Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CHAPTER 20
20.1
288
Alpha particles
20.2
Figure 20.4
The alpha
particle source
americium-241 in
an ionising smoke
detector
289
a harmless inert gas. This is why smoke detectors pose no danger to the occupants of
houses; however, their disposal in landfill presents a problem for the environment.
Alpha particles possess the charge of two protons. When they move through
an electric or magnetic field a force is exerted on them. This force causes them to
accelerate and deflect from their original path.
Beta particles
Beta particles are high-speed electrons that come from the nucleus. Electrons are
not found in the nucleus. A neutron-rich nucleus may be a source of a beta particle
when a neutron spontaneously decays into a proton and an electron. The electron
is immediately ejected from the nucleus at high speed (i.e. a beta particle) and the
nucleus from which it originated has one extra protonso it changes its atomic
number and thus element. Beta particles are much smaller and have only about
1/7200th the mass of an alpha particle. They cannot cause ionisation as well as alpha
particles, but they can penetrate matter further. Where alpha particles can be stopped
by a sheet of paper, beta particles will be stopped by a sheet of metal.
Beta particles have the charge of an electron and also experience a force when
they move through electric or magnetic fields. At the same speed, a beta particle will
experience half the force that an alpha particle does. The very small mass of beta
particles compared to alpha particles means that the force they experience causes a
much greater deflection, and their paths will be observed to bend to a much greater
extent than alpha particles.
Gamma rays
paper
metal
(e.g. aluminium
sheet)
lead or concrete
290
Radiation
What it is
Ionising ability
Penetrating
power
Effect of electric
or magnetic field
(alpha) particle
He nucleus
i.e. two protons
and two neutrons
High
Low
Small deflection
(beta) particle
An electron
Moderate
Moderate
Great deflection
(gamma) ray
Electromagnetic
radiation
Low
High
No deflection
Warning: This investigation involves the use of radioactive materials. These should be stored
carefully in lead-lined containers whenever they are not being used. They should be handled
with care and accounted for at the conclusion of the lesson.
Apparatus
paper
Method
first-hand
investigation
PFA
P4
physics skills
11.2 AE
11.3 AD
12.1 AD
12.2 A, B
12.4 A, C, D, E
14.1 A, E
TR
n Hold each source at the end of the GeigerMller tube and take a count over a 20-second
period.
n For each source, place the paper, then metal sheets and glass between the source and
concrete
the GeigerMller tube and take a reading of the countlead
overor 20-second
periods.
n Record the results in a table and compare the different sources penetrating power
through the materials used.
Risk assessment
matrix
available.
n Use different radioactive sources in the cloud chamber (see Fig. 20.7) and compare the
direction and beta particles to deflect more in the opposite direction. Any gamma ray
paths will be undeflected.
Figure 20.7
Radioactive
sources used in
this investigation
radioactive
source
cloud
chamber
alpha particle paths
291
20.3
The solar wind is a stream of particles ejected from the Sun. It consists mostly of
protons travelling on average 400 km s1. This speed can vary from between
300800 km s1. Electrons and ions make up a small percentage of the solar wind.
The Suns extremely hot corona (see Fig. 20.8), a region surrounding the Sun that
extends as far as several million kilometres above the photosphere (the surface of
the Sun), causes particles to move so fast that gravity cannot keep them around the
Sun. At about one million degrees Celsius, the corona is the source of the solar wind.
It is also the source of coronal mass ejectionslarge amounts of solar wind material
flung out into space in times of magnetic storms on the Sun.
The density of the solar wind is measured in the number of protons per cubic
centimetre (p cm3). Although usually between 110 p cm3, the density can be many
times this when a solar flare, or coronal mass ejection, is directed towards and strikes
the Earth.
WWW<
USEFUL WEBSITE:
Monitor the Suns activity:
http://www.spaceweather.com/
magnetotail
solar cusp
plasma sheet
neutral sheet
Earths
atmosphere
(0-100 km)
bow shock
magnetosheath
The solar
wind is being
constantly
Figure 20.9 The solar wind travels through space and is deflected by the Earths
measured and
magnetosphere
recorded by a
space observatory
known as SOHOSolar and Heliospheric Observatory, which orbits the Sun in a
position where the Earths gravitational field is exactly balanced by the Suns. SOHO
is about 1.5 million kilometres away from the Earth in a line directly between the
Earth and the Sun.
292
Sunspots
n
20.4
Sunspots were first observed by Galileo in 1610. An image of the Sun can be
produced on a screen when sunlight is passed through a very small hole made in a
piece of cardboard. (This is easily done as a class exercise.) The number of sunspots
present goes through a cycle that is, on average, 11 years long (see Fig. 20.12). The
time between peak sunspot activity has varied in the past from 9 to 13 years. In
293
No. of sunspots
No. of sunspots
300
200
100
0
1760
300
200
100
0
1880
1780
1900
1800
1820
Year
1840
1660
1880
P5
Describes the
scientific principles
employed in
particular areas of
research in physics
TR
Remote sensing
It is not possible to make direct measurements of conditions on the Suns surface.
