A BRIEF THEORY OF TIME

Hypothesis

Aleksander Uzunov

last addition to the April 11, 2004

newtimetheory.com

The principle of uncertainty of Heisenberg showed that we can accurately measure the state
of a system, which is why we can not predict exactly what will be its future behavior. Solely
it is possible to predict probabilities of various outputs. Exactly this particular element of
chance disturbed Einstein so much. He refused to believe that the physical laws can not make
a definite unambiguous prediction of what might happen. But no matter how we express it,
the whole evidence is that quantum phenomena and the uncertainty principle are unavoidable
and they are observed in every branch of physics.
Stephen Hawking
Without having big pretentions, in these few pages I will try to describe my views concerning
time, speed, movement and the interesting (to me) conclusions, to which I have come to.
The reason for this was an article, published previously in the magazine "Cosmos"1 (X.1994.).
It was about the so-called arrow of time, the author was Stephen Hawking. Then I asked
myself whether the "arrow of time" is the right name? This would mean that the time is
running smoothly and evenly, but:
"In the nature there are no variations only where we have not sought." ("Resonance
isomorphic principle" - K.Tomov 2).
I will allow myself one more quote:
"Even in 1905 Einstein taught the physicists, that time and space are not independent
concepts, but an indivisible whole space-time." ("Life in Science" - M. White, E. Gribbin).
Actually something, which due to lack of a better definition, is compared with the flight of an
arrow, gives an impression of a long straight line with eventual beginning and end. The
problem is that this line would look somewhat out of place in a picture, composed entirely
by the complex and varying curves of space and matter. Exactly those thoughts led me to
the idea, described below.
First, let us imagine for a moment that the whole Universe appears and disappears, so it was
always so, so it is, and so it will be. Nothing prevents us from trying, right? To quote Isaac
Asimov: "We have no reason to consider that this is not so." ("Gravitational collapse of the
Universe").
Why? Because we can not detect a similar phenomenon with our senses. We could not see
it, because our eyes vanish together with all our surrounding world. There is no device, no
matter how sensitive it is, to register it for the same reasons. We do not know how long we
are "here" and how long "somewhere", or rather "nowhere." That is, according to our
1
2

Bulgarian scientific magazine

Bulgarian physicist

1 - 16

concepts the time between the intervals and the intervals themselves for an outside
observer might be from part of a second to millions of years.
One thing we can say with certainty, namely:
Whenever we are "here" we are different from the previous one, i.e. there is a change.
(Conclusion 1)
And another thing, which for the time being we will accept as true:
The difference between two adjacent intervals is the smallest possible change.
(Conclusion 2)
It sounds almost absurd, since it would mean that when we are "here" we will be, generally
speaking, absolutely motionless, then we are "nowhere", then again "here", but more
different. That is, each particle occupies a new position, or in other words, moves, but on
the smallest possible distance. Like a movie. The tape rolls, the frames change twenty-four
times per second. But when we watch a movie, we dont see the transitions as the eyes that
otherwise do a good job, are quite imperfect. In fact, we like the movie characters, move
"portionwise", but apparently our frames are much more. In principle, it would look like:
Matter

Space
Fig. 1

The appearances are depicted as points, because this follows from the second conclusion. In
this perspective, this means, that MOTION IN THE UNIVERSE IS NOT EXISTS. But how if
everything is moving? This requires the definition of two major systems (levels), depending
entirely and solely on each other. The first system is any one of the points plotted in Fig.1. It
is not subject to laws, involving movement. It identifies them by its strictly defined
geometric structure. The accumulating energy is released in the form of impulse (interval),
after which comes the next equilibrium (point). The second system represents an aggregate
of all the successive phases of the first, or:
The time is not a phenomenon that depends just on the speed of movement, it is a
movement. (Conclusion 3)
Let us imagine a clock. This is a device that tells us the time. There is a spring, which drives
the gears and their speed is determined by a specific anchor mechanism. All watches in the
world are adjusted so that the arrow on the seconds hand makes one round for exactly one
minute. The concepts of second, minute, hour, etc. are defined by a world measurement
system and represent a given amount of time. Determined from us. If the watch starts
moving faster or slower, we say it is broken and take it to a watchmaker. But more
interesting is the case, when we want to make the watch works at a different speed.
We know that there are no motionless things. Someone would say: "Every night my car is
absolutely motionless in the parking lot." I will remind this person that it is not only moving,
but it revolves around the axis of the Earth at a speed of 465 m/sec. In turn, the Earth turns

