Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.lindfield
www.lindfieldtimes.co.uk
times.co.uk Circulation 6,000
* PRH Campaign Latest * The Poor Law & Lindfield * Bowls Club at 100 *
* Lindfield Times Photographic Competition With Great Prizes*
* Record Attendance at Horticultural Society Show *
* Lindfield Preservation Society Newsletter Inside*
Editors Comments
Comments
Cover image:
‘Historic Lindfield’
© Lindfield Times 2007 There has been so much going on locally lately
Copydate for October issue of this August edition of the Lindfield Times is
Lindfield Times: 10th September packed with lots of interesting articles, hot off
2007 the press.
We have included full coverage of the latest
information about the destiny of the PRH, the
Editor Jeremy Crooks
Lindfield Preservation Society have included
Design Editor Kevin Elliott
their latest newsletter covering six pages and
Tel: 01444 487454 there are many articles from the press office of
Email: editor@lindfieldtimes.co.uk the Mid Sussex District Council.
www.lindfieldtimes.co.uk
See the back page for our photographic compe-
Photography by: Picsnapper tition entry form, prizes include a camera and a
www.picsnapper.co.uk free photo shoot in our new studio based in
Printed by: Swan Press Brighton and a free family portrait. Only Top
Prizes come from The Lindfield Times.
To Advertise Call Jay
Tel: 01444 487454
CANON
If you submit any photographs for print, please ensure
Issue 26 Page 3
B’Old over 100
LINDFIELD BOWLING CLUB
Over a hundred years of bowling on
the Common
Lindfield Bowling Club has been in existence since 1903. Today it has over 130 members.
If anyone can recognise any of the bowlers, we would be extremely interested to know. Also if any-
one has a different view on the translation, then please advise.
Please contact Roger Green, Lindfield Bowling Club, 01444 484366 or Richard Bryant, Lindfield
History Project Group, 01444 482136
The fundraising appeal is backed by the four local MPs who are leading the campaign, Nicholas
Soames, Nick Herbert, Norman Baker and Charles Hendry.
Campaign organisers say that the fund will be used to prepare a detailed case to respond to the
Primary Care Trust, using the help of a professional health economist, which will cost tens of thou-
sands of pounds. Campaign material will also be distributed to every local household, including
posters and a response form, which can be sent to the PCT.The MPs, who have all backed the
fund personally, are calling on the whole community to support their hospital by displaying posters
and contributing to the appeal. Every resident is asked to give at least £1 towards the fund, and
local businesses are being asked to contribute £1 for every employee.
The campaign is planning a programme of fund raising events, and local community organisations
will be encouraged to hold their own fund raising activities, such as sponsored swims and coffee
mornings. Organisers will also be writing to larger local firms, requesting sponsorship for campaign
publicity.
Residents who are able to contribute to the fighting fund can do so by:
Sending their donation (cheques made payable to “Support the PRH campaign”) to Support the
Princess Royal Hospital, 5 Hazelgrove Road, Haywards Heath, RH16 3PH
Making an over the counter deposit, or internet transfer to Support the PRH Campaign, Lloyds
TSB, Haywards Heath. Sort code 30-18-30 Account number 02094728
Speaking today, Norman Baker, MP for Lewes said: "It's now or never - we have only 14 weeks left
to put our case to the PCT, and we need everyone's support. If every household and business
puts in at least pound, we will really be able to take the fight to the Trust"
Nicholas Soames, MP for Mid Sussex said: "We must make the strongest possible case to the
Primary Care Trust and show that retention of Maternity and A&E services is a viable option.
There's no doubt that the Trust is on the back foot, but we need the resources to step up cam-
paigning and ensure that the PRH stays in the fight”
Nick Herbert, MP for Arundel & South Downs added: "Frankly, this is a call to arms. We must step
up the pressure and that means funds. I'd like to see as many posters and car stickers for the
PRH as I see for the other hospitals in West Sussex. Every pound will add strength to the case for
our local hospital, so please help"
The campaign has pledged that the fighting fund will be publicly audited, and any funds remaining
at the end of the campaign will be divided equally between the Sussex Air Ambulance and St.
