Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Facts
8. Blah
9. Blah
10. Blah
First Claim for Relief
Negligence
11. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1-X
Demand for Relief
WHEREFORE, the plaintiff demands judgment in the amount of his/her actual damages
plus interest and costs, and such other relief as the court finds just and equitable
Signature
Attorney information
Talbot - SERVICE
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
11:32 PM
INTRO
The summons is signed by the clerk and bears the seal of the court 4(a)
2.
copy of complaint 4(c)(1)
2. SERVICE CAN BE PERFECTED BY ANY NON-PARTY WHO IS AT LEAST 18 YEARS OLD 4(c)(2)
3. PROCESS MUST BE SERVED WITHIN 120 DAYS OF THE FILING OF THE SUIT - 4(m)
Will then be dismissed without prejudice unless good cause can be shown for
the delay
4. HOW TO SERVE INDIVIDUALS
RULE 4(e)(2)
Personal service
RULE 4(e)(1)
4.
Under the provisions governing service of process on individuals in the
courts of the state where the federal court sits
RULE 4(h)
1.
Delivery of a copy of the summons and complaint to an officer,
managing or general agent of the defendant, or to an agent authorized to
receive service
6. WAIVER OF SERVICE
The plaintiff can solicit a waiver of all these technicalities by sending (by first
class mail or other reliable means) the defendant a complaint, two copies of a
notice of the action and a written request that the defendant waive formal
service of the summons and complaint upon him. The written request must
inform the defendant of the consequences of not waiving process and set the
date on which the request was sent
RULE 4(k)(1)(A)
Federal court can serve process throughout the state in which that
court sits
Court can serve process outside of the state only if the state court could
do so
We can serve process out of state so long as it is when 100 miles of the
federal court house, however only applies parties joined under RULE 14, 19
Federal statutes may allow for more service of process outside of the
state
8. WAS SERVICE CONSTITUTIONAL
The fact that service was actually made does not validate the method of
service
When can a federal court assert personal jurisdiction over a defendant served
under Rule 4
1.
Has the relevant legislature authorized the jurisdiction?
Talbot - REMOVAL
Thursday, May 01, 2008
5:00 PM
INTRO
The federal removal statutes allow the defendant, after the plaintiff has chosen a state
court, to "second-guess" that choice by removing some types of cases from the state court
to federal court
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
You cannot remove a diversity case more than 1 year after it was filed
in state court 1446(b)
1446(a) notice of removal must be filed in the federal district court and division within
which the action is pending
1446(d) a copy of the notice must be filed in state court
1446(a) copies of all pleadings, process, and orders served on defendants must be
filed with notice
1446(a) all parties must be notified promptly after filing notice
1446(b) notice must be filed within 30 days after service
81(c) if the answer if filed before removal, the answer stands as the answer in federal
court
81(c) answer within 20 days of complaint or within 5 days after notice for removal is
filed (whichever is longer
6(b) move for extension of time
Talbot - VENUE
Thursday, May 01, 2008
5:00 PM
INTRO
Venue rules (coupled with personal jurisdiction and SMJ) are meant to further restrict
the places where the plaintiff may choose to bring a suit, to assure that suits are tried
in a place that bears some sensible relationship to the claims asserted or to the parties
to the action.
IPJ
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
SMJ
Article III Section II of the United States Constitution sets the outer boundaries
for Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction. It permits jurisdiction in Federal Courts for
cases arising under Constitution, Federal Statutes and Treaties. It also allows for
suits between parties of diverse citizenship. Because Article III Section II allows for
broad interpretation, Congress enacted 1331 and 1332 to narrow the parameters.
The applicable rule for venue depends on the type of subject matter jurisdiction
available.
Federal Diversity SMJ Basis under 1332 go to 1391(a)
Federal Question SMJ: Basis under 1331 go to 1391(b)
1.
Local actions must be brought in the district where the land lies
2.
2.
3.
For purposes of selecting a district, consider each district its own state.
4.
WAIVER OF VENUE
The defendant waives her objection to venue by failing to raise it when she
responds to the plaintiff's complaint. 12(h)(1)
5.
CHALLENGING VENUE
6.
TRANSFER OF VENUE
The transferee court must be a proper venue and it must have personal
jurisdiction over the defendant without waiver
1404 Transfer
7.
the court may dismiss a case where the interest of justice indicate that it
should be litigated elsewhere.
