Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
a OnceGenerator
Associate Profes:;o,,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, Mas::"
Assoc. Mem. ASM.::
Introduction
The thermal-hydraulic transients of the steam generator are
essential in the study of the overall system performance of both
nuclear and fossil-fueled power plants as well as for the design
of their appropriate control systems. These transients are described here by a nonlinear dynamic model of the steam generator.
For efficient digital simulation of the overall system, the steam
generator model should be optimized for computation cost and
accuracy. Fine mesh models [1, 2]2 give good representation of
the system dynamics at the cost of increased model complexity
and require a relatively small iteration time step for numerical
stability and convergence of the solution. To circumvent this
problem, a nonlinear dynamic model of the once-through subcritical steam generator [3] was formulated using the concept of
time-varying phase boundaries. This concept was first introduced
by Adams et al. [4], for analog simulation of a linearized model of
such a steam generator.
The basic model equations were derived form the integral
forms of the fundamental equations of conservation of mass,
momentum, and energy [.5, 6] through the control volume approach. The numerical results for the transient response of
selected system variables were obtained by simulating the set
of nonlinear differential and algebraic equations on an IBM
370 computer using Continuous System Modeling Program
(CSMP III) [7].
The method of analysis and study of numerical stability and
System Description
The once-through subcritical steam generator considered in
this analysis is typical of those used in gas-cooled nuclear power
plants. It consists of a large number of helically coiled tubes of
vertical orientation. Each tube was treated as a counterflow heat
exchanger. Hot gas (primary coolant) is circulated through the
shell of the steam generator from the top, and compressed water
(secondary coolant) is pumped through the steam generator
tubes from the bottom. Thermal energy from the primary
coolant (gas) is transferred to the secondary coolant (water/
steam) through the tube walls. The exchange of thermal energy
results in the cooling of the hot gas on the shell side of steam
generator and production of superheated steam on the tube side.
The model was based on the performance of a typical tube
shown schematically in Fig. l(a).
Assumptions
The fundamental assumption of this study was that the distributed parameter process can be represented by a lumped parameter model using the concept of control volumes. In addition, the following assumptions were made:
(a) Uniform fluid properties over any cross-section.
(b) Uniform and independent heat fluxes across the tube wall
1 Now
COLD PRIMARY
HOT PRIMARY
COOLANT OUTLET
COOLANT INLET
FEEDWATER PRESSURE
PRIMARY COOLANT
AT INLET
FLOW RATE
ONCE-THROUGH
FEEDWATER FLOW
PRIMARY COOLANT
SUBCRITICAL STEAM
GENERATOR MODEL
RATE
INLET TEMPERATURE
INLET
FEEDWATER ENTHALPY
STEAM PRESSURE AT
FEEOWATER
AT INLET
OUTLET HEADER
PRIMARY COOLANT
OUTLET TEMPERATURE
OTHER INTERMEDIATE
OUTPUT VARIABLES
Il
OUTLET STEAM
TEMPERATURE
OUTLET STEAM
FLOW RATE
LEGEND
ARROW ENTERING THE MODEL-INPUT VARIABLE
LEGEND
NODE
NODE
NODE
NODE
NODE
NODE
NODE
I- FEEDWAT~R ENTRY
2- AVERAGE POINT FOR ECONOMIZER
3- ECONOMIZER/EVAPORATOR BOUNDARY
4-AVERAGE POINT FOR EVAPORATOR
5-EVAPORATOR/SUPERHEATER BOUNDARY
6- AVERAGE POINT FOR SUPERHEATER
7- SUPERHEATER OUTLET
Fig. l(b)
NOTES
I NODES 2,3,4,5, AND 6 ARE TIMEVARYING; NODES I AND 7 ARE FIXED
2.. 7 STEAM
found to be negligible:
+ padl1a/dt
(1)
Evaporator
+ psdl15jdt
(2)
Superheater
d(p6ls1) I dt
(3)
where
dl1s
dt
dlta
dt
dlas
+ dt
Evaporator
d(p4u4las)/dt = (Waha - Wshs
+ Q4)jA
- pahadltafdt
+ pshsdl1s/dt
(5)
----Nomenclature,..............................................................................._ ................_________________
A
K'mt
KpT
ltm
l
Q0
Q
ri
r0
rm
Evaporator
Superheater
+ Qo)/A
(6)
(13)
d(psu 6ls1)jdt
dbjdt
= [
+ Q,)jp,
(W5hs - W1h1
wl - Wa -
]/[A (
- pshsdl15/dt
( apz )
(Wl(hl - Uz) - Wa(ha - Uz)
auz pz
u,)) J
(p,
(7)
where
dpz
+ pa(ha
+ Qz)/ A
- Uz)dlla/dt]j(pzlla)
(8)
In the pressure range of interest (i.e., close to the critical pressure), the thermodynamic properties of water/steam mixture
reveal that the partial derivative of specific internal energy
with respect to pressure changes sign monotonically between
0 and 100 percent quality. Thus, U4 was not chosen as a state
variable as it cannot be analytically formulated to represent
the lumped characteristics of the evaporator. Consequently,
l1s was chosen as a state variable and du4jdt was computed as a
weighted average of the derivatives of fluid properties at the
evaporator exit boundary and economizer average point.
