Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
http://www.jbc.org/content/suppl/2007/08/08/M704651200.DC1.html
THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 282, NO. 40, pp. 29424 29430, October 5, 2007
2007 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Printed in the U.S.A.
Received for publication, June 6, 2007, and in revised form, August 6, 2007 Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 8, 2007, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M704651200
Lior Cohen, Nitza Ilan, Maya Gur, Walter Stuhmer, Dalia Gordon1, and Michael Gurevitz2
From the Department of Plant Sciences, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv,
69978 Tel-Aviv, Israel and Department of Molecular Biology and Neuronal Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Experimental
Medicine, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
* This
S
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains
supplemental Figs. S1 and S2 and Table S1.
1
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 972-3-6409844; Fax: 9723-6406100; E-mail: dgordon@post.tau.ac.il.
2
To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: mamgur@post.
tau.ac.il.
The abbreviations used are: Nav, voltage-gated sodium channel; Css4, Centruroides suffusus suffusus -toxin 4; hypoPP, hypokalemic periodic
paralysis.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Mutagenesis of Css4PCR-driven mutagenesis, expression
in Escherichia coli, in vitro folding, and purification of Css4
derivatives have been described in detail elsewhere (25).
Expression of Sodium Channels in OocytesThe pNa200
vectors bearing the genes encoding rNav1.2a, rNav1.3, and
rNav1.6 were a gift from Dr. A. Goldin (University of California,
Irvine). The pAlter vectors bearing the genes encoding rNav1.4
and hNav1.5 were a gift from Dr. R. G. Kallen (University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). These genes and the auxiliary
h1 were transcribed in vitro using T7 RNA polymerase and
the mMESSAGE mMACHINETM system (Ambion, Austin,
TX) (27, 28) and injected into Xenopus laevis oocytes as previously described (21).
Site-directed Mutagenesis of rNav1.4pAlter containing the
entire rat skeletal muscle sodium channel -subunit was used
for oligonucleotide-based mutagenesis. The PCR-amplified
fragment containing the mutations E592A, H599Q/D601S/
N602S, E650A, L653A, Q657E, G658N, and R666G was
cleaved by BsiwI and BssHII and inserted into the corresponding sites of the vector. E1251N and H1257K were
cleaved by EcoNI and inserted into the corresponding sites
of the vector, which was further used for transcription after
DNA sequence verification.
Two Electrode Voltage Clamp Recording and Data Analysis
Currents were measured 12 days after injection using a two
electrode voltage clamp and a Gene Clamp 500 amplifier
(Axon Instruments, Union City, CA). Data were sampled at
10 kHz and filtered at 5 kHz. Toxins were diluted with bath
solution and applied directly to the bath to achieve the
desired final concentration. Data acquisition was controlled
by a Macintosh PPC 7100/80 computer equipped with an
ITC-16 analog/digital converter (Instrutech Corp., Port
Washington, NY), using Synapse (Synergistic Systems). The
bath solution contained 96 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, and 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.85. Oocytes were
washed with bath solution flowing from a BPS-8 perfusion
system (ALA Scientific Instruments, Westbury, NY) with a
positive pressure of 4 psi.
Capacitance transients and leak currents were removed by
subtracting a scaled control trace using a P/6 protocol (29).
For the GV analysis, mean conductance (G) was calculated
from the peak current/voltage relationship using the equation G I/(V Vrev), where I is the peak current, V is the
membrane potential, and Vrev is the reversal potential. The
normalized conductance/voltage relationship was fit with
either a one- or two-component Boltzmann distribution
according to Equation 1
G/Gmax (1 A)/(1 exp[(V112 V)/k1]) A/(1
exp[(V212 V)/k2])
where V112 and V212 are the respective membrane potentials
for two populations of channels for which the mean conductance is half maximal, k1 and k2 are their respective slopes, and A
defines the proportion of the second population (amplitude)
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
29425
RESULTS
Comparison of Css4 Interactions with Rat Skeletal Muscle
and Brain Navs and Construction of a Specific Modifier for
Nav1.4To clarify the difference in Css4 potency at Nav1.2a
versus Nav1.4 we sought for the toxin bioactive surface
toward the skeletal muscle Nav and compared it with the
reported surface toward brain Navs (25). We have previously
shown that substitution of Tyr-4, Thr-10, Phe-14, Leu-19,
Tyr-24, Arg-27, Glu-28, Gln-32, Tyr-40, Tyr-42, Phe-44,
Trp-47, Trp-58, and Lys-63 for Ala considerably affected
Css4 binding affinity for rat brain synaptosomes (supplemental Table S1 and Ref. 25). Most of these substitutions
also decreased the binding affinity for rat muscle membranes, except for those at Thr-10, Phe-14, Glu-28, Gln-32,
and Lys-63 (supplemental Table S1 and Fig. 1). These results
raised a subset of residues that are involved in the surface of
interaction of the toxin with both rat brain and skeletal muscle Navs and highlighted a few residues whose roles differ.
