Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Big data
You have it, now use it.
2011 Number 4
This Quarter
Several other quiet but potent forces run through this issue. Santa Fe
Institute professor W. Brian Arthur describes how a second
economy of machine-to-machine interactions is imperceptibly taking
root beneath the surface of the physical world, potentially overtaking it in economic importance within the next 20 years. McKinseys
Joanna Barsh and Lareina Yee present research about the silent
killer of womens careersrarely acknowledged but widely held mindsets that often block the path to the C-suiteand suggest some
robust antidotes for companies that are serious about boosting the
number of women in their senior ranks. At a personal level, we all
know that honest feedback from colleagues can help us stay in touch.
But a cone of silence surrounds many CEOs and their top teams,
says Harvard Business School professor Robert S. Kaplan, who has some
pointed advice for turning up the volume.
Finally, a coalition of experts from McKinseys oil and gas, automotive,
strategy, and operations practices explores the implications of
another quiet trend: the historic rise of oil consumption in emerging
markets. While good news in that it reflects economic improvement for
millions, steadily rising demand could strain global supply capacity
in the years ahead. Well-coordinated regulatory and behavioral
changes throughout the world may get us through the crunch, say Scott
Nyquist and his colleagues. But an unexpected oil price spike is
also possible. Presented here are some no-regrets moves companies
can make now to prepare strategically and operationally.
Easy as it is for issues like these to get drowned out by the din of daily
battle, staying ahead of them may well make all the difference in
the years ahead. We hope this issue of the Quarterly helps you keep your
organization focused today on what will matter most tomorrow.
Allen P. Webb
Editor-in-Chief
On the cover
Big data
You have it, now use it
24
36
48
Competing
through data:
Three experts offer
their game plans
MIT professor Erik Brynjolfsson,
Cloudera cofounder Jeff Hammerbacher,
and Butler University mens basketball
coach Brad Stevens reflect on the power
of data.
Changing
companies minds
about women
60
Top executives
need feedback
heres how they
can get it
Robert S. Kaplan
As executives become more senior,
they are less likely to receive constructive
feedback on their performance or their
strategy. To get it, they should call on their
junior colleagues.
Feature
90
Special report
The second
economy
W. Brian Arthur
72
Oils uncertain
future
Picture This
100
The changing
shape of
US recessions
Byron Auguste, Susan Lund,
and James Manyika
84 Anticipating economic
headwinds
Jonathan Ablett, Lowell Bryan,
and Sven Smit
Departments
7 McKinsey on
the Web
Highlights from
our digital offerings
8 Idea Exchange
Readers mix it up
with authors of articles
from McKinsey Quarterly
2011 Number 3
Leading Edge
10 Cybersecurity: A senior
Applied Insight
executives guide
of big data
A changing corporate-technology
landscape and more aggressive
hackers make safeguarding valuable
corporate data a top-management
issue, not just an IT problem.
biggest baker
Grupo Bimbo CEO Daniel Servitje
ref lects on his companys growth
in developed and emerging markets.
Executive perspective
AstraZenecas big data
partnership
Mark Lelinski, an executive at the
global drugmaker, explains
how the company is using data to
build customer relationships
that focus on the total cost of care.
for selling
Olivia Nottebohm, Tom Stephenson,
and Jennifer Wickland
Most sales reps spend less than half
of their time actually selling. By
reshaping sales operations, companies
can help them focus on their real job.
economic impact
Eric Hazan, James Manyika, and
Matthieu Pelissie du Rausas
New McKinsey research underscores the
magnitude of the Nets impact on
global growth and corporate performance.
Editorial
Business
Board of Editors
Allan R. Gold
Bill Javetski
Allen P. Webb, Editor-in-Chief
Senior Editors
Frank Comes
Thomas Fleming
Lars Fyen
Josselyn Simpson
Dennis Swinford
Digital Media
Nicole Adams
Devin A. Brown
Jim Santo
Web Sites
mckinseyquarterly.com
china.mckinseyquarterly.com
Associate Editors
Luke Collins
Mary Reddy, Information Design
Now available on
mckinseyquarterly.com
Other features:
Measuring the value of search
Idea Exchange
Readers mix it up with authors of articles from McKinsey Quarterly
2011 Number 3
Cross-functional challenges
Jo Moffatt
Managing director, Woodreed, United Kingdom
The trouble with internal engagementwhich wasnt mentioned, even
though brands help develop employees who can ensure a consistent consumer
experienceis that HR and marketing tend to work in silos. They
should harness each others strengths, fusing HRs people knowledge with
marketings brand and customer expertise.
McKinseys Paul Magill responds:
The HRmarketing disconnect is a tragedy at many companies, since the brand is central
to both, but we are seeing several create pervasive strategies that bridge the internal
external divide through planned and unplanned customer interactions. Planned interactions help identify top-priority touch points, and we increasingly see marketing
working with HR to find frontline employees who arent always marketers but can still
deliver a better customer experience. Unplanned interactions lead to the employee
branding efforts you describe. A great example is when the two functions design, build,
and deploy the brand internally, while marketing embeds the execution in HR. Here, the
marketing function takes the kind of organization-wide, multistakeholder view of engagement we recommend, then divides up responsibility for executing the strategy.
Thinking small
Cy Heidari
President and CEO, ValueTelligence, New York, New York
While the approach is sensible for large-capitalization companies, it
may not apply to small- and midcapitalization companies due to the added
operational costs, even if they outsource their marketing activities.
McKinseys Laura LaBerge responds:
Youre right to recognize the compressed challenge this environment presents to smaller
companies, yet these firms also have unique opportunities. With less hierarchy to
stifle cross-functional coordination, its easier for employees at smaller companies to
wear several hats and embed marketing thinking across the organization. Its also
easier for employees to share experiences with customers, gain clearer insights, and
create a shared view of customer-engagement requirements. The need to prioritize
more means these companies pick their battlegrounds carefully and leverage close
customer relationships to better focus their efforts.
Suzanne Heywood
Principal, McKinsey & Company, London
In our experience, companies need to first determinebased on their sector,
strategy, and growth historywhether they have an ingoing bias for or
against centralization. Companies should then weigh the potential benefits
and drawbacks that might arise from it. With a bias against centralization,
some functional activities will still need to be centralized, but the benefits
would have to outweigh the risks substantially; the opposite would be true
if the bias were for centralization.
Second, its important to recognize that centralization may yield improvementssuch as enhancing knowledge sharing or minimizing operating
riskthat are difficult to quantify in terms of a market-capitalization benchmark. Finally, if companies do decide to centralize a function, they should
also consider alternatives to structural change. In many cases, making softer
changes (for example, standardizing processes, creating functional
networks to bring people together) can also result in centralization-related
benefits. It is wise to consider these mechanisms first and only implement
structural change if they will clearly not be effective.
Andrew Campbell responds:
You are right that benefits and drawbacks vary by business model and that many
are qualitative. But its because so much of this assessment is qualitative
that companies need to use a quantitative hurdle (such as the 10 percent marketcapitalization rule) and be confident in the potential gains from centralization
before assuming the risks. In my experience, qualitative assessments are too easily
unbalanced by subjective arguments, so there is real value in the quantitative
nature of question two.
With the softer changes, such as standardizing processes or bringing people
together, its implied that these actions are not centralization and do not need to
be judged against the same criteria. However, these actions do involve some
degree of centralization. Who decides what the standard process should look like?