For the superheater, equations (3) and (6) yield
du6jdt
Q6)/A
(10)
which yields
dp5jdt
[(Wa - W1)/ A
+ (p5
- pa)dlla/dl]/(la5
+ ls7)
(11)
(14)
where
Co
= (ro
+ ri)/2
Evaporator
Economizer
(16)
Superheater
(12)
(17)
The rates of heat transfer between the tube wall and the secondary coolant for the three regions were calculated as
Economizer
(18)
where
where
Evaporator
and
Y4)
+ 2Y4Tm4 + Y
Yz)
2YzTm2
dlas/dt]j(1
Y4)
(28)
Y 0 dlls/dt]j(1
Yz)
(29)
Y2
(19)
Superheater
Qs = Ad57(Tms- Ts)/[KrntsVV7-o.B8
+ Ci]
(20)
'I'ma
T m5
+ l1a'I'rn4)/l1s
(ls1T m4 + Zas'I'rns)/(la5 + l51)
=
(21)
(lss'I'mz
(22)
Aulla/[2(K0 rnzG-o. 66
+ Co)GCp]
Evaporator
dTm4
dt
(24)
Superheater
dTm6
dt = (Qos- Q6)/(Crnl57)
+ ((Trn6
(25)
Primary Coolant. The dynamic terms in the continuity equations were not considered because the fluid at low linear velocity
was treated as incompressible. Further, the pressure drops due
to acceleration and friction were neglected since they are insignificant in comparison to the absolute pressure of the primary
coolant.
In the superheater, the energy equation for the primary
coolan't can be expressed as
(26)
For a linear temperature profile along the length of steam
generator tube, the average temperatures '1'0 s, T 04, and '1'02 of
the primary coolant were computed as arithmetic means of the
end point temperatures for each of the three regions.
Combining equations (17) and (26), and using the relation
'l'os = ( '1'01 + '1'0 s)/2 yields
Ta5 = ['1'0 7(1
Ys)
+ 2Ys'I'rns-
Y 0 dl1s/dt]j(1
Ys)
(27)
where
and
Yo = (CP -
(
\
Table 1
Physical dimensions, heat balance data, and steady state model performance
I. D.
349ft
106.375 m
0.06083 ft
0.01854 m
O.D.
rate
Process variables
lb/sec
kg/sec
Btujlbm
vV-sec/kg
Btu/lbm
W-sec/kg
ft
m
ft
m
ft
m
psi a
N/m2
psi a
Njm2
psi a
Njm2
psi a
N/m2
hl
h7
Zta
ln~
Zo7
pl
Pa
p5
p7
OF
Tot
T 01
oc
OF
oc
Wt
lbm/sec
kg/sec
50%
rate
Model results
Model results
Remarks
2.19
0.9934
347.0
0. 80693e + 06
1422.5
3. 30793e + 06
176.0
53.645
82.0
24.994
91.0
27.737
2848.0
288.57e + 06
2818t0
285.53e + 06
2744.0
278.03e + 06
2600.0
253.45e + 06
623.6
328.67
1247.3
675.17
1.577
0. 7153
2.19
0.9934
347.0
0. 80693e + 06
1422.6
3.30813e + 06
175.94
53.627
81.78
24.927
91.28
27.822
2847.5
288.52e + 06
2817.3
285.46e + 06
2743.6
278.00e + 06
2600.0
253.45e + 06
623.64
328.69
1247.3
675.17
1.577
0.7153
1.235
0.5602
293.4
0. 68228e + 06
1422.5
3. 30793e + 06
172.0
52.426
90.0
27.432
87.0
26.518
2536.0
256.96e + 06
2524.0
255. 74e + 06
2500.0
253.3le + 06
2462.0
249.46e + 06
562.6
294.78
1140.4
615.78
0.785
0.3561
1.235
0.5602
293.4
0. 68228e + 06
1424.2
3.3119e + 06
173.7
52.944
90.38
27.548
84.92
25.884
2533.8
256. 74e + 06
2521.7
255.51e + 06
2498.3
253.14e + 06
2462.0
249.46e + 06
561.68
294.27
1140.4
615.78
0.785
0.3561
Model
Input
Model
Input
~4 FEEDW~TER
RUN
84 _INLET FLOW-
~~~
57
183
80
55
1LL..