Peters & St. James Hospice.
Editors Note......”Its your hospital, fight now or forever hold your peace”
Issue 26 Page 7
The most celebrated festival in September is the harvest
Blackberry Muffins
Heat the oven to 190°C. Sit
paper cases in 12 large muffin
tins.
Beat together 100g soft butter,
100g caster sugar, 2 beaten
eggs and 2tbs milk.
Sift over 150g plain flour, 1 tsp
baking powder and 1tsp cinna-
mon. Mix just until combined.
Gently stir in 100g blackberries.
Spoon into the paper cases and top each with a teaspoon of Demerara sugar. Bake for about 18
min until risen and golden brown.
Caroline Young
If you like this recipe and make some tasty muffins perhaps the editorial staff at the Lindfield
Times should just check them for flavour !
The Lindfield History Project Group will be attempting to answer these questions and many others
at its 'Our Lindfield' exhibition to be held on 6th -7th October at King Edward Hall.
The aim is to uncover the past and little known facts about each road or area in today's village, in
effect rolling back time to reveal Lindfield before the houses. The exhibition will show how Lindfield
progressed from little more than one road surrounded by farms to our Lindfield that we know today.
Over a thousand years of history will be uncovered to provide a sense of place. Discover Lindfield
beyond the High Street, from the gas works to the proposed lunatic asylum at Kenwards.
To help illustrate the recent past, do you have any photographs, perhaps of your house being built,
original sale particulars or any other items relating to your house, road or Lindfield in general? If
so we would welcome hearing from you.
Please make a note of the Exhibition dates - Saturday 6th and Sunday 7th October, 11.00am to
4.00pm. Contact: Richard Bryant, Lindfield History Project Group,
Tel 482136 or email Rjbryant06@aol.com
So can you work out where you live now? 737 554 ?
According to statistics just produced by Mid Sussex Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership for
the first quarter of 2007, Mid Sussex is one of the safest places to live in Great Britain.
As a Home Office initiative, launched in 1998, Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships were
introduced in every local authority area to reduce crime and anti-social behaviour. Mid Sussex
District Council is one of the partners, together with the police, proba-
tion service, health authorities, the voluntary sector, local residents and
businesses in the Mid Sussex CDRP.
The measure of success for all CDRPs is the British Crime Survey
Comparator crime indicator, which includes key crimes like burglary,
criminal damage and car crime. To compare performance of like with
like, all CDRPs are grouped with others of similar size and demogra-
phy.
June statistics indicate that Mid Sussex is the best performer in its
group with 7.2 crimes per 1000 residents. In June there were 16 bur-
glaries compared with 23 in June last year, and 24 in April last year. Criminal damage or vandal-
ism accounts for about a quarter of all crime in Mid Sussex. The first quarter of 2007 has seen an
18 per cent decrease - 88 fewer incidents - on the previous quarter. .
There has also been a drop in violent crime with 107 offences for June 2007 compared with 166
for June 2006. Mid Sussex is a low crime area and to put this into context, in June this year
Nottingham recorded 1,030 violent crimes compared with 1,121 offences in June 2006.
To tackle anti-social behaviour more effectively, the CDRP has introduced a dedicated anti-social
behaviour caseworker to the community safety team. It has also set up an on-line anti-social
behaviour reporting facility on the MSDC website*. Following its introduction, 40 anti-social behav-
iour reports were received for June 2007, compared with 11 for April and three for May 2007.
Although some of the information received was about unreported past events, the information is
enabling the team to build up a more accurate picture of anti social behaviour in the District.
Over the next few months, the Community Safety team will also be staging a number of public
briefing events, which will enable residents to discuss the problems they have encountered in their
areas.
The team is also involved in a number of initiatives aimed at sup-
porting young people and their parents, including the develop-
ment of a joint working scheme with Streetmate - an outreach
youth work project.
