Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1 INTRODUTION
In our country generally mobile fast-food business now becomes most reliable and selfemployed business. For this business to be recognized vendor cart is a well-known mean
of transportation space directly affect the business of a person. The working area belongs
to the unorganized sector to run a business depending upon cart skill is not being
required. Thats why there is a lack of not scientific consideration and special attention is
unnecessary. A large number of youth, men and women are working in this sector for
prolonged periods with inappropriate working posture, workstation design, and furlong
working hours, task variable without consideration appropriate space for their movement.
This leads to the development of different kinds of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)
among them.
As a problem shooter ergonomics place an essential rule in order to design a
workplace in analyzing the task. The ergonomically designed workstation also gives
healthy working environment, safety, increase efficiency, and reduce work related
musculoskeletal injuries and problem such as occupational diseases, cumulative trauma,
repetitive stress injuries, and occupational overexertion syndrome which mostly affect to
arm and back.
The complete work pattern for the vendor cart consist up taking orders, making
and serving food, and collect money has to do work in static posture for long duration in
a poor workstation which promote unnecessary in a physical effort. Standing
position
creates not only pressure on the spine and disc, but also knee and elbow pain. This type of
posture can increase the pressure on the muscles, ligaments and other soft tissues of the
musculoskeletal system. Hence the overall discomfort and pain in the back, neck, and
shoulder are common symptoms observed in the vendors.
Considering the above aspects it is been decided to take a step regarding the
working pattern in this socially unattended area by introducing basic aspects of
ergonomics which reduces work related MSDs and suggest of proper methods to work
and for workstation comfortable without any physical fatigue.
In the present study around 20 vendors from Nagpur have participated. To
evaluate the actual presence of problem, a detailed questionnaire is made by considering
the information related to MSDs problems. Working condition, compatibility, working
hours, the problem faced during working. The existing workstation and worker, poor
body postures are assessed and analyze with the help of ERGOFELLOW SOFTWARE
tools.
After all analysis a workstation and working method are suggested at the same
place where worker used to do the work. And to check the feasibility of working method
and workstation various value from software, body parts movements within ROM,
postures, are compared with the previous method and workstation to get the same result.
1.2 AIM AND OBJECTIVE
The primary objective of this research work was to study existing workstation, MSDs
problem, and psychological aspects among vendor. And remedy them with a proper
scientific study and workstation design so that vendors can do better workout any
consequences.
Following objective is chosen for achievement of AIM:1.
2.
3.
4.
1.3 ASSUMTION
LIMITATION:
As the vendors have less education, lack of knowledge about proper workstation.
It was quite difficult to convince the vendor to participate in the project work. It
eliminates the discussion with vendors about the problems faced by them and benefits
after workstation design.
PROBLEM ON HAND
2.1 INTRODUCTION
On an average, each vendor does work for 5 to 6 hours in a day. To get the actual idea
about the workstation 20 vendors has been visited space for work over the cart were
observed by measuring the working area, position of the vendor in the working area,
position of containers over the cart, availability of the raw materials for the preparation
for food, technique adopted for serving food. Following figure shows, vendors postures
and workstation arrangement during complete business through different working spaces.
much.
8. No one is conscious about the work layout, conditions, and proper facilities to do
work with less effort.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.4 CONCLUSION
As per the problem which is being found through an observation from both workstation
& vendors activities. We are being trying to resolve this problem through ergonomics
aspect.
2.1 Introduction:
The considerable amount of research had been done by the ergonomic approach to solve
the problem of discomfort in various applications in industrial or non-industrial areas by
eliminating conventional method and introduced new standard method for doing the
work.
Shovel, spade and hoe are common implements used in different types of manual
material handling (MMH) task. Sen. et. al. observed that with the new ergonomically
designed prototype both the purposes of shovel and the hoe could be attained. [1] The
new design is well accepted by the workers.
Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs) among office worker is considered
by Robertson et.al [2]. In their work the trained group mitigate the symptoms and change
behavior and enhance performance through training combined with a sit-stand work
station has implication s for preventing discomforts in office workers.
The introduction of sitstand worktables was examined by Wilks et.al [3]. It is examining
the four companys use of the worktables sit-stand function and influence to some
variable on this.
A distribution of manual materials handling task parameters is observed by Ciriello et.al
[4]. In their study, they determine the percentage distribution of each of the task
parameters, i.e., weight, height, distance and frequency. They had concluded that
continued effort should be extended toward redesign of MMH tasks and components of
tasks that violate good ergonomic principles.
