Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
Water turbines are widely used throughout the world to generate power. In the type of
water turbine referred to as a Pelton wheel, one or more water jets are directed tangentially on
to vanes or buckets that are fastened to the rim of the turbine disc. The impact of the water on
the vanes generates a torque on the wheel, causing it to rotate and to develop power. Although
the concept is essentially simple, such turbines can generate considerable output at high
efficiency. Powers in excess of 100 MW, and hydraulic efficiencies greater than 95%, are not
uncommon. It may be noted that the Pelton wheel is best suited to conditions where the
available head of water is great, and the flow rate is comparatively small. For example, with a
head of 100 m and a flow rate of 1 m3 /s, a Pelton wheel running at some 250 rev/min could
be used to develop about 900 kW. The same water power would be available if the head were
only 10 m and the flow were 10m3 /s, but a different type of turbine would then be needed.
To predict the output of a Pelton wheel, and to determine its optimum rotational
speed, we need to understand how the deflection of the jet generates a force on the buckets,
and how the force is related to the rate of momentum flow in the jet. In this experiment, we
measure the force generated by a jet of water striking a flat plate or a hemispherical cup, and
compare the results with the computed momentum flow rate in the jet.
2.0
OBJECTIVES
1.
2.
3.
3.0
THEORY
The momentum equation based on Newtons 2nd law of motion states that the algebraic sum
of external forces applied to control volume of fluid in any direction equal to the rate of
change of momentum in that direction.
The external forces include the component of the weight of the fluid and of the forces exerted
externally upon the boundary surface of control volume.
If a vertical water jet moving with velocity V made to strike a target (Vane) which is free, to
move in vertical direction, force will be exerted on the target by the impact of jet.
Applying momentum equation in z- direction, force exerted by the jet on the vane, Fz is given
by
F = Q (Vz out - Vz in)
For flat plate, Vz out = 0
Fz = Q (0-v)
FZ = Qv
For hemispherical curved plate, Vz out= -v, Vz in= v
Fz = Q [v+ (-v)]
FZ = 2 Qv
Where Q= Discharge from the nozzle (Calculated by volumetric method)
V= Velocity of jet = (Q/A)
Experimental setup:
The set up primarily consists of a nozzle through which jet emerges vertically in such a way
that it may be conveniently observed through the transparent cylinder. It strikes the target
plate or disc positioned above it. An arrangement is made for the movement of the plate
under the action of the jet and also because of the weight placed on the loading pan. A scale is
provided to carry the plate to its original position i.e. as before the jet strikes the plate. A
collecting tank is utilised to find the actual discharge and velocity through nozzle.
4.0
EQUIPMENT
1) Hydraulic bench
2) Jet impact apparatus
3) Stopwatch
4) Vernier calliper
Given:
Diameter of nozzle
= 10 mm
Flat plate = gA
3
120 curved plate = 2gA
2
Hemispherical cup = gA
apparatus
5.0
PROCEDURE
1. First of all, the upper
transparent
plate
and
removable
cylinder.
5. Nominal weight was place on the lever first (it is suggested that the initial weight and
weight gain = 20g). Water will then be inserted through the bench supply valve.
6. The force on the ram which would replace lever, then returned to the balanced
position by the sliding weight along the lever jockey. There, at the base bench
hydraulic opening closed.
6.0
Volume of water
V (l)
Time t (s)
Flow rate Q
(l/s)
Q2
20
42.30
0.12
0.014
40
23.70
0.21
0.044
60
20.10
0.25
0.063
80
16.60
0.30
0.090
Volume of water
V (l)
Time t (s)
Flow rate Q
(l/s)
Q2
20
50.18
0.10
0.010
40
30.42
0.16
0.026
60
23.48
0.21
0.044
80
19.85
0.25
0.062
Volume of water
V (l)
Time t (s)
Flow rate Q
(l/s)
Q2
20
54.90
0.091
0.008
c) Hemispherical cup
40
33.30
0.150
0.023
60
27.72
0.180
0.032
80
21.66
0.231
0.053
2. Plot the graph of mass of jockey weight m versus Q2 for flat plate, 120o inclined plate and
hemispherical cup and find the slope of the graphs.
7.0
DISCUSSIONS
1) Besides that, weight of load also effects to the result because if the weight of load is
high, the distance between of nozzle and conical plate will be near and the rate
of water flow hence will be high. Readjustments were not properly made for the
datum each time weight is added to the device, hence increasing errors to the data.
2) Based on the results, our measured slope value of all plates are larger than the
theoretical slope value. These may be affected by the gradient of the graph. As it is
apparent from the result of this experiment, the velocity and the reaction forces are
proportional in their amounts. The theoretical calculated slope was smaller compared
to the experimental measured slope for all targets.
3) The theoretical calculated slope shows that the 120 degree, hemispherical, target has
the lowest flow rate. However, the experimental measured slope shows that the 90
degree target has the lowest flow rate. The results display inconsistencies which
indicate errors incurred during the procedure. It is also apparent that the errors were
the largest for the 90 degree target.
4) The experimental values were different from the theoretical values since theoretical
values were applied from the formula given. So we conclude that there were errors in
our experiment.
Errors found and may be affected on the results in the experiment due to many
reasons listed below:
CONCLUSION
9.0
REFERENCES
1) Internet
Impact of a jet | Rania Sabbah - Academia.edu
http://www.academia.edu/7467087/Impact_of_a_jet
2) Report
https://www.scribd.com/doc/167244278/Mubarak-Impact-of-Jet-lab-report