Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 102


























Exhibit List


Katherine Schultz's Questions 1- 14


Katherine Schultz Questions 1-2


Natural Born Citizen by Mountain Publius Goat


What is Putative President Obama's Current U.S. citizenship Status?


The Logical analysis ofa Natural Born Citizen (thebirther.org)


Hawaii FAQ- Obama and Citizenship


Barack Obama's Birth Certificate: Why It Matters: Newsmax (Lists birth acts about all presidents)


Hawaii refuses to veritY President's online COLBs. August 2, 2009 WND article


Obama played hardball in first Chicago campaign



How Hussein Seized the US Senate http://www.stop-obama.org/?p~188


Emmerich de Vattel:

Law of Nations Quote


Vattel's Influence on the term a Natural Born Citizen



DNC Certification Jilinois


DNC Certification Hawaii


The Theory is Now a Conspiracy and Facts Don't Lie: JB Williams

(http://www.canadafreepress.coml2009/williams091209.htm )


DNC Fails to Certify Obama as Eligible in Most States: JB Williams

(http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/15 I27)


RNC Certification Form


Fact Check The Truth About Obama's Birth Certificate



13 th Article of Freedom, CC2009: Continental Congress


Stephen Pidgeon analysis of Hawaii Laws

21. Kenyan Newspaper archived from 2004, openly declares Mr, Obama as Kenyan born.


22. Exhibit 22 Obama Where have all his records gone? WND Article)



The liberties ofa people "ever were or ever will be secure, wile" the transactions Oftheir rulers may be cOlfcealetl

/fIIl11lhem. Patrick Hellry




























The Statements and Claims made herein are the statements and claims of the petitioner's and those statements incorporated herein of others as part of tile public record concerning these

matter. On oath and subject to the laws of perjury, the undersigned petitioner affinn and assert

that the preceding allegations and factual statements, including those factual statements alleged

on information and belief are true to the best of her knowledge, and that she has asserted these claims, being legally competent to testilY to these matters, .and having acted voluntarily without

promise of payment or by threat; in good faith and based upon her understanding of the United

States Constitution and the lIIinois Constitution,


~ndthe duly enacted laws which spring there

On my sacred honor and in witness before my Lord God.



Signed from this location 728 NW Hwy Fox River Grove, IL 60021

Phone 847-304 - 8800 on this 2nd day of December, 2009



lih.rti",· ofa people never "'ere or ever ",ill be secJe, ",hen th. trallsactiolls of their rulers moJ' be c,mceal.Ii


from IhenL Patrick Henry




I "


" \ ,

Dear Katherine,

I wish to express my appreciation for your willingness to· help Mary and me learn about the election

system; especially as relates to McHenry County, but also in reference to state and national elections.

I learned a great deal in speaking with you. I wish to clarify some of the information. I would like to

include this information in the EMERGENCY petition consuming my attention at this time. The last opportunity I had to speak with Judge Prather, she specified I needed to include details. Thus, there are

a few points, I want to be specifically clear about. Numbered, I post them below.

References to specific codes are appreciated as well as any other information that might help to illustrate the election process.


Please briefly list the process by which a candidate gets on the ballot in McHenry County.

A candidate is required to file petitions papers, with the required number of signatures, a statement of candidacy and would also possibly file a loyalty oath during the prescribed filing period


What documents are required of a candidate to prove constitutional eligibility to be on the ballot?

No proof required - Statement of Candidacy form states "qualified voter" and "legally qualified to hold such office"


Please specify how election law and related processes verifies the constitutional eligibility of a candidate for office.

To the best of my knowledge verification is not required and is not part of the filing procedures


What statement or oath is required of candidates swearing eligibility?

A loyalty oath is optional. The Statement of Candidacy does state that the candidate is a "qualified voter" and "legally qualified to hold such office". The candidate must sign said form and his/her signature must be notarized


How is the citizenry notified of potential candidates for the ballot during the qualification period?

No notification is required. McHenry County posts all filings received in the County Clerk's office on the Clerk's website. Normally newpapers will also report filings as part of their new coverage

a. What process is available for a citizen to contest a candidate's eligibility for office during that period?

Filings are public record and are open for inspection during normal business hours. There is a set time for filing objections to candidate petitions

b. What avenues are available to a citizen questioning a candidate's eligibility after that time period?

After the objection period has passed, and no objections are filed, a candidate is placed on the ballot


In the authority of your office and after the above mentioned contest period, should you question if a candidate is'constitutionally eligible for office, what election law empowers you to investigate your suspicion?

This is a legal question and would need to be researched. My roll in filing petitions is basically ministerial


When an election has occurred, vote tallies completed, is there a process then for which a candidate is verified as constitutionally eligible for the office?

I am not aware this is a requirement. There is no process in place to my knowledge


In the Illinois and Federal election processes that you are familiar with, are there procedural differences such that names submitted for ballots in McHenry County from State and Federal sources, are verified as constitutionally eligible for Office?

You would need to speak or check with other sources as to their procedures. I am not aware of any law requiring verification


One requirement far candidacy is voter registration. Please explain the ways yoters are registered in Illinois. What documents are required to establish age, citizenship and residence?

There are different methods of voter registration: County Clerk's office, deputy registrars, drivers license facilities, agency registrations and mail in registration being the majority. All ask for age, proof is not required. Place of birth is asked for by the Clerk's office and by deputy registrars. Proof is not required. Registrants born outside of the US are asked for additional naturalization information. Voter registration done at drivers license facilities and agencies are asked if they are citizens and sign an oath that they are, and mail in, simply sign an oath attesting to citizenship. On registrations done through the Clerk's office and/or deputy registrars, 2 forms of ID are required, both with the registrants name and 1 with his/her current address. Keep in mind that registration sources, other than the County Clerk's

office and/or deputy registrars and applications to register and if any information is not received or if the voter ID card is returned undeliverable the registration application is not accepted.

10) Are there voter registration processes in use right now, that does not require potential voters to swearto place of birth and that they are US citizens authorized to vote? All require the oath of citizenship. Only Clerk's office and deputy registrars require place of birth

11) As an overview only, and as possible, please describe an instance within the current system where citizens have unknowingly been registered to vote through the State Driver's license registration'process.

We have occasionally had registrations that have been processed and later the registrant has requested removal because they are not citizens. I have never seen one, where someone has voted on these requests for removal

12) In the voter registration process, how is citizenship status verified? What code authorizes the process for verifying citizenship status of a registered voter?

Citizenship is not verified and I am not aware of any requirement and/or authorization to do this'

13) If a voter comes to the poll, and there is a question of his identity or registration status, by what means is the voter's right to vote accommodated during the voting process?

There is a challenged affidavit to fill out and verification and/or proof required

14) Please include any other information you think might assist the Court in understanding the process of verification of eligibility of candidates for ballots in McHenry County and the citizens entitled to vote in McHenry County. Information, especially as relates to vulnerabilities in the system which may allow ineligible participants to engage in the election.

1think all of my answers have stated the requirements and processes as I am aware of them







Sharon Meroni [Sharon@meronigroup.com) Saturday, January 02,20109:16 AM countyclerk-MB 'Mary Alger'; Kathie Schultz FW: Thankyoul

My email server sent notice. that this email was not delivered. Thus, I resend it with hopes it goes through this timel

God Bless,


From: Sharon Merani [mailta:Sharan@meronigroup.cam] Sent: Friday, January 01,20102:01 PM To: 'kcschult@ca.mchenry.il.us' ee: Mary Alger Subject: Thank you!


I want to thank you for the graciousness of your response. I must admit to you, it made me cry, literally, in

appreciation for your work.

Knowledge of the election process, or lack there-of, is a large contributor to barriers in the voting process.

I have experienced that very personally as I have made my way through this process. I have profound respect for the way McHenry County reaches out to the common citizenry, aSSisting us. I saw it in your response to Mary and me, and I see it at the Court level which makes legal resources succinctly available to us, the common folks! Having now had the opportunity to meet you for the first time, I know firsthand that it is a value of yours, such that you lead your office to engage with the citizens so openly. Thank you!!!!!

Three additional questions have come to mind.


During the "5 day Contest Period" for ballot qualification, does McHenry County post notice of candidates for all state and Federal offices.

I do not. I believe that the SBE posts all filings that are done at their office.


SpecifiCally, was Barack Oboma Statement of Candidacy posted for the US Presidential election in 2008? And if so, may I please know where.

I would imagine that posting of his filing was done, but again it would not be done by this office


Are you aWare if any local Newspapers posted the information of Mr, Obama's Statement of

Candidacy during the contest period?

I would think that the papers would have done coverage on this filing, but again it is not something this office would track

Posting of filings would not include any documents, such as the Statement of Candidacy.

Again, Thank you. Also, I offer you warm wishes for a fantastic New Year!

God Bless


One Surrey Lane Barrington Hills, Illinois 60010


1120/20104:16 AM

Citizenship: Citizen, Born Citizen, Natural Born Citizen

By: Mountain Publius Goat © 2008-2009 Mountain Publius Goat AII Rights Reserved. Reprinted Here With Permission Last Update: 06 March 2009

A simple citizenship chart I prepared showing and defining the various types of citizenship mentioned in the U.S. Constitution: The type of citizen you are, i.e., Natural Born Citizen, Born Citizen, or Citizen is determined by your parents and

where you were born.

largest subset or group of a nation's citizens, are usually the Natural Born Citizens. For it is that type of citizen and group, the largest group, which typically defines a country or a nation vs. its geography. The natural born citizens are the citizens of the country who are born of two citizens of the country on the soil of the country and have the strongest natural allegiance to the country and nation. These are the people of the country who will have the strongest allegiance to their country or nation and will be least influenced by foreign forces andlor have the least allegiances to any people and forces outside the country or nation. They will have the least recent familial attachment and influence from foreign citizens. This citizenship status is by nature itself, done by the natural law of the facts itself at the instant of birth of the child, and was not created or given by any law of man.

The subset of all of a nation's citizens which is typically the

The definition of "natural born citizen" being a person born of two citizens ofa country on the soil of a country was first codified in 1758 in the legal reference book, "Law of Nations". Those codified laws were from "natural law" of time eternal since there were countries and nations and thus the source of the term "natural" in the term "natural born citizen". The people who wrote the Constitution back then naturally new what "natural born citizen" meant just like they naturally new what the term "marriage" meant in those days. Only in today's twisting of language, it depends on what the term "is" means, etc., by those with a political agenda do these terms get obfuscated. That legal reference book (Law of Nations) was used by John Jay, a legal scholar, and a key adviser to the framers of the U.S. Constitution.

Sunday, December 6, 2009

What Is Putative President Obama's Current U.S. Citizenship Status?

President Obama's Current U.S. Citizenship Status? have seen that Obama cannot be an Article II "natural

have seen that Obama cannot be an Article II "natural born Citizen" because when he was born, regardless of what place that may be, he was not born to a United States citizen father and mother. The "natural born Citizen" clause of our U.S. Constitution requires that both of the child's parents be U.S. Citizens at the time of birth. Rather, ifObama was born in Hawaii as he claims, then under the liberalized and questionable meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," he can be a born Fourteenth Amendment "citizen of the United States" and a "citizen ofthe United States at birth" under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401 (a). Again, that citizenship status does not make him an Article II "natural born Citizen." But what would Obama's citizenship status be ifhe was not born in the United States? First, let us examine why there is still existing doubts as to whether Obama was born in Hawaii. Second, let us examine what law would apply to determine Obama's citizenship status should he not be born in Hawaii or any other part of the United States and what his citizenship status would be under that law.