Help for the poor went together with measures to defend public
order against the threat of the wandering unemployed. This led
to the notion that everyone belonged to the parish in which he or
she was born, or was associated with through work or marriage.
People who couldn't support themselves were entitled to relief
from their parish. The question of where needy individuals were
legally deemed to be settled was therefore of financial importance
to the parish, and the process for determining disputed cases has
left us with records such as this:
"1752 October 12. Mary Hampton and child Sarah 10y, were
apprehended in St James, Westminster, as rogues and
vagabonds, there wandering in a loose, idle and disorderly man-
ner. On examination, M.H. said that she is 33 years old, the
widow of Robert HAMPTON, a linen draper, who served his apprenticeship with Timothy BROWN
at Lindfield and never gained any other settlement. That she has one child now living by her hus-
band, Sarah 10y. [Mark of M. H.] M H to be removed to Lindfield via St Mary, Lambeth. [Received
into the workhouse, Lindfield, 16 October]."
"1735 Mar. 18. Mary VINALL, singlewoman, has declared that John
COMBER of Lindfield, miller, is the father of the male bastard child born to
her in Lindfield. J.C. to pay 1s 6d a week maintenance and £1 5s 0d already
expended since the birth; the mother to pay sixpence a week."
"1738 May 21. John PINION of Fletching, who married Mary VINALL, has at
a vestry in our Parish Church of Lindfield, agreed with the parish officers and
parishioners there present, to take home to his house, to keep and maintain
… a male child born to his wife (begotten by John COMBER of Lindfield), at
his own proper cost and charge and to free the parish of Lindfield from all
charges thereof, except the 18d a week which he is to receive from the offi-
cers of Lindfield, as is paid by J.C. from 2nd May last, so long as the child is
liable or may become chargeable."
John Usher
Issue 26 Page 21
Don't Cut the Grass
September can be the most stunning of months in the garden. The longer nights prompt the
autumn plants to start flowering and what a show they put on. Borders can be awash with colour
and structure, whether your preference is for
the autumnal colours or soft pinks and purples.
This is the first time that we have used the Lindfield Times to circulate our newsletters, not only to
our own members, but to all local residents. We are grateful to them for giving us this opportunity
at a time when the Village is being threatened by the prospect of unacceptable large scale housing
developments around its borders.
Elsewhere in this newsletter, you will see an Appeal from us, in association with the newly
reformed Lindfield Action Group, to join the Society and give a donation to our fighting fund, so
that we can be in a position to defend ourselves against this threat. Please may I urge you all to
support us, and make a note to come to our open meeting at the King Edward Hall on 19th
September at 8pm.
As you can imagine, the Society has had another busy year. The number of planning applications
in both Lindfield Urban and Rural Parishes continues to increase as you will see from John
Jesson's report.
Members of the Management Committee continue to support the work of the Village Plan Advisory
Group, led by Martin Higgins, who are now busily preparing the important Village Plan Design
Statement, which you will read about elsewhere in this issue of the Lindfield Times. You will see
they are holding an exhibition on Saturday 24th November at the King Edward Hall from 10.00am
to 4.00pm, at which you will be able to view the draft statement. Please make a special note in
your diary.
The Lime Tree saga continues, as you will see from David Macmillan's report. The attitude of the
Tree Officer at MSDC is, in my opinion, reprehensible. There is absolutely no need to remove all
the existing trees and replace them by a smaller number of them. What is needed is nothing less
than a proper agreed annual schedule of restoration work, including pollarding, where considered
necessary. I hope that common sense will still eventually prevail..
The Society exists to help conserve the quality of life of the citizens of Lindfield, as well as the his-
toric character of the Village. We greatly value the support of our Members, and warmly welcome
new ones, particularly families, and all those who share an interest
in our aims and objectives. When we see our local amenities under threat, like the utterly disgrace-
ful proposal to downgrade the Princess Royal Hospital, at the same time as being threatened with
increased housing allocations, I believe there has never been a more important time, since it's for-
mation in 1969, for the Society to stand up against those forces who seek to destroy our heritage.
