt in public service
dont deserve respect as individuals as they are parasites in our legal system.
Still we respect the chairs they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.
All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the weblinks
mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The term JUDGEmentioned throught
includes all public servants discharging judicial functions right from taluk
magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to Chief Justice of India.
Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages & is for sale. It is a
SHAME. The persons who raise their voice seeking justice are silenced in many
ways. The criminal nexus has already attempted to silence me in many ways . If
anything untoward happens to me or to my family members , my dependents ,
Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional police officer will be
responsible for it.
Hereby, we do once again offer our conditional services to the honourable supreme
court of India & other government authorities, in apprehending criminals including
corrupt judges & police. Herewith , we once again appeal to the honourable
supreme court of India , to consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.
The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for
others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable & can be
corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students
will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished &
reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot- free under his
patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he can be legally
prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself
that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime - violations of RTI Act ,
constitutional rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public from
performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ? it gives a
booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals in public service to
committ more crimes. that is exactly what is happenning in india. the educated
public must raise to the occassion & peacefully , democratically must oppose this
criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA
OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.
Kindly go through the following articles & provide justice by giving complete truthful
information to us , by publicly answering the following questionnaire in an
unambiguous manner.
The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each

citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect & uphold the dignity ,
honour of our democratic institutions , to
protect our national integrity , to respect & protect the rights of our fellow citizens.
No constitutional authority has the right to obstruct the discharge of these duties
by citizens of India. No legal privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior
over the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF CITIZEN'S OF INDIA.
We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed those
rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India & by birth itself everyone of
us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals. To express ourselves , we need
information , data feed back , to ascertain whether we are getting equal
opportunity , whether we are getting equitable justice , etc , we need information .
so ,
basically Right To Information is an inalienable part of our fundamental rights &
human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time limit , responsibilities of public
servants up to certain extent. However the citizen's fundamental right & human
right to seek information extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act.
Hereby , we seek complete truthful information from supreme court of India , with
respect to my RTI application appeal. HEREBY , WE ARE ONLY SEEKING
ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN PUBLIC INTEREST & JUSTICE. Hereby ,
we request you to register this appeal as a PIL petition & to ascertain the stand of
apex court on various matters raised in my RTI Application , in public interest &
equitable justice.
,
Hereby , we do request PIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , PIO , O/O
H.E.Honorable President of India , PIO O/O Honorable Speaker of Lok Sabha , PIO
O/O Dy Chairman of Rajya Sabha , PIOs of Karnataka Raj Bhawan , Karnataka CMO ,
Union Home Ministry GOI and DG & IG of Police of Government of Karnataka to
answer the following questions in public interest , for safeguarding national
security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals
within the judiciary & police.
Main A :
1.
What action you have taken against judges involved in atrocities against
women , casewise ? if not, why ?
2.
What action you have taken against judges involved in land scams ,
casewise ? if not , why ?
3.
I have shown with actual cases how manipulation / fixing takes place , from
complaint filing to judicial pronouncement stage. Are the judges & police , above
law ?
4.
I have numerous PILs , RTI appeals before supreme court of india. But they
were not registered , not honoured , why ?
5.
To my legal notice / show cause notice / damage payment notice to supreme
court of india & chief justice of india , till date I have not received the reply , why ?
6.
Is it not the duty of supreme court of india to protect the life & liberty of all
Indian citizens ?
7.
Is it not the failure of supreme court of india, when it failed to protect the life
of a complainant ?
8.
By negligence of their duties , are not supreme court judges aiding & abetting
criminals , anti nationals & terrorists ?
9.
While crores of Indians are barely surviving on a single piece meal a day ,
people dying due to starvation , supreme court judges are getting salary & perks
amounting to lakhs of rupees from the same suffering public / public exchequer. Are
not those duty shirking judges ashamed ?
10. What action you have taken against judges involved in hushing up late prime
minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
11. Why the supreme court of india didnt allow me to appear before it in the said
case of late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case ?
12. Why the supreme court of india didnt protect my life , my job oppurtunities ,
my newspaper from the wrath of criminal nexus ?
13. When even cable TV journalists , web journalists are getting PRESS / MEDIA
accreditation , my web news papers , myself are not getting PRESS accreditation
since 9 years , why ?
14. Are the supreme court judges hand in gloves with the criminal nexus ?
Main B :
You have not taken appropriate action to my previous RTI requests , Numerous
appeals for justice & police complaints. You have not replied to show-cause notice
also. Your inaction has helped the criminals in manipulating & destroying evidences.
Your inaction / delay in performing your duties not only amounts to denial of
information , but amounts to violation of our fundamental & human rights , coverup of crimes , aiding & abetting criminals . The criminal nexus tried to silence me in
many ways. Is not these acts of yours a crime in itself ?
If your acts of crime cover-ups , information / evidence cover-ups , aiding &
abetting criminals , silencing a crusader is just & legal. The same type of acts of
crimes performed by other citizens will also be legal ?
Main C :
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all constitutional
institutions & to the honest few in public service. Contempt of constitutional
institutions , citizens of India is being made by the corrupt persons in constitutional
positions themselves. This is an appeal to the honest few in public service ,
constitutional positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book.
1.
does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from
vested interests , to formulate policy decisions , to raise questions in parliament /
legislative bodies or to abstain from voting legal ?
2.
why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ?
3.
just remember , the vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state
legislature & how some MLAs vulgarly behaved with Ms.Jayalalita in state
legislature , years ago. Are these type of vulgar actions by MPs & MLAs legal ? does
not these constitute contempt of the house by MPs & MLAs themselves ?
4.
all the peoples representatives from panchayath member to president
of India must read ABCD Of Democracy provide along with.since independence of
India till date , MPs & MLAs are forcing projects on people against the wishes of
people , formulating policies against the wishes of people. Are not such projects ,
government policies & Laws , undemocratic & illegal ?
5.
is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of
affidavits submitted by electoral candidates ?
6.
how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false
affidavits ? are all the violators prosecuted?
7.
are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits yearly
to vigilance authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ?
8.
affidavits ?
what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving false
9.
MLAs ?
who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs ,
10.
the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih & kin raises even
during the time of severe drought , floods , fall in prices of agricultural products ,
their companies register increase in turnover / profits even during recession , the
trusts / NGOs set up by them receive huge donations. Are all these income legal ?
Main D :
1.
we do once again offer our conditional services to the government of
india , all state governments & supreme court of india , in apprehending tax
evaders , land grabbers , corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt public servants ,
labor law violators , etc. whom the the government officials , vigilance authorities
have failed to apprehend. Why the authorities , courts , supreme court of India , are
not ready to utilize our service ? are they afraid of being caught ?
2.
the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information /
records to us in many cases. So in the issues / cases raised by us , the clause of
time bar doe not apply. Are these delaying tactics of public servants , courts legal ?
3.
why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous police
complaints made by us ?
4.
why DG & IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts to
seek legal sanction for prosecution of VVIPs ( mentioned in our complaint ) , from
union & state home ministries ?
5.
the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the
supreme court of India & national human rights commission has failed to undo the
injustices , why ? is it because it is not a high profile case ? is it because it is not hifi , does not get image ratings , TRPs ?
6.
the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites & terrorists , by
their delaying tactics & denial of information , records. What action has been taken
against such anti-national elements in public service ?
7.
how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights
Activist , Mysore (editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit & SOS e-voice for justice) to
Karnataka police , to national human rights commission to supreme court of India
till date ? what action taken with respect to each complaint ?
8.
the delay in taking action by public servants with respect to following
cases has resulted in more crimes , destruction / manipulation of evidences ,
records and more injustices to commonman. Why the authorities did not take
timely action against criminals in following cases ?
SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-
DEALS IN COURTS & POLICE STATIONS READ :
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html ,
ACCUSED Chief Justice of India
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of
,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of
CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF
INDIA http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS
reliance industry where is accountability ?
crimes at infosys campus
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
crimes of land mafia in India
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,
http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,
currency thefts in RBI Press
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,
killer colas & killer medicines of India
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,
HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale
Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP pushpa kolasani on hunger strike in
anantapur district jail Andhra Pradesh
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthiap
9.
how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper ,
immoral & illegal acts , since independence till date ? what action taken in each
case ?
10.
what action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while
copying in public examination in Andhra Pradesh ?
11.
have you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions taken by such
judges of doubtful integrity & honesty ?
12.
is it not the duty of government & supreme court of India , to protect
the fundamental rights & human rights of all Indian citizens ?
13.
why the government & supreme court of India has failed to protect the
fundamental rights & human rights of me & those mentioned in my complaint ?
14.
how many former CJIs , supreme court & high court judges have
disproportionate wealth ?
15.
Your denial of information to my previous RTI requests amounts to
suppression of evidence , hiding crimes , what action against erring public
servants ?
16.
why my previous RTI requests or part there of was not transferred to
appropriate authorities and information given to me in a consolidated form ?
Main E :
Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake
encounters ?
Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree torture on
prisoners ?
Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals &
backstabs our motherland , its national security ?
Q4. Dont the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public
welfare , law & order ?
Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants ,
industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking any action with respect
to them ?
Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional
functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing time
by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why
not subject those accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc
to ascertain truth & provide timely justice ?
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses
to take action against the rich & mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives
a complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no
evidences , witnesses. Why this double standard ?
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per
RTI ACT , the public servants dont give full , truthfull information. Still , police /
courts dont take action against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an amicus curie before jain commission
of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi
assassination case ?
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by
snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by physically
assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases & by attempts to murder
me. But no action against culprits , why ?
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police & intelligence personnel
about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ?
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not
police responsible for it ?
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses & all
parties involved , both during case & afterwards ?
Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in their
familys wealth year after year ?
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS
officer , police verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive defense
establishments , research institutes in addition to police verification , central
intelligence agencies cross-check candidates background. However is there no
background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to
national secrets ? why ?
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential
allegations that close relative of one of the front running candidates have swindled
public money by their bank , misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it
true ?
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india ,
more than half the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite these
background , GOI funded & aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring
the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has funded & aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF
, ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered
thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just & legal ? Is not
GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any compensation
to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has
funded & aided couter terrorist groups , is it right & legal ?
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained & funded
salwa judum to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents
just like naxalites. Is this action of government just & legal ?
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there
are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against innocents ,
even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people
with TADA on frivolous charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the
forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports personalities who
have links with underworld , anti national elements & attended parties hosted by
dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are
not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully knowing well the
criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms & ammunition in his
home , which were intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged
with TADA / POTA instead he is charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is
normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals
, birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ?
prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty & rich ?
Q23. Law is one & same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it
differentially between rich & poor ? why this differentiation ?
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international
criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with
15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In
consumer dispute at consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia
company stated that all its products come with IMEI number only & stated that the
product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS ,
Mysore are not theirs as it doesnt have IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they
dont have any business relationship with either tata indicom or its dealer. However
the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand
products , but doesnt have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with
tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets & cheating the public. These
mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for
criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are doing
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case
ie to file B report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in investigation
?
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to
investigate case properly , so that either the case can be closed with B report or
the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ?
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower
court , when the prosecution fails ?
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order
acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious
big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate food ,
medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like
rooms with 60-70 inmates without any basic requirements ?
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG & IG of police ,
government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at
press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to
police & intelligence personnel ?
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain
constitutional functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court
cases & can concentrate on their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesnt
cover the individual actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry
harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement / police
department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission & home
ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to destroy
evidences. Is it right & legal ?
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what
does it cover ?
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of
tainted constitutional functionaries ?
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other peoples
representatives are facing criminal charges ?
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges ,
yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ?
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have
contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons
in gulf countries , else where ?
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other peoples representatives are wanted by police in
various cases . but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are
attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any
public office before naturalization ?
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of
foreign origin ?
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin &
while they are on foreign tour , from national security perspective ?
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya
swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhis family received money from foreign
intelligence agencies ?
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that
culprit party comes to power all the cases involving its partymen are withdrawn by
the government orelse prosecution fails to prove its case & prefers not to appeal.
Just remember Bombay riot case involving shiv sainiks & others , when shiv sena
BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against its partymen were
withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just & legal ?
Q48.what damages has been done to indias national security due to mole in the
PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?
Q49. What action by the government ?
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign
countries ?
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fixups , , who suffer in jail for years & acquitted by courts upon finding them as not
guilty ?
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty
police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters & 3rd
degree torture ?
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who
were responsible for gross human rights violations , 3rddegree torture , lock-up
deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappans territory , based on justice
A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not why ?
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my fundamental duty hereby do offer my
conditional services to GOI & GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you
ready to utilize my services ?
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury ,
riots , etc. they suffer more & even their family members suffer threats from the
criminal elements. Do the government provide insurance coverage to police & their
family members on the lines of defense forces ?
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable & his family ?
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who
daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction ,
human rights ?
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of

