Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
d. That the overdraft was repayable on demand. If this were not so, it would not
appear amongst the
current liabilities and terms would be stated.
e. That the overdraft was not secured. If it were secured this fact would need to
be stated.
f. That the company has the Authority to borrow from its Memorandum and
Articles.
g. That a bank reconciliation statement can be prepared.
h. That the bank is willing to let the overdraft continue.
If no item bank overdraft appeared in the balance sheet, it would represent an
assertion by the directors
that no overdraft liability existed at the balance sheet date.
REASONABLE ASSURANCE
What is reasonable assurance?
A conclusion that the financial statements are not materially misstated. An
auditor cannot obtain absolute
assurance because of limitations described in Para below.
How reasonable assurance is achieved?
It is achieved by obtaining audit evidence.
Factors affecting reasonable assurance
i) Inherent limitation of an audit, i.e. failure of audit procedures to detect
material
misstatements in financial statements because of:
a) The use of testing (application of procedures on samples).
b) The inherent limitations of accounting and internal control system.
c) Persuasive nature of audit evidence rather than conclusive (Persuasive: one
leading
to an opinion; one which causes to believe; Conclusive: final, convincing).
ii) Exercise of judgment by the auditor in gathering of evidence and drawing of
conclusion.
iii) Existence of other limitations like related parties etc.
REASONABLE ASSURANCE
What is reasonable assurance?
It means a conclusion that the financial statements are not materially misstated.
An auditor cannot obtain
absolute assurance because of limitations described in paragraph below.
Reasonable assurance through audit evidence
Audit evidence:
For internal control
For transactions & accounts balances
For financial statements
Factors affecting reasonable assurance
i) Inherent limitation of an audit, i.e. failure of audit procedures to detect
material
misstatements in financial statements because of:
a) The use of testing (application of procedures on samples).
b) The inherent limitations of accounting and internal control system.
c) Persuasive nature of audit evidence rather than conclusive (Persuasive:
one leading to an opinion; one which causes to believe; Conclusive: final,
convincing).
ii) Exercise of judgment by the auditor in gathering of evidence and drawing of
conclusion.