Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Herv DEGEE
University of Liege
Hughes SOMJA
INSA Rennes
General
Dissemination of information for training Lisbon 10-11 February 2011
General
Dissemination of information for training Lisbon 10-11 February 2011
=> Design
g of dissipative
p
structure
1. Define the objective: a global mechanism
2. Pay a price for the mechanism to be global:
criteria for numerous dissipative zones
capacity design of resistances of all elements
other than the plastic zones
3 Pay a price at local zones: criteria aiming at local ductility
3.
For instance - In steel: rules for connections
classes off sections
plastic rotation capacity
- In composite steel concrete: position of neutral axis
General
Dissemination of information for training Lisbon 10-11 February 2011
p
e
L
General
Dissemination of information for training Lisbon 10-11 February 2011
General
Dissemination of information for training Lisbon 10-11 February 2011
LOCAL
MECHANISMS
Local
Mechanisms
DISSIPATIVE
NON DISSIPATIVE
Dissipative
Non dissipative
Local
Dissipative
p
&
Non dissipative
Mechanisms
N
Compression or tension yielding
V
Yielding in shear
F
Slippage with friction
M
Plastic deformations in narrow zone
exhaust available material ductility
Plastic hinge
M
F
Ovalization of hole
General
Dissemination of information for training Lisbon 10-11 February 2011
Correspondance between
reality & hypothesis
is required
General
Dissemination of information for training Lisbon 10-11 February 2011
General
Dissemination of information for training Lisbon 10-11 February 2011
TYPE of STRUCTURE
Ductility Class
DCM
DCH
5 u / 1
2,5
F
Frame
with
ith eccentric
t i bracings
b
i
5 u / 1
Inverted pendulum
2 u / 1
4 u / 1
5 u / 1
General
Dissemination of information for training Lisbon 10-11 February 2011
10
tf
tw
Cross S
C
Sectional
ti
l Class
Cl
class 1
class 2
class 3
class 1, 2, 3, 4
11
Illustration of Design
g 1
Steel Moment Resisting Frame
Andr PLUMIER
University of Liege
12
Design objectives
Plastic hinges in beams or their
connections, not in the columns
Weak Beam-Strong Column WBSC
Global ductility
5
4
3
2
2,9m
Y4
Y3
Y2
Y1
6m
x6
6m
x5
6m
x4
6m
x3
6m
m
x2
x1
8m
8m
8m
Seismic resistance
Peripheral and interior moment frames
in 2 directions
Max q: 5 u/1=5x1,3= 6,5
q = 4 chosen
=> DCM
S ti
Sections
class
l
1 or 2
Design steps
Preliminary design
D fi minimum
Define
i i
beam
b
sections
ti
deflection
d
fl ti & resistance
i t
criteria
it i
under gravity loading
Iterations until all design criteria fulfilled
- column sections checking Weak Beam Strong Column
- seismic mass m = (G + Ei Q)
- p
period T
by
y code formula
- resultant base shear Fb => storey forces
- static analysis
one plane frame
lateral
lateral loads
loads magnified by torsion factor =>
>E
- static analysis
gravity loading (G + 2i Q)
- stability check
P- effects
parameter
in seismic loading situation: gravity loading= G + 2i Q
- displacement checks under service earthquake = 0,5 x design EQ
- combination action effects E + G + 2i Q
- design
d i
checks:
h k resistance
i t
off sections
ti
