FILED

2815 FEB 10 PH 5:03

AGENDA

CITY OF OAKLAND

TO: JOHNA. FLORES

INTERIM CITY ADMINISTRATOR

REPORT

F R O M : SeanWhent

SUBJECT: Monthly Police Staffing Report

DATE: January 24, 2015

City Administrator
Approval

Date

COUNCIL DISTRICT: Citv-wide

RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests that the Public Safety Committee accept the Oakland Police Department's (OPD)
monthly information report on recruiting and sworn staffing levels as of December 31, 2014
/

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The information in this report reflects changes to OPD's sworn staffing levels through December
31,2014.
ANALYSIS
Table 1: January 1 ^' Sworn Staffing Levels

Year
2000
2001
2002
2003

Sworn
Staffing
675
743
732
775

Year
2004
2005
2006
2007

Sworn
Staffing
756
704
683
699

Year
2008
2009
2010
2011

Sworn
Staffing
736
830
780
656

Sworn
Year Staffing
2012 642
2013 613
2014 626
2015 695

Item;
Public Safety Committee
February 24, 2015

John A. Flores, Interim City Administrator

Subject: Monthly Police Staffing Report

Date: January 24, 2015

Page 2

Figure 1: Sworn Staffing 2000-2015

Sworn Staffing
850

800

750

700

650

600
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

As of December 31, 2014 sworn staffing is 695 officers.

The 170"^ Police Academy began Field Training on November 1, 2014 There are
currently 35 police officers in the Field Training program.
The 171^' Police Academy started with 60 Police Officer Trainees (POTs) and currently
has 44 POTs. Graduation is April 3, 2015.

Per the Bi-Annual Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Budget, OPD's FY 14-15 budgeted sworn strength is
722 officers. This total includes 25 officers from the 2011 Department of Justice/Commimity
Oriented Policing Services (DOJ/COPS) Hiring Grant; 10 officers from the 2013 DOJ/COPS
Hiring Grant; 15 officers from the 2014 COPS grant, and approximately 63 officers associated
with Measure Y.
As of December 31, 2014, 52 sworn members and 14 POTs were Oakland residents. Figure 1
(Attachment I, page 1) shows that most officers live outside of Oakland, and even outside of
Alameda County .'Only seven percent of current sworn members are City of Oakland residents,
the chart depicts where the balance resides. Special emphasis is placed on attracting and hiring a
diverse force that includes Oakland residents.

Item"
Public Safety Committee
February 24, 2014

John A. Flores, Interim City Administrator

Subject Monthly Police Staffing Report

Date-January 24, 2015

Page 3

OPD Hiring / Full Police Staffing Plan

The Oakland City Council passed Resolution No. 84767 C M S. on December 10, 2013, which
among other mandates, requires that the City Administrator or his or her designee present a
"Hiring Plan showing the timeline for achieving OPD Budgeted Staffing to achieve Sworn and
Police-Support Civilian staffing levels as quickly as possible ("OPD Hiring Plan"), and that the
"Hiring Plan" shall include month-by-month projections of expected staffing levels. The City
Council subsequently passed the "Implementation of Budgeted Police Staffing," on June 3, 2014,
which adopts the "staffing projections in the OPD Hiring/Full Police Staffing to the April 29,
2014 Public Safety Committee as the current OPD Hiring Plan " Table 2 below provides data on
staffing and projections as reported in the April 29, 2014 "Full Staffing Report" and the actuals
as reported m the staffing levels as of December 31, 2014. Table 3 provides a summary of the
Table 2 Staffing Projections.
Table 2 Staffing Projections
Staffing Projections in the April 29, 2014 OPD Hiring /Full Police Staffing Report
2014
2015
FY 14-15 July
Filled 646
Attrition
(5)
40
Hires
Ending Filled 681
Authorized 707
Over/(Under) (26)

Aug
681

Sep
676

Oct
691

Nov
726

Dec
721

Jan
716

Feb
711

Mar
706

Apr
701

May Jun
696 691

(5)
0
676
707
(31)

(5)
20
691
707
(16)

(5)
40
726
707
19

(5)
0
721
707
14

(5)
0
716
707
9

(5)
0
711
707
4

(5)
0
706
707

(5)
0
701
707

(5)
0
696
707

(1)

(6)

(11)

(5)
(5)
0
0
691 686
707 707
(16) (21)

Staffing Projections through December 31, 2014

2014
FY 14-15 July
Filled 647
Attrition
(4)
34
Hires
Ending Filled 677
Authorized
Over (Under)
Authorized
Hiring Plan
Over (Under)
Adopted Hiring
Plan

2015

Aug
677

Sep
667

707

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

684 715 ' 705 695 689 683 677
711 705
(4)
(4) (10) (10)
(6)
(6)
(6)
(6)
(11)
(6)
(6)
1 ' 21
35
0
0
0
0
0
40
0
0
667
684 715 705 695 689 683 677 711
705 699
707
707 707 707 722 722 722 722 722 722 722

(30)
681

(40)
676

(23)

691

(4)

(9)

(27)

726

(2)
721

(W

(16)

(39)
706

(45)
701

(11)
696

(17)
691

(23)

716

(33)
711

(21)

(22)

(23)

(24)

75

14

13

Item:
Public Safety Committee
February 24, 2014

686

John A. Flores, Interim City Administrator

Subject: Monthly Police Staffing Report

Date: January 24, 2015

Page 4

Table 3" Summary of Staffing Projections through December 31, 2014

Attrition
Hires
Net Change
Yearly Average Attrition Rate
Average Ending Filled
Average Authorized FTE
Average FTE Over (Under) Hiring Plan (April 29, 2014 Projection) for Year
Average monthly FTE deviation from Hiring Plan (April 29, 2014 Projection)
Early Warning Policy
Two 10-member Lateral/Post-Academy Graduate courses are recommended to address the
continuous reduction in staffing associated in the "Early Warning Policy" and based on staffing
projections identified in the Table 3 above for period ending December 31, 2014 The first
Lateral/Post-Academy course is proposed to begin in February 2015 and the second in May
2015 This recommendation would help address future attrition that falls below the April 2014
Hiring Plan in January, February and March 2015 An additional Basic Academy is
recommended to begin in November 2015. This Basic Academy would enroll 40 POTs - instead
of the usual 60 POTs - in order to maintain staffing levels during FY 15-16.
Additional Figures and Tables
In Attachment I, Figure 2 and Tables 4 through 17, appended to this report, show historical,
current, and projected staffing data as detailed below. Additionally, Attachment 11 is provided to
provide a visual explanation of the process OPD follows for recruiting and training new sworn
officers. Attachment III provides recent 2014 reports that outline OPD efforts to confront sworn
attrition and create alternative hiring processes.
Attachment I
Figure 2
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6&7
Table 8
Table 9
Table 10& 10(a)
Table 11
Table 12
Table 13

Residency of sworn OPD members (page 1)

