Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
International Research Center for Solar-Hydrogen Renewable and Clean Energy, State Key Laboratory of
Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xian Jiaotong University, Shaanxi 710049, China
2
Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and Department of
Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
*
shshen_xjtu@mail.xjtu.edu.cn
Received 22 Nov 2011; revised 13 Jan 2012; accepted 13 Jan 2012; published 9 Mar 2012
12 March 2012 / Vol. 20, No. S2 / OPTICS EXPRESS A351
16. T. Ishii, H. Kato, and A. Kudo, H2 evolution from an aqueous methanol solution on SrTiO3 photocatalysts
codoped with chromium and tantalum ions under visible light irradiation, J. Photochem. Photobiol. 163(1-2),
181186 (2004).
17. Z. Zheng, B. Huang, X. Qin, X. Zhang, and Y. Dai, Facile synthesis of SrTiO3 hollow microspheres built as
assembly of nanocubes and their associated photocatalytic activity, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 358(1), 6872
(2011).
18. D. K. Lee, I. S. Cho, D. K. Yim, J. H. Noh, K. S. Hong, and D. W. Kim, Synthesis and photoactivity of heteronanostructured SrTiO3, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 118(1382), 876880 (2010).
19. J. Zhang, J. H. Bang, C. Tang, and P. V. Kamat, Tailored TiO2-SrTiO3 heterostructure nanotube arrays for
improved photoelectrochemical performance, ACS Nano 4(1), 387395 (2010).
20. J. W. Liu, G. Chen, Z. H. Li, and Z. G. Zhang, Electronic structure and visible light photocatalysis water
splitting property of chromium-doped SrTiO3, J. Solid State Chem. 179(12), 37043708 (2006).
21. H. W. Kang and S. B. Park, H2 evolution under visible light irradiation from aqueous methanol solution on
SrTiO3:Cr/Ta prepared by spray pyrolysis from polymeric precursor, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36(16), 9496
9504 (2011).
22. S. W. Liu, C. Li, J. G. Yu, and Q. J. Xiang, Improved visible-light photocatalytic activity of porous carbon selfdoped ZnO nanosheet-assembled flowers, CrystEngComm 13(7), 25332541 (2011).
23. J. Shi, J. Ye, Z. Zhou, M. Li, and L. Guo, Hydrothermal synthesis of Na(0.5)La(0.5)TiO3-LaCrO3 solid-solution
single-crystal nanocubes for visible-light-driven photocatalytic H2 evolution, Chemistry 17(28), 78587867
(2011).
24. J. W. Liu, G. Chen, Z. H. Li, and Z. G. Zhang, Hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalytic properties of ATaO3
and ANbO3 (A = Na and K), Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32(13), 22692272 (2007).
25. Y. Lee, T. Watanabe, T. Takata, M. Hara, M. Yoshimura, and K. Domen, Hydrothermal synthesis of fine
NaTaO3 powder as a highly efficient photocatalyst for overall water splitting, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 80(2), 423
428 (2007).
1. Introduction
Solar-driven water splitting for hydrogen production using semiconductor-based
photocatalysts has attracted a significant amount of attention from both the fundamental
science point of view and the potential as a clean energy solution. Since Fujishima and
Hondas pioneering work in 1972 [1], different classes of semiconductor materials, such as
metal oxides as best represented by TiO2, have been developed and evaluated as potential
candidate photocatalysts for high-efficiency solar-driven hydrogen conversion [2,3].
Considering that UV light consists of only a small portion (~4%) of the solar spectrum, the
energy conversion efficiency for solar-hydrogen water splitting using TiO2 as the
photocatalyst is typically <1%, which is limited to largely by TiO2s wide band gap (~3.0 eV)
[4]. To enhance light absorption in the visible range of the solar spectrum, TiO2 has been
disorder engineered [5] or doped by various metal or nonmetal ions that yield narrowed band
gaps [6]. On the other hand, TiO2 often underwent nanostructure design to create a
hierarchical assembly, such as sphere-in-sphere structure [7,8] and spiny mesoporous tubular
structure [9], aimed for more efficient light harvesting through multiple optical scattering or
reflection.