2 - 16

around the Sun, and it is a part of the galaxy, called "Milky Way", which also rotates and on
top of this it goes somewhere. God only knows what is the direction of the car at any
moment, as well as the total speed of all movements, but it is not difficult to guess that it is
huge. From now on, if we want to slow down our clock, we have to listen to Einstein and
accelerate it at a speed, approaching that of the light relative to our reference system. And if
our arguments so far are correct, it will appear and disappear less times than if it is
motionless relative to the Earth3. The opposite case is also logical, i.e. the Universe does not
appear and disappear simultaneously, as the vibrations (let's call them so) of each separate
body are defined by its speed relative to the absolute zero speed. From everything said here
follows that:
Time is change and depends on the frequency of vibration of a given fragment of the
space. (Conclusion 4)
We know that time is determined by the movement, therefore:
The length of the intervals defines space and depends on the energy. Their number for a
certain fragment of space defines the time. Both variables depend on speed. And the
relationship between them we will call time factor (TF). Factor, because it will be a
variable, ranging from a minimum critical speed to a maximum critical speed 4.
(Conclusion 5)
Under critical speed I do not mean speed limit, but only the limits for realization of a certain
condition, e.g. the Universe that we know.
If we define the speed not as covered distance for a certain time, but as a frequency of
vibrations, depending on the energy of motion of a fragment of space (lower frequency,
higher speed), we will see that this is the definition of time, i.e.:
Time is equal to the speed towards the absolute zero speed. (Conclusion 6).
Now we can build a coordinate system where X is time-speed, beginning at zero and Y is the
time ratio.

Y
TF max

X1

X
Fig. 2

3
4

According to Conclusion 1
2 3 of Fig. 2

3 - 16

The curve represents the Universe. An area of it is the Universe that we know (we observe),
i.e. we can not directly observe other parts of the curve. If we take a point of the area
between X2 and X3 and position it on the left or right, we will get the picture, examined by
Einstein and which we can foresee, using the time factor. And if we try to play, sooner or
later we will come to misunderstandings, like the principle of uncertainty of Heisenberg.
With regard to the speed of light, it is a constant, but only if we consider it from a certain
area of the curve, i.e. we can assume that c is a difference in speeds of motion. Similar is
the importance of all other constants, such as absolute zero (for temperature), as well as the
ratios of weight to volume (density) and others.
The intervals b, defined by the energy of motion, does not imply a smooth change in its
value. It follows, that the curve in Figure 2 is a sequence of lines, parallel to the x. Their
length is directly proportional to TF. And the distance between them, in the curve, expressed
with space, is inversely proportional to the TF ( but if this applies to the mass of bodies, do
we have reason to doubt its change?).
To examine the curve and especially its beginning and end, it is necessary to make a second
assumption, which will assume to be true, concerning the mechanism of vibration. We know
that the particles consist of quarks and that the interactions between them are carried by
gluons. Let this be the starting point. The problem is that under standard observations
(accelerator-particle) a single quark can not be detected, and as we will see later, a single
quark will never be detected. Why?
Let's imagine that the whole space (ether) consists of gluons, with absolute zero speed5,
equally spaced, i.e. they represent a kind of crystalline structure. In this case what should
quarks do? To "assemble" around a gluon in the form of particle and obeying of the
movement, to "disassemble", flying to the next (Fig. 3). And regarding how many gluons will
be jumped over depends on the energy, illustrated by the time factor and on whether there
are gluons busy with other quarks (important).
TF takes the form: TF

f (a)
, where a is the distance between two neighboring gluons
b

and b is the number of intervals (vibrations, frequency of matter).

