Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 39

STUDENT PORTFOLIO

CONTENTS:
(1)

FACULTYS VISION & MISSION

(2)

PROGRAMME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES


(PEO)

(3)

PROGRAMME OUTCOMES (PO)

(4)

PROGRAMME OUTCOME MATRIX


! Bachelor of Engineering (Honours) Mechanical
EM220 (Structure D)
! Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering (Manufacturing) (Honours)
EM221/241

(5)

PROGRAMME OUTCOME RUBRICS


(PO1 PO12)

(6)

PROGRAMME OUTCOME - BASED ASSESSMENT


FORM

STUDENT PORTFOLIO

(1) FACULTYS VISION &


MISSION

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

VISION
A leader in the mechanical engineering
discipline towards global excellence
through world class education and
research.

MISSION
To produce graduates with strong
mechanical engineering fundamentals,
analytical and leadership skills,
competitive, creative, innovative and
professional ethics.

STUDENT PORTFOLIO

(2) PROGRAMME
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
(PEO)

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

PROGRAMME EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES (PEO)
Specific goals consistent with the
mission and vision of the Institute of
Higher Learning (IHL) are responsive
to the expressed interest of
programme stakeholders, describing
expected achievements of graduates in
their career and professional life.
PEO 1 - Engineers adapt and
transform the acquired knowledge
in public and private sectors with
respect to related professional
fields.
(KPI: 70% employers satisfaction on alumni
career progression; 25% of alumni holding
leadership position having authority and
subordinates)

PEO 2 - Engineers are expert and


competent in their professional
fields.

(KPI: 5% of alumni are registered professional


engineers or engineering experts or
equivalent
after
five
(5)
years
of
employment; 70% of alumni work in related
engineering job functions)

PEO 3 - Engineers are globally


competitive
and
professionally
employed
in
multinational/international
organizations.
(KPI:
30%
of
alumni
work
multinational/international companies
equivalent international levels)

in
or

PEO 4 - Engineers practice ethical


and professional values in their
respective fields.
(KPI: 90% of stakeholders/respondents are
satisfied with alumni ethical and professional
values)

STUDENT PORTFOLIO

(3) PROGRAMME OUTCOMES


(PO)

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

PROGRAMME OUTCOMES (PO)


PO
PO1
PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11

PO12

DESCRIPTION
Able to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals
and an engineering specialisation to the solution of complex engineering
problems
Able to identify, formulate, research literature and analyse complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated
conclusions using first
principles of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering sciences
Able to design solutions for complex engineering problems and design
systems, components or processes that meet specified needs with appropriate
consideration for public health and safety, cultural, societal, and environmental
considerations
Able to conduct investigation into complex problems using research-based
knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and
interpretation of data, and synthesis of information to provide valid
conclusions
Able to create, select and apply appropriate techniques resources, and modern
engineering and IT tools, including prediction and modelling, to complex
engineering activities, with an understanding of the limitations
Able to apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal,
health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities
relevant to professional engineering practice
Able to understand the impact of professional engineering solutions in societal
and environmental contexts and demonstrate knowledge of and need for
sustainable development
Able to apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and
responsibilities and norms of engineering practice
Able to communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large, such as being able to
comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make
effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions
Able to function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams and in multi-disciplinary settings
Able to recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage
in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological
change
Able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of
engineering and
management principles and apply these to ones own work (including as an
entrepreneur), as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in
multidisciplinary environments
NOTE :

C - Cognitive
P Psychomotor
A - Affective

EDUCATIONAL
DOMAIN
C
C

P
A
A
A
A
P
P

STUDENT PORTFOLIO

(4) PROGRAMME OUTCOME


Matrix

Fakulti Kejuruteraan Mekanikal

PO-PEO MAPPING
Bachelor of Engineering (Hons.) Mechanical - EM220
Bachelor of Mech. Engineering (Manufacturing) (Hons.) - EM221

PO Description

PO1
Able to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals and an engineering
specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems;
PEO1

PEO2

multinational/international
organizations.
(KPI: 30% of alumni work in
Engineers
practice
ethical and
multinational
/international
professional
values
in their
companies or equivalent
respective
fields.
international
levels)
(KPI: 90% of stakeholders
/respondents are satisfied with
alumni ethical and professional
values)

Engineers adapt and transform


the acquired knowledge in public
and private sectors with respect
to related professional fields.
(KPI: 70% employers satisfaction
on alumni career progression
(Adapt); 25% of alumni holding
Engineers
are expert
and
leadership position
having
competent
in
their
professional
authority and subordinates)
fields.
(KPI: 5% of alumni are registered
professional engineers or
engineering experts or equivalent
after
five (5)
employment;
Engineers
areyears
globally
70% of alumni work in related
competitive and professionally
engineering
employed in job functions)

