Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Married
Same-Sex Couples
in the United States
UnitedStates
(ACS2013Galuup2015)
400000
350000
300000
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
$185
million in state
and local tax
revenue and
generate
Demographics-of-Married!and!!
could
create over
That boost could
generate
Unmarried)Same"sex$Couples:!!
million
in state
and .
13,000
jobs
Marriage Opinions since 2004 and Projecting to$185
2016 Estimates
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Analyses(of(the(2013(American)Community)Survey
March!2015
local tax
by Gary J. Gates
Executive)Summary)
28%
22%
times
19%
8%
Same-sex couples
All couples
Unmarried
3%
3%
1.5%
1.4%
0.7%2%
Married
3%
All
4%
Unmarried
All
Married
Different-sex couples
An estimated 122,000 same-sex couples are raising children under age 18. The median annual household income
of these couples is more than 5% lower than the median annual household income of different-sex couples raising
32 states
328,000
10%
81%
54%
Number of
Floridian LGBT
Workers
Income Disparity
between
Straight and Gay
Male Workers
in Florida
Transgender
Floridian Workers
Reporting Workplace
Discrimination
Transgender
Floridian Workers
Reporting Workplace
Discrimination
Transgender workplace
discrimination (National
Transgender
respondents experienced unemployment
Transgender
Transgender Discrimination Survey)
respondents experienced
at twice the rate of the general population,
unemployment at
Transgender
workplace
and Denied
44%
reported
experiencing
under-employment.
a promotion
23%
discrimination (National twice the rate of
Transg
the general population,
and
Fired
26% Discrimination
Transgender
workplace discrimination
Transgender
Survey)
respondents ex
44% reported
unemploym
experiencing
undertwice the
the general popu
employment
.
44%
Not hired
Harassed at work
44%
Denied a promotion
23%
50%
Fired
Mistreatment or discrimination
78%
Not hired
26%
ex
44%
Harassed at work
u
employ
50%
Mistreatment or discrimination
78%
LGBT-supportive
policies have been found to be good
However, many LGBT-supportive policies
for employers.
have been found to be good for employers.
However, many LGBT-supportive
policies
have
been found
to be good
of studies
showing relationship
between
LGBT-supportive
policies
NumberNumber
of studies
showing
relationship
between
LGBT-supportive
or workplace climates and economic outcomes
policies or workplace
climates for
and employers.
economic outcomes
However, many
16
2 1
14
3
11
Number of studies showing
relationship
between LGBT-su
More openness about being LGBT
1
8
policies or workplace
climates
and economic outcom
Increased job satisfaction
Increased productivity
16
2 1
14
3
11
Positive business relationship
1
8
3
11
3
1
18%
18%
9%
9%
Household income
income
Household
below $24,000
$24,000
below
13%
13%
18%
18%
25%
25%
Not enough
enough money
money for
for Not
Not enough
enough money
money for
for Not
Not enough
enough money
money for
for
Not
food
shelter
health care
care
food
shelter
health
Non-LGBT
Non-LGBT
LGBT
LGBT
exacerbated in
states
that doLGBT
not prohibit
that do not
prohibit
discrimination.
LGBT discrimination.
Household
income
difference
forsame-sex
same-sex couples
with
children
Household
income
difference
for
couples
with
children
compared to their different-sex married parent counterparts
compared to their different-sex married parent counterparts
Nationwide
Nationwide
-$7,600.00
-$7,600.00
States with
with LGB
LGB NonNonStates
Discrimination
State
Laws
Discrimination State Laws
States without
without LGB
LGB NonNonStates
Discrimination
State
Laws
Discrimination State Laws
-$4,300.00
-$4,300.00
-$11,300.00
-$11,300.00
Approximately
Approximately
700,000
adults
living
inthe
the
United
States
Approximately
700,000
adults
in
United
States
identify
as
Approximately
700,000
adults
living inliving
the United
States identify
as
Despite being barred from serving openly, nearly
being barred
from serving
DespiteDespite
being barred
from
serving
openly,openly,
nearly nearly
or have
Despite being barredserve
from serving
openly, nearly
or have
serve
orserve
have
150,000 serve
or have
served
, which is in the U.S. military,
is general
which is twice the, which
rate of,iswhich
theofgeneral
population
the
population
of the general
population
of the general
population
150,000
served in the
150,000
served
in the
150,000
served
in
the
U.S. military
twice the rate
U.S.
