Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 40

This is certified that the

Project titled

Weaknesses of LUAWMS Management

Presented by:
Mr. Jalil Ahmed
Has been accepted towards fulfillments of the requirements for survey research in the department of
Economics, LUAWMS University, Uthal.

Research Assistant:
Mr. G. Abbas

4/24/2015

Research Supervisor:
Prof. Dr. Syed Manzoor Ahmed

Acknowledgement

"In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful" I have taken efforts in this project. However, it
would not have been possible without the kind support and help of many individuals and
organizations. I would like to extend my sincere thanks to all of them.
I am highly indebted to Sir Abbas Baloch and Dr.Manzoor Ahmed Baloch for their guidance and
constant supervision as well as for providing necessary information regarding the project & also for
their support in completing the project.
I would like to express my gratitude towards my parents & my class fellows for their kind cooperation and encouragement which help me in completion of this project.I would like to express my
special gratitude and thanks to my teachers for giving me such attention and time.My thanks and
appreciations also go to my colleague in developing the project and people who have willingly
helped me out with their abilities.

Dedication
.
I would like to dedicate this research reports to my parents that they always encouraged me and they
work hard on me to achieve my goals as they hoped on me. I am extremely thanks full to them that
they motivated me on educational fields to show my best skills and abilities to complete their dreams
into reality. I have enough words for them, just I pray that May ALLAH always blessed on them.

Contents
Acknowledgement ................................................................................................................................................................. 2
1: Chapter ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2: Chapter ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6
3: Chapter ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Sampling frame:.......................................................................................................................................................... 10
4: Chapter ................................................................................................................................................................... 11
Chi square test: ................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Correlation analysis: .......................................................................................................................................................... 18
5: Chapter ................................................................................................................................................................... 19
Tables.................................................................................................................................................................................. 19
Graphs................................................................................................................................................................................. 27
6: Chapter ................................................................................................................................................................... 34
6.1: Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................ 34
6.2: Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................... 34
6.3 References ................................................................................................................................................................. 36
Questionnaire ................................................................................................................................................................. 37

1: Chapter
Introduction

Institutional management;
Institutional management is the process of laying out plans and organizing available production
resources to run a successful organization. Institutional management can also be called strategic
financial management. Steps in institutional management generally include identifying the current
situation, identifying the desired situation and determining the steps necessary to get there. The idea
behind institutional management is to lay out a strategic plan that outlines concrete steps to
maximize company success. This process can improve business by allowing an analytical view of
how the business could best operate.

University management:
The university management system is responsible to maintain update and take actions to upgrade all
types of details such as student details, academic related reports, university details, course details,
curriculum, batch detail and other details of resource related .

2: Chapter

2.1 Literature review:

Performance management system (M.com.Final) Human resources management study by


DDI, 1997.
Study by Wm.Schiemann And Associates in 1996.
The study by Eleni T.Stavrow, Christakis Charalambous and Stellios Spillotis.
Sharmistha Bhattacharjee and Santoshi Sengupta, 2011.
The article of Javed Iqbal, Samina Naz, Mahnaz Askam, Saba Arshad 2012.
The paper of Akua Asantewaa Aforo and Kodjo Asafo-Adjei Antwi, 2012.
The paper of Jawaria Andleeb Qureshi, Asad Shahjeham, Zia ur Rehman and Bilal Afsar
2010.

3: Chapter

3.1 Background
Being the student of LUAWMS, it happened many time where I feel the need for change in attitude
of management personals towards the provision of quality education to the students. Honestly
speaking the available recent infrastructure of university is not enough and sufficient to meet the
need of modern education and unfortunately the management personals are not taking into their
account ever growing problems and issues of students such as educational and study related,
accommodation and hostel related, health and health related and so on. What I feel is how much
related to the feelings of others?, it was an ever stand by question in my mind. When I was subjected
to conduct a survey research and took the responsibility as an opportunity to explore this question,
suggest some remedies and stuck these into the sharing wall of knowledge.
LUAWMS is charted on 7th March, 2005 through Baluchistan Ordinance No. 1/2005 and inaugurated
by then-Prime Minister of Pakistan Mr. Shaukat Aziz on 30th March, 2005. It is further confirmed by
the Baluchistan Assembly vide Act No IX dated 16th June, 2010.
Lasbela University Of Agriculture, Water and Marine Sciences is situated on main R.C.D Highway
at Uthal, District Lasbela Baluchistan. Keeping in view the importance of more than 700 Km coastal
area of the province and highly cultivated land with suitable environment as well as high quality of
range lands, LUAWMS is well placed to provide highly skilled man power.
Vision
LUAWMS is a respectable seat of learning in Pakistan with special status in the fields of Marine,
Veterinary, Water, Agriculture Sciences and Social Sciences providing higher education, research,
training and consultancy services to the public and private sector, while ensuring availability of fully
qualified and skilled human resources to work at various tiers of their hierarchy. The students
passing out from LUAWMS will be equipped with knowledge, skill, confidence, enterprise built
around the latest developments for active participation in socioeconomic growth and uplift of their
respective communities.
Mission
Substantial contribution towards national economic growth and social development by providing
highly qualified and adequately skilled manpower, specially to the province of Baluchistan, in the
fields of emerging arts and sciences along with objective research in the related sectors.

3.2 Methodology:
The data were collected through primary source from the Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water
and Marine Sciences and its basic research not an applied research and the collection of data is taken
from which I have gave in references I have faced difficulty to collecting data of chosen topic which
is Weaknesses of LUAWMS Management.

3.3 Organizational structure:

The
G.Blaochistan/Ch
ancellor

Vice-Chancellor

Additional
Registrar

D.D.
P&D

Deputy
Controll
er Exam

Directer
projects
& Works

Director
P&D

Additi
onal
treas
urer

Deputy
Registr
ar
(Acad)

It
Man
ager

Libra
rian

Ass
ita
nt
En
gin
eer

Dy.
Direct
or
Procu
reme
nt

Sampling frame:

3.4 Two stage sampling:


My target was LUAWMS University overall population is 1200 sample size is 84 and its 7.08% of
total population were taken randomly from each department

3.5 Coding lexicon:


Collected responses were coding after coding lexicon the data were filed in SPSS appropriate
statistical test were used after getting results the results were interpret and then it filed in word
document.

3.6 Objective of the study:


This survey outline some emerging fundamental factors that determine whether or not the LUAWMS
be an advantage in any given educational environment within the provincial boundaries.
The survey on The LUAWMS Management System has the following objectives
1. To capture the students perception about the LUAWMS Management System.
2. To assess the impact of LUAWMS Management System for some extent.
3. To get some insight into the different effects LUAWMS Management System.

3.7 Study Research Question:


Weaknesses of LUAWMS Management

3.8 Hypothesis:
How university management effect university culture and how university management builds up
students?

10

4: Chapter

4.1 Results and Discussions:

1: Table

Table.1. shows There are seventy six male and eight female students in our sample sizes eighty four
.Female ratios is less than male because of less admission in Lasbela University of agriculture, water
and marine sciences. These results can be seen through graph 1
1.1: table

Table.1.1 shows that In our sample of 84 students, a female and36 male students are F.Scqualified ,
thirty seven male and six female student are Bs/B.sc qualified and there are 3 male and a female
student having other qualification . The graph 1.1 also shows the detail discussed above. Graph.1.1
also presents the visual picture.
1.2: Table

Table.1.2 shows There are 10 male and 2 female students are from department of Agriculture, the
eight male and four female students are from department of DVM., 12 male students are from
department of Marine Sciences, only one female and11 male students are from department of
Economics, the only one female and eleven male students are from department of Education, 12
male student are from department of English and the twelve male student are from the department
of Water resource and management. As shown in the graph.1.2
1.3: Table

Table.1.3 shows There are total 84 respondents, there minimum value is 18 and maximum value is
twenty eight years old minimum and maximum respectively. The respondents are 22 years old on
average and the standard deviation of age is 2 years.
1.4: Table

Table.1.4 shows There are twenty four male and six female students in our sample sizes eighty four,
they response that staffs behavior is good with students in university there are thirteen male students
response that staffs behavior is best with students in university, there are twelve respondents
response that staffs behavior is fair with students in university and there are 27 respondents response
that staffs behavior is poor with students in university. These results can be seen through graph 1.4.

