Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
South Asia is the continent where worlds poorest population is habituating. Its social
and economic indicators stand out in terms of the number of persons below the
poverty line, some of the lowest literacy and high infant mortality rates.
(Annex Table 1).
A strong labour force can be considered an asset for any country. However, in many
South Asian countries poverty, poor access to basic facilities such as health, education
and adequate nutrition, and extremely hard work for survival do not give many of its
citizens room to flourish in life, or develop their full potential. This is reflected in the
social indicators presented in (Annex Table 1).
The occupations of the majority of the resource poor in South Asia include
agriculture, fishing, salt pan work and artisan work. Often agricultural activities are
carried out in land which does not belong to them (large landowners own the land).
The economic activities are carried out with basic implements. It is not incorrect to
say that the major asset of the majority of the people in South Asia is their physical
labour. Women often contribute an equal share, and sometimes even a larger share to
the economic activities. For both men and women it is hard physical, manual labour
for minimum returns that keep them at the minimum level of survival.
Number of
people killed
Bangladesh
India
Nepal
Pakistan
Sri Lanka
South Asia
44,014
5,063
783
748
87
50,695
% of total
killed in South
Asia
86.82
9.99
1.54
1.48
0.17
100.00
Number of
% Of total
people affected affected in
South Asia.
18,574,280
24.05
56,563.631
73.22
200,768
0.2
1,407,065
1.82
504,297
0.65
77,250.041
100.00
The impact of this magnitude on people and property is entirely due to the limited
capacity resulting from lack of resources, and poverty at all levels. According to the
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (1993.p.4) people
in low - income countries are 4 times more likely to die in an extreme natural event
than people in high-income countries.
In the opening plenary it was mentioned that it is the poor and the powerless that get
the most direct impact of any extreme natural or economic phenomena. It was also
mentioned that the poor face the highest levels of risk to such phenomena. At this
point we need to ask the questions - Is the poor a homogenous group? What are the
other elements, other than material poverty, which contribute to their vulnerability?
Economic, social, and political factors make the resource poor vulnerable to
disasters. Factors such as gender, class, caste, ethnicity, age, and disability make the
already vulnerable further vulnerable in different degrees, and increase their levels of
risk to disasters.
Jewelry, in South Asian societies is a significant matter. It is part of the dowry which
provide security to women. As Bhutta describes, in the riverine communities it was
significant how the linkage was made that the disaster made them to part with the
jewelry, to which women clung to throughout their lives as something to fall back on
in case of abandonment or widowhood. Women felt that their vulnerability increased
since they had to part with the only security they had.
Impact on Children
The most visible impact on children in the riverine disaster presented by Bhutta, is the
increased drop out ratio from schools. Observation made in flood affecting areas in
Jhang, Punjab (Ariyabandu, Visit Report to Jhang) is that schools are washed away by
the floods so frequently in some parts of the Jhang area, they are closed down
permanently. Children who drop out, and who have no opportunity to attend schools,
support their parents by taking charge of household chores such as feeding cattle,
helping with agricultural activities, or migrate to cities looking for casual
employment. Children from very poor families whose parents are displaced or without
work are sent to beg.
Bhutta concludes that facing the riverine disaster the children in both villages have
been imprinted with the shock and trauma of grief and agony faced. The rebuilding of
houses and other rehabilitation activities continued but there was hardly any effort to
look into the issues of the lost innocence and trauma faced by the children.
The media images show women carrying empty pots on their heads in search of water.
It is observed that in some areas only women are remaining to face and manage the
crisis. At the onset of crisis, men often migrate to more lucrative areas to earn a living.
In the village Sonari in the drought stricken Thar in Pakistan it is observed that it is
only women, children and old people remain in the village. (The News, Pakistan
14.5.2000) Women fetch brackish water from nearby wells, climb trees to fetch a
local fruit that help to quench thirst of humans and cattle. The report further noted that
without a single man visible in the village, the lives of these hardy women revolve
around their donkeys, goats and malnourished children.