military
twice
the rate
U.S. military
twice
the rate
Veterans,
Active
retired
Veterans, duty
Active
Veterans,
Active
134,300
retired
15,500
duty
retired
duty
134,300
15,500
134,300
15,500
disenfranchised
disenfranchised
disenfranchised
more than
disenfranchised
more
than
one
in
one inmore
four transgender
people
than
one
more
than
onepeople
in in
four
transgender
living in strict voter ID states or
four
transgender
people
living
in strict
voter
ID states
four
transgender
people
24,000
individuals
in the 2014
living
strictIDvoter
ID states
living
in
strictinvoter
states
24,000
or
general elections.
or 24,000
or 24,000
individuals in the
individuals
2014
general elections.
individuals
in the in the
2014 general
elections.
2014 general
elections.
The vast
majority
of
related
health
care
The
vastdo
majority
of
not
The employers
vast
majority
of
employers
provide
coverage
for
employers
do
not do not
coverage
for
provideprovide
coverage
for
transitiontransitiontransitionrelated
related
related
health care
health
health
carecare
Nevertheless,
a surveyaofsurvey
employers
who
Nevertheless,
of employers
Nevertheless,
a survey
who transition-related
provided
health
provided
health
careof employers
Nevertheless,
atransition-related
survey
of employers
whocare
provided
transition-related
health
benefits
found them to have
who
provided
transition-related
very
benefits
found them
to have zero or health
care benefits
foundtothem
care benefits
found them
haveto have
,
low costs, low utilization, and yet it
,
,
provided benefits for both employers
, and yet it
, and
and employees.
, and yet
it yet it
provided
for both
provided
provided
for bothfor both
More than
LGBTQ
LGBQ
LGBQ
Same-Sex Attracted
Same-Sex Attracted
Gender Non-Conforming
Gender Non-Conforming
Transgender
Transgender
5.6%
overrepresented in
overrepresented
incare
19.1%
the
foster
LGBTQ youth are
overrepresented
19.1%
13.4%
the
care
in thesystem
fosterfoster
care
system.
While
. While
about
7% of
13.4%
13.2%
about
7% of American
youth 7%
identify
system
. While
American
youthabout
identify
asofLGBTQ,
13.2%
American
youth
identify
as LGBTQ,
19%
of youthas
in LGBTQ,
LA County
11.1%
19%
of youth in LA County
foster
care
identified
as LA
LGBTQ.
11.1%
19%
of youth
in
County
foster
care identified
as LGBTQ.
5.6%
foster care identified as LGBTQ.
TopTop
reasons
homeless
providers
reasons
homeless youth
youth providers
cited
for
youth
homelessness
or riskor risk
Topcited
reasons
homeless
youth
providers
forLGBT
LGBT
youth
homelessness
cited for LGBT youth homelessness or risk
46%
30% 43%
30% 43%
17%
14%
More than
32%
17%
43%
32%
46%
43%
14%
2.7 million
New
Diagnoses
New HIV
HIV
Diagnoses per
per 100,000
100,000 (2008-2011)
(2008-2011)
New HIV Diagnoses per 100,000 (2008-2011)
47.2
47.2
21.6
21.6
Northeast
Northeast
25.4
25.4
54.9
54.9
10.7
10.7
Midwest
Midwest
people
people living
living with
with HIV
HIV in
in
LA
County
reported
LA County reported
61.6
61.6
25.1
25.1
10.7
10.7
South
South
Mountain
Mountain
Men
MenWho
Who Have
Have Sex
Sexwith
with Men
Men
US
US Population
Population
New H
54.4
54.4
47.2
16.2
16.221.6
Pacific
Pacific
Northeast
Most
prevalent
legal
issue areas
reported
Most
legal
issue
areas
reported
Most prevalent
prevalent
legal
issue
areas
reported
98%
of low-incom
Testamentary
TestamentaryDocuments
Documents && Directives
Directives
Consumer
Consumer Law
Law
Health
Health Care
Care Access
Access
Housing
Housing
Public
Public Benefits
Benefits
Criminal
Criminal
Discrimination
Discrimination
Immigration
Immigration
people living
85%
85%with HI
LA
49%
49%County reported
legal needs in
42%
42%
past year, but 16%
30%
30%
28%
28% sought and found
21%
21%
help from a
19%
19%
lawyer.