These are the reasons for the existing doubts regarding Obama's place of birth:

I. What Obama or some other unknown person posted on the internet is not a birth certificate (BC). Rather, he/she posted a digital image and picture of a questionable "certification of live birth" (COLB) which at best is only prima facie evidence of the place of his birth. The prima facie value of this document fails in light of numerous existing factual circumstances which contradict the COLB's validity and which have not been adequately explained by Obama.

2. According to Obama and his Press Secretary, Mr. Gibbs, this digital document alone is supposed to allow Obama to qualifY to be President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Military. According to them, this electronic image alone is sufficient to prove that Obama is a U.S. citizen and therefore qualified to have the full power of the executive vested in him. It is unbelievable that Obama would expect the American people to grant him such license over their lives based simply upon an electronic image on a computer screen. It is even more unbelievable that the Electoral College, our Congress, political institutions, security forces, and media would allow him to get away with it. This document, which in its paper form is undoubtedly a legal document, has no probative value given that it was posted by some unknown person on the internet as a digital image without following any prescribed electronic media security protocols. We know that digital images can be easily manipulated through computer technology. See http://technology.findlaw.com/articlesfOll02/010555.htmlfor an explanation of the need to follow defined federal and state standards when it comes.t!? electronicfdigital

McRae, who was in the United States, during a telephonic interview on October 12, 2008, while she was in her home located in Alego-Kogello, Kenya, that was full of security police and people and family who were celebrating then-Senator Obama's success story, that she witnessed Obama's birth in Kenya, not the United States (the English and Swahili conversation is recorded and available for listening). She was adamant about this fact not once but twice. The conversation which was placed on speaker phone was translated into English by "Kweli Shuhubia" and one ofthe grandmother's grandsons who were present with the grandmother in the house. After the grandmother made the same statement twice, her grandson intervened, saying "No, No, No, He [sic] was born in the United States." During the interview, the grandmother never changed her reply that she was present when Obama was born in Kenya. The fact that later in the same interview she change her statement to say that Obama was born in Hawaii does not change the fact that she at first stated twice that she was present when Obama was born in Kenya. I cannot imagine a grandmother not knowing whether she was present or not at the birth of her American Senator and U.S. Presidential candidate grandson.

24. The investigator then personally went to the hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. He spoke with the

Provincial Civil Registrar and he learned that there were records of Ann Dunham giving birth to "Barack Hussein Obama, III" in Mombassa, Kenya on August 4, 1961. The investigator then "spoke directly with an Official, the Principal Registrar, who openly confirmed the birthing records of Senator Barack H. Obama, Jr. and his mother were present, however, the file on Barack H. Obama, Jr. was classified and profiled. The Official explained Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. [sic] birth in Kenya is top secret. [H]e was further instructed to go to the Attorney General's Office and to the Minister in Charge of Immigration if [he] wanted further information."

25. The Kenyan Ambassador to the United States, Peter N.R.O. Ogego, confirmed on November

6, 2008, during a radio interview with Detroit radio talk-show hosts Mike Clark, Trudi Daniels, and Marc Fellhauer on WRIF's "Mike In the Morning," that "President-Elect Obama" was born in Kenya and that his birth place was already a "well-known" attraction. The radio interview went as follows:

Clark: "We want to congratulate you on Barack Obama, our new president, and you must be very proud." Ogego: "We are. We are. We are also proud of the U.S. for having made history as well." Fellhauer: "One more quick question, President-elect Obama's birthplace over in Kenya, is that going to be a national spot to go visit, where he was born?" Ogego: "It's already an attraction. His paternal grandmother is still alive." Fellhauer: "His birthplace, they'll put up a marker there?" Ogego: "It would depend on the government. It's already well known." http://my.wrif.com/mimlindex.php?s=Ogego Later on, Ogego's assistant, denying that Obama was born in Kenya, insisted Ogego was speaking about Baraek Obama Sr., and not President-elect Obama.She said she could not say why Ogego responded the way he did. Listening to the radio interview in its entirety, it is very obvious the interviewers were all talking about President-elect Barack Obama and not his father. It is doubtful that Obama's father's paternal grandmother (Obarna's great-grandmother) was still alive. We would also expect that Ogego would have said that Obama was not born in Kenya, but there is an attraction there to honor his father. If it were true that Ogego was refening to

Obama's Sr. and not Obama Jr., we should have heard about and received credible evidence as to what preparatory steps had already been taken in Kenya to honor the birth place of Obama Sr. In evaluating Ogego's statement, we have to also remember that Obama's grandmother also said that Obama Jr. was born in Kenya. Hence, Ogego's assistant's claim that Ogego thought they were talking about Obama's father does not appear credible.

26. It is alleged that the Kenyan government authorities have refused to cooperate and have

thwarted all efforts by anyone to obtain any documents concerning Obama.

27. Obama has refused all effort to have him release the following documents, relying on sealing

of records andlor privacy laws: Punahou High School records, Occidental College records, Columbia College records, Columbia Thesis paper, Harvard College records, Selective Service Registration, medical records, Illinois State Senate records, Illinois State Senate schedule, Law practice client list, Certified Copy of original Birth Certificate, Harvard Law Review articles that were published, University of Chicago scholarly articles, exit and entry immigration records covering aJl of Obama's travels out of the United States; passports; and record of baptism, if any.

28. Fightthesmears.com and factcheck.org have since maintained silence on the birth place issue

after the questionable COLB was posted on the internet.

29. Other thaJ1 a digital composite image representation on the internet of a questionable letter

dated January 24, 2009 that he allegedly wrote to Kapi'olani Medical Center congratulating the hospital on its centennial celebration (it is reported that he refused to confirm that the letter was genuine, http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageld=103503). Obama has remained silent and has not declared publicly after his COLB and place of birth were questioned

that he was born in Hawaii.

30. No member of the media, any political party, the Executive Branch of Government,

Congress, any political institution, the Judiciary, or any law enforcement entity, has publicly

stated that he or she has independently confirmed that Obama was born in Hawaii. Nor has House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, the Chair of the Democratic National Convention, publicly announced that she confirmed that Obama was born in Hawaii.

Given all this evidence, Obama should come forward with competent evidence to conclusively prove that he was born in Hawaii. To date, he has failed to produce such evidence. Hence, under these circumstances, how can the American people in good faith conclude that Obama was born in Hawaii? How did Obama in good conscience twice take the oath to be President on January 20th when so many Americans have put forward all this contradictory evidence regarding where he was born and he refuses to come forward with any other convincing evidence (like a certified copy of his original birth certificate) showing that he was born in Hawaii?

If Obama was not born in the United States, then a completely different legal scenario would apply regarding his current citizenship status. There is much confusion regarding what role Obama's mother plays in giving him United States citizenship. With his father not being a U.S. citizen, Obama would need his mother to make him a citizen only ifhe was not born in the U.S. If he was not born in the United States, his mother would, however, for the following reasons not

be able to transmit United States citizenship to him because she was too young at the time Obama was born.

The law governing the citizenship of children born outside the U.S. to one or more Unites States- citizen parents may be found at 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401 to Sec. 1409. What could apply to Obama are Sec. [401 (Nationals and citizens of United States at birth), 1405 (Persons Born in Hawaii), 1409 (Children born out of wedlock). Sec. 1405 would apply to make him a "citizen of the United States at birth" only if he was born in Hawaii in 1961. With proof of the place of his birth lacking, we cannot now say that this statute would be applicable. Obama has maintained that his parents were married when he was born. They even obtained a divorce. Hence, it does not appear that Sec. 1409 would apply to him. So the only statute which would apply to him to make his a:

"citizen of the United States at birth" would be Section 1401. But Obama., ifnot born in the United States, also cannot satisfy any part of Section 1401.

The only part of Sec. 140 I that could apply to Obama is subsection (g). A child born in wedlock and abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section [401(g) (Section 301(g) INA), provided the citizen parent was physically present in the U.S. for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen is required. For birth between December 24,1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age offourteen are required for physical presence in the U.S. to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child). http://travel.state.gov/law/info/info_609.htrnl. Hence, the Immigration and Nationality Act 1952, 8 U.S.C. 1401(g), Sec. 301 (g) [Effective November [4, [986] does not apply to Obama because he was born in 1961. What does apply to Obama is the Nationality Act of 1940, as Revised June 1952, which was in effect when he was born.'But under this older version of the statute, for birth between December 24,1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen are required for physical presence in the U.S. for the United States citizen parent to transmit United States citizenship to the child. United States of America v. Cervantes-Nava, 281 F.3d 501 (5th Cir. 2002) (citing United States v. Gomez-Orozco, 188 F.3d 422, 426-27 (7th Cir. 1999» and Drozd v. INS, 155 F 3d 81, 85-88 (2d Circuit 1998).

Hence, this is the scenario that would apply if Obama was not born in the United States. Obama's father was not a United States citizen. Obama can therefore only rely on his United States citizen mother to make him a "citizen of the United States at hirth." But as we can see from 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401(g) (the only applicable statute), a mother had to be at least 19 years old when she gave birth to the child born abroad in order to transmit her United States citizenship to him. Obama's mother, born on November 29, 1942, was 18 years old when she gave birth to Obama on August 4, 1961. She was I 17 days short from being 19 years old. But she had to be at least 19 years old (14 years old plus 5 years of U.S. physical presence) to satisfy the legal requirement of Sec. 1401(g) (INA Section 301(g». Therefore, Obama cannot benefit from Sec. 1401 (g).

Hence, if Obama was not born in the United States, under the Fourteenth Amendment he is neither a United States citizen by birth on United States soil nor one by naturalization. (There is no existing evidence that Obama was ever naturalized.) Nor would he qualify to be a United

States citizen by any act of Congress by being born abroad to a United States citizen parent. If this scenario were proven to be true (being neither a born nor a naturalized citizen), it can be reasonably argued that Obama is an undocumented alien. Obama has refused to release his identity documents to the public which causes such theories to exist. It is this reason which shows the importance of the American people being able to access Obama's records (birth certificate, travel, education, and employment records) to intelligently learn his exact citizenship status. Surely, the United States cannot have a possible undocumented alien be its President. People must keep pressing Obama that he releases his personal documents so that they may at least learn that the President is at least a "citizen of the United States" which again still does not make him an Article II "natural born Citizen."

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. 185 Gatzmer Avenue Jamesburg, New Jersey 08831 htlp:/Ipuzo l.blogspot.com/ December 6, 2009 Posted by Puzo 1 at 6:45 PM 47 comments ~~ Labels: access to records, Article II, certification of live birth, constitutional eligibility president, Kerchner, Mario Apuzzo, natural born citizen, Natural Law, Obam'l, The Laws of Nations


The Logic ofa Natural Born Citizen

Open i1 SCIlnralC wiOOow


The Logical analysis of a Natural Born Citizen

and the clear and compelling evidence Ihat Barack Hussein Obama, II is Dol a natural born citizen.

What is a Citizen?

Before defining what a natural born citizen is and how one acquires this status, it is important to understand what a generic citizen is and why a country bestows citizenship upon the members of a society. A citizen is a member of a particular nation who has been given certain rights, privileges, and immunities that are not given to people of other nations. Such rights include voting in elections, receiving a passport, and in some countries can include owning property. A privilege nations extend to citizens is holding elected office and some countries extend immunities to their citizens by preventing them from being extradited to face criminal charges in other countries.