ministers ?
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING ,
LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING
ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , liedetector test , etc under the control of police department ?
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings & subtly
insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is it right &
legal ? this happens mostly in real estate matters.
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan
during his various kidnappings ?
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco
analysis about public servants involvement ?
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about
misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme court of
India ? since 1947 till date
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible
to public ? if not why ?
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended
with their resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him any
judicial work ?
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong
doings ?
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty
judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?
Q78. how ? if not why ?
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including
the wealth in the name of judges family members ?
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn
affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what
action is initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement & meating
out injustice ?
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are
made , why the accussed judges are not subjected to tests like poly graph , lie
detector , brain mapping , etc , in the interest of justice & truth ?
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the
members of Karnataka state government judicial department house building cooperative society. Then how come , many judges including supreme court judges
are admitted as members of this society & allotted prime residential site worth
crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at said societys judicial
layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks in
judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the whole thing grossly
illegal ?
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or
state government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or
their family members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites ,
gas agency , petrol pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ?
what action ?
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd degree
torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court which is handling that
tortured persons case responsible for it ?
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges & the police
officers for committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder &
murder ? if not why ?
Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions court , has called for the candidatures to
various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no :
ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of
selected candidates along with my merit ranking for the post of peon.
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various
vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated
19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post
of peon.
Q91. when a person doesnt get adequate food , medical care while under police
custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that persons case
responsible for it ? what action ?
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners ?
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for
periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a pickpocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence & gives him 3
months sentence. What about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge
responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action against
the judge in such cases ?
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years & finally the judge finds them as
innocents & acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the
innocent has already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust
punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what action against the judge ?
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions & the actions
arising out of misuse of office ?
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges & their
personal actions as individuals ?
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges ,
constitutional functionaries supreme ?
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the
judges ?
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors
of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes scheduled caste ,
scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities & women are their in supreme
court , state high courts & subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the
accountability of judges & to check corruption in judiciary ?
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of
judiciary ?
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official
meetings , parties , at the tax payers expense ?
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in
their hotel bill & claimed traveling allowance ?
Q106. what action has been taken against selectors ie Karnataka high court judges
& newly selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in Mysore ,
Karnataka ?
Q107. when common people / tax payers & even government employees are not
getting proper health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right &
just to provide premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star
private hospitals in India , abroad , all at tax payers expense ?
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their
health , mental faculties & mental balance in the midst of all work pressures ,
emotional tensions ?
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking
public interest litigations ?
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing amicus curie in a
case ?
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an amicus
curie in late P.M Rajiv Gandhis assassination case , was not considered by the
court ?
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting
evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such cases ?
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion ,
before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy persons rights violation ?
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court ,
both during hearing of the case & afterwards ?
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police
custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?
Q118. when the corrupt police officer & government prosecution advocate together
cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to fail the case
to cover-up rich crooks , high & mighty people , what action judge takes in such
cases ?
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government
advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper & fair
prosecution of cases against rich & mighty ?
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R.
to the honourable supreme court of India ?
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like
district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers ,
etc. how the judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights
watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to
apprehend corrupt judges , are you the honourable court ready to utilize it ?
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of
India , through government of indias on-line grievance system ( DPG & DARPG ) :
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 ,
DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 ,
DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 ,
DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 ,
DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 ,
DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 ,
DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 ,
DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 ,
DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which
are available at following web pages
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw
what are the status of those appeals ?
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes rape ,
attempt to murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the
disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains
by way of royalty for books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking
round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official work , etc.
by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court , constitution of India
& citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution
of India & citizens of India ? please answer.
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemens
family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen & their families , like
preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college
admission , soft bank loans , etc ?
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par
with defense forces.
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term
, abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public
with vulgar words wrong ?
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison inmates ?
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an
innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally
acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police
personnel & pay it as compensation to victims of police failures & atrocities ?
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin
naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any
constitutional office ?
Q133. during british rule in india & various other british colonies , criminal cases
were foisted against our freedom fighters in India & other british colonies. After
indias independence what happened to those cases ? did our Indian government
close all such cases or did it continue with the prosecution ?
Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government continued with the
prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or its colonies , to face
prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST
FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as
per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI /
A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per
my rti request , he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred the
application to some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not given ,
why ? as the union home secretary has got copies of all those replies in response to
transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI
request ?
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen
how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND & prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a
secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating
prosecution witnesses , evidences & prosecution stand , totally making mockery of
justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous
such advocates in practice ?
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout
more than the Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair
person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon confidential official records ,
minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister
of India or president of India , etc ?
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the
constitution (Article 21) ?
Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators & parliamentarians by the
constitution of India?
a) Inside the House b) Outside the House
Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like
a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India
c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC
e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.
Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned
constitutional functionaries ?
a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.

