Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
8 6
2008 12
Vol.8 No.6
Dec. 2008
1 INTRODUCTION
[1]
2 EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 Materials and Analysis Method for Hydrolysate
Hydrolysate from the runs of hydrolysis reactions
of biomass of sawdust in dilute sulphuric acid was
collected as experimental material. Monosaccharides
were analyzed through external standard method on
HPLC (LC-20AT, Shimadzu, Japan) and the detector
was Polymer Laboratories PL-ELS 2100 (move phase
acetonitrile:water=23:77(), total flow rate at 0.8
mL/min, nebulization temperature 40, gasification
temperature 70, column intersil-NH2, 4.6 mm250
mm, 5-Micron). The main components besides
QI Wei, et al.: Degradation Kinetics of Xylose and Glucose in Hydrolysate Containing Dilute Sulfuric Acid
1133
100
A
80
Intensity (%)
60
40
20
C
D
0
0
10
12
14
Time (min)
Xylose
27.51
Glucose
35.49
Acetic acid
0.786 0
Furfural
0.397 0
Levulic acid
0.261 0
Hydroxymethyl furfural
0.035 00
1134
150
Concentration (cs/cs0)
1.0
160
1.0
0.8
0.8
170
1.0
0.8
1.0
180
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0
10 15 20 25
Time (min)
10 15 20 25
Time (min)
10 15 20 25
Time (min)
10 15 20 25
Time (min)
Fig.3 Xylose concentration vs. time at various acid concentrations and temperatures
Acid conc. (mol/L)
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Concentration (cs/cs0)
150
1.0
160
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.6
1.0
170
0.8
1.0
180
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.4
0.7
0
0.0
0
10 15 20 25
Time (min)
10 15 20 25
Time (min)
10 15 20 25
Time (min)
10 15 20 25
Time (min)
Fig.4 Glucose concentration vs. time at various acid concentrations and temperatures
160
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.2
0
10
15
20
25
Time (min)
Glucose Xylose T ()
160
170
180
1.0
Concentration (cs/cso)
Concentration (cs/cso)
1.0
10
15
20
25
Time (min)
QI Wei, et al.: Degradation Kinetics of Xylose and Glucose in Hydrolysate Containing Dilute Sulfuric Acid
(1)
dcs
= kcsn .
dt
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
cs
E
= exp k0 [H + ]a exp
t.
cs0
RT
(7)
or
1135
i =1
(8)
Monosaccharide
Xylose
Glucose
E (kJ/mol)
114.4
136.8
a
0.649
0.673
k0
2.3841011
4.8341013
Xylose
Glucose
M
Mp
3
3
Parameter
A
R2
0.242 3 0.958 7
0.301 7 0.959 2
j =1
F
1 648.58
1 834.62
(c
j =1
cs0 )exp ,
2
M
2
2
M
( cs cs0 )exp ( cs cs0 )exp ( cs cs0 )cal M
j =1
j =1
F=
.
M
2
c
c
c
c
M
M
(
)
(
)
(
s
s0 cal
p)
s s0 exp
j =1
10F0.05
27.900
27.459
(9)
(10)
1136
8
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
cs/cs0,cal
cs/cs0,cal
Xylose
0.4
Glucose
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
cs/cs0,exp
cs/cs0,exp
2.5
3.0
Xylose
Glucose
2.0
1.5
1.0
6.0
4.5
Xylose
Glucose
3.0
1.5
0.5
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
[H ] (mol/L)
0.0
420
430
440
450
460
T ( )
Fig.7 Effects of hydrogen ion concentration and reaction temperature on the rate constant of xylose and glucose
is expressed as
114.4 103
dc
= 2.384 1011[H + ]0.649 exp
c [mol/(Ls)], (11)
dt
RT
0.673
136.8 103
dc
= 4.834 1013 H + exp
c [mol/(Ls)]. (12)
dt
RT
QI Wei, et al.: Degradation Kinetics of Xylose and Glucose in Hydrolysate Containing Dilute Sulfuric Acid
5 CONCLUSIONS
Degradation of monosaccharide, xylose or glucose
with sulfuric acid as catalyst in biomass hydrolysate is a
first order reaction, and its degradation rate is
significantly affected by the hydrogen ion concentration
in the hydrolysate. Based on the kinetic data of xylose
and glucose degradation obtained from a stainless steel
autoclave, a simplified kinetic model was developed
taking all pathways into consideration. The best fit
parameters were determined by nonlinear regression
analysis. Comparisons of results calculated from the
kinetic equations of xylose and glucose with the
experimental ones proved that the kinetic model
established in this work could satisfactorily predict the
degradation of xylose and glucose over a broad range of
acid concentrations. Degradation of xylose and glucose
in the hydrolysate is a side by side reaction system, and
the degradation reaction of xylose quicker than that of
glucose. Careful selection of reaction conditions is
necessary in order to obtain high yield of
monosaccharide in acidic hydrolysis of biomass,
because of differences in activation energy and
degradation rate constant.
1137
DENOTATION:
a
A
cs
cs0
D
E
F
[H+]
k
k0
k0'
M
Mp
n
R
R2
S
t
REFERENCES:
[1] Campbell C J, Laherrre J H. The End of Cheap Oil. [J]. Sci. Am.,
1998, 3: 7883.
[2] Sun Y, Cheng J Y. Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Materials for Ethanol
Production: A Review [J]. Bioresour. Thechnol., 2002, 83: 111.
[3] Zhao H B, Kwaj J H, Zhang Z C, et al. Studying Cellulose Fiber