A variation of Ti-based metal oxide, SrTiO3, which has a band gap of ~3.2 eV, is able to
split water into H2 and O2 under UV irradiation. Visible light response has been reported
when SrTiO3 was doped or co-doped with transition metal ions, such as Rh3+, Pt4+, Cr3+, Ni2+,
and Sb5+ [1015]. In general, charge balance is important for doped or co-doped SrTiO3 as a
photocatalyst to reduce the chance of electron-hole recombination. It was suggested that codoping SrTiO3 with Ta5+ and Cr3+ ions might benefit as the formation of Cr6+ ions and oxygen
defects that would act as non-radiative recombination centers for photogenerated charges
should be suppressed [16]. Suppression of non-radiative recombination usually results in high
photocatalytic activities. However, (Cr3+, Ta5+) co-doped SrTiO3 synthesized through solidstate reactions had a induction period for photocatalytic H2 production, even after high
temperature reduction under H2 environment, indicating the existence of Cr6+ ions in the
material [16]. Alternatively, metal oxide-based photocatalysts synthesized by hydrothermal
and sol-gel methods usually exhibit higher photocatalytic activities, presumably owing to
factors such as better crystallinity, larger surface area, and charge-transfer favored
nanostructure [2,3,1719].
In the present study, (Cr, Ta) co-doped SrTiO3 tubular structures were developed through
a two-step solvothermal-hydrothermal process. The materials were investigated for their
Received 22 Nov 2011; revised 13 Jan 2012; accepted 13 Jan 2012; published 9 Mar 2012
12 March 2012 / Vol. 20, No. S2 / OPTICS EXPRESS A352
capacity of photocatalytic hydrogen production under visible light. The oxidation states of Cr
ions and their effects on photocatalytic H2 production were discussed, which were compared
to similar co-doped materials synthesized through solid-state reaction.
2. Experimental
2.1 Synthesis of (Cr, Ta) co-doped SrTiO3 tubular structures
In the first step, tubular (Cr, Ta) co-doped TiO2 was prepared by a solvothermal approach [9].
Typically, approximately 4.6 g of TiOSO4xH2SO4xH2O, as the Ti source, together with 0.31
g of Cr(NO3)39H2O and 0.28 g of TaCl5, with an elemental ratio of Ti: Cr: Ta = 0.96: 0.04:
0.04, were dispersed in a mixed solution of absolute ethanol (40.0 g), ethyl ether (16.62 g) and
ethylene glycerol (27.01 g) under stirring. The resulted green dispersion was transferred into a
Teflon autoclave followed by solvothermal treatment at 110 C for 48 h. After filtering and
washing with water, the dried precipitation was annealed in air at 550 C or 900 C with
ramping rate of 1 C/min to obtain crystallized (Cr, Ta) co-doped TiO2 that have a tubular
structure, denoted as T-550 and T-900, respectively.
In the second step, T-550 and T-900 were hydrothermally reacted with excessive Sr(OH)2
at 250 C for 1248 h to synthesize the final tubular (Cr, Ta) co-doped SrTiO3 products (Sr:
Ti = 10: 1). Process parameters for samples denoted as ST-01, ST-02 and ST-03 are given in
Table 1.
Table 1. Information of the Final Tubular (Cr, Ta) Co-Doped SrTiO3 Products (ST-01,
ST-02 and ST-03).
Second-step hydrothermal process
Final
products
ST-01
T-550
ST-02
T-550
250
48
ST-03
T-900
250
24
Temperature (C)
Time (h)
250
12
As a reference, (Cr, Ta) co-doped SrTiO3 was also synthesized through a solid-state
reaction followed by H2 reduction [16]. Stoichiometric mixture of SrCO3, TiO2, Cr2O3 and
Ta2O5 was calcined at 1050 C for 20 h in air. The ramping rate was 1 C/min. Then H2
reduction treatment at 500 C was performed on the oxide precursor in order to obtain (Cr,
Ta) co-doped SrTiO3, which was denoted as ST-SSR.
