Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Mark Leddin
ANSYS UK
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
11
Agenda
Structural Mechanics Simulation (CSM using finite
element analysis)
- Structural integrity performance for
complex structures and sub-structures
- Seismic assessment
- Geotechnical engineering
- Thermal bridging
Fluid-Structure-Interaction (FSI)
- Blast loading and structural response
- I-beam structural integrity under thermal loading
33
Product/Technology Description
Solver Technology
ANSYS
DesignSpace
ANSYS
Professional NLT
Linear Structural
Linear Structural
Steady State Thermal Steady State Thermal
Transient Thermal
Linear Dynamics
ANSYS
Structural
Linear Structural
Non-Linear Structural
Linear Dynamics
Nonlinear Dynamics
ANSYS
Professional NLS
ANSYS
Mechanical
Linear Structural
Non-Linear Structural
Linear Dynamics
Nonlinear Dynamics
Steady State Thermal
Transient Thermal
Acoustics
Direct Coupled
Linear Structural
Steady State Thermal
Nonlinear Structural
Linear Dynamics
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
PostProcessing
Materials
Boundaries
& Loads
Solution
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Geometry
Direct CAD Links
Connect to real CAD models
and create true parametric
analysis
Multi-core
32 & 64 bit
Clusters
GPU
10
Postprocessing
Stress, Strain,
Deformation, Creep,
Contact, Reactions.....
Images
Tabular data Excel
Movie files
Automated report
generation
11
Submodelling
Submodeling is a finite element
technique that you can use to
obtain more accurate results in
a particular region of a model.
A finite element mesh may be
too coarse to produce
satisfactory results in a given
region of interest. The results
away from this region,
however, may be satisfactory
Jackup Rig
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
12
13
14
Integral Method
15
Seismic assessment
16
16
Spectrum analysis
Deterministic:
Response Spectrum
Single-Point Response Spectrum
Multi-Point Response Spectrum
Dynamic Design Analysis Method
Probabilistic:
Random vibration
Power Spectral Density (PSD)
17
18
Large model
Long transient
Large model
Long transient
Large model
Mode extraction
Mode shapes
Combined solution
Fast, approximate
Full solution
Slow, accurate
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Small model
Long transient
Response spectrum
19
= 30 Hz
S = 95 m/s2
= 50 Hz
S = 138 m/s2
20
= 70 Hz
S = 86 m/s2
Spectral Regions
Two frequencies can often be identified on a response spectrum
This divides the spectrum into three regions
low
frequency
mid
frequency
high
frequency
21
fSP
fZPA
Mode Combination
Whereas the SRSS method takes the following form,
N
2
R Ri
i 1
1
2
The CQC and ROSE methods introduce a double sum and a correlation
coefficient.
CQC
N N
R k ij Ri Rj
i 1 j i
ROSE
1
2
N N
R ij Ri Rj
i 1 j 1
1
2
22
Spectrum analysis
23
24
Spectrum analysis
Modal analysis
25
Spectrum analysis
RS loading
26
Spectrum analysis
Results
27
Geotechnical
28
28
Drucker-Prager Plasticity
Drucker-Prager (DP) plasticity is applicable to granular
(frictional) materials such as soils, rock, and concrete.
Unlike metal plasticity, the yield surface is a pressuredependent von Mises surface for DP:
s eqv
F 3bs m
s y
s2
3
s1 s2 s3
s1
s3
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
29
30
Displacement Plot
31
Concrete Model
The concrete material model in ANSYS can
be used to model brittle materials, such as
concrete, rock and ceramics.
Both cracking and crushing failure modes
are included.
Prior to failure, behavior is assumed to be
linear elastic. However, plasticity and/or
creep may be combined with concrete to
provide nonlinear behavior prior to failure.
This constitutive model is meant for low
tensile strength but high compressive load
carrying capability.
A smeared reinforcement can be
specified via real constants along three
element coordinate directions, or discrete
reinforcements can be separately added
via LINK or COMBIN elements.