Fig. 3
5

0 from the graph in Fig. 2

4 - 16

Since there is a power that makes quarks assemble around a gluon, the same force will
remove part of their energy of motion, when they jump over gluons. Or the question of the
first law of mechanics stays open. If we follow the considerations up to now, it turns out that
any "independent" body moves with constant deceleration (Conclusion 7), i.e. the factor of
time tends to zero.
It is important to note that the TF, tending to zero, means that it is increased to the
maximum factor of time: TFmax =1, depicting the beginning of the curve, where x1 is the
lowest possible speed (Fig. 2). What would happen to such a body?
The energy of motion decreases gradually and at given moment (X1) for zero time it will be
transformed into another type of matter that I would call matter of
first kind. The mechanism follows the gravity between quarks and gluons. We need to
include a new factor - rotation of the bodies.
In how many directions can one body rotate? And what is the minimum to exist in the
known form of matter that is subject to gravity? The answer is: at least two (maybe more)
around the intersection of the axis of rotation. The beauty and importance of the rotation
consists in the fact that no matter how insignificant is the difference in the speed between
the center and the periphery, it still exists, i.e. some particles, thanks to the fact that they
occupied gluons have the opportunity to influence to others, while they "do not exist,
increasing the path of their quarks in the space, and we can add value, corresponding to the
minimum speed of rotation, depending on the TF. I think it will not be too boldly to say that:
The gravity is not a force, but a phenomenon, resulting from the rotation of the objects 6. It
is defined by the ratio between mass and speed. (Conclusion 8)
This means that each body, that stops moving, will be transformed into super-dense matter,
i.e. all neighboring gluons will be occupied. (But what if it does not stop and does not rotate
fast enough?). The body will be characterized by an absolute zero velocity - time, absolute
density, neutral with respect to gravity, i.e. zero body. On the other hand, such a body
would have produced a giant gluon vortexes in the presence of dispersion of the gluon heap
or other reasons, such as own movement.
Each body, located in a system with another body, keeps the rotation of the whole system,
since the gravitation becomes at an angle, determined by own rotation of each body, i.e.
each system can be considered as a body 7.

Regarding the right side of the graph.

At a given moment at a certain speed TF equal to zero will occur, i.e. within a space
fragment the energy of movement exceeds the energy of gravitation quarks-gluons or, in
other words zero intervals. From a mathematical point of view this would be the end of the
matter and probably is. Oppositely is a factor, determined by the choice of the length of a
certain line, multiple of the distance between two neighboring gluons. TF takes the form

nf (a )
0 , where n is the number of subsequent lines of space sufficient for b 1 .
b
6
7

see Ch. gravity

Leading (central)body sets a uniform geometric plane of the whole system either solar or star (galaxies).

5 - 16

TF can not equal zero outside the beginning of the coordinate system.

LEVELS OF REFLECTION
and the principle of uncertainty
Let us divide the Universe into parts or rather into levels of reflection. At the first level we
study everything from the elementary particles downwards, and the second level involves
them, plus everything else - atoms, molecules, apples (and all of neither alive nor dead
cats8), stars, etc. or:
- First level - movement;
- Second level - interactions and the total lack of movement, concerning the elementary
particles, i.e. the electron is an electron only when exists and it does not apply to the first
level. And the interactions, determining the powers we know, are
states of matter in the right area (due to the rotation of the bodies) in Fig. 2, applied to the
left;
- Third level - a total of subsequent states of second level, the difference between which is
the smallest possible change.
Or the phenomenon, in which an apple fell on Newton's head, is possible to monitor only at
the third level of reflection. At second level we will have to study billions of apples, hanging
over billion Newtons and at first ....? At the first level there is no Newton, no apples, no
problem, only quarks and gluons.

MULTIPLE PRINCIPLE
The location of the occupied gluons in the given segment (multiple of the distance between
two neighboring gluons) is very important. Whether it is where the quarks will assemble or
on their way.
In the first case a delay or stroke will occur depending on whether the occupied gluon is
currently occupied or the ones occupying it will go, or are in a stable steady state at that
time. The geometric arrangement determines the direction and the action - bouncing,
dissociation (annihilation), deceleration, acceleration. In this way a transformation into
another particle (e.g. pion in muon) is possible. In the second case will occur displacement in
space, respectively TF, but without any change in its value.
This principle (maybe it will not be a mistake if we call it multiple) could be used in the
description and explanation of phenomena, such as transparency of bodies, friction,
tunneling effect, wave function, the photo effect, chemical and mechanical solutions and
reactions, i.e. to foresee for example, color, smell and even the taste of particular
compound, diffusion, Brownian motion, decomposition of light, adiabatic processes,
radioactivity, and all other which do not come to my mind now, or in other words, the whole
Universe.

VERTIGINOUS ABYSS OF THE TOTAL ENLIGHTENMENT

From "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" - Douglas Adams

We are talking about the famous Schrdinger's cat.

6 - 16

Proceeding from the multiple principle, we can ask a question, that would finally lead to a
nervous breakdown of Leon Lederman9, and I confess this will give me real pleasure,
especially if my quantum abuses prove themselves to be quantum acceptable. So - is there
parallel worlds? If we follow the reasonings up to now, we will see that the answer is set in
the very beginning.
It is only necessary to formulate it (as far as we can afford it). The only thing, which can be
stated for now is, that the number of parallel dimensions is inversely proportional to TF.
Figure 4 is the final version of Figure 2, where Z displays the number of the possible
dimensions, but there is no guarantee of physical existence of all mathematical assumptions.

Fig. 4

Each dimension has a curve of TF, identical to that in Figure 2 with the corresponding
beginning. And theoretically, the dimensions, extrapolated one upon the other in a twodimensional coordinate system, for given TF value, will be at the smallest possible distance
from each other (Figure 5). Equal to the distance between two neighboring gluons. Their
number is determined by the lowest possible value of TF, if there is any limit at all.
We have to distinguish between parallel dimensions and multiple dimensions. In the first
case we examine different curves with a common beginning. In the second case we examine
different areas of the curve in Figure 2.

Parallel dimensions
The distance, expressed with a space between two successive states of a body or particle,
considered in the second level of reflection, represents a line with occupied gluons at its
ends and free gluons along its extension. The length of the line depends on TF in an inverse
proportional relationship. The free gluons can be occupied by the quarks of another body or
particle without their interaction, i.e. they are not directly observable from one another

in the occasion of "Dancing masters Moo-Shu"

7 - 16

(Figure 5). When TF is equal or close to one, the parallel dimensions intersect, i.e. they have
a common beginning.
Multiple dimensions
Bodies or particles with different TF are characterized by different distances between two
subsequent states at the second level of reflection. Therefore, they are not directly
observable from one another. Intersections (interactions and breaches in the multiple
principle) are possible in certain ratios in the lengths of the segments. The zones of
intersection (Fig. 6) are the reason why we see e.g., the light10 and more precisely its
quantisation, wavelength and decomposition.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

zn
z5
z4
z3
z2
z1

.
. .
. . .
. . . .

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

. . . .
. . .
. .
.

na
Distances between two successive states of
matter in the second level of reflection for a TF

Fig. 5
Areas of intersection

f
e
d
c
b
a

Fig. 6

Quarks and gluons

It is important to note that in these pages I use the word gluon. I can not guarantee that this
is the exact word or particle. The purpose is simply to create a model in which the names do
not matter. Highly conditional is also the scheme gluon - quarks. That, which we accepted as
true, is really difficult to believe. I explained it to myself in the following way: gluons consist
of at least three particles, arranged and connected like a water molecule. One of them draws
up the quarks (if it is force, then it is in the basis of some of the known ones) and the other
two are with different poles relative to one another. Their eternal rotation provides
perpetual rotation and also keeping the same distance, i.e. pressure11. We can not suppose
why they rotatd, but we can assume that the Universe is not infinite, and is limited in the
heaping of gluons, like the water molecules in a drop of water in weightlessness.

10

Elektromagnetizam, radioactivity, etc.

11

This, of course, contradicts the statement that heap dissipates. I am for dissipation.

8 - 16

In fact, even as a supposition, this is silly and it would save us a lot, if we do not pay
attention to this problem now. However, the nature of such gluon heaping generates
interest and raises questions that can not be avoided. Is the volume of the cluster variable
and if so, does it increases as a result of pressure?
If the answers are positive, then we go back to the statement that each "independent" body
moves with constant deceleration. But if we assume that the Universe has a beginning,
expressed in the forming of the gluon heap, subject to disipation, then the interaction
quarks - gluons, particles - bodies, leads to relativity of motions. Or:
Any independent body is moving with constant equidelay in relation to the first law of
mechanics and with constant equi-acceleration relative to the disipation of the heap.
(Conclusion 9)
Both statements do not have relations and direct dependence on one another. Anyway, the
concept gluon heap presupposes that the lowest TF value still has its limit, bounded by the
limits of the volume.
Whether the gluons are relatively stationary to one another or "dissipate", it does not mean
that the whole heaping is not moving in the tremendously infinite, infinitely tremendous,
dimensionless spaceless, speck-like void. If this is true, it will turn out that the concept of
absolute zero speed is a temporary concept, characterized by infinity from all points of view.
Mr. Adams, your "dizzying abyss of absolute insight" works.
For me, the comparison seems enough. Yet, the inevitable question arises: is there a reason
why there are no other similar heapings and what is the role of God in all this? HE has His
place, but maybe it's time to move His throne elsewhere.
Anyway, there are probably an infinite number of similar heapings, infinite number of
"eggs", moving at infinite speeds out of time, which are likely to collide, and thus start a new
Universe12. But this for the time being is beyond our knowledge.

GRAVITY

A body at the second level of reflection (interactions and complete lack of movement)
results, as expressed here, in disorders in the geometric arrangement, or in other words, in
the homogeneity of the surrounding gluons (outside the volume of the body). This suggests
the formation of particular "gluon vortexes" due to inertia, if we assume,that the gluon heap
is moving in the VOID. The vortexes lead to a bending of the space. They are characterized
by considerable differences in the distances between neighboring gluons in relation to all
the others in the heap. Statement, that excludes gravity. Every subsequent state of the body
at the second level of reflection moves the vortexes radially round itself due to the rotation.
If we examine the same body in a third level of reflection, we will observe what we used to
call gravitational field.
Areas, containing gluon vortexes, change the common TF of an intersecting body
(deformation) or: TF

f ( ga)
, where g is a coefficient, indicating the difference in the
b

distances between neighboring gluons. It depends on the mass and velocity of a body or
system of bodies. The mass is determined by the inertia due to " catching" of quarks by
12

Definitely the "Big Bang" theory has never appealed to me.

9 - 16

gluons. The force of gravity and the size of mass should depend on the speed of movement
in inverse proportion, i.e. mass decreases, and does not increase as per the predictions of
the Theory of relativity. Anyway, the problem of anti-gravity can be defined and therefore
solved.

Section of the gravitational field

It is mainly determined by two factors. The total direction of movement and the direction of
dispersion of the gluon heap. If we examine the section in a plane at the third level of
reflection, its shape will be approximately as shown in Fig. 7. At various points of the section
the factor will be different. The shape changes due to the orbital motion of each body. The
mess becomes full, when we take into account the deformation of the body under the
influence of foreign gluon vortexes.

overall direction of
movement of the body

direction of the dispersion of

the gluon heap

change in the angle between the vectors as a result of the orbital motion

Fig. 7

ELECTRONS
It is considered that they, and the entire family of leptons, are indivisible matter (not
containing any other particles). If this is true, everything said up to now will collapse. This of
course is not excluded, but there are enough examples of the behavior of electrons, which
require its ability to divide13. From another point of view, it can be regarded as indivisible,
but then it should be interchangeable, which is a very interesting possibility, i.e. it may
happen that the atomic nucleus "captures" on its way electrons, interacts with them and
"abandons" them, flying to the next ones. Anyway, this is not a determining factor for the
root of this hypothesis.
In my opinion the probabilistic interpretation of the wave function is valid, but is not
important, because it is a look at the Universe, affecting only and solely the third level of
reflection. Besides, "God does not play dice" (Albert Einstein).
Using the standard model of the atom, but not taking into consideration the accepted laws
and evidences, and with the risk to expose myself completely, I think that the status of a
13

I recently came across the following interesting article: http://phys.org/news/2015-05-electron.html

10 - 16

given macro system is identified mainly with the state of the atomic nucleus. The argument
is that the electron covers a considerably greater distance in space than the atom, which
results in differences in the TF values (or perhaps identical values, but with different
"tension" due to the forced interactions). It can be assumed that nucleus and electron have
divergent or almost divergent existence i.e. as much as to affect each other regarding the
directions of interaction (vector interactions). In other words, they are always playing the
games tag and hide and seek. A result of their game is the atomic model with defining speed
and direction of movement. The orbits of electrons should not be circular. If we can observe
the movement of the particles of the atom into the space, they would follow the trajectory
of the broken DNA helix. By the way, this analogy makes me to ask myself about link
between DNA and astrology. But that's another topic.
Almost the diverging existence (I use it as a term) for me is the reason for the
misunderstanding, called leptons. As for the atomic model, I think the atom represents a
moving core with an expanding rotating twisted tail, on which the electrons are located.
MOLECULES
Similarly to the above-described model the vector interactions are determining both in the
system of a single atom, and in the system of the group of atoms, forming a molecule.
Where the nucleus of an atom exercise electro magnetic interaction with the electrons with
another atom. Again it comes to the multiple principle.