b) Cover both their official & personal actions.
Q146. Are the privileges defined & codified ?
Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?
Q148. Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the
constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or
below ?
Q149. Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House of
commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and court of records
?
Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the
Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of
Lords in England ?
Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or
court and causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of
accountability of constitutional functionaries ?
Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify
the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives &
executive ? does not it amount to infringement of Judicial powers & contempt of the
court by the House.
Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional
duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?
Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the
name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of officials secret act & go
unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges
Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme court
Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges for
the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action would
be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?
Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the
legislature and Parliament out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks &
lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More
valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is above or more valid in a
democracy ?
Q157. Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax
payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks & lead 5-star luxurious
lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is
above (more valid) or a seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more
valid) in a democracy ?
Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that
vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by
performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?
Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own
cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be
judges in their own cause ?
Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a
citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?
Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect
to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?
Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the
Public Interest Litigation ? In some cases, the Public or the person representing
them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.
Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal aid ?
Q164. Communication free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why
the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of
Citizens ?
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka ,
justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental
enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just & legal ? give me the names
of accused judges & description of charges against them ?
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ?
refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high
court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on assuming
offices within hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring
judges. In such a short time no human being can study all the cases in detail , then
how come he arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+
judges facing enquiry ?
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge
without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which
happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has
the court enquired into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find
any wrongdoings?
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence
of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses & brain. That is why the acts &
sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously.
However most of the police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only
they apprehend many suspects & produce those suspects at the residences of
magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are
also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police & judges work
properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them &
to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of police & judges in drunken state legal ?
Q 172 . What action has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty
police officials who changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ?
Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district
magistrate , state ministers & central ministers who fully aided the criminals Union
Carbide official Mr. Anderson to escape law , to jump bail & flee the country
without courts permission ?
Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to
their contempt of court & for aiding a criminal to escape ?
Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed
the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ? what action has been
taken against the CJI who became an official of the trust belonging to the criminal ?
Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided
to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas tragedy ?
Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department & pollution
control board officials who have failed in their duties , inspite of earlier warnings by
journalists ?
Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the
quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal although they dont have
right to do so ?
Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief
Justice of India , state police officials , public prosecutors & Central Bureau of
Investigation officials who kept quite all along and didnt press for the extradition of
the criminal Mr.Anderson , for producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial
court ?
Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials & peoples
representatives who became part of Operation Crime Hush Up & aided criminals
responsible for ghastly murders of thousands & maiming of lakhs of hapless public
in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy?
Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt
labour / pollution control board officials HUMAN BEINGS ?
Q 182 Why police are not registering my complaint against CJI & other
VVIPS ,Even after years ?
Q 183 dont the police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal
jurisdiction to register the case against these VVIPs ? or just because the
criminals happens to be VVIPs ,they are not booked by police? If the said police
dont have legal jurisdiction to book these VVIPs , they should have transferred
the complaint to those authorities who have jurisdiction & authority to book &
prosecute these VVIPs , but not done so , why ?
Q 184 are not all these actions , of VVIPs & police amounting to cover up of
crimes & criminals ? are not these cover ups itself is a crime ?
Q 185. Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of
justice . however my appeals for justice concerning public welfare , national
security sent through post , e-mail to supreme court of india are not admitted as
Public interest litigation , why ? does not these acts of Supreme court amount to
aiding criminals , anti nationals?
Q 186 Are not the honourable chief justice of india together with the
jurisdictional police & Revenue district magistrate responsible to protect the
fundamental & human rights of people ? why the CJI , Mysore DC & Jurisdictional
Police have failed to protect the fundamental & human rights of people including
mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal
nexus Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate & jurisdictional police
are together responsible , if anything untoward happens to me or to my family
members or to my dependents the quartet Honourable Chief Justice of India ,
Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore
city & Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police station , mysore will be
responsible .
These corrupt parasites will feel , understand the pain only when they also suffer in
the same manner. Let us pray to almighty In whose Court of justice MATCH
FIXING is not there & every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these
corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.
1995-2015 .
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE FULL INFORMATION:
CPIO , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.
To ,

O/O Honourable Governor ,
Reserve Bank of India ,
Central Office Building , Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg ,
Mumbai 400 001

RBI Officials , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned public
servants fall among the category of churchills men Rogues , Rascals &
Freebooters. RBI Officials are denying me information under one pretext or the
other and covering-up SCAM worth crores of rupees.
WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS.

ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS - WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE
THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. WITH RESPECT TO CASE NO old CC34 / 1989 &
NEW NO SC436/1991 AT 21
ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE
CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE
CHARGE SHEET NO staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985
Amended charge sheet staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985
1. Why didn't you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 & 79 till the
mid of 1979 ?
2. This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good
Samaritans to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is your
inspection division working properly ?
3. why there is no security check up of officers during entry & exit
out of premises ?
4. why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of
value of bags of reissuable notes & bags of note meant for destruction
, after sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight ,
value of notes issued for sorting ?
5. Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all
the employees of those sections ?
6. why did not you take steps to preserve3 & protect respective
documents relating to such high profile crime ?
7. why didn't you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &
waited till 1983 ?
8. Why RBI has left out , so many officers ( who worked in the same
sections for more period than accused officers ) from domestic
enquiry ?
9. why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before
the court ?
10. is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested
interests ?
11. did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while
preparing charge sheet & during investigation , instead of
independent investigation ?
12. those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused
the destruction of evidences / records. During the course of domestic
enquiry / court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records
have been destroyed. Are not CBI & RBI responsible for destruction of
evidences , aiding true criminals get away ?
13. in normal times , what is the period specified in RBI regulations
for preserving old documents / records ?
14. after noticing such a high profile crime the RBI must have taken
utmost care to preserve such old records for indefinite time , for
producing before courts of law as & when demanded. But it didn't ,
why ?
15. does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,
with the criminals ?

16. RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead
of individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of
defense ?
17. RBI authorities have stated that court proceedings & domestic
enquiry are independent of each other & are not binding on one
another. However RBI authorities straight away took on record of
domestic enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn't honour
the order of same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?
18. The alleged crime was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was
framed in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?
19. didn't this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,
manipulate evidences ?
20. as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note
packet were missing , who is responsible for it ?
21. has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher
officers - S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA & others ,
if not why ?
22. is it not due to inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high
ranking managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?
23. what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefficient ,
negligent higher officials ?
24. whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the
line of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative
of law , fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become
illegal. Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?
25. as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct
any loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the
misconduct of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though
mr.G.Hariram came out clean from the court , why RBI has denied his
pension ?
26. judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over & above ,
domestic enquiry committees & judicial orders supersedes the domestic
enquiry proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court & didn't
reinstate mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?
27. even if an employee's misconduct causing loss to the bank is
proved , before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the
bank) , previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken.
But in mr.G.Hariram's case , pension was denied in full without taking
previous sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?
28. RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000
to the bank & recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was
nothing left over to recover , still RBI completely denied pension to
mr.G.Hariram , why ?
29. ideally, domestic enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should
be completed first , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court
of law. In mr.G.Hariram's case , CBI & RBI failed to prove the charges
in court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges.
To cover-up it's failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much
beyond court orders date & gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does
the enquiry officer of domestic enquiry think that he is over & above
the court of law ? is it not illegal & contempt of court ?
30. ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court

against lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But
it was not done , why ?
31. did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension
period ?
32. the undue delay in filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of
key evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste in
giving findings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central
board's sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher
management. What disciplinary action has been taken against
J.P.AWASTHI, S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF & others ? if not why ?
33. why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?
34. did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate
mr..G.Hariram , by including cancelled note vault in the charge
sheet ?
35. does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual
happenings / facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation
towards fixed innocents from actual criminals ?
36. is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of
bundled verified defective note packets ?
37. is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted
officers illegal ?
38. how come such an important evidence 22nd note packet went
missing ?
39. is it because it may point towards real criminals ?
40. as per the statement of management witness / inspection head /
expert mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been removed
from packets made into new bundles , right ?
41. as per his statement , entire certificates , seals of some asst
treasurers are there , who didn't work at all on that day is not it ?
42. does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals ,
putting some innocents seals over the notes ?
43. does it not show that , crime has taken place at verification
section ?
44. does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?
45. why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?
46. why inspection of RBI Bangalore office was not done between 1975 &
1979 ?
47. is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing
internal inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry & court
proceedings ?
48. your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are
smudged , he has stated some seal marks appears to be so & so. He has
clearly nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he
himself is not 100% sure ?
49. your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this ,
on that day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn't it ?
50. your expert says during 1975 , he didn't notice3 any fraud.
However approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no
action has been taken ?
51. why you didn't produce all records of all persons , who have
specifically worked in alleged sections , the registers of those
departments with daily activity report containing seal nos , packet

nos , bag nos , etc ?
52. are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of
innocent officers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?
53. your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not
there to prove the presence of charge sheeted officers in the alleged
sections , neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what
date , at what stage , by whom crime was committed , isn't it ?
54. is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up
officers they dislike & falsely implicating them ?
55. is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from
original criminals ?
56. why no action was taken against currency officer of 1977-79
mr.J.Mitra ? why his pension , super annuation benefits were not
withheld ?
57. what is your justification , supporting evidence , records for
picking up only three officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal
prosecution and leaving the majority of probables ?
58. why you have dropped charges against five asst treasurers ? why
you didn't even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone
legal prosecution ?
59. Is it RBI's & CBI's way of fair play & justice ?
60. as inly 5% sampling of verified note bundles are done , there are
more possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed
95% lot , isn't it ?
61. you have left out so many officers who worked in those sections,
some of whom even became management witnesses , instead of being

charge sheeted by the management, is it fair play & legal ?
62. who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the alleged bank
loss of Rs.220000 ?
63. were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted ,
dismissed & their pension , gratuity withheld ?
64. you don't have any internal statuotary records to prove that
mr.G.Hariram worked in those departments , except a currency officer's
office note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the
alleged crime ? does it not prove that this note has been concocted
just to fix mr.G.Hariram ?
65. where as you have records of other officials attendance in those
departments , but not charge sheeted them why ?
66. three officers of staff grade A daily work in three sections out of 40 officers , why
you have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of 1095 working days , he has worked
for only 223 days in those
sections , still those officers who worked for more days in those
sections are not charge sheeted why ? the approver , the management
expert witness , shift registers , V2 registers , Destruction
certificates , Form CD 55 , etc , nobody , no records were able to say
on what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they
were unable to say on what date at what stage crime was committed by
mr.G.Hariram ? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI
higher authorities to fix innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?
67. the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of
crime is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst
treasurers were joint custodians . they were not enquired & let off
why ?
68.
the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of
defaced note packets. Where as the management expert witness say

substitution of defaced notes only ? is not there difference between
loss of one number of note & 100 number of notes ?
69.
as per the normal course of duty , staff officers does not
count notes in each bundles , but they just count the number of
bundles only. Is not there chances of inserted note bundles or bundles
containing less number of notes going unnoticed ? is it not the
failure of statuotary system of work practices ?
70.
does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI & CBI
were hell bent to fix mr.G.Hariram & to shield the original

criminals ?
Questions with respect to other cases :
71.
how do you monitor the work of bank officials nominated as
directors of companies which have availed bank loans ?

72.
how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks
have invested ?
73.
how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank
officials , who work in shares investment / equity funds section ,

etc ?
74.
inspite of project reports by bank officials , over
assessment of collateral securites / value of debtor companies by bank

officials , the loans become NPAs & full value cann't be realized in
the market by selling off the assets of debtor companies also. In such
cases , what action is taken against erring bank officials who collude
with criminal industrialists for availing higher amount of loan than

permissible ?
75.
give bankwise specific figures of NPAs.
76.
give names of industrial groups / promoters whose
companies have become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them ,

before investing in new companies promoted by them.
77.
is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through
rowdies / recovery agents , illegal ?

78.
why not criminal complaints filed against bank mangers for
aiding , abetting rowdism , murdering people ?

79.
if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs.
10000 from commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of a

debtor company to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ?
but debtors of crores of rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?
80.
what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer
by karim lala telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?

81.
what action has been taken against those involved ?
82.
have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi
during narco analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are

powerful & bigwigs ?
83.
how you are controlling the illegal finance activities ,
money lending by individuals , pawn brokers & chit fund companies ?

84.
how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations ,
foreign donations by many NGOs ?

85.
how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn
brokers , individuals you have booked for illegal finance activities ?
Questions relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE

86. who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at
security press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?
87. who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for
what criminal roles ?
88. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?
89. who is responsible for installing, operating & supervising the
security set-up in R.B.I ?
90. how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are
accounted for in inward stores & while issuing for printing ?
91. how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process
are accounted for?
92. How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?
93. Who keeps physical figures & possession of goods, inventory of
all the above?
94. How the scrap paper is disposed off ?
95. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?
96.
Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the
post of stores assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?