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
32
33
34
Recent Innovation
New Coupled Pore-Pressure
Mechanical Solids
Fluid flow through porous media
Single phase, based on extended Biotconsolidation theory
Benefits
Allows for modeling of fluid pore
pressure in soils and biomedical
materials
Model Courtesy of
Applications
Bone and prosthetic implants
Foundation and excavation analysis
Geological, Oil & Gas industry
Image Courtesy of Archus Orthopedics
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
35
Thermal Bridging
36
36
37
3D Case
Mesh
20 noded hexahedral
Options:
Low order elements
Tetrahedrals
38
3D Case
Boundary conditions
Alpha
Beta
Delta
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
3D Case
Results
40
BS
ANSYS
Difference
Difference rounded
12.9
12.909
0.009
0.0
11.3
11.279
-0.021
0.0
16.4
16.363
-0.037
0.0
12.6
12.554
-0.046
0.0
11.1
11.074
-0.026
0.0
15.3
15.241
-0.059
-0.1
Alpha
46.3
46.109
0.191
0.4
Beta
14
13.904
0.096
0.7
Gamma
60.3
60.013
0.287
0.5
41
Difference %
FSI
Blast Loading on
Structures Explicit
Dynamics
42
42
Why Explicit?
Because
equilibrium iteration needed
no
material
ceramic impact
high
fast
implicit-explicit
no
hypervelocity impact
drop test
ship collision
43
ANSYS AUTODYN
Ground Shock
Urban Blast
Pipe bomb
Faade Response
Contact Charge
44
46
AUTODYN Simulations of a
Brick Store House
3 charge sizes
24 kg
8 kg
~ 1 kg
Two Configurations
With a reinforced
concrete roof
Open at the top
2mx2mx2m
47
48
Structural Response
49
Euler-Lagrange Coupling
50
Mine blast
Blast on windows/glazing
In Kabul suicide car bomber rammed bus killing
4 and wounding 29.
Almost all injuries attributed to flying shards of
glass.
To reduce the hazards of flying glass shards,
the German Defense Ministry is assessing
various safety concepts for bus windows using:
Standard glazing
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
52
Polycarbonate Glazing
ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary
53
Implicit to Explicit
Procedure (Stage 1)
Static structural implicit
used to apply gravity
loading
Example Application
Bomb blast on bridge
Stresses
10
5
1000 kg TNT
54
Implicit to Explicit
Example Application
Bomb blast on bridge
Procedure (Stage 2)
Transfer model and results
to AUTODYN
Add Euler-FCT, used to
represent air and explosive
Blast-Structure Interaction
(FSI) solve in AUTODYN
Determine bridge damage
Damage
Courtesy EMT-R, Russia
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
55
Implicit to Explicit
56
FSI
57
57
Description
58
Geometry
4m
4m
4m
Fire position
Open End
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
60
Project Schematic
61
Geometry
Multibody parts created, with solid bodies for the
fluid (air) and solid geometry.
The appropriate bodies can be active or suppressed depending
on which physics you are working with.
62
Material Properties
Structural Properties defined in Engineering Materials
Property tables entered as functions of temperature
64
Structural Setup
Frictional Contact added under Connections
Surface-to-Surface contact between
beams and ceiling.
Contact offset of 1cm to allow air flow
between surfaces if they separate
Edge(node)-to-Surface between
beams and fixed support emulating
wall beneath.
Augmented Lagrange formulation.
Normal stiffness factor together with
appropriate pinball radius applied
to give efficient contact convergence.
66
Structural Setup
Loads and Constraints are added to model
Gravity added
Zero vertical displacement at ceiling edges and at beam supports
(wall support)
Rigid body dof constraints (for stability)
Large pressure load added to top surface to simulate effect of
upper storey presence.
67
Structural Setup
Analysis Settings added for coupled simulation
68
Single air fluid material used, with Ideal Gas equation for density
and full buoyancy effects.
71
CFX Setup
Domain Physics
72
74
Temperature
Probes
CFD Residuals
FEA Residuals
Coupling
Residuals
CFD Output
FEA Output
Displacement
Probes
75
76
77
78
79
Conclusions
ANSYS can solve the complete fluid-structurethermal interaction scenario of a fire in an enclosed
room.
It has the tools to include complex geometric and
physical details.
The coupled software has not been tested for the
collapse process itself, and difficulties are
specifically anticipated in sustaining two-way
coupling during impact between structures during
the collapse (if that occurs).
However, the coupled software is able to analyze
events up to collapse, and the structural software can
analyze the collapse.
2011 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
80
Overall Conclusions
81