This difference is notable in light of the CD alteration ren-
dered by T10A, F14A, and K63A and the fact that Glu-28 and
Gln-32 have been assigned to the hot spot in the surface of
interaction of Css4 with the rat brain channel (25). Thus,
receptor site-4, which pertains to the interface between Css4
and the Nav, differs in mammalian brain versus muscle Navs,
especially in respect to Phe-14 and Glu-28 (supplemental
Table S1), which laid the groundwork for construction of a
mutant toxin specific for Nav1.4. Because the affinity of
mutant E15A for both channel types exceeded 10-fold that of
the unmodified toxin (supplemental Table 1 and Fig. 1), we
constructed Css4 mutants bearing various combinations of
substitutions F14A and E28R in the background of E15A.
The most significant among these constructs was the triple
mutant Css4F14A/E15A/E28R, whose affinity for the brain channel dropped 254-fold whereas its affinity for the skeletal
muscle channel was similar to that of Css4E15A (supplemental Table S1), thus providing a highly selective ligand for
muscle channels.
We then analyzed the effects of these mutants on a variety of
mammalian Navs co-expressed in Xenopus oocytes with the 1
subunit, using Css4E15A as the first point of reference. Css4E15A
was active at rNav1.2a and rNav1.4 but had no effect at rNav1.3,
hNav1.5, and rNav1.6 even at a concentration of 5 M (Table 1
and supplemental Fig. S1). Hence, the preference of Css4E15A
for the mammalian Nav subtypes was similar to that of Css4 (19,
23, 33), yet the potency of Css4E15A increased 10-fold (EC50
0.46 for rNav1.2a and 0.88 M for rNav1.4) compared with the
unmodified toxin (25). Css4E15A induced a 25-mV shift in the
threshold of activation for both rNav1.2a and rNav1.4 (at 0.5
and 1 M, respectively) (Fig. 2 and supplemental Fig. S1). The
conductance-voltage relation (G/V) curves for rNav1.2a and
rNav1.4 in the presence of Css4E15A exhibit two components
with a minor negative shift in the voltage for half activation
(V0.5) of the entire channel population and a stronger shift in
the V0.5 of a fraction of the channel population (Fig. 2 and Table
1, values in parentheses). The effects of Css4E15A on channel
activation resembled those of Css4 in the requirement for a
depolarizing prepulse of similar duration and the rates of assoVOLUME 282 NUMBER 40 OCTOBER 5, 2007
with respect to the total. For fits in which only one population of
channels was apparent, A was set to zero. The voltage dependence of steady-state fast inactivation was described using a single Boltzmann distribution as shown in Equation 2
I/Imax 0 1/(1 exp[(V V12)/k])
where I is the peak current measured during the test depolarization step, Imax is the current without a preceding conditioning step, V is the membrane potential of the conditioning
step, V12 is the membrane potential at which half-maximal inactivation is achieved, k is the slope factor, 0 is the remaining
normalized peak current at highly depolarizing conditioning
potentials, and 1 is the normalized amplitude (30). For mutant
double cycle analysis, the dose response for Css4 effects on
rNav1.4 was determined based on the current induced by the
toxin following a test pulse to a voltage of 35 mV from the V0.5
of activation determined for each channel mutant (Table 1).
The free energy change in toxin binding to the wild-type/mutant channel pair (G) was calculated as the difference of the
average RTln (EC50) for the wild type and mutant, where R is
the gas constant and T stands for temperature in 0K. G was
taken as the difference of the Gs for Css4 and the toxin
mutant: G (GWT, native Gmutant, native) (GWT, mutant
Gmutant, mutant), where the first and second subscript positions refer to the channel and the toxin, respectively. RT
0.59 kcal/mol.
Binding ExperimentsSkeletal muscle membranes and brain
synaptosomes were prepared from adult albino Wistar rats
(300 g, laboratory-bred) as previously described (31, 32). The
rats were sacrificed according to the rules of the Animal Care
Unit at Tel Aviv University (permit number L-03-54) following
National Institutes of Health guidelines. Radio-iodination of
Css4, purification of monoiodotoxin, and binding assays were
performed as previously described (25). Nonspecific toxin
binding was determined in the presence of 1 M unlabeled toxin
and consisted typically of 1530% of total binding. Each experiment was performed in duplicate and repeated at least three
times as indicated (n). Data are presented as the mean S.D.
for independent experiments.