ELECTROMAGNETISM
When moving the atomic nucleus causes gluon vortexes, sufficient to determine the
behavior of the electrons, deforming their trajectory in a given direction. A second factor is
the shrinking of group, comprising needed number of gluons in the volume of core by
grouping of the quarks. Created area of discharged and grouped gluons in certain structures
determines the overall interaction between atoms, including strong and weak nuclear
interactions. I am cosidering that this creates the solid matter.

ZERO BODIES AND SUPERNOVAS

Matter of the first kind - characterized by absolute zero speed, i.e. lack of free gluons within
the volume, zero time, zero gravity (or one-way, depending on the direction of dispersion of
the gluon heap), absolute density, absolute transparency. Such a body can not be hit or
touched by another body (particle), because it will pass through it and the energy of gravity
between its quarks and gluons will be transformed completely into energy of motion.
Depending on the volume of the zero body and TF of the moving body, it (the moving body)
in zero time will receive a new considerably lower TF or will be transferred in another
dimension, or both. I.e. it comes to teleportation.
Moreover, it is still necessary to realize the scale of the show, if we succeed experimentally
to "push" such a body, characterized by zero. At least we will have to look for it somewhere
on the right side of the curve of TF. I assume that the same will happen if the moving body is
big enough and the transformed energy is greater than the energy of the Zero, i.e. at a

11 - 16

certain ratio between the volume of zero body, mass and the TF of the moving body. Or how
big can be the largest bodies?
STARS
Let's look at a body, which "decided" to become a star. As a result of the gravitation,
somewhere in the intersection of the axis of rotation, the pressure is big enough to upset
the geometric arrangement of matter. The result is breaching in the multiple principle,
which is high enough for teleportation to take place on the smallest distance of a matter to a
neighboring area in the body itself, where the density is not so high. The teleported matter,
keeping its parameters at the time of materialization, is able to disrupts the multiple
principle in the given section. The result is a chain reaction, but not on nuclear level, but at
the level of quarks, where the energies are much larger, i.e., we can not speak about
concepts such as exhausting of star fuel. And the losses of matter are expressed by different
types of radiations, determined by the multiple principle at the time of their formation
(defined by the TF, speed, pressure, depending on the mass and radius), i.e. it can be
assumed, that at the various points of the radius of the body respond different waves
(radiation).
Taking into account the level of processes in stars, it can be assumed that these are bodies,
existing in more than one dimension, i.e. in our Solar system the planets may be more.
BLACK HOLES
If a given body has the common features of a black hole, it inevitably would "ignite", in order
to continue its life as a star. But in this case why would one star waste time to collapse, i.e.
there are no black holes, except for Schrdinger's cat. The bodies, whose behavior we
describe as black holes are actually bodies with TF close to one.
MATTER AND LIGHT
If we accept the zero bodies as matter of First kind, the moving bodies as matter of the
Second, we can consider the light as matter of the Third kind, situated far to the right side of
the chart.
We said that all moving bodies move with constant deceleration caused by the "friction"
with the gluons (which surely keeps own, unstrained temperature of each body, depending
on the density and TF, which means that the Earth will not cool down). The particles, which
compose matter of the Second kind, consist of three quarks, and the photon of two. Then it
can be assumed that at sufficiently low TF the matter "drops" a given quark (?), i.e. every
body at a low enough TF scatters to photons, examining it from the position of our part of
the curve. It is interesting what would happen if we can delay the light and examine the
"filling up" of photons with quarks. In other words - spectral alchemy.

IN SEARCH FOR ALIEN INTELLIGENCE

In the context of what was said here, if I am a representative of an alien developed
civilization, the last thing I would use for interstellar communication, is radio waves.

12 - 16

I think that the efforts need to be focused on developing methods for capturing and delaying
of particles at a speed, greater than the speed of the light.