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

! Bachelor of Engineering (Honours) Mechanical EM220


! Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering (Manufacturing) (Honours) EM221/EM241
PEO Description

PEO3
PEO4

PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12

Able to identify, formulate, research literature and analyze complex engineering problems reaching
substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering
sciences;
Able to design solutions for complex engineering problems and design systems, components or
processes that meet specified needs with appropriate consideration for public health and safety,
cultural, societal, and environmental considerations
Able to conduct investigation into complex problems using research based knowledge and research
methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of
information to provide valid conclusions
Able to create, select and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT
tools, including prediction and modeling, to complex engineering activities, with an understanding of
the limitations
Able to apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and
cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to professional engineering practice.
Able to understand the impact of professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental
contexts and demonstrate knowledge of and need for sustainable development
Able to apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of
engineering practice.
Able to communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community
and with society at large, such as being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design
documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions
Able to function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams and in multidisciplinary settings.
Able to recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and
life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
Able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering and management principles and
apply these to ones own work (including as an entrepreneur), as a member and leader in a team, to
manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.

STUDENT PORTFOLIO

(5) PROGRAMME OUTCOME


Rubric (PO1 PO12)

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC


PROGRAM OUTCOME 1: Able to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals and an engineering specialisation to the solution of
complex engineering problems
PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA
i. Demonstrates specific
engineering knowledge
of course area.

POOR
(1)
Minimally understands and tries to
apply mathematical and scientific
principles toward solving engineering
problems.
Shows effort to evaluate and analyze
process(es) and/or data.

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)
Adequately understands and applies
mathematical and scientific principles
toward solving engineering problems.
Adequately evaluates and analyzes
process(es) and/or data.

(4)

EXCELLENT
(5)
Understands and applies
mathematical and scientific
principles toward solving
engineering problems.
Skilled at evaluating and analyzing
process(es) and/or data.

PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

POOR
(1)

ii. Demonstrates analysis


and judgment.

Tries to identify and understand issues


or problems.
Demonstrates deficiencies with
integrating information from other
sources to determine cause and effect
relationships.
Struggles to choose a course of action
or develop an appropriate solution.

Frequently identifies and understands


issues or problems.
Demonstrates potential to integrate
information from other sources to
determine cause and effects
relationships.
Chooses a reasonable course of action
or develops an appropriate solution.

Always identifies and understands


issues or problems.
Integrates information from many
sources to determine cause and
effects relationships.
Effectively chooses a course of action
or develops an appropriate solution.

iii. Demonstrates
knowledge of
mathematics.

Minimally understands the


mathematical and scientific principles
involved.

Adequately understands and applies


appropriate mathematics.
Handles algebra, trigonometry and
calculus with minor errors.

Understands and applies appropriate


mathematics.
Handles algebra, trigonometry and
calculus with minimal errors.

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

(4)

EXCELLENT
(5)

PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC


PROGRAM OUTCOME 2: Able to identify, formulate, research literature and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using
first principles of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering sciences;
PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

i. Writes, observes, and


listens with
comprehension and
critical perception.

POOR
(1)
Misunderstands basic meaning of the
concepts presented.
Fails to follow basic themes or
arguments and is not able to connect
them to existing knowledge.
Fails to recognize the credibility of
sources.

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

(2)

Understands basic meaning of the


concepts presented.
Follows themes and arguments,
and connects them to existing
knowledge.
Fairly recognize the credibility of
sources.

EXCELLENT
(5)

(4)

Understands fully the concepts


presented.
Expands on or evaluates themes
and arguments, and connects them
to existing knowledge.
Consistently recognize the
credibility of sources.

PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

POOR
(1)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

(2)

ii. Communicates clearly,


precisely, and in a wellorganized manner.

iii. Demonstrate a large


and varied vocabulary.

Unclear objectives, controlling ideas,


main points or argument.
Fails to use structure appropriate to
the discipline.
Each section is unrelated to other
paragraphs or sub-points and offer
inadequate or inappropriate examples
and evidence.
Poorly organized and structured
communication.
Fails to employ transition between
ideas
Fails to use or violates standards for
academic communication.