47%
47%
more more
than 1 million
could save
than 1lives.
million lives..
could save
10
11
GARY J. GATES, THE WILLIAMS INST. UNIV. OF CAL. L.A. SCH. OF LAW, HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE LESBIAN, GAY,
BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER? (2011), http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Gates-HowMany-People-LGBT-Apr-2011.pdf.
JODY L. HERMAN, THE WILLIAMS INST. UNIV. OF CAL. L.A. SCH. OF LAW, THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF VOTER
IDENTIFICATION LAWS ON TRANSGENDER VOTERS IN THE 2014 GENERAL ELECTION (2014),
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/voter-id-laws-september-2014.pdf.
JODY L. HERMAN, THE WILLIAMS INST. UNIV. OF CAL. L.A. SCH. OF LAW, COSTS AND BENEFITS OF PROVIDING
TRANSITION- RELATED HEALTH CARE COVERAGE IN EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFITS PLANS: FINDINGS FROM A
SURVEY OF EMPLOYERS (2013), http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Herman-Cost-Benefit-ofTrans-Health-Benefits-Sept-2013.pdf.
BIANCA D.M. WILSON, KHUSH COOPER, ANGELIKI KASTANIS & SHEILA NEZHAD, SEXUAL AND GENDER
MINORITY YOUTH IN FOSTER CARE: ASSESSING DISPROPORTIONALITY AND DISPARITIES IN LOS ANGELES (2014),
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/LAFYS_report_final-aug-2014.pdf.
LAURA E. DURSO AND GARY J. GATES, SERVING OUR YOUTH: FINDINGS FROM A NATIONAL SURVEY OF
SERVICES PROVIDERS WORKING WITH LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER YOUTH WHO ARE
HOMELESS OR AT RISK OF BECOMING HOMELESS (2012), http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/
uploads/Durso-Gates-LGBT-Homeless-Youth-Survey-July-2012.pdf.
CHRISTY MALLORY, BRAD SEARS, AMIRA HASENBUSH & ALEXANDRA SUSMAN, THE WILLIAMS INST. UNIV.
OF CAL. L.A. SCH. OF LAW, ENSURING ACCESS TO MENTORING PROGRAMS FOR LGBTQ YOUTH (2014), http://
williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Access-to-Youth-Mentoring-Programs.pdf.
FRANK H. GALVAN & MOHSEN BAZARGAN, BIENESTAR, INTERACTIONS OF LATINA TRANSGENDER WOMEN
WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT (2012), http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Galvan-BazarganInteractions-April-2012.pdf.
CHRISTY MALLORY, AMIRA HASENBUSH & BRAD SEARS, THE WILLIAMS INST. UNIV. OF CAL. L.A. SCH. OF
LAW, DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN THE LGBT COMMUNITY
(2015), http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/LGBT-Discrimination-and-Harassment-in-LawEnforcement-March-2015.pdf.
CHRISTY MALLORY, AMIRA HASENBUSH & BRAD SEARS, THE WILLIAMS INST. UNIV. OF CAL. L.A. SCH. OF LAW,
DISCRIMINATION AGAINST LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ON THE BASIS OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND
GENDER IDENTITY: 2000-2013 (2013), http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Law-EnforcementDiscrim-Report-Nov-2013.pdf.
AYAKO MIYASHITA, AMIRA HASENBUSH, BIANCA D.M. WILSON, ILAN MEYER, SHEILA NEZHAD & BRAD
SEARS, THE WILLIAMS INST. UNIV. OF CAL. L.A. SCH. OF LAW, THE LEGAL NEEDS OF PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV:
EVALUATING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN LOS ANGELES (2015), http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/
uploads/Legal-Needs-People-Living-with-HIV-Los-Angeles-County-April-2015.pdf.
AYAKO MIYASHITA & GARY J. GATES, THE WILLIAMS INST. UNIV. OF CAL. L.A. SCH. OF LAW, UPDATE: EFFECTS
OF LIFTING BLOOD DONATION BANS ON MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN (2014), http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.
edu/wp-content/uploads/Blood-Ban-update-Jan-2015.pdf.
12
13