Who decides whom to bring together, how often, and when? We should still
bear in mind the three centralization questions and the hurdles this decision should
cross when implementing less structural changes.
10
2011 Number 4
Leading Edge
10
13
Cybersecurity:
A senior
executives guide
A new era
for commodities
16
18
A quick
chat with the
worlds biggest
baker
Sizing
the Internets
economic
impact
Cybersecurity: A senior
executives guide
James Kaplan, Shantnu Sharma, and Allen Weinberg
A changing corporate-technology landscape and more aggressive hackers make safeguarding
valuable corporate data a top-management issue, not just an IT problem.
11
12
2011 Number 4
Leading Edge
13
A new era
for commodities
Richard Dobbs, Jeremy Oppenheim, and Fraser Thompson
Cheap resources underpinned economic growth for much of the 20th century.
The 21st will be different.
14
2011 Number 4
Q4 2011
MGI commodities
Exhibit 1 of 1
World War I
220
200
180
World War II
160
140
120
100
80
Postwar
depression
Great
Depression
60
0
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010 20112
1 Based on arithmetic average of 4 commodity indexes: food, agricultural raw materials, metals, and energy. Each index was
weighted by total world export volumes from 1999 to 2001 at indexed prices (in real terms) over same time period. Energy index
excludes gas prices prior to 1922, for which data are unavailable.
Source: FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations); Grilli and Yang commodity price index, 1988;
International Monetary Fund (IMF) primary commodity prices; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; Stephan
Pfaffenzeller et al., A short note on updating the Grilli and Yang commodity price index, World Bank Economic Review,
2007, Volume 21, Number 1, pp. 15163; World Bank commodity price data; UN Comtrade; McKinsey Global Institute analysis
Leading Edge
15
16
2011 Number 4
A quick
chat with the
worlds
biggest baker
Grupo Bimbo CEO Daniel Servitje reflects
on his companys growth in developed and
emerging markets.
Leading Edge
Daniel Servitje
CEO of Grupo Bimbo
17
18
2011 Number 4
New McKinsey research underscores the magnitude of the Nets impact on global growth
and corporate performance.
Leading Edge
19
medium-sized enterprises
we conducted in 12 countries.
Finally, our study also shows that
Internet maturitymeasured
by a variety of factors characterizing
a countrys Internet use, infrastructure, online expenditures, and
Exhibit 1 of 2
Internets contribution to
global GDP growth, %
Nominal GDP growth,1
19952009, %
Mature
countries
15
Sweden
14
Germany
South Korea
Italy
N/A2
3
3
China
Russia
2
2
1
1
10
3.9
1.9
4.7
3.4
7.0
4.7
3.4
4.6
0.3
4
5
India
15
12
Canada
18
16
United States
Brazil
23
10
France
High-growth
countries
24
11
United Kingdom
Japan
33
13.1
9.5
10.7
26.7
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development national accounts; McKinsey Global Institute analysis
20
2011 Number 4
Q4 2011
Internet growth
Exhibit 2 of 2
Export revenues as
% of total sales
2.5
7.4
2.7
13.0
5.3
1 Based on number of technologies possessed by companies and number of employees, customers, and suppliers with access
to those technologies.
Source: May 2011 McKinsey survey of >4,800 small and medium-sized enterprises in 12 countries; McKinsey Global
Institute analysis
e-commercecorrelates with
standard-of-living improvements,
measured in terms of GDP per
capita. We also found higher growth
rates for labor productivity in
nations such as the United States,
where Internet usage and infrastructure were more mature, and
a correlation between highly
developed Internet ecosystems and
higher GDP growth rates.
. . . and for companies
Our global research on small and
medium-sized enterprises also
indicates that companies with two
characteristicsemploying larger
numbers of Internet technologies
(such as blogs, social networks,
and e-commerce sites) and
enjoying high rates of adoption
among employees, customers, and
suppliersrecorded revenue
growth of 13 percent over the last
Leading Edge
21
22
Big data
You have it, now use it.
With data flooding into your company
as never before, information is no
longer just an IT issue; its yours as a
senior leader. Maybe your company
is sitting on powerful data assets that
could strengthen its ability to compete,
or perhaps theres a competitor thats
suddenly aiming a big data strategy
right at you. In our first story, find out
why mastering data and analytics is now
mission critical, and ask yourself five
questions that will help you understand
looming competitive challenges. Then
turn to a leading academic expert, a
data entrepreneur, and a top college
basketball coach who zero in on how you
can use data to compete.
24
Are you ready for the
era of big data?
Brad Brown, Michael Chui,
and James Manyika
36
Competing through
data: Three experts offer
their game plans
23
24
25
But over the last few years, the volume of data has exploded. In 15 of
the US economys 17 sectors, companies with more than 1,000
employees store, on average, over 235 terabytes of datamore data
than is contained in the US Library of Congress. Reams of data
still flow from financial transactions and customer interactions but
also cascade in at unparalleled rates from new devices and multiple
points along the value chain. Just think about what could be happening at your own company right now: sensors embedded in process
machinery may be collecting operations data, while marketers scan
social media or use location data from smartphones to understand teens
buying quirks. Data exchanges may be networking your supply
chain partners, and employees could be swapping best practices on
corporate wikis.
All of this new information is laden with implications for leaders and
their enterprises.1 Emerging academic research suggests that companies that use data and business analytics to guide decision making
are more productive and experience higher returns on equity than
competitors that dont.2 Thats consistent with research weve conducted
showing that networked organizations can gain an edge by opening
information conduits internally and by engaging customers and suppliers strategically through Web-based exchanges of information.3
Over time, we believe big data may well become a new type of corporate
asset that will cut across business units and function much as a
powerful brand does, representing a key basis for competition. If thats
right, companies need to start thinking in earnest about whether
they are organized to exploit big datas potential and to manage the
threats it can pose. Success will demand not only new skills but also
new perspectives on how the era of big data could evolvethe widening
circle of management practices it may affect and the foundation it
represents for new, potentially disruptive business models.
1 For more, see the McKinsey Global Institute report Big data: The next frontier
26
2011 Number 4
27
28
2011 Number 4
Parsing the
benefits: Not all
industries are created
equal
Even as big data changes the
game for virtually every sector, it
also tilts the playing field, favoring
some companies and industries,
particularly in the early stages of
adoption. To understand those
dynamics, we examined 20 sectors
in the US economy, sized their
contributions to GDP, and developed two indexes that estimate
each sectors potential for value
creation using big data, as well
as the ease of capturing that value.1
As the accompanying sector map
shows (exhibit), financial players
get the highest marks for value creation opportunities. Many of these
companies have invested deeply in
IT and have large data pools to
exploit. Information industries, not
surprisingly, are also in this league.
They are data intensive by nature,
and they use that data innovatively
to compete by adopting sophisticated analytic techniques.
The public sector is the most fertile
terrain for change. Governments
collect huge amounts of data, transact business with millions of
citizens, and, more often than not,
suffer from highly variable perform-
29
Exhibit 1 of 1
Example: US economy
High
Utilities
Natural resources
Manufacturing
Finance and
insurance
Transportation and warehousing
Real estate
Management of companies
Professional services
Accommodation and food
Construction
Administrative
services
Other services
Low
Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Educational
services
Arts and
entertainment
Government
High
1 For detailed explication of metrics, see appendix in McKinsey Global Institute full report Big data: The next frontier for
30
2011 Number 4
sands of components. More integrated data platforms now allow companies and their supply chain partners to collaborate during the
design phasea crucial determinant of final manufacturing costs.