Poor selection of words and specific


terminology to explain the meaning of
context.
Incorrectly identifies the correct
meaning of many words within the
context.
Relies on repetition or limited diction

Fairly clear objectives, controlling


ideas, main point or argument.
Uses structure appropriate to the
discipline.
Each section develops a main idea,
offers examples and evidence, and
suggests some relationship to other
paragraphs and sub-points.
Fairly organized and structured
communication.
Generally employs some form of
transition between ideas.
Generally follows standards for
academic communication.

EXCELLENT
(5)

(4)

Fairly good selection of words and


specific terminology to explain the
meaning of context.
Generally identifies the correct
meaning of words within the context.
Uses a varied vocabulary to convey
ideas, using little ineffective repetition

Clear objectives, controlling ideas,


main points or argument.
Demonstrates creative and/or
effective command of disciplineappropriate structure.
Each section develops a main idea
carefully, makes thorough use of
appropriate examples and
evidence, and has a logical
relationship to other paragraphs
and sub-points.
Very organized and structured
communication
Consistently employs effective
transitions between ideas.
Consistently follows standards for
academic communications; shows
creativity in application of these
standards.
Very good selection of words and
specific terminology to explain the
meaning of context.
Consistently identifies the correct
meaning of words within the
context.
Consistently uses a rich and varied

PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

iv. Recognizes and use a


variety of
communication forms
and styles.

POOR
(1)

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

to convey ideas.
Misuses discipline-specific terminology
or basic vocabulary.

or limited diction.
Generally uses correct/appropriate
word choice and discipline-specific
terminology.

Inappropriate rhetoric form.


Does not understand the concept of
non-literal expression.

Fairly appropriate rhetoric form.


Recognizes non-literal expression, but
use may not always be appropriate.

v. Use computer
technologies or other
technologies for
communications.

Poor selection of software for


communicating informations or is
unable to use a computer to
communicate or compile information.
Unable to communicate information
using web pages and/or presentation
software.
Does not use basic email for
communication or fails to follow basic
email etiquette (netiquette) in
communications.

Fairly good selection of software for


communicating informations or is
unable to use a computer to
communicate or compile information
Communicates information using
basic features of web pages and/or
presentation software
Successfully uses email for
communication and follows basic
rules of email etiquette (netiquette)
in communications.

vi. Accommodate ideas


from members or

Poor justification of ideas.


Poor rationalization of ideas.

Fairly good justification of ideas.


Fairly good rationalization of ideas.

EXCELLENT
(5)

(4)

vocabulary to convey ideas.


Consistently uses
correct/appropriate word choice
and discipline-specific
terminology.

Very appropriate rhetoric form.


Recognizes and uses non-literal
expression appropriately and
effectively.

Very good selection of software


for communicating informations
or is unable to use a computer to
communicate or compile
information.
Communicates information using
advanced features of web pages
and/or presentation software.
Successfully uses some of the nonbasic features of email programs
(such as sending and receiving
attachments, setting up group
email lists, or organizing
mailboxes).

Very good justification of ideas

PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

POOR
(1)

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

others.

EXCELLENT
(5)

(4)

Very good rationalization of ideas.

vii.Multi-culture
communication.

Unable to present multi-culture


relation.

Able to present multi-culture relation.

Successfully present multi-culture


relation.

viii. Non verbal


communication.

Unable to use proper nonverbal


communication such as eye contacts,
body language and gesture.

Able to use nonverbal communication.

Successfully use nonverbal


communication.

PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC


PROGRAM OUTCOME 3: Able to design solutions for complex engineering problems and design systems, components or processes that meet specified needs
with appropriate consideration for public health and safety, cultural, societal, and environmental considerations
PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

POOR
(1)

i. Chooses appropriate
analytic and design
tools and models for
engineering problems.

Some evidence of the use analytical tools


and modeling for the problem.

Shows reasonable familiarity and use


of analytic tools and modeling.

Analysis and design tools used in the


problem are well-suited for the
problem.

ii. Demonstrates effective


practical and analytic
techniques in solving
engineering problems.

Uses some engineering skills to


determine problem solution.

Good use of engineering skills to


analyze and design a solution to the
problem.

Excellent ability to mix solid


engineering analysis with practical
design and implementation
considerations.

Identifies most of the major issues and


attempts to solve in an analytic manner.

Good ability to isolate the problem


and formulate a solution. Uses
engineering
approach to solve problems.

Demonstrates clear, sound reasoning


in identifying the underlying
engineering issues and formulating a
plan for solution.
Uses the appropriate engineering
analysis for each part of the problem.

iii. Shows depth of


knowledge in using
fundamental and
advanced engineering
approaches to
problems.

