Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
BY J. L. R. HAYDEN
Member, A. I. E. E.
CHARLES P. STEINMETZ
and
Fellow, A. I. E. E.
Chief Consulting Engineer, General Electric Co., Schenectady, N. Y.
I. General
T HE most important chapters in electrical engineering are those dealing with efficiency, heating,
magnetism and insulation.
In the field of insulation, our knowledge is most
backward.
In regard to efficiency, with efficiencies of electrical
apparatus of 90 up to over 99 per cent, nofurtherradical
progress appears feasible.
In magnetism, the losses in an alternating field have
been reduced so far, that they have ceased to limit, by
their heating effect, the size of apparatus, but are merely
a factor in the efficiency. An increase of the saturation
density would decrease the size of apparatus, but is
excluded by its inherent chemical limitations.
Heating specifications are not made for other classes
of apparatus, such as prime movers, etc., and if an
important subject in electrical engineering, it is almost
entirely because the insulation of the apparatus is
destroyed by the higher temperatures. Thus the problem of the heating of electrical apparatus is essentially
one aspect of the insulation problem.
In our high-voltage apparatus, cables, etc., we operate
the insulation at voltage stresses which rarely exceed
much the disruptive strength of air, though laboratory
tests often show this insulation to have a disruptive
strength of 10 to 20 times that of air.
All phenomena of nature are very complex. Therefore, in calculating a phenomenon or designing an apparatus, we must approximate by neglecting "secondary terms," and take care of these by an allowance,
a margin or a factor of safety. Obviously, the more
completely a phenomenon is known and understood,
the closer it can be calculated, in other words, the less
is the margin or safety factor required in order to allow
for the unknown stresses, etc. The margin or safety
factor, which experience shows as necessary, thus is an
indication of the exactness of our knowledge of a phenomenon. For example when dealing with magnetic
phenomena, with efficiency, with heating, etc., we have
to allow a margin of a few per cent only. In testing
the insulation of apparatus however, the A. I. E. E.
standards specify a test voltage more than twice the
delta voltage, though the normal stress is the Y voltage.
That is, we require a safety factor of over 3.46, a
margin above normal of over 246 per cent.
The insulation problem has become of increasing
importance with the rapid advance of electrical engineering into higher voltages. Not many years ago
44 kv. was the highest transmission voltage for reliability of operation of overhead lines. Now we have
Presented at the Pacific Coast Convention of the A. I. E. E.,
3 .
DeZ Monte, Cal., October 2-5, 192
reached 220 kv. Then 12 kv. was the highest satisfactory cable voltage; now we have reached 22 kv.
and a few cables of 33 kv. and higher, but cables at
33 kv. are still semi-experimental. The comparison
shows that the advance in pushing cable voltages up to
higher values, has been slower than with overhead
lines, and our knowledge of liquid and solid insulation,
such as come into consideration in the cable wall and
the machine insulation, is materially less advanced
than that of air as dielectric. With regard to air, a
good working theory has been established, by considering the dielectric strength of air as analogous to
the mechanical strength of structural materials. The
theory recognizes a definite dielectric strength of air,
or a disruptive breakdown gradient, of 30 kv. per cm.
at normal air density. Puncture occurs when this
dielectric strength is exceeded, just as mechanical
disruption occurs, when anywhere in a mechanical
structure the stresses exceed the elastic limit of the
material. This conception of a definite breakdown
strength then was extended to liquid and solid dielectrics, but with these, it failed to give a satisfactory
explanation of the mechanism of the breakdown, more
particularly of the all-important feature of the time
lag of disruption. And even with air, the theory of a
constant breakdown gradient, as modified by the conception of the energy distance, is satisfactory only
within a certain range.
.
.
II. Air as Dielectric
The present practically universally accepted theory
of a dielectric strength of air at and near atmospheric pressure, as most completely developed by
Mr. F. W. Peek, Jr., is:
Air has a definite and constant "dielectric strength,"
at which it ceases to be an insulator and becomes a
conductor, that is, breaks down electrically.
The dielectric strength of air is proportional to the
air density, and is 30. kv. per cm. at normal air density
of 0 deg. cent. and 76 cm. barometer.
The dielectric breakdown (or puncture) of air does
not occur as soon as the voltage gradient in the dielectric field exceeds the dielectric strength at any
point, but the voltage gradient in the field must exceed
the dielectric strength over a finite distance, the socalled "energy distance."
The energy distance depends on the convergency of
the electric field at the place where the breakdown
occurs, and is the less, the more convergent the field.
The energy distance between parallel cylinders
(wires) of radius R? iS 0.3 ub R; between_spheres of
radius R it is, approximately; 0.54 Vx,6 1R, where
uS= air density (with normal air density as unity).
1029
1030
Transactions A. I. E. E.