11

1.5: Table

Table.1.5 shows that14 students agree with v/c performance and also agree with academic
management in university, the four respondents agree with v/c performance but strongly agree with
academic management in university,19 students agree with v/c performance but disagree with
academic management in university, 8 respondent agree with v/c performance but strongly agree
with academic management in university ,eleven students strongly agree with v/c performance but
agree with academic management in university, 3 respondents strongly agree with v/c performance
and also strongly agree with academic management in university,2 respondents strongly agree with
v/c performance but disagree with academic management in university, the only one student strongly
agrees with v/c performance but strongly disagree with academic management, four respondents
disagree with v/c performance but agree with academic management, 8 students disagree with v/c
performance and also disagree with academic management, 6 students disagree with v/c performance
but strongly disagree with academic management, the only one respondent strongly disagree with v/c
performance but agree with academic management , and 3 students strongly disagree with v/c
performance and also strongly disagree with academic management in university. And also there are
total 45, 17, 18, and 4 students are agree, strongly agree, disagree and strongly disagree with the VC
performance irrespective of Academic management VC performance. And also there are total 30, 7,
29, and 18 students are agree, strongly agree, disagree and strongly disagree with the Academic
management irrespective of VC performance. As shown in the graph 1.5.
1.6: Table

Table.1.6 shows In our sample thirty eight male and four female student are agree, thirteen male and
2 female respondents are strongly agree, 21 male and two female students are disagree ,no one
female but four male respondent are strongly disagree with the teaching method of teachers. The
Graph 1.6 presents the visual of picture of detail discussed below.
1.7: Table

The Table.8 shows that there are total 84 students there minimum level of satisfaction with teachers
cooperation is 20% that and the maximum is 100%.
On average there respondents level of satisfaction with teacher cooperation are 54% with the
standard deviation of 26%.
1.8: Table

The Table.9 shows that there are ten male and two female students, thirty seven male and two female
students, twenty three male and four female, and no female and six male students level of
satisfaction with teachers cooperation is 20%, 40%, 60% and 100%respectively. Graph.1.8 also
presents the visual picture.

12

1.9: Table

Table.1.9 shows the response of respondents regarding university dress. In our sample
approximately 17%, 61%, 15% and 7%of the students said that students should wear the uniform ,
clothes, pent shirt and other dress in university respectively. These results can be seen through graph
1.9.
2: Table

Table.2 shows, the 32% and 68% of the total respondents said yes and no respectively that the
allotment at student hostel is strictly followed by the rules and regulation. Graph 2 also presents the
visual picture.
2.1: Table

Table.1.2 shows, There are seventeen male and a female student and 59 male and 7 female students
respond in yes and no respectively about the question that university administration is providing
entertainment facilities to students. The Graph 2.1 presents the visual of picture of detail discussed
below .
2.2: Table

Table.13 shows There are 26 male and a female, seven male and no female, 22 male and 3 female
and 21 male and 4 female students respond the question about librarys environment for study is
good, best, fair and poor respectively. . These results can be seen through graph 2.2.
2.3: Table

There are sixteen male and a female student and 60 male and 7 female students respond in yes and
no respectively about the question that the university administration takes immediate action on study
related issues of the students. Graph 2.3 also presents the visual picture.
2.4: Table

Table.2.4 shows that 8 students agree with v/c performance and also agree with modern technology
used, the four respondents agree with v/c performance but strongly agree with modern technology
used, 26 students agree with v/c performance but disagree with modern technology used, 7
respondent agree with v/c performance but strongly disagree with modern technology used, 3
students strongly agree with v/c performance but agree with modern technology used , 1 respondent
strongly agree with v/c performance and also strongly agree with modern technology used, 9
respondents strongly agree with v/c performance but disagree with modern technology used, the four
students strongly agrees with v/c performance but strongly disagree with modern technology used in

13

the university There are only two respondents disagree with v/c performance but agree with modern
technology used, 1 student disagree with v/c performance and also disagree with modern technology

used, 9 students disagree with v/c performance but strongly disagree with modern technology used, 6
students strongly disagree with VC performance and also strongly disagree with modern technology
used the two respondents strongly disagree with v/c performance but disagree with modern
technology used and 2 students strongly disagree with v/c performance and also strongly disagree
with modern technology used in the university. And also there are total 45, 17, 18, and 4 students are
agree, strongly agree, disagree and strongly disagree with the VC performance irrespective of
modern technology used in the university. And also there are total 13, 6, 46, and 19 students are
agree, strongly agree, disagree and strongly disagree with the modern technology used irrespective of
VC performance. The Graph 2.4 presents the visual of picture of detail discussed below.
2.5: Table

Table.2.5 shows that the 29% and 71% of the total respondents said yes and no respectively that they
have a computer lab in their departments. These results can be seen through graph 2.5.
2.6: Table

