Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2015
doi: 10.1111/anu.12266
..........................................................................................
..............................................................................................
Tilapia culture has grown rapidly during the past two decades, so that tilapias are currently the second largest
farmed finfish group in the world, only after carps (FAO
2014). This rapid industrialization of tilapia production in
recent years has led to gradual shift in tilapia culture from
extensive and semi-intensive systems to more intensive
farming practices, with an increasing demand for quality
seeds and dependence on formulated feeds (El-Sayed 2006).
Therefore, the production of sufficient quantities of highquality seeds and the formulation of appropriate, costeffective feeds have become a major challenge facing tilapia
culture industry. This means that the profitability of tilapia
culture is directly related to the quality of the seeds used
and the quantity and quality of feed consumed by the fish.
The shortage of quality tilapia seed production to meet the
increasing farmers demand remains one of the major challenges facing the expansion of tilapia culture (El-Sayed 2006).
Therefore, considerable attention has been paid to larval rearing and nutrition of farmed tilapia during the past two decades. Similarly, the nutrient requirements and feeding
management of tilapia broodstock have been extensively studied (Gunasekera et al. 1996a,b; Gunasekera & Lam 1997;
El-Sayed et al. 2003, 2005; El-Sayed & Kawanna 2008).
The increasing demand for fish meal (FM) accompanied
by shortage in global supply has resulted in escalating FM
prices during the past few years (Tacon et al. 2012). Therefore, intensive efforts have been given to the replacement
of FM with less costly and more available plant protein
sources for aquaculture feed production. In this regard,
..............................................................................................
Four SBM-based, isonitrogenous (400 g kg1 cp), isoenergetic (19 MJ kg1) diets were prepared, containing four
concentrations of taurine (0.0, 5.0, 10.0 and 15.0 g kg1;
designated as T0, T0.5, T1 and T1.5, respectively). In fact,
when we started this series of experiments on taurine
requirement of Nile tilapia, we used five levels (0.0, 5.0,
10.0, 15.0 and 20.0 g kg1) fed to fingerling fish (1.0 g).
We found that beyond 10.0 dietary taurine, the performance and survival of the fish were reduced substantially
(data are being processed for publication). Therefore, we
decided to reduce the inclusion levels to four (0.0, 5.0, 10.0
and 15.0 g kg1) for broodstock study and larval study.
The composition and proximate analysis and amino acid
profiles of the diets are shown in Tables 1 & 2. The diets
were prepared as described by El-Sayed et al. (2013). The
fish were fed the test diets to apparent satiation, three times
per day (at 09.00, 13.00 and 17.00 h), for 60 days. The fish
in each aquarium were collected and weighed at 15-day
intervals, and the average weights were recorded. The
amounts of feed consumed by fish in each aquarium during
each feeding interval were also recorded.
Table 1 Composition and proximate analysis (g kg1 dry weight) of the test diets
Experimental diets
Ingredients
T0
T0.5
T1
T1.5
Fish meal
Soybean meal
Wheat bran
Taurine
Soybean oil
Fish oil
Vitamins and minerals mix1
Dicalcium phosphate
Binder (CMC)2
Total
Crude protein
Ether extract
Crude fibre
Ash
NFE3
Taurine
GE4
100
700
110
0.0
20
20
20
20
10
1000
404.0
81.0
31.3
141.0
342.7
0.9
18.78
100
700
105
5
20
20
20
20
10
1000
396.1
79.3
28.0
134.0
362.6
7.0
18.87
100
700
100
10
20
20
20
20
10
1000
398.8
82.1
35.0
128.0
356.1
11.0
18.93
100
700
95
15
20
20
20
20
10
1000
392.9
75.5
30.0
130.0
371.6
16.5
18.80
Vitamins & minerals mixture contains mg kg1 or IU kg1 of dry vitamins & minerals powder: Vit. A 2 200 000 IU., Vit. D3 1 100 000
I.U., Vit. E 1500 I.U., Vit. K 800 mg, Vit. B1 1100 mg, Vit. B2 200 mg, Vit. B6 2000 mg, Vit. H 15 mg, Vit. B12 4 mg, Vit. C 3000 mg, Iron
160 mg, Magnesium 334 mg, Copper 21.6 mg, Zink 21.6 mg, Selenium 25 mg, Cobalt 2.38 mg.
2
Carboxymethyl cellulose used as binder.
3
Nitrogen-free extract determined by difference.
4
Gross energy calculated based on 23.64, 39.54 and 17.57 KJ g1 for protein, lipid and carbohydrate, respectively.
1
..............................................................................................