i t bilit off elements
instability
l
t
- Design of connections
- Design with RBS Reduced Beam Sections
13
14
I =23130.104 mm4
I =16270. 104 mm4
After iterations
Beams direction x: IPE 500
I= 48200.104 mm4
di
direction
i y: IPEA 450 I=
I 29760.10
29760 104 mm4
15
Columns: HE340M:
Wpl,strong axis
M
All S355 => criteria
it i is:
i W
Rc
1,3 M Rb
pl, columns
1,3Wpl, beams
16
F5= 139,5
F6= 167,5
17
18
19
20
Damage limitation
Non-structural elements of brittle materials attached to the structure:
d r 0,005 h
Ductile non-structural elements: d r 0,0075 h
21
= Es + G + Ei .Q
Design
Storey
i t
interstore
t
l t
lateral
l
y drift
forces
Shear
at storey
Ei :
G + Ei .Q = 35,42
kN/m
Total
cumulative Storey
gravity
height
load
at Ei :
storey
sto
ey Ei :
hi [m]
Ptot [kN]
Interstorey
d ift sensitivity
drift
iti it
coefficient
(di -di-1):
Ei :
di [m]
dr[m]
Vi [kN]
E0
d0
dr0
E1
d1
27,9
0,100
E2
d2
55,8
0,141
E3
d3
83,7
0,122
E4
d4
0,093
E5
d5
0,062
E6
d6
0,037
Vtot [kN]
h6 2,9
(Ei -Ei-1) :
22
Dynamic analysis
23
FbX = 586 kN
FbX = 396 kN
=> OK
one frame
one frame
Diagram
Of
Bending
Moments
Under E
24
25
= Es + G + Ei .Q
G + Ei .Q = 35,42
Total
cumulative Storey
gravity
it
h i ht
height
Ei :
load at
storey Ei :
hi [[m]]
Ptot [kN]
kN/m
Design
Storey
interstore lateral
y drift
forces
att
(di -di-1):
Ei :
storey Ei :
di [m]
dr[m]
Vi [kN]
Vtot [kN]
E0
d0
dr0
E1
d1
0,022
,
dr1 0,022
,
V1
26,6
, Vtot 1
396,2
, Ptot 1 5100 h1
2,9
,
0,099
,
E2
d2
V2
42,9 Vtot 2
2,9
0,137
E3
d3
V3
50,0 Vtot 3
2,9
0,118
E4
d4
V4
61,1 Vtot 4
2,9
0,086
E5
d5
V5
85,0 Vtot 5
2,9
0,054
E6
d6
V6
130,
Vtot 6
6
2,9
0,027
Absolute
displacem
Storey ent of the
storey :
Shear
h6
Interstorey
drift
sensitivity
coefficient
Elements checks
Action effects to consider are:
26
OK
Other checks
Beam lateral torsional buckling
M att beam
b
column
l
connection
ti
= Mpl
Lateral supports
may be required
27
28
M Sd,sup
V wp,Ed
tf
M Pl,Rd,left
Pl Rd left
tf,left
f left
h
h
d left
dc
tf
M Pl,Rd,right
tf,right
V wp,Ed
M Sd,inf
Vwp,Ed = Mpl,Rd, left / (dleft 2tf,left) + Mpl,Rd, right / (dright 2tf,right) + VEd, column
Often: Vwp,Ed > Vwp,Rd
doubler plates
welded on web or placed // to web
welds plate shear resistance
29
Connections: EC8
avoid localisation of plastic strains
Dissemination of information for training Lisbon 10-11 February 2011
30
Design of
Example
Design a) Lya=10 mm y, max= 2,38
2 38 %
l = 0,0238.10 = 0, 238 mm
= 0,238/(400/2)=1,2mrad<<<25 mrad
Design b) Lyyb=400 mm y, max = 2,38 %
l = 9,52 mm
= 9,52/(400/2)= 47,6mrad>>35 mrad
Conclusions
Plastic zone length hsection
is required for effective hinge
Adequate y,max and fu / fy needed
greater beam depth
=> less rotation capacity
31
1 bad
woolf
C
Connection
ti Type
T
Maximum
D tilit Class
Ductility
Cl
allowed
ll
d
Europe
US
DCL *
OMF*
SMF
SMF
SMF
SMF
SMF
SMF
32
Northridge 1994
low ductility
33
34
35
Dogbone
D b
or RBS Reduced
R d
d beam
b
section.
ti
Beam flanges welded, beam web welded to
shear tab welded to column flange DCM -DCH
Design criteria
0,5b a 0,75b
0,65h
,
s 0,85h
,
b: flange width
h: beam depth
0,2b c 0,25b
be = b 2c
36
Grenoble.