Control
V0.5 mV
E15A
V0.5 mV
rNav1.2a
E15A/F14A
E15A/R27Q
E15A/E28R
V0.5 mV
V0.5 mV
10
25.3 0.3
10
25.1 0.2
10
26.1 0.3
V0.5 mV
F14A/E15A/E28R
M
10
V0.5 mV
25.2 1.2
rNav1.3
19.1 0.5
18.1 0.6
ND
ND
10
19.4 0.7
10
18.8 1.4
hNav1.5
35.1 0.3
35 0.5
ND
ND
10
35 0.4
10
35.1 0.4
rNav1.6
27.7 0.5
25.8 1.6
ND
10
26.3 0.4
10
26.7 0.9
rNav1.4
24.9 0.3
31 0.2
36.1 2.1 (21%)
31.4 0.4
40.1 2.5 (22%)
25
29.2 0.4
34.5 1.5 (12%)
31 0.2
36.3 1.6 (21%)
E592A
15.1 0.6
16.3 0.2
31 2.7 (25%)
20
16.2 0.4
30 2.1 (25%)
10
14.9 0.4
16.7 0.3
35.7 2.6 (28%)
10
15.1 0.3
H599Q/D601S/
N602S
25 0.2
25.3 0.2
25.3 0.2
10
24.4 0.7
24.3 1.2
E650A
20 0.4
22.5 0.5
43.2 1.7 (28%)
10
-20 0.3
30
21.3 0.3
37.7 2.1 (16%)
10
20.2 0.6
L653A
22.3 0.2
10
23.6 0.1
10
23.3 0.7
10
23.6 0.1
10
23.8 0.4
Q657E
25 0.2
26.1 0.3
41 3.1 (19%)
10
25.2 0.8
G658N
26.8 0.2
10
26.8 0.3
10
26.6 0.5
10
26.7 0.3
10
26.8 0.3
E1251N
27.2 0.5
29.5 0.5
52 2.3 (27%)
30 0.7
56 5.2 (26%)
29.7 0.5
52.3 3.1 (30%)
25
30.2 0.6
54 3.2 (25%)
10
26.8 0.8
H1257K
29.7 0.4
31.7 0.9
39.3 2.7 (17%)
31.5 0.2
38.7 2.1 (16%)
10
32.7 0.3
38.5 2.8 (14%)
10
31.7 0.5
39.1 1.8 (16%)
ND
26.8 0.3
10
1
10
31.1 0.2
26.4 0.9
46 1.6 (20%)
26.3 1.3
43 2.1 (18%)
29427
26.4 0.1
45 2 (18%)
25 0.3
31.6 0.3
39.5 2.5 (24%)
29429
DISCUSSION
The design of Css4F14A/E15A/E28R,
a specific activator of rNav1.4, was
based on systematic analysis of the
binding of a large collection of Css4
mutants to Navs in rat brain and rat
skeletal muscle membrane preparations and the finding that substitution of Phe-14 and Glu-28 for Ala
markedly decreased activity at the
brain channel without affecting
activity at the muscle channel.
Despite these differences, the substitution of a number of other Css4
residues had a similar impact on the
two channel subtypes, suggesting
FIGURE 5. Schematic presentation of the inter-domain arrangement of the voltage-sensing and pore
modules in rNav1.4. A, schematic Css4 structural model (in ribbon) (23) based on the known structure of the that the toxin recognizes a similar
-toxin Cn2 (90% similarity in sequence) (35) (PDB accession 1cn2) highlighting the three residues shown region on both channels. The simhere to have coupling energies with channel residues derived from three distinct extracellular loops of ilar/non-similar face of toxin interDomains 2 (yellow) and 3 (blue). B, external view of the proposed inter-domain arrangement of the transmembrane segments (S1-S6) in the mammalian Nav based on panel A and following the proposed similarity in action with these channels raised
intra-domain arrangement between NaChBac and Kv1.2 (3, 6). The dashed line illustrates a Css4 projection in its two experimental avenues that
putative bound form to demonstrate the size relations of the toxin and the channel.
could exploit Css4F14A/E15A/E28R.