1.
Interest and convenience of the parties access to proof
2.
Public interest at stake
3.
Efficiency and expense
Talbot - MOTIONS
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
11:31 PM
INTRO
The defendant may answer a complaint with a pre-answer motion as an alternative to
answering the complaint and the defendant need not answer the complaint until the motion is
decided
BASICS
7(b) must be in writing, state grounds for and relief sought and signed via Rule 11
43(a) affidavit testimony can be presented with a motion
RULE 12(a)(4)(A) if a court denies a motion or postpones its disposition, the responsive
pleading shall be served within 10 days of the courts action
RULE 12(a)(4)(B) if the court grants a motion for a more definite statement RULE 12(e)
the responsive pleading shall be served within 10 days
RULE 12(g) and (h) if not raised before the answer or in the answer the following
defenses are waived:
i.
Personal jurisdiction
ii.
Venue
iii.
The form of the process
iv.
The method of service of process
THE MOTIONS (12(B)(2-5) MUST BE PUT IN THE FIRST RULE 12 RESPONSE(ANSWER, MOTION,
ETC)!!!)
RULE 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant
RULE 12(b)(3) motion to dismiss because the court is not a proper venue
RULE 12(b)(4) motion to dismiss for insufficiency of process (something wrong with the
process itself not the method)
Asserts a defect in the scope of the suit as to the plaintiff has framed it
RULE 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be
granted
1.
It tests the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's claim, questioning whether the law
accords a remedy on the facts alleged.
2.
It tests the factual, or formal, sufficiency of the complaint, questioning whether
the plaintiff has set forth her claim in appropriate detail.
Rule 12(c): Motion for judgment on the pleadings after all pleadings are filed treated
as a motion for summary judgment (Rule 56).
If motion is granted, opposing party has 10 days to comply, or the court may
strike the pleading
The court may order stricken from any pleading any insufficient defense or any
redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter
Talbot - PLEADINGS
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
11:36 PM
INTRO
Pleadings are the papers filed by parties at the beginning of an action, in which they
set forth their positions as to the facts at issue. Pleadings are not evidence; they are
not even sworn testimony by the parties or their attorneys
1.
RULE 11
1.
Certification
RULE 11(a) requires an attorney to sign each pleading and state his
address
Counsel has a 21-day safe harbor from the date of the motion
for rule 11 sanctions to correct the deficient pleading.
Basic Requirements
i.
RULE 10(a) requires every pleading to have a caption that includes the
name of court, the docket number of the action, the names of the parties, and a
designation of the pleading
ii.
RULE 10(b) requires all allegations to be set forth in numbered
paragraphs and that all allegations in each paragraph "shall be limited as far as
practicable to a statement of a single set of circumstances"
Other Rules
i.
RULE 8(e)(2) allows pleading in the alternative
ii.
RULE 10(c) allows parties to attach exhibits to their pleadings.
iii.
iv.
COMPLAINT
In General
i.
RULE 3: a civil action is commenced by the filing a complaint with the
court
ii.
the complaint sets forth the plaintiff's claim
iii.
look to see if the rules allow joinder of all the desired parties
iv.
look to see that the claim is legally sufficient:
Requirements
i.
A "short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's
jurisdiction depends"
RULE 8(a)(1) requires the plaintiff to allege the basis for SMJ
over the action
ii.
A "short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is
entitled to relief"
RULE 54(c) the demand does not limit the plaintiff's recovery
Dismissal
i.
Voluntary Dismissal
RULE 41(a) permits the plaintiff to dismiss:
ii.
Lack of jurisdiction
Improper venue
ANSWER
The answer is the defendants response that states his position as to each of the
allegations in the complaint and asserts any other defenses he may have to the plaintiff's
claim
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
stating the parts that are true and denying the remainder
vii.
viii.
ix.
x.
i.
ii.
iii.
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Estoppel
Failure of consideration
Fraud
Illegality
Claims by the defendant
Counterclaim
Cross-claim
Force joinder of parties
Failure to Respond: Default and Default Judgment
If a defendant fails to plead or otherwise respond in time they are held
in default. This is just a notation on the court's docket sheet.
The party must seek a default judgment
RULE 55(b)(1) when the judgment is for a sum certain or a determinable
amount the clerk can enter judgment
RULE 55(b)(2) in all other cases you must ask the judge
RULE 54(c) a judgment by default shall be the same as the amount
prayed for in the demand for judgment.
REPLY
SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS
Quick Terms
Upon information and belief
Lack information sufficient to form belief
Insufficient information to form a belief
Admit specific, deny the rest (general)
Talbot - AMENDMENTS
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
11:32 PM
INTRO
15(a) - before the responsive pleading is filed no permission is requirement for the FIRST
amendment
15(a) - after the responsive pleading is filed, permission to amend shall be freely given
where justice so requires by the court OR with the consent of the other parties.
Express
A party shall plead response to amended pleading within the time of the original
pleading or within 10 days whichever is greater.
INTRO
Rule 15(c) provides the framework for determining whether to allow a party to amend their
complaint after the limitations period for the complaint has run.
IN GENERAL
RULE 15(c) provides that the amendment to a pleading will "relate back to the date of
the original pleading" if it arises from the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth in
the original pleading
ADD A NEW CLAIM
RULE 15(c)(2) provides that, once you have sued the defendant for particular conduct,
or a certain transaction or occurrence, any amendment to add new claims based on the
same conduct, transaction or occurrence will be treated, for statute of limitation
purposes, as though it had been in the original complaint.
P claimed his termination violated a federal age discrimination act. He later amended his
complaint to allege fraud against his employer
1.
Since he limited his factual allegations to his termination, "a reasonably prudent
person would not have expected from reading the plaintiff's original complaint that
promises made to the plaintiff before termination might be called into question
through subsequent pleadings.
2.
Court found that the amended pleading alleging fraud did not relate back to the
original complaint
RULE 15(c)(3) amendments to add a party will only relate back if three requirements are
met:
1.
The claim against the new party to be added by amendment arises from the
same conduct, transaction or occurrence as the original claim (RULE 15(c)(2)
satisfied)
2.
The new party had notice, within the period for delivery of the original
complaint, that the action against the original defendant had been filed (120 days
from filing 4(m))
3.
The new party knew or should have known that, but for a mistake as to the
identity of the proper party, the original action would have been against him.
Talbot - JOINDER
Thursday, May 01, 2008
4:46 PM
IF THE CLAIM IS AGAINST A THIRD PARTY/ADDITIONAL PARTY THEN ADD UNDER RULE
19, 20 THEN RETURN
RULE 18(a) allows the claimant to assert every claim she has against the
opposing party. (permissive rule)
i.
Original claim
ii.
Counterclaim
iii.
Cross-claim
iv.
Third-party claim
COUNTERCLAIMS
2.
CROSS-CLAIMS
3.
If not, then the court can order separate trials under 42 (B)
Severance.
4.
SMJ
3. PROPER PARTIES
SMJ
IPJ
RULE 21 misjoinder of parties is not grounds for dismissal. Parties may be
dropped by the court.
Cases
6. INDEMNIFICATION
Indemnification is the addition of a third party who may also be liable for some or all
of the existing claim.
Sen. 8: Any party may move to strike 3rd party claim, or for its severance or
separate trial.
3.
IPJ
Do complete analysis for new party
SMJ
1331, 1332, 1367
7. INTERVENTION
Parties not joined under rule 19 or 20 can nevertheless intervene into the action
through RULE 24
We look to how close we are to trial and when the intervener became
aware of the litigation
INTERVENTION OF RIGHT
24(a)(1) - when a statute confers an unconditional right to intervene
SMJ
i.
1367(a) generally allows supplemental jurisdiction over 19(a)
interventions
ii.
Do analysis for 19(b) interventions
IPJ
8. INTERPLEADER
When the stakeholder wants all parties with an interest in the thing present so
one judgment is binding on them all.
Prevents issues of multiple liability
RULE INTERPLEADER RULE 22
Complete diversity
Proper venue
STATUTORY INTERPLEADER 1335
1.
Minimal diversity 1335(a)(1)
Court allows the joining of multiple state court claims to allow one
ruling
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Tashire (1967)
Bus-truck accident in CA
Not a proper case for injunction, because this one little policy is not
important enough to shape the wholke claim
Counterclaim for interpleader RULE 13(a)
Join additional defendants on counterclaim RULE 13(g)
2.