2.2 Characterization
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples were obtained from a PANalytical Xpert
MPD Pro diffractometer using Ni-filtered Cu K irradiation (1.5406 ). The patterns of
powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) in the 2 range from 10.0 to 80.0 were collected (40 kV,
40 mA; real-time multiple strip (RTMS) detector, X'Celerator) with a scan step size of
0.0334 and counting time of 19.685 s. A divergence slit of 1, antiscatter slit of 2, and a
0.04 radian Soller slit were used in the incident beam path, whereas a 6.6 mm antiscatter slit
and a 0.04 radian Soller slit were used in the diffracted beam path. X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were conducted on a Kratos spectrometer (AXIS Ultra
DLD) with monochromatic Al K radiation (h = 1486.69 eV) and with a concentric
hemispherical analyzer working at 15 kV and 8 mA, and with the pressure of sample analysis
chamber under high vacuum (< 3109 Torr). Both survey-scan (pass energy 160 eV, step size
1000 meV) and high-resolution (pass energy 40 eV, step size 50 meV) spectra of X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were obtained with an analysis area of 300700 m and
with charge corrected to C 1s line of adventitious carbon set to 284.8 eV. UV-Vis absorption
spectra were recorded by a Hitachi U-4100 UVvisnear-IR spectrometer under diffuse
reflectance (DR) mode with BaSO4 as the reference. Sample morphology was examined by a
JEOL JSM-6700FE scanning electron microscope with accelerating voltage of 15 kV. The
BrunauerEmmettTeller (BET) surface areas of samples were deduced from N2 adsorption-
Received 22 Nov 2011; revised 13 Jan 2012; accepted 13 Jan 2012; published 9 Mar 2012
12 March 2012 / Vol. 20, No. S2 / OPTICS EXPRESS A353
Fig. 1. SEM images of crystallized tubular (Cr, Ta)-codoped TiO2, (a,b) T-550 and (c,d) T-900.
Figure 2 shows SEM images of the final tubular (Cr, Ta) co-doped SrTiO3 materials. As
seen in Figs. 2a-2d, ST-01 and ST-02 samples exhibit similar morphology, which keeps the
tubular structure like the tubular T-550 template. The walls of the tubes were not
characterized by spiny surface, but self-assembled nanoparticles with diameters of 4060 nm
Received 22 Nov 2011; revised 13 Jan 2012; accepted 13 Jan 2012; published 9 Mar 2012
12 March 2012 / Vol. 20, No. S2 / OPTICS EXPRESS A354
(Figs. 2b and 2d). The ST-03 sample that was hydrothermally templated from T-900 also
keeps the tubular structure (Fig. 2e), but with the wall of the tubes comprised of uniform
cubes with side length of approximately 150 nm (Fig. 2f).
Fig. 2. SEM images of the final tubular (Cr, Ta)-codoped SrTiO3 products, (a,b) ST-01, (c,d)
ST-02, and (e,f) ST-03.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to characterize the structures of the crystallized tubular
(Cr, Ta) co-doped TiO2 (T-550 and T-900). As shown in Fig. 3, XRD patterns of T-550 and
T-900 could be indexed to anatase and rutile TiO2, respectively. The broadening of the
reflections in the XRD pattern of T-550 indicated its poor crystallinity with small crystallites
on the nanometer scale, while the intense XRD peaks of T-900 implied its good crystallinity
and large crystallites, which are resulted from higher annealing temperature. The crystallite
sizes of T-550 and T-900 calculated from the peak at ca. 25.2 and 27.5 using the Scherrer
formula are 9.6 nm and 27.1 nm, respectively. The structure of the final tubular (Cr, Ta) codoped SrTiO3 were also characterized by XRD as shown in Fig. 3. ST-01 and ST-02 have
similar XRD profiles that could be assigned to the pure SiTiO3 phase. No other phases like
unreacted anatase TiO2 were observed. By contrast, ST-03 possesses unreacted rutile TiO2
together with the SrTiO3 product, although it experienced a longer hydrothermal reaction
process than ST-01 (24 h vs. 12 h). By using the normalized RIR (Reference Intensity Ratio)
method, the percentages of rutile (JCPDS No. 01-076-0318, RIR = 3.51) and SrTiO3 (JCPDS
No. 01-079-0174, RIR = 8.15) in ST-03 were determined to be 18.1 and 81.9 wt%,
respectively. This indicated that anatase TiO2 should be easier to react with Sr(OH)2 to form
Received 22 Nov 2011; revised 13 Jan 2012; accepted 13 Jan 2012; published 9 Mar 2012
12 March 2012 / Vol. 20, No. S2 / OPTICS EXPRESS A355
SrTiO3 in hydrothermal condition as compared to rutile TiO2. Additionally, one cannot find
other oxides such as Cr2O3 and Ta2O5.