31
Are we using our people data to create value? mckinseyquarterly.com, March 2011.
32
2011 Number 4
33
Confronting complications
Up to this point, we have emphasized the strategic opportunities big
data presents, but leaders must also consider a set of complications.
Talent is one of them. In the United States alone, our research shows,
the demand for people with the deep analytical skills in big data
(including machine learning and advanced statistical analysis) could
outstrip current projections of supply by 50 to 60 percent. By 2018,
as many as 140,000 to 190,000 additional specialists may be required.
34
2011 Number 4
35
implications. In health care, government services, retailing, and manufacturing, our research suggests, big data could improve productivity
by 0.5 to 1 percent annually. In these sectors globally, it could produce
hundreds of billions of dollars and euros in new value.
In fact, big data may ultimately be a key factor in how nations, not just
companies, compete and prosper. Certainly, these techniques offer
glimmers of hope to a global economy struggling to find a path toward
more rapid growth. Through investments and forward-looking policies, company leaders and their counterparts in government can capitalize on big data instead of being blindsided by it.
36
Competing through
data: Three experts offer
their game plans
Erik Brynjolfsson
Professor of management
Institute of Technologys
Jeff Hammerbacher
frame of mind.
Brad Stevens
basketball coach
37
The professor
Erik Brynjolfsson
Steve Dunwell
38
2011 Number 4
Our research has found a shift from using intuition toward using data
and analytics in making decisions. This change has been accompanied
by measurable improvement in productivity and other performance
measures. Specifically, a one-standard-deviation increase toward data
and analytics was correlated with about a 5 to 6 percent improvement
in productivity and a slightly larger increase in profitability in those same
firms. The implication for companies is that by changing the way
they make decisions, theyre likely to be able to outperform competitors.
39
One CEO told me that when he pushed this attitude, he had to change
over 50 percent of his senior-management team because they just
didnt get it. Obviously, that was a painful thing to have to do. But the
results have been very successful. And they require that level of
aggressiveness by top management, if it really wants to end up in that
group of leaders as opposed to the laggards.
Required skills
Having enough data to get a statistically significant result is not a problem. Theres plenty of data. So the skills often have more to do with
sampling methodologies, designing experiments, and working these
very, very large data sets without becoming overwhelmed. If you look
inside companies, you also see a transformation in the functions that
are using data. CIOs are discovering that, more and more, its the
marketing people and the people working with customerscustomer
relationship managementwho have the biggest data needs. These
are the people CIOs are working with most closely. This is part of a
broader revolution as we move from just financial numerical data
toward all sorts of nonfinancial metrics.
Often, the nonfinancial metrics give a quicker and more accurate
measure of whats happening in the business. I was talking to Gary
Lovemanthe CEO of Caesars Entertainment, formerly Harrahs,
and a PhD graduate of MIT. Hes used some of these techniques to
revolutionize whats happening in that industry. But, interestingly,
increasingly what he measures is customer satisfaction and a lot of
other intermediate metrics. He said that customer satisfaction metrics were much quicker and more precise metrics of what was happening
in response to some of the policy changes that he put in place.
Think of it this way. If customers end up satisfied or dissatisfied, that
will affect the probability of their coming back next year. Now, next
years financial results will be affected as a result. And you could, in
principle, try to match up the experience the customer had this
year with future years return rates. But a much quicker way of getting
feedback on which processes are working is to look at customer
satisfaction when you put process changes in place.
40
2011 Number 4
nano data, in the sense that we have very, very fine-grained dataan
ability to measure things much more precisely than in the past. You
can learn about the preferences of an individual customer and personalize your offerings for that particular customer.
One of the biggest revolutions has involved enterprise information
systems, like ERP, enterprise resource planning; CRM, customer
relationship management; or SCM, supply chain managementthose
large enterprise systems that companies have spent hundreds of
millions of dollars on. You can use the data from them not just to manage
operations but to gain business intelligence and learn how they could
be managed differently. A common pattern that were seeing is that three
to five years after installing one of these big enterprise systems, companies start saying, Hey, we need some business intelligence tools to
take advantage of all this data. Its up to managers now to seize that
opportunity and take advantage of this very fine-grained data that just
didnt exist previously.
41
The data
entrepreneur
Jeff Hammerbacher
Before cofounding Silicon Valley
software start-up Cloudera in 2009, at the
age of 26, Jeff Hammerbacher was a
quantitative analyst on Wall Street and one
of Facebooks first employees.
42
2011 Number 4
Data leaders
When we started Cloudera, we didnt have a core thesis around where
the technology would be adopted or what the market was going to
look like. Early adopters were clearly in the Web and digital-media
spaces. But in terms of traditional industries, the federal government surprised me. They really are the leaders in multimedia data
analysisworking with text, images, video. In the intelligence
agencies, Ive seen more sophistication than in commercial domains.
I was also surprised to see the retail space. Retailers had very large
volumes of data, and because many were branching out into e-commerce,
they had a lot of Web logs and Web data as well. There is an arms race
going on right now in retail. If you can understand consumer behavior
and get your hands around as much behavioral data as possible to
better guide product decision making, then every penny you can eke
out is increasing your margins and allowing you to invest more.
Financial services was one sector that I had hoped would be an early
adopter, but these companies tend not to look at their businesses as a
whole in the same way that retail does. Data management is thought
of as project specific, even to the point where individual trading desks
could have their own chief technology officers. Our technology tends
to work best as a shared infrastructure for multiple lines of business.
Where this is headed is learning how to point this new infrastructure
for storing and analyzing data at real business problems, as well
as growing the imagination of businesspeople about what they can do
when a variety of experts analyze the data. If you can digitize reality,
then you can move your world faster than before.
43
44
2011 Number 4
Courtesy of Butler
University
The coach
Brad Stevens
Brad Stevens is head coach of the Butler
University mens basketball team.
45
glos.asp.
46
2011 Number 4
The Quarterly: Can you say more about how you simplify data,
how you engage your players?
Brad Stevens: Youve got to figure out how they react, how they best
comprehend, how they best learn in a team setting, how they best
learn in an individual setting, and go from there. Each teams different,
each players different. And, you know, it may mean bringing in a guy
who has a mind for numbers and saying, The bottom line is that, right
now, youre shooting 43 percent. Youre a better shooter than that. If
47
The Quarterly: Was there one game or a couple of games where this
really played out and made a difference?
Brad Stevens: Every game we play in. Theres not a game when
this wouldnt have played a major role. Were not the most talented,
so we have to be good in these little areas. Sometimes, you know, the
numbers hurt you. You believe one thing, and then the other team has
a night thats unique. But more times than not, the score takes care
of itself, as Bill Walsh6 says.
6 Bill Walsh coached the US National Football Leagues San Francisco 49ers to three Super
Bowl titles (1982, 1985, and 1989). His book The Score Takes Care of Itself: My Philosophy of
Leadership (Portfolio, August 2009), published two years after his death, was coauthored
with his son, Craig, and with Steve Jamison.
Changing
companies minds
about women
Joanna Barsh and Lareina Yee
The problem
Your company has trouble retaining
promising women or promoting them
into top jobs. Structural changes,
such as flextime, arent helping enough;
they do little to address the invisible
but powerful beliefs, held by many managers, that subtly, and unintentionally,
hamper womens careers.
What to do about it
There are no sure answers yet. But
the experience of companies making
progress suggests that injecting greater
rigor into people processesmore
data, thoughtful targets that push
women into the consideration set for
key roles, a company-specific business
case for women, better sponsorship
approachescan make a difference.