97.
give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the
post of process assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?

98.
give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the
post of process assistants & maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the

year 1996-1998 ?
99.
is not RBI & BRBNMPL authorities created by statuotary
laws , fully funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?
100. still why BRBNMPL & RBI refused to answer my previous

information request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons
will come out of cubboard ?
101. what action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore & SBI
Overseas branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of
rupees ? if not why ?
102. give me specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused
to the bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?
103. how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing huge losses to
the banks to the tune of crores of rupees ?
104. what action taken against the RBI officials who are covering up crimes inspite
of my repeated appeals & RTI requests ?

1995 - 2015 .

CPIO , C/o PCGM and Secretary , Secretarys Department , Reserve Bank of India ,
16 th floor, Central Office Building , Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg , Mumbai 400 001
To,
Shri. Dr.Sindhe Bhimsen Rao . H ,
RTI APPELLATE AUTHORITY & CPIO ,
Additional Secretary to Chief Minister ,
Room No 236 , 2nd Floor ,
Vidhana Soudha , Bangalore 560001.

Please go through the some of actual criminal cases of land grabbings enclosed
herewith.
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned officials fall among the
category of churchills men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters. To my previous RTI
requests & appeals they tried covering up crores worth SCAM by transferring
application from one to the other at the end by denying information to me, Does
not the Revenue department possess information ?
WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE
SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL
SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION
, ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
Main A :
1.
The land encroachments & illegal buildings and its continued existence
since years is not possible without tacit , covert support of jurisdictional
revenue officials. What disciplinary action has been taken against concerned
officials with respect to each case of land encroachment & illegal buildings , case
wise ?
2.
If not , why ?
3.
Is not land AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME itself illegal ?
4.
Is not the move of government of Karnataka to legalise land encroachments &
illegal buildings , in itself illegal ?
5.
Till date in some cases of land encroachers are evicted & some buildings
violating building byelaws demolished , you could have spared them to enjoy the
benefit of land akrama sakrama scheme. Why you didnt spare them ?
6.
Is this scheme applicable for only chosen few ?
7.
Does this scheme also benefit rich people above BPL ?
8.
Does this scheme also benefit big land developers , land developing
companies ?
9.
To my previous RTI appeals to MUDA , BDA only partial information was given ,
conveniently hiding the truth. Is it not violation of RTI act ?
10. Does not hiding information about land crimes , in itself also a crime ?
11. I have shown in detail some land crimes in Karnataka. What action by
government of Karnataka , casewise ?
12. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
13. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
14. Does not hiding a land crime , embolden land grabber to commit more land
crimes ?
15. What action taken against BDA , MUDA & Revenue department officials who are
covering crores worth land scams inspite of my repeated appeals & RTI Requests ?
Main B : RTI QUESTIONS Mysore DC , COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE URBAN

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) & COMMISSIONER OF MCC ( MYSORE CITY
CORPORATION ) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised /
modified the mysore city's comprehensive city development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC /

GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision /
modification by the authorities ?
4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity
site to commercial , what norms are followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is
already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?
6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate
difference between civic amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?
7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully
violating building bye-laws no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit ,
no earthquake tolerant . what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?
9. how much of MUDA's / MCC's / GOVERNMENT's lands , sites , buildings & houses
have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each
such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has
legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through MUDA's / MCC's
resolution instead of of reallotting the same through public notification to the next
senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to
original allottee ? if not done so why ?
12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of
lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?
13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have
mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms
among them are legally authorized by MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT & how many not
? since 1987 till date ?
14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such
illegal housing societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?
15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms
& housing societies who have violated MUDA norms , layout plans , etc ? if not
why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic
amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety
of people first. MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance
as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators &
legalizing those
violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally neglected by MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT . When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents say
during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park
vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn't have a
parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down
on road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn
allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists ,
politicians , artists , etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have
benefited from these out of turn allotments by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have
violated MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally
live On MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , MUDA /
AUTHORITIES with the help of police razes down those huts & evicts the poor by
brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA , MCC
/ GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build big complexes earning
thousands of rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files police
complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a
pittance as fine. Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?
22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal
occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES
recovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?
24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals tresspassers ? if not
why ?
25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to
bidders about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?
27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the
same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers & selling
it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole
villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples.
Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing
for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such
lands. When MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about
welfare objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed ,
filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by MUDA MCC or other land
developers ?
31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how
many are created till date ?
32. in & around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential
areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the
HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the
middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as
parks , rented out
advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of
taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of
electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under
& surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise ,
religionwise ?
34. in & around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA & private
developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake ,
ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by MUDA , MCC &
other developers , housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private
real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste
generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus
disturbing the environment & creating public health hazard ? how the MUDA / MCC
is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around mysore city ?
what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report
yearwise since 1987 till date .
38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are
acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single
firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have
sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees.
Has the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial
usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands ,
is it legal ? is it within the KIADB's
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?
40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice calling for
objections before alienation of such lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA's / MCC's CDP &
KIADB's industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?
42. is the MUDA & KIADB revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers & Private companies ? on
what legal grounds ?
43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya
Bhaskar's report on land grabbings in mysore ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed
while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters
has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in
conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if not why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was
there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be
used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?
46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is
open for alienation ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's
newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees
were cheated off their dues & the private firm made huge profits. is this auction &
alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime
lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social
welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for
commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what
action has been taken by MUDA , MCC or government in such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till
date? what action taken by MUDA , MCC & government action taken report yearwise
since 1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by MUDA , MCC
or authorities , on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?
51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given
media publicity ? if not why ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC / REVENUE
officials & their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land
usage conversion authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by
MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have
sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT before
the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the sale of
leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?
Main C : RTI QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY ( BDA ) , COMMISSIONER , BRIHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
( BBMP ) & CHAIRMAN , KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
( KIADB) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has revised /
modified the Bangalore city's comprehensive city development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision /
modification by the authorities ?
4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity
site to commercial , what norms are followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT?
5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is
already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?
6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting

market rate difference between civic amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?
7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully
violating building bye-laws no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit ,
no earthquake tolerant . what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report
yearwise ?
9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings &
houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against
each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT ` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the same
through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving
notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?
12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in
reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the
procedure followed ?
13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have
mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms
among them are legally authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & how
many not ? since 1987 till date ?
14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against
such illegal housing societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?
15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real
estate firms & housing societies who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic
amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety
of people first. BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a
pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan
violators & legalizing those violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are
totally neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When public people die ,
suffer injuries / accidents say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire
exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the
complex doesn't have a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way
are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not
the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries &
deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out of
Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges ,
journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have
benefited from these out of turn allotments by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have
violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally
live On BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down those huts &
evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally
occupy BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build
big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead
regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double
standard by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?
22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are
under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT arecovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?
24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals tresspassers ? if not
why ?
25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient
time to bidders about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land
loosers ?
27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands ,
for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates from
farmers & selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate
agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole
villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples.
Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing
for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such
lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom
does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed ,
filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT or other land developers ?
31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create
new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?
32. in & around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy
residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be
under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines
runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath
HT lines as parks , rented out advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of
those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the
movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these
structures under & surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987
castewise , religionwise ?
34. in & around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT & private developers , the sewage water generated in those
areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT & other developers , housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private
real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste
generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus
disturbing the environment & creating public health hazard ? how the BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status
report yearwise since 1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around bangalore city ?
what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken
report yearwise since 1987 till date .
38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are
acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single
firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have
sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees.
Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion
from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands ,
is it legal ? is it within the KIADB's comprehensive industrial area development
plan ?
40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public notice
calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT's industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?
42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP &
INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &
Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?
43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya
Bhaskar's report on land grabbings in mysore ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed
while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters
has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in
conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if not why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was
there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be
used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?
46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is
open for alienation ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's
newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees
were cheated off their dues & the private firm made huge profits. is this auction &
alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime
lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social
welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for
commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what
action has been taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT in such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till
date? what action taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT action taken
report yearwise since 1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?
51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given
media publicity ? if not why ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT officials & their family members , who have land acquisition /
denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by BDA
/ BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have
sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the
sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?
56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA allotment
letter no: 310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.
57. why BDA didn't file police complaint to evict encroachers?
58. why BDA didn't inform the descendents of original allottee about the
cancellation of their allotment ?
59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?
60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by the
resolution of BDA committee legal ?
61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must have informed
the original allottee about cancellation of allotment allowing them sufficient time to
reply with public notice in news papers , then they should have allotted the said
house to the senior most in the waiting list. But BDA has just allotted the house to
an illegal encroacher by the resolution of BDA committee. Is it legal ?
62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request & stated that the said file
concerning this issue cann't be found ie lost . is it legal ?
63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from the record room ?
HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA PLEASE REFER THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE.
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995 - 2015 .
PIO , CHIEF MINSTERS OFFICE , GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA , VIDHANA SOUDHA ,