Table.2.6 shows that the average number of computers in their departmental computer lab are 8 with
standard deviation of 7 computers. The twenty computers, no computer and 20 computers are the
range, minimum and maximum computers in their departmental computer lab respectively.
2.7: Table

Table.11, the 45% and 55% of the total respondents said yes and no about the question that the
university is offering scholar ship to students respectively. Graph 2.7 also presents the visual picture.
2.8: Table

In our sample there are twenty six male and two female and 50 male and 6 female students out of
eighty four said yes and no that university is providing road map to students about their course
respectively. These results can be seen through graph 2.8.
2.9: Table

Table.2.9 shows that the approximately 15% and 85% of the total respondents said yes and no about
the question that there is health care facility in the university respectively. The Graph 2.9 presents the
visual of picture of detail discussed below.
3: Table

Table.3 shows that, In our sample there are seven male and a female and 69 male and 7 female
students out of eighty four said yes and no that there is checking system at the hostel mess. These
results can be seen through graph 3.
14

3.1: Table

Table.3.1 shows that There are total 84 students, there minimum value is 3 it mean there are three
teachers in their department and maximum value is 60 it mean there are 60 teachers in their
department. Minimum and maximum respectively the department teachers are 13 on average and the
standard deviation of teachers is 8.
3.2: Table

Table.3.2 shows that There are total 84 respondents in my sample, there minimum value is 1 it mean
there is one class room and maximum value is 65 it mean there are 65 class rooms. Minimum and
maximum respectively the class rooms are 5 on average and the standard deviation of class rooms
are 8
3.3: Table

Table.3.3 shows that There are total 84 respondents, there minimum value is 1 it mean there is one
canteen in university and maximum value is 4 its mean there are four canteens in university.
Minimum and maximum respectively is 1 canteen on average and the standard deviation canteen is
.494.
3.4: Table

Table.3.4 shows that There are twenty five male and four female students in our sample sizes eighty
four they have a positive response that university is giving study trip the students there are fifty one
male and four female respondents they have a negative response that university is not giving study
trip the students. The Graph 3.4 presents the visual of picture of detail discussed below.
3.5: Table

Table.3.5 shows that There are total students are 84 in my sample, there minimum value is 0 it mean
there is no sports playing in university and maximum value is 8 it mean there are eight types of
sports are playing in university. Minimum and maximum respectively the types of sports are 2 on
average and the standard deviation of sports are 2.
3.6: Table

Table.3.6 shows that There are total 84 respondents in my sample, there minimum value is 0 it mean
there is no hostel in university and maximum value is 5 it mean there are five hostels in university.
15

Minimum and maximum respectively the hostels are 3 on average and the standard deviation of
hostel is 1.

Chi square test:

3.7: Table

The university take action on study related issues of students asked in question no. 14 with the
options for students to choose any one of two (Yes/No) and the satisfaction of students regarding the
academic management in the university in question no.5 with intensity of response of students
including different options (agree, strongly agree, disagree and strongly disagree). The Chi-square
test is applied on these two categorical questions formulated hypothesis and the complete test is
given below.
Null Hypothesis:
Ho: The students satisfaction level regarding the university academic management is not
associated with immediate actions taken by academic management on study related issues.
Alternate hypothesis:
H1: The students satisfaction level regarding the university academic management is
associated with immediate actions taken by academic management on study related issues.
Level of significance:

= 0.05 is used.
Test Statistics:

2 - Test is used.

Where

oi

is

(oi ei ) 2

=
ei

, where,

i th observed frequency, ei

2 ~ (2r 1)(c1), (1),


is

i th

expected frequency, r is number of rows and c be the

number of columns in table.


Critical region: If p-value (=0.05) then we reject H o , otherwise we do not reject

16

Computations.

2 =16.270 r =4, c = 4, df =3

and P-value=0.001Conclusion; Asp-value<0.05, so we do not

H o and conclude that the students satisfaction level regarding the university academic
management is associated with immediate actions taken by academic management on study related
issues.

Conclusion: the P-value is less than the critical value at 1% and 5%


So we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. The students level of satisfaction regarding
management is highly associated with the university management action that are taken to promote
quality education.