Temperatures, magnetic fields and other conditions must be monitored and
observed from a distance by remote sensing using instruments on Earth, in orbit
around the Earth and the Sun, and on board space probes sent flying past the Sun.
In the past few decades the improvements in technology and the investments made
in space probes have resulted in a vast leap in observations by remote sensing
techniques.
Hypothesising
The conditions on the Suns surface are not found anywhere on Earth. We cannot
replicate them accurately, and therefore they cant be investigated closely. To explain
the observations made, theories and hypothesise need to be made based on known
294
Models
Models used to explain the development of sunspots are developed that fit in with
theories, hypotheses and nuclear physics knowledge applied to the whole of the
Sun, not just its surface. The entanglement of magnetic field lines originating from
beneath the Suns surface and extending well into space go a long way in explaining
sunspots. There are still gaps in the model but as research in this fascinating field
progresses, the models we have may be modified and refined to incorporate the
missing pieces.
USEFUL WEBSITES:
Sun science:
http://cse.ssl.berkeley.edu/hessi_epo/html/sun.html
>WWW
Sunspot history:
http://cse.ssl.berkeley.edu/SEGwayed/lessons/sunspots/
CSIRO Sunspot resources:
http://www.csiro.au/resources/ps2ac.html
Todays space weather:
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/today.html
When the charged particles that make up the solar wind enter the region of space influenced
by the Earths magnetic field, they are deflected towards the polar regions. Figure 20.9
shows their spiral paths towards the north and south magnetic poles. This flow changes
the magnetic field of the Earth on the surface, which in turn can induce voltages in long
wires such as those used to transmit electricity over large distances. Automatic safeguards
that protect electricity transmission grids from being overloaded may be triggered, cutting
off power supplies to whole regions. Such an event occurred with little or no warning in the
north-east of the United States and south-eastern region of Canada in 1989 during a solar
flare event. The Hydro-Quebec power transmission system was shut down, causing over six
million people to have their electricity supply cut.
Satellite communications may also be affected directly and indirectly by solar flare events.
The stream of charged particles may induce voltages in satellite electronics that can overload
and even destroy the delicate components that are used. Additionally, the interaction of the
particles in the solar wind with the ionosphere produces radio wave energy that may swamp
the weak signals being sent by satellites. The GPS operations are particularly vulnerable, as
the satellite signals are very weak once they reach Earths surface.
secondary
source
investigation
PFA
P3, 4, 5
physics skills
11.1 A, B, D, E
12.3 AE
12.4 A, C, D, E, F
14.1 A, B, F, G, H
14.2 A, C, D
295
Solar flare activity is now closely monitored by a number of satellites, including SOHO
and RHESSI (see Fig. 20.13). Even a few hours notice of a solar storm will give the
operators of satellites and power grids time to take protective action.
Figure 20.13 The RHESSI solar flare observatory,
launched in 2002 to photograph and monitor solar
flare activity
WWW<
USEFUL WEBSITES:
A solar flare event in October 2003:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solar_flare_031028.html
How GSP navigation satellites might be affected by solar flares:
http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Sept06/solar.flares.gps.TO.html
The RHESSI satellite observatory:
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0203/29rhessi/
How solar flares may disrupt GPS in 2011:
http://technology.newscientist.com/article/dn10189-solar-flares-will-disrupt-gps-in-2011.html
Reports of the solar flare event in October 2003:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3223739.stm
NOAA magazine article:
http://www.magazine.noaa.gov/stories/mag131.htm
Resources useful for this activity:
http://www.solarstorms.org/
296
4. If electrons do not exist in the nucleus, how do beta particles come from here?
5. (a) What constitutes the solar wind?
(b) How fast does the solar wind travel through space?
(c) From where does the solar wind originate?
6. Why do sunspots appear dark?
7. Identify two phenomena that vary with the solar cycle.
8. A coronal mass ejection has just struck the Earths magnetic field. Describe the events
that might be observed from the Earths surface over the next few hours.
(a) Sketch the arrangement of the Universe that was proposed by this model.
(b) State how the model proposed that the heavenly bodies were being held in place.
(c) Outline any limitations of the model.
(d) Compare the model to the accepted present-day model of the Universe.
2. Describe how the models of the Universe changed over time with advances in available
technology.
3. (a) Describe the observations made by Hubble that led to the confirmation of the
become (with every other factor held constant) if its brightness were to increase to
64 units?
12. Describe the changes to the brightness of star when your spaceship moves from
297