Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
In this file, you can ref useful information about performance appraisal employee comments such
as performance appraisal employee commentsmethods, performance appraisal employee
comments tips, performance appraisal employee commentsforms, performance appraisal
employee comments phrases If you need more assistant for performance appraisal employee
comments, please leave your comment at the end of file.
Other useful material for you:
performanceappraisal123.com/1125-free-performance-review-phrases
performanceappraisal123.com/free-28-performance-appraisal-forms
performanceappraisal123.com/free-ebook-11-methods-for-performance-appraisal
volunteering for tasks and responsibilities no one else wants. Let her know she is a morale
booster and good team player.
Be Specific
In most performance evaluations, there are areas where an employee needs improvement. Be
specific in pointing out areas of deficiency and issue specific directives for how improvements
should be made. For instance, if an employer regularly misses deadlines, be sure to provide
examples. Write a brief overview of instances in which deadlines have been missed and the
corresponding problems this created for other staffers. Follow with instructions for improving
performance, such as, participate in a time management training program and submit future
materials 48 hours in advance of final deadline. This tells the employee what the problem is as
well as the expectations for resolving it.
Establish New Goals
Most employee performance evaluations end with setting new goals and objectives for the next
assessment period. The more detail you provide in writing about these new parameters, the better
the potential for success. Be specific in describing how you expect efforts to improve, new
responsibilities to be implemented and how future performance will be measured.
==================
1. Essay Method
In this method the rater writes down the employee
description in detail within a number of broad categories
like, overall impression of performance, promoteability
of employee, existing capabilities and qualifications of
performing jobs, strengths and weaknesses and training
needs of the employee. Advantage It is extremely
useful in filing information gaps about the employees
that often occur in a better-structured checklist.
Disadvantages It its highly dependent upon the writing
skills of rater and most of them are not good writers.
They may get confused success depends on the memory
power of raters.
3. Rating Scale
Rating scales consists of several numerical scales
representing job related performance criterions such as
dependability, initiative, output, attendance, attitude etc.
Each scales ranges from excellent to poor. The total
numerical scores are computed and final conclusions are
derived. Advantages Adaptability, easy to use, low cost,
every type of job can be evaluated, large number of
employees covered, no formal training required.
Disadvantages Raters biases
4. Checklist method
Under this method, checklist of statements of traits of
employee in the form of Yes or No based questions is
prepared. Here the rater only does the reporting or
checking and HR department does the actual evaluation.
Advantages economy, ease of administration, limited
training required, standardization. Disadvantages Raters
biases, use of improper weighs by HR, does not allow
rater to give relative ratings
5.Ranking Method
The ranking system requires the rater to rank his
subordinates on overall performance. This consists in
simply putting a man in a rank order. Under this method,
the ranking of an employee in a work group is done
against that of another employee. The relative position of
each employee is tested in terms of his numerical rank. It
may also be done by ranking a person on his job
performance against another member of the competitive
group.
Advantages of Ranking Method
Employees are ranked according to their
performance levels.
It is easier to rank the best and the worst
employee.
Limitations of Ranking Method
The whole man is compared with another
whole man in this method. In practice, it is very difficult
to compare individuals possessing various individual
traits.
This method speaks only of the position where an
employee stands in his group. It does not test anything
about how much better or how much worse an employee
is when compared to another employee.
When a large number of employees are working,
ranking of individuals become a difficult issue.
There is no systematic procedure for ranking
individuals in the organization. The ranking system does
not eliminate the possibility of snap judgements.