The first was to assess the therapeuand the two types of Navs. Based on the general conservation of tic potential of such a specific Na activator, and the second was
v
mammalian Navs and the elucidation of a subset of common to examine its interaction with the skeletal muscle channel.
residues involved in the interaction of Css4 with the two chanThe Putative Therapeutic Potential of Css4F14A/E15A/E28R in
nel types, we compared the effects of Css4E15A, Css4F14A/E15A, Neuromuscular DisordersOver thirty mutations in SCN4A,
Css4E15A/E28R, and Css4F14A/E15A/E28R on the activation prop- the gene encoding the skeletal muscle Na , have been linked to
v
erties of the eight rNav1.4 mutants. In addition, we included in neuromuscular disorders such as hypo- and hyperkalemic
E15A/R27Q
this comparative analysis Css4
because of the proximperiodic paralyses, paramyotonia congenital, Nav myotonias,
ity of Arg-27 to Glu-28 and the similar effect of its substitution
and congenital myasthenic syndrome (8). Three of these mutaon both rNav1.2a and rNav1.4 (supplemental Table S1 and
tions were localized to D2/S4 of hNav1.4 (R669H, R672G/H/S,
Table 1) (25). Where a significant change in activity was
and R675G/Q/W) (reviewed in Ref. 8), and one was localized to
obtained (Table 1), the EC50 values were determined, enabling
D3/S4 of hNav1.4 (R1132Q) (14). Skeletal muscle fibers from a
mutant double cycle analysis (Table 2 and supplemental Fig.
patient
heterozygous for R672G displayed depolarization and
S2). The EC50 of Css4F14A/E15A at rNav1.4E592A was 20-fold
weakness in low potassium extracellular solution (15). Both the
higher than its EC50 at the unmodified channel (19.2 2.1
increased inactivation and the impaired voltage dependence of
versus 0.93 0.15 M; Table 2), indicating a coupling energy of
1.65 kcal/mol between F14A of the toxin and E592A of the activation caused by the R672G mutation may contribute to the
channel. Css4E15A/R27Q hardly affected rNav1.4 (EC50 26.2 reduction of Nav performance and reduced membrane excit2.9 M), indicating the importance of Arg-27 for Css4 interac- ability (14). Sternberg et al. (34) reported a very severe hypoPP
tion with its rNav1.4 receptor site (Table 2). Of the eight chan- phenotype in a family carrying the R672G mutation where the
to treatnel mutations, E1251N significantly increased the ability of frequency and severity of attacks increased in response
F14A/E15A/E28R
E15A/R27Q
ment
with
acetazolamide.
The
ability
of
Css4
to
Css4
to produce a negative shift in the conductanceR666G
restore
the
gating
properties
of
rNa
1.4
(Fig.
3),
which
v
voltage relations of the channel (Tables 1 and 2). Indeed, the
R672G
, demonstrates a
potency of Css4E15A/R27Q at rNav1.4E1251N was very similar to mimicked the hypoPP mutation hNav1.4
E15A
putative
therapeutic
potential
when
seeking
a
remedy
to the defecthat of Css4
(Table 2). This indicates that R27Q has a sigF14A/E15A/E28R
tive
SCN4A
gene
product.
The
specificity
of
Css4
for
nificant positive coupling energy with E1251N (G 1.89
E15A/E28R
the
skeletal
muscle
Na
suggests
that
it
merits
investigation
as
a
kcal/mol). Most intriguing were the effects of Css4
v
on
E15A/E28R
possible
treatment
for
hypoPP
and
perhaps
other
neuromuscuthe channel mutants. Whereas the EC50 of Css4
for the
unmodified channel was very similar to that of Css4E15A (0.98 lar disorders with symptoms of reduced muscle excitability.
Derivation of Channel Architecture from Css4-rNav1.4
0.03 M), it increased prominently for rNav1.4E650A and
E1251N
Mutant
Double Cycle AnalysisThe interaction of Css4 and
rNav1.4
(29.8 3.1 and 23.9 2.7 M, respectively)
rNa
1.4
was
examined by mutant double cycle analysis, focus(Tables 1 and 2 and Fig. 4B). Hence, a single Css4 residue (Gluv
28) exhibits negative coupling energy with two channel residues ing on residues employed in the design of the selective activator
(G 1.8 and 1.41 kcal/mol for E650A and E1251N, and on rNav1.4 channel residues whose equivalents were either
respectively) positioned on two distinct extracellular loops in proposed to be involved in the interaction of Css4 with rNav1.2a
Domains 2 and 3 (D2/S3-S4 and D3/SS2-S6).