Fig. 3. XRD patterns of crystallized tubular (Cr, Ta)-codoped TiO2 (T-550 and T-900), and
tubular (Cr, Ta)-codoped SrTiO3 (ST-01, ST-02, and ST-03).
Optical properties of tubular (Cr, Ta) co-doped SrTiO3 products (ST-01, ST-02, and ST03) were characterized with UV-Vis spectra (Fig. 4). ST-01 and ST-02 prepared from T-550
possess similar absorption bands in the visible region, with onsets around 520 nm. The shapes
of UV-Vis spectra were characteristics of metal doping, indicating discontinuous levels
formed by the dopants in the forbidden band [12]. The absorption bands of ST-01 and ST-02
in the visible light region can be attributed to a Cr3+ to Ti4+ charge-transfer transition, which
agrees well with the absorption spectra of SrTiO3 doped with Cr3+ ions [20] or co-doped with
Cr3+ and Ta5+ [21]. ST-03 prepared from T-900 also shows an absorption band in the visible
region due to Cr3+ to Ti4+ charge-transfer transition, but with onset red-shifted to around 550
nm when compared to ST-01 and ST-02. Such a change in the absorption spectra implies the
existence of Cr6+ ions in ST-03 resulted from high temperature annealing of tubular (Cr, Ta)
co-doped TiO2 precursor at 900 C. As shown in the inset of Fig. 4, the color of ST-01 and
ST-02 was gray-green whereas the color of ST-03 was yellow. The color difference gave an
additional clue to the different oxidation states of Cr ions in ST-01, ST-02 and ST-03.
Fig. 4. UV-Vis spectra of the final tubular (Cr, Ta)-codoped SrTiO3 (ST-01, ST-02, and ST-03)
products and (Cr, Ta)-codoped SrTiO3 as reference (ST-SSR).
Received 22 Nov 2011; revised 13 Jan 2012; accepted 13 Jan 2012; published 9 Mar 2012
12 March 2012 / Vol. 20, No. S2 / OPTICS EXPRESS A356
Figure 4 also shows the UV-Vis spectra of ST-SSR as the reference, which was prepared
by a solid-state reaction approach followed by H2 reduction. ST-SSR had broad absorption
bands in the region of 550700 nm, which is quite similar to the (Cr, Ta) co-doped SrTiO3
samples reported in literature [16]. Though it was suggested that Cr6+ involved in SrTiO3
could be suppressed by Ta5+ co-doping or reduced to Cr3+ ions by H2 reduction, there are Cr6+
ions in ST-SSR as deduced from its broader absorption bands in visible region when
compared to those of ST-01, ST-02 and ST-03. Additionally, short wavelength absorption of
ST-01, ST-02 and ST-03 ascribed to the band-to-band transition of SrTiO3 were enhanced due
to the possibility of multiple reflections of trapped light in the tubular structure [8,9,22].
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out to examine the
oxidation states of Cr ions in the tubular (Cr, Ta) co-doped SrTiO3 (ST-01, ST-02, and ST-03)
samples. As shown in Fig. 5, for ST-01 and ST-02 samples the peaks for Cr 2p1/2 and Cr 2p3/2
were obtained at about 586.8 eV and 577.1 eV, respectively, which could be assigned to the
Cr3+ ions [23] in ST-01 and ST-02. No other XPS peak for Cr6+ was observed. In contrast, in
the case of ST-03, the majority of Cr ions were Cr3+, but a small amount of Cr6+ seems to
exist, as detected by the XPS peak at about 580.9 eV. As these tubular (Cr, Ta) co-doped
SrTiO3 (ST-01, ST-02, and ST-03) samples were synthesized from tubular (Cr, Ta) co-doped
TiO2 precursor, the doped Cr3+ (or Cr6+) and Ta5+ ions should locate at the Ti sites.