Experimental diets
Amino acid
T0
T0.5
T1
T1.5
Lysine
Methionine
Threonine
Tryptophan
Arginine
Phenylalanine
Histidine
Isoleucine
Leucine
Valine
Cysteine
Alanine
Glutamic acid
Glycine
Serine
Aspartic acid
Proline
Taurine
2.27
0.54
1.25
0.58
3.01
1.56
0.98
1.15
2.32
2.13
0.41
2.00
6.86
1.51
1.62
3.68
2.42
0.09
2.31
0.55
1.26
0.61
2.87
1.42
0.98
1.22
2.51
2.10
0.35
2.14
6.69
1.44
1.58
3.38
2.41
0.70
2.26
0.54
1.25
0.60
2.94
1.66
0.95
1.16
2.38
2.21
0.39
2.01
6.58
1.40
1.56
3.43
2.39
1.10
2.17
0.51
1.20
0.58
3.00
1.58
1.02
1.21
2.44
1.99
0.42
1.96
6.62
1.39
1.60
3.52
2.27
1.65
Table 3 Effects of dietary taurine supplementation on growth rates, feed utilization and survival (mean SEM) of Nile tilapia fry
Experimental diets
Growth parameter
T0
1
0.024
1.18
4817
6.49
1.82
1.57
23.32
84.50
T0.5
0.011d
48d
0.02d
0.087b
0.05b
0.85c
0.29a
T1
0.024
1.61
6608
7.01
2.44
1.54
27.39
86.33
0.02b
87b
0.02b
0.050a
0.05b
1.24b
4.06a
0.024
1.94
7997
7.32
2.68
1.40
35.55
85.33
T1.5
0.08a
337a
0.07a
0.017a
0.07a
2.24a
2.33a
0.024
1.46
5983
6.84
2.43
1.69
26.22
75.34
0.03c
127c
0.04c
0.044a
0.02c
0.22b
1.45b
Values in the same row with different letters are significantly different at P = 0.05.
..............................................................................................
supplemental taurine to 15 kg1 resulted in a sharp reduction in fish survival (P < 0.05).
Body composition of Nile tilapia larvae was significantly
affected (P < 0.05) by dietary taurine supplementation
(Table 4). Body moisture and ash decreased with increasing
dietary taurine up to 10 kg1 and increased afterwards.
Body protein significantly increased with increasing dietary
taurine up to 10 kg1 and levelled off with further taurine
supplementation to 15 kg1. Body lipid was also significantly increased with increasing supplemental taurine up to
10 kg1 and decreased with further taurine supplementation to 15 kg1.
The following body amino acids (tryptophan, arginine,
histidine, leucine, isoleucine, threonine, valine, alanine, glycine and taurine) significantly increased (P < 0.05) with
increasing supplemental taurine up to 10 g kg1 and then
decreased, or levelled off (leucine and taurine) with further
increase in taurine levels (Table 5). On the other hand,
other amino acids (lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, cysteine, glutamic acid, serine, aspartic acid and proline) were
not significantly affected by dietary taurine (P > 0.05).
Table 4 Body composition (g kg1) (mean SEM) on wet weight basis of Nile tilapia larvae fed the test diets
Experimental diets
Composition (g kg1)
Moisture
Protein
Lipid
Ash
Initial
T0
692.00
187.89
40.69
85.62
740.22
147.82
44.85
66.35
T0.5
2.82
1.72a
0.36a
0.26b
729.41
166.00
51.11
60.87
T1
2.37
0.25b
1.19b
1.58a
T1.5
683.13
168.91
58.24
66.73
3.3
0.38c
1.96c
2.94b
703.20
168.07
54.69
72.21
1.56c
1.23c
1.86d
0.98c
Values in the same row with different letters are significantly different at P = 0.05.
Table 5 Amino acid profiles in whole body (mean SEM) (% dry weight) of Nile tilapia fry fed the test diets
Experimental diets
Body amino acid
T0
Lysine
Methionine
Threonine
Tryptophan
Arginine
Phenylalanine
Histidine
Isoleucine
Leucine
Valine
Cysteine
Alanine
Glutamic acid
Glycine
Serine
Aspartic acid
Proline
Taurine
Total
3.66
1.47
1.87
0.54
2.46
1.79
1.22
2.64
3.29
2.43
0.77
2.93
6.57
2.60
1.74
5.58
3.10
0.13
44.83
T0.5
0.04a
0.012a
0.08b
0.003d
0.05c
0.11a
0.017d
0.011b
0.02b
0.08b
0.011a
0.02b
0.34a
0.02c
0.07a
0.25a
0.20a
0.003c
1.06a
3.71
1.42
2.19
0.60
2.79
1.79
1.59
2.67
3.52
2.71
0.72
2.95
6.91
2.73
1.57
4.98
2.69
0.74
46.36
T1
0.01a
0.08a
0.005a
0.005b
0.09b
0.066a
0.035b
0.02b
0.035a
0.11ab
0.026a
0.035b
0.29a
0.025b
0.005a
0.17a
0.16a
0.04b
0.84a
Values in the same row with different letters are significantly different at P = 0.05.
..............................................................................................
3.90
1.37
2.31
0.65
3.09
1.90
1.74
2.85
3.72
2.85
0.74
3.16
6.79
2.87
1.71
4.93
2.82
1.09
48.57
T1.5
0.02a
0.13a
0.01a
0.007a
0.016a
0.05a
0.040a
0.051a
0.013a
0.027a
0.004a
0.05a
0.76a
0.045a
0.02a
0.03a
0.065a
0.09a
1.16a
3.63
1.42
1.91
0.58
2.60
1.83
1.29
2.70
3.59
2.65
0.78
2.91
6.32
2.66
1.76
5.06
3.05
1.15
45.84
0.16a
0.09a
0.05b
0.001c
0.04bc
0.019a
0.004c
0.004b
0.13a
0.05ab
0.032a
0.048b
0.11a
0.015bc
0.22a
0.18a
0.19a
0.06a
0.52a
..............................................................................................
The authors thank GISIS Company, Ecuador, for providing the taurine that was used in the present study.
..............................................................................................
..............................................................................................