Countries do not extend citizenship solely to grant rights, privileges and immunities to people. Citizenship is granted with the expectation of allegiance given to the country bestowing the benefits of citizenship. Countries demand that this allegiance be observed by its citizens and also impose obligations both civil and military. In times of crisis, nations need to draw upon its


individuals and corporations to insure its treasury is adequately funded to meet its needs. These obligations are duties that its


to establish a loyal force to defend its borders and claims. In all times, nations, use the taxation of its citizens, both

citizens must fulfill and that it cannot impose upon aliens and foreigners.

The most basic definition of a citizen is one who is a member of a particular nation and is entitled to receive rights, privileges and immunities from that particular nation that are not bestowed upon people of other nations in exchange for their allegiance in performing certain obligations not expected of people of other nations w~en called upon to do so.

Merriam Webster dictionary dermes a citizen as "a person owing allegiance to and entitled to the protection of a sovereign


Black's Law dictionary defines a citizen as "a person who owes allegiance to, and may claim reciprocal protection from, a


The Current Methods of Becoming a US Citizen

Throughout the history ofthe United States of America there have been only three major classes ofcitizens: original, naturalized and born. On April 19, 1775, the United States of America entered into armed revolt against the tyrannical rule of the English King. On that date, these freedom fighters ceased being subjects of Great Britain and became Americans. July 4, 1776 was merely the date when the second Continental Congress declared to the world its intentions that had already been manifesled on the battlefields. From April 19, 1775 until September 17, 1787, those that remained or who came to the 13 original states and who were naturalized by the laws of those states during that time were classified as original citizens in the Constitution. This classification of citizenship no longer exists in the present day United States.

A naturalized citizen is a very specific class of citizen whose existence is defined in our Constitution and laws. Naturalization is the process by which aliens declare their intent to be a member of the United States. Setting forth the rules of naturalization is a constitutional function of Congress under Article I. Since 1790, the Congress has enacted naturalization laws, which determine how a foreign national transforms into a national of the United States. A naturalized citizen is equaJ to in stalus as any other class of citizen except those of the natural born citizen class, and only for the expressed purpose of Article 11, Section!.

"111e last method and the most common way to become an American citizen is simply to be born a citizen. The United States has always had two principles that determine if a person is born a citizen of the United States.

I of 12

1/20/20104:07 AM

The Logic ofa Natural Born Citizen


the United States recognizes the U.S. citizenship ofindividuals according to two fundamental principles:jus soli

(right of birthplace) andjus sanguinis (right of blood).

From the office ofCitizenship and Immigration Services

Historically jus sanguinis is the oldest principle used to determine citizenship. It was so prior to the Fourteenth Amendment in the majority of the states when the States themselves were sovereign and created the rules to determine who was a born citizen of that State and by extension of the Nation. Some States extended citizenship to people born within those States Gus

soli), while other States granted citizenship to the children

restrictions upon who could be granted citizenship based upon birth. These restrictions were based upon one's status and race. Some states discriminated against the race of a person, other states discriminated against one's status as a freeman, bondservant or slave regardless of race, and some states restricted citizenship based upon a combination of both statuses.

of citizens of those States Gus sanguinis.) Each State placed

The term jus sant,,'uinis describesa person born of parents who are citizens and jus soli describes a person born in the

country. Pernons who are born only under the principle ofjus sanguinis are called a "consanguineously born citizens," and

their claim of citi7.enship is based on inheritance

principle ofjus soli are called "native born citizens" and these pernons' claims are based on the geographical location of their

birth. Both principles arc equal in making one a born citizen. Being a born citizen extends to them one particular immunity not given to naturalized citizens, in that born citizens are immune from involuntarily renouncing their citizenship. A naturalized citizen can have his citizenship revoked for several reasons, but under current law, born citizens must walk into a US Embassy abroad and in front of the Consul renounce their citizenship.

On the other hand persons who claims their citizenship based solely on the

The only two methods of obtaining US citizenship today arc defined as Naturalizetion and Birth. Of the birth method of obtaining citizenship there are two principles recognized under our law. These are jus sol~ which is based on the place of

birth, and jus sanguinis which is based on the parents. We are now able to refer to the Euler diagram below called "Methods

of Citizenship" in determining the ways to be considered a US citizen today.

the large circle and the space not occupied by either naturalized or born citizens does not indicate that there is any other type of citizen. The large circle is used to collect the two methods of becoming US citizens in one location called US

Citizen so to separate themfrom other citizens such as a citizen of the world or a citizen of Rome.)

(If you are unfamiliar with Euler diagrams.

ACitizen of the United States .Born Citizen as found in the laws, records and Constitution
of the United States
as found in the laws, records and Constitution of
the Unite<! Slates of America


O Ci:izen

oltha us


NaturalIZed 0


Born Citizen

(jus sanguinis}


Born Citizen

(ius soil)

0 Bom cttlzen OUS sanguinis & jus soli)


2 ofl2

Methods of Citizenship

1/20/2010 4:07 AM

The Logic of a Natural Born Citizen


From this diagram, we are able to make nine logical statements concerning general citizenship in the United States.

I. All naturalized citizens are citizens of the United States.

2. All born citizens are citizens of the United States.

3. AII born citizens are not naturalized citizens.

4. All naturalized citizens are not born citizens.

5. All Born citizens under the principle ofjus soli are citizens ofthe United States.

6. All born citizens under the principle ofjus sanguinis are citizens of the United States

7. All born citizens under both the principles of jus soli and jus sanguinis are citizens ofthe United States.

8. Not all born citizens under the principle of jus soli are born citizens under the principle of jus sanguinis. (i.e. children born in the US to alien parents)

9. Not all born citizens under the principle ofjus sanguinis are born citizens under the principle ofjus soli. (i.e. children born to US parents overseas)

The Reason for a "natural born citizen" in Article II, Section 1 of the US Constitution

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen oflhe United States, at Ibe lime oflbe adoption oflbls Constitulion, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible 10 that office who shall not bave attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourleen Years a resident within the United States. Article II, Section I

Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to prOVide a strong check 10 Ihe admission of Foreigners into Ihe administration of our national Government; and 10 dec/are expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army sha/lnot be given to nor devolve on. any but a natural bOrn Citizen. John Jay, July 25,


To understand whom the future Chief Justice John Jay wanted to exclude from being Commander in Chief we need to examine the definition of Foreigner. Using the three most authoritative dictionaries, we can see who should be excluded and

for what reason. We can then start to arrive at a definition of a "natural born citizen," that meets this requirement.

MerriamWebster Dictionary - "a person belonging to or owingalleIDance to a foreign country."

Oxford English Dictionary - "One who is a subject of another country than that in which he resides. A resident foreign in origin and not naturalized, whose allegiance is thus due to a foreign state."

Blacks Law Dictionary - "A person who is not a citizen or subject of the state or country in which mention is made,

or anyone owing allegiance to a foreign state or sovereign"

What all of these definitions have in common with the word citizen is allegiance. The target of the allegiance is different betwcen a foreigner and a citizen. Since the reason for this prohibition of the admission of Foreigners into the office of Commander in Chief, is to prevent the military from being used by non-American powers against the Republic. Jay recommended and the framers agreed that this person must have a natural allegiance that is total and absolute to the Nation and to no any other nation or potentate.

We can look at the citizenship types from the diagram above and make some logical statements of both methods (naturalized and born) of being a citizen in light of allegiance. These statements are made with reliance on generally known and accepted facts.

Naturali7.ed Citizens are not considered for President because of the following observations that could allow the admission of Foreigners into the Administration holding the post of Commander in Chief.


All naturalized citizens were citizens of another country at one point before naturalization.


All naturali7.ed citizens renounce the former allegiances and take an oath of allegiance to the United States, but not all naturalized citizens are honest taking the oath of allegiance.

3. Some countries send their nationals into a targeted country to become citizens for the purpose of facilitating the

3 of 12

1120/2010 4:07 AM

The Logic ofa Natural Born Citizen


affairs of their country of origin. These "citizens" are not acting as registered agents of their fanner countries, but are acting as de facto spies for that country. However, because they took the oath of allegiance they are not considered enemy agents or spies they are considered traitors.

This does not mean that all naturalized citizens are disloyal or have ulterior motives for coming to America. It simply means that allowing naturalized citizens to be President opens the possibility of a Foreigner acting under foreign influence. It is understood by the vast majority of American citizens that naturalized citizens are ineligible to be President of the United

States and further discussion of this method

of becoming a citizen is not necessary.

At this point discussion will be based solely on the method of citizenship called Born Citizen. As stated abeve there are two

legal principles at work in detennining if one is a born citizen.


Refer to the Euler diagram below called "Principles of Barn



diagram below called "Principles of Barn '. Born Citizen 0 Legend Bom Citizen 0 Born Citizen




Bom Citizen 0 Born Citizen


Bom Citizen

(jus S8.I1gtJiJis)

(jus sdi)

. - (ius sanguinis & jus soli)

PkiDclples erBom Otb:emblp

Nat all Born Citizens are considered for President because ofthe following observations that could allow the admission of Foreigners into the Administration holding the post of Commander in Chief.


All born citizens owe allegiance to the United States.


Not all born citizens under jus soli have complete and sale allegiance to the United States from birth, and some may be considered foreigners.

a. Some born citizens, especially those born to alien parents inherit citizlonship via jus sanguinis from their parents'

native countries.


i. It is possible for a bam citizen US citizen to be barn with citizlonship in three distinct countries. These citizenships can come from the country of birth viajus soli, and the country ofthe futher and

the country of the

mother vi. jus sanguinis.

3. Not.1I born citizens under jus sanguinis have complete and sale .ilegiance to the Unhed States from birth, and some may be considered foreigners.


Some born citizens overseas receive citizlonship in the country of birth via jus soli.



born citizens overseas



from a non· US citizen

parent via jus sanguinis.

4. All born citizens under both jus soli and jus sanguinis from both US citizen parents have complete and sale allegiance

to the United States from birth, their allegiance cannot be claimed by another country.

a. No other country can grant citizenship via jus soli.

b. No other country can grant citizenship via jus sanguinis.

i. Naturalized citizen parents have renounced their former citizenships to become naturalized

American citizens and can no longer pass onjus sanguinis citizenship of their former country as an

automatic birthright.

We can now say with certainty that the tenn "a natural born citizen" is a person who is born owing to only one country his or her complete and undivided national allegiance. It is only to this individual that the Constitution of the United States of America entrusts.the office of President and the responsibilities of Commander in Chief to, there is no other. A natural born citizen is a refining subset of that group of citizens called born citizens. Refer to flgllre labeled, "The Unification Principles of

4 of 12

1120/20104:07 AM

The Logic ofa Natural Born Citizen

Natuml Born Citizen."



• Born http://thebirthers.orgimiscllogic.htm • Citizen     Legend   O Bom Citizen






Bom Citizen


Bom cruzen

  O Bom Citizen 0 Bom cruzen




(ju. soil)

Bom cruzen . ()U• "guinis) (ju. soil) At the time of the drafting and ratification of

At the time of the drafting and ratification of the United States constitution, there was one and only one definition that combined both principles ofjus soli and jus sanguinis into a definition of natural born citizen.