R
Rossignol
i
l Ski Factory.
F t
2008
2008.
A remark
If beam flanges are welded to the column flanges
and beam web is welded to a shear tab welded to the column flange
the flange butt welds transmit Mpl,flanges
the web welds transmit Mpl,web
pl web + shear VEd
MRd,connection 1,1 ov Mpl,Rd,beam
Mpl,flanges = bf tf fy (d+ tf )
Mpl,web = tw d2 fy / 4
MRd,web,connection 1,1 ov Mpl,web = 1,1 ov tw d2 fy / 4
=>
> shear
h
tab
t b stronger
t
than
th the
th web
b
=> Top and bottom welds on shear tab required
in addition to web fillet welds for shear
37
38
35 50
130
IPE A 450
HE 340 M
16
70 60
70
40 40
4 M 36
82
82
IPE 500
82
6 M 20
16
82
70
60 1000
60
13,1
150
IPE 500
60 70
IPE A 450
100 60
HE 340 M
100
13,1
IPE A 450
60 60
Design of connection
IPE500 beamX IPEA450beamY - HE340M column
4 M 36
39
IPE 500
HE 340 M
16
70 60
82
82
70
4 M 36
82
6 M 20
16
82
70
60 100
0
100
60
13,1
IPE A 450
60 70
60 60
100 60
13,1
4 M 36
40
Shear VRd,connection
=> 6 M20 10.9 bolts on sides of web
Bolts resistance: 6x122,5/1,25=588>448kN
Plate bearing resistance:
VRd,plate= (6 x 193 x 40)/(10 x 1,25)= 3705>448kN
IPE 500
HE 340 M
16
70 60
0
82
82
2
70
4 M 36
82
6 M 20
16
82
70
60
13,1
60 1
100
100
IPE A 450
60 70
60 60
0
10
00 60
13,1
4 M 36
41
x355)/4 =
t = 38,1 mm min
t = 40 mm
2213.103
x 70
F tr,rd
IPE 500
HE 340 M
42
43
35 50
150
130
40 40
IPE A 450
44
45
46
Storey
1
2
3
4
5
6
IInterstorey
t
t
d ift
drift
sensitivity coefficient
Without With RBS
RBS
0,099
0,105
0,137
0,147
0,118
0,126
0,086
0,092
0,054
0,057
0,027
,
0,028
,
amplification
lifi ti
factor 1/ (1- )
With RBS
1,11
1,17
1,14
1
1
1
47
L'
L
RBS
RBS
M ppl,, Rd,RBS
,
V Ed,E
x
M pl,
pl Rd,RBS
Rd RBS
hc
V Ed,E
x'
48
49
L'
L
RBS
RBS
M pl, Rd,RBS
V Ed,E
x
M pl, Rd,RBS
hc
V Ed,E
x'
MEd,connection=1,1ovMpl,Rd,,RBS+VEd,E x dist x
x=a+s/2=262, 5 mm
MEd,connection =1,1x1,25x537+368x0,2625 = 834 kNm
Due to RBS, MEd,connection reduced from 1071 kNm to 834 kNm = -28%
VRd,connection 448 kN without RBS
VRd,connection 368 kN with RBS
Reduction in design shear at connection = - 21%
50
Illustration of Design 2
Composite
p
Steel Concrete
Moment Resisting Frame
Hughes SOMJA
INSA Rennes
Herv DEGEE
University of Liege
Andr PLUMIER
University of Liege
51
Main
Beam
6m
6m
6m
Z
X
7m
7m
21 m
5 storey building
Height 17
17,5
5m
Slab thickness 120 mm
Seconda
ary
Beam
6m
24 m
3.5 m 3.5 m 3
3.5 m 3.5 m 3.5 m
17.5 m
Main
Beam
7m
7m
7m
21 m
7m
52
4 design cases
Seismicity
High
0,25g
Comp. steel
S355
High
0,25g
Comp. Comp.
