Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Short communication
CSIRO Division of Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, GPO Box 1085, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia
d
CSIRO Division of Molecular and Health Technologies, Private Bag 10, Clayton, VIC 3169, Australia
b
c
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 22 March 2010
Received in revised form
28 April 2010
Accepted 6 May 2010
Available online 31 May 2010
Herbicide contamination from agriculture is a major issue worldwide, and has been identied as a threat
to freshwater and marine environments in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area in Australia. The
triazine herbicides are of particular concern because of potential adverse effects, both on photosynthetic
organisms and upon vertebrate development. To date a number of bioremediation strategies have been
proposed for triazine herbicides, but are unlikely to be implemented due to their reliance upon the
release of genetically modied organisms. We propose an alternative strategy using a free-enzyme
bioremediant, which is unconstrained by the issues surrounding the use of live organisms. Here we
report an initial eld trial with an enzyme-based product, demonstrating that the technology is technically capable of remediating water bodies contaminated with the most common triazine herbicide,
atrazine.
Crown Copyright 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Chlorohydrolase
Hydrolase
Triazine
Field trial
Herbicide remediation
1. Introduction
Herbicide runoff from agricultural lands is a major issue worldwide. It is of particular concern in the sugar cane growing region
within the Great Barrier Reef catchment area and has been identied
as a threat to receiving freshwater and marine environments (Lewis
et al., 2009). In particular, herbicides designed to inhibit the
photosystem II in plants (e.g. triazines, phenyl ureas) exceed freshwater and marine guidelines during both low ow and event/high
ow conditions (Lewis et al., 2009). These ecosystems include
freshwater wetlands of national or international signicance and
the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (Lewis et al., 2009).
Atrazine, the most commonly used triazine, has been used
extensively since its introduction in 1958 (Tomlin, 2006), and of
particular concern as it has been linked to environmental and
human health problems. Triazine herbicides are toxic to non-target
photosynthetic species, including phototropic bacteria, freshwater
algae, mangrove trees and corals (Bell and Duke, 2005; Jones and
Kerwell, 2003; Lockert et al., 2006; Sutton et al., 1984). In addition, it has been claimed that atrazine may be carcinogenic (Huff,
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 61 2 6246 4090.
E-mail address: colin.scott@csiro.au (C. Scott).
2002; Huff and Sass, 2007), and may cause endocrine dysfunction
in vertebrate species (Hayes et al., 2002). These issues are compounded by atrazines relatively long environmental half-life of
four to fty seven weeks (Belluck et al., 1991) and its high level of
mobility; it has been detected in both surface and ground waters in
several countries (Gavrilescu, 2005; Thurman and Meyer, 1996; van
der Meer, 2006), at concentrations up to 1 ppm.
Several bioremediation strategies have been suggested for
decontaminating atrazine-contaminated water, including the use
of transgenic plants and bacteria (Kawahigashi et al., 2006; Strong
et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2005). However, technical and regulatory
impediments prevent the use of live transgenic organisms in
environmental settings (Watanabe, 2001). Free-enzyme bioremediation is an attractive alternative to the use live organisms, as it is
not constrained by these (Alcalde et al., 2006; Scott et al., 2008;
Sutherland et al., 2004). Indeed, free-enzyme systems are considered to be sufciently safe for use in the clinical treatment of
pesticide poisoning (Bird et al., 2008), and are currently used
commercially for organophosphate insecticide remediation (http://
www.orica-landguard.com/).
Despite the advantages of free-enzyme bioremediation, there
are also constraints, and the requisite characteristics required of
enzymes used in free-enzyme remediation restrict its applicability
0301-4797/$ e see front matter Crown Copyright 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.007
2076
through a 0.22 mM lter to remove intact cells and DNaseI was used
to remove intact DNA. Enzymatic activity was determined at
258 19 mg of atrazine/mg of lysate/using both the UV absorbance
method described by de Souza et al. (1996) and the colorimetric
method described in Scott et al. (2009). The homogenate was stored
at 80 C and thawed at 4 C when required.