"The citizens are Ihe members oflhe civil society; bound 10 Ihis society by cerlain dulies, and subjecllo its aUlhorily, Ihey equally parlicipale in its advanlages. The nalives, or nalural-born cilirens, are Ihose born in the country, o{parent., who are citizens. As the society cannol exisl and perpeluale ilselfolherwise Ihan by Ihe children of Ihe cilizens, Ihose children nalurally follow lhe condition of Iheir falhers, and succeed 10 all Iheir

rights. The sociely is supposed 10 desire this, in consequence of what it owes 10 its. own preservation; and it

pre,mmed, as mailer of course, Ihal each cilizen, on enlering into SOCiety, reserves 10 his children Ihe righl of becoming members of il. The counlry of Ihe falhers is Iherefore Ihat oflhe children; and Ihese become Irue cilizens merely by Iheir lacit consenl. We shall soon see whelher, on Iheir coming 10 Ihe years of discrelion, Ihey may renounce Iheir righi, and whallhey owe 10 lhe society in which Ihey were born. I say, lhal, in order 10 be oflhe counlry, it is necessary Ihal a person be born ofafalher who is a cilizen;for, ifhe is born Ihere of aforeigner, it


will be only Ihe place of his birth, and nol his couhlry." Emmerich Valtel, Law of Nations, § 212. Ofthe citizens and


Valtel's definition of what a natuml born citizen is was first codified into American Common Law in the Supreme Court decision of THE VENUS, 12 U. S. 253 (1814)

"Valle!, who, Ihough not very ful/lo Ihis poinl, is more explicit and more salisfaclory on iI/han any olher whose work hasfallen inlo my hands, says 'The cilizens are Ihe members of the civil society; bound to this society by cerlain dulies, and subjecllo its authority, they equally parlicipale in ils advanlages. The nalives or indigenes are tho.,e born inlhe counlry ofparenls who are cilizens. SOCiety nol being able to subsisl and 10 perpetuale itselfbUI by the children of the citizens, Ihose children naturally follow the condition oflheir falhers, and succeed 10 all

their rights. 'II

'Illis definition was echoed by Congressman John A. Bingham, who is considered the architect oflhe Fourteenth Amendment. Although the congressman said this concerning the Civil Rights Act of 1866, this definition was not replaced by the Fourteenth Amendment.

"I filld 110 faull wilh Ihe inlroduclory clause, which is simply declaralory ofwhal is written in Ihe Conslitulion, Ihat every human being born wilhin Ihe jurisdiclion of Ihe United Siaies ofparents /101 owing allegiance 10 any foreign

sovereignly is. in the language ofyour Constitution itself, a natural born citizen; but, sir, I may be allowed to say

fllrlher, Ihall deny thallhe Congress of Ihe United Slates ever hod Ihe pawer or color ofpower to say lhal any man born wilhin the jurisdiction of Ihe United Siales, and nol owing aforeign allegiance, is not and shall nol be a


cilizen of Ihe United Stales." John

A. Bingham, (R-Ohio) US Congressman, March 9, 1866

1120/2010 4:07 AM

The Logic of n Naruml Born Citizen


This definition has been again codified into American Common Law through the case of MINOR V. HAPPERSETI

The Consiilulion does /101 in words say who shall he natural-horn citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascerlain Ihal. AI common law, wilh Ihe nomenclalure of which Iheframers oflhe Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves. upon their hirlh. citizens also. These were nalives or natural-born citizens, as distinguishedfrom aliens or foreigners. Some alliharilies gofUTther and include as citizens children born within thejurisdiction withoul reference 10 Ihe citizenship oflheir parents. As /0 Ihis class Ihere have been doubls, but never as 10 Ihefirsl. For lhe purposes of Ihis case, il is nol necessary to solve Ihese doubls. II is sufficient far everylhing we have now 10 consider thai all childrell born ofcilizen parellls within Ihejurisdicrion are themselves citizens. The words "all children" are cerlainly as comprehensive, when used in this connection, as "all persons, "and iffemales are included in the last, they musl be illihefirst. That they are included in Ihe lasl is nol denied. Infact. the whole argument of the

plaintiffs proceeds upon Ihat idea. Unanimous opinion of the court. MINOR V. HAPPERSETT, 88 U. S. 162 (1874)

The definition of a natural born citizen written by Vattel and recounted by both Congressman Bingham and the Supreme Court, was whatth. Framers ofthe Constitution wanted when the wrote and ratified Article II, Section I. There can be no other definition Ihat provides the strong check that John Jay urged Washington to incorporate into the Constitution to guard alrdinst those who could have aHegiances to a foreign power from being Commander and Chief of our anned forces. Until we as a nation change the Constitution this is the only standard we can use to call someone an Article II natural born citizen.

Using available material the Framers of Constitution and the architects of Article II, section I had on hand, authoritative statcmenls made by one of the architects of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Supreme Court decisions both before and afler the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, aHows us to create a natural born citizen matrix.

Citizenship Matrix of a natural bom citizen

Contributor to Principle of Birthright Result Citizenship of Father jus sanguinis American Citizenship of Mother
Contributor to
Principle of Birthright
Citizenship of Father
jus sanguinis
Citizenship of Mother
Jus sanguinis
Place of birth
jus soli

The Fourteenth Amendment does not make one born in the United States "a natural born citizen," it only makes them a "born citizen."

AI! persons born or naturalized in Ihe Uniled Slates, and subject to the jurisdiclion thereof, are citizens of the United Slates and oflhe siate wherein Ibey reside. Fourteenth Amendment, Section I, Clause t

The Fourteenth Amendment was ratified to insure that no state could or would deprive the newly freed slaves or their children the rights of citizenship. This can be seen in the remaining text of Section I.

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge Ihe privileges or immunilies ofciti""ns oflhe United Stales; nor shall any State deprive any person oflife, liberty, or property, without due process oflaw; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Fourteenth Amendment, Section t, Clause 2

This Amendment did nol nor does it alter the principle ofjus sanguinis. The principle ofjus sanguinis has been established by the States before the Constitution and codified into national law since 1790. The freed slaves were not US citizens at the lime they were frced and could not have passed US Citizenship to their children. This amendment extended the principle of jus soli unifonnly across the nation, hence the tenn 'born". in the United States' appears in the Fourteenth Amendment.

Ollie plain words of this section cannot be ignored. There is no term "natural born" anywhere to be found. The reason nis not found is because there are the two methods of citi7.enship that are joined by a logical 'or,' which treats both methods as being equal. What they are equal to is the most generic tenn citizen. This is the one concept aU American citizens share,

6 or t2

1/20/20 JO 4 :07 AM

The Logic:ofa Natural Born Citizen



whether we are a naturalized citizen, a born citizen under the principle ofjus soli, a born citizen under the principle ofjus sanguinis, or a natural born citizen under both principles of jus soli and jus sanguinis, we are all citizens of the United States.

The most disputed term in the Fourteenth Amendment is the tenn, 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof.' From the civil rights act we find the words, "ThaI all persons born in the United States and not subject 10 any foreign power, excluding Indians nOltaxed, are hereby declared 10 be citizens of the United States." We can clearly see thai just two years later the phrase, "nol sl/bjecl 10 anyforeign power, excluding Indians not loxed," was replaced with the phrase, 'subjeci to thejurisdiction Ihereof' Clearly this did not change the essence of meaning, as the most complete and reliable definition we have closest to the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment is from Senator Lyman Trumbull, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee who was instrumental in drafting the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Senator Trumbull clearly and succinctly states the meaning of 'subject to the jurisdiction', "What do we mean by 'subjeci 10 the jurisdiclion' of Ihe

United Slales? Not owing allegiance to anyone else. ThaI is what it means

{I cannol he said of any (one) who owes

10 some olher governmenl Ihal he is 'subjecl'lo the jurisdiction of the United States." It is not our intention to

expand this paper into other current topics, the explanation of "subject to the jurisdiction" is only to reinforce the fact that '8t the time of the Fourteenth Amendment the general sentiment was that US citizenship carried with it a complete allegiance


to the United States.

The phrase 'subject to the jurisdiction' has been interpreted differently then what the Amendments architects originally said in the case of Wong Kim Ark. This is a landmark case in citizenship. It is not our intention to take this into the topic of

immigration; however it is necessary to examine this decision as it relates to the specifics of a natural born citizen. There is one statement in the decision of Wong Kim Ark that seems to add unnecessary confusion to the term a "natural born


"The child of an alien, ifborn in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural born child ofa citizen. and by operation ofthe same principle. " Justice Horace Gray W~ng Kim Ark Case, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

There are historical factors that need explanation. But first let's simply look at the logic of what Justice Gray is saying. He is

saying the principle (singular) that both a native born and natural born share is the same. We know that a "natural bom citizen" is a citizen that has two principles to claim citizenship with, jus soli and jus sanguinis. On the other hand, a "native born citizen" has to satisfY only one principle,jus soli to be granted citizenship. It is the principle of jus soli that is the same principle that a "natural born citizen" shares with a "native born citizen" in making them a citizen of the United States, so what Justice Gray stated is correct. This is proven by applying the same statement to a born citizen born overseas by a citizen under the principle of jus sanguinis. If Justice Gray had said, "The child of a citizen, ifborn out Ihe country, is as much a citizen as the natural born child of a citizen, and by operation oflhe same prinCiple" this would hold true, but the singular principlc would not have been jus soli, but rather jus sanguinis. See diagram "Shared principles of born citizens and natural

born citizen."

Born US clti~en of

alien parents

born on US soil

jus soli


•• -


Naturat bom citizen of citi~en parents born on US soil

Jus sanguinis

Ius soli

Bom US citi~en of


bom overseas

jus sanguinis

Sb:u~dpriDdl*' ofbornciamns I.IId ttltunl blmcltb2n

The historical factors that need to be considered at the time of Justice Gray's opinion are, the right to confer the birthright principle ofjus sanguinis was limited to the father. This right was not extended to women until 1934 and was upheld as late us 196 I in the case of Montana v. Kennedy (366 U.S. 308). Therefore, the citizen parent thatJustice Gray is speaking of is the father. The law in effect at that time of his ruling, Revised Statutes of 1878, also gave the mother instant citizenship ifshe werc an alien married to a US citizen, making both parents US citizens. This decision has not altered the integrity or meaning of the definitions of a natural born citizen from Vatlel, Congressman Bingham remarks 0, the Minor v. Happersett decision concerning the necessity of parents plural for conferring upon a native-born citizen the status of natural born citizen. It is also obvious that from the accepted law and definition ofa natural born citizen at the lime of the ruling, Wong Kim Ark would never quatify as natural born citizen and future concerns about Article II, Section 1 were never addressed by the Court as these concerns were not gennane to the issue in front of the court, which was general citizenship under the

Fourteenth Amendment.


1120120104:07 AM

'Ille Logic ofa Natural Born Citizen


We can now update our original Euler diagram to include natural born citizens as a proper subset of Born Citizens.

ACitizen of the United States Born as found in the laws, records and Constitution of
of the United States
as found in the laws, records and Constitution of
the United States of America
records and Constitution of the United States of America Courfosy of theBiMers.,org How does this effect

Courfosy of theBiMers.,org

How does this effect Barack Hussein Obama, IT and his sworn declaration of being a natural born citizeu?