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

(4)

EXCELLENT
(5)

PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC


PROGRAM OUTCOME 4: Able to conduct investigation into complex problems using research based knowledge and research methods including design of
experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of information to provide valid conclusions
CTPS :

CRITICAL THINKING , PROBLEM SOLVING

PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

i.

Demonstrates specific
engineering knowledge of
subject area.

ii. Critical thinking.


Kim (CTPS 1)

POOR
(1)
Attempts to apply mathematical and
scientific principles to solution of open ended
engineering problems.
Assumptions are weak and the problem to be
solved is poorly laid out.
The solution methodology is unclear and
incorrect.

Seldom identifies and understands issues,


problems and opportunities.
Has difficulty gathering information and
drawing conclusions.

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)
Can apply mathematical and scientific
principles to solution of open ended
engineering problems.
Can make assumptions and reasonably
identify the problem to be solved.
The solution methodology is clear with
minor errors.
Often identifies and understands issues,
problems and opportunities.
Gathers and thinks about information and
offers responsible interpretations;
provides enough information to support
conclusions.

(4)

EXCELLENT
(5)
Can readily apply mathematical and
scientific principles to solution of open
ended engineering problems.
Can make appropriate assumptions and
clearly identify the problem to be solved.
The solution methodology is clear and
correct.
Always identifies and understands issues,
problems and opportunities.
Gathers and evaluates information,
chooses a clear interpretation, and
provides enough information (quality
and quantity) to support conclusions.

iii. Evaluate situation and


attempt to get point of
view.
(CTPS 2)

iv. Problem solving.

v. Assess own creativity.


(CTPS 3)
vi. Effective
communication in
identifying, formulating
and solving
engineering problems.

Needs assistance in evaluating situations.


Does not seek different points of view to
identify the root cause of a problem.

Sometimes uses effective approaches to


develop solutions.
Occasionally takes action inconsistent
with facts, constraints or probable
consequences.
With assistance, partially able to explain
a problem.
Usually relies on others to generate
suggestions.
Uses the same strategy most of the time.

Usually stresses major points and


follows a logical sequence.
Sometimes makes effective use of
modern presentation tools.
Occasionally uses terms, examples, and
graphs that is not meaningful to
audience.

Can assess situations and arrive at


objective evaluations.
Seeks different points of view and makes
evaluations, based on facts, to identify the
root cause of a problem.

Usually uses effective approaches to


develop solutions.
Normally takes action consistent with
facts, constraints and probably
consequences.
Independently able to explain a
problem.

Generates criteria needed to assess


situations and arrive at objective
evaluations.
Seeks different points of view and makes
evaluations, based on facts, to identify
the root cause of a problem; verifies
whether a solution works; and acts on
opportunities for improvement.

Repeatedly uses effective approaches


to develop solutions.
Unfailingly takes action consistent
with facts, constraints and probable
consequences.
Able to provide explanation of
problem, develop evaluated
solutions, and make
recommendations.

Suggests effective ways for getting a


job done.
Identifies a variety of strategies,
chooses an appropriate one, and
applies the strategy(ies) singly or in
combination.

Suggests and evaluates effective


solutions for getting a job done.
Compares a variety of strategies,
chooses the most effective, and
applies the strategy(ies) to improve
the situation.

Frequently stresses major points and


follows a logical sequence.
Often makes effective use of modern
presentation tools. Usually uses
terms, examples, and graphs that is
meaningful to audience.

Always stresses major points and


follows a logical sequence.
Frequently makes effective use of
modern presentation tools.
Repeatedly uses terms, examples,
and graphs that is meaningful to
audience.

PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC


PROGRAM OUTCOME 5: Able to create, select and apply appropriate techniques resources, and modern engineering and IT tools, including prediction and
modelling, to complex engineering activities, with an understanding of the limitations
PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

POOR
(1)

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

(4)

EXCELLENT
(5)

i. Identify Design
Problem and
Constraints.

Evidence of some understanding of the


problem, deficiencies will impact the
quality of the solution.

Basically sound understanding of the


problem and constraints, has missed
some key points.

Clear and complete identification of


the design goal and the constraints.

ii. Explores Alternative


Designs.

Single design presented or unreasonable


alternative presented.

Alternative approaches explored to a


limited depth.

Reasonable alternatives explored to


arrive at final design.

Minimal application and use of


appropriate tools.

Uses some analytic tools with


moderate effectiveness.

Selects appropriate tools and uses


them effectively in developing
design.

Contain substantial error in sustainable


analysis or analysis.

Reasonable sustainable analysis is


performed.
Adequately fulfill the sustainable
analysis requirement or constraint.

Effective usage of sustainable


analysis.
Fulfill exactly the sustainable
analysis requirement or constraint
imposed.