3.8: Table

The modern technology that is used in the university to facilitate the student in their study, a question
was asked with the options (agree, strongly agree, disagree and strongly disagree). and the
satisfaction of students regarding the academic management in the university in question no.5 with
intensity of response of students including different options (agree, strongly agree, disagree and
strongly disagree).
The Chi-square test is applied on these two categorical questions formulated hypothesis and the
complete test is given below.
Null Hypothesis:
H0; the categories are independent.
Alternate hypothesis:
H1; the categories are dependent.
Level of significance:

= 0.05 is used.
Test Statistics:

2 - Test is used.

17

Where

oi

is

(oi ei ) 2

=
ei

, where,

i th observed frequency, ei

2 ~ (2r 1)(c1), (1),

is

i th

expected frequency, r is number of rows and c be the

number of columns in table.


Critical region: If p-value (=0.05) then we reject H o , otherwise we do not reject
Computations.

2 =20.359 r =4, c = 4, df =9

and P-value=.016 Conclusion; Asp-value<0.05, so we do not H o

and conclude that the students satisfaction level regarding the university academic management is
associated with immediate actions taken by academic management on study related issues.
Conclusion: The P-value is less than 5% significance level ( level).
So we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we conclude that level of satisfaction
of student to university management is associated with the modern technology used in the university
to facilitate students.

Correlation analysis:
3.9: Table

When you are providing sports facility that means you are distributing the health among people. The
health facilities and sports facility provided by the university asked in two different questions and the
correlation coefficient between these two variables observed significant both at 1% and 5% level of
significance.
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

18

5: Chapter
Tables

1: Table

gender

Valid

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Male

76

90.5

90.5

90.5

female

9.5

9.5

100.0

Total

84

100.0

100.0

1.1: Table

Qualification

Gender

F.Sc

B.Sc/Bs

Other

Total

male

36

37

76

female

37

43

84

Total

1.2: Table

Department

Gender male

Agri

D.v.m

Marine

Eco

E.d.u

Eng

W.r.m

Total

10

12

11

11

12

12

76

12

12

12

12

12

12

84

female 2
Total

19

12

1.3: Table

Age

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

84

10

18

28

22

Valid N (list wise) 84

1.4: Table

Staff and student

Gender

Good

Best

Fair

Poor

Total

male

24

13

12

27

76

female

30

13

14

27

84

Total
1.5: Table

Academic management

V/c
perform

Agree

Strongly
agree

Strongly
Disagree disagree

Total

Agree

14

19

45

Strongly agree

11

17

Disagree

18

Strongly
disagree

30

29

18

84

Total

1.6: Table

Teaching method

Gender

Total
20

Agree

Strongly agree

Disagree

Strongly
disagree

male

38

13

21

76

female

42

15

23

84

Total

1.7: Table

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

84

80

20

100

54

26

Valid (list wise)

84

1.8: Table

Percent %

Gender

20

40

80

100

Total

male

10

37

23

76

female

12

39

27

84

Total

1.9: Table

Valid

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Uniform

14

17

17

17

Clothes

51

61

61

77

Pent shirt

13

15.5

15.5

93

Other

100

Total

84

100

100

2: Table

Valid

21

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

27

32.1

32.1

32.1

No

57

68

68

100.0

Total

84

100.0

100.0

2.1: Table

Entertain

Gender

Yes

No

Total

male

17

59

76

female

18

66

84

Total

2.2: Table

Library environment

Gender

Good

Best

Fair

Poor

Total

male

26

22

21

76

female

27

25

25

84

Total

2.3: Table

Issues

Gender

Total

22

Yes

No

Total

male

16

60

76

female

17

67

84

2.4: Table

Facilitating technology

V/c
perform

Agree

Strongly agree Disagree

Strongly
disagree

Agree

26

45

Strongly agree

17

Disagree

18

Strongly disagree 0

46

19

84

Total

13

Total

2.5: Table

Valid

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

24

28.6

28.6

28.6

No

60

71.4

71.4

100.0

Total

84

100.0

100.0

2.6: Table

Computer
available

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

84

20

20

Valid N (list wise) 84

2.7: Table

Valid

23

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

38

45.2

45.2

45.2

No

46

54.8

54.8

100.0

Total

84

100.0

100.0

2.8: Table

Roadmap

Gender

Yes

No

Total

male

26

50

76

female

28

56

84

Total

2.9: Table

Valid

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

13

15

15

15

No

71

85

85

100

Total

84

100.0

100

3: Table

Mess checking

Gender

Yes

No

Total

male

69

76

female

76

84

Total

3.1: Table

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Department
teacher

84

57

60

13

Valid N (list wise)