Demographics of Sworn OPD Members (page 1)
Recruitment strategies (page 2)
Staffing Fimding Sources for FY 14-15 (page 3)
Budget Authorized Positions (page 3)
Sworn staffing by year from FY 10-11 through FY 15-16 (pages 4-6)
Sworn Attrition Data (page 7)
Sworn Attrition Chart (page 8-10)
Attrifion of Oakland residents in the testing and hiring process (page 10)
Demographic Information on Previous Academies (page 10)
Item:
Public Safety Committee
February 24, 2014

John A. Flores, Interim City Administrator

Subject: Monthly Police Staffing Report

Date: January 24, 2015
Table 14a
Table 14b
Table 15
Table 16
Table 17
Attachment II

Page 5

OPD Recruitment Data - 2014 Academies (pages 11-12)

OPD Recruitment Data, Lateral Transitional Courses (page 13)
Patrol Data (page 13)
Field Training Data (page 14)
Civilian Vacancies in OPD (page 14)
Hiring Process for Sworn Personnel

Attachment III
Attrition / Retention Action Plan Report (2014)
Attachment A - Attrition Assessment/Retention Action Plan (2014)
Attachment B - Employee Retention Plan for the Oakland Police
Department (2014)

PUBLIC OUTREACH / INTEREST

The Department continues to actively recruit candidates for the positions of police officer trainee
and lateral / post-academy graduate police officer. Recruitment efforts focus on selective
language candidates throughout the testing and selection process. OPD is also working with
community leaders and local schools and colleges to improve community involvement and to
increase the number of people from diverse backgrounds and Oakland residents applying for jobs
with OPD. In addition to the strategies outlined above, staff continues to host community
partnership meetings in an effort to solicit feedback on current outreach strategies and to
encourage recommendations Staff has met with several community organizations and received
positive feedback and useful input on recruiting efforts Staff is working with community
organizations to conduct hiring workshops, to be held at various community organization offices,
throughout the City.
The Recruiting and Backgrounds staff attended or conducted the events listed below during
December 2014:

Practice Physical Ability Test (6"" & Washington Parking Lot, Oakland) (Attendees. 25)
Police Officer Trainee Test Workshop (45 attendees)

Item:
Public Safety Committee
February 24, 2014

John A. Flores, Interim City Administrator

Subject: Monthly Police Staffing Report

Date: January 24, 2015

Page 6

COORDINATION
The Department works with the Human Resources Management to complete the necessary steps
associated with completing an academy. The City Attorney's Office was consulted in
preparation of this report.
COST SUMMARY / IMPLICATIONS
A separate Agenda Report and Resolution are being submitted to address the cost of two
Lateral/Post-Academy courses. The projected cost of these two courses is $868,579.
SUSTAINABLE OPPORTUNITIES
Economic: There are no economic opportunities associated with this report.
Environmental: There are no environmental opportunities associated with this report.
Social Equity: Hiring more police officers will provide additional resources, thereby enhancing
public safety efforts.
For questions concerning the contents of this report, please contact David Downing, Deputy
Chief of the Bureau of Services, at 510-238-7620.

Respectfully submitted.

SEAN WHENT
Chief of Police
Oakland Police Department

Prepared by
David Downing
Deputy Chief of Police
Oakland Police Department

Attachment I: Data Tables

Attachment II: Hiring Process for Sworn Personnel
Attachment III: Attrition/Retention Action Plan (which includes Attachment A "Attrition
Assessment/Retention Action Plan," dated July 22, 2014 & Attachment B "Employee Retention
Plan for the Oakland Police Department," dated February 25, 2014
,

Item:
Public Safety Committee
February 24, 2014

Figure 2. Residency of Sworn OPD Members

Sonoma 1%_

31 Dec 14
-Stanislaus 1%

Solano 10%_

Ik

Alameda (not
including Oakland)
26%

_ Other (4 or fewer)
2%

/ ^ M a r i n 1%

Contra Costa 35%

-Sacramento 1%
'"^^San Franciso 3%
-._San Joaquin 7%
O.ikland 7%
Santa Clara 3%

.San Mateo 3%

Table 4. Demographics of Sworn OPD Members

Race
White
Black
Asian
Hispanic
Other *
Female
Male

US 2010
Census
34.5%
28.0%
16 8%
25.4%

OPD
2013
43 0%
20.0%
20.9%
19.0%

OPD
2014
42 0%
18.8%
12.7%
21.2%
5.3%

OPD
2015
41.8%
18.3%
12.2%
22.5%
5.2%

14 3%**
85.7%**

12.0%
88 0%

12.0%
88 0%

11 7%
88.3%

* Other includes Unknown, Native American, and

Undeclared, Data as of 1/1/2015
** 2007 data U S Department of Justice Office of
Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics, Local
Police Department, 2007

Attachment I
Page 1

Table 5. Current Recruitment Strategies - Outreach/Media Activity

ON-GOING / IN PROGRESS RECRUITMENT STRATEGIES
Partnerships with Oakland / local pastors, clergy and Neighborhood Services Coordinators who
have existing relationships with community members and events. Each event will be advertised
on participating organization website and atmoimced regularly at organization events
Attend all city-wide recruiting events
Participation with professional associations / organizations (PAOs) that provide services to nonEnglish speaking community members, including Asian/Latino PAOs
Host informational workshops at Oakland/local high schools
Attend military job fairs and local ROTC programs
Ensure Oakland/local media (newspaper, internet, press organizations/associations) outreach
and advertisement, including outreach to pre-selected language specification audiences by way
of El Mundo, Univision, Sing Tao, Unity Council, etc.
Advance relationships with criminal justice and social science directors of Oakland/Local
universities/college/high schools
Attend career events/fairs with local faith-based communities to increase awareness and
Oakland residents' participation
Revamp the oral board interview workshop
Post Monthly Job/Workshop Announcements on Community Partners Websites
Continue to seek resources to create a feeder program into the Police Cadet program to improve
community relationships and increase Oakland residency participation

Attachment I
Page 2

Table 6 & 7. Staff Funding Sources for Sworn and Civilian Positions for FY 14 - 15
FTE
Sworn Positions
General Fund: General Purpose 606
Alameda Co. Vehicle Abatement
1
Measure Y
63
Traffic Safety Fund
2
COPS 2011
25
COPS 2013
10
15
COPS 2014
Grand Total 722

Civilian Positions
General Fund General Purpose
Alameda Co Vehicle Abatement
Measure Y
Traffic Safety Fund
False Alarm Reduction Program
US Department of Justice
State of California
Workers' Comp Insurance
Grand Total

FTE
408.20
1 00
.35
15 65
6 50
3 00
1.65
2 00
438.35

Table 8. Budget Authorized Positions

Position
Sworn

Budget Authorized Positions Authorized

Filled
+1Chief of Police
1
1
0
Assistant Chief
1
1
0
Deputy Chief
3
3
0
Captain
9
10
-1
Lieutenant
26
27
-1
Sergeants
125
124
+1
Police Officers
530
556
-26
Total Sworn
722
695
-27
Non-Sworn
Full-time and Part-time
438 35
395.2
-43.15*
Total Personnel
1160.2
1090.2
-70
*Total Non-Sworn Vacancies includes those positions for whic 1 staff has been hired but has
not yet begun employment

Attachment I
Page 3

Table 9. Sworn Staffing by Fiscal Year with Actual and Projected Attrition
F Y 10-1 1
- Filled
Layoffs
Attrition
Hires
Ending
Filled
Authorized
FTE
Over/
(Under)

F Y 11-12
Filled
Attrition
Hires

Jul-10
775

Aug10
689

Oct-10
681

Sep-10
684 _
!

