Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 24 November 2011
Received in revised form 3 July 2012
Accepted 7 July 2012
Available online 16 July 2012
Keywords:
Hybrid process
Water treatment
Hydrocyclone
Coagulation
Flocculation
Natural water
a b s t r a c t
This research deals with a hybrid hydrocyclone process, involving micro-bubbles injection generated by
the dissolved air otation technique; the micro-bubbles allow the aerated ocs formed by coagulation
and occulation to be separated inside the hydrocyclone. The oc separation is induced by centrifugal
force. The lighter phase moves toward the center of the hydrocyclone and the heavier one to the wall.
This hybrid process is intended for natural water or industrial raw water and would be performed as
an industrial water treatment process. For this study, the hybrid hydrocyclone process was performed
under steady state conditions with natural water coming from the river Marne. Efciencies of 61 4% for
turbidity decrease and 77 20% for suspended solids removal were obtained. The separation efciency
between the claried water and the ocs reached 95 10%. This process achieved continuous operation
with 1000 L/h inlet ow. In industrial wastewater treatment, which requires a reliable, compact and
efcient process, this hybrid technology shows strong potential, with a signicant reduction of the plant
footprint.
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Removing suspended solids is a common goal of most water
treatment processes. Although ltration has commonly been used
for this purpose, alternative processes, such as hydrocycloning,
have been proposed. Menezes et al. [1] worked on coagulation and
occulation in a dynamic separator based on a swirling motion to
remove silica (500 mg/L) and clay particles (50 mg/L). Their study
used a coagulation process in conjunction with a dynamic separator to separate the solid phase (silica and clay) from the water
phase. Rubio and Rosa [2] used a occulation and otation process
to produce aerated polymeric ocs of an emulsied oil dispersion
followed by separation in a centrifuge cell. Nowadays, no compact
system combines simultaneous coagulation, occulation, otation
and separation in a single device. Most of the previous studies used
only synthetic raw water but never tested real raw water of very
low turbidity. The hybrid hydrocyclone process evaluated during
this study combines coagulation, occulation, otation and hydrocycloning. It was tested using natural waters.
2.1.1. Coagulation
The coagulation process used aluminum sulfate WAC HB in
liquid form and a Fluidcontrol static mixer (PMS15-4-316LDIN2576, IMP 3419), as shown in Fig. 1(a). The raw water was
pumped through the static mixer at 1000 L/h in order to obtain
the best shear stress to perform the initial occulation. Meanwhile,
the coagulant solution was injected into the system before the raw
water passed the static mixer. The 35-m-long tube of diameter
10
Varied parameter
Experimental value
2.2. Experiments
The study worked with natural water from the river Marne. The
experiments were performed during two summer months at the
Veolia research center of Annet in France. The Marne water quality
during the entire period was quite good with very low turbidity
ranging between 5 and 15 NTU, a pH ranging between 7.9 and 8.31
and a temperature close to 22 C. Each assay with the hybrid hydrocyclone lasted 1 h and each one was triplicated for the different
parameters under test reported in Table 1. The jar test helped to
characterize and dene the best operating conditions, and the ow
characterization evaluated the hydrodynamic conditions suited to
operation with natural water. Each step is described in detail below.
2.2.1. The jar test experiment
This jar test approach was a preliminary study for the hybrid
process to predict the coagulation and occulation that could occur
in the hybrid process. However, in a jar test, the micro-bubbles are
not taken into account. The phenomenon would not be exactly the
same, but it is hypothesized that the jar test study is efcient for
determining suitable coagulant and occulant concentrations for
the hybrid hydrocyclone process.
The jar test was performed in order to study the conditions that
could be expected to exist in the hydrocyclone, to nd the optimum
coagulation and occulation concentration, and to test the effect of
coagulation and occulation time. The tests were conducted using
Table 1
Parameters under test for the hybrid process study with Marne river water.
Experimental steps
Parameters studied
1. Jar test
2. Hybrid process on
Marne river water
Experimental values
Parameter controlled
Experimental values
1000 L/h
1h
10
% Optical Density
decrease
70
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
removal
% Turbidity
11
60
50
40
30
20
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 minute
15 minutes
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Coagulant concentration (mg/L)
30 seconds
1 minute
70
15 minutes
Fig. 3. Jar test turbidity and optical density removals with 0.1 ppm polymer at different occulation times.
the raw waters and the efuent collected at the wall zone. The performance of the hybrid hydrocyclone with respect to its ability to
reduce suspended solids was evaluated by calculating the reduction
(as %) in turbidity and suspended solids between the wall and aerated zones (central zone). This was done in order to account for the
addition of coagulant/occulation within the treatment process. To
calculate the suspended solids reductions, the ow rate partition
ratio (30:70) was considered.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Identication of proper operating conditions
3.1.1. Coagulation and occulation
The jar test experiment was carried out setting the coagulation and occulation times equal to the conditions that occur in
a hydrocyclone reactor. The coagulation process was followed by
the UV 254 nm absorbance at 1 min of coagulation mixing. For the
occulation process, the experiment was accomplished by varying the occulation time. Result examples are reported in Fig. 3(a)
and (b) for turbidity and absorbant removals, respectively (occulant 0.1 mg/L). It showed that 30 s of occulation could remove
80% of the turbidity (coagulant 50 mg/L). Moreover, increasing the
coagulant and occulant concentration up to 50 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L,
respectively, led to higher turbidity and organic matter removals. In
order to explain the unexpected drop observed in Fig. 3 at 60 mg/L,
it is important to mention that during the experiments conducted
on the water quality of La Marne river, the inlet raw water turbidity
could daily change. For example, with the jar test results reported in
Fig. 3(a) and (b), the raw water turbidity for 50 mg/L coagulant concentration condition was 15.6 NTU, while it was 5.7 NTU at 60 mg/L.
Consequently, the lower raw water turbidity was more difcult
to agglomerate and form the oc even though the coagulant concentration was higher [10]. However, others jar test experiments
performed with a constant water quality showed that an optimum
coagulant concentration was obtained at 70 mg/L.
In any case, this part of the study indicated that 1 min of coagulation stage and 30 s of occulation stage could remove the turbidity
and the organic matter if suitable coagulant and occulant concentrations were used; it suggested that it could work in the hybrid
hydrocyclone process.
3.1.2. Flotation and ow partition inside the hydrocyclone
The optimum ow rate of the air-saturated water was 100 L/h,
which was 10% of the raw inlet ow rate. The air-saturated water
12
Fig. 4. Percentage decreases of ltered UV absorbance at center and wall zones with
0.1 mg/L occulant and for different coagulant concentrations.
Fig. 5 reports the percentage reduction of turbidity and the suspended solids removal for the two coagulant concentrations tested
and 0.1 mg/L as occulant concentration. The percentage reduction
reported in Fig. 5 considered the water treatment process by comparing claried water with the raw inlet water. It can be seen that
70 mg/L coagulant concentration gives high decrease of turbidity
and suspended solids removal (61 4% and 77 20%, respectively).
Note that, for a coagulant concentration of 30 mg/L, the suspended
solids experimental error is very important (more than 50%), and it
can lead to positive or negative values of % removal close to zero. So
we can assume that small removal efciency occurs for suspended
solid particles. At this low concentration, two parameters can justify this high uncertainty: the raw water inlet had low turbidity
(less than 10 NTU) and only 100 mL of sample was used to analyze
suspended solids in this study, which was not enough for good accuracy at low coagulant concentration with the ltration method. It
would be advisable to increase the volume of the sample in future
work to achieve greater accuracy on the mass of suspended solids
in the raw water.
Fig. 6 reