Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract: The subject of debris mobility has long been one of the key areas of development in slope engineering practice in Hong Kong.
Back in 1962, Professor Lumb in an early publication acknowledged that consequences of slope failures can be devastating if debris
avalanches down the slope reaching populated areas. Research in debris mobility has always been a key subject in landslide risk
assessment and mitigation. In the 1990s, debris mobility of man-made slope failures has been studied using travel angles of historical
landslides as the key debris mobility indicator. This empirical debris mobility model has proved to be useful in estimating runout
distances of landslides on man-made slopes. Since early 1990s, there has been increasing concern on the potential hazards of natural
terrain landslides to urban development amid its rapid expansion into steep natural hillsides. The travel angle approach, however,
does not model adequately the runout behaviours of natural terrain landslides on sloping terrain, in particular, channelised flows and
landslides of long runout distances. Over the years, it has been demonstrated that numerical modelling of landslide dynamics is an
effective tool to not only estimating runout distances but also studying runout behaviours, such as the debris influence zone, runout
velocity and flow depth. This paper reviews the technological advancement made in debris mobility modelling over the past decades,
and presents the potential applications of the latest development of debris mobility modelling in assessing of natural terrain landslide
hazards.
INTRODUCTION
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1
- Cut - sliding
- Fill - liquefaction
- Cut - washout
- Fill - sliding
- Fill - washout
- Retaining wall
10
100
1000
10000
Landslide Volume (m3)
100000
Travel Angle ()
40
Fig. 2. Definition of travel angle.
30
20
10
0
10
100
1000
10000
Total Debris Volume (m3)
100000
LATEST DEVELOPMENT
POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS
f(s)
Probability of
material strength
less than L
Probability
Density
Function
(PDF) of
material
strength
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
5
DISCUSSIONS
REFERENCES
Ayotte, D. & Hungr, O. (1998). Runout Analysis of Debris
Flows and Debris Avalanches in Hong Kong. Final
Report on back-analysis of twenty case-histories based on
runout characteristics.
Report to the Geotechnical
Engineering Office, Hong Kong.
Chen, H. (1999). Mechanism and Modelling of Landslides in
Hong Kong. PhD thesis. The University of Hong Kong.
Chen, H. & Lee, C. F. (2000). Numerical simulation of debris
flows. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 37, 146-160.
Choi, A.S.W., Fung, E.K.S., Law, A.M.H. & King, J.P. (2003).
Luminescence Dating of Colluvium and Landslide Deposits
in Hong Kong & Toe Slope Angle of Natural Terrain
Landslides. GEO Report No. 134, Geotechnical Engineering
Office, Hong Kong, 114 p.
Corominas, J. (1996). The angle of reach as a mobility index for
small and large landslides. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,
Vol. 33, 260-271.
Cruden, D.M. & Varnes, D.J. (1996). Landslide types and
processes. Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation.
Transportation Research Board Special Report 247,
National Research Council, 36-75.
Geotechnical Engineering Office (1996). Report on the Shum
Wan Road Landslide of 13 August 1995 - Findings of the
Landslide Investigation. Geotechnical Engineering Office,
Hong Kong, 49 p.
Wang, G., Shao S. & Fei, X. (1997). Particle model for alluvial
fan formation.
Debris-flow Hazards Mitigation:
Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment. Edited by Gerald
F. Wieczorek & Nancy D. Naeser. 143-152.
The dynamics of