(6)
0

' (7)
2

689

684

723
(34)

Jul-11
637
1

Ending
632
Filled
Authorized
FTE
636
Over/ *
(Under) . (4)

(7)7"; "
q

681

674

723

723

_ 72_3

(39)

(42)

(49)

Aug11
632
(2)
25

'

Sep-11
, 655

Oct-11
653

1(4) "

__65_5 _J___653__
636

636

Nov10
674

May11
647

Feb-11
653

1 Mar-11

Apr-11
657

(5)
0

" (1)
10

*
I

" (10) " [ . (6)

0
0
^

(4)
0

653

662

657

_647

641

637

72_3_ _ ____7^3 __ _ 669

669 _^ ;

669

669

(53)

(7) . ;

(12)

(22)

1 Dec-10
670

Jan-11
658

"(4)
0

7 "(12") ;

670

658

Nov11
647

(6).
0

647

645

636
11

(16)

(65)

Dec-11
645
; /(4)

Jan-12
643

Feb-12
651

: (3) 7..

(6)
1 _

Mar-12
659

(5)7.

Jun-11
641_

669

(28)

. ^ (32)

MayApr-12
12
, 652
657
;
/(57._ "(6)

Jun-12
646
;

663

Average
Ending Filled

(6)

Monthly A v g
Attrition Rate

669

.(1)
0

11

JJ3

651

659

657

652

646

645

636

636

661

661

661

661

661

661

(10)

(2)

(4)

(9). . ;

(15)

(16)

FY Totals
(134)
Net Change
(80)
Total Layoffs
Total
Attrition
(71)
13
Total Hires

FY Totals
9 Net Change
(45) Total Attrition
53 Total Hires
649

19

17

(4)

Attachment I
Page 4

Average
Ending Filled

Monthly Avg
Attrition Rate

Table 9. Sworn Staffing by Fiscal Year with Actual and Projected Attrition (continued)
FY 12-13 Begin Two Academies
Jul-12 1
FY 12-13
Filled
645
Attrition . ( 3 ) .
Hires

_ 1

Aug12
643

Sep-12
636

(9)

(5)

J.

Oct-12
631
" (3)". ;

_ _q

Ending
F i l l e d ^ ____643__ _ 6 3 6 _
Authorized
613
FTE
613
Over/ '
(Under) ^ 30
21

Nov12
628

Dec-12
627

Jan-13
620

Feb-13
613

(3)

"(7)

(7)

_ 2_

_ 0

j613

6n

648

(2)

_j527_____

62J)^

613

613

613

613

633

633

633

18

15

14

(20)

(22)

15

7.'(9)777(87".7 (4) 7!

Ending
Filled . . . 6 2 4 . .
Authorized
FTE
665 _
" Over/(Und
er) . (41)
gl67tH'Acade

39

628

36

(7)

(8)
0

; _ 0

Jun-13
633

'. 4_

Jan-14
626

Feb-14
624

Mar14
615

44 _

Total Hires

630

Average
Ending Filled

(5)

Monthly A v g
Attrition Rate

16
(71)

FY Totals
Net Change
Total Attrition
Total Hires

633

631

633

633

633

(2)

May14
654

47,

_q

87
632

615

643

639

634

626

624;

615

612

654__

649

647

665

665_

665

665

..... 675___.

675

675

675

j675

675

675_

(51)

(60)

(63)

(21)

(50)

(22)
(26)
(31) ' (49)
j 168th Academy (Sep 30 - Apr 4)

idetny (D ecpS^

Cy

. (26)

A C S O ( M a r 17-Sept 22)
fl^OtMcaderriyjiApi

Attachment I
Page 5

Jun-14
649

" J2) 7 ^(9)7 7 (3)^.r;^(5).7^71(5)L1 7(2)7""

0

FY Totals
Net Change
Total Attrition

(58)

641

1 Apr-14
612

(14)

1 _(2)'"
_q_____

l^i^7tli"A( ;ademy i-^

F Y 13-14 - Two Academies Budgeted (168th and 169th)

NovJulAug13
Dec-13
FY 13-14
13
13
Sep-13 Oct-13 i
624
634
Filled
631
615
643
639
Attrition \ .(7) .
(12)
(5)_. .
0

i'

May13
641

Apr-13
648

(2)_;

631

166th Academy

Hu^es

Mar-13
611

(28)

Average
Ending Filled

Change attrition rate

June 2014
Monthly A v g
(6)
Attrition Rate

Table 9. Sworn Staffing by Fiscal Year with Actual and Projected Attrition (continued)
FY 14-15 - Two Academy Budgeted (170th, 171st)
JulAugNovFY 14-15
14
14
Sep-14 Oct-14
14
Dec-14 Jan-15
i^Tpgjj 695
647
684
Filled
677
667
715
Attrition '"""(47 '""(11)" '7^47"; _(4)7!"...^(J.o)...
.16)._
Hires _ __34
21
35 [ 0
0
Ending
677
715
Filled
667_ _ 684
705
689
Authorized
707
722
FTE _707 _ _707 _ 707
707
Over/
(Under)
(30) .(40)
8
.(33)
(23) ^ .
.(2)..
l:'l69th (Dec-J u l ) ' ^ ^ ; |
ACSO (Mar 17-Sept I12)
1
fH'70th:Kcaaemy^CApi^C)ft)^171 St Academy (Sep 29 - Apr)

Feb-15
689

_(6)7".
0

Mar-15
683

May15
Jun-15
711
705
76).... ...(6). .

Apr-15
677

.. (61__.,..76).
0
_^40

677

711

__705 _

699

_ 722 _ .._ 722

722

.722 _

722__

683

. J39i ^._.(45)_ . (.1.1).._

FY Totals
Net Change
J79) Total Attrition
131 , Total Hires
Average
^692 Endmg Filled
58

(17j. _.._.(2.3.).

J6)

i Monthly Avg
i Attrition Rate

172ria Acaaerny (Apr-Oct)

FY 15-16- Two Academies Budgeted (172nd & 173rd)
Aug1
NovFY 15-16 Jul-15
15 i Sep-15 1 Oct-15
15
699
681
Filled
693
687
715
Attrition . (6).7;i (6)1' ^ 7(6). .".76) ] . (6).'
Hires
Endmg

_ 0

0_

693
687
681 _ _ 715
709
Filled_
Authorized
FTE_ 722
___722 _ -...722
..722.....__._722__.
Over/ *
(Under)
(29)
(35)
(41)
(7)
.j;!3)
172nd Academy ('A"pr:o6t)'' , ,
. '
.
173rd Academy (Jul - Dec)

Attachment I
Page 6

1 Dec-15 Jan-16
709

743

Feb-16
121

Mar16
731

May16
719

Apr-16
725

1 Jun-16
713

._(6)7 '[ (6)7 ....(6)7 . ^ ( 6 ) " . 7 (6) \ . (6)7 \

40
_743

0_

..737 _ _732

722

JT22_

722

21

..J 5..