BANGALORE.
FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733464 for Rupees TWENTY only
Right to Information as a Human Right and Developments in India

Presentation at Sarai by Debashish Sankhari, Commonwealth Human Rights
Initiative.
Case 1: Alice lives in the tribal district of Chaibasa in Jharkhand her husband
wandered into the forest
and was trampled by a wild elephant. As per the law she is entitled to claim
compensation from the forest
authorities when she produces a copy of the FIR and the post mortem report. The
police officer at her local
police station refuses to give her these copies.
Case 2: A familiar story of the Bhopal gas leak tragedy people were not aware of
the details of the gas that
had leaked. Once established that it was Methyl-iso-cynate - when Union Carbide
was asked for the
antidote to the gas they said that it was a protected trade secret, hence could not
be divulged.
Case 3: Enron People were not given a fair chance to make representations
expressing any reservations or
opposition to the Dhabol Power project. The representations can be made only after
salient features of the
project are provided like the cost of the electricity generated, the basis for this
calculations, total expenditure,
area affected, etc. The company did not provide these details at all in the public
notification and nobody could
make any meaningful representation that could be sent to the approving authority
(the Central Electricity
Authority).
There is one common thread that runs through the above mentioned cases and
that is a
lack of access to Information. Restrictions on the free flow of information - especially
between government and citizen has resulted not only in eroding the democratic
principles
enshrined in the Indian Constitution but has resulted in the failure of government
policies
and development schemes for bettering the lot of the poor. Denial of information
has
perpetuated the political, social and economic exclusion of millions; aided in the
illegitimate
retention and abuse of power by select segments of society; facilitated widespread
corruption
and impeded the fight against poverty eradication. With the lack of access to
information,
people are unaware of the developments schemes and are completely unequipped
to engage
in informed participation in their own development even if given a chance.
Therefore,
decades of development have been lost through decision making uninformed by the
realities
of those without a veritable voice.
The concept of human development is directly linked to human rights. A rightsbased
approach demands participation in governance and development, which guaranteed
access
to information can provide.
Needless to say when Alice is not granted a copy of the FIR and post mortem report,
she
was being denied access to compensation that was rightfully hers. Due to the lack
of
information about the effects of the deadly gas and its antidote, the right to life of
the people
itself was denied. The people of Maharashtra had no option to realise their voices
against
Enron. They were not only being denied the right to participate in their governance,
and
they were kept in the dark all the while electricity was being generated at a much
higher than
normal rate charged by the other companies and the bill was being footed by a
public body.
Page 2
The right to information is a basic right that underpins good governance,
democracy,
poverty eradication and the practical realisation of human rights. Good governance
is not
achieved simply by having efficient government or even a democratically elected
government. The norms of freedom of information and the assurance of widespread
citizen
participation in public affairs and an active civil society are essential for the full
realisation of
democracy - a system of government responsive to the needs of its citizens - and to
develop
a culture of human rights and accountability. The recognition of right to information
is
crucial to achieving these ends hence the need for a guaranteed and legislated right
to
information.
World over legislation on access to information are knows as Freedom of
Information laws.
In India advocates for the issue insist on using the Rights language and calling the
legislation the Right to Information Law. This distinction may appear to some as
playing
with semantics. However, there is a very important distinction that should not be
ignored. It
must be kept in mind that Rights in general imply corresponding duties. In the
context of
the right to information the citizens right to information casts a duty on the
government to
ensure that information sought is provided. On the other hand, freedom does not
convey a
strong and clear sense of duty on the government to provide information to the
public, as
the public, in this case, does not hold a right to information.

Constitutional position
While some countries recognise Right to Information explicitly in their Constitutions
1
, in
others the judiciary has interpreted the Right to freedom of speech and expression
to include
the Right to Information. The Right to Information has not explicitly been recognised
in the
Indian constitution. However, the Supreme Court of India has interpreted through
various
decisions that the right to information is a part of the Right to Freedom of Speech
and
Expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. In addition, the
Supreme Court
of India has gone on to say that the Right to Know is an integral part of the Right to
Life
and unless one has the Right to Information the Right to Life cannot be exercised
2
.
Why a specific legislation?
In addition to recognising this right as a fundamental guarantee, it is necessary to
enact an
enabling law, which will operationalise this Fundamental Right. This essentially
means that
there is a specific need to enact legislation that will put in place a system through
which
government information can be accessed.
The Developments in India
The demand for RTI laws has been growing with time. While there have been some
significant developments at the state level, the central government has been
dragging its feet
on the issue.
In 1994, the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), started a grassroots
campaign for the
right to information in Rajasthan. Emerging from a struggle for minimum wages and
land
rights, the movement drew a clear link between the denial of rights to the persons
in the
1 South Africa, Nepal, Ghana are some of the countries that guarantee the Right to
Information as a
fundamental right.
2 Reliance Petrochemicals Ltd. vs Proprietors of Indian Express, AIR 1989 SC 190
Page 3
community, the corruption in the administration and the right to information. This
movement grew and the campaign resulted in the government of Rajasthan
enacting a law
on the Right to Information in 2000.
Prior to the Rajasthan Act, as early as 1997, Tamil Nadu and Goa became the first
states to
enact laws on Right to Information. Maharashtra and Karnataka also enacted their
respective
RTI law in 2000. The most recent entrant in this league has been the National
Capital
Territory of Delhi, which enforced the Delhi RTI Act in 2001. In 1998, the Madhya
Pradesh
government enacted a law on the Right to Information, which did not get enforced
as the
Presidential assent was denied to it. Subsequently, the government has issued
executive
orders to more than 50 government departments directing them to provide access