(20) or whose substitution was shown to affect the interaction
REFERENCES
1. Catterall, W. A. (2000) Neuron 26, 1325
2. Gordon, D. (1997) in Toxins and Signal Transduction (Lazarowici, P., and
Gutman, Y., eds.) pp. 119 149, Harwood, Amsterdam
3. Long, S. B., Campbell, E. B., and MacKinnon, R. (2005) Science 309,
897903
4. Long, S. B., Campbell, E. B., and MacKinnon, R. (2005) Science 309,
903908
5. Bezanilla, F. (2000) Physiol. Rev. 80, 555592
6. Richardson, J., Blunck, R., Ge, P., Selvin, P. R., Bezanilla, F., Papazian,
D. M., and Correa, A. M. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103,
1586515870
7. Goldin, A. L. (1999) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 868, 38 50
8. Vicart, S., Sternberg, D., Fontaine, B., and Meola, G. (2005) Neurol. Sci. 26,
194 202
9. Lehmann-Horn, F., and Jurkat-Rott, K. (1999) Physiol. Rev. 79, 13171372
10. Cannon, S. C. (2001) Clin. Neurosci. Res. 1, 104 117
11. Cannon, S. C. (2002) Neuromuscul. Disord. 12, 533543
12. Jurkat-Rott, K., Lerche, H., and Lehmann-Horn, F. (2002) J. Neurol. 249,
14931502
13. Kuzmenkin, A., Muncan, V., Jurkat-Rott, K., Hang, C., Lerche, H., Lehmann-Horn, F., and Mitrovic, N. (2002) Brain 125, 835 843
14. Carle, T., Lhuillier, L., Luce, S., Sternberg, D., Devuyst, O., Fontaine, B.,
and Tabti, N. (2006) Biochim. Biophys. Res. Commun. 348, 653 661
15. Jurkat-Rott, K., Mitrovic, N., Hang, C., Kouzmenkine, A., Iaizzo, P., Herzog, J., Lerche, H., Nicole, S., Vale-Santos, J., Chauveau, D., Fontaine, B.,
and Lehmann-Horn, F. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97,
9549 9554
16. Sokolov, S., Scheuer, T., and Catterall, W. A. (2007) Nature 446, 76 78
17. Martin-Eauclaire, M. F., and Couraud, F. (1995) in Handbook of Neurotoxicology (Chang, L. W., and Dyer, R. S., eds.) pp. 683716, Marcel Dekker, New York
18. Marcotte, P., Chen, L. Q., Kallen, R. G., and Chahine, M. (1997) Circ. Res.
80, 363369
19. Ceste`le, S., Qu, Y., Rogers, J. C., Rochat, H., and Catterall, W. A. (1998)
Neuron 21, 919 931
20. Ceste`le, S., Yarov-Yarovoy, V., Qu, F. H., Sampieri, F., Scheuer, T., and
Catterall, W. A. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 2133221344
21. Shichor, I., Zlotkin, E., Ilan, N., Chikashvili, D., Stuhmer, W., Gordon, D.,
and Lotan, I. (2002) J. Neurosci. 22, 4364 4371
22. Leipold, E., Hansel, A., Borges, A., and Heinemann, S. H. (2006) Mol.
Pharmacol. 70, 340 347
23. Schiavon, E., Sacco, T., Cassulini, R. R., Gurrola, G., Tempia, F., Possani,
L. D., and Wanke, E. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 20326 20337
24. Cohen, L., Karbat, I., Gilles, N., Froy, O., Angelovici, R., Gordon, D., and
Gurevitz, M. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 8206 8211
25. Cohen, L., Karbat, I., Gilles, N., Ilan, N., Gordon, D., and Gurevitz, M.
(2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 50455053
26. Karbat, I., Turkov, M., Cohen, L., Kahn, R., Gordon, D., Gurevitz, M., and
Frolow, F. (2006) J. Mol. Biol. 366, 586 601
27. Gershon, E., Weigl, L., Lotan, I., Schreibmayer, W., and Dascal, N. (1992)
J. Neurosci. 12, 37433752
28. Wallner, M., Weigl, L., Meera, P., and Lotan, I. (1993) FEBS Lett. 336,
535539
29. Armstrong, C. M., and Bezanilla, F. (1974) J. Gen. Physiol. 63, 533552
30. Chen, H., and Heinemann, S. H. (2001) J. Gen. Physiol. 117, 505518
31. Gordon, D., Merrick, D., Wallner, D. A., and Catterall, W. A. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 70327038
32. Gilles, N., Leipold, E., Chen, H., Heinemann, S. H., and Gordon, D. (2001)
Biochemistry 40, 14576 14584
33. Bosmans, F., Martin-Eauclaire, M. F., and Tytgat, J. (2006) Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol. 218, 4551
34. Sternberg, D., Maisonobe, T., Jurkat-Rott, K., Nicole, S., Launay, E., Chauveau, D., Tabti, N., Lehmann-Horn, F., Hainque, B., and Fontaine, B.
(2001) Brain 124, 10911099
35. Pintar, A., Possani, L. D., and Delepierre, M. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 287,
359 367