Missing major calculations or design


justification.

Incomplete-missing important
documentation or calculations.

Complete, well documented,


referenced final design.

iii. Uses analytic tools to


aid in design process
and support final
design.
iv. Evaluate the
sustainable aspect
(environmental issues,
safety & health and
cost).
v. Documented Final
Design.

PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC


PROGRAM OUTCOME 6: Able to apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the
consequent responsibilities relevant to professional engineering practice.
PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

POOR
(1)

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

(4)

EXCELLENT
(5)

i. Ability to communicate
and interact within
group member.

Unable to communicate and interact


with other member.

Shows willingness to participate but


shows moderate communication
skills.

Shows strong interest and


communicate effectively with group
member.

ii. Ability to understand


and take role as group
member and leader.

Unable to take role either as leader and


group member.

Occasionally demonstrates the


capability of taking different role.

Successfully shows the capability in


of taking role as leader and member.

iii. Ability to respect the


opinion and trust of
other group members.

Show intolerance of individual


difference and unwilling to accept
responsibility.

Recognizes, accept and tolerates


individual differences in group.

Willing to accept and tolerate


diversity of ideas and take
responsibility.

iv. Active participation


passive in group
decision making and
interactive.

Makes decisions hastily.


Needs encouragement to contribute
ideas.

Occasionally participate in group


decision making.

Very active and provide


encouragement of group members.

PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC


PROGRAM OUTCOME 7: Able to understand the impact of professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts and demonstrate
knowledge of and need for sustainable development
PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

POOR
(1)

i.

Understand the
implication of
economics, environment
and culture to the
professional practice.

Has been exposed to a code of ethics,


including professional behavior for
interaction with co-workers,
superiors, and clients, as well as the
general public.

ii.

Practice a professional
code of ethics for
engineers.

Unable to practice professional code


of practice.

iii. The handling of


proprietary information,
licensed software,
confidentiality, conflicts
of interest, citation of
sources, quotations, and
copyright.

Indicates that the students believe


that the impacts on society are worth
investigating but does not stress their
importance.

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

(4)

EXCELLENT
(5)

Has been exposed to a code of ethics,


including professional behavior for
interaction with co-workers,
superiors, and clients, as well as the
general public.

Has been exposed to a code of ethics,


including professional behavior for
interaction with co-workers,
superiors, and clients, as well as the
general public.

Demonstrates this understanding


through acceptable behavior on a
professional level activity.

Practice professional code of ethics


through exemplary conduct on a
professional level activity.

Clearly indicates the importance of


the impacts of technology on society.

Clearly indicates and stresses the


importance of the impacts of
technology on society and our need to
be concerned about them or explicitly
acknowledges the responsibility borne
by technologies for the effect of their
professional work on society.

PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

POOR
(1)

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

(4)

EXCELLENT
(5)

iv. The extent to which


discussion of the impact
of technology on society
reflected recognition of
the social responsibilities
of scientists and
engineers.

Indicates that the students believe


that the impacts on society are worth
investigating but does not stress their
importance.

Clearly indicates the importance of


the impacts of technology on society.

Clearly indicates and stresses the


importance of the impacts of
technology on society and our need to
be concerned about them or explicitly
acknowledges the responsibility borne
by technologies for the effect of their
professional work on society.

v. Safety and health issue

Needs considerable assistance with


safety practices and procedures; is not
aware of the acts that govern these.

Needs no assistance with using safety


practices and procedures.

Needs no assistance with using safety


practices and procedures; knows the
acts that govern these.

vi. Environmental aspects

Not stated any appreciation towards


the importance of environmental
concern.

Mostly effective in addressing


environmental issues.

Effective in addressing environmental


issues leading to a better result.

vii. Healthy, safety and risk


management

Demonstrate very little knowledge


and relationship in health, safety and
risk issues to design.
Partial or limited coverage of the
subject matter.

Demonstrate adequate knowledge and


relationship in health, safety and risk
issues to design.
Adequate and effective coverage of the
subject matter.

Demonstrated comprehensive
knowledge and relationship in health,
safety and risk issues to design.
Extensive and detailed coverage of
the subject matter.

viii. Evaluate solution for


sustainable development

Show no concern towards sustainable


development.

Sustainable development is well


mention.

Successfully address the importance of


sustainable development with
supporting result and discussion.

PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC


PROGRAM OUTCOME 8: Able to apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of engineering practice
PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

POOR
(1)

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)
The project contains an acceptable
review of the literature on a topic
and/or makes moderate use of
suitable
methodologies not likely learned
in the coursework.
Able to assess areas in need of
personal growth.
Able to set learning goals; creates a
process for planning and achieving
them.
Show interest and curiosity in
acquiring new knowledge and
expanding it.

i. Acquired and applied


knowledge not learned
from previous course
work.