(/)
a::
I.J.J
177
1-
:::E
53
J:
1(!)
w
__J
1-
w
w
LL..
76
~ '-\
~
Model
Input
Model
Input
)
25
RUN #I-PRIMARY
COOLANT FLOW ......_
'
w
__J
...J
(/)
r---
72
51
a::
ll.'
1-
1\
23
~
~
J:
('
(!)
24
J:
1-
26
RLN #5 FJEDWATER
INLET ENTHALPY~
~LET TEMPERATURE_
J:
G
z
171
Model
Input
189
w
w
0.08333 ft
0.02534 m
fl
122
(!)
i'5
__J
21
68
20
64
0
20
40
60
80
100
Tl ME IN SECONDS
Fig. 2 Economizer length transients due to 5 percent independent
step increases in 5 input variables at 100 percent load (run #'s 1-5)
20
40
60
80
100
TIME IN SECONDS
Fig. 3 Evaporator length transients due to 5 percent independent
step increases in 5 input variables at 100 percent load (run #'s 15)
3020
116
20.7
34
108
2980
32
....w
30
Q.
::!:
28
92
...J
20.3
2940
(!)
:::>
Cl)
Cl)
...J
Q
RUN #2-PRIMARY COOLANT
Cl:
RUN #1-PRIMlRY
COOLANT FLOW
2860
~#5-FEEPWATER
-~
I
INLET
~
76
20
40
60
100
80
20
40
60
20.1
~
w
19.9
f3
a::
Cl)
Q.
I9.7
ENTHALPY'
I ~
2820
TIME IN SECONDS
1-
Q.
"'::::iE
;z
CD
Cl:
1-
(!)
(/)
:I:
1-
....ww
:I:
20.5
Cl:
w 100
IJ..
['\.
(/)
I9.5
I
80
100
j,
,t
TIME IN SECONDS
7925
I.84
RUN #3-0UTLET STEAM
HEADER PRESSURE-...,_
(\
787.5
I.83
...J
(/)
I
7825
I.82
(1)
...J
<(
3:
<D
>a..
......
(.)
w
::z
(1)
......
::::>
1-
(!)
I .81
7775
RUN #2- PRIMARY COOLANT
INLET TEMPERATURE,---,..
:I:
1-
...J
<(
:I:
~UN
w
772.5
I.80
#I-PRIMARY
OOLANT FLOW---.
'~ ;:5-FEEDWlTER
\../';;
INLJT
>a..
ENTHALPY~
1-
I.79
767:5
20
40
60
80
100
TIME IN SECONDS
590
1065
r-... /""""
1060
I~
570
1060
LL
(.)
0
w
Cl
0
w
550 Cl
1020
w
a::
~
a::
w
Q.
530
980
(1)
!;;t
>a..
a::
w
...J
::!:
1-
1-
1--
...J
......
Q.
::!:
510
940
"'
(1)
w
a::
:::>
:::>
::!:
::::>
1-
<(
1055
RUN #4-FEEDWATER /
INLET FLOW
RUN #5-FEEDWATER
INLET ENTHALPY
(!)
RUN ~I-PRIMARY/
COOLjNT FLOW
......
2.46
l.aJ
20
40
60
80
100
Tl ME IN SECONDS
3:
CD
2.45
Q
~
2.44
:I:
>a..
...J
<(
:I:
1-
v
0
l.aJ
2.43
1040
0
(.)
(/)
#2~PRIMAR~ COOLANL~,;I
RUN
INLET TEMPERATURE
1045
900
2.47
1050
490
20
40
60
80
2.42
100
TIME IN SECONDS
195
0.87
/7 COOLANT
RUN #I-PRIMARY/
FLOW
165
~
Cl
(..)
IJJ
135
0.74
J
Cl
+ R U N #5- FEEDWATER
C/)
.......
Ill
C)
~
HEADER PRESSURE
_J
z
&3
C/)
......
:::l:
I/
0.48
L05
3:
0
3:
_J
LL
_J
LL
0.75
20
40
60
80
0.35
Acknowledgments
0.22
100
TIME IN SECONDS
References
the steam generator (Fig..5) increases initially due to the drop
in steam flow rate and then relaxes back close to the original
value as the rate of energy input to the system and the feed water
flow rate are unchanged. All the system transients for the perturbation of outlet steam header pressure completely decay within
20 s. The re::;ponse times for this run are faster than those for
runs. Nos. 1 and 2 because the disturbance, in this case, is hydraulic whereas those for runs Nos. 1 and 2 were thermal.
Run No. 4 shows the system responses for a 5 percent step increase in feedwater flow rate with the other 4 input variables
held constant. Steam flow out of the steam generator (Fig. 9) is
unresponsive to the increased feedwater flow rate for a period of
approximately 2 s, and essentially equals the increased feedwater flow ra.te within 50 s. For constant primary coolant flow
rate and inlet temperature, the temperature at all points in the
secondary water/steam path drops due to the increased feedwater flow rate. Consequently, the lengths of economizer and
evaporator (Figs. 2 and 3) increase and the length of superheater
(Fig. 4) decreases. The inlet feedwater pressure (Fig. 6) increases
initially due to a larger pressure drop across the steam generator
caused by the increase in feedwater flow rate. Subsequently, the
decrease in superheater length (Fig. 4) overcompensates for the
increase in feedwater flow rate and the inlet feedwater pressure
asymptotically approaches a value slightly lower than its initial
value. The coupled hydraulic/thermal transients observed here
have response times which are intermediate between the thermal
transients of runs Nos. 1 and 2 and the hydraulic transients of
run No.3.
Run No. 5 shows the system transient responses for a 5 percent
step increase in inlet feedwater enthalpy with the other 4 input
variables held constant. Each process variable (Figs. 2-9) displays an initial reverse oscillation with a subsequent asymptotic
behavior. Probably, these oscillations in the model results are
generated due to extrapolation of enthalpy (h3 ) of saturated water
from inlet and average point enthalpies (h1 and hz) in the economizer. However, the long term transients of the process variables
can be justified for an increased thermal energy input to the
secondary coolant circuit at the economizer inlet. These transients are of the order of 60 s, reflecting the effect of thermal
transport delay and thermal/hydraulic time lag.
APPENDIX
Summary of Equation Set Constituting the
Mathematical Model
The following differential equations identify the selected state
variables as l1a, uz, l15, 1tG, p5, T m2, T m4, Tm6, and h1, respectively:
dl1a =
dt
W1
Wa -
apz
~a
U2
- W, (hr, - u,)
[ A ( po - p;
duz
dt
dl15
~onclusions
dt =
+ Qo)/{)2
+ (po/Po) (
JI
: : ) Po (ho - Uo) )
+ Qz)/A
U4) -
Ws (hs -
U4)
- U4))
dt
T 0 1 = (T0 a (1- Yz
T0 i
= (Qo4- Q4)/(Cm las)+ ((Tms- Tm4)/(las + Zs7)) dl1s/dt
+ ((Tm4
Tm4
Y 0 dlas/dt)/(1
Y4)
where Yz
dTm4
+ 2 Y4
T mz)/Zls) dl1a/dt
+ 2 Yz
Tmz
Y 0 dlla/dt)/(1
Yz)
= (T
0 ci-1)
Ta(i+l))/2, i
2, 4, 6
The following process variables were obtained by thermodynamic state relationship and/or averaging interpolation/
extrapolation:
dh = (hrw- h1)/(AZ1apz/(2WI))wherehrwisfeedwaterenthalpy
dt
Wa
h2, p2, Tz
W1 =
ha
V (Ps -
Ws = (Wa
P1 - Ps gls1 sin
las + ls1
Pa, pa, Ta
where G\
Q4
= (T 0 1 (1
Ys)
+ Ci)
- Y 0 dhs/dt)/(1
= f(h4, P4)
=
au )
A vi ( du2,
dt ' ( 8p
X=l
dps )
dt
f( ) indicates a function
Avi( ) indicates value obtained by averaging
interpolation
+ C,)
+ 2 YsTms
P4
du4
dt
where
+ Co)
[riln (rm/ri)1/km
U4
T4
= f(ha)
Qz
Psi (IS..rsls1)
(a constant)
Qos
= f(uz)
Ys)
~\
Printed in U.S:A{