to
information to the people. Uttar Pradesh government has also issue similar orders
on a pilot
basis, restricting them to a few departments.
At the central level there have been several initiatives for preparing a law on the
Right to
Information. The Consumer Education and Research Centre (CERC) was involved in
preparing a Bill, as also the Press Council of India. In 1997 the central government
set up a
Working Group on Right to Information and Transparency under the chairmanship of
Shri
H.D Shourie to look into the feasibility and need for a Right to Information
legislation. The
working group submitted its report in May that year with a draft Bill titled the
Freedom of
Information Bill 1997 (1997 Bill). The 1997 Bill was modified by the government and
placed
before the cabinet which referred the same to a Group of Ministers (GOM) the
1997 Bill
remained with the GOM from October 1997 to February 2000. In July 2000, the
Freedom
of Information Bill, 2000 (Bill) was introduced in the Lok Sabha. This Bill was
referred to
the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs
(Committee)
by the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha in consultation with the Speaker of the Lok
Sabha in
September 2000 for examination and report.
The Standing Committee deliberated on the Bill after hearing the views of the
Secretary,
Ministry of Personal and Public Grievances and various individuals and organisations
working on the issue. The Committee presented a Report, which was placed before
both
houses of parliament on July 25, 2001 (Report).
1
Since then the process has once again gone
behind closed door and one does not really know what has been happening.
What should the Law say?
There is a great deal of debate on the content of the law. Civil society is agitating for
a law
that will be people friendly and will ensure that much information is put in public
domain.
Unfortunately, the laws that are being enacted are a far cry from the demands of
civil society
in India. To be a strong law on the Right to Information, the following minimum
elements
must be present:
1. Duty on the Government: Iron cast duty on the government and public bodies to
give
information to any person seeking the same.
2. Inclusion of Private bodies: Apart from the government and public bodies, there
are
strong arguments for the inclusions of private bodies as well. Today the private
bodies
1 A copy of the Report can be view at out Website, www.humanrightsinitiative.org
Page 4
also influence and affect public life in a great number of ways. This is more true now
in
the context of the on going privatisation of public corporations and the growing role
of
private bodies in areas of infrastructure and public services, like power, telecom etc.
The
Bhopal Gas Tragedy is a strong example of the havoc the activities of a private body
can
play on the lives of common people. Therefore, information relevant to public
interest,
public health and environmental safety must be made accessible to the general
public
from private bodies. Goa RTI Act is the only one in India, which brings in private
bodies under the obligations of the its RTI Act to provide information to the public.
2
3. Access as general rule: Clearly stating access to information as the rule and
refusal as
the exception is an essential for removing any doubt that access to information is
an
inherent right of the people in a modern democratic society, that cannot be denied
on
mere administrative discretion. This will mean that the government duty bound to
disclose/provide information to the public as norm and refuse information only in
defined, narrow and exceptional circumstances.
4. Minimum and narrow Exemptions: The list of information that cannot be disclosed
to the public (generally known as exemptions) must be minimal, specific and
narrowly
defined. The usual list includes categories like defence related information,
information
which can harm the law and order situation, commercial secrets, etc. The
Constitution
of India allows only reasonable restrictions to be applied to the fundamental
freedom of
speech and expression. The courts have also read these restrictions strictly and the
same
logic has to apply to the right to information as it is an accepted part of the freedom
of
speech and expression. Therefore, the law must not contain a long list of exceptions
couched in terms general enough to ensure that all kinds of information can be
refused
taking the help of the law itself. This has happened in the case of the Tamil Nadu
right
to Information Act which has all of 22 exceptions, and the Shourie draft Bill, which,
along with numerous exceptions contains an all-pervasive clause that information
can be
denied, viz, If its disclosure does not subserve any public purpose. A Right to
Information does not need to disclose any specific need. If a person must show
public
purpose every time he seeks information, it would give unlimited discretion to
public
bodies to refuse information.
Here also the debate of protection of privacy becomes relevant. The law has to take
into
account the protection of an individuals privacy. Personal information held by the
government must be exempt from disclosure. However, if the public interest in
disclosure in the public interest greatly outweighs the preservation of individual
privacy,
then disclosure should be allowed. Goa, Karnataka and New Delhi Act contain
provisions for exemption of private information subject to larger public interest.
5. Application process: The application (the request for information) process has to
be
clearly defined and a definite official must be identified and made responsible for
accepting the application and to process the same and provide the information or a
2 The new Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in South Africa dedicates an
entire segment of the
Act to access of information from Private bodies. It clearly states the right of a
person to access to
information (in certain cases) held by private bodies and provides in detail for a
person to approach any
private body and request for information.
Page 5
reasoned refusal, as the case maybe. Generally, written applications or requests are
required seeking information, but there may be legitimate cases where the person
seeking
the information cannot write without assistance or write at all, especially in a
country
where illiteracy is widespread. In this case, the law must stipulate that oral requests
should be accepted and where reasonable assistance is required to help the person
write
a request, the assistance must be provided. In this respect, the central FOI Bill puts
the
burden on the government official to reduce the oral request into writing. The law in
Goa and Delhi also take into account oral requests.
6. Time Limit for administrative response: The response time to the application has
to
be reasonable and timely. If excessive time were allowed to the administration to
reply to
the application or provide information it would nullify the requirement of timely
information. For example, in cases of urgent information requirement like in matters
of
custody or emergency medical situations etc., information delayed is information
denied
and an information giving mechanism for the benefit of the people losses its
meaning.
This kind of situation is not satisfied in most Indian RTI laws, wherein the most
common time limit is of 30 days from the time of receipt of the application for
information. Only, the Goa RTI law provides for a situation of urgent requirement of
information and it states that in cases of life or liberty, the information must be
provided
within 48 hours of the application for information. We believe that this provision
must
be incorporated in any RTI law to bring it closer to being a responsive and effective
piece of legislation.
7. Fees: Most of the time a fee has to be paid for obtaining copies of documents or
any
other medium containing the desired information from the government. This fee has
to
be reasonable and provision for waiver in suitable cases must be provided as well.
This is
especially true in a country of abject and widespread poverty. The law must set out
the
basic guideline with respect to the upper limit of the fee, as it cannot be left to the
discretion of the officials and it must be limited to the cost of processing and
making
available the information at the most. This will provide a space for the officials to set
fee
structure which will act as a deterring factor for asking information from the
government. The Rajasthan RTI Act and the Central FOI Bill, do not contain any
guideline with respect to an upper limit for the fee to be charged.
8. Suo motu Disclosures (Duty to Inform): A law on the Right to Information must
cast
a positive duty on government and public bodies to inform the public in case of
certain
projects and activities which relate to the public. This envisages giving information
without being asked for it (by an application or request for information). It must be
made mandatory to give out certain kinds of information on a mandatory basis. This
kind of information would include the organisational structure of the government
department/public body, its governing rules and manual, functions, information on

proposed projects and schemes, and other relevant information which needs to be
given
out and updated routinely. The Karnataka RTI Act and the Delhi RTI Act impose this
obligation on the government authorities. The Central FOI Bill also contains similar
disclosure clauses.
9. Independent Appeal Mechanism: The information seeker must be provided an
independent remedial mechanism to redress any grievance from the response to
the
Page 6
application for information. One core idea involved in the Right to Information is to
pry
open the administration and subject it to public scrutiny and make the government
accountable to the people. This objective is completely lost where there is a
complete
lack of an appeal mechanism or it is within the establishment itself. It is of vital
importance for the success of an RTI law for the appellate authority to be an
independent agency separate from the government, which will deal with any appeal
in an
unbiased and efficacious manner. Some Acts in India provide for an independent
appellate body like, Karnataka Act, the Goa Act, the Rajasthan Act and the Delhi Act.
The appellate body itself varies, for example Goa and Karnataka (appeal at the
second
instance) lie to the State Administrative Tribunal, whereas in Delhi the appeal lies to
the
Public Grievances Commission. In the Tamil Nadu Act, Maharashtra Act and the
central
FOI Bill, the appeal mechanism is restricted to within the administration itself.
10. Penalties: The provision for an independent appeal mechanism is essential for
providing a remedial mechanism for the person seeking information. But to deter
the
official and persons responsible for providing the information from unnecessarily
harassing, delaying or intentionally denying or providing wrong or inaccurate
information, adequate provision for penalties must be fit into the legislation. Most of
the
laws in India that have penalty clause provide for disciplinary action against the
erring
government personnel in case of delay or wrongful denial of information. The
central
FOI Bill, Tamil Nadu Act and Maharashtra Act sorely lack in this respect with no
penalty clause at all.
11. Independent Monitoring Agency: Without continued and independent monitoring
the
RTI law will become a dead-letter law. It is important that an independent agency is
made responsible to monitor and review the functioning of the law, provide advice
to
the government on all matters related to the promotion of right to information,
undertake documentation and research with respect to information management of
the
government with a view to improve the same, devise training and orientation of
government employees on the culture of openness and transparency etc. Goa and
Delhi
Acts have constituted a body with the responsibility of monitoring and reviewing the
law
called the State Council for Right to Information. Typically this body constitutes of
members from the government, representatives from the media, civil society,
business
section, etc.
12. Protection of Whistleblowers: The RTI law must contain protection for public
officials
who give certain exempted information where it is necessary to do so in