S355
Low
0,10g
Comp. steel
S235
Low
0,10g
Comp. Comp.
S235
Permanent Actions
Slab: 5 kN/m2
Partitions: 3 kN/m
Variable Actions
Uniformly distributed loads: qk = 3 kN/m2
Concentrated loads: Qk = 4 kN
S
Snow
load
l d altitude
ltit d A = 1200 m q = 1
1.1
1 kN/m
kN/ 2
Wind Load : qp(Z) = 1.4 kN/m2
Seismic Action
I = 1,00 aggR =0,25g
0,10g
type 1 design spectrum soil B
DCM
q=4
Values of factors
0 0.7
1 0.5
2 0.3
53
Q = Qimposed + Qsnow
Case1
Case2
Case3
Case4
1900
1963
1916
1994
Fb m * S d (T1 ) *
Fb 1963*0.535*0.85
Fb 892 kN
1 0.6*
1.3
x
L
Fb 892
178.4 kN
5
5
FbX t * FbX
54
Case
Seismic static
q
forces
1
equivalent
E1 (kN)
15.7
E2 (kN)
31.4
E3 (kN)
47.1
E4 (kN)
62.8
E5 (kN)
78.5
Case Case
2
3
15.5
7.7
30.9 15.4
46.4 23.1
61.9 30.8
77.3 38.5
Case
4
7.7
15.3
23.0
30.7
38.3
55
with
2=0.3
G : Dead load
Q : Imposed load
S : Snow load
W Wind
W:
Wi d load
l d
56
Composite Beams
Steel Columns
Composite Columns
57
4 design
T simpl Sd(T) T
Sd(T)
EC8(s) EC8 Exact Exact
S i i it
Seismicity
B
Beams
Columns
C
l
Steell
St
m/s
/ 2 (s)
( )
m/s
/ 2
High 0,25g Comp. steel
S355 0,727
1,26 1,64
0,56
Seismic
mass
t
1900
High
S355 0,727
1,26
1,72
0,56
1963
Low
S235 0,727
0,51
1,35
0,27
1916
Low
S235 0,727
0,51
1,41
0,27
1994
1.96 m / s
1.84 m / s
T1 C t * H
T1 0.727
0 727s
High seismicity
1.265 m / s
3
4
0.8 m/s 2
0.736 m / s
Low
T 2s
T 1.85 s
T 0.727 s
T 0.5 s
0.2 m / s
T 0.15 s
0.5 m / s
T S
58
Analysis
Beams: EC8 limited to steel profile + slab s,composite
like EC4
2 flexural stiffness:
EI1 for zones under M
M+ uncracked sections
EI2 for zones under Mcrackeds,steel
sections
s,composite
Ea /Ecm = 7
An equivalent Ieq constant over span may be used:
Ieq = 0,6
0 6 I1 + 0,4
0 4 I2
For composite columns:
(EI)c = 0,9( EIa + r Ecm Ic + E Is )
E : steel
t l Ecm : concrete
t
r a reduction factor r = 0,5.
Ia, Ic and Is : I of steel section, concrete and re-bars respectively
59
Effective Width
Static
Eurocode 4-1
beff b0 bei
60
Effective Width
Seismic
Eurocode 8-1
Effective width beff concrete
fl
flange:
be1 + be2
Partial effective widths be
in Tables, not b1 & b2
2 Tables. Determination of
Elastic stiffness: I
Plastic resistance Mpl
M inducing
compression in slab: +
tension
EC8 Table
Partial effective width be
off slab
l b
for computation of I
used in elastic analysis
61
be
be for I
(Elastic Analysis)
At exterior column
Not present,
or re-bars not anchored
EC8 Table
Partial effective width be
of slab
for evaluation of
plastic moment Mpl
Transverse element
Negative M
Negative M
P iti M
Positive
Positive M
Interior
column
Exterior
column
Exterior
column
IInterior
t i
column
Exterior
column
Positive M
Exterior
column
Positive M
Exterior
column
Seismic re-bars
For negative M : 0
For positive M : 0,025 l
be for MRd
(Plastic
resistance)
0,1 l
62
Not defined
Mpl,Rd875 mm
525 mm
700 mm
1050 mm
1400 mm
63
beff
12 mm
200 mm
20 mm
120 mm
20 mm
IPE330_Case 1 and 2
IPE360_Case 3 and 4
Composite
p
beams
Composite
p
columns
Steel columns
=> class 2
=> class 1
=> class 1
64
c
b = bc
tf
tw
c
b = bc
h = hc
tw
h = hc
tf
Remark
Favourable influence of concrete encasement on local ductility.