Primarily is the issue of the Certificate of Live Birth that Barack Hussein Obama, 1\ is secreting from the American public is ofmajor concern because it deprives the public of the infonnation needed to determine if he is telling the truth, or lying about his natural born citizen status. Unlike the COLB, which is short hand for Certification of Live Birth, the Certificate of Live Birth has the necessary infonnation to either quickly determine the natural born status of the child or can easily point to further documentation needed to conclude this determination. The key pieces ofinfonnation contained in the Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth are the place of birth ofthe child and the place of birth for both parents. (See photo called Hawaiian Long Form from August S, 1961) If either the father or mother were born overseas, then the next piece of evidence required to validate the "natural born citizen" claim would be proof of American citizenship of the parents ofthe parent born overseas. This can be either in the form ofa naturalization certificate or birth certificates of the parents of the parent born overseas proving they were able to transfer jus sanguinis, birthright citizenship to the parent of the child

requiring confirmation of his or her claim.


1120/2010 4:07 AM

The Logic ofa Natural Born Citizen


Hawaiian Long Form from August 5, 1961

Putting aside the issue of what constitutes a legal Certificate of Live Birth for proving natural born status under Article II, Section I. If we take the information found in Baraek Hussein Obama, l1's "Fight the Smears" website we discover the following








Obama is claiming to be a native citizen of the United Slates of America. This means he is clanninga status of ' a Born Citizen' under the principle of jus soli. It is interesting to note th.t he is not claiminga natural born status, as required by Article II. Le.ve it as it is for now.

On the s.me page, we see from FactCheck.org, Bamck Hussein Ohama, II admitting his f.ther was a British subject at the timo of his birth. Furthermore the cite states that his birth was governed by the British government through the British Nationality Act of 1948.

90f 12

1/20/20104:01 AM

The Logic of a Natural Born Citizen


Fec\CheCl!.org Clarifies Barack's Citizenship




"When 8arack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961,111 Honolulu,

Kenya was a Brttlsh colonY, still part orthe United Kingdom's

d'v¥indling empire, As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a

Brit1sh sUbjec1Whose citizenship status was governed by The Brttlsh NationalilyAct oft 948. That same act govemed the status oFObama Sr.'s children.

Sinee sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. CitiZenShip nor swom an oath of allegiance to Kenya, hiS Kenyan citizenShip automatically expired on AUg. 4.1982."

This Act conferred the title of British subject upon Barack Hussein Obama, II.

Under Section 5 of this Act, citizenship is passed from father to child.

5. (I) Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shaU be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time ofthe birth:

Provided that if the father of such a person is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent only, that person shall not be a citizen ofthe United Kingdom and Colonies by virtue of this section unIess-

(a) that person is born or his father was born in a protectorate, protected state, mandated territory or trust territory

or any place in a foreign country where by treaty, capitulation, grant, usage, sufferance, or other lawful means, His

Majesty then has or had jurisdiction over British subjects; or

Note: Barack Hussien Obama, Sr. was in fact born in Kenya a British Protectorate and crown colony. At one time Hawaii was a British Protectorate, (1794-1843), in which the British Crown had jurisdiction of British Subjects. If you have any doubts please look at the flag of Hawaii. Either of these provisions fulfills the requirements of subsection 5 of the British Nationality Act. Regardless ifhis birthplace was Kenya or Hawaii Barack Hussein Obama, II is a British Subject. His father's birth was in a British Colony or his birth ifin Hawaii which was at one time a British Protectorate.

(b) that person's birth having occurred in a place in a foreign country other than a place such as is mentioned in the last foregoing paragraph, the birth is registered at a United Kingdom consulate within one year of its occurrence,

or, with

the permission of the Secretary of State, later; or

Note: While subparagraph Ca) makes this irrelevant, we have had neither a statement from Ohama, II stating this option was not exercised, nor do we have independent confirmation from an authoritative Source denying this.

Using the infonnation contained on his website, we can accurately produce a natural born citizen matrix for him to see if he is in fact an Article II, natural born citizen.



.; 1":

l ogic

ofa Natural Born Citizen



Citizenship Matrix of Saraek Hussein OQa~, \I<i\~


Conltibu,tor to,

Pti neiple of;Birttif;ghi'




--:. ~~~uJi'.~I}:j







Citizenship Hf'~l\tfu!'1:$

""jus sa~~~j9i,~®-.\l.:J

,6:rilish Subjeet;>EI:

\H.> -

:"\ \\



Citizenship of M.9-mrM


American Citizen


Place of 6lrft{~I.l ~

jus soli'


United States



Using both the law and logic it can now clearly be seen that Barack Hussein Obama, II is not a natural born citizen as


to hold the office of President of the United states of America and be the Commander in Chief ofits armies as


under Article II,

Section I of the Constitution ofthe United States of America.

He does not meet the full and complete description of a "natural born citizen," which is a citizen who has unity of citizenship at birth to one and only one countl)' via by both Jus soli (place) and Jus sanguinis (the parents,) who is born in the country to two citizens of the countl)'. Such a citizen can only have his allegiance claimed by one countl)'. A natural born citizen cannot evade civic or milital)' obligations by repatriating himself or herself to another country since a natural born citizen does not have dual or multiple citizenships by birth. A natural born citizen who gives his or her allegiance to another country during a time of war cannot justify it by saying he or she is a spy or a patriot for some other country for which he or she also has citizenship via birth. Such a person is simply a traitor to his or her natural born country.

Obama's refusal to release his long fomn Certificate of Live Birth from Hawaii, his manipulation of facts, his own statements can only lead a reasonable person to believe that he intentionally has lead the United States of America into a Constitutional


However, this can now be resolved by the state court of the State of Arizona, ifthere is one sheriff, one prosecutor, one judge, one state representative loyal to the Constitution, because on December 13,2007 at 3:01 PM Mountain Time, Barrack Hussein Obama, il fraudulently filed a sworn affidavit in h~ own hand that declared himself to be a natural born citizen of the Uniled Slates of America, and that he has fulfilled the requirements under the Constitution. The landmark case ofelinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997) has set the precedent that a sitting President is not immune from prosecution for acts committed before taking office.











::=:::-=-:!:::-:::-~::-= -=::.-::-=-::;-:;:-







-=::.-::-=-::;-:;:- -- -" - - -- - _ ",.tioorioo. ~ <==00 • II -_ n--. coJ~r-


",.tioorioo. ~




n--. coJ~r-






<>- •


• II -_ n--. coJ~r- D_ 0 ",. , , <>- • f .-.--- -". ---






--_ :=,.--.-----







--- - -- --_ :=,.--.----- _-.- =-.--.~ _-2!! - , ~.!7 The question now is can

The question now is can America find one honest public servant in Arizona who believes in the supremacy ofthe US Constitution. If we can find officers of the court loyal to the Constitution then Chris Matthews will really get a tingte up his

II of 12

1120120104:07 AM

:If<: !.ogic of a Natural Born Citizen


leg when he sees Obama in the pink underwear issued to him by Sheriff Joe Arpaio


Barack Hussein Obama II is NOT an Article II Natural Born Citizen ofthe USA!


1/20/20 to 4:07 AM

Hawai'i State Department of Health


http://hawaiLgovlhealthlyital-recordslobama,hunl • • I Hom& Pboul DOH :. Health TopiCS Hawall Maul
http://hawaiLgovlhealthlyital-recordslobama,hunl • • I Hom& Pboul DOH :. Health TopiCS Hawall Maul

I Hom&

Pboul DOH


Health TopiCS









---'! [S



Balow are responses to frequently asked questions related to all records and documents maintained by the Hawaii State Department of Health (DOH) relalBd to the vital records of President Barock Hussein Obama II, Frequently requestad recorda and documents which can be released to the public are attached by electronic link below or. for those records

and documents that are not available electronically. directions ara provided for requesting copies.

The State's public records law, the Uniform Information Practices Act (Modified) rUIPA"), found at chapter 92F, Hawaii Revised Statutes ("HRS") requires that all government racords be open to public inspection unless access is restrictad or dosed by law. Govemment records means information maintained by an agency in written, auditory, visual, electronic, or other physical (ann, see HRS §92F-3. The UIPA does nol require an agency to provide acoass to government records that state law protects from


a, HRS §92F-13 (4), nor does ij require agencies to respond to all questions asked of the agency.

Unless a request for DOH records is specific enough to be understood, the request cannot be rasponded to by the DOH.

The DOH may not have a record which is responsive to a requesl The UJPA does nol require an agency to compile or create

information to respond to a request.

State law prohibits the DOH from disclosing any vital statistics records or information contained in such records unless the requestor has a direct and tangible interest in the record. or as otherwise allowed by statute or administrative rule. See HRS §338-18. Direct and tangible interest is determined by HRS §338-18(b).

In light of the unprecedented number of requests for information relating to the vital records of President Sarack Hussein Obama II, the DOH has raviewed the requirements of UIPA and the confidentiality provisions of HRS Chapter 338.

Based upon that review, tha DOH has determined that the information listed below constitutes all of the publicly available information related to requests for vital statistics records pertaining to President Barack Hussein Obama III and the only disclosures pertaining to those records that can be made in accordance with Hawaii law. The Department of Health is providing links to copies of the records in the form that they are available to the public.


Birth CertlficalB or certificate of Llva Birth

State law prohibits the DOH for disclosing any infonnation about a Hawaii vital record unless the requestor has a direct and tangible interest in the record. This includes verification of vital records and all the information contained in a reoord. Vital records disclosure laws protect all birth, death, marriage and divorce records held by the department and all amendments, changes, supporting records, and requests related to vital records.

Direct and tangible interest is determined by HRS §338-18(b), This statute may be acoassed on the state legislative website at:


The law that governs vital records in the State of Hawaii is Hawaii Revised Statutes chapter 338, which may be accessed on the state legislature website at:


Information on how to order certified copies of vital records in Hawaii and who is eligible to order vital records in Hawaii, is available on the DOH website at:



Index Data

Haw. Rev. Slat. §338-18(d) states, "Index data consisting of name and sex of the registrant, type of vilal event, and such other data as the director may authorize shall be made available to the public: Refer to link above for HRS


Index data consisting of name and sex of the registrant. and type of event is made available to the public. The diractor, in accordance with HRS §331>-18(d), has not authorized any other dala to be made available to the public.

Index data referred to in HRS §338~18 from vital records in the State of Hawaii is available for inspection at the Department of Health's Office of Health Status Monitoring at 1250 Punchbowl Street in Honolulu. The public may

sign in Bnd inspect the names and sex of all births that occurred in the state. type of avent with names listed alphabetically by last name.

Data is maintained in bound copies by

The index data regarding President Obama is:

Birth Index Obama II, Barack Hussein Male

To request index data. prOvide a first and last name of the individual, and the type of event. There is no cost for the

t of2

1114/2010 10:24 PM

l'lawai'i State Department oruealtll


filSt two requests; all subsequent requests require a prepayment of $7.50 per individual and

with a self-addressed, stamped en

and checks payable to the State Department of Health) will be accepted. PelSonal ch.cks will not be accepted. All

fees are non-refundable: if no data is found after a search is conducted, the fees are retained to cover the cost of the search. Requests for index data will be sent out within 2-3 weeks after receipt of payment.

Prepayment and a wr~ten request including a first and last name and type of e

stamped envelope may be mailed to:

nt requested along


Only a money order, certified check, or cashiers check (make money order


along with a self-addressed,

Stat. Department of Health Office of Health Status Monitoring

IssuanceJVital Statistics Section

P,O. Box 3378 Honolulu, HI 96801


All past statements by the Health Director are available at:

All past statements by the Health Director are available at: The statements speak for themselves and
All past statements by the Health Director are available at: The statements speak for themselves and

The statements speak for themselves and there are no other public records maintained by the department related to these statements that are available to the public.