Issue 26 Page 23
Lindfield Preservation Society - Planning News
The flow of planning applications for Lindfield is relentless. Since the beginning of this year there
have been 96 planning applications in Lindfield Parish and another 44 in Lindfield Rural Parish to
inspect.
Of course, some of you may be aware that "inspect" now means via a computer screen using a
new system that Mid-Sussex District Council launched in April and which included the closure of
the public reception point at Oaklands, where we could handle the documents and drawings and
put a scale over them to assess them properly. We have had to make a number of criticisms of
the system, all intended to help get it working as well as could be expected. A major problem ini-
tially was the absence of any method on screen to find out the size of proposals, but at our sug-
gestion the date stamp now includes a 5cm length from which it is possible to set the screen
image to scale. It may well be that the public reception at Oaklands will re-open. Of course you
can still see Planning Application for Lindfield Parish at the Parish Office in Denmans Lane during
opening hours, but here as well the system is due to move to a computer terminal format very
soon.
Although the quantity is always between 200 and 250 in the two Parishes each year, none has
related to a major development. Effort has been put into representations to support MSDC in their
efforts to prevent major development at the sites north of Newton Road and between Scamps Hill
and Gravelye Lane. It is by no means certain that both can be stopped. The Planning Inspector is
considering the matter.
The Society continues to speak at Parish Council Meetings and Mid-Sussex District Council
Meetings where we see it necessary to make comment on Planning Applications. Written repre-
sentations are also sent.
Getting the High Street Limes restored to pollards is not moving at all well, although we must bear
in mind that tree work has to fit with the seasons. In spite of delays caused by MSDC officers, we
hope it will still happen eventually!
John Jesson
Residents will be well aware that a limited pruning of lateral branches, described as 'height reduc-
tion' took place in November 2006 and that village pressure on the contractors managed to get the
large Lime tree outside the Manor House included. Originally the contractors advised interested
parties that this tree was to be left untouched as it was scheduled for felling!
Part of the Thurman Consultancy Report to the Parish Council stated that "…all the trees could be
described as mature …….. quite a variation in ages from perhaps 100 to 40/50 years
old……external visible signs suggest that all are in healthy condition with no major defects".
Evidence of this health can be clearly seen in the amount of new basal growth on all the trees and
especially on the specimen outside of The Manor House.
An entirely separate issue concerns the 23 trees on Black Hill, of which 11 sited between the
Upper Common and the road show signs of past pollarding.
Despite numerous meetings, correspondence and promises the continued care of our High Street
lime trees remains stalled in an incredible tangle of inter-council bickering and obstruction with
Lindfield caught in the middle. West Sussex County Council wants to get on with job but needs
Mid Sussex District Council's permission as the planning authority. On October 26th.2006 Mid
Sussex District Council's Planning Committee, composed of elected councillors, recommended
that the lime trees should be pollarded. However, the Tree Officer at Mid Sussex District Council
has his own agenda and, despite the elected councillors firm recommendation, refused to autho-
rise the work claiming that the Village Plan response of 78% in favour of pollarding was insufficient
evidence of public support for pollarding.
Nobody expects trees to last for ever and that felling and replanting are routine forestry manage-
ment, but it takes little imagination to visualize our High Street without trees, with road and path-
ways excavated to clear roots before replanting! Furthermore this is proposed by a District
Council who delayed any attention to our trees on the basis that it would detract from the appear-
ance of the Conservation Area!
One month after this announcement there is still no further clarification of the timescale intended,
neither are there any details on which trees would not be replaced, nor any indication of what will
happen to our existing trees this winter. Will they be further pruned to reduce their height or will
they be properly pollarded to achieve the historic appearance of our High Street Limes? Only
WSCC and MSDC know and they are not telling Lindfield, but hopefully our Parish Council
will inject a degree of urgency and courtesy into the County and District Councils in order
that the villagers of Lindfield will know what is planned and when…..!!!