J725 _

719

722

722

3..___..(3).

7 j !...

.(6)"
0

J7q7_

722

722

(9)

(15)

FY Totals
Net Change
17(72) Total Attrition
14

80
.713

Total Hires
Average
Ending Filled

(6)

Monthly Avg
Attrition Rate

Table 10. - Sworn Attrition Data: January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (12 month
average is 5.66%)
Reason/Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
Disabilityr!,''^ "lUi
"C: ii7'
If
-'Ketifemehi'.'^ ; ;7ii
7""T:; "v"l6'
2
1
Resignation
1
1
2
1
1
9
Resignati.on,^^^
; 17
Other Xgericy^
7:;;A,;7-'"'7'
7"v.7^
' ',"7:7M'.
Service
Retirement
2
1 2
1
1
1
1
7 .<>"16:
'-f!i2-: if Si'? "'Kr iv.'lO'^
"JerniihatiohSC"; 'B"f_7"74:: JHi'',i''?
I.: ^U.
Deceased
' '7'0
%.,2?
2rf
68
>',-8.
6
'
i
^
10
10
Grand Total "-;
' ~ 4/. <.llr,: ^ '"^

Table 10a. Sworn Attrition Analysis January 1,2014 through December 31, 2014
The below table identifies deviations/shortfalls between projected and actual staffing levels for
sworn staffing from January through December 2014.During the period of January through
December 2014, OPD was below the projected average monthly attrition. The projection was 6
per month for an annual of 72 and the actual for same 12-month period was 68.
Reason for Separation
Disability Retirement
Resignation
Resignation - Other Agency
Service Retirement
Termination

Attachment I
Page 7

Average Age at Separation

46.7
31.3
35.8
51.7
32.3

Number of Separations
16
9
17
16
10

Table 11. Sworn Attrition Chart: January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014
Separation Date
1/13/2014
1/22/2014
2/2/2014
2/7/2014
2/20/2014
2/20/2014
2/24/2014
2/24/2014
2/24/2014
2/25/2014
3/1/2014
3/20/2014
3/21/2014
3/21/2014
4/5/2014
4/18/2014
4/18/2014
4/19/2014
5/9/2014
5/9/2014
5/16/2014
5/16/2014
5/19/2014
6/15/2014
6/20/2014
7/19/2014
7/19/2014
7/24/2014
7/26/2014
8/1/2014
8/2/2014
8/2/2014
8/2/2014
8/2/2014
8/5/2014
8/9/2014
8/12/2014
8/22/2014
8/22/2014

Attachment I
Pages

Separation Reason
Resignation
Disability retired, on-duty
Resignation
Resignation
Disability retired, on-duty
Disability retired, on-duty
Discharged on Probation
Discharged on Probation
Termination
Discharged on Probation
Service Retirement
Termination
Disability retired, on-duty
Disability retired, on-duty
Resignation
Disability retired, on-duty
Disability retired, on-duty
Service Retirement
Service Retirement
Service Retirement
Resignation
Resignation
Resignation
Service Retirement
Disability retired, on-duty
Service Retirement
Disability retired, on-duty
Resignation
Service Retirement
Resignation
Resignation
Resignation
Resignation
Resignation
Resignation
Resignation
Resignation
Service Retirement
Disability retired, on-duty

Title
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Sergeant of Police (PERS)
Sergeant of Police (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Sergeant of Police (PERS)
Lieutenant of Police (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Sergeant of Police (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Sergeant of Police (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Sergeant of Police (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)

Sworn Attrition Chart: January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (continued)
Separation Date
8/24/2014
9/4/2014
9/4/2014
9/21/2014
9/29/2014
10/16/2014
10/17/2014
10/20/2014
10/21/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/11/2014
11/13/2014
11/15/2014
11/21/2014
11/21/2014
11/21/2014
11/21/2014
11/26/2014
12/3/2014
12/19/2014
12/19/2014
12/19/2014
12/19/2014
12/19/2014
12/20/2014
12/20/2014
12/21/2014
12/26/2014

Attachment I
Page 9

Separation Reason
Resignation
Discharged on Probation
Discharged on Probation
Resignation
Resignation
Termination
Disability retired, on-duty
Resignation
Resignation
Discharged
Discharged
Resignation
Service Retirement
Resignation
Disability retired, on-duty
Disability retired, on-duty
Disability retired, on-duty
Disability retired, on-duty
Resignation
Service Retirement
Disability retired, on-duty
Service Retirement
Resignation
Service Retirement
Resignation
Service Retirement
Service Retirement
Service Retirement
Service Retirement

Title
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Lieutenant of Police (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Captain of Police (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Sergeant of Police (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Deputy Chief of Police (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Lieutenant of Police (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)
Police Officer (PERS)

Table 12. Attrition of Oakland Residents in the Testing and Hiring Process
Police Hiring Steps 166"'
Oakland Residents
Applications Received 282
Invited to
85
Physical Ability Test (PAT)
Attended PAT
77
Invited to Written 254
Attended Written 155
Invited to Oral Interview
72
63
Attended Oral Interview
Background &
48
Character Review
7
Invited to Academy
3
Graduated from Academy

167th

168'"*

169th

186

415

271

59

371

262

267

337

44
165
112
42
39

168
151
133
79
66

145
138
123
76
59

194
147
113
86
55

110
94
77
44
33

19

40

35

43

25

6
3

6
6

3
2

1
1

10
10

15
TBD

ACSO** 170th

316

171st
501

Table 13. Demographic Information on Previous Academies

Class

Starting
Date

Starting
Number

166th

17 Sep 12

57

167th

25 Mar 13

51

168th

30 Sep 13

57

Lateral 9Decl3

169"^

30 Dec 13

55

ACSO

17 Mar 14

24

170'"

28 Apr 14

57

Lateral 22 Sept 14

29 Sept 14

60

171'

Attachment I
Page 10

Gender
15 Females
42 Males
7 Females
44 Males
8 Females
49 Males
4 Males
8 Females
47 Males
3 Females
21 Males
9 Females
48 Males
1 Female
6 Males
10 Females
50 Males

Oakland
Residency
7
6
6
0
2
1
5
0
15

Language
8 Cantonese/Mandarin
4 Spanish
5 Cantonese/Mandarin
12 Spanish
0 Cantonese/Mandarin
19 Spanish
0 Cantonese/Mandarin
1 Spanish
0 Cantonese/Mandarin
13 Spanish
3 Cantonese/Mandariri
3 Spanish
3 Cantonese/Mandarin
10 Spanish
0 Cantonese/Mandarin
2 Spanish
5 Cantonese/Mandarin
9 Spanish

Ending
Number
39
36
47
4
34
13
35
7
Pending

Table 14(a). OPD Recruitment Data - 2014 Academies

Percent of Percent of
Police
Percent Percent Number of General Oakland
Hiring
Testing/
Total
of
Not
Oakland
Residents
Total
Steps:
Time Frame
Total Advanced Residents Oakland
Not
170th Academy
Advanced
Residents
9/19/2013 to
Applications
10/11/2013
2,101 100%
0%
224
11%
0%
12/17/2013 to
Received
1/3/2014
Invited to
2,036
97%
-3%
184
9%
-18%
PAT
Attended
PAT

10/19/2013
1/11/2014

941

45%

-55%

111

5%

-40%

899

43%

-57%

105

5%

-57%

796

38%

-62%

99

5%

54%

579

28%

-72%

86

4%

-47%

506

24%

-76%

55

3%

-30%

348

17%

-83%

43

2%

-23%

4/28/2014

57

3%

-97%

10

.05%

0%

10/31/2014

35

2%

98%

10

.05%

0%

Invited to
Written
Attended
Written
Invited to
Oral Interview
Attended
Oral Interview
Referred to OPD
on eligibility list
Invited to
Academy
Graduated
Academy

Attachment I
Page 11

11/6/2013
1/23/2014

12/9/2013
12/10/2013
2/10/2014
2/11/2014
1/10/2014
2/28/2014

Table 14(a). OPD Recruitment Data - 2014 Academies (continued)

Percent of
Police
Number
Percent Percent
General
Hiring
Testing/
of
of
Total
Not
Total
Steps:
Time Frame
Oakland
Total Advanced
Oakland
171" Academy
Residents
Residents
1/15-29/2014
Applications
2/19-3/4/2014 2,510 100%
0%
501
20%
Received
3/12-28/2014
2,416 96%
-4%
Invited to PAT
476
19%
2/8/2014
4/12/2014
Attended PAT
1,138 45%
-55%
174
7%
6/14/2014
Invited to
1,055 42%
-58%
150
6%
Written
2/27/2014
3/242014
Attended
912
36%
-64%
127
5%
3/25/2014
Written
5/6-7/2014
Invited to Oral
651
26%
-74%
74
3%
Interview
3/31/2014
4/1/2014
4/28/2014
Attended Oral
492
20%
-80%
2%
60
5/22/2014
Interview
6/16/2014
6/23/2014
4/17/2014
Referred to
6/25/2014
OPD on
369
15%
-85%
42
2%
7/25/2014
eligibility list
Invited to
9/29/2014
60
2%
98%
15
1%
Academy
Graduated
TBD
4/3/2015
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Academy

Attachment I
Page 12

Percent of
Oakland
Residents
Not
Advanced
0%
-5%
-65%
-70%

-75%

-85%

-88%

-92%
-97%
TBD

Table 14(b). OPD Recruitment Data, Lateral Transitional Courses

Number
Police Hiring Steps:
of
Testing/
Percent
December 2013-January
Total
Time Frame
Oakland of Total
2014 Lateral Course
Residents
9/16/13 to
2
81
100%
Applications Received
10/12/13
2
10/19/13
30
37%
Invited to PAT
2
10/19/13
30
37%
Invited to Oral Interview
Referred to OPD
10/22/13
2
27
33%
on eligibility list
12/9/13
4
0
5%
Invited to Course
1/31/2014
4
0
0%
Graduated Course

Police Hiring Steps:

September 2014 to
November 2014
Lateral Course
Applications Received
Invited to PAT
Invited to Oral Interview
Referred to OPD
on eligibility list
Invited to Course
Graduated Course

Percent Not
Advanced

-63%
0%
10%
85%
0%
0%

Total

Percent
of Total

Percent
Not
Advanced

Number of
Oakland
Residents

69

100%

0%

38

55%

45%

27

39%

61%

2
2

12/23/2013

11

16%

84%

9/22/2014
11/26/2014

7
5

10%
7%

90%
93%

0
0

Testing/
Time Frame
10/21/2013 to
11/06/2013
11/16/2013
12/7/2013
12/10/2013

Table 15. Patrol Data

Area 1
l " Watch 14
2"" Watch 18
3''' Watch 18
Total 50

Area 2
1" Watch 16
2"" Watch 15
3'" Watch 16
Total 47

Number of
officers
assigned to
patrol" 250
Number of
officers
36
31
assigned to
evening shifts
Note Open beats are covered on overtime.

Attachment I
Page 13

Area 3
1" Watch 17
2"" Watch 16
3'" Watch 15
Total 48

Area 4
1" Watch 15
2"" Watch 18
3'''' Watch 16
Total 49

31

34

Area 5
1" Watch 17
2"" Watch 22
3'" Watch 17
Total 56
39

Table 16. Field Training Data

Academy of Origin
OPD 169'" Basic Academy
Alameda County Sheriffs Office
Basic Academy
OPD 170'" Basic Academy

Entered FTO
34

Completed FTO
27

13

Pending

35

Pending

Table 17. Civilian Vacancies in OPD (As of December 31, 2014 there are 30.5 vacancies - this
number excludes positions where staff have been hired but have not started work)
Job Classification

Vacancies

Authorized

Accountant II

Criminalist II

17

Dispatchers

Intake Technicians

Latent Print Examiner II

Management Assistant

Police Cadet

67

1.5

Police Operators

Police Records Specialist

54

Police Services Tech II

61

Attachment I
Page 14

Status
HRM Certified eligibility list to be available
by the end of January 2015
OPD: A certified eligible list of CRIM
III applicants provided to hiring manager
on 1/21/15.
OPD: 1 re-instated candidate will
tentatively start on 2/14/15.
HRM: Job posting closed 1/16/15
Screening of 700+ applications
OPD: Working on background checks
using the Operator list to underfill
vacancies until new Dispatcher eligibility
list is available in March 2015 - at which
time any remaining vacancies will be
filled using new list.
HRM- pending certification of additional
names to interview
OPD: Pending Hiring Manager decision
HRM Pending eligibility list to be
certified by 2/9/15
HRM. Pending recruitment exam
meeting
OPD: Pending background clearance by
end of January 2015 Selective Language
- Spanish
OPD: 2 pending background clearance
HRM Pending additional candidate
name from Spanish Selective list
OPD: Pending background clearance

Steps in the Oakland Police Department Hiring Process

for Sworn Personnel
Applicant Applies through NEOGov for the Police Officer
Trainee position**

Applicant applies for a Lateral/Post Academy Graduate

Transitional Course***

Part I - Initial Testing

Part I - Initial Testing

Completion of Physical Ability Test (PAT)

Completion of Physical Ability Test (PAT)

Satisfactory performance on Written Examination (score of 45)

Satisfactory performance in Oral Interview (Candidates are

required to turn in a completed Personal History Statement (PHS)
at the time of the Oral Interview)

Satisfactory performance in Oral Interview (Candidates are

required to turn in a completed Personal History Statement (PHS)
at the time of the Oral Interview)
Part II - Background, Character & Medical

Part II - Background, Character & Medical

Clear the PHS screening for POST dimensions

Clear the PHS screening for the POST dimensions.