The project makes use of very little


background knowledge or
methodologies not likely to learned
coursework from previous.

ii. Posses personal growth.

Requires considerable assistance to


realize the need for personal growth.

iii. Shows the capability to


develop lifelong learning.

Has difficulty assessing personal


strengths and areas for development.

iv. Demonstrate curiosity


towards new knowledge.

Lack of interest and curiosity in


acquiring new knowledge.

v. Information
management.

Able to search for information using


only one information system (e.g.,
library, bookstore).

Able to locate and organize


information using at least two types
of appropriate technologies or
information systems.

vi. Accessing, analyzing, and


applying knowledge and

Needs assistance to find information

Finds information independently.

(4)

EXCELLENT
(5)
The project contains critical review
of the literature on a topic and/or
makes extensive and effective use of
recognized and suitable
methodologies not likely learned in
the students coursework.
Responsible for planning and
creating own growth experiences.
Ability to identify and accesses own
learning sources and opportunities.
Show strong interest and curiosity in
acquiring new knowledge and
expanding it.
Able to locate relevant information
using more than two appropriate
technologies and information
systems.
Independently organizes information
using appropriate technology and a
recognized system of organization
(e.g., alphabet, subject, topic).
Independently and efficiently finds

PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA
skills.

vii. Able to develop and take


entrepreneurship
opportunity.
viii. Plan (set-up) and setup
own business.

POOR
(1)

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

EXCELLENT
(5)

(4)

when needed.
Needs considerable assistance in
determining how information applies to
and is relevant to a task or subject area.
Needs considerable assistance in this
area (e.g., writing a report, acquiring or
refining a skill, making a presentation).

Independently determines how


information applies to and is relevant
to a task or subject area.
Able to apply knowledge and skills.

Needs assistance develop and take


business opportunity.

Develops and takes the business


opportunity independently.

Able to plan and set-up own business


with considerable assistance.

Able to plan and set-up own business


independently.

information and assists those who


need help.
Critically analyzes how information
applies to and is relevant to a task or
subject area in any discipline.
Able to apply knowledge and skills
and include criteria for evaluation of
the product.
Able to use appropriate strategy to
develop, explore and take the
business opportunity.
Successfully plan and set-up own
business independently.

PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC


PROGRAM OUTCOME 9: Able to communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such
as being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions
PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA
i. Shows skill in
carrying out
experiments.

ii. Shows skill in


developing goals and
procedure (design
& project).

iii. Demonstrates use of


judgment and insight
to
design (formulate) and
present experimental
results.

POOR
(1)

Unable to carry out experiment


without assistance.

Lacking or incorrect theoretical


approach, test plan will produce
experimental data that may or
may not be suitable.

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

(2)

Students capable of carrying


out experiment.

Student able to perform an


analysis in describing the
problem and capable to plan an
experimental procedure.

EXCELLENT
(5)

(4)

Student capable of carrying


out experiments smoothly
with minimum assistance.

Clear explanation and


identification of important
analytical problem features
for investigation of laboratory
experiments.
Well prepared and execute
plan of the experimental.

Data presented in an
understandable manner and does
not show relation to theoretical
trends.

Experimental trends are


discovered and presented using
charts, graphs, or other
presentation format.

Students have the capability


to relate theoretical analysis
and experimental result to
come out a clear and
understandable conclusion.
Student is able to present
experimental result using
appropriate charts graphs and

PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA
i. Shows skill in
carrying out
experiments.

POOR
(1)

Unable to carry out experiment


without assistance.

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

(2)

Students capable of carrying


out experiment.

EXCELLENT
(5)

(4)

Student capable of carrying


out experiments smoothly
with minimum assistance.
others presentation format.

PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC


PROGRAM OUTCOME 10: Able to function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams and in multi-disciplinary settings
PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

POOR
(1)

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

i. Demonstrate
communication and
interaction.

Some evidence of communication and


interaction.
Rarely has confidence to evaluate own
work.
Usually acts without considering
personal ethics when dealing with
people, problems, and situations.

Useful technical communication


among participants.
Has confidence to make sure final
products meet standards.
Consistently uses honesty, integrity,
and an acceptable code of ethics when
dealing with people, problems, and
situations.

ii. Initiative.

Limited contributions of team members.

Contributions by all members of the


team.