INTRO
Class action status is a legal device that allows disputes involving large numbers of
plaintiffs to be settled in one trial or settlement. One or more class representatives are
formally joined as parties in the case. The remaining members of the class action are not
joined, but are bound to the outcome. If the plaintiffs can meet the requirements set
forth in Rule 23(a) and (b) they can make a motion for class action certification
1. Who is in the class?
1. INITIAL REQUIREMENTS
Some common question of fact or law that unite all the claims by all the
members.
The class can be broken down into subclasses each with their own class
status 23(c)(4)
4.
Fair and Adequate Representatives: Nature of the adequacy of the class
representation (must be capable of exercising judgment for the class) and the
representatives attorney (experience and resources).
Usually the class actions have some pre-existing relationship, and the
adjudication would effect everyone in that group so class action status is
needed to protect all the witnesses.
23(b)(2): The opposing party has acted towards the class such that
declarative and injunctive relief is appropriate for a class. Focus is not
monetary relief OR
23(b)(3) : The court finds that the questions of law or fact common to the
members of the class predominate over any questions affecting only
individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available
methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.
DISCUSS:
i.
Interest of members of the class in individually
controlling the prosecution or defense of separate actions
ii.
The extent and nature of any litigation concerning the
controversy already commenced by or against members of the
class
iii.
The desirability or undesirability of concentrating the
litigation of the claims in the particular forum
iv.
The difficulties likely to be encountered in the
management of a class action.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Efficiency
Interest in Individual in bringing their own claim
(variations in amount of damages sought), and more $$ by going
to trial
Maximum pot first to court gets all the money. (Small
company will be insolvent) more equitable to be class action.
Only way case will be brought, because individual
monetary claim is not much ($25).
3. NOTICE
For 23(b)(3) class actions, the court must send notice (that they can opt out see
below) to all members who can be identified through a reasonable effort. Tells
them:
To bring the class action into court, the class must allege the basis for proper SMJ
over which the court may hear this claim.
FQSMJ
Even then the court may decline to exercise jurisdiction "in the interest
of justice and looking at the totality of the circumstances" 1332(d)(3)
Amount in controversy
6. IPJ
In general IPJ rules are meant to protect defendants who have the most to lose,
therefore the court needs IPJ over all members of the defendant class.
Specific IPJ
Philips - not really worried about IPJ over plaintiffs since there interest
are not being impeded
7. PROCEDURE
In the complaint it must be specified that the suit is a class action 23(c)(1)(A)
A class representative must make a motion to certify the class action 23(c)(1)
and the class must be notified under 23(c)(2)
The class can be broken down into subclasses each with their own class status
23(c)(4)
The court has an extra interest in supervising the class action to protect the
interest off all the class members that are not there to watch out for themselves.
The court must approve any settlement, dismissal, or compromise 23(e)
8. OTHER
Class Action Fairness Act of 2005: The Act gives federal courts jurisdiction to
certain class actions in which the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million, and in
which any of the members of a class of plaintiffs is a citizen of a state different
from any defendant
Talbot - DISCOVERY
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
11:38 PM
REQUIRED DISCLOSURES
ii.
iii.
iv.
2.
i.
ii.
iii.
2.
DISCOVERY TOOLS
DEPOSITIONS
RULE 30(a)(2)(A) imposes a presumptive limit of 10 depositions per side
RULE 30(d)(2) limits each deposition to one day of seven hours
RULE 30(b)(2) permits depositions to be recorded electronically
RULE 30(b) if the deponent is a party, counsel initiates the deposition by
sending a notice of deposition to all parties in the action, stating the time
and place of the deposition
RULE 45 if the deponent is not a party, he must be "subpoenaed" for
the deposition
RULE 30(c) the witness is sworn, subjecting the testimony to the
penalties of perjury
RULE 30(c) unlike in trial, if a question is objected to, the witness must
still answer
RULE 30(d)(1) objections based on privilege allows counsel to instruct
the witness not to answer
RULE 32(c) a transcript is required if the deposition is later offered into
evidence.
INTERROGATORIES
RULE 33 allows any party to send to any other party written questions
that require a written response under oath.
3.
4.