Why it matters
A bevy of research highlights strong
statistical correlations among large numbers of senior women, financial performance, and organizational health. The
bottom line: companies gain hard
business benefits from a more diverse
senior team.
49
50
2011 Number 4
Despite significant corporate commitment to the advancement of womens careers, progress appears to have stalled. The
percentage of women on boards and senior-executive teams remains
stuck at around 15 percent in many countries, and just 3 percent
of Fortune 500 CEOs are women.
The last generation of workplace innovationspolicies to support
women with young children, networks to help women navigate
their careers, formal sponsorship programs to ensure professional
developmentbroke down structural barriers holding women back.
The next frontier is toppling invisible barriers: mind-sets widely held
by managers, men and women alike, that are rarely acknowledged
but block the way.
When senior leaders commit themselves to gender diversity, they really
mean itbut in the heat of the moment, deeply entrenched beliefs
cause old forms of behavior to resurface. All too often in our experience,
executives perceive women as a greater risk for senior positions, fail
to give women tough feedback that would help them grow, or hesitate
to offer working mothers opportunities that come with more travel
and stress. Not surprisingly, a survey we conducted earlier this year indicated that although a majority of women who make it to senior roles
have a real desire to lead, few think they have meaningful support to
do so, and even fewer think theyre in line to move up.
Our ideas for breaking this cycle are directional, not definitive. They
rest on our experience in the trenches with senior executives, on
discussions with 30 diversity experts, and on the reflections of leaders
weve interviewed at companies that have been on this journey for
years. These companies include Pitney Bowes, 38 percent of whose vice
presidents are women; Shell, where more than a quarter of all
supervisors and professional staff worldwide are women; and Time
Warner, where more than 40 percent of the senior executives in its
operating divisions are women and where the share of women in senior
roles has jumped 30 percent in the past six years. Great progress,
but even these three companies are the first to admit how much further
they have to go.
Their collective experience suggests to us that real progress requires
systemwide change driven by a hard-edged approach, including targets
ensuring that women are at least considered for advancement, the
rigorous application of data in performance dialogues to overcome prob-
51
in the US economy. Read an executive summary or download the full report on the
McKinsey & Company Web site.
2 The full report, Women at the top of corporations: Making it happen, part of McKinsey
& Companys Women Matter 2010 series, is available on the McKinsey & Company
Web site. The differences among countries reflect significant variance in their starting
points and cultural normswhich, for example, can make it difficult for a woman to
outearn her husband.
3 Part of the reason is that almost twice as many executive-level women as men (60 percent
versus 35 percent) occupy staff roles that are less likely to lead to the top job.
52
2011 Number 4
would face, and she often doesnt receive the coaching a man would to
help her assimilate into the companys culture.
I dont want to tell Bob he didnt get that job. Theres a limited pool
of senior positions, and leaders are not comfortable telling protgs
they have groomed for years that someone else is getting the spot.
I dont know how to talk to or mentor her. Men tend to sponsor other
men, find it harder to build relationships with people when they share
fewer common interests, and sometimes are nervous about forging
a close relationship that could seem inappropriate.
If I put a woman in that role and she fails, itll set back all women.
Mind-sets like this one inadvertently treat men as individuals and
women as representative of their whole gender.
A woman isnt right for that role. Long-held stereotypes about the
relative strengths of men and women survive, at least in vestigial form.
In the face of these silent but potent forces, its little wonder the careers
of many promising women die on the vine. Slowly but surelydespite
the best intentions of HR departments and individual executivesthe
experience of women starts to diverge from that of their male peers:
Less opportunity for professional growth. Unintended performance bias
and softer feedback. Fewer sponsors offering fewer opportunities and
less advocacy. Lowered ambition. Greater satisfaction with staying put.
Attrition and a fresh start at a different company.4
A word about the role women play in this vicious cycle: they start out
ambitious. Most young women, like young men, hope to move to the next
level, and women who reach more senior levels retain that ambition
(exhibit). That said, women also turn down advancement opportunities
for varied reasons, ranging from commitments outside work to risk
aversion for positions that demand new skills to a desire to stay put in
roles that provide personal meaning. In addition, mothers with more
than one child are much more satisfied with staying put, our survey
shows, though they remain highly confident about their performance
and abilities.
Subtle changes in these attitudes toward advancement are another
powerful benefit of changing how companies think about women
4Our data show that like the men we surveyed, most women who leave a job move to another
Q4 2011
Mind-sets
Exhibit 1 of 1
53
Like their male counterparts, most young women want to move up.
Many of those who advance retain that ambition.
Desire to move to the next level, % who agree or strongly agree
Young
men
Young
women
98
92
Aged 2434
79
83
In early stage
of career1
In early to middle
management
Source: Feb 2011 McKinsey survey of 1,000 women and 525 men currently working in large corporations or professionalservices firms; McKinsey analysis
54
2011 Number 4
Make it personal
Make no mistake: as a senior executive, you are already inf luencing
your companys approach. If youre not paying much attention to
the issue of womens advancement, youre ensuring that things wont
change. As Shells executive vice president of global supply and
distribution, Peggy Montana, says, When you look at corporate mindsets, change starts at the top. I havent seen change in diversity start
from middle management.
And if youre personally committed, you can catalyze change that will
improve not only your companys treatment of women but also, in
all likelihood, its business results. 5 In the early 1980s, Pitney Bowes
CEO George Harvey learned that the most productive newly hired
salespeople were women, many of whom had previously been schoolteachers. Curious to know the explanation, he visited sales offices
late in the day and discovered women writing personal notes to their
customers with a lot of convictiona practice that, further inquiry
revealed, seemed to be driving sales.
According to Pitney Bowes executive vice president Johnna Torsone,
Harveys recognition of the value of these committed women touched
off a wave of change. Torsone says Harvey became determined to
open up an environment that allowed people to come in who hadnt had
a true opportunity on a level playing field. They would be motivated,
he reasoned, and their success would increase the competitive environment for the men and for everybody else in the organization. The
end result, Torsone explains, was an HR strategy based on business.
5For evidence of the strong correlation between women at the top and stronger financial
55
Mogelof, and Caroline Webb, How centered leaders achieve extraordinary results,
mckinseyquarterly.com, October 2008; and Carolyn B. Aiken and Scott P. Keller, The CEOs
role in leading transformation, mckinseyquarterly.com, February 2007.
56
2011 Number 4
Pitney Bowes, for example, focused on the front end. For a number of
years, every list of candidates for promotion there had to include 35 percent women and 15 percent minorities, equal to their representation
in the workforce at the time. Harvey chose this approach because he
felt that white men had been disproportionately advantaged and had
gotten complacent, Torsone explains.
Shell focused on outcomes, setting a long-term target for women at the
top: currently, 20 percent of the companys senior executives worldwide. So far, women hold just over 15 percent of those positions, up from
10 percent in 2005. The company includes an assessment of progress
against this target in all senior executives reviews and presents the overall results in its annual report.
At Time Warner, chief diversity officer Lisa Quiroz explains that each
division is required to have a succession plan and a robust promotion slate for its top layers of management. The CEO and the HR chief
review the plans and slates every year for diversity, among other criteria. This review also includes specific discussions about how individual
women are being prepared for their next role, including rotation
among the companys divisions and between staff and line roles. For
more than a decade, a noticeable part of each divisional CEOs bonus
has depended on meeting the companys expectations for diversity.