David Macmillan
Issue 26 Page 25
Appeal by
The Lindfield Preservation Society
In Association with Lindfield Action Group
Under the South East Regional Authority (SERA) proposals for the Small Scale Housing
Allocations (SSHA) over the next 20 years up to 2026, Mid Sussex faces the unacceptable
prospect of 15,000 new homes being built, nearly 4,000 of which would be in Lindfield. The
map below shows the proposed developments at (i) Newton Road and (j) and (k) Scamps Hill,
alone totalling nearly 3,000 homes.
If this is allowed to happen it would have the effect of doubling the size of the village and turning
us into a town, thereby destroying its historic character.
On the one hand, the Government is systematically reducing the financial resources available to
Local Authorities in the South East, whilst on the other, demanding more and more housing provi-
sion, which require greatly increased resources being available to build the necessary infrastruc-
ture, which has little realistic chance of being achieved.
Moreover, whilst no-one can deny that there is a shortage of available low cost housing, it is
patently obvious that such large scale developments simply cannot be absorbed within the existing
infrastructure, which is already over stretched, and is incapable of being adequately upgraded.
The Lindfield Action Group (LAG) has therefore been revived under the umbrella of the Lindfield
Preservation Society (LPS) to meet this threat. LAG will, with your support, do everything in its
power to prevent these threats being turned into reality. Steps are already being taken to secure
the services of legal and professional advisers in order to mount our campaign.
cont./...........
We have no doubt that we will have the support of our local Parish Councils and our MP. In the
Autumn and during next year there will be a series of meetings and exhibitions, the first one of
which will be a Public Meeting, open to all local residents, to be held on 19th September, at the
King Edward Hall, at 8pm. Full details of the speakers will be posted on our notice board in the
Village. Please make a special note of this date in your diary, and make every effort to come.
Those of you who answered our recent questionnaire will be interested to know that 91% of over
600 replies agreed with the statement, which said "Lindfield cannot accommodate any more
greenfield developments without losing its essential character as a village".
In our view, nothing short of a fundamental reappraisal of the whole strategy towards the SERA
policy is essential and securing a substantial reduction in the current targets that have been set.
The recent inclement weather, which resulted in flooding in some parts of the Village, thankfully
without serious damage, should serve as a warning that new housing developments are totally
inappropriate, in particular the area surrounding Newton Road.
Please join the LPS now and send your subscriptions and donations to our Fighting Fund using
the attached form for this purpose.
Thank you in anticipation of your support. Together we must succeed for the sake of, not only our-
selves, but future generations, and preserving their quality of life.
Michael Anstey
Chairman
Issue 26 Page 27
Our Programme of Meetings for 2007
All these meetings will be held in the King Edward Hall starting at either 8pm for the evening meet-
ing or 2:30pm for the afternoon meetings. Admission including refreshments is £1.
Everyone is welcome.
Please pass on this newsletter and encourage other villagers to become members by using this
slip:
Name(s) _____________________________________________________________
Address _____________________________________________________________
Annual membership due 1st January (Individual £5, Household £10) ______________
Donation ______________
Gift Aid: I confirm that I pay Income Tax and/or Capital Gains Tax at least equivalent to the tax
which you reclaim on my payment (currently 28p for every £1 you give).
Cheques should be made payable to 'Lindfield Preservation Society' and sent with this slip (or a
copy) to:
Mr Andrew Fox, 4 Dukes Road, Lindfield, Haywards Heath, West Sussex RH16 2JH.
Please enclose a S.A.E.
Name.............................................................
Address...................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
............................................................Post Code....................................
Picture Title..............................................................................................
at..............................................................................................................
send your images by email to competition@lindfieldtimes.org.uk
but remember we will need this entry form sent in by post
I think this photograph should win because
.....................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................
Signed..................................................Date...............................
Parent/Guardian
Telephone number.........................................................
Issue 26 Page 31