overwhelming
public interest or to disclose some serious corrupt practice, etc. This gives honest
and
alert officers the safety and assurance from fear of reprisal to come out with
information
in public interest or expose corruption and malpractice in government. All the RTI
laws
in India, except the Karnataka Act, provide for the protection of any person against
any
legal proceeding for anything done in good faith in pursuance of the respective RTI
law.
13. Publicity and Training: The law must contain a mandatory procedure for
publicising
its contents. Often, laws are passed without their knowledge percolating down
without
sufficient speed or impact and therefore fail to bring about the desired change in
the
systems. The Right to Information law must also contain a strong aspect of training
and
orientation of public servants at all levels, in order to bring about an effective
change in
Page 7
the culture of secrecy and unwillingness to part with information. There are no
provisions in any of the RTI laws in the country, which provide for suitable
publication
and awareness building amongst the people regarding the law.
Problems with the Indian Law on RTI
As it emerges from the discussion above, the legislation that have been enacted by
the states
as also the central Bill do not contain all the important components of a law on the
right to
information. For instance the Goa and the Tamil Nadu law do not contain provisions
on the
duty to provide information. The Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu laws have a long list
of
exceptions that keep out a lot of information from public domain. The central FOI Bill
is
also very week, and in certain aspects it does not even stand at par with its
counterpart in the
States. For example, the FOI Bill does not contain any independent appeals
mechanism nor
does it contain any penalties. It further fails to provide for an independent
monitoring
agency.
Neither the laws enacted by the various states nor the FOI Bill being considered by
the
central government are satisfactory, as these laws keep a large area of information
away from
the purview of the public. There is no uniformity or consistency amongst the various
state
laws that have been enacted. That is why there is a demand that the central
government must
make a law which applies uniformly to the whole country and sets out clear
procedure for
getting information
3
. It is also important for the central FOI Bill to be a strong law setting
out the minimum standards with regards to the components discussed earlier, for
example
setting out a reasonable time limit for response from administration in cases of
urgent
request for information. This will mean that the States will also have to confirm to
the
minimum standards set out in the central law and therefore, certain definite
minimum
standards will be assured to all information seekers in the country.
The process of law making itself in most cases has been non-participatory. The laws
made by
the government have been passed without much discussion or debate and without
taking
into consideration people's views on the issue. As a result of this, the laws are not
people
friendly and the common person is not aware of existence of legislation, which is
meant for
their benefit.
Conclusion
The realisation of Human Rights is dependent on a democratic society, where the
people are
empowered with information and knowledge, are able to scrutinise the functioning
of their
government and are capable of participating in a meaningful manner in the
governance of
the community. To this end, the RTI law is a tool, as it gives entitlement and the
mechanism
to obtain information from the government with which citizens can become
empowered by
acquiring a weapon to hold the government accountable, participate in governance
and
exercise their rights.
It must be kept in mind that mere enactment of a law does not mean that
government will
start implementing it in an effective manner. Civil society organisations, NGO's and
others
have a responsibility to ensure effective implementation. The same is true for the
3 Detailed analysis of the state laws can be found on the CHRI website
www.humanrightsinitiative.org
Page 8
implementation of the RTI law as well. They have an important role to play, for
example, in
using the law for the benefit of the people, disseminating information, analysing
information,
generate debate on various issues and in carrying the voice of the voiceless to
policy makers.
..DECLARATION
Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R.
Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP

WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017 INDIA
Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S - e Voice For Justice
Periodicity : WEEKLY
Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB
Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any donations ,

subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .
Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on
my websites or web news paper or otherwise.
Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.
Nationality : INDIAN
Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e clarion of Dalit &
S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated to JSS Medical College , Mysore ( Donation No.
167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at
the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be handed over to JSS Medical
College , Mysore for the study purposes of medical students.
Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e clarion of Dalit &
S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either
Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must
be handed over to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye
transplantation to the needy.
Home page :
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/sosevoiceforjustice/ ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper / ,
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice / ,
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com / ,
http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com , http://paper.li/f-1368369249
Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com
UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479
Cell : 91 9341820313
I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the
best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else
where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of
wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the
police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to
police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to
police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one
sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything
untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit
& run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the
jurisdictional police , revenue officials , District Magistrate & Chief Justice of India
together with above mentioned accused public servants will be responsible for it.
Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my
dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights ,

human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward like
hit & run cases , murder attempts , unnatural deaths , etc happens to me or to my
dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India
together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for it ,
in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as
compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the
criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army
Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears
from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , guilty Judges ,
guilty public servants & guilty Constitutional fuctionaries.
date : 18.04.2015....Your's sincerely,
place : India............Nagaraja.M.R.
Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ # LIG-2 No 761,HUDCO

FIRST STAGE ,
OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSURU 570017 KARNATAKA

INDIA
Cell : 91 9341820313 , 91 8970318202
Home page :
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/sosevoiceforjustice/ ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper / ,
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice / ,
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com / ,
http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com ,
http://paper.li/f-1368369249 ,
Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,

http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw
A Member of Amnesty International

PIL - Writ of Mandamus

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

PIL - Writ of Mandamus

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

PIL - Writ of Mandamus

S.O.S e - Voice For Justice - e-news weekly

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

Facts of the case:

Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND

Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up

SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs

JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice

RTI & Land Golmaal

Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme

Information input forms part of process of ones expression. Ones expression in

Please read RTI First Appeal to following public authorities :

RTI Appellate Authority , o/o RBI Governor , RBI HQ , Mumbai

RTI Appellate Authority , BSNL Corporate office , New Delhi.

FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Date : 22nd April 2015

Place : Mysuru India

RTI First Appeal to following public authorities :

RTI Appellate Authority , o/o RBI Governor , RBI HQ , Mumbai

RTI Appellate Authority , BSNL Corporate office , New Delhi.

RTI Appellate Authority ,

O/O Chief Justice of India ,

Supreme Court of India ,

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

Atrocities on Women by JUDGES

Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND

Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up

SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs

JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice

RTI & Land Golmaal

Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme

Please give following information :

1. Please give me The address of salary disbursing officer in supreme court of

7. Please give me list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of

2. what action taken casewise ?

5. how many advocates were prosecuted by court for influencing witnesses /

19. I have repeatedly offered my services to supreme court of india , to apprehend

21. I repeatedly appealed to supreme court of india to permit me to appear as

NOTE : PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT YOUR CONTINUED NEGLIGENCE TO PROVIDE

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights ,

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

Shri. L.K. Govil ,

BSNL Corporate office ,

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

What action taken by DOT , casewise ?

If yes , on what basis ?

10. Did DOT authorize outsourcing of cable manufacturing process by above

CPIO , BSNL HQ , New Delhi.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733463 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

RTI Appellate Authority ,

O/O Chief Justice of India ,

Supreme Court of India ,