Receive Conditional Job Offer

Pass Polygraph Examination

si/
Pass Psychological Examination
Investigation Pass Medical Examination
Attachment 2
Page 1

Receive Conditional Job Offer

si/
Pass Polygraph Examination
Pass Psychological Examination

si/

Pass Medical Examination

si/

Satisfactorily complete Background

Satisfactorily complete Background Investigation

si/
si/

Pass Character Review Hiring Panel

sP
Part III - Basic Academy

Pass Character Review Hiring Panel

Part III - External Academy

si/

Part HI - Lateral/PAG Transitional Course

,s!/

s]/
' Hired by OPD as a police
officer trainee (POT),
successfully complete all
components of the OPD-run 27
week training academy

si/
Sworn in as a Police Officer
day of graduation and enters
field training.

Hired by OPD as a police

officer trainee (POT)
determination made to send to
an external basic academy.
OPD pays for training at
partnering law enforcement
agency (i.e. Alameda County
Sheriff academy). POT
successfully completes all
components of the externallyrun 26-27 week training
academy

Entering as either a former officer from another police

department, or as a POST Academy Graduate****, and
employed as a sworn OPD police officer, successfully complete
the 10-12-week OPD-run Lateral/PAG Transitional Course.

si/
Sworn in as a Police Officer
day of graduation

Part IV - Field Training

Attachment 2
Page 2

^l/
Employed by OPD as a police officer, successfully complete all components of the 16-week OPD Field Training Program.

4/
Part IV - Field Training

4/
Employed by OPD as a police officer, successfully complete all components of the 16-week OPD Field Training Program.
4/
Part V - Regular OPD Police Officer
* Basic Police Officer Academies: Basic officer academies are the most common method for employing new officers. In basic
academies, OPD operates a certified POST academy with OPD personnel. Recruitment is conducted by advertising on numerous
newspapers, radio stations, commimity events before the testing starts for a new academy, so as to receive thousands of candidates and
ultimately select the most qualified individuals with the greatest promise to succeed in the academy. Beyond the academy, OPD seeks
applicants who will^lso succeed in field training and ultimately become highly-qualified officers who meet OPD's high standards for
integrity, work ethic and an ability to serve Oakland's diverse communities. POTs receive training in all POST (police officer standard
testing) Performance Objectives, as well as several department-specific objectives
**External Academies: The Oakland Police Department at times has the opportunity to send Oakland basic academy applicants to
basic academies operated by other law enforcement agencies, such as Alameda County Sheriffs Office (ACSO) and or Santa Clara
County Sheriffs Department (SCCSD). These are Police Officer Standard Testing (POST) certified academies. These academies
differ from OPD basic academies in that they focus specifically on POST requirements. ACSO's academies, offered twice a year, tram
over-twenty different law enforcement agency candidates from throughout the greater Bay Area. The training is delivered in a highstress and highly disciplined format, similar to military-type basic training.
***Lateral Transitional Course (Lateral Academies): The Oakland Police Department can hire both experienced officers from
other law enforcement agencies or Post Academy Graduates (PAG), (such as ASCO or from several other California training
academies, where applicants pay to enter a basic police academy (non-affiliate). These individuals come to OPD with POST
certificates and only require a ten-twelve-week training program at OPD on "department-specific" objectives before entering the
sixteen-week field training program. These candidates are hired as police officers on the first day of employment
Attachment 2
Page 3

iiWi

' .

..

'

L,,.,; .VX--,Subject?Aytior^^^

"

*%i-r'".,-^j>lfe3Q.2oi4 A,..'.. ;."':"-"'^

,., i-r...

'',.-:>.i5..-i,

..-I'.i

frilefemeSl^cM^
,officers'Withlatgreaterbreadth-opskiils. ,
^

g.
'

ajs*.
WSh,v
'

Ife''" >^='

-.1

Page2,' , --s "'

'I'i, , ,i ,

,rt'* -.'..ft >

> /.'IS

an aq)ffiaing sgopWfWtf^jreqtiifii^^
-'.xhy^e^-...
,
,

AttritiontcM''r^iultWbm^sey^^^
';
.totauce,^theirr'numfe.opfficers.;Spme;cMik^
_ \%,.
r oi^ahiaation;iriightlwoihe;tJtaOTp^
= eisev^ere;-A pendtngwav^.ofDaby:DoomigeMerationtretuements tMe^ens tor-f;.
iiBdiK exoenence leifls of pohce4epartmentS;r
,
are mOTe;'liKely^tb..cl^gej<^
^ . ^IiKelv.to cnanffe careers'onceTenterinc<nohcine:.thevav;be4

S4i'

- .

^
.,,5*.. ..i^..

enter'.-.

" '""'^A.' abpiit^tsfetE^Mb*^

'

^ ^ increas6d,attnttonfso aisa can they Iead;to reduced'^anes.andilfenefit^packages

that^^e less likelyJto attract candidates to^^
j
, to'take.TuJI advantageof electipmc:media'm meff^
,
-t. '
^^'The-adoptibn.of'cbcniftimitySb'Ucing^^ bi^iened^metidlitiestoflbUceJa^^
Itnas'increasedme^^^^
:^/depifhiieii&\wilH;1are^^
.

_
\:\

"^Jf - ' 'M

' - advancement, and.fflTMter'^avvarenes^^the^scopepfccnmeftl^^

,
conmumty miistmow Mdresslcontmues to;&ow^fc~
-J

As.stateam,the,februare;25;20l|?rei^^^^^

ft"''

is.,>

, l(6|bfficefs;per mbhjfli',,duej^^
njsetyiceretarements,resignatiorisj^ermmations and deaths

mam^tory overtime that staffii^^^

-ri

&

^Subtdct:fAtmtion Reduction/(Retention CampaiaiA^^

. All

, 50150,Duttney,wotudirrauire,-negotiations,*.m

'

Inctease^bhgevity^-pavv-
:.,^.Add3%(|ti^t^^^

mf

ana (x>iuerjC#ia cnanges>to,the existing.

*-3'-f -J'
J

Atme*end}Ot2O130OPDiStai|participatedWai^
^.the^;residtSHp|P4e?^gM2Bd
:,trmningaancl;-sb^^^^

- -l'

:;.%&J.r^ .y;^' -

i
^'

7^:^
^ Jj
'^

It-'
, ;r:nckSsesrcoiisistedpftExcelfRoweriRpmt,^fflid,oi
fW' - 4'.^= "'development;*/'^'- ..^v
--''^'-c'-tj:>
fi&r

IJI?

^career*.
-

^, ;/prfer^b|toUc^^^^^
" ^ feffiiar'las^tll^ie'^^
- * ' ' L ' /ifV'^-

' '' "

,v

, InlthejpastfiMtfj'OPKa^elbiM
' /^^ 1= Techniciansi roiiceiRecords SnecialKSts and Foiiceloervice lecnnicians.yAIl oi' tnese,;traMm

=^1?? 'j.