(4)

EXCELLENT
(5)
Solid evidence of effective technical
interaction among participants, with
good use of technical communication
tools.
Has confidence to make sure final
products exceed standards.
Shows initiative and effort in
modeling honesty, integrity, and an
acceptable code of ethics when
dealing with people, problems, and
situations.
Uses technical strengths of each
team member to full advantage.
Full participation and a appropriate
technical contributions of each
member.

PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA

POOR
(1)

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

iii. Demonstrate
professional
responsibility and
skills.

Little evidence of leadership,


cooperation, or interaction.
Occasionally sets goals; does not have a
process for achieving goals.
May not fully appreciate the need to set
and reach goals.
Lacks motivation to set goals.

Some planning and interaction is


evident.
Sets realistic, attainable goals; uses a
process for achieving them.
Sets and achieves goals on schedule.
Sets new goals independently.

iv. Use of Diverse (Multidisciplinary)


Technology.

Some integration of multiple


technologies.

Successful use of a variety of


technologies in the project.

(4)

EXCELLENT
(5)
Group work shows organization,
planning, and productive interaction.
Sets challenging goals with a stepby-step plan and time frame for
achieving them.
Sets goals, and achieves them ahead
of schedule; offers to mentor others.
Sets new and challenging goals
independently.
Aggressive investigation and use of
diverse technology by team
members.

PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC


PROGRAM OUTCOME 11: Able to recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the
broadest context of technological change
PO PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA
v. Indicate an
understanding or
appreciation of
contemporary issues.

vi.
Public interest
and societal impact.

POOR
(1)

(2)

ACCEPTABLE
(3)

(4)

EXCELLENT
(5)

The assignment not dealt with an aspect


of contemporary issues and the report
says non about the basic societal issues.

The assignment dealt with a little


aspect of contemporary issues and the
report indicated that the students
understood and appreciated the basic
societal issues.

The assignment dealt clearly with an


aspect of contemporary issues and
the report indicated that the students
understood clearly the detailed scope
and character of the larger societal
issues.

No consideration of public interest and


societal impact and no evaluation in
engineering project/product.

Effective evaluation of public interest


and societal impact and little
evaluation in engineering
project/product.

Effective assessment of public


interest and societal impact and
detailed evaluation in engineering
project/product.

PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC


PROGRAM OUTCOME 12: Able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering and management principles and apply these to ones own work
(including as an entrepreneur), as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments

STUDENT PORTFOLIO

(6) PROGRAMME OUTCOMEBased Assessment Form

PO1 / PO2 / PO3 / PO4 /


PO5 / PO6 / PO7 / PO8 /
PO9 / PO10 / PO11

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA


FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

(Circle where appropriate.


Use separate sheet for each PO.)

PROGRAMME OUTCOME-BASED ASSESSMENT FORM


STUDENT NAME:

PROGRAMME :

STUDENT ID :

SEMESTER :

No:

Course Code

Course

Course Lecturer

EM220 / EM221

PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
(Please refer to respective Programme Outcome
Rubric.)
i

ii

iii

iv

vi

vii

viii

Average
scale for
each
course

Total average scale for all courses (1 to 5):


Scale for PO
Performance
Criteria

POOR
(1)

(2)

ACCEPTA
BLE
(3)

(4)

EXCELL
ENT
(5)

Students Action / Remark: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Academic Advisors Action / Remark: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Signature & Name of Academic Advisor

.
Signature of Student

..
Date

COURSE- PO MAPPING

Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering (Manufacturing) (Hons.) EM241

UNIVERSITI COURSES

Code

HBU111
HBU121
HBU131
CTU551
CTU553
BEL422

BEL499

BAB401
Course

Co-Curriculum I
Co-Curriculum II
Co-Curriculum III
Tamadun Islam dan Tamadun Asia
Hubungan Etnik
Report Writing
Communication and Interpersonal
Skills
Third Language 1
Sem
Credit

1
2
3
2
3
4
1
1
1
2
2
2

3
2

3
2
PO1
PO2

Able to Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering and


management principles and apply these to ones own work (including as an
entrepreneur), as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in
multidisciplinary environments.

Able to Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage
in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological
change.

PO7

Able to Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in


diverse teams and in multi-disciplinary settings.

PO6

Able to Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the


engineering community and with society at large, such as being able to
comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make
effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions

PO5

Able to Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and


responsibilities and norms of engineering practice.

Able to Understand the impact of professional engineering solutions in societal


and environmental contexts and demonstrate knowledge of and need for
sustainable development

PO4

Able to Apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal,


health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities
relevant to professional engineering practice.