2.2. Preparation of test dam
Holding dams are used to collect spent irrigation water so that it
is withheld from entering the catchment, allowing the water to be
reused in farm activities and providing time for pesticide residues
to degrade by biological or photolytic routes. A ca. 1.5 ML holding
dam at a sugar cane farm near Clare (Lat. 19:48, Long. 147:14) in the
dry tropics of Queensland, Australia, was lled with headwater
from irrigation of a eld pre-treated with the recommended dose of
atrazine (3.3 kg per hectare). 240 g of bacterial homogenate was
suspended in 20 L of water, and applied by hand by spreading
evenly across the surface of the holding dam. Duplicate 1 L samples
were taken before the dam was lled with atrazine-contaminated
runoff water, before the enzyme was added and at time intervals
after the addition of the enzyme. Samples were stored immediately
on ice to stop the enzymatic reaction. Samples were frozen after no
more than 4 h on ice.
2.3. Determination of atrazine concentration
Atrazine concentrations were determined at two independent
laboratories; Queensland Health Forensic and Scientic Services
(QHFSS), by the LCMSMS method described in Lewis et al. (2009),
modied to use direct injection; and by CSIRO Entomology by the
following LCMS method. Briey, 100 mL samples were acidied
with HCl to pH 2.8, then the atrazine in the samples was concentrated 1000-fold by solid phase extraction using preconditioned
Oasis SPE Max Cartridges (Waters, USA), and eluted in 3 mL of
MeOH (with ammonia). Samples were subsequently dried and
dissolved in 100 ml of MeOH. Samples were separated by HPLC and
assayed for atrazine concentrations by measuring the absorbance at
265 nm, and the analyte peak area calculated using Analyst software. Replicate samples were within 10% agreement. The identity
of the HPLC peak was conrmed by mass spectrum analysis,
whereby atrazine ions 216 m/z were extracted on an Agilent
ToFeMSD.
3. Results and discussion
The water in the holding dam contained 8e12 mg/L atrazine
before the irrigation tailwater was collected (data not shown). After
lling with irrigation tailwater the atrazine concentration rose to
157e170 mg/L (Fig. 2). There was a lag in the rate of atrazine
depletion after addition of the enzyme, which was most likely
attributable to the rate at which the enzyme mixed with the water
in the holding dam. The duration of the mixing phase for enzyme
applied in this manner is almost certainly dependent on the
volume and surface area:volume ratio of the water body to be
remediated; i.e. larger bodies and those with low surface area:
volume ratios would require a longer mixing phase.
Notwithstanding the lag during the mixing phase, the addition
of the enzyme led to >90% depletion in the concentration of atrazine in the rst four hours after addition. This result suggests that
a TrzN-based bioremediant for triazines is technically feasible,
although the rate of remediation is slow compared with early trials
of the only other enzymatic bioremediant, OpdA. OpdA reduced
methyl-parathion concentrations by 10-fold reduction from
84,000 L in less than 10 min (Russell et al., 2001), 24-fold faster
2077
References
Fig. 2. Depletion of atrazine in a 1.5 ML holding dam over 10.5 h after addition of TrzN.
Samples analysed by QHFSS (Squares), and CSIRO Entomology (Circles).
than TrzN removed atrazine in this trial. However, OpdA was dosed
into a smaller volume of owing water, which almost certainly
improved the rate of mixing of the enzyme and its performance
overall.
OpdA is an exceptional enzyme, and catalyses methyl-parathion
hydrolysis at near diffusion limited rates (ca. 7000 mg methyl
parathion/second/mg of OpdA) (Jackson et al., 2008). TrzN has
a considerably slower turnover rate (ca. 13 mg atrazine/second/mg
TrzN) (Shapir et al., 2005), and so greater quantities of TrzN are
required to obtain rates of atrazine hydrolysis comparable to those
obtained with OpdA-mediated methyl-parathion hydrolysis. If
required, the rate of atrazine hydrolysis by TrzN could be improved
by directed evolution, in the manner that has been reported for
AtzA (Scott et al., 2009).
4. Conclusion
The reduction of herbicide runoff from agricultural lands is a key
component of the Reef Water Quality Protection Plan (RWQPP) for
the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (Anon, 2003) and
herbicide management is thus a major consideration of regionally
developed Best Management Practices through Water Quality
Improvement Plans/Reef Rescue programs in response to the
RWQPP. The commercial development and application of enzyme
products to remove herbicide residues before they enter waterways
of the Great Barrier Reef catchment area provide an alternative
strategy to reduce herbicide runoff and thus reduce their potential
impact to receiving water environs. This application may also allow
sugar cane growers and horticulturalists to continue using products
such as atrazine to maintain productivity requirements. Moreover,
this enzyme has broader applications for the removal of atrazine
from contaminated surface and ground waters around the world.
Further eld trials will be required to more accurately gauge what is
required to make this technically successful remediation technology commercially viable.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Wayne Dal Santo for allowing us to use
his farm in this eld trial, and Simon Christen at QHFSS for helpful
discussions.
Alcalde, M., Ferrer, M., Plou, F.J., Ballesteros, A., 2006. Environmental biocatalysis:
from remediation with enzymes to novel green processes. Trends Biotechnol.
24, 281e287.
Belluck, D.A., Benjamin, S.L., Dawson, T., 1991. Groundwater Contamination by
Atrazine and Its Metabolites e Risk Assessment, Policy, and Legal Implications,
vol. 459, pp. 254e273.
Gavrilescu, M., 2005. Fate of pesticides in the environment and its bioremediation.
Eng. Life Sci. 5, 497e526.
Kawahigashi, H., Hirose, S., Ohkawa, H., Ohkawa, Y., 2006. Phytoremediation of
the herbicides atrazine and metolachlor by transgenic rice plants expressing human CYP1A1, CYP2B6, and CYP2C19. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54,
2985e2991.
Lockert, C.K., Hoagland, K.D., Siegfried, B.D., 2006. Comparative sensitivity of
freshwater algae to atrazine. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol 76, 73e79.
Lofer, F.E., Edwards, E.A., 2006. Harnessing microbial activities for environmental
cleanup. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17, 274e284.
Mulbry, W.W., Zhu, H., Nour, S.M., Topp, E., 2002. The triazine hydrolase gene trzN
from Nocardioides sp strain C190: cloning and construction of gene-specic
primers. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 206, 75e79.
Raillard, S., Krebber, A., Chen, Y.C., Ness, J.E., Bermudez, E., Trinidad, R., Fullem, R.,
Davis, C., Welch, M., Seffernick, J., Wackett, L.P., Stemmer, W.P.C., Minshull, J.,
2001. Novel enzyme activities and functional plasticity revealed by recombining
highly homologous enzymes. Chem. Biol. 8, 891e898.
Seffernick, J.L., Johnson, G., Sadowsky, M.J., Wackett, L.P., 2000. Substrate specicity
of atrazine chlorohydrolase and atrazine-catabolizing bacteria. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 66, 4247e4252.
Shapir, N., Rosendahl, C., Johnson, G., Andreina, M., Sadowsky, M.J., Wackett, L.P.,
2005. Substrate specicity and colorimetric assay for recombinant TrzN
derived from Arthrobacter aurescens TC1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71,
2214e2220.
van der Meer, J.R., 2006. Environmental pollution promotes selection of microbial
degradation pathways. Front. Ecol. Environ. 4, 35e42.
Whiteley, C.G., Lee, D.J., 2006. Enzyme technology and biological remediation.
Enzyme Microb. Technol. 38, 291e316.
Anon, 2003. Reef Water Quality Protection Plan for Catchments Adjacent to the
Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. Queensland Department of Premier and
Cabinet, Brisbane.
Bell, A.M., Duke, N.C., 2005. Effects of Photosystem II inhibiting herbicides on
mangroves - preliminary toxicology trials. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 51, 297e307.
Bird, S.B., Sutherland, T.D., Gresham, C., Oakeshott, J., Scott, C., Eddleston, M., 2008.
OpdA, a bacterial organophosphorus hydrolase, prevents lethality in rats after
poisoning with highly toxic organophosphorus pesticides. Toxicology 247,
88e92.
Field, J.A., Sierra-Alvarez, R., 2008. Microbial degradation of chlorinated benzenes.
Biodegradation 19, 463e480.
Furukawa, K., 2006. Oxygenases and dehalogenases: molecular approaches to
efcient degradation of chlorinated environmental pollutants. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 70, 2335e2348.
Gibson, D.T., Parales, R.E., 2000. Aromatic hydrocarbon dioxygenases in environmental biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11, 236e243.
Hayes, T.B., Collins, A., Lee, M., Mendoza, M., Noriega, N., Stuart, A.A., Vonk, A.,
2002. Hermaphroditic, demasculinized frogs after exposure to the herbicide
atrazine at low ecologically relevant doses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 99,
5476e5480.
Huff, J., 2002. IARC monographs, industry inuence, and upgrading, downgrading,
and under-grading chemicals e a personal point of view. Int. J. Occup. Environ.
Health 8, 249e270.
Huff, J., Sass, J., 2007. Atrazine e a likely human carcinogen? Int. J. Occup. Environ.
Health 13, 356e358.
Jackson, C.J., Foo, J.L., Kim, H.K., Carr, P.D., Liu, J.W., Salem, G., Ollis, D.L., 2008. In
crystallo capture of a Michaelis complex and product-binding modes of
a bacterial phosphotriesterase. J. Mol. Biol. 375, 1189e1196.
Jones, R.J., Kerwell, A., 2003. Phytotoxicity of photosystem II (PSII) herbicides to
coral. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 261, 149e159.
Lewis, S.E., Brodie, J.E., Bainbridge, Z.T., Rohde, K.W., Davis, A.M., Masters, B.L.,
Maughan, M., Devlin, M.J., Mueller, J.F., Schaffelke, B., 2009. Pesticides: a new
threat to the Great Barrier Reef. Environ. Pollut. 157, 2470e2484.
Russell, R.J., Sutherland, T.D., Horne, I., Oakeshott, J.G., 2001. Enzymatic bioremediation of chemical pesticides. Australas. Biotechnol. 11, 24e26.
Scott, C., Pandey, G., Hartley, C.J., Jackson, C.J., Cheesman, M.J., Taylor, M.C.,
Pandey, R., Khurana, J.L., Teese, M., Coppin, C.W., Weir, K.M., Jain, R.K., Lal, R.,
Russell, R.J., Oakeshott, J.G., 2008. The enzymatic basis for pesticide bioremediation. Indian J. Microbiol. 48, 65e79.
Scott, C., Jackson, C.J., Coppin, C.W., Mourant, R.G., Hilton, M.E., Sutherland, T.D.,
Russell, R.J., Oakeshott, J.G., 2009. Catalytic improvement and evolution of
atrazine chlorohydrolase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 2184e2191.
de Souza, M.L., Sadowsky, M.J., Wackett, L.P., 1996. Atrazine chlorohydrolase from
Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP: gene sequence, enzyme purication, and protein
characterization. J. Bacteriol. 178, 4894e4900.
Strong, L.C., McTavish, H., Sadowsky, M.J., Wackett, L.P., 2000. Field-scale remediation of atrazine-contaminated soil using recombinant Escherichia coli expressing atrazine chlorohydrolase. Environ. Microbiol. 2, 91e98.
2078
Sutherland, T.D., Horne, I., Weir, K.M., Coppin, C.W., Williams, M.R.,
Selleck, M., Russell, R.J., Oakeshott, J.G., 2004. Enzymatic bioremediation:
from enzyme discovery to applications. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 31,
817e821.
Sutton, W.F., Brown, A.E., Truelove, B., 1984. Atrazine-resistant and diuron-resistant
strains of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. Weed Sci. 32, 664e669.
Thurman, E.M., Meyer, M.T., 1996. Herbicide metabolites in surface water and
groundwater: introduction and overview. In: Meyer, M.T., Thurman, E.M. (Eds.),