'

hM

c4

-^^.-^
i \ ^"^V -S't
-

-^iW.^Jii^^i^--,

k.--

-sC :5

felt.; I f -i

ijf^-^ HeBiy*Iai,GarfiiMi:inteHkfi\ei^J^^^
.. .?<Su!}ie<,Attntion'Rj&ia(^onCRfitentioiC^m
CPagqf5;:i:i:0
-

1 >,-...

'

-S

....

.. -"-

'

W'i
'1%.

'4*"' 'if
fit " ^ ^ f I f l 34i000f H'-'-fk:'
ft. r i f F "

* Npte^|nje:$8|l,000;fbr|Bi!S"progra

. M i ! ; ' ; ,/ - f^.^PubUclSafe^lBommittM'-?

- *

'

-'

1111 II. s fl-

3;:

,.53.

Responsibility

Class

Sworn*: |No<creatioh of spedalized units

"ocop
s^pfeass if274Mar4l4?j#
ScrpMHoppenhamjf
'2?: ''Bbthlfcl f j i l ^ n o e g b u # | i a r i . f o t a i r ^ ^
iefnpioyeesi,y'j.#?,-s%!^*^"^,^siv -i--,,.! 3,Ce,e,Beluei;4&
OROA':- 1

ilk''

PI
^-.1?

Sv.;..f^-.-r,, fell

-^0;Juha4^

'Sworh'l

:SompJete{lj;j..jf.'^j.;^4i;ii'5>;r^
4Gempeteiaf{will heeai$42K^^^^^
,15|When:current seryice:agreement ends and : -^^K'^
|thereafter)$8i^KfannuallyfoKnewflscaliyear,startingi'<^

,iaTlhualtyJh;new:contraet;agreementijlfJal?M^^
#^1fpiaall!pal?rit||Bl^-r,^^^ i f e ^ u ^ - : ? : ^ *
lwrthiwpione,yeariextensionpphonsir;Repof:t,tO-cpunc!l^
''increase-cdnfrart=by^$25J000r.%
tanpUaJ,toicoye|^iijcrease injr, \ ,
-^sewiceidemandsr-'^-if<.---%-,^^^1
r t ' l i ' ",,6fift"pfrpoi|(^jiH^^
"-f
"Cee'SeTuCr
'
nCivllian ;iR^tillowofJfl^tgnnie^^
'iNelrt'^SEelp
to>sen(ftb..EhiployeelR^^
'
io'Gdp'*r
PStTII classifications create a t CpenH^^
iconfersWithJaboi:<uniori!aner*approvalifc^
f
i.i'.^,/.v
;
tlReviewjj
t:easlgnmentipolicy.-fr-" s i"-.^---%>
|ebmpieted:i^ngbm| : t ^ S ^ - V / ^ f V ?
r:
^Bbtll.,;^ Maroenitibn'Awaftls GeferhbriylJvV. Jfee^Belueftei-r-rJi"
Programwrecognize^exceptional, ?Penny!Ha>', - i;^^! pay/N'dv , Aarid/orijo.b.well,.dQne5r:v %.y^ -4;
<Botb;r' Wellness Program - Peer Support 7;D$4p'itftlaw;r;.;'\'-"^ :ifpar|l4>'t,..i
j.Gaptl'Hbppehha'uer
4r&'Gritical;|ncidenlRe^

1-

if*

tea.-

ft*

.'.^Attachmeni'A

ATTRITION ASSESSMENT/RETENTION AGTION PLAN

1.

tv

CLASS

Responsibility
m

-Swqrnij rMindatpfifttSve^^
'$'3
teliminate'and/orLreduce'mandatoryAl*;.:
'r,DGiDownmgt
z
fOvertin:ie,requireMents.>-4, -S5%''n''fc-J''*-^''*'"- "'?
#

'

Is

.3i'

f'
m.

St

I-

J
$DGibbwn1rig1wrdtea1cbrntil
jassessmgiWays'toeliminate4nandatory,'OBt!;

*'<*-w',-?r' i , y , * * ' T M 3 r % # f i . . . ' " 1'--.'

f ~ ;

iBotKi:^* fJWeirneM'ifrccii#!cr^
|KeiBctiR^re^?<%| f.tfecefnBir' MVaiiirigCniftJfrdinglappro
,servrces related toscrisiSiPreventionasettf u!l
*mid;rcycle;budget'proposal;,*j/iVr7*^^^ , t 4 '
, help;progfams; HirejAAII andjRIlS to.;staffr^_. .siHoppepnauer;!*"-:^
M \ ' * t i J ' i - 1 i.k--^-iSi,^j--'->. % r i - i H i fi^fv=?il
Javiljanit ;iVfg|wltH\DHRP*^^
r A o j p d p e l o ^ T t f . iDate-irBRje d^Ksiublmitted^a%e^
IbycDIHIRI^^?:^ fstudysfor'Dispataier/Operatorjn^Decemberit
|Penn>Hat^^"^
201>3jandJthe,Gnme tab positions In '.f. - >:
-

J^btH
5 ":B6th;

-..f'*',

-as ,

'"-1

taty-wldejtraYnlhgbffBtedih^'i^^^
iOthe>~skills:Dase,training':.*?; t 4 . , ;
cMent6fthg>i^ram;tI.x ~'"-'5E.'''?

i B c M , ? ;;RecruitmBntJn^^
|mceh\iyVtd'recmlt
-In'
uV '

I'

.,47

'

Aoil]ComelVr-;t
4: iCeelBejue:*,-:- '*
JJ^ICJ;'' S 'fCaptsSOrazcbT&'
;octol^F?^-:t ldentifying*^|elf giiup^^^ I? " v * " - '
tHoppenhauet,'
,
5tBD?due$
^t
Iftbpliennauerf
fitb^budgetyi fI;his*is|a:request-to'fundithis^projectiff
Cee|Beiue#r,',, ,^

r'irVif
-

11, ._

i',**'

s,

,\

-,.\-,,r

J f ; ~ '- ,

V , , , , . S-f.

TS. , - "

'

Iff

4'

t,

AttachmeniA
-^-'.vJ'.'^A^V'i':"
*5ir -

Jl

.... .Jtem:,%*
:->4PubUc-Safe1yiGommitt^' ->->" .

' , !4 ...b^-".

r;!"teOlINCIIgDISTRICT-;Citv-widei , -

9|

.. 'iffll'

i:

t*ii^.il&^Sfl.'ilifcrtlfefeftfe''^

? .11 lute*.**! felfetSg^y'^' h i : J.' V'*.PteMtiA''fett' 'it''',f94tktffcA&ffJtrft^^

?Atfiitiiffeati^.||*i;^lS4i;:
eSeiyi^S:kaiffijlCTtl?St'6

r-A-sr

ill ti'

I5.0,i'#idpyer''i^"i.l';,>,'>'-

f|.p:to.H|ffe -,
'30"toJ,9S5;|r' -

-J.'

