Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
John A. Meech
NBK Institute of Mining Engineering, University of British Columbia, Canada
Outline
Background
Tailings Retreatment
Tailings Retreatment Model
Design and Economic Module
Disposal and Reclamation Module
Risk Assessment Module
Decision-Making Module
Validation and Verification
Conclusions and Recommendations
Tailings:
Rock waste material after grinding and extraction that is
disposed of as a slurry.
Waste
Closure regulations
Brings no money
Water quality?
ARD?
Takes up space
Dam Failure?
Pollution?
Dust Issues?
Social Concerns:
Dam Failure
Merriespruit Mine, Virginia, South Africa
Source: http://www.tailings.info/merriespruit.htm
http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100026732/1100100026841
ARD
Britannia Mine, BC
Processing
Disposal
Reclamation
Hydraulic Mining
Mechanical Excavation
Grinding
Heap leaching
Tank leaching
Flotation
Flotation concentrate/tailings leaching
Simplified Flowchart
of
Retreatment Method
Tailings RetreatmentWhy?
Investment opportunity
Revenue from metal extraction
Offset of rehabilitation costs
Failure prevention
Elimination of pollution remediation costs
Long-term liability reduction
Economic benefits
Improvement in long-term liability
Framework of the
Tailings Retreatment
Model
Mod
Good
Low
Low
Low
Low
Mod
Low
Mod
Mod
High
Low
Mod
High
Environmental
Sustainability
Project NPV @ 5%
Sum of A & B
Not Used
DCFROR
Not Used
Flowsheet Alternatives
1.Flotation (bulk)
2.Regrinding (coarse) + flotation
(bulk)
3.Flotation (bulk) + heap leaching
of flotation tailings (new TSF)
4.Flotation (bulk) + tank leaching
of concentrate
5.Flotation (bulk) + heap leaching
of concentrate pile
6.Heap leaching (bulk)
7.Heap leaching (coarse)
8.Agglomeration/heap leaching
(bulk)
9.Tank leaching (bulk)
10.Tank leaching + flotation
(leach residue)
11.Regrinding (coarse) + tank
leaching (bulk)
Complete Copper Processing
Flowsheet over 1,000 combos
Alternatives Definition
(Scoping)
Site Characteristics
Tailings Characteristics
Option 2
Option1
....
Option n
Local Climate
Topography
Land
Disturbance
Cost
Environment
& Stability
Weight Factors
Identify Potential
Failure Modes
and Mechanisms
FAM Map
for
Risk Characteristics
What can
happen?
Hazard
Assessment
Exposure
Assessment
How likely is it
to happen?
Risk
Characterization
What is the
risk of each
failure mode?
Decision-Making Module
Decision-Making Criteria:
Economic
Issues
Economic
Performance
NPV
@5%
Technical
Issues
Environmental
Performance
DoB
Current Risk
DoB
SocialEnvironment
al Issues
MINE A
Large
0.12
No
Poor
>7
MINE B
Large
0.18
No
Medium
3-4.5
MINE C
Medium
0.12
Yes
Poor
5-6
MINE D
Small
0.18
Yes
OK
5-6
High
Medium
Low
Low
WTP*
None
None
None
High
High
Medium
Low
Economic
Benefit
(NPV@5%)
Mine A
$135,534,000
Mine B
Mine C
Mine D
$177,315,000
$-13,135,000
$10,808,000
Cases
Economic
Benefit
Mine A
Mine B
Mine C
Mine D
Medium
Very-Good
Very-Low
Low
Model Results
Environmental
Risk Factor
Performance
(DoB)
(DoB)
80
56
67
88
66
85
18
84
Expected Results
Current
Environmental
Environmental and
Performance
Social Risk
High
Medium
Medium to High
High
Medium to High
High
Low
High
Retreatment
Recommendation
(DoB)
95
95
24
43
Retreatment
Recommendation
High
High
Medium
Medium
Cap / Op Costs
MINE A
-25%
+40%
MINE B
-28%
>+50%*
MINE C
+10%
-15%
MINE D
-8%
+20%
Recommendations
Conclusions
Questions?
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!