Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1.0 Introduction
Flexible, composite and rigid pavements are the most common types of pavement used for
highways in India and in the rest of the world. There may be another type of pavements
which can be obtained by grouting of open graded bitumen treated aggregates with cement
(or polymer based slurry), and are known as grouted bituminous macadam. The present
guideline deals with cement grouted bituminous macadam (CGBM).
In such layer, first, the single sized (preferably cubic) aggregates mixed with bituminous
binder is used to prepare the aggregate skeleton. This aggregate skeleton should have voids
(VMA) 25% or more, which is quite high compared to the traditional mixes. Sometimes
fibres are added to prevent draindown of binder. Then, sufficiently flowable cement grout is
introduced to fill up the voids by gravity. This cement grout is prepared by mixing suitable
proportions of cement, fine sand and water. Additives like micro silica, flyash,
superplasticizer may be added so that the grout flows into the voids and attains the required
strength. Flowability of the grout plays an important role in developing the strength of the
CGBM. A typical CGBM mix contains 10 mm single size (75% of the aggregates are
between 10 mm passing and 6.3mm retained) aggregates, typical bitumen content is about
3% by weight of the aggregates.
CGBM is generally used as surfacing (Oleveira et. al. 2008), but it also has potential to be
used as base course (Oleveira et. al. 2007). It seemed to have been developed in France
during 1960s and was known as resin modified pavement (Wu 2011, Gawedzinki 2008,
Anderton 2000). In USA it is first applied during 1987 (Anderton 2000). Various countries
where CGBM has been used includes France, USA, Germany, Japan, Spain, Portugal,
Sweden, Norway, Finland, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Austria and so on (Anderton 2000).
CGBM has been reportedly used in bus stations, parking areas, warehouses etc (Al-Qadi et al.
1994), roads and aprons (Wu 2011). Some of the advantages of CGBM are (Anderton 2000,
Oleveira et. al. 2006, 2007, 2009, Wu 2011):
1
These advantages enable CGBM mix to take care of the some of the individual limitations
associated with cement concrete and bituminous mix.
laboratory studies on stiffness (Anderton 2000, Oliveira et al. 2006, 2009), tensile and
compressive strength (Anderton 2000), Marshall stability (CRRI 2002), thermal expansion
coefficient (Anderson 2000),
(Oliveira et al. 2006, 2008 and 2009) properties of CGBM and found to show satisfactory
performance. The consistency and quantity of binder, size and gradation of the aggregates,
loading frequency, grout strength and shrinkage potential, temperature etc are observed to
affect these properties (Oliveira et al. 2006, 2008 and 2009).
This guidelines lay down recommendation for CGBM that may be used as a wearing course
for low volume roads. For high volume roads, bitumen coated binder and base layers also
can be grouted with cement slurry to obtain a durable pavement. Properties of grout, method
of construction of cement grouted bituminous layer as well as pavement design principles are
also included in the guidelines. Due to lack of extensive performance data of pavements with
such materials, pavement performance data should be periodically recorded in order to
revalidate or revise the guidelines.
ii
2.0 Materials
The CGBM mix consists of aggregates, bituminous binder and cement grout. The
recommended specifications for these materials are mentioned in the following:
2.1 Aggregates
The aggregates shall be open-graded asphalt and they shall consist of clean, sound, tough
angular and durable particles obtained from crushing of rocks. The physical properties of the
aggregates shall be tested as per the IS 2386 and they should satisfy the specifications of the
MoRT&H Specifications (2013). Since open graded aggregates coated with a binder is
compacted by a road roller, Los Angeles Abrasion value should be less than 30% to eliminate
crushing of aggregates during the rolling.
Any gradation of surface dressing, open graded premix carpet, stone matrix asphalt (specified
by MORT&H guidelines) which can result in air voids (in terms of VMA) of 25% or more
can be considered as suitable gradation for CGBM (Suresha et al. 2007).
The binder can be bitumen or modified bitumen satisfying IS 73 (2006) and IRC: SP:53
(2010) standards. The binder type should be chosen according to the location of the site and
the weather conditions. The effect of the binder type on grout penetration is not quite
significant, but use of stiffer binder will result in stiffer mixes.
Cementitious grout consists of cement, sand, water and additives, such as flyash, micro-silica,
super plasticizer in suitable proportion so as to produce a material that it can flow easily into
the voids of the bituminous mix and subsequently achieve strength. Though aggregates
bridges over the mortar and bears most of the load applied by traffic, the grout should be
strong enough to resist the stresses caused by traffic without crumbling.
iii
Ordinary Portland cement, Portland Pozzolanic Cement, Slag cement etc. which are used for
normal concrete road construction, can be used in preparation of the cement grout. The
specifications should follow IS-12269 (1987).