Concrete:
- prevents inward local buckling of the steel walls
- reduces strength degradation
=> Limits c/t of wall slenderness of composite
p
sections
> those for pure steel sections
Increase up to 50% if:
confining hoops
fully encased sections
additional straight bars welded to inside of flanges
for partially encased sections
c
b = bc
tf
tw
c
b = bc
s s s s s s s
65
h = hc
tw
h = hc
tf
note: = (fy/235)
0.5
with fy in MPa
14
DCH
q>4
10
20
14
30
21
13,5
30
21
13,5
42
38
33
38
38
33
66
x
d
s,steel
s,composite
67
beff
12 mm
s,composite
200 mm
20 mm
120 mm
20 mm
d
s,steel
IPE330_Case 1 and 2
IPE360_Case 3 and 4
s,composite
Case1
Case2
Case3
Case4
IPE330
IPE330
IPE360 IPE360
0.27
0.27
0.36
0.36
0.268
0.268
0.239
0.239
68
7m
7m
7m
21 m
Hi h seismicity
High
i i it
Blue: with steel column
Red: with composite column
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
7m
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
7m
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
7m
21 m
L
Low
seismicity
i i it
HEA360 HEA
A360 HEA360 HEA360 HEA3
360
HEA320 HEA320 HEA320 HEA320 HEA3
320
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
IPE330
HEA360 HEA
A360 HEA360 HEA360 HEA3
360
HEA320
HEA320 HEA320 HEA3
320
IPE330
IPE330
HEA360 HEA
A360 HEA360 HEA360 HEA3
360
HEA320 HEA320 HEA320 HEA320 HEA3
320
3.5 m
3.5 m
3.5 m
3.5 m
3.5 m
17.5 m
HEA40
00
HEA400
HEA400
HEA360 HEA
A360 HEA360 HEA360 HEA3
360
HEA320 HEA320 HEA320 HEA320 HEA3
320
HEA
A400
IPE360
HEA400
IPE360
HEA45
50
IPE360
IPE360
HEA450
IPE360
IPE360
HEA450
HEA400
HEA450
HEA450
IPE360
HEA
A450
IPE360
IPE360
HEA450
IPE360
HEA400
IPE360
IPE360
HEA
A450
IPE360
IPE360
HEA450
HEA400
HEA400
HEA
A400
HEA450
IPE360
HEA400
IPE360
HEA400
IPE360
HEA450
IPE360
IPE360
HEA
A450
IPE360
IPE360
IPE360
HEA45
50
IPE360
HEA40
00
IPE360
HEA40
00
IPE360
HEA45
50
IPE360
HEA450
HEA45
50
HEA40
00
HEA400
HEA450
IPE360
IPE360
HEA400
HEA450
IPE360
IPE360
HEA
A400
HEA
A450
HEA450
HEA400
3.5 m
3.5
5m
3.5 m
17.5 m
3.5 m
3.5 m
Analysis
69
EC8 check
Resistance of dissipative zones
Check: plastic hinges at beam ends
Mpl,Rd-
M Wplb * f y
70
Mpl,Rd+ MEd+
Mpl,Rd- MEd-
Mpl,Rd
M Wplb * f y
495 kN.m (IPE330)
M
kN m (IPE360)
415 kN.m
min
Static
Actions
(EC4)
Seismic
Actions
(EC8)
min =
Mpl,Rd / MEd
0.933
0.826
1,21
0.953
0.840
1,19
0.979
0.764
1,31
1.000
0.779
1,28
,
71
d r = q.d re
EC8 check
Second order effects
P tot
V tot
Ptot * d r
0.1
Vtot * h
N
h
N
V
Example
High seismicity steel columns
Storey N.