Fig. 5. XPS spectra of Cr 2p of tubular (Cr, Ta)-codoped SrTiO3 (ST-01, ST-02, and ST-03).
Received 22 Nov 2011; revised 13 Jan 2012; accepted 13 Jan 2012; published 9 Mar 2012
12 March 2012 / Vol. 20, No. S2 / OPTICS EXPRESS A357
This is also the reason why (Sb, Cr) co-doped SrTiO3 was reported to display higher activity
for H2 production than (Sb, Cr) co-doped TiO2 under visible light [15]. Moreover, both ST-01
(19.5 m2/g) and ST-02 (19.1 m2/g) had much higher surface area than ST-03 (2.8 m2/g), as
obtained from BET analysis. The high surface areas could enrich the reactive sites, and also
enhance the adsorption of reactants, thereby accelerate the photocatalytic redox reactions for
hydrogen production. This may be the other reason why ST-03 showed much lower
photocatalytic activity than ST-01 and ST-02.
As the reference, ST-SSR exhibited the lowest photocatalytic activity. Its reasonable to
assume that the hydrothermal method is able to produce photocatalysts with good crystallinity
as well as high surface areas that exhibit higher photocatalytic activity for water splitting than
those synthesized by solid-state reaction [24,25]. The more efficient light harvesting of the
tubular structure due to multi-scattering effect may be another possible reason for the higher
photocatalytic activities of hydrothermally (vs. solid-state reaction) synthesized materials [9].
By checking into the initial stage (~1 h) of photocatalytic reaction, ST-03 showed very low
activity for H2 evolution. After this stage, a considerable H2 evolution rate was obtained. It
was assumed that the Cr6+ ions had been reduced to the Cr3+ ions by photogenerated electrons
during this induction period [11]. In contrast, there was no induction period for photocatalytic
H2 production over ST-01 or ST-02, owing to the absence of Cr6+ ions as revealed by XPS
measurements. The longer induction period (~3 h) of ST-SSR indicated the presence of larger
amount of Cr6+ ions, even after H2 reduction.
Fig. 6. Time courses of visible-light-driven H2 evolution over tubular (Cr, Ta)-codoped SrTiO3
(ST-01, ST-02, and ST-03) and (Cr, Ta)-codoped SrTiO3 as reference (ST-SSR).
4. Conclusion
(Cr, Ta) co-doped SrTiO3 tubular structures were fabricated by a solvothermal-hydrothermal
two-step process. It was found that the tubular (Cr, Ta) co-doped SrTiO3 synthesized using
anatase tubular (Cr, Ta) co-doped TiO2 as the precursor showed higher photocatalytic activity
for hydrogen production than that synthesized from rutile precursor, in which the unreacted
rutile TiO2 with lower conduction band level than SrTiO3 led to weaker driving force for H2
production. XPS measurements revealed the formation of Cr6+ ions, which would work as the
charge recombination centers, could be avoided using the solvothermal-hydrothermal twostep process. The resulted tubular (Cr, Ta) co-doped SrTiO3 exhibited much higher
photocatalytic H2 production activities without an induction period when compared to that
synthesized by the solid-state reaction approach.
Received 22 Nov 2011; revised 13 Jan 2012; accepted 13 Jan 2012; published 9 Mar 2012
12 March 2012 / Vol. 20, No. S2 / OPTICS EXPRESS A358
Acknowledgment
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Nos. 51102194 and 51121092), Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi
Province (No. 2011JQ7017), Doctoral Program of the Ministry of Education (No.
20110201120040) and National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2009CB220000). J.
Shi thanks Prof. J. Ye from National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), Japan for the
help with photocatalytic activity evaluation. S. Shen was supported by the Fundamental
Research Funds for the Central University from Xian Jiaotong University, China.
Additional support was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
Received 22 Nov 2011; revised 13 Jan 2012; accepted 13 Jan 2012; published 9 Mar 2012
12 March 2012 / Vol. 20, No. S2 / OPTICS EXPRESS A359