4. Allrucords on department regulations and rules related to vital records are at:


These records CQnsist of:

Public Health Regulations Chapter 8 (Vital Records Regulations and Records) Public Health Regulations Chapter BA (Delayed Birth Registration) Public Health Regulations Chapter 8B (Vital Statistics Regulations and Records) Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11 Department of Health Chapter 120 (Foreign Bom Persons Adopted in Hawaii) Hawaii Administrative Rules, TItle 11 D.partment of Health Chapter 123 (Names of Natural Parents in Birth Certificate of Adopted PelSon)


If you would Iil<e to ha

$10.00 along with your written request to;

a hard copy of tile rules sent to you by mail or by facsimile, please send a prepayment of

State Department of Health Office of Health Status Monitoring

IssuanceN'llal Statistics Section

P.O. Box 3378 Honolulu, HI 96801

OiSlClamer end TetmI.EL~ Hawal 51ata DepaItnent or Heath· 1250 F1n::hI:oM 5lreet . tb'lokaJ, HI 96813

ilI4/2010 10;24 PM



Christopher Ruddy


Barack Obama's Birth Certificate: Why It Matters

Wednesday, August 5, 2009 3:54 PM

lIy: Chrisl()pher Ruddy

Where was Sarack Obama born?

It's a fair question.

Article Font Size c.J L+ 1

But we still don't know the answer because Obama won't tell us, because he remains the most mysterious man ever to sit in the Oval Office.

This week I appeared on Bill O'Reilly's No. I rated "The O'Reilly Factor" to discuss the controversy over Obama's birth certificate, along with syndicated radio host Mike Gallagher. [See the video of my appearance - Click Here Now.]

Let me make clear that I believe Obama was born somewhere in the state of Hawaii. Days after his birth, a small legal notice was printed in the local newspaper announcing his birth.

And the head of Hawaii's Health Department has stated that he reviewed pertinent documents and that Obama was indeed born in that state.

So, those who believe Obama was born outside the United States, such as in Kenya, are simply out to lunch.

But the real story here is about Obama's failure to release his birth certificate.

As the state.ofHawaii has made clear, the actual birth certificate has never been released.

Obama has released another document, the certification oflive birth. This document does not provide basic information, such as the place ofObama's birth or the doctor who conducted the


My brother Dan, a presidential historian who has a book coming out next year on Theodore Roosevelt, pointed out to me how rare Obama is among presidents.

He says we have no idea of his birthplace.

Dan notes that, of our unbroken line of 43

Taylor and Andrew Jackson, both born on the frontier, have disputed birth sites. All others

have some commemoration for their place of birth - except Obama.

men who have served as president, only Zachary

In Manhattan, you can stroll down to 28 E. 20th St., between Park Avenue South and Broadway, and visit the quaint brownstone that Theodore Roosevelt was born and raised in.

For Obama there is no plaque, nothing. (His family has given two different hospitals in Hawaii he was alleged to have been born in.)

We should know where our president was born. There is nothing conspiratorial in having an answer to that question.

President Obama is no longer a private citizen. He is part of a chain of history that stretches back to George Washington.

His birth site is just as relevant as those of the 42 men who came before him, and ifthese sites are not relevant, than why do we as a nation go out of our way to commemorate all of them?

When I asked Bill O'Reilly where in Honolulu Obama was born, he replied: "Chris, if! "

wanted to know

I'd find out tomorrow

Good luck, Bill. The Obama White House is the most secretive ever.

Since Obama announced his candidacy, much of his life has been shrouded in secrecy.

He still has never released his college transcripts, his records as a state legislator in lIIinois, his full medical records, even the names of donors who reportedly contributed hundreds of . millions of dollars that helped make him president.

[n the past, the disclosure of such documents has been de rigueur for presidential candidates.

When Sen. John McCain was questioned about his birth outside the United States in the Panama Canal Zone, he released his birth certificate quickly.

Whcn McCain was questioned about his health, he released 1,500 pages of medical records.

When questions arose about donations to his campaign, McCain put his full donor file, even



names he didn't have to disclose, online for anyone to see.

So, let me be clear.

The issue over Obama's birth certificate is not about President Obama's citizenship.

It is about his honesty and his promise to be the most transparent president ever.

Releasing his birth certificate and other personal records that presidents have traditionally released to the public would go a long way toward bolstering those claims.

P.S. I am listing below all of our presidents and details of their places of birth.

I. George Washington - Address: George Washington Birthplace National Monument; Rural Route I; Box 717; Washington's Birthplace, Va. 22443

2. John Adams -

Address: 133 Franklin S1.; Quincy, Mass. 02669

3.Thomas Jefferson -Address: U.S. 250; 3 miles east of Charlottesville, Va.

4. James Madison -

Colonial Beach, Va. 22443

Address: Monroe Hall; Virginia SR 205; Westmoreland County near

5.James Monroe - Address: Monroe Hall; Virginia SR 205; Westmoreland County near Colonial Beach, Va. 22443

6.John Quincy Adams -

Address: 141 Franklin S1.; Quincy, Mass. 02169

7.Andrew Jackson

The Par~ is on Route 1. Address: 196 Andrew Jackson Park Road; Lancaster, S.C. 29720

Address: 14 miles south of Rock Hill on South Carolina State Route 5.

8.Martin Van Buren -Address: 46 Hudson S1.; Kinderhook, New York 12106

9.WilIiam Henry Harrison-Address: 12602 Harrison Landing Road; Charles City, Va.


10.•John Tyler-Address: John Tyler Memorial Highway; Charles City, Va. 23030

11 .•Iames Polk -

Address: Box 475; Pineville, N.C. 28\34

12. Zachary Taylor-Address: Highway 33; 5 miles west of Gordonsville, Va., and just

over 20 miles from Charlottesville, Va.

14. Franklin Pierce -


Address: The Pierce Homestead; Routes 9 and 31; Hillsboro, N.H.

15 .•James Buchanan

16. Abraham Lincoln

Hodgenville, Ky. 42748

17. Andrew Johnson


Address: Buchanan Historic Site; Mercersburg, Pa 17236

Address: Sinking Spring Farm; 2995 Lincoln Farm Road;

Address: Mordecai Historic Park; Wake Forest Road; Raleigh, N.C.

18. Ulysses Grant


Address: Grant's Birthplace; Routes 52E and 322; Point Pleasant, Ohio

19. Rutherford Hayes -

Delaware, Ohio 43015

Address: Rutherford B. Hayes Birthplace; East William Street;

20. James Garfield

Moreland Hills (now Chagrin Falls); Cuyahoga County, Ohio 44022

Address: James A. Garfield Birthplace; 4350 S.O.M Center Road;

21. Chester Arthur -

VI. 05455

Address: Chester A. Arthur State Historic Site; Route 36; Fairfield,

22. Grover Cleveland -

Bloomfield Avenue; Caldwell, N.J. 07006

Address: Grover Cleveland Birthplace State Historic Site; 207

23. Benjamin Harrison -

Home; Symmes and Washington Avenues; North Bend, Ohio 45052

Address: Benjamin Harrison Birthplace; William Henry Harrison

24. Grover Cleveland

Bloomfield Avenue; Caldwell, N.J. 07006

Address: Grover Cleveland Birthplace State Historic Site; 207

25. William McKinley -

Ohio 44446

Address: William McKinley Birthplace; 36 S. Main SI.; Niles,

26. Theodore Roosevelt -

28 East 20thSt.; New York, N.Y. 10003

Address: Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace National Historic Site;

27. William Taft

Address: 2038 Auburn Ave., Cincinnati, Ohio 45219

28. Woodrow Wilson

Address: 18-24 CoaIter Street, Staunton, Va. 24401

29. Warren Harding

Address: Highways 97 and 288, Blooming Grove, Ohio 44878

30. Calvin Coolidge -

31. Herbert Hoover -

Address: P.O. Box 247, Plymouth, Vennont 05056

Address: West Branch, Iowa 52538

32. Franklin Roosevelt-Address: 519 Albany Post Road, Hyde Park, N.Y. 12538

33. Harry Truman -Address: 1009 Truman Ave., Lamar, Mo. 64759

34. Dwight Eisenhower -

Address: 208 East Day St., Denison, Texas 75020

35.•Iohn Kennedy -

36. Lyndon Johnson -

Address: 83 Beals St., Brookline, Mass. 02146

Address: Box 329 Johnson City, Texas 78636

37. Richard Nixon -

Address: 18001 Yorba Linda Blvd., Yorba Linda, Calif. 92686

38. Gerald Ford -

Address: 3202 Woolworth Ave, Omaha, Neb. 68103

39. James Carter -

Address: 300 North Bond St., Plains, Ga. 31780

40. Ronald Reagan -

Address: 119 S. Main St., Tampico, Ill. 61283

41. George H.W. Bush -

Address: 173 Adams St, Milton, Mass. 02187

42. Bill Clinton -

The hospital has been demolished.

Address: Bill Clinton was born at the Julia Chester Hospital in Hope, Ark.

43. George W. Bush -

was then Grace-New Haven Community Hospital and is now Yale-New Haven Hospital.

Address: George W. was born to Barbara and George Bush in what

44. Barack Obama -

Address: Unknown.

© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved

Hawaii refuses to verilY presidenfs online COLBs

http://www.wnd.comiindex.php?fu=PAGE.view&pageld= I05817



~ .~1I.


How to Make Solar Panels at HOllie in I Day

Build Solar Panel or Wmd Generator for Home and Save 9m on POW" Bill

or Wmd Generator for Home and Save 9m on POW" Bill When You Need It Most

When You

Need It Most

Frr;e Inl'ormrton ~Y(;e ~ unlquagifu -Ii" for 4!Kem1flll minch WNO'X'SUPERSTORE 'REE Alert.
Frr;e Inl'ormrton ~Y(;e
for 4!Kem1flll minch


Hawaii refuses to verify president's online


Officials mum on images released by Obama's campaign, FactCheck.org

Pooled: A~ 02, 2009

7:18 pIU Easlern

WND Directory

By Jerome R. Corsi

C 2010 WorldNctDaily

WND Su~rslOro

Pug!; J News Ilnge 2 News

In response to a direct question from WND, the Hawaii Department ofHealtb refused to


nuthenliClllC eithcroftltc two versions ofPrc:sident Obamn's shortwform Certificale afLive Birth,


or COLB, posted online - neither the image produced by the Obamn campaign nor the images


released by FactChcck.org.

WNI) TV/Rndio

WhisllebIO\ 'Cr

Janice Okubo,lhc public infonnation offICer for the Hawaii DOH, also had no expianalion for

G2 Bulletin

why Dr. Chiyome Fukino's initial press release last October and subsequent press release last

Red Alert


WNO I~orums


Leners to the Editor

Joke urlhe Day


'IV Guide



Tho 'mm Wgn't


DISCOVer What Self

Defense Masters"

The Anny Don't Went You To Know

w CbKCcomblltTral

The Anny Don't Went You To Know w CbKCcomblltTral WND Resources AooutWND WNDSooop1!. Who Rends Us

WND Resources



Who Rends Us

Other New_" Scrvices
Other New_" Scrvices

Other Silos

Writers Archives

Government Officials

Search Engines




ConIne! WNI)

Who's Who 01 WND

wee:k DisC) avoided

declaring the posted images to be of authentic documents.