Ferguson
et.al
[5]
studies
the
musculoskeletal
disorder
risk
associated
with current assembly processes were compared to using a cantilever chair intervention.
Spine loads and normalized shoulder muscle activity were evaluated during assembly in
eight regions of the vehicle. And it is been found that Spine loads were not significantly
different between the current and cantilever chair conditions. Thus, the effectiveness of
the cantilever chair was dependent on the region of the vehicle. Singh et.al has studies the
Musculoskeletal Disorder among Workers in small scale Forging Industry. [6]. the most
common ergonomics problems were found in industry like wrong working positions of
the workers and manual material handling. MSDs are found due to inappropriate and
poor working postures, lack of task variation, poor ergonomic design of work places, and
poor design of plant layout, long working hours, low salaries and awkward schedules are
all areas where relatively simple intervention can significantly reduce the rate of exposure
to MSDs.
8
the subject in industrial design [12]. In year 1995 Roozenburg et.al. had defined product
design as the process of devising and laying down the plans that are needed for the
manufacturing of a product. [13]
Thus engineering design and industrial design are viewed as the major elements
of product design that take effort in the practical design activity.
10
disciplines cover, we argue that the products that both disciplines deal with during their
collaboration are those relevant to the study of product design.
2.2.2 Design Approach Design is said to be a human problem solving process. So every design process
has common elements. That is, it starts with a perception of a problem and ends with
some kind of related solution. The problem is transformed into a solution through the
design process. However depending on the discipline, the design processes used is
distinctive in specific way. One of the very simplest and general design process models is
explained in three iterative steps; analysis synthesis evaluation [15].
11
In year 2007 Hong et. al. illustrates this design process in eight steps. They are 1.
Design initiate, 2. Design research, 3. Design analysis, 4. Design concept, 5. Design
development, 6. Design finalization, 7. Design evaluation and 8. Design communication.
[16] In the year 2008 another, industrial design process which is been proposed by Ulrich
et. Alphas six phases; 1. Investigation of customer needs, 2.Conceptualization,
3.preliminary refinement, 4. Further refinement and final concept selection, 5. Control
drawings or models, and 6. Coordination with engineering, manufacturing, and external
vendors [17].
The engineering design process generally has similarity with the industrial design
process but detailed tasks are different. In their design process model, by Pal ET. al. in
1997 describe the engineering design process with four phases shown in Fig. were the
clarification of the task, conceptual design, embodiment design and detail design.
12
Most of the design processes from the engineering design discipline have a stance
that layout design is prior to form design although layout and form design are described
to be developed though an iterative and possibly reflective process.
2.3 Ergonomic approach to the product design:2.3.1 Posture Analysis:Body posture can be analyzed using Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) method also
by REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment).RULA is a method developed for use in
ergonomics investigation of workplaces where work related upper limb disorders are
reported. RULA is a screening tool that assesses biomechanical and postural loading on
the whole body with particular attention to the neck, trunk and upper limbs. A RULA
assessment requires little time to complete and the scoring generates an action list, which
indicated the level of intervention required to reduce the risks of a broader ergonomic
study.
Drs. McAtamney and Corlett(1993) of the University of Nottinghams Institute of
Occupational Ergonomics developed the RULA [20]. Steps for posture assessment by
RULA,
1. Observing and selecting the posture(s) to assess: - A RULA assessment
represents a moment in the work cycle and it is important to observe the pressures
being adopted whilst undertaking the tasks prior to selecting the posture (s) for
assessment. Depending upon the type of study, selection may be
made of the
longest held posture or what appears to be the worst posture(s) adopted. In some
instances, for example when the work cycle is long or postures are varied it may
be more appropriate to take an assessment at regular intervals. It will be evident
that if assessments are taken at set intervals over the working period the
proportion of time spent in the various postures can be evaluated.
14
2. Scoring and Recording the posture: - Decide whether the left, right or both
upper arms are to be assessed. Score the posture of each body part using the
software. Review the scoring and make any adjustment if required. Select
calculation button.
3. Action Level: - The grand score can be compared to the Action Level list
however it must be remembered that since the human body is a complex and
adaptive system, they provide a guide for further action.
RULA sheet format given Appendix 1.
15
Ergonomics means The Natural Laws for doing work, also known as Human
Engineering implies to fit the jobs and worker together. Ergonomics is the study of
designing equipment and devices that fit the human body, its movements, and its related
abilities.