Will men raise concerns? Maybe. They did early on at Pitney Bowes,
despite support for diversity from the top. George [Harvey], Torsone
explains, brought challenge and passion to the focus, but it felt alienating to the men. That was not the intention, and so it had to evolve.
When I came in, we broadened our efforts to upgrade talent development, making it better for everyone. We still see resistance from men
occasionally, but the overall culture changed, and those attitudes are
really disappearing.
57
And what about women? Shells Montana says her response to fears from
women that theyre getting jobs just because of their gender is, Get
over it. Ive never seen a selection panel pick somebody on the basis of,
Shes not really qualified, but we need a female in this job. It just
doesnt happen. Were running a business, and were not taking undue
risks. Its never going to be a risk-free exercise. But neither is it for
the rest of the population.
58
2011 Number 4
and able to excel. The results flag outliers: parts of the organization
where everyone can thrive and those areas where some or all employees
feel stymied (those are addressed by specific follow-up plans). Over
the years, Shell has seen the gap between mens and womens experiences
shrinka positive trend. Theres still the question of whether genderbased attitudes influence responses to surveys like these. In our experience and in Shells, though, they are much better than nothing.
59
do, who youre exposed to, what development programs you go to, who
you have lunch with, whether youre getting feedback or being assigned
a coach. At her company, leaders work hard to make womens careers
intentional. One key: making sure that sponsorees attend Time Warner
womens leadership programs, where participants interact with top
management and learn to overcome their own limiting mind-sets and
behavior. So far, among the more than 300 leaders who have attended
Time Warners program for senior women, 22 percent have been promoted, compared with only 11.8 percent of all women at a similar level
in the company.
61
What to do about it
Cultivate a network of junior coaches
who are willing to tell you the things you
dont want to hear. And seek input on key
strategic decisions by empowering junior
colleagues to look at your business with
a clean sheet of paper.
62
2011 Number 4
At this stage in your career, most (if not all) of your colleagues are
probably subordinates. While you may be overseen by a board of directors or a very senior boss, your superiors probably no longer closely
observe your daily behavior. Instead, they now form their opinions of
you based on your presentations in relatively formal settings or on
secondhand reports from your subordinates.
As a result of this, many executives find that as they become more senior,
they receive less coaching and become more confused about their
performance and developmental needs. They may also become increasingly isolated from constructive criticismsubordinates do not want
to offend the boss and may believe that constructive suggestions are
unwelcome and unwise. Many senior executives also unwittingly
send off a vibe that while they claim to encourage constructive criticism, they really dont want to hear it. At this stage of their careers,
they may not have focused sufficiently on developing mutually trusting
subordinate relationships that would make getting feedback and
advice a lot easier.
Too frequently, when these executives ultimately do receive feedback
in their year-end reviews (often as part of a 360-degree-feedback
program), they are surprised to be confronted with specific criticisms
of their leadership style, communication approach, and interpersonal skills. Worse, they may also hear broad concerns raised about
their strategy, key tactical decisions, and operating priorities for
the business. These leaders may even learn, often too late, that the
various criticisms and concerns have been widely discussed among
their subordinates for an extended period of time without them
being aware.
I have certainly experienced and observed this phenomenon over the
past 25 years in my own executive career and also in working with
numerous executives since coming to Harvard Business School. I have
seen the tendency for senior executives to become more isolated from
63
64
2011 Number 4
65
result, his senior leaders seldom had the opportunity to debate and
discuss issues with each other (unless they initiated meetings on their
own). This made it difficult for the group to agree on which drugs
to develop or to decide how best to develop them.
While the CEO was widely perceived as a brilliant strategist and creative
thinker, he was not yet seen as an effective manager and leader. Much
of this was surprising to the executive, who said he hadnt previously
heard these observations from any of his mentors or bosses.
He began to act immediately on a number of the criticisms. In particular,
he arranged to reach out to each of his direct reports on a regular
basis for specific advice (and encouraged them to do the same with their
direct reports). He also established monthly leadership team dinners
where the senior-executive group could candidly discuss and debate
key issues.
After three months, the CEO was able to break the group stalemate on
several important issues, including getting agreement on two new
drug targets and specific approaches to developing each drug. During
this time, the CEO had led several sessions where the members of
the group wrestled with these tough questions and, importantly, came
to better understand each other, as well as the CEOs vision for the
business. Through open debate and discussion, the team members developed a greater respect for the challenges that each of them faced in
their individual areas of responsibility. As a result, they began operating
as a more cohesive unit.
In the course of these steps, the CEO also focused diligently on
strengthening his own soft relationship-building skills, including self-
66
2011 Number 4
67
Above all, this CEO learned that asking for advice and coaching was a
sign of strength rather than weakness. Using these techniques,
he now found that he could rely more heavily on his subordinates for
advice and as an early-warning system for his own performance.
Furthermore, as he and his senior managers began to understand and
trust one another, many shared with him their own career aspirations and concerns. Indeed, this had the impact of stabilizing his seniorleadership group, helping the CEO retain members of the team and
generally improving morale. As a result of all these efforts, he now
reported feeling far less alone and isolated. While he regretted not
having taken this approach sooner, he was optimistic that he was now
on the right track.
68
2011 Number 4
Cultivate junior
coaches
Practice
self-disclosure
69
Improve your
ability to frame
and discuss
key questions
Assess your
business with
a clean
sheet of paper
70
2011 Number 4
71
exercise created an opportunity to challenge up-and-coming executives and see them in action, while providing participants with a highly
motivating learning experience.
This approach builds on efforts to create an upward coaching environment for senior leaders. It allows you to get coaching that is grounded
in the strategic needs of the business and is also an excellent way to take
a fresh look at your company. It reinforces the need for leaders to
have the courage to frame the right questions and ask for help from their
people. This type of approach, combined with strong individual
coaching processes, can help build a powerful competitive advantage
for your organization.
The approaches in this article are intended to help you take greater
ownership of getting feedback and should complement the 360-degree
feedback process or board review processes that your company
already uses. While 360-degree feedback is very valuable, it typically
occurs at the end of a year and therefore often lags in highlighting
key issues. In a fast-changing world, you need a more active approach
for getting coaching and real-time advice. Some of the activities
suggested in this article (see sidebar, Four ways to get better feedback)
may feel awkward at first. But I would encourage you to overcome
some initial discomfort in order to take greater ownership of getting
feedback. By developing this mind-set, you will improve your
ability to ask the right questions, as well as dramatically upgrade your
effectiveness and the performance of your organization.
72
Special report
Oils uncertain
future
What you need to know
Over the past six months, oil prices
have dropped sharply, amid concerns
about a double-dip recession, and
approached $120 a barrel as supply
disruptions in Libya roiled global
markets. Hang onto your hats because
we may just be getting started. Read
in this package about long-term
supply-and-demand trends that could,
if not mitigated through coordinated
global action, cause a price shock.
Then explore the strategic implications
of high, volatile oil prices and the
actions some supply chain leaders are
already taking to prepare.
74
Another oil shock?
Tom Janssens, Scott Nyquist,
and Occo Roelofsen
78
The automotive
sectors road to greater
fuel efficiency
Russell Hensley and
Andreas Zielke
84
Anticipating economic
headwinds
Jonathan Ablett, Lowell
Bryan, and Sven Smit
87
Building a supply
chain that can withstand
high oil prices
Knut Alicke and Tobias
Meyer
73
74
Its been a while since the world has been truly preoccupied with
the threat of sustained high oil prices. The global economic recovery has
been muted, and a double-dip recession remains possible.