In June 2008, Ben LaBolt, an Obarm campaign spokesman, released the initial shon~formObama COLD 10 various newspapers, including the Los Angeles Times declaring, "This is Sen. Obama's birth cenilieatc."

ThisshOrl~formOooma COLB was released as a .jpglntemet image, displaying no signs of having

heen folded or of c8nying an offiewl Stale of Hawaii embossed seal.

- .-






.1 . CIn'.~o-\Oc:.'
'usuo """'"
ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATe THIS CERTIFICATE Today'sWND Ne 0_'5 eli!!lbility becomes war armng



0_'5 eli!!lbility

becomes war armng the states

The Scott heard 'round the

world: Drov.n wins Senate


Psalms banned, but withcraft OK

Bush speech

HanDity. Corsi





Little Christian scbool out-debates them all again

Today', Gyn


Where Qun owners

can p~ thefr nohts and stay




Today'sWND Commentor)' Highlights Tea party returns to its Mass:. roots


By Joseph Farah

iSllIcl and their G

- By Molotov Mitchell Who needs energy independence? - By John Stossel

HaRi'S avoidable death 1011 8 By Walter E. Williams ABC link deniers caught with their pants on the grvund - By JaJ Stanek Oem damage control in Massachusetts

8 By Ball)' Farber




1/20/20104:45 AM

Hawaii rcfuses to verilY president's online COLBs

http://www.wnd.comiindex.php?fa~PAGE, view&pageld~105817

Cus.tomer Scn'icc ~pcnkeN;tlml Tlllk Show



As demonstrated by a poster on Free Republic identifted as ~musicmun." the COLB the Obama

campaign released in June 2008 apparently had a dale stamped on the back that bled through to

the document's front side.

l- Sf"'T£OJ=~WAII """,""" ,I n .J ~- " ~ """'" ,., :1
"""'" ,.,
QI'I'.I_"~ w!OlClf"'"


- '-











!~ i!" :: r:)

~,?.;r ~j,:,1





~ I ~-


.,--- """"" """














OEPARTIotfNT OF IE.Al.TH KAWAlfUI" - ~ ~~ ~~


~~ ~~


KAWAlfUI" - ~ ~~ ~~ CERTlrJCATEHO••••• ~ DthollM4'blNcllltlll-oh ~ ~ When magnified and





When magnified and reversed, the date·JUN 8 2007" appears to be leglble.


the date·JUN 8 2007" appears to be leglble. .,' When this short-form COLB was relcascd,lhc Obama

When this short-form COLB was relcascd,lhc Obama campaign did not explain who obtained the

document from tlte Ha"'Uii DOH or "'by the document had been held for a year before being released to the public.

Anomalies in this version of the Obal1lll COLB, however. rai

queS1ionsamong skeptics:





• The printinB. on the document clearly appeared done by a laser printer not by any priming dcviceavallablc in 1961.

• The father's -roce" was listed as" African," not -Negro," the more expected designation in the less politically corrcct environment of the early J9605.

• As noted above, Ihe document evidenced no embossed seal from the State ofHav


• The lack offolds on Ihe document raised questions ifand how the document had been mailed by the }lIw.aii OOH to the requestingrecipienl.

Two months lalcr, however, on AUg. 21.2008, Fo.cICheck.org. an organimlion funded by the same left-leaning Annenberg Foundation that also employed Bamck Obama and former Weathcnnan rndieal bomber Bill Ayers, produced a short-form Obama COLB that was very

Hawaii refuses to verifY president's online COLBs

different in appearance,

(Story continues below)

Cr.dll C.rd Bailout 3.75" APR· PnJgram • Siah Rwflnam:. NDW 50%1 N!MI PRVBIll CIAS Debt
Cr.dll C.rd Bailout 3.75" APR· PnJgram • Siah Rwflnam:. NDW 50%1 N!MI PRVBIll CIAS Debt

Cr.dll C.rd Bailout

3.75" APR·

PnJgram • Siah

Rwflnam:. NDW



$BOt.bnIht kf FlIIIIInd

on Cf'H.bJMy




http://www.wnd.comiindex.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageld= 105817





r: .'. • COME OUT ANn PlAY.

Responding to questions raised on the Internet about the Duthenticity oflhe short·form COLB

released by the Obamn campaign in June 2008, FactCheck.org produced photographs ofa shon-fann COLB that clearly looked folded and displayed what appeared to be an embossed seal from the state of Hawaii.

In suppon ofitsnrgumcnt that the COLS released in August was identical to the one produced by the Obama campaign in June and was an authentic Stale of I-Ia\\'aii document, FactCheck.org offered the following image:

document, FactCheck.org offered the following image: This faclCheck.org document was distinguished by a long

This faclCheck.org document was distinguished by a long blank header that did not appear on the COLD released by the Qroma camP'lign.

This document further came with a stamp on the back, dated June 6, 2001, which suggests the FaelCheck.org document could be the source of the image released earlier by the Ohama campaign.

of the image released earlier by the Ohama campaign. The image orthe COtB released by the

The image orthe COtB released by the Dbafllll campllign displayed no (Jfficial seal, though l~actCheck.OTgdisplayed the seal in a side view laken from what appears (0 be the document's front. 111e website did nol, however. present a similo.rly enlarged photo oflhe back 10 verify whether the pressing had left the identical image on both sides orlhe paper.


1/20/2010 4:45 AM

Hawaii refuses to verify presidenfs online COLBs


Morco~·cr. FaclCheck.orgoffcred no c"'-planation as to why \'arious

displayed in the Aug. 21, 2008, article varted dramatically from the originally released Obamn

campaign COLB.

images afthe COLS

In the above folded version, the cenincate number is not redacted, and the -'96'" suggests the document ""as not gencraled by a \961 computer, which genemUy did not mill! dates in four digit formats, as evidenced by the long~ronn originaJ birth certificates WND obtained from the Nordyke twins who were bom in Honolulu the day after P~sidentObama's reported birthdate.

In the Nordyke originallong-fonn birtb certificate, Ihe year is listed'simply as "61," not "'961," as is clear in the image below:

Botnthe Obama campaign, when refeasing the short·fonn COLS in June 2008, and

Hawaii rcrUs~~'tOverify president's online eOLBs


FactCheck,org. when analyzing their \'ersion of the short-fonn COLS in August 2008. referred 10

the document as 8 "birth certificate" y

Dflong-fonn original birth certificate the Nordyke twins received.


distinguishing that neither COLS resembles the type

The ·Certification of Uve Binh" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth cel1ificate"

docs not in nRy way prove he was hom m HDwai~ since the same "short.fonn- document is easily

obtainable fer children not bom in Hawaii. The true "Iong-fonn" birth certilicate - which includes information such as lhc name (lfthe birth hospital and attending physician -is the onl{ document

thnl can prove Obarrw. was born in Hawaii, but to dale he has not permiued its release for public or press scrutiny.

WND has produced hundreds of stories fCP.Qrting on d07.ens oflegl!1 challenges to Ohama's status 8S n "natural born citizen" and other issues, The Constitution, Article 2, Section I, states, -No Person except a natural bom Citizen, ora Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption

of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Offtce ofPreskient."

Some of the challenges question whether he was actually born in IbWlli~ as he insists, Ifhe VI-'3S bom out orlhe country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend. "'as too young allhe time of his birlh to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the lime,

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizcnship through his father, 8 Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction oftlle United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him II dual citizen. The cuses contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural


Compticoting the situation is Obama's decision to spend sums estimated in the hundreds of

thousands of dollars to 8,,'oid releasing 8 slate birth certiftcate and other documentation.

Obama's hirth certificate is nollhe only document at issue, WND has reported that among the documentation not yel a\'ailable for Obama includes his kindergarten reeords. his Punahou school

records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his

Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Revicw articles, his scholarly articles from the

University ofChtcagD, his passporl, his medical records, his files from his years 8S an Illinois state

senator, his Illinois SU'tte Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records,

NOle: Members of lhe news media wishing to inIerv;ell' Drew Zohn,

Farah, JOr! Kovacs, Chelsea SchlJling. Les Klnsolving or 80b Unruh on this i~, please cantacl

Jerome Corsi, Joseph


R~lat~d otrers:

See the movie Obnma does not "",nnt YOU to sec' Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presiden'inl eligibility mystery!

Join Ihe lli:lition carnlHligr) to make President Obama reveal his

W!lgiQ!!l.t, hospjlJlJ:gcnel"dte,p birth e,cniflCa~l

Want to !Urn up Ihe pressure 10 learn the facts? Get your siMS and ~stcardsasking for the president's birth certificate documentation from the Birth Certifiente Store!

Send a contribution to supoort the national billboard campaign that asks the simple question. "Wherc's the birth ceniflCate?R

simple question. "Wherc's the birth ceniflCate?R <Jet your )'nrd signs and mlly signs thnl ask

<Jet your )'nrd signs and mlly signs thnl ask the same gue!ilion - and mnke sure it's in time for the next tea party mlly

Get your oennanent detachable magJ\etic bumper stickers for your car, truck or file cabinet join the eamp:1ign foreon~lilutionalintegrity,

(Jet the most eompreben~ive snecial report c\'er prqduced on the Obama eligibility issuc.


Prt:,,'ious stories:

, Is this really smoking gun ofObama's Kenyan binh?

New poll shows 'binhcrs' growing

<Juess how many \\'D.ys 10 get Hawaii 'birth certificate'

Vanished: Ohama exposer disappears offNet

Obailln played hardball in first Chicago campe- CNN.com




l i t i c s . c O l T .'--1 -------------;1_ VIDEO IIIEPORT IMPACT




c O l T .'--1 -------------;1_ VIDEO IIIEPORT IMPACT IntllrNtloM1 f<lillon updated 2;21 p.m. EDT, Frl

IntllrNtloM1 f<lillon

VIDEO IIIEPORT IMPACT IntllrNtloM1 f<lillon updated 2;21 p.m. EDT, Frl Moly 30, 2005 Obama played

updated 2;21 p.m. EDT, Frl Moly 30, 2005

Obama played hardball in first Chicago campaign

STORY HIGHUGHTS Sen. Sarack Obama used the rula book to win first race for Illinois slate Senate Oemocrat chaU8I'lgO(I opponenls' petitions and forced lhEIm off the bela!. Opponent says Obama's move "wasn't honorable"

says Obama's move "wasn't honorable" 9 ~DEO eyOreM' G!J'!IrIand KalhlaanJohItl(1lIl



eyOreM' G!J'!IrIand KalhlaanJohItl(1lIl

CN'lS 11; 36(1'

'c<, nre 00

(CNNI- \".hen the Democratic Na1ional CQrrm~lee meDlS Saturdny on the thomy issu& of soaling the Florida end MlChigandeJegations at'llS fougust convention, pany offlCiats wll have to lastUon a solution that satisfies

suppoctOC'$ of Sen. H~1afy Clinton and

pr&SiOOntial nomnee front~mer Sen. Barack Obcma.

and pr&SiOOntial nomnee front~mer Sen. Barack Obcma. SOlI. 8Mldo O~ lhowed he w.s w*", to 11511

SOlI. 8Mldo O~ lhowed he w.s w*", to 11511

I may lake a SolOmon·.ke decision to appease

both candidates.

Clinton has argued thalihe primal')' results of two of

the Ilation', talgasl slates should count because,

otherwise, miDions of volors are being

disenfranchised. Obama has said ho 15 wiUing 10

work Olt some ccrnpromise.