October 1923
1031
1032
30 r
l
l
_
.
z20
I
lo
SamplefOil
v V III
~20
20
'*I_
O
1
o-
_
___K
Ai
Transactions A. I. E. E.
IV.
Solid Dielectrics
- -.
hundred
44444
60 70
30 Wo
40 50 Wlv+498
90Ilo10 20ffio
NUMBEROFBREAKDOWN
cent.
Besides
this,
the
disruptive
strength
previous history
under
and even with
~~of
the ally
sample,
etc., conditions,
differences
widemade
just astests
the same
identic
the voltage application, the humidity,
October 1923
1033
asopohmiconductionth losesuenc,
1034
Transactions A. I. E. E.
INSTABILITY
October 1923
1035
specific.
us1
resistivity)woul
aition inhad.itr
fresinstiv
isathr ieast
rofndthe
dapieleceri
carbonization~ ~~ ~
mrrv
1036
Transactions A. I. E. E.
1037
October 1923
insulation as the time lag of breakdown; however, the final condition at disruption. Then the phenomenon would be exponential, that is, start at maximum
this rather extends the meaning of the term.
rate and gradually decrease, thus theoretically take
infinite time. It is customary to consider as the duraELECTRICAL TIME LAG
Air apparently has no time lag, at least, no appreci- tion of such an exponential phenomenon (for instance
able time lag, and the dielectric breakdown of the air the duration of an exponential transient) the time
gap between spheres at a distance greater than the which would be required if the phenomenon conenergy distance and less than the corona distance, tinued to its end at constant initial intensity. Aswith a negligible impedance between spheres and the suming this for the time lag, then the duration T would
source of voltage supply, is as nearly instantaneous as be the time lag at impulse ratio U = e.
can be measured. Time lags (or impulse ratios) with, In the adjustable time gap consisting of an inair gaps therefore are due either to the configuration of stantaneous sphere gap in air, shunted by a capacity C
the gap, or due to the conditions of the supply circuit. and in series with a resistance r, the duration T, as
A sphere gap with a considerable resistance in series defined above, then is:
T = r C,
has an appreciable time lag, the greater, the higher the
resistance, due to the time required to charge the thus has a physical meaning as the rate of condenser
charge.
capacity of the spheres over the resistance.
The capacity of two spheres of ratio R, at distance 1
By shunting an instantaneous sphere gap by a small
from each other, is, if:
160
__
__
14012
g8r
120
;0 l
100
1
9 t 2 R1 +R
1
{~~~~~~~.13
10
0b
20
40
la_f_.0_m eoecns
I_
60
________
20
o_
-4
104
-3
-2
-1
LOG OF TIME
i03 0.01 0.1 1
TIME IN SECONDS
10
FIG. 3
Transactions A. I. E. E.
1038
to the dielectric field intensity g, and therefore in the or in general, in a non-uniform field:
time t acquire the velocity v, in a uniform field:
c
(g-go) dl
(1)
v = gt
(10)
In a non-uniform field, the velocity would be given is the total production of conducting particles in the
by:
distance 1, or the ionic density or conductivity produced
the
g in the distance 1.
(2) byIf wegradient
=
Jw
v
gdt
assume that the conducting particles or car. riers are produced from the gas molecules by collision,
us asm ththro
it v the ionic density or conductivity c must reach a finite
Let us assume that there isLeta critical
vvelocity
at which these carriers produce additional carriers by maximum value, at which "complete ionization'' of
collision with the atoms or molecules of the air or gas. the gas has occurred, and the conductivity thus reached
The time t1 required to reach collision velocity vo its maximum or "short circuit" value co.
Dielectric breakdown thus would be characterized
then is,
=i
vO
g
and the distance, within which this is reached:
t1 i
21vVoO
V02
o2g
b
V(3) by
cO = (g - go) lo = constant = e1
or, in a non-uniform field
(11)
= (g -go) d = constant = el
cO1(2
(4)
(12)
thus:
vO2
(5)
11 g = 2 - const.
or, in a non-uniform field:
v2
const.
(6)
g d l = 22
This is of the dimension voltage. That is, a definite
voltage,
vo2
(7)
eo = 2
electrodes:
and
ro
ro
__
1+,
\2
- 1L d x
____+r2o)=g(r-)
GlIr
rO
)(14)
October 1923
m(
1039
is, the gap length 1 is less than the length lo, within which
)
k
=oo
t1
2m2m
ei = 2 go
where
/O
m
lo
co
g oo
21
90
(1- lo)
g =e/l
and the conduction voltage required to produce maximum conductivity is by (11) given as
(11)
el= (g- go) I
Transactions A. I. E. E.
1040
production
thereby
Eo =f(g-90go) dl
eo + go
conducting particles
326)
10
2e--oo(6
that is:
The voltage c in paragraph 3, which gives the
constant m in Peek's equation (14) etc., is not merely
the excess voltage eo required to produce the conducting
stream, but is the sum of this voltage plus the excess
voltage Yo lo required by the excess gradient in that
part of the field, in which the conductivity has not yet
(
reached full value.
F0 =
~~~~~
30j
50
~200
>150
100
10-'305
I - 20__CENTIMETERS
.
~~~~~(27)
0-3xlO
I o
D.C
A. C. Maximum
,.Peek A. C.
20
20005
1.0
-1
30
NIG 4
40
started at that terminal, which has the greater curvature and thus the higher gradients, the point or small
sphere. If then the polarity of this terminal is that
of the conducting carriers, these move outwards away
from the terminal, towards the opposite terminal, and
thereby short circuit the gap and cause disruption as
soon as the average gradient is sufficiently high to
maintain the conducting stream across the gap. If
15,000-
= g
= go{i+
0.
0. 27 or
10 10,000
>
CENU0.56
5000
~~~~~~~~~~5
$7
28
mn
90{l+
0.54
-
J
The limit lo between equation (23) and (24) is
e = eO + 2 g0 l = 0. 320 6010o
e =m F0 go I = 2.370 3010o
X 10-3
a68X1 68cm.
which is in close agreement with the experimental data
given in the tables and figures, of lo =m 69.
In Figs. 4, 5 and 6 are given numerous test values
taken under various conditions, as indicated, with the
theoretical curves shown by the drawn lines,
Vr
00
0
0.2
0.1
0.3
(CENTIMETERS
0.4
0.5
FIG. 5
however, the larger terminal-plate or large sphereis of the polarity of the carriers, a higher voltage across
iS exbefore
the critical carriers
gradientstarted
gapand
IS required
~~~~~~the
the swarm
of conducting
ceeded
at this larger terminal and disruptive discharge occurs.
At the smaller terminal, in this case, the formation of
conducting carriers has started already at lower voltage, but these carriers do not move away from the
terminal and across the gap, and thus do not cause
October 1923
1041
unlimited current, and when it begins, thus short-circuits the gap and drops the voltage. Electronic conduction however is limited in current, and when it
occurs, the voltages can be maintained and still further
raised. At such high vacuua, where the voltage of
ionic conduction has risen beyond that of electronic
conduction, and the conduction become electronic, the
voltage can be raised beyond the value of ionic conduction through the traces of residual gases, and then
ionic conduction again begins and "short-circuits" the
electron tube, thus limiting electronic conduction.
Therefore a practically perfect vacuum is needed for
pure electronic conduction in the modern high-power
electron tube.
the other side, with pressures higher than atmosloo
pheric, the disruptive voltage increases with increasing
pressure, and approximately proportional thereto, as
shown by experiment. It may be expected then, that
at some high pressures the voltage of ionic conduction
increases beyond that of electronic conduction, and the
latter limits the increase of disruptive strength of gases
C0
Whileindicate
little
this field
10
at high pressures.
2.5
dielectric
thathasthebeen
experiments
investigated,
CENTIMETERS 7.55
FIG. 6
gradients of air and gases with increasing pressures
reach a limiting value somewhere at 1000 kv. per cm.
gradient of air, the disruptive voltage of such an
Discussion
unsymmetrical gap should be about twice as high with
the voltage of the carriers on the large electrode, than
R. W. Sorensen: My first point is in connection with7the
with the voltage of the carriers in the opposite direction. statement that we use our insulations under stresses which rarely
Fig. 1 shows this, and also shows that the disruptive exceed the breakdown voltage of air, though tests show a strength
voltage is lower with the small terminal (the needle of 10 to 20 times that of air for many of the insulations used.
This plea for a more strenuous use of insulating materials is
point in this case) positive.
It follows from this, that the conducting particles or
carriers, which carry the disruptive discharge in air at
1i
- -I
0 I
atmospheric pressure, are positively charged, that is,
A
1
they may be the positive ions, but cannot be the nega0 80
tive electrons.
Y
<
60
- 7. Dielectric conduction thus may be either ionic,
/|
ttSOn
a
z
40
20 -
- 1 1 14
8
10
12
2
4
6
c0
GAP LENGTH IN CENTIMETERS
FIG. 1-ARCING POTENTIAL VS. GAP LENGTH
Between Needle and Sphere, 12.5 cm. dia.
Curve I-Direct Current, Sphere Negative
Positive
II- ts
It
electronic conduction. The phenomenon then changes that a given potential will cause spark over between a point and
its character, ionic conduction ceases and electronic a sphere for much greater spacing when the sphere is negaUtive,
conduction begins. At high vacuua, the conduction than will be the case writh the needle points negative and the
thu
is
elcroi.
tnus ISelectronlc.
sphere positive. The results shown in Fig. 3 have been dupliby Messrs. Otis and Mendenhall, two students abt Calia~~~~~ated
fornia, Institute of Technology a.s shown by the curves in Fig. 1
1042
voltage alternating current was rectified by means of a twosegment commutator driven by a two-pole synchronous motor.