GLOSSARY
of used concepts
________________________________________
Gluons - I use this word to create a mental model, in which the names do not matter, and
the scheme gluons - quarks is highly conditional;
Gluon heap - assembling of gluons that form the Universe we know within its volume;
Gluon vortexes - due to the inertia of a body in the conditions of second level of reflection
gluon vortexes are formed, characterized by significant differences in the distances between
neighboring gluons to the rest in the heap. They are positioned radially, as a result of the
rotation of the bodies. It can be described as a twist in space;
Gravity - a phenomenon, in which areas, containing gluon vortexes, change the common TF
of a body intersecting them or: TF

f ( ga)
, where g is a ratio, indicating the difference in
b

the distances between neighboring gluons;

Limits of critical speed - limits for realization of a certain condition, for example - the
Universe (the dimension), that we know;
A fragment of space - multiple of the distance between two neighboring gluons;
Law of conservation of time - similar to the Law of conservation of energy and the inevitable
consequence of what has been said in these pages;
Areas of intersection - multiple intersecting points between different areas in the TF curve,
defining the interactions within the known forces (phenomena);
Time factor (TF) - The length of the intervals defines the space and depends on energy. Their
number for a certain fragment of space defines the time. Both variables depend on speed.
And the relationship between them is the factor of time. Acquires a common type:

f (a)
, where a is the distance between two neighboring gluons, b is the number of
b

intervals (vibration, frequency of matter). TF can not equal to zero outside the beginning of
the coordinate system.
Multiple principle - all distances in the Universe are multiple of the distance between two
neighboring gluons, all interactions obey the geometrical structure of arrangement of the
gluons and their ocupation;
Matter - finally its description is limited to drawing three functions, forming the character of
the TF curve (Fig. 2);

13 - 16

 matter of the first kind - zero matter, characterized by absolute zero speed, i.e.
lack of free gluons within the volume, zero time, zero gravity (or unidirectional,
depending on the direction of dispersion of the heap), absolute density, absolute
transparency, or: TF

f (a)
0
b

matter of the second kind: TF

f (a)
0
b

matter of the third kind - light or:

nf (a )
0 where n is the number of
b

consecutive fragments of the space, enough for b 1

Tremendously infinite, infinitely tremendous, dimensionless spaceless, speck-like void - or

THE NOTHING, so well described in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy";
Teleportation - unforced - the way of particles / bodies between two subsequent states at
the second level of reflection, when it refers to the first law of mechanics; forced - any other
conditions, specified by breaching of the multiple principle, such as: moving in time, moving
in space, other dimension, parallel dimension;
Levels of reflection or rather - philosophical concept, which implies division of viewpoints,
where:
first level - movement;
second level - interactions and the total lack of movement, concerning the elementary
particles;
third level - a total of subsequent states of second level; the difference between them
is the smallest possible change;

14 - 16

EXPERIMENTS
proposals for conducting experiments with predictable result in support of the hypothesis "A Brief Theory of Time"

1. If to the standard setting for monitoring the photoelectric effect, as shown in FIG. 8, a
second cloud chamber is added, there is reason to assume that in chamber 2 teleported
particles will be monitored. The distance L is constant value, which is in direct dependence
on TF (probably several meters). It is necessary to take into account (experimentally) the
angle between the L vector and the lighting vector. The barrier does not matter.

camera 2
camera 1
barrier
Fig. 8

2. A similar experiment can be made with a Geiger counter, where the experimental unit
can be put in terms of violations of the multiple principle (ex. - hammer stroke).

3. A hammer stroke is a good example of a breach of the multiple principle. Probably,

experiment number 3 is the easiest to implement. A hammer can be replaced with a
hammer drilling machine (drill), where the drill beats a metal surface. Also a mobile cloud
chamber is needed. The purpose of the experiment, as in the aforementioned two, is to
show teleported particles. The initial distance should be constant and to appears at certain
changing intervals in the space.

4. A body is placed in a strong enough electromagnetic field and possesses enough high
revolutions (acceleration) of rotation around its axis, situated at an angle to the magnetic
field lines (Fig. 9). It is necessary to conform the x-axis with the magnetic field lines of the
Earth and her mass, as well as those of the body.
Such conditions suggest breaking of the multiple principle, which are expressed, at certain
values of in: forced radioactivity or vice versa, moving in time and / or space, other
dimension, parallel dimension. I would not comment on possible applications of such a
method. And I believe that God would not allow us such a thoughtless intervention in the
Universe.

15 - 16

Fig. 9

5. Synthesis of extremely unstable isotopes under absolutely identical conditions, but at

different latitude would determine different duration of their lives. Most likely it has been
already ascertained.
6. Space probe with specific diameter, length and mass. At various ratios between the main
parameters and speed of movement and position relative to the direction of movement,
there should be variable own radiation.

16 - 16