The fine sand to be used in the cement grout should pass 0.6mm size so that the grout can
enter into the voids easily.
Fly ash, silica, super plasticizer etc. can be used so as to increase the performance and also
can be used to get the required fluidity at the lower water contents for cement grout.
o It should be sufficiently flowable so that it can occupy the void space of the
aggregate skeleton. If however the viscosity is low, the grout will flow down
through the aggregate pores and strength will not be achieved.
o The small particles present in the grout should not pose difficulty for the easy
flow of the grout through the aggregate voids.
The flowability of cement grout is to be measured in Marsh flow cone (Al-Qadi et al. 1994,
ASTM C476 2010) as shown in Fig.1. The cement grout should satisfy the following
properties:
Property
Flowability
Guidelines
measured
Value
7-9 seconds for 1 litre grout
Flexural strength
Minimum 7 MPa
iv
Binder content for cement grouted bituminous mix should be about 2.0 to 2.5% by weight of
the aggregates so that there is a minimum of 25% air voids in mineral aggregates (VMA)
after the compaction by a road roller.
For preparing the samples, requisite compaction should be applied (in three tamping stages)
on the mix placed in a mould. The samples are air-cooled overnight while these remained
inside the mould. Cement grout (prepared as per Section 2.3) is slowly poured at the top of
the sample. The collar of the Marshall sample helps to hold the liquid grout on the top of the
sample. A portion of the top surface is kept empty, so that air (displaced by grout) can move
out. Grout is poured on this portion is poured at the end when grout has occupied most of the
accessible air-voids within the mix. This has been schematically explained in Figure 2.
(a) compacted bituminous (b) grout is poured to the (c) grout occupies all the
mix sample
sample
The sample subjected to moist curing for 2 days and then taken out from the mould. The mix
should satisfy the following recommended values
Test
Indirect tensile strength
Guidelines
ASTM D 4123
Recommended value
Min
100
kPa
(at
40 C)
Compressive strength
ASTM C 109
ASTM D 1075
90%
Modulus of rupture
ASTM C 78
1500 kPa
IS:9284
The optimum grout content (composition) and optimum bitumen content will be finalized for
the mixes which satisfies the above requirements.
Elastic layered analysis applied for the analysis of flexible pavements can be used for the
design of composite pavement also. Various parameters for design are CBR of the soil,
vi
elastic moduli of the granular layers, elastic moduli of the grouted bituminous layers,
Poisons ratio of different layers, design traffic in terms of standard axles. Temperature has
less effect of the elastic modulus of the grouted bituminous layers due to the presence of
cementitious grout, and hence may be neglected in the design process.
The fatigue equation obtained at Nottingham University (Oliveira et al. 2008) from four point
bending test at 10 hz frequency is given as,
N = 2.7 10 9 t
3.9718
Eq.1
where, N= fatigue life in number of standard axle repetitions and t= tensile strain at the
bottom of the CGBM layer. Equation 1 has a shift factor of 45, this takes care of the
calibration due to field performance. Thickness of pavement using CGBM can be done using
the fatigue Equation 1. Modulus of different types of bases, subbases and subgrades can be
taken from IRC:37:2012.
Based on studies done at Nottingham University and IIT Kharagpur, the elastic modulus of
CGBM can be taken as 8000 MPa (Oliveira et al. 2008). After the expiry of the fatigue life,
the elastic modulus of the CGBM layer may be assumed to be reduced by 50%.
If a low volume road has CGBM premix carpet, its contribution to the pavement strength may
be neglected. Such wearing course however may last longer than the conventional seal coat
due to its resistance to water damage.
Design a pavement with CGBM surfacing for design traffic 50msa. The elastic modulus of
subbase and subgrade can be taken as 300 MPa and 100 MPa, respectively.
vii
A three layer pavement structure constituted with CGBM, granular base and subgrade layer
assumed. The allowable tensile strain at the bottom of the CGBM layer is obtained from Eq.
1 as 80 10 6 .
Assuming sub-base thickness as 400 mm, the CGBM layer thickness is iteratively obtained as
175 mm (for allowable strain as 80 10 6 ).
Subgrade strain is obtained to be much lower than what is permitted by IRC:37;2012.
A four layer pavement structure constituted with CGBM, DBM granular base and subgrade
layer assumed. The thickness of CGBM layer and sub-base layers are assumed as 35mm and
400 mm respectively. The elastic modulus of DBM is taken as 1700 MPa (VG40 bitumen at
35oC average annual pavement temperature). The allowable tensile strain at the bottom of the
CGBM layer is obtained from Eq. 1 as 80 10 6 . The allowable tensile strain at the bottom
of the DBM layer for 50 msa traffic and 80% reliability is obtained as (from IRC:37 2012)
235.4 10 6 .