Bul he Is insistont thai the primary r$$Ult$ are

inva~d because the two states failed to folto.¥ patty rules and thai tl'1e rules are the rules.

The DNC has nol seat!)d!he Florida and Michigan delegates because the two states violated party edicts in Mlding their primaries earty.

bonI·lIIut1<.!ellCtC.S<lumgl"il ImrlC:llnC~

Although neither candidate campaigned in the two states, Clinlon won aboul50 ~nl of lila Florida vete, compared with 3J percent for Obilma. She wan 05 poteen! oflhe vote in MiChigan, where Obama's name was not on tile ballot.

h his lirsr. race for offtee, seeking II state Stoat. Malon Chicago's gmty Soutn Side in 1996, Obama effoclively uS(Kf election rules to eliminate his Oemxratic competition.

h. D: O;>rmu"Iity orglrlilJlf, he had help&d regiSlor lhousards of voters. BlfI when it carne timt \0 run fO( offICe, ho omployad Chicago rules to invalidate the vot~ pelltion siglalLl"os of three of his cnaUengers.


Obilma's past battles

on AC3S0. Tonight, '0 p.mET S41.'ull.m.d~lI.
on AC3S0.
Tonight, '0 p.mET

The! move denied oach of them. inc:tuding incumbem Nice Palmer, a

longtime Chit:ago activist.

Obama to M


'ThaI was Chicago politics," saId John Kass, a VOIOl'M Chicago Tribune colt.rnnisl. "KnOCk out your opposrtion, challenge their petilions, destroy your oll8!Tl)', right? It is how B.-ack Obama destroyed hi, enemies back in 1996lh81 eonf~er.swith his messageloday. He may have gotten his SIart ragisllring thousands of voters. But in that first race, he made slSe \'titers had just one choice."

unopposed on the Damoc:rmic ticket in a heavily Oemocra1

a place on \he ballot. It cleared the way for

@ WltI~1lbowOtlllrm 1Ihu1 0IrI chllt.nllin In hit linn rICe

Obama', chal\en~w8$ perfectly regal, $lid Jay Slewirt of the Chicago's Belief GoYemment Association. Allnough records of \he challenges are no longer on fill!! for roviewwith Iho eJection board, Stewart said Qbome i51101 the only poljtlcian It;) «I50rt (0 petition chalreng.es to eliminate \he CCllI'Ip8lition.

'1-Ie came lrom Chicago poI~jCl," Stewart IBid. "Politics ail'll beanbag, 8S they ny in Chicago. You play wilh yo\X elbows up, and you'ro prelly tough lind nAhklsswhen you haVI!! to be. Seo. Obama fa\! thers what was neceu.ary 8th limo, lhars what he did. Does 111M in with the ihatoric now? Perhaps not"

The Obama campaign called this report "a hit job." It insistad that CNN tatk to a stale rapt'eseillativewoo suppon.s Obem:!, bocouso, accortflllg to an Obama spoile$lTlWl, she WOUld be obJ9Clive, But vmenwa caJed her, '~salel she eanl (ecall !SMails 01 petition challenges, who engincered lhem for tile Obama calTl'8ign or why nil the ClInc1idate& were chtllfenged.

But 'MIl Burns does. Now running himselffor II seat i'l the (Iiroi! lagisltlture, Bums wag 8 young Oooma volt.lIlteor during Ihq prosid&l"lliot carodidats's firsl (lice.

Bums wos ono oflhe oontingenlS 01 volunteers and lawyers wtlo had lhe leOous task of going rNer eaCh and lWory PQlIlion Sl.bItHUed by lhe olhtlr candidates, iOcluding lhosa 01 ~ice Parmor.

"The ruleS are thare fOf 8 "'IISon," Bums said.

He said that Challonglng pe~tions is B smart Wrrt to avoid havir'lg to run 8 full-blown expensive r~ce.

pe~tions is B smart Wrrt to avoid havir'lg to run 8 full-blown expensive r~ce. 101"3 1120120


Obama played hardball in first Chicago campa. CNN.com

http://www.cnn.cOmiW/POLITICS/05/29/obamas. first.campaignli

Most Popular on CNN


Mo.tVlvMd •• Mo~.t~ma~-L.:.o~~c~~~


Hundl'ClaJ ut!JCld 10 no. California storm


Dtmt tonll,atl!iato Brown, elamno lou


Manhunt on In killings 0( a In VIrginia


GOP win ~y Ihnlatlin OtMIlN', domntic .gentU




'P.nt,' boeQIl'IIS first vir.l video of 2010


Brltbh Ncklash alPolnll SU

n BoyIo?


Petar.on defen.o milianga. 'CreIll'IIw'


70,000 OHIM t.ltkKf, Haitian PM A)"

10 House 011,", largely rajel;t Suo.te hooilth blR

10 House 011,", largely rajel;t Suo.te hooilth blR ~ VIDEOS , TOP)CI Ads by Googlc Adam



Ads by Googlc

Adam for Illinois Lcrml hnw Adam Andrzejewski is heralding a new day in lilinoisl www.lUlmnrurillinnis.colll Secret Wllr On The Dollar Read the Shocking Bulletin That Washington Does Not Wrml You 'fo Sec \\,ww.UncommonWisdomDailv,com

Reverse Lmm Calculator

Try Our Fre~Calculutor Today. Find Out How

Much YllU QUlllily t~orNow!

\\"\\'\\'. Rc vcr5c Mongagct\d\'iscr







• Pari TlInt Jobs

• SMtt &. t.t.kI,"oJobi

• CUltO!ro( Se(Vlce Jo~



enter city:


We Recommend

-1.- - -_-_- -



city: SI~. We Recommend -1.- - -_-_- - I. moreoptolds. MassachUSllt1 Sonate 1101, may derail Obama

MassachUSllt1 Sonate 1101, may derail Obama


Anary""; Brown'. win changellandscape

Oem. pelnt nngors after stunning loss

Many Houlo Dom" reJett Senate health Dill

A look at th. U.S. Sonato'. ,",se of the filibuster

Hom~ I Won:II U.s. 1PoIt\I:$ I cm.e I EIt!rUilvnen I He:lIllII Teen I TIM Illwlg I MlcIey I Spofts I Tme,eom

Worl'MIhUs J TOOl!; &WldgtlS I PodeaslS I Blogs I CN4M:1bMe I ~ptor""l E-mal.AJer1s 1CNNRKio I CH'lSh)p I SUM.1p

_- -;==================;



Obama played hardball in first Chicago campa. CNN.com

02000 CltJ'eNvw$~ TtmerB/'03CIC;ISIng ~em.I1c.N.RiIl\$R"tII'\ed.

Ternn 01 ~erw:e I PiMcyguidtll;lC$ 1 AINerIisewih 11$ I AbJuIUS f CorIUItlus I Help


How Hussein Seized the US Senate


Seized the US Senate http://www.stop-obama.orgl?p=188 • The story of how H-Obama was elected to the Senate

The story of how H-Obama was elected to the Senate is no different from how he made it to the Illinois Upper Chamber. Like his three elections and re-elections to that state's chamber, his run for the nationals was Phony.

When Hussein first became a "public official" in 1996, he did so by kicking all competitors off the ballot by lying to them and sacking them with a massive mafia-like legal offensive. Till this day, his main opponent maintains that she would have won, had it not been for these spurious tactics. Since 1996 Obama was re-elected to the Illinois Senate a total of two times in 1998, and 2002. Both times, he had either zero or virtually zero opposition in the Chicago Democratic Primary, and zero and virtually zero opposition in the General Election.

In 2000, Obama decided to try the US Congress, and was whooped by a Black Panther, with a four-term record and real experience. What did he conclude from this loss? Cheat, cheat, and never fight fair.

In 2004, the US Senator from Illinois Peter Fitzgerald chose not to run for reelection.

Illinois Peter Fitzgerald chose not to run for reelection. This opened the path to a heated

This opened the path to a heated Democratic Primary which Hussein won by having Axelrod dig up divorce papers on his biggest rival.

When time came to the general, same thing happened, divorce papers, Axelrod.

1·lence BarryO's frank admission that


Perhaps my greatest bit of good fortune during my own Senate campaign was that no candidate ran a negative TV ad about me. [Chang]

Good fortune or reign ofAxelrodian (mini-Goebbles or "mini-G") terror?

Obama had only one real contender in the Democratic Party Primary, out of five.

His name Blair Hull and he lead the pack. Then suddenly events turned against Hull,

About a month before the vote, The Chicago Tribune revealed, near the bottom of a long profile ofl-Iull, that during a divorce proceeding, Hull's second wife filed for an order of protection. In the following few days, the matter erupted into a full-fledged scandal that ended up destroying the Hull campaign and handing Obama an easy primary victory.

Full fledged scandal. Hull's

•• .Iead in the polls collapsed. [Almanac]

Another newspaper puts it as

Then allegations surfaced that he had threatened to kill bis wife during an argument, and that he was arrested for battery, although charges were never filed. Nevertheless, the damage to Hull's campaign was done. [maroon]

Guess who benefited?


The chief beneficiary of Hull's meltdown was a little-known state senator from Hyde Park. His name, of course, is Barack Obama. [maroon]

Maybe "little known," but with good cover. The info on Hull's abuse didn't just appear out of no-where, it was dug up by mini-G.

The Tribune reporter who wrote the original piece later acknowledged in print that the Obama camp had "worked aggressively behind the scenes" to push the story. But there are those in Chicago who believe that Axelrod had an even more significant role - that he Icaked the initial story. They note that before signing on with Obama, Axelrod interviewed with Hull [nytimes]

Talk about dirty. Mini-G interviewed with Hull, then took on Obama, and ran Hull out of the race with the info he plied out of him. Democracy here we come. Till this day

Axelrod is known for operating in this gray area, part idealist, part hired muscle. It is difficult to discuss Axelrod in certain circles in Chicago without the matter of the Blair Hull divorce papers coming up. [nytimes]


Then came round two - The General Election. Surprise surprise, Hussein again found himself blcssed by Allah-Gody-God (I am not insinuating Obama is a Muslim. He distorts the truth, not us. see facts; for our stance on Islam, see Jamal)

Barry-a blessing from Providence again had to do with divorce, and more sleaze.

Providence again had to do with divorce, and more sleaze. Since Rep-Peter Fitzgerald decided no to

Since Rep-Peter Fitzgerald decided no to run for re-election, the Illinois Republican party appointed a certian Jack Ryan to run for the seat, against the Democratic party's little known Husscin-O.

The Republican nominee was Jack Ryan, who led the eight-candidate field with 35% of the vote and, like Obama, had an attractive life story. [Almanac]

Had an attractive life story, and led the vote. Growing up poor with five siblings, going to Catholic school, making it big on Wall Street, dedicating his life to teaching in high-school.

Mini-G would have none of it.

But Ryan, like Hull, had a divorce problem. Before the primary he released the records of his California divorce from television actress Jeri Ryan, except for some passages which he said would be hannful to his nine-year-old son. After the primary the Chicago Tribune pressed for full disclosuure. In June a California judge agreed. It turned out that Ryan had pressed his former wife, against her wish, to go to sex clubs in Paris. Republican party leaders were luriolls that Ryan had not told them of this vulnerability, and pressed him to get out of the race. [Almanac]

Sex clubs in Paris, against her wishes? Same Chicago Tribune, same story as with Hull, same Oponent, Barry the Bamboozler. Massive coincidence. Massive.

Such coincidence even became a challange for our "little known"