' -" ' .

.,' ,- s

^Ml: r ' f .to h'.,.'iSeyeraiilawjeifforcement'iiCTcies'iVs^erei

-- i . n"- '

^'^a-'^ff'''"\':*fs^

; <-;' - . l - ' , .

' ..,-',i

v '

iSurv'CTedjeitieS-'-1/^.'AtinualjAtSiticm-Rate.'''" %
;IBART
'.11

"

"

i.*

y~

jEreriwfit.Wr#K % W;48i(Mfetire^)|*Jf?
3aywaidiE.'-^.'J >2;1 i :
tSan^Pranctsco rSfr'-t
ISiiMSip4-:StM

'5,*i'l

1 ''7^''" '*

'.ft.

5d

*#-5;9i x t

; iconditipns causalfiomihighcnmerate,inakmg me issueropretaimng enroloyeffiivital.

r f r

","#elow:afe:tHe!lcey M^ilpts'.oM^Ei&plbyeeTeMhkk^Surv^.CValu^^^^^^

Work.
iximafltely"*

. ^ - ' r ' l ..1'

^#Sttr:veyJHIst?,llef*s:-

'.p'\

n:.
Jr.-

. .. .jt

Item:;'
Public. Safety,,ebmmittee,.^Februaiy>25,2014
..?:r.,S .

i-

, /'PibUc',Safe|y,*6oTrm

.'d

/<'.'T'; "
S>

iifi. -ii,'^ '

1.

r*,*!':; , >,*>*, / '

'v,

i. ..|>*

to'th^raiime^seltg^
1

^ "

'

'

> '^ ^

i#^\-

id-mainfaimha'a'b3nsistencvin'.:0PD}R^^

T'; 1:7
r.?.; combmwlffliafrwjrganizeaim.an^attempti^^^
,,>Pf'" '.;'
MStafemeritiwilIlie availablMmhhefshPmyito'mipiPveitheCc^^

''fi>l3=';^^^f4mMihg|OT6bl&a-)lyi^^^

i^fO^^^,^'^^^KTstudOTfs|ip^

:lf."%H^>##acAWf*J5->

.-M-.A"-

skflls^tpt^willassist-^

- -

'-'^

/^ '

Rebrua^^^Sgir

<"

X* - ' / ' v '

f S f-^ ^.i;

'

jKf,?-#f . i'-,i^T ,.-Si^iect:-Exmloyee>Kettntion,PIanfotthe..OaI:land'PoliceD.epatt^^

,.
'

,.
PMfkff-^t-i -M-

. *-j;eligibmtyilists;for>^^^

. ,
'1

'

- i|

t V - i ' V / 4 " ' v ' ^''i/i^^^^remiitaentpteto.'addresslthlst'

,.

" -

is

si

- -

* ;and:current employee;SKills levelsito manage'hunian capital.

i i ? * Yt employee'd^elopment/skUr,enhaniment8.

.:

rtnhniiftrtA*riiTintnfiVKniir^!nartftt/Stiidfmt'lntfti

=j;%%fi'
i.'
"
mg^i-Zr.^
'
;
'-1^ / .

'.w?EstabhsnJ^faitor,Program^,tpkeep,veteran,employees\enga^
'-'^%ttfdmce.4iNa^^^
jr. _
:.:

' . ' ' ' l i r:w"iiaj?

, , "

'
,

.
^

, " Item:,
v.
-<P^jS^Gmmmltee'

,
,r
'

' i i l
J

mi

1^

let

W\ ' '^Deanna" J: Saotsya;'iw'Administrator

ty^i^fa:^l^^Ii^t|^^Ot-C^-g^^^^
.3lUki^.

-rlfc^^Av. . . ^ I f v . -!?Page^k^,j..

'"^*lt!,lMbreMexibility{tW
^4 4 t^^ss.asmiiims ;C

1*1.^^1^.-^.',. "1-

!Rrok!tive}y;scJm^ts'iffl
ffitimprovejpit)ductivity|andferBciOTcy. !
if:-'!"' S i ' "

''r'inex-W6rk':Schailde.^>eijinl^
iHexJ^rESch^M^^^
' '^o-''\Rlea^i^"aii^3i^w

' ' ' '- ;

^ i

nsw'MuipinemtJfiM:. staff-tP".
- /*

,. '.,'Vti
^'\'^,<x-^,-

fij^" .4 * : f ' -" 1 J5>Rotatipna|.work;m

l<V''1 ""S'^
. ^^pit)h|5fo's'^to'^hip:ns%^^^

- ,=;*ii-*
classificMdns.ti^

S^p^iaapSi^iiKy^^
8t^?ersoiWlaiid|rtDfesliSny:s^^
I
, , Increase awarenessfand promote a^culture to seek-pnofessional advice ahd assistance
,>-%whenever:nSoM.'*
.X
u
=. %
-<r - > , T
' /o "^i^e MHNiiiSsauraflce'Substarfce:
^fte;ai)0rpxmmte}tpi^i^ $84k annualy.^, Fimding^wiU ne^'to be includ^
' 'os4By'expmding',the}Pefe

.0 ^ 'H I

aufid-addirigi^^fic^iIhcidOTtR^

is!
,3*' 1.
k't

.'n--.'Item":r^..
' j^ublictSafeMdbimnittee
Febi^y25j:2014:^' - '

itf^''-/ ^Mi/"-

.r.

f"./"

'1

IA

'A) ' ^ -r cr^?^ - j^lmplement 'aJsalary i

fear-!-.,'':'
Si*-'iSr-

''^J^.'SfwiyC'-"'^'^ -

'

"^5*^ ^"6*?jS^*chriiai^eq^P^;^iMloW^^

,-s,,..,..

,.'X.^\
ccfetitiye^in^thiihdustiy: \

- "''o"'i^EmplowWIiiOTtifiW;^^^^
, , tTMmngtsiich asMoxjsoft:^^

o, Reque^tyQepaitmffitpf Hun^
^ trammg.programjto address'these nBdSi

iM.'Svv'C'# "- -'^-'^ >^'"\o'"/<PK^de'optioIi5Tdr^wp

, - - . . y.,
m^'^y I ' / r - ' " . i - foc*-5liauctionfin,mahaatory'oymimepj^
--'---^
, ".workj.oyertime-iforswornaBd;non-swom;i- ,
i

rr ^ .

the city-wide
'
.

> .
-

!*5^f5i:<^.A^*^^'.^ .i'-'.,. ';o''^^i^EeaB^'-6^&initiK^^^^

project

Itein:'
, PubhC'S jd&^_ Gbmmitfce^
ISC'*-. -Vj-^'i

' - .

"

"

.P'fPubtic^'S^tyJGonimittee. f y - ,
,
*Pebruary2-5i20rft
^
/

,\\'',

f/ljlfj,,,,'. ^
,1

M ".^-'Vj." 4-,

11' -'''/-hi

'

.'^.^

. e*,^

An

f>.

1*1'