1
2
3
4
5
de [m]
0.007
0.019
0.030
0.038
0.044
[m]
0.007
0.012
0.011
0.008
0.006
V [kN]
15.70
31.40
47.10
62.79
78.49
Vtot [kN]
235.48
219.78
188.38
141.28
78.49
Ptot [kN]
3799.96
3046.62
2293.28
1539.94
786.60
0.032
0.048
0.038
0.025
0.017
72
EC8 check
Damage limitations in non
non-structural
structural elements
d r * v 0.010h
Storey
1
2
3
4
5
with dr q * d re
dr * (mm)
Case 1
Case 2
14
16
24
26
22
22
16
18
12
10
q=4
Case 3
4
8
8
6
4
Case 4
4
10
6
6
6
=0,5
0,010 h (mm)
35
35
35
35
35
73
Elements checks
Action effects to consider are:
393
1.212 (Case1)
324.20
337
1.311 (Case3)
257.00
CHECKS
Beam deflections
Wp L3
Wu L
L
max,i
74
k c C4
k s L2
M cr
GI at 2 Ea I afz
L
Real risk: M Ed
max
0.5
M b , Rd
Bracings required
Calculation indicate 1 m interdistance OK
Limitation of compression in beams
N Pll , Rdd Aa * f y
N Pl , Rd
f sk * As
0.85
0 85*
5767 kN (IPE330)
4708 kN (IPE360)
f ck * Ac
N Ed
max
149
142
127
121
N Ed
0.15
check:
N pl , Rd
75
VEd
max
234 kN
237 kN
231 kN
234 kN
End
lower
upper
lower
upper
lower
upper
lower
upper
NEd,G
Ed G
kN
MEd,G
Ed G
kNm
NEd,E
Ed E
kN
MEd,E
Ed E
kNm
N*Ed
kN
M*Ed
kNm
MN,y,Rd
N y Rd
kNm
-814
-810
-1652
-1648
-1652
-1648
-814
-810
-41
79
1
-3
-1
3
41
-79
119
119
-9
-9
8
8
-118
-118
140
-39
158
-76
158
-76
138
-39
-616
-612
-1666
-1663
-1638
-1634
-1011
-1007
192
14
264
-130
262
-124
272
-143
751
751
574
574
578
579
684
685
76
max
57.54 kN
1
1
*39.96=
*39.96
max
1
1 0.048
=1.05*39.96=41.80 kN
*
VEd
max
*
VEd
max
max
V Pl ,a ,Rd
A * f y
3
1003.48 kN (Case1)
892.490 kN (Case3)
77
Column buckling
Interaction factors kyy and kzz for uneven moments at column ends
k yy
N *Ed
C my 1 y 0,2
y N plRd
Stability checks
y N plRd
*
N Ed
z N plRd
k yy
k zy
M *y , Edd
max
max
LT M plRd
M *y , Ed
LT M plRd
78
79
AT
AT
AT
AT
80
35 50
130
IPE A 450
HE 340 M
16
70 60
70
40 40
4 M 36
82
82
IPE 500
82
6 M 20
16
82
70
60 1000
60
13,1
150
IPE 500
60 70
IPE A 450
100 60
HE 340 M
100
13,1
IPE A 450
60 60
4 M 36
Another example
81
Ispra test
1999
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
Structural Types
Moment resisting frames
Frames with concentric bracing
Frames with eccentric bracings
Specific
Composite wall structures Type 1 and 2
Mixed systems Type 3 = Concrete walls/columns.
Steel or composite beams
TYPE I
Steel or composite
moment frame with
concrete infill panels.
TYPE 2
Concrete walls
reinforced by encased
vertical steel sections
sections.