A more detailed definition describes ergonomics asAccording to International Labor Organization (ILO) -It is the application of human
biological sciences in conjunction with engineering sciences to the worker and his
working environment, so to obtain maximum satisfaction for the worker which at the
same time enhances productivity.
The International Ergonomics Association (IEA) -Ergonomics (for human factors) is the
scientific discipline concerned with the understanding of interactions among humans and
other elements of a system, and the profession that applies theory, principles, data and
methods to design in order to optimize human well-being and overall system
performance. [18]
According to the International Ergonomics Association there are three disciplines of
ergonomics
activity.
Cognitive ergonomics: is concerned with mental processes, such as perception,
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
RISK
DEFINITION
POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
FACTORS
Poor work Aspects of how a job is organized.
organization
Reasonable
task
workload,
sufficient
variety,
individual
deadlines.
Performing the same motion over and over.
Repetition
Excessive
different tasks.
Forceful body movement. Excessive physical Reduce the exertion
Force
needed
to
Awkward
Prolonged
bending,
posture
squatting, kneeling.
reaching,
assists.
twisting, Design task and equipment to keep
the body in neutral positions.
17
Awkward posture is the opposite of natural Neutral positions put no undue stress
Stationary
position.
on muscles, joints and nerves.
Staying in one position too long, causing Design tasks to avoid stationary
Positions
Excessive
change positions.
Contact of the body with a hard surface or Avoid resting body on hard surfaces,
Direct
edge, such as the corner of a table or too little such as desks and counters. Upgrade
Positions
illumination
ergonomic
pens,
mats
for
Inadequate
standing.
Sources and levels of light that provide too Adjust natural and artificial lighting.
lighting
18
When the physical capabilities of worker do not match with the physical
requirement of the job that times WMSDs occurs.[13]
2.4.2.1 MSD RISK FACTORS
Force
Repetition
Awkward posture
Static posture
Quick motion
Compression or contact stress
Vibration
Cold temperature
2.4.2.2 MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS IN BODY PARTS:Following table 2.2 shows the possible cause of diseases and their symptoms to various
body parts during work. [13]
Body parts affected
Fingers
Symptoms
Difficulty
Possible cause
Disease name
moving Repetitive and forceful Trigger finger
jerking movements
Pain, stiffness
time to recover
Working with
Pain, swelling
Hand
and
motions
Arms
Pain, swelling
wrist syndrome
outstretched Tenosynovitis
sideways, forward or
Back
Legs
Low
upward
pain, Trunk curved forward Back disability
back
shooting
pain
numbness
in
upper legs
Feet
,leg
or while standing/sitting
the
pain, Standing in one place Standing
varicose veins
too
19
long,
disability,
Neck
continuously
Head inclined
Neck pain
much
forward
backward
Table 3.2: Musculoskeletal disorders in body parts
20
FIGURE
POSTURE
NEUTRAL
EFFORT
MAXIMUM
NO.
RANGE
RANGE
RANGE
a.
b.
Viewing angles(vertical)
Viewing
( in degree x0)
-45 to 15
-15 to 15
c.
angle(horizontal)
Neck /head vertical -45 to 45
d.
angle
Neck
e.
f.
g.
angle
Neck /head lateral angle -20 to 20
Trunk flexion-extension -30 to 30
Trunk
twist/rotation -20to 20
-35 to 35
-70 to 30
-42 to 42
h.
I.
j.
k.
l.
m.
angle
Trunk lateral bending
Wrist extension-flexion
Wrist deviation angle
Elbow included angle
Forearm rotation angle
Shoulder
extension-
-40 to 40
-85 to 85
-45 to 40
35 to 180
-180 to 90
-61 to 188
n.
o.
flexion
Shoulder add, -abduction -45 to 20
Human rotation angle
-20 to 45
/head
rotation -20 to 20
-20 to 20
-15 to 15
-15 to 5
70 to 135
-90 to -30
-27 to -45
21
-75 to 75
-45 to 45
-45 to 45
-40 to 25
50 to -160
-120 to 30
-45 to 90
-90 to 45
-80 to 80
-134 to 48
-34 to 97
Table 3.3: The range limits of different postures of the trunk and upper body
POSTURE
POSITIVE SIGN(+)
NEGATIVE (-)
E NO.
a.
b.
Viewing angles(vertical)
Viewing
Upward rotation
Left rotation
Downward rotation
Right rotation
c.
d.
angle(horizontal)
Neck /head vertical angle Extension
Neck /head rotation Left rotation
Flexion
Right rotation
e.
f.
g.
angle
Neck /head lateral angle
Right bending
Trunk flexion-extension
Extension
Trunk
twist/rotation Left rotation
Left bending
Flexion
Right rotation
h.