84

24

3.2: Table

class room

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

84

64

65

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

84

.494

Valid N (list wise) 84

3.3: Table

Canteen

Valid N (list wise) 84


3.4: Table

Study trip

Gender

Yes

No

Total

male

25

51

76

female

29

55

84

Total

3.5: Table

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Sports

84

Valid N (list wise)

84

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Hostels

84

Valid N (list wise)

84

3.6: Table

25

3.7: Table
Chi-Square Tests

Value

Df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

16.270a

.001

Likelihood Ratio

16.985

.001

Linear-by-Linear
Association

4.338

.037

N of Valid Cases

84

3.8: Table

Chi-Square Tests

Value

Df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

20.359a

.016

Likelihood Ratio

22.737

.007

Linear-by-Linear Association

8.227

.004

N of Valid Cases

84

3.9: Table

Correlations

Health.fec

Pearson Correlation

Health.fec

Sports

.426**

Sig. (2-tailed)
Sports

26

.000

84

84

Pearson Correlation

.426**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

84

84

Graphs

1: Fig

Frequency

76

Frequency
8

male

female

1.1: Fig

37

36

Gender male
6

1
F.Sc

B.Sc/Bs

Gender female

Other

Qualification
1.2: Fig
12

11

10

12

11

12

8
Gender male

4
2
0
Agri

D.v.m

Marine

Eco

E.d.u

Department

27

Eng

W.r.m

Gender female

1.4: Fig

27

24

13

12

Gender male

6
0
Good

Gender female

Best

Fair

Poor

Staff and student


1.5: Fig
19
14
11

V/c perform Agree


8

V/c perform Strongly agree

6
4

4
1

Agree

3
0 0

Strongly agree

V/c perform Disagree

2
Disagree

V/c perform Strongly disagree

Strongly disagree

A.M
1.6: Fig
38

21
Gender male

13

Gender female
4
Agree

2
Strongly agree

2
Disagree

Teaching method

28

4
0
Strongly disagree

1.8: Fig

37

23
Gender male
10
2

20

Gender female

40

80

100

%
1.9: Fig

Frequency

84

Frequency

51
14
Uniform

Clothes

13

Pent shirt

Other

Total

2: Fig

Frequency
57
27

Frequency

Yes

No
Valid

29

2.1: Fig

59

Gender male

17
7

1
Yes

Gender female

No
Entertain

2.2: Fig

26
22

21
Gender male

7
1
Good

0
Best

Fair

Gender female

Poor

Library environment
2.3: Fig

60

Gender male
16
7

1
Yes

No
Issues

30

Gender female

2.4: Fig
26
V/c perform Agree
9 9

8
3 2
Agree

4
0

1 1 0

Strongly agree

V/c perform Strongly agree

6
2

V/c perform Disagree


V/c perform Strongly disagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Facilitating technology
2.5: Fig

Frequency
60

24
Frequency

Yes

No
Valid

2.7: Fig

Frequency

46

38

Frequency

Yes

No
Valid

31

2.8 Fig

50

26
Gender male
Gender female
6

Yes

No
Roadmap

2.9: Fig

Frequency
71

13

Frequency

Yes

No
Valid

3: Fig
69

Gender male
7

1
Yes

No
Mess checking

32

Gender female

3.4: Fig

51

25

Gender male
4

Yes

No
Study trip

33

Gender female

6: Chapter
6.1: Conclusion

The survey research pointed out that the students are not satisfied with the academic management
and behavior of our staff members with students management of LUAWMS. They did not cooperate
with students on their problem matters, the students are discouraged from management and polices
of the university. The mostly students preferred to wear uniforms in the university but unfortunately
university management is very weak in this regard. Students are not feeling satisfaction in the
existing hostel atmospheres due to bad management. And there is no any environment for sports and
other activities. Students are getting problems in computers lab due to lack of attention to provide
good facilities for students because students could not use internet in the computers labs thats way
they were feeling uneasy from the staff management. Most important things are that mess system is
very bad and food provisions are not clean and safe for health thats why students getting sicks in
different diseases also. The students whenever got emergency, the ambulance mostly not provided by
the transport section of the university. In the university there is no hospital and even well functioning
dispensary. There is no any scholarship program of university in its own for the students. No road
map is provided by the teachers that are way students were getting problems in their studies. The last
but not least problem, the staff is not up to the required strength in the LUAWMS, Uthal University.
6.2: Recommendations