For a thickness of 100 mm of DBM, the horizontal tensile strain the bottom of CGBM layer
is obtained as 43.1 10 6 and the horizontal tensile strain 235.4 10 6 . Thus, the pavement
structure can be designed as CGBM 35 mm, DBM 100 mm, sub-base 400 mm and subgrade.
5.0 Construction
CGBM can be constructed on any stable bituminous/ concrete layer. The following
construction steps are to be followed.
o Heating of the aggregates and bitumen are done in hot mix plant.
o The porous asphalt mix is laid.
o When the temperature comes down to 50-60oC, cement mortar is applied on the
prepared porous asphalt surface. It should automatically occupy the voids due to
viii
gravity. Roller in vibration mode may be used to facilitate the process. Grout work
should not proceed in rainy or snowy environment.
o No construction joint is necessary for CGBM construction.
o Moist curing needs to be done in accordance with **.
o The road can be opened to traffic after 3 days. If the traffic is pedestrian it can be
opened after 1 day. If the traffic axle load is expected to be higher the curing period
should longer.
o The surface should be mechanically/ manually broomed to create texture on the
surface.
o The surface texture should be evaluated with sand patch testing in accordance with **
minimum skid resistance value should ** for dry condition and ** for wet condition.
6.0 Maintenance
References
Al-Qadi, I., Gouru, H., and Weyers, R. E., Asphalt Portland cement concrete composite: laboratory evaluation,
Journal of Transportation Engineering, 120(1), 1994, pp.94-108.
Anderton, G. L., 2000, Engineering properties of resin modified pavement (RMP) for mechanistic design,
Geotechnical Laboratory, U. S. Army Engineering Research and Development Center, ERDC/GL TR-00-2.
<http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA376263>, last accessed July 12, 2013.
ASTM C109,
Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength Hydraulics Cement Mortar 50mm Cube,
ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2010.
ASTM C 476-10, Standard Specification for Grout for Masonry, ASTM International, West Conshohocken,
2010.
ASTM C937-10, Standard Specification for Grout Fluidifier for Preplaced Aggregate Concrete, ASTM
International, West Conshohocken, 2010.
CRRI, Evaluation of ACC Marg overlaid road sections, report submitted by Central Road Research Institute,
sponsored by Associated Cement Companies India Pvt. Ltd., Research and Consultancy Directorate, Thane,
2002.
IS-73, Specifications for Paving Bitumen, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2006.
IS-12269, Specification for 53 grade ordinary Portland cement, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2008.
IS:9284, Method of test for abrasion resistance of concrete,
IS: 2386, (Part IV), Friction tester, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1963.
ix
IRC: SP 53, Tentative guideline on use of polymer and rubber modified bitumen in road construction, Indian
Roads Congress, New Delhi, 2002.
Gawedziniki, M., (2008) Evaluation of semi-flexible (resin modified) pavement 12008-1, Illinois Department of
Transportation Bureau of Materials and Physical Research.
MORT&H, (2013) Specifications for Roads and Bridge Works, 5th Revision, Ministry of Surface Road
Transport and Highways, Government of India, published by IRC.
Oliveira, J. R., Zoorob, S. E., Thom, N. H., and Pereira, P. A., (2007) A simple approach to the design of
pavements incorporating grouted macadams, 4th International Conference Bituminous Mixtures and Pavements,
Thessaloniki, Greece.
Oliveira, J. R., Thom, N. H., and Zoorob, S. E., (2006) Fracture and Fatigue Strength of Grouted Macadams,
10th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Quebec City, Canada, vol. 1, pp. 225-34.
Oliveira J. R., Sangiorgi C., Fattorini G., and Zoorob S. E., (2009) Investigating the fatigue performance of
grouted macadams, Transport, 162(TR2), pp. 115-123.
Oliveira, J. R., Thom, N. H., and Zoorob, S. E., (2008) Design of Pavements Incorporating Grouted Macadams,
Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, 134(1), pp. 7-14.
Suresha, S. N., Ravi Shankar, A. U., George, V., Investigation of porous friction courses and mixes: a brief
overreview, Indian Highways, July 2007.
Wu, D. Q., The semi-rigid pavement with higher performances for roads and parking aprons, CAFEO 29,
Sustainable Urbanization Engineering Challenges and Opportunities, November 27-30, 2011, Brunei
Darussalam, pp.1-7.