RULE 35 can only be used when the movant shows "good cause" and
the mental or physical condition is "in controversy"
5.
3.
RULE 26(g)
Counsel must certify that request and responses are not frivolous
SCOPE OF DISCOVERY
Standard 26(b)(1)
Privileged Material
Work Product
b.
DISCOVERY SANCTIONS
RULE 37(c)(2) failure to admit something that should have been admitted under
36
Party responded to request for production, but has failed to say he will
allow production
RULE 37(b) authorizes the court, if the party does not respond to
the motion to compel, to impose sanctions
a.
Striking claims
b.
Taking disputed facts or claims as established
c.
Excluding evidence
d.
Dismissing the action
e.
Ordering payment of the fees and expenses caused by
the refusal to comply
RULE 37(a)(4) the court can order the noncomplying party to pay
the moving party's expenses and fees for the motion to compel
RULE 26(b)(2) allows the court to limit discovery when "the burden or
expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit."
RULE 26(c) allows a court to enter a protective order to prevent "undue
burden or stress"
5.
TIMING
RULE 16(b) the scheduling order can be issued at any time, but must be issued
no later than 90 days after the appearance of the defendant and 120 days after
service of the complaint.
RULE 26(f) requires that all parties or their counsel confer "as soon as
practicable and in any event at least 21 days before the scheduled conference is
held or a scheduling order is due under RULE 16(b)
RULE 26(d) the purpose of the conference is to discuss "the nature and basis of
their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or
resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by RULE
26(a)(1), and to develop a proposed discovery plan."
RULE 26(d) no discovery can occur until the after the conference has occurred.
RULE 26(f) within 14 days after the RULE 26(f) conference, the parties must
submit a written report of this conference.
6.
RULE 16(a)(5) the express objective of conferences has been "facilitating the
settlement of the case"
RULE 16(b) federal judges can refer RULE 16 matters to a magistrate judge
RULE 16(b) requires a scheduling order in all cases except those falling into
categories exempt by court rule.
RULE 16(b) permits, but does not require, the court to hold a scheduling
conference with the parties or their lawyers to assist in her preparation of the
scheduling order.
RULE 16(b)(1-3) The scheduling order must establish time limits for joinder of
additional claims or parties, amendment of pleadings, motions, and discovery
RULE 16(c) through ongoing monitoring, the court may be able to narrow the
number and scope of issues still needing resolution at trial.
RULE 16(d) "as close to the time as reasonable under the circumstances," the
court may hold the final pretrial conference, to "formulate a plan for trial,
including a program for facilitating the admission of evidence."
RULE 16(e) the judge enters an order "reciting the action taken" at the
INTRO
The motion for summary judgment is designed to allow early resolution of cases in which the
plaintiff meets the minimal burden to plead the elements of a compensable claim, but cannot
prove one or more of those elements.
MOTION TO DISMISS
12(b)(6) Granted if the face of Pleadings dont assert a claim
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
INTRO
The rules frequently authorize joinder of claims over which there is no independent basis of SMJ.
This dilemma was somewhat solved by the creation of supplemental jurisdiction through 1367.
If the plaintiff brings a proper federal claim or diversity claim, so the court has "original
jurisdiction," the court may hear all claims that are part of the same "case or controversy under
Article III."
FIRST, DOES THIS CLAIM MEET 1367(a) statute of Gibbs
Case or controversy was defined in Gibbs (albeit before 1367 was drafter) as the
"common nucleus of operative fact" as the federal claim.
EXAMPLES
A first sues a non-diverse party on a claim of federal question. A state law claim is
joined under 18(a). No independent basis for jurisdiction Supplemental rescues.
A first sues a non-diverse party on a claim of federal question. The brings a
compulsory counterclaim 13(a) based on state law. No independent basis for
jurisdiction Supplemental rescues.
A (LA) sues (CA) on a claim of federal question. The impleads a 3P (CA) under
14(a) for a state law claim. No independent basis for jurisdiction Supplemental
rescues.
Gives the court discretion to decline to exercise supp jur for the following
1.
Claim raises a novel or complex issue of state law
2.
The claim substantially predominates over the claim or claims over which the
court has original jurisdiction
3.
The court has dismissed the original claims
4.
In exceptional circumstances, there are other compelling reasons for declining
jurisdiction