The a-c. curve is very much like that obtained by Hayden
and Steinmetz, but the d-c. curves differ in shape because of the
pulsating current obtained with the commutator, whereas
Hayden and Steinmetz had very steady current delivered by a
four kenetron rectifier. An explanation of the dip in these
curves would be very interesting.
In John S. Townsend's "Ionization of Gases by Collision" is
found this statement "When the point is negative, the strong
field is near the negative electrode, so that the potential required to produce a discharge is less than when the point is
positive." Also in "Conduction of Electricity through Gases,"
1906 edition, by J. J. Thompson on page 498 we find this statement ".this minimum potential depends upon the
sharpness of the point, the pressure and nature of the gas, and
the sign of the electrification of the point, being less if the point
is negatively than if it is positively electrified." Hence we have
from these authorities statements which, at first reading, appear
quite contrary to those given in this paper.
There is, however, some confusion as to the definition of the
term "spark discharge," in the texts referred to the term does
not seem to apply to an arc current and the voltage required
to cause it, but means the point at which a leak discharge only
and not a complete. are over occurs between -the electrodes.
In fact in one treatise on the subject of ionization this definition
appears: "Sparking potential may be defined as the potential
which is required to maintain a very small current in the gas."
Dr. Millikan has explained the Hayden-Steinmetz results on
the basis of the increased difficulty experienced in extending the
ionization envelope with negative points, as compared to that
phenomena for positive points, hence the required higher potentials for a breakdown over a given distance.
In discussing the mechanism of "thermal breakdown of
dielectrics" the paper follows the work of Mr. Wagner as published in the JOURNAIT for December 1922, but Wagner does not
deduce the same law. Also some tests we have made in our
laboratory do not conform the deduction that puncture voltage
is proportional to the square root of the thickness of dielectric.
To emphasize "time lag" is indeed worth while as our experience shows it an important factor in making an analysis of voltage stresses on insulations, and indicates that an intensive study
should be made of the laws which govern it. It may be of
interest to note here that in testing thousands of porcelain
insulators I have found that very few which stand a potential
test at minimum arc over voltage for fifteen seconds, fail when
the potential is applied for a longer time. In testing apparatus
insulated with organic insulating materials very often potentials
apparently harmless when applied for short periods will cause
breakdown when applied for longer periods of time.
At the bottom of the last page: "It follows from this, that
the conducting particles or carriers, which carry the disruptive
discharge in air at atmospheric pressure, are positively charged,
that is, they may be the positive ions, but cannot be the negative
electrons."
Transactions A. I. E. E.
bandnoediatiso futureocaon.
There is, however, one feature which begins to get clear,
namely, that our conception of insulation and of breakdown of
insulation again begins to change and to be subjected to multiplication. To members in the early days, insulation was merely
a boundairy bar. We knew, by experience, that a tenth of an
inch of insulation of a conductor would protect it against 2300
volts. Then, when it came to higher voltages we realized that
there is something occurring within the boundary bar, of importance, and it is not merely the material, but there is a dielectric field with potential radius and other things within the
boundary bars which require consideration and study, and which
we are studying.
Now, it seems that our views are just beginning again to get
a multiplication with respect to at least the failure of insulation
and the mechanism of breakdowns. It seems to be clear that
the mechanism of breakdowns, under the failure of insulation
on high voltage is a phenomena of instability. In other words,
it is not that insulation fails, that dielectric breaks down, when
electric stresses are beyond limits and value, but it is said that
under conditions very much lower than those gradients in
lightning conditions of instability occur which gradually brings
about the multiplication and changes leading ultimately to a
breakdown of insulation. It is, therefore, a condition of instability of constants of material which instability brings about,
largely upon lesser changes, which leads either to destruction
or breakdown. Therefore, the mere reduction or stress on the
insulation is not a factor which saves breakdowns, but that the
new problem of insulation seems to assume the shape of arranging
of designs in the dielectric field of insulation, so as to get the
condition of stability and not instability. That is the future
which seems to impress itself upon us. The more we study the
problems of insulation we find that it is not existing stresses that
cause this, but largely it is the result of stability, or instability.
Now, that is not only true in solids, but probably in the air.
In this respect we could point out the same idea that the discharge makes its own gradient. Now, you have the same conception there, that it is the discharge which is taking place in the
dielectric field about conditions which are unstable. We all
know that if we had 2,000,000 volts spread over, I don't know
how many thousand inches, there could be a gradient that
would be so low there would be no puncture and for that discharge under such conditions. By the discharge making its own
gradient there would be produced a dielectric condition of
instability which would finally lead to self-destruction.