But that dour prospect shouldnt make executives sanguine about the
risk of another oil shock. Emerging markets are still in the midst of a
historic transition toward greater energy consumption. When global
economic performance becomes more robust, oil demand is likely to
grow faster than supply capacity can. As that happens, at some point
before too long supply and demand could collidegently or ferociously.
The case for the benign scenario rests on a steady evolution away from
oil consumption in areas such as transportation, chemical production,
power, and home heating. Moves by many major economies to impose
tougher automotive fuel efficiency standards are a step in this direction.
However, fully achieving the needed transition will take more stringent regulation, such as the abolition of fuel subsidies in oil-producing
countries, Asia, and elsewhere, as well as widespread consumer behavior changes. And historically, governments, companies, and consumers
have been disinclined to tackle tough policy choices or make big
changes until their backs are against the wall.
This inertia suggests another scenarioone thats sufficiently plausible
and underappreciated that we think its worth exploring: the prospect that within this decade, the world could experience a period of
significant volatility, with oil prices leaping upward and oscillating
75
between $125 and $175 a barrel (or higher) for some time. The resulting
economic pain would be significant. Economic modeling by our colleagues suggests that by 2020, global GDP would be about $1.5 trillion
smaller than expected, if oil prices spiked and stayed high for several years.
But like any difficult transition, this one also would create major
opportunitiesfor consumers of energy to differentiate their cost structures from competitors that arent prepared and for a host of energy
innovators to create substitutes for oil and tap into new sources of supply.
Furthermore, if we endured a period of high and volatile prices that
lasted for two or three years, by 2020 or so oil could face real competition
from other energy sources.
To paint a clearer picture for senior executives of what such a world would
mean for themand how to prepare nowwe asked several colleagues
to join us in a thought experiment about the impact of a prolonged oil
price spike. Russell Hensley and Andreas Zielke, from McKinseys
automotive practice, explain how intensified regulation already is leading
a transition toward greater fuel economy, as well as the potential for
higher oil prices to reinforce that momentum. Jonathan Ablett, Lowell
Bryan, and Sven Smit, from McKinseys strategy practice, assess the
global economic impact of an oil price spike and the strategic implications
of a slower-growth environment. Finally, Knut Alicke and Tobias
Meyer, from McKinseys operations practice, describe energy-efficient
supply chain strategies that some companies are already undertaking.
A delicate balance
The world is very far from running out of oil. By most estimates, at
least a trillion barrels of conventional oil still reside beneath the earths
surface, not to mention several trillion more barrels of oil or gas that
could be extracted through unconventional sources, such as oil sands.
More relevant for prices, though, is how much spare oil production
capacity exists in the world. Three million or four million barrels a day
typically represents a comfortable buffer when the global economy
is healthy. If that buffer shrinks, and markets expect strong demand
growth to continue, prices can risesometimes dramatically. Thats
what happened prior to the 200809 financial crisis as surging emergingmarket demand strained production capacity and prices approached
$150 a barrel. This fly-up was short lived because the ensuing deep reces-
76
2011 Number 4
Could supply growth accelerate to keep pace? Many industry analysts and our own supply model suggest that it wont be easy. Despite
high oil prices for much of the past decade and surging investment
outlays by many major private and national oil companies alike, capacity
has risen by only slightly more than 1 percent a year during that
time. The logistics, supply systems, and political alignment needed to
extract new oil supplies make that a complex, expensive, and timeconsuming business. And coaxing more output out of existing oil fields,
which typically have high production-decline rates, also is costly
and challenging.
Our current projections suggest that in a business as usual scenario,2
the world could reach a realistic supply capacity of around 100 million
barrels a day by 2020, up from 91 million or 92 million today. That,
however, would barely suffice to meet the roughly 100 million barrels of
liquids the world would consume each day in such a scenario, up from
88 million or 89 million today.
1 For the sake of simplicity, in most of this article we use the term oil as short-hand for
liquids, which comprise all liquid fuels derived from crude oil, as well as liquid fuels from
natural-gas liquids (NGLs), biofuels, gas to liquids (GTLs), and coal to liquids (CTLs).
2 Our business-as-usual scenario assumes that between 2010 and 2020, the world economy
will grow at the rate currently anticipated by many analysts (3.0 to 3.5 percent) and that oil
prices wont significantly exceed $100 a barrel during this period.
77
78
2011 Number 4
does happen from time to time. The possibilities include an exceptionally severe hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico, violence in the Niger Delta,
instability in Venezuela, and further tension in the Middle East.
If this new price spike took place, it could have a more significant impact
on global consumption patterns than most executives expect. For
starters, it would hit global growth, which in turn would immediately
knock down oil demand. In addition, there would be some rapid behavioral effects, such as a reduction in car, air, and sea travel. If the spike
lasted longer, it could cause several more structural shifts, such as
prompting individuals to use different modes of transport or even to look
for work closer to home, encouraging companies to reverse offshoring
The automotive
sectors road to greater
fuel efficiency
Russell Hensley and Andreas Zielke
79
80
2011 Number 4
Q4 2011
Oil price spikes
Another oil shock?
Exhibit 1 of 1
81
20
Marine
Medium/heavy
Air traffic
Power
Chemicals Buildings
vehicles
17
11
Other industries
19
~8889
Business-as-usual scenario
22
2020
20
14
1719
1517
12.513.0
20
100
2.53.0
7.5
8.5
4.5 ~4.5
5.5
1719
~8090
Medium/
heavy vehicles
Light vehicles
Total reduction
of
3.05.0
mbd
Chemicals
Total reduction
of
1.01.5
mbd
mbd
Power
generation
1.01.5
mbd
mbd
3.05.0
Total reduction
of
0.51.5
mbd
Marine
Total reduction
of
Total reduction
of
Buildings
Air traffic
0.51.5
Total reduction
of
Total reduction
of
~0.5
mbd
Other
industries
Accelerating efforts to move away
from use of oil in power generation,
especially in the Middle East
Total reduction
of
1.03.0
mbd
1 All liquid fuels derived from crude oil, natural-gas liquids (NGLs), biofuels, gas to liquids (GTLs), and coal to liquids (CTLs).
82
2011 Number 4
83
84
Anticipating economic
headwinds
Jonathan Ablett, Lowell Bryan, and Sven Smit
colleagues in McKinseys strategy practice conducted using the firms global-growth model,
a tool for long-term scenario planning. The model links energy and capital markets to output
and highlights relationships between growth and structural factors such as urbanization,
education, and industry structure shifts. It can generate globally consistent scenarios for 20
countries, nine regions, and the world as a whole.
Q4 2011
Oil and growth sidebar
Exhibit 1 of 1
85
$125 a barrel
China
South
Africa
Germany,
India, Japan
France,
United Kingdom,
United States
50%
28%
~30%
~21%
0.6
0.6
0.4
1.0
0.6
1.0
$150 a barrel
0.9
1.5
86
2011 Number 4
4 For more on diversifying sources of financing, see Richard Dobbs, Susan Lund, and
Andreas Schreiner, How the growth of emerging markets will strain global finance,
mckinseyquarterly.com, December 2010.
87
We dont need to look very hard for a live case study of what happens to global supply chains when oil prices spike. Just three years ago,
when they shot up to $125 and beyond, it became painfully obvious to
many companies that their supply chains were not viable at those levels.