TYPE 3
91
92
A steel beam
B face bearing plates
C reinforced concrete column
A
C
93
94
B
E
Composite frames
with eccentric bracings
g
A
C
A : seismic link
B : face bearing plate
C : concrete
D : additional longitudinal rebars
E : confining ties
T
95
Composite Frame
with
Eccentric and Concentric Steel Bracings
Herv DEGEE
University of Liege
Andr PLUMIER
University of Liege
96
Symbol
Value
Storey height
Total height of the building
Beam length in X-direction EBF
Beam length in Y-direction CBF
Building width in X-direction
Building width in Y-direction
h
H
lX
lY
LX
LY
3.5 m
17 5 m
17.5
7m
6m
21 m
24 m
97
Details of values
al es
Dimensions
Characteristic yield strength of reinforcing steel
Partial safety factor for steel rebars
Design yield strength of reinforcement steel
Characteristic compressive strength of concrete
Partial safety factor for concrete
Design compressive strength of concrete
Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete for the
design under gravity loads combinations
Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete for the
design under seismic loads combination
Characteristic yield strength of steel profile
Partial factor for steel profile
Modulus of elasticity of steel profile
Symbol
fy
s
fyd
fc
c
fcd
Value
500
1 15
1.15
434.78
30
1.5
20
Ec
33000
N/mm
Ec,sc
16500
N/mm
fy
355
1
210000
N/mm
Ea
Units
N/mm
N/mm
N/mm
N/mm
N/mm
98
Earthquake action
Design
g ground
g
acceleration 0.25g
g
soil type B
type 1 response spectrum
DCM design with a behaviour factor q = 4
Type 1 response spectrum - soil type B
Dimensions
Symbol
Soil factor
S
Lower limit of period of constant spectral acceleration branch
TB
Upper limit of period of constant spectral acceleration branch
TC
Beginning of the constant displacement response range
TD
Value
1.2
0.15
0.5
2
Units
s
s
s
Loads
Permanent actions + self-weight of the slab
Variable actions
Snow
Wind
99
G = 5.858 kN/m
Q = 3kN/m
S = 1.11 kN/m
W = 1.4 kN/m
2i= 0.3
= 0.8 E,i = 2,i = 0,24
Steps
General. Design of slab under gravity loads (no support of EBF)
I
D i
Design
off columns
l
under
d gravity
i loads
l d (no
(
support off EBF) I
Design of beams under gravity loads (no support of EBF) I
Not presented available in text I
Torsion effects
EBF
2nd order effects P-
Design
g of eccentric bracings
g under seismic combination of
loads including torsion and P-
Check of beams and of eccentric bracings under gravity loads
with EBF as support to the beam
Design of one link connection
CBF
Design of concentric bracings under seismic combination of
loads including torsion and PP
Check of beams and columns
Design of one diagonal connection
Ch k off di
Check
diaphragm
h
Check of secondary elements
100
101
Final design
Composite aspect
TY = 1.45 s
Slab
102
Unit
Applied
moment
Resistant
moment
MEd,slab,X,GC
[kNm/m]
MRd,slab,X
Rebars
for 1m of
slab
Steel
Section
As,X
Spacing
S
i
of rebars
[kNm/m]
[mm]
[mm/m]
[mm
/m]
[mm]
1187
100 50
1585
100 50
SPAN (lower
layer of rebars)
66
73
SUPPORT (upper
layer of rebars)
92
95
10 T10
+ 2 T16
10 T10
+ 4 T16
Y-direction
SPAN (lower
layer of rebars)
SUPPORT (upper
layer of rebars)
35
49
10 T10
785
100
41
49
10 T10
785
100
103
in X direction
yield in shear
long links
yield in bending
intermediate links
104
Short links
Stiffer structure
Plastic deformation are in shear of the web:
- high ductility, no welds,
- lateral buckling minor problem
Long links
