Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

Editor s Page

PUBLISHER

ART & DESIGN

MICHAEL GROSSMAN

ROB HUDGINS

Vice President and Group Publisher


mgrossman@accessintel.com

Graphic Designer
rhudgins@accessintel.com

EDITORS

PRODUCTION

DOROTHY LOZOWSKI

JOHN BLAYLOCK-COOKE

Editor in Chief
dlozowski@chemengonline.com

Ad Production Manager
jcooke@accessintel.com

GERALD ONDREY (Frankfurt)


Senior Editor
gondrey@chemengonline.com

INFORMATION
SERVICES

SCOTT JENKINS
Senior Editor
sjenkins@chemengonline.com

CHARLES SANDS
Director of Digital Development
csands@accessintel.com
CONTRIBUTING EDITORS

MARY PAGE BAILEY


Assistant Editor
mbailey@chemengonline.com

SUZANNE A. SHELLEY

AUDIENCE
DEVELOPMENT

CHARLES BUTCHER (U.K.)

SARAH GARWOOD
Audience Marketing Director
sgarwood@accessintel.com

JESSICA GRIER
Marketing Manager

sshelley@chemengonline.com

cbutcher@chemengonline.com

PAUL S. GRAD (Australia)


pgrad@chemengonline.com

TETSUO SATOH (Japan)


tsatoh@chemengonline.com
JOY LEPREE (New Jersey)

GEORGE SEVERINE

jlepree@chemengonline.com

Fulfillment Manager
gseverine@accessintel.com

GERALD PARKINSON (California)


gparkinson@chemengonline.com

JEN FELLING
List Sales, Statlistics (203) 778-8700
j.felling@statlistics.com
EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD

JOHN CARSON

HENRY KISTER

Jenike & Johanson, Inc.

Fluor Corp.

DAVID DICKEY

GERHARD KREYSA (retired)

MixTech, Inc.

DECHEMA e.V.

MUKESH DOBLE

RAM RAMACHANDRAN

IIT Madras, India

(Retired) The Linde Group

HEADQUARTERS
88 Pine Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10005, U.S.
Tel: 212-621-4900
Fax: 212-621-4694
EUROPEAN EDITORIAL OFFICE
Zeilweg 44, D-60439 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Tel: 49-69-9573-8296
Fax: 49-69-5700-2484
CIRCULATION REQUESTS
Tel: 847-564-9290
Fax: 847-564-9453
Fullfillment Manager; P.O. Box 3588,
Northbrook, IL 60065-3588 email: chemeng@omeda.com
ADVERTISING REQUESTS: see p. 82
For reprints, licensing and permissions: Wright's Media, 1-877-652-5295,
sales@wrightsmedia.com
ACCESS INTELLIGENCE, LLC

DON PAZOUR

SYLVIA SIERRA

Chief Executive Officer

Senior Vice President,


Customer Acquisition and Retention

HEATHER FARLEY
Chief Operating Officer,
Business Information Group

Senior Vice President, Digital


Development

MICHAEL KRAUS
VP, Production, Digital Media
& Design

MACY L. FECTO
Exec. Vice President,
Human Resources & Administration

STEVE BARBER
Vice President,
Financial Planning and Internal Audit

JENNIFER SCHWARTZ
Senior Vice President & Group Publisher
Aerospace, Energy, Healthcare

n the chemical process industries (CPI), dust can present an issue


far more menacing than a housekeeping nuisance. Combustible
dust is in fact, much too often listed as a cause of serious, and
even fatal accidents.

Incidents
In January of this year, the U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB; Washington, D.C., www.csb.gov) issued its report on the U.S. Ink plant
flash fire that burned seven workers. This incident, which occurred
in October 2012 in East Rutherford, N.J., was found to have resulted
from the accumulation of combustible dust inside a dust-collection
system that had been put into operation four days prior to the accident. One of the key findings in the report is that while the dustcollection system was designed for dust collection, it was modified to
include a housekeeping function, which caused insufficient flowrates.
The CSB report notes that the volume of air flow and the air velocity
were below industry recommendations.
In 2006, the CSB issued a comprehensive report on combustible
dust hazards that was based on investigations of three major industrial explosions that occurred in the U.S. in 2003 alone. The three
incidents, in North Carolina, Kentucky and Indiana, cost 14 lives and
numerous injuries. In that 2006 study, the CSB identified 281 combustible-dust incidents that occurred in the previous 25 years and
claimed 119 lives with over 700 injuries. Since 2006, the CSB documented 50 combustible-dust incidents that resulted in 29 fatalities
and 161 injuries. These include the 2008 Imperial Sugar disaster near
Savannah, Ga., and three incidents over a six-month period in 2011
at a powdered-metal plant in Gallatin, Tenn.

Standards and regulations


What is striking in the reports about dust explosions is that at least in
some cases, known engineering controls may have been preventative. In its 2006 investigation report Combustible Dust Hazard Study,
the CSB recommended that the Occupational Safety and Health
Admin. (OSHA; Washington, D.C.; www.osha.gov) issue a standard
to prevent combustible-dust fires and explosions based on standards
already available from the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA;
Quincy, Mass.; www.nfpa.org). The CSB reiterates this recommendation in numerous subsequent reports including its most recent one
issued in January. While standards exist, they are voluntary and not
enforced through federal regulations. In 2013, the CSB designated a
comprehensive general industry standard for combustible dust as its
first Most Wanted Chemical Safety Improvement.

ALISON JOHNS

ED PINEDO
Executive Vice President
& Chief Financial Officer

A most wanted safety improvement

GERALD STASKO
Vice President/Corporate Controller

ROBERT PACIOREK
Senior Vice President,
Chief Information Officer
4 Choke Cherry Road, Second Floor
Rockville, MD 20850
www.accessintel.com

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING

Resources
In the meantime, a wealth of information about combustible dust
is available. The CSB website contains many lessons learned from
incident investigations in both report and video
format. The NFPA offers a number of relevant
standards. OSHA offers various resources, including information on its Combustible Dust National
Emphasis Program (NEP). And numerous articles,
such as the Feature Report in this issue (Prevent
Combustible Dust Explosions With Nitrogen Inerting, p. 64) help to share knowledge and insight into

this important issue.


Dorothy Lozowski, Editor in Chief

WWW.CHEMENGONLINE.COM

MARCH 2015

Вам также может понравиться