I.
j.
k.
l.
m.
angle
Trunk lateral bending
Wrist extension-flexion
Wrist deviation angle
Elbow included angle
Forearm rotation angle
Shoulder
extension-
Left bending
Extension
Ulnar deviation
Pronation
Extension
Right bending
Flexion
Radial deviation
Always positive
Supination
Flexion
flexion
n.
Shoulder add, -abduction Adduction
o.
Human rotation angle
Medial rotation
Table 3.4 directional signs of body segment rotation
22
Abduction
Lateral rotation
23
Figure 36. The range limits of different postures of the trunk and upper body
- 21 to 46 years
- 5 to 6 hours
24
Sl
Name
Age
Weight
Height
no
1
Sandip Jogdane
26
60
5.5
2
Netish Desai
35
65
5.7
3
Ekbal Khan
40
68
5.3
4
Samir Mujmule
28
70
5.7
5
Rum Wnkhade
46
68
5.6
6
Nilesh More
30
60
5.2
7
Imran
43
67
5.5
8
Amon Sakat
32
69
5.1
9
Sagar Jogdande
28
70
6
10
Pandit
26
68
5.7
11
Suraj Solanki
32
66
5.4
12
Pappu
27
63
5.6
13
Chotu
23
58
5.4
14
Anil kumar
42
69
5.7
15
Ashok Desai
32
61
5.5
16
Sumit Amle
40
70
5.1
17
Vikash Pande
29
60
5.3
18
Nikil Bisandre
30
65
5.7
19
Soyal Khan
32
63
5.2
20
Mridul akat
28
70
5.6
Table 4.1: Information for vendors participated in the survey
Years
of
experience
3
12
20
4
20
6
15
7
3
2
6
2
2
17
8
15
5
8
4
Working hours
5
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
5
5
5
5
6
5
5
5
5
6
5
5
Those all surveyed sheet is analyzed and it is seen that many vendors was facing the
MSDs problem in various body parts. The percentage of vendors suffering from MSDs
in different parts of the body are as back 70%, Neck 75%, Shoulder 55%, Wrist 40%,
Leg 45%, Knee 50%, Arm 40%, Elbow 35%. The result is shown graphically in Figure
4.1.
25
80
70
60
50
YES(%)
40
NO(%)
30
20
10
0
Leg
Knee
Back
Arm
Shoulder
Elbow
Wrist
Neck
Figure 4.1.: Graph of % of vendors suffering from MSDs problem in different body
parts.
26
Vendor- 1 selected for analysis was Sandi Jogdan , Age-26, Weight-60 and Height-5.5
feet
Vendor 2 selected for analysis was Pappu, Age-27, Weight-63 and Height-5.6 feet
27
From above observation, it is seen that the posture is not suitable for working as the neck
and trunk forward bending angle is not in a neutral angle (see table 2.2). Lower arm and
upper arm too much angle to the body, also long duration static position is seen during
working which is very much harmful for the body. Flexion, forward bending, in the hipjoint and back can cause lordships in the lumbar region.
4.4 RULA (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment) ANALYSIS:
28
Vendor -1
Angle
Neck Angle
Degree
25o
Trunk Angle
450
Upper arm
300
Lower arm
45o
Wrist
160
Leg
Balance
Lower arm- across the midline of the body, Wrist-wrist is bent away from the midline,
Wrist twist- twisted away from handshake position, neck- twist, trunk-twist, leg and feet
are well supported and in an evenly balanced posture
RESULT
From this it is seen that the score of RULA assessment is 7 i.e. high risk of MSDs
problem. Hence there is need to investigate the working posture and action must take as
early as possible to avoid further discrepancies.
29
4.5 CONCLUTION
From the above analysis, it was confirmed that the working place is not suitable for
working and vendors. Vendors are going through the MSDs problem and there is need to
study, analyze that working area, to get a proper method or technique or remedy all those
problems.
30
REFERENCES
11.Haik, Y., Engineering Design Process, Thomson Learning Pacific Grove CA.
USA, 2003
12.Lorenz, C., The Design Dimension, Basil Blackwell Ltd. New York, 1986.
13.Roozenburg, N. F. M. & Eekels, J., Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods,
John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Chichester, UK, 1995.
14.
Phal,
G.
&
Beitz,
W.,
Engineering
Design-a
systematic
31