34

Administrator, coordinators and even classroom teachers should be asked to help determining
whether the university should invest in to improve the quality of education.
The VC and the responsible for academic should make new rules and regulations for
development of the university and hence implement them into university.
Academic members should make good behaviors with students to create a friendly
environment for education in the university.
Staff members should cooperate with students problem matters.
University management should conduct a survey in the all departments to remove the mistake
and misunderstanding problems among students and staff members to create a good
environment in the university.
LUAWMS management should provide the standard accommodation to the students and
mess system specially that is critically low standard, due to this students get sicks in various
diseases.
LUAWMS should hired new lectures in the different departments because the existing staff is
less of required strength.

35

LUAWMS managements should maintain and upgrade the computers labs, as the students
will be facilitated from the modern learning of knowledge.
LUAWMS management should alert their securities in the hostel as the students did not feel
satisfactions in the hostel as well as it should be here.
Staff members should create a study environments in the university than all students could be
participate their precious times in the library.
VC should make a new helpline numbers or any type of box. Where all students could be feel
easy to convey their problem messages directly to him.
VC should hired a new inspection team to monitory on the classes and other issues which are
existing among staff members and students.

6.3 References

www.luawms.edu.pk

www.businessdictionary.com/defination
Gillani, B.B.(2003). Learning theories and the design of e-learning environments. Lanham,
MD: University Press of America.
Collis, B., & Moonen, J.(2001). Flexible learning in a digital world. London: Kogan Page.
Slaughter CA. Bright but demanding future for core facilities. J Biomol Tech 2005;16:167169
Haley RA. Framework for managing core facilities within the research enterprise. J Biomol
Tech 2009;20:226-230
Hobbs, D. (2005, October). Training and Development in Australia, 14-16. Understanding
learning management system.

36

Weakness of LUAWMS
Management A survey in LUAWMS
university Uthal
By Jalil Ahmed
Questionnaire

Your Ideas are very important for my research please cooperate.


1) What is your gender?
a) Male
b) Female
2) Qualification?
a) F.sc
b) B.sc/B.s
b) M.phil
d) Other
3) What is your Department?
a) Agriculture
b) D.v.m
c)

Marine

d) Economics

e)

Education

f) English

g) W.R.M
4) what is your age?

5 ) You Satisfy Academic Management in Luawms?


a) Agree

b) Disagree

b) Strongly agree d) Strongly disagree


6.) How is the cooperation b/w Staff and Students?
a) Good

b) Fair

c) Best

d) Poor

7) you satisfy with V/C performance in Luawms.

37

a) Agree

b) dis agree

c) Strongly agree

d) Strongly Disagree

8) Do you satisfy with lecturers teaching method?


a) Strongly Agree

b) Agree

c) Strongly disagree

d) Disagree

9) How much teachers cooperate with students?


a) 20%

b) 40%

c) 80%

d) 100%

10) Students should wear.. in University.


a) Uniform

b) Clothes

c) Pent shirt

d) Other

11) Are you satisfy with rules and regulation regarding hostel allotment being implemented?
a) Yes
b) No
12) University administration is also facilitating entertaining environment.
a) Yes
b) No
13) How Luawms library environment like?
a) Good

b) Fair

c) Satisfactory

d) Excellent

14) Does university academic takes action immediately on issues related students?
a) Yes
b) No
15) university facilitate students with modern technology.
a) Strongly Agree

b) Agree

c) Strongly disagree

d) Disagree

16) Is there computer lab in your department?


a) Yes
b) No
38

17) How many computers available in your department computer lab?


a) 5

b) 10

c) 15

d) 20

18) Does university offering scholarship to students?


a) Yes
b) No
19) Does university provide road map to students about their course?
a) Yes
b) No
20) Is there health facility in LUAWMS?
a) Yes
b) No
21) Is there any checking system in hostel mess?
a) Yes
b) No
22) How many teachers do you have in department?
..
23) How many class rooms do you have in department?

24) How many canteens are in the university?


a) 1

b) 2

c) 3

d) 4

25) Does the university give study trip to the students?


a) Yes
b) No
26) How many types of sports are playing in LUAWMS University?
.
39

27) How many hostels does University has?


.
28) What are your feelings about LUAWMS University? (Optional )

Thank you very much for sharing your ideas.

40

Вам также может понравиться