Further, the health situation of the women in drought affected Thar is a matter of
serious concern. It is reported that thousands of women in the Thar desert area are
infected with Tuberculosis. According to a woman who suffers from the disease, men
in the community do not consider women important enough to spend money on. She
further stated that since there are hardly any women doctors in the area men use it as
an excuse for not allowing the women to get medical treatment often. It is socially not
acceptable for male doctors to treat women.
These accounts demonstrate the vicious cycle, in which the structures in society keep
women at low key in terms of education, employment opportunities and mobility. The
major gap here is the socially constructed dependency of women on male family
members turn against women in its absence. There are hardly any social structures to
address this gap, and as a result the low-key position of women from poor groups
limit their options for survival.
Changes required
Vulnerability involves a variety of layers. It is a too complex task to fully unearth
dormant features of situated vulnerability particularly in South Asian societies,
resulting from multiple determinants.
Addressing the root causes and social conditions of vulnerability needs to be dealt
with at two levels; at the fundamental level, and at a practical level. At the
fundamental level the issues of entitlements, access to the basic needs, and the
requirements of the resource poor to develop their full potential surface as key
issues. To address the fundamental issues of this nature, the will and commitment at
all levels is a requirement.
At a practical level, enormous initiatives take place all over the world to minimise
the suffering from disasters, to rebuild and rehabilitate We need to question how
effective are they in the backdrop of ever increasing numbers of dead and affected
from various hazards. Whether these initiatives are capable of addressing the root
causes of risk and vulnerability is a question which require much thought.
Taking where we are now as the starting point, we need to take initiative to locate
disasters from an overall livelihood perspective. Identification of elements of risk and
vulnerabilities within the daily livelihoods of the poor will guide us towards the
location of hazards, the associated risks and vulnerabilities. Most importantly an
overall livelihood perspective will indicate towards the strengths and capacities of
people living with disasters.
Therefore, at a practical level to reduce vulnerability to disasters we need initiatives
which create space for men and women to enhance their capacities, to enhance
survival strategies. Also we need to identify and create risk and vulnerability
reduction possibilities within the exsisting livelihoods. A further question arise
however, how effective is addressing specific disaster related concerns be, if the
fundamental issues are not addressed side by side.
Madhavi Malalgoda Ariyabandu
Programme Manager- Disaster Mitigation
Intermediate Technology Development Group (ITDG)
5, Lional Edirisinghe Mawatha,
Colombo 5
Sri Lanka
E mail madhavi@itdg.lanka.net
Phone- 94 1 829412-5
Fax 94 1 856188
References
1.Ariyabandu M.M., Defeating Disasters- Ideas for Action. Intermediate Technology
Development Group (ITDG), 1999
2.Ariyabandu M.M.,Visit Report to Jhang, Pakistan, May 2000. ITDG internal
document.
3.Bhutta A.H., The Response of Rriverine Communities to Disasters. A case study of
a Pakistan Village Mamola, with Special Reference to Changes in Livelihood Patterns
and Community Based Rehabilitation. Unpublished report , ITDG, 1999
4.Fernando P, Fernando V., South Asian Women: Facing Disasters, Securing Life;
Intermediate Technology Development Group (ITDG), 1997.
5.Kafi S.A. Disaster and Destitute Women; Twelve case studies, BDPC 1992, Dhaka
6.Shamim A., A Cry from the Land of Peacocks, The News -Pakistan,
May 14, 2000
7.Shamim A, The Deadly Combination. The News Pakistan, May 14, 2000.
8. World Disasters Report 1993, International Federation of Red Cross and Red
Crescent Societies.
9. World Development Report 1998/1999.
Annex Table 1
Bangladesh
124
India
961
Nepal
23
Pakistan
137
Sri Lanka
18
33.2
373.9
4.8
67.2
14.8
270
390
210
490
800
68
66
49
40
38
207
173
179
161
48
male
Female
male
Female
male
female
male
Female
male
femal
e
51
74
35
62
59
86
50
76
13
35.6
35
42
34
35.3
10