Examples of frames
with eccentric bracing
e = length of seismic link
105
Link
section
NEd
kN
NEd/Npll
MEd Mpll
kNm kNm
MEd/Mpll
VEd
kN
Vpll
kN
=
1,5 Vpl/VEd
1
2
3
4
5
HE450B
HE450B
HE400B
HE340B
HE280B
75
75
72
72
70
0,010
0 010
0,010
0,011
0,011
0 015
0,015
285
296
247
195
123
0,25
0 25
0,25
0,26
0,27
0 27
0,27
950
987
824
651
405
1182
1182
1011
761
547
1,867
1 797
1,797
1,840
1,752
2 028
2,028
1141
1141
933
708
455
106
NEd,G = 47.4 kN
NEd,E = 495.2 kN
=>OK
107
Plastic resistance
From analysis
VEd=950
950 kN
MEd=285 kNm
NEd=75 kN
Section
overstrength * **
1182/952 =1,24
1,24
MEd/Mpl,Rd = 0,25
NEd/Npl,Rd = 0,01
108
Link in elevation
Section BB
Plan view of link base plate
109
Link in elevation
Section AA
Elevation view of connection
110
111
112
113
114
a)
b)
c)
Diagonals should have
similar force
force-displacement
displacement characteristics in both directions
A A
A A
0, 05
115
Elastic range:
compression and tension diagonals contribute equally
to stiffness and resistance
1st buckling:
degradation
g
in behaviour of compression diagonal
Behaviour evolution with cycles
EC8: 2 different design approach
X bracings:
tension diagonals only
V or bracings:
b
i
compression
i
and
d tension
t
i
diagonals
di
l
New solutions to avoid problems with analysis
dissipative connections with Rfy < Rbuckling,diagonals
special design of diagonals (Buckling Restrained Bracings -BRB)
116
Design of diagonals
N Ed,G3
Ed G3
Npl,Rd NEd,E
1,3 < 2,0
i = NRd/N
/ ed max 1,25 min
N Ed,E2
N Ed,E1
Ed E1
N Ed,E3
117
118
N pl,Rd
0,3 N pl,Rd
Concentric bracings
Storey
1st (ground level)
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
119
Y direction
Steel
profile
UPE 160
UPE 160
UPE 180
UPE 160
UPE 120
Results of analysis
NEd,CBi NRd,CB1
A
mm2
2170
2170
2510
2170
1540
kN
492
531
657
531
373
kN
770
770
891
770
546
i
NRd/NEd
1,56
1,45
1,35
1,45
1 46
1,46
1,80
1,80
1,70
1,80
2 15
2,15
0,17
0,17
0,15
0,14
0 11
0,11
120
121
122
123
124
Dissipative connections
125
Interest
designed to have connection resistance < diagonal buckling strength
=> Analytical
A l ti l difficulties
diffi lti avoided
id d
all members in the model for simple analysis.
all the results of the analysis may be used directly
no distinct rules for X, V or decoupled braces
additional stiffness in comparison to tension diagonal only model
compensates
p
for the additional flexibility
y of semi-rigid
g connections
Can be standardised components with calibrated strength,
obviating problems of diagonal overstrength in the design of beams
and columns =>
>ov = 1,0
After an earthquake, easy replacement of deformed components of
connections
Higher q
=6
126
Dissipative connections
in frames with concentric bracings
Design condition:
Deformation capacity of connections allows global deformation of the
structure
Di i ti diagonals:
Dissipative
di
l
l
low
in
i all
ll length
l
th l provide
id hi
high
h dl = x l
Dissipative connections:
dl to be realised in the connection
dl = dr / cos
cos = l / (l + h)1/2
dr interstorey drift dr = q x dre
Example
dr / h = 3,5%
,
; l=6m ; h=3m
cos = 0,894 ; dr = 0,105 ; dl = 117 mm
Dissipative diagonals: = 1,7%
Dissipative connections:
required deformation capacity: 117 /2 = 58,5 mm
=> Special design 2001 ULg
ULg, INERD Project
Project, 2 design:
pin connection
U connection
Frames
with concentric bracings
and dissipative connections
INERD connections
127
128
129
130
The end