Research we conducted at that time indicated that even if oil prices were
as low as $40 a barrel, it would still make economic sense for companies to take a variety of actions that collectively would reduce the energy
intensity of global supply chains by almost one-fourth. Energy intensity
could be reduced by more than one-third if oil prices stayed above $100 a
barrel for a prolonged period (exhibit). The potential would be even
greater at higher prices.
Here are some of the opportunities that far-sighted companies are beginning to act on:
Utilizing space-saving packages. A retailer and a wholesaler partnered
delivery this year of its first new ultralarge ore carrier, with 400,000
deadweight tons of capacitymore than twice that of todays standard
vessel on the most important trade routesto ship iron ore from Brazil to
China. Scale is important because doubling the capacity of a transport
Q4 2011
Supply chain sidebar
88
Exhibit
1 of 1 2011 Number 4
Overall
potential fuel
savings = 38%
Reduce average
transportation distance
12
Assess usage of
collective assets
1 Assumes informed behavior by shippers, providers, investors, and government, over 10-year period; figures for first 3 levers are based
on fuel consumption after other 3 levers have been implemented. When used in combination, multiple levers do not yield the sum of
their individual potential, because each successive lever addresses an already reduced base.
2Value density is measure of products economic value against its weight or volume.
3Relative drag is energy needed for propulsion of a unit of given size at given speed; payload ratio is cargo-carrying capacity of transport
asset typically increases its energy efficiency by one-fourth. The same goes
for trucks too. In emerging markets, where average truck size is less than
half that in OECD1 countries, partly because of poorer infrastructure and
smaller retail outlets, every percentage point of average truck size would
reduce fuel consumption per unit of capacity by about 0.4 to 0.6 points.
Combining new technologies. Maersk, the Danish container liner, used
most of the available technological advances when it placed orders for its
new 400-meter-long vessels, each with space for 18,000 20-foot container
units. These vessels set a new benchmark in maritime energy efficiency
by virtue of their size, slower speed, design improvements, and a waste
heatrecovery system that reduces the engines fuel consumption.
Switching to alternative fuels. A road transport company recently esti-
mated that it would save 15,000 a year per truck by converting its small
fleet to run on vegetable oil rather than traditional diesel fuel. Because
of North Americas recent flood of supply of natural gas, companies could
also convert fleets to run on liquified natural gas (LNG) instead of diesel.
1 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
89
91
The second
economy
W. Brian Arthur
In 1850, a decade before the Civil War, the United States economy
was smallit wasnt much bigger than Italys. Forty years later, it was
the largest economy in the world. What happened in between was
the railroads. They linked the east of the country to the west, and the
interior to both. They gave access to the easts industrial goods;
they made possible economies of scale; they stimulated steel and
manufacturingand the economy was never the same.
Deep changes like this are not unusual. Every so oftenevery 60 years
or soa body of technology comes along and over several decades,
quietly, almost unnoticeably, transforms the economy: it brings new social
classes to the fore and creates a different world for business. Can such
a transformationdeep and slow and silentbe happening today?
92
2011 Number 4
93
theyd still be flashing all over the country for some time, perhaps talking
to the flight controllersstarting to say that the flights getting ready
for departure and to prepare for that.
Now consider a second example, from supply chain management.
Twenty years ago, if you were shipping freight through Rotterdam into
the center of Europe, people with clipboards would be registering
arrival, checking manifests, filling out paperwork, and telephoning forward destinations to let other people know. Now such shipments go
through an RFID2 portal where they are scanned, digitally captured,
and automatically dispatched. The RFID portal is in conversation
digitally with the originating shipper, other depots, other suppliers,
and destinations along the route, all keeping track, keeping control,
and reconfiguring routing if necessary to optimize things along the
way. What used to be done by humans is now executed as a series of
conversations among remotely located servers.
In both these examples, and all across economies in the developed world,
processes in the physical economy are being entered into the digital
economy, where they are speaking to other processes in the digital
economy, in a constant conversation among multiple servers and
multiple semi-intelligent nodes that are updating things, querying things,
checking things off, readjusting things, and eventually connecting
back with processes and humans in the physical economy.
So we can say that another economya second economyof all of
these digitized business processes conversing, executing, and triggering
further actions is silently forming alongside the physical economy.
94
2011 Number 4
95
96
2011 Number 4
ligent behavior. The bacterium senses something, computes something (although we may not know exactly how), and returns an appropriate response.
No brain need be involved. A primitive jellyfish doesnt have a central
nervous system or brain. What it has is a kind of neural layer or nerve
net that lets it sense and react appropriately. Im arguing that all these
aspen rootsthis vast global digital network that is sensing, computing, and reacting appropriatelyare starting to constitute a neural
layer for the economy. The second economy constitutes a neural layer
for the physical economy. Just what sort of change is this qualitatively?
Think of it this way. With the coming of the Industrial Revolution
roughly from the 1760s, when Watts steam engine appeared, through
around 1850 and beyondthe economy developed a muscular system
in the form of machine power. Now it is developing a neural system.
This may sound grandiose, but actually I think the metaphor is valid.
Around 1990, computers started seriously to talk to each other, and
all these connections started to happen. The individual machines
serversare like neurons, and the axons and synapses are the communication pathways and linkages that enable them to be in conversation with each other and to take appropriate action.
Is this the biggest change since the Industrial Revolution? Well, without
sticking my neck out too much, I believe so. In fact, I think it may
well be the biggest change ever in the economy. It is a deep qualitative
change that is bringing intelligent, automatic response to the economy. Theres no upper limit to this, no place where it has to end. Now,
Im not interested in science fiction, or predicting the singularity, or
talking about cyborgs. None of that interests me. What I am saying is
that it would be easy to underestimate the degree to which this is
going to make a difference.
I think that for the rest of this century, barring wars and pestilence, a
lot of the story will be the building out of this second economy, an
unseen underground economy that basically is giving us intelligent
reactions to what we do above the ground. For example, if Im driving
in Los Angeles in 15 years time, likely itll be a driverless car in a flow of
traffic where my cars in a conversation with the cars around it that are
in conversation with general traffic and with my car. The second economy is creating for usslowly, quietly, and steadilya different world.
97
A downside
Of course, as with most changes, there is a downside. I am concerned
that there is an adverse impact on jobs. Productivity increasing, say,
at 2.4 percent in a given year means either that the same number of
people can produce 2.4 percent more output or that we can get the
same output with 2.4 percent fewer people. Both of these are happening.
We are getting more output for each person in the economy, but overall output, nationally, requires fewer people to produce it. Nowadays,
fewer people are required behind the desk of an airline. Much of the
work is still physicalsomeone still has to take your luggage and put it
on the beltbut much has vanished into the digital world of sensing,
digital communication, and intelligent response.
Physical jobs are disappearing into the second economy, and I believe
this effect is dwarfing the much more publicized effect of jobs disappearing to places like India and China.
There are parallels with what has happened before. In the early 20th
century, farm jobs became mechanized and there was less need for farm
labor, and some decades later manufacturing jobs became mechanized
and there was less need for factory labor. Now business processesmany
in the service sectorare becoming mechanized and fewer people
are needed, and this is exerting systematic downward pressure on jobs.
We dont have paralegals in the numbers we used to. Or draftsmen,
telephone operators, typists, or bookkeeping people. A lot of that work
is now done digitally. We do have police and teachers and doctors;
where theres a need for human judgment and human interaction, we
still have that. But the primary cause of all of the downsizing weve
had since the mid-1990s is that a lot of human jobs are disappearing
into the second economy. Not to reappear.
Seeing things this way, its not surprising we are still working our way
out of the bad 200809 recession with a great deal of joblessness.
Theres a larger lesson to be drawn from this. The second economy will
certainly be the engine of growth and the provider of prosperity for
the rest of this century and beyond, but it may not provide jobs, so there
may be prosperity without full access for many. This suggests to me
that the main challenge of the economy is shifting from producing prosperity to distributing prosperity. The second economy will produce
98
2011 Number 4
wealth no matter what we do; distributing that wealth has become the
main problem. For centuries, wealth has traditionally been apportioned in the West through jobs, and jobs have always been forthcoming.
When farm jobs disappeared, we still had manufacturing jobs, and
when these disappeared we migrated to service jobs. With this digital
transformation, this last repository of jobs is shrinkingfewer of us
in the future may have white-collar business process jobsand we face
a problem.
The system will adjust of course, though I cant yet say exactly how.
Perhaps some new part of the economy will come forward and generate
a whole new set of jobs. Perhaps we will have short workweeks and
long vacations so there will be more jobs to go around. Perhaps we will
have to subsidize job creation. Perhaps the very idea of a job and of
being productive will change over the next two or three decades. The
problem is by no means insoluble. The good news is that if we do solve
it, we may at last have the freedom to invest our energies in creative acts.
99
100
Picture This
recession.
creation.
Byron Auguste is a director
in McKinseys Washington, DC,
office; Susan Lund is director of
research at the McKinsey Global
Institute (MGI) and a principal in the
Washington, DC, office; James
Manyika is a director of MGI and
101
increased dramatically
1990, and
therecessions
employment
drop
Recovery
time for US since
employment
after
has
since 2008 is unprecedented in postwar history.
increased dramatically since 1990, and the employment drop
since 2008 is unprecedented in postwar history.
Longer . . .
Months elapsed between return of real GDP to prerecession peak
and return of employment to prerecession peak1
6
1948
. . . and deeper
% decline in employment from prerecession peak,
in months since recession began2
1953
1957
1970
1974
1960
1957
1981 1990
1953
1948
2001
1
2
1960
3
4
1969
2008 recession
Lowest point: 6.34%
5
1973
7
0
1981
1990
2001
12
24
36
48
15
39
2008
>60 months
Projection, based on recent
rates of job creation
Returns to prerecession peaks are established by start of more than 1 quarter above prerecession levels; US recessions
are labeled by beginning year, with the exception of the most recent. The National Bureau of Economic Research
estimates that the current recession began in Dec 2007. GDP returned to its prerecession peak in Dec 2010.
2
Based on unemployment data as of Q1 2011; future revisions may change numbers slightly.
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis; US Bureau of Labor Statistics; McKinsey Global Institute analysis
Applied Insight
Tools, techniques, and frameworks for managers
103
Seizing the potential
of big data
110
Freeing up the sales force
for selling
104
Executive perspective
AstraZenecas big data
partnership
115
How strategic is our technology
agenda?
103
104
2011 Number 4
Executive perspective:
Applied Insight
Mark Lelinski
is vice president
of managed
markets at the
pharmaceuticals
manufacturer
AstraZeneca.
105
106
2011 Number 4
For the European telco, the discussions centered around how it might
tap into the rising tide of online
conversations about individual companies and their productsthe
millions of relevant microblog posts,
social-media conversations, search
term keywords, head-to-head brand
comparisons, and customer feedback postings that were now available
on the Web. Recognizing the
importance of the effortand the
Align on strategic
choices
Applied Insight
107
108
2011 Number 4
As for the retailer, its executives determined that the goal was to create
an information grid that would
provide for a range of data-sharing
and -analysis activities across
the company. However, the leaders
decided against a company-wide
initiative, since the retailers culture
generally favored innovation at
the business unit level. Therefore,
the retailer tapped an executive with
technology and entrepreneurial
experience to launch a study across
key business unitsan effort that
ultimately surfaced 80 potential
big data projects. Each was then
ranked by its net present value
and mapped against the companys
strategic objectives.
The first project the retailer pursued
was a revamp of its fragmented
customer-relationship-management
(CRM) system and the creation
of a single data pool that company
executives plan to use in multiple
ways. One pilot project, for example, is exploring the use of tablet
devices by salespeople, in hopes that
easier access to inventory data,
customer profiles, and product information will help them close more
sales. A second initiative enlisted
online developers to create virtual
storefronts for third-party Web sites.
By using algorithms, survey market prices, and predetermined discounts to link the storefronts to
the inventory systems of the retailer
and its vendors, the initiative is
helping it counter its competitors
third-party sales strategywhile
also improving the commissions of
its sales force and vendors.
In the case of the telecom provider,
a cross-functional executive com-
Understand
the organizational
implications
Applied Insight
109
110
Angus Grieg
Most sales reps spend less than half of their time actually selling.
By reshaping sales operations, companies can help them focus on
their real job.
111
That was the wake-up call the company needed. For two years, it
worked to streamline its global sales
operation by creating sales factories comprising specialized sales
support staff with clear responsibilities and deal coordinators to
shepherd sales through the system on behalf of reps. Internal processes were standardized and
simplified, and a comprehensive performance-management system
was implemented. While not all companies can successfully achieve
these difficult and time-consuming
transformations, the rewards are
worthwhile for those that rise to the
112
2011 Number 4
Applied Insight
113
Making it happen
Transforming sales operations isnt
easy. First, companies have a
natural aversion to tinkering with the
sales forcesenior executives
must overcome the common fear
that disrupting it will jeopardize
revenue. Second, executives from
not only sales and sales support
but other functions, such as finance,
must work together to recognize
and pursue opportunities. Third, successful transformations require
steadfast support from the very top:
someone must compel executives
from across the organization to sit
down, share data, and be willing
to talk about whats not working.
A top leader must override internal
politics, see the big picture, and
focus on the best solution regardless of past practices.
In addition, new capabilities and
talent may be required because
successful transformations fundamentally change business processes and the ways multiple stakeholder groups interact, from customers to both the front and back
offices. When one consumerpackaged-goods company redesigned its Latin American sales
operations, for example, it central-
114
2011 Number 4
115
Bill Butcher
How strategic is
our technology agenda?
Brad Brown and Johnson Sikes
116
2011 Number 4
Applied Insight
117
118
2011 Number 4
Applied Insight
119
1
120
Extra Point
Copyright 2011
McKinsey & Company.
All rights reserved.
Published since 1964
by McKinsey & Company,
55 East 52nd Street,
New York, New York 10022.
ISSN: 0047-5394
ISBN: 978-0-9829260-1-7
Cover artwork by Celia Johnson
McKinsey Quarterly meets
the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) chain
of custody standards.
The paper used in the
Quarterly is certified as being
produced in an environmentally responsible, socially
beneficial, and economically viable way.
Printed in the United States
of America.
Highlights:
New thinking on competing
through data from McKinsey,
MITs Erik Brynjolfsson, Butler
University basketball coach
Brad Stevens, and others
Oils uncertain future
A senior executives guide to
cybersecurity
Getting the feedback you need
How strategic is your technology
agenda?
Confronting the beliefs that
undermine womens careers
W. Brian Arthur on the
second economy
A new era for commodities
ISBN: 978-0-9829260-1-7
mckinseyquarterly.com china.mckinseyquarterly.com