PO3

Able to Create, select and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and


modern engineering and IT tools, including prediction and modeling, to
complex engineering activities, with an understanding of the limitations

TABLE 1
Able to Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design
systems, components or processes that meet specified needs with appropriate
consideration for public health and safety, cultural, societal, and environmental
considerations
Able to Conduct investigation into complex problems using research based
knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis
and interpretation of data, and synthesis of information to provide valid
conclusions

Able to Identify, formulate, research literature and analyze complex


engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles
of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering sciences;

Fakulti Kejuruteraan Mekanikal

Able to Apply knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals


and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering
problems;

Submission to The Engineering Accreditation Council for Accreditation of Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering
(Manufacturing) (Honours), Universiti Teknologi MARA

Course to PO Matrix

PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12

Submission to The Engineering Accreditation Council for Accreditation of Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering
(Manufacturing) (Honours), Universiti Teknologi MARA

BAB451
BAB501
ENT600

Third Language 2
Third Language 3
Technopreneurship

4
5
6
Total

2
2
3
20

Sem

Credit

PO1

PO2

1
2
3
4
3

3
3
3
3
3
15

Sem

Credit

1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
4

3
3
2
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3

10

10

10

PO11

PO12

PROGRAM SERVICE COURSES


Code
MAT435
CSC430
MAT455
MAT565
EPE491

Course
Calculus for Engineers
Computer Programming and Applications
Further Calculus for Engineers
Advanced Differential Equations
Electrical Power and Machines
Total

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

PO10

PO1

PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

PO10

PO11

PO12

PROGRAM CORE COURSES


Code
MEC400
MEC412
MEC431
MEM460
MEC441
MEC451
MEC454
MEC481
MEC411
MEC420
MEC424
MEC435

Course
Introduction To Engineering and Problem
Solving
Engineering Statics
Engineering Drawing
Engineering Workshop Practice
Fluid Mechanics I
Thermodynamics
Thermofluids Lab
Materials Science
Mechanics of Materials
Dynamics
Applied Mechanics Lab
Computer-Aided Design

Submission to The Engineering Accreditation Council for Accreditation of Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering
(Manufacturing) (Honours), Universiti Teknologi MARA

MEC442
MEC531
MEC551
MEC554
MEC521
MEM560
MEM564

Fluid Mechanics II
Mechanical Engineering Design I
Thermal Engineering
Thermalfluids Lab
Vibrations
Manufacturing Processes
Manufacturing Processes Lab

4
5
5
5
5
5
5

3
4
3
1
3
3
1

MEC522
MEC532
MEC523
MEM575
MEM603
MEC500
MEC600
MEC601
MEC699
MEC602

Control Engineering
Mechanical Engineering Design II
Applied Electronics and Microprocessor
Industrial Management
Occupational Safety and Health
Numerical Methods with Applications
Engineers in Society
Final Year Project I
Industrial Training
Final Year Project II

6
6
6
6
7
6
7
7
7
8

4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
4
4
81

23

20

Sem

Credit

PO1

7
8
8
8

3
3
3
3
12
128

Total

PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

15

18

PO8

PO9

PO10

PO11

PO12

PROGRAM ELECTIVES COURSES


Code
MEX6YY
MEX6YY
MEX6YY
MEX6YY

Course
Special Topic 1
Special Topic 2
Special Topic 3
Special Topic 4
Total
TOTAL CREDIT

Submission to The Engineering Accreditation Council for Accreditation of Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering
(Manufacturing) (Honours), Universiti Teknologi MARA

PO1

PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

PO10

PO11

PO12

UNIVERESITY ELECTIVE COURSES

10

10

10

PROGRAM SERVICE COURSES

PROGRAM COURSES

23

20

15

18

3
31
63.3
69.7

3
10
20.4
30.3

0
14
28.6
24.2

1
15
30.6
27.3

0
10
20.4
12.1

1
11
22.4
15.2

0
3
6.1
9.1

2
27
55.1
51.5

2
30
61.2
60.6

1
13
26.5
6.1

0
5
10.2
12.1

%
15.6
11.7
63.3
9.4
72.7
100

PROG ELECTIVE COURSES


TOTAL COURSES FOR EACH PO
% COURSES FOR EACH PO (OVERALL)
% COURSES FOR EACH PO (PC +4Es)

/49
/33

3
30
61.2
78.8

TOTAL UEC
TOTAL PSC
TOTAL PC
4 ELECTIVES
TOTAL PC + 4 ELECTIVES
TOTAL UEC+ PSC+ PC + 4 ELECTIVES

Nos
11
5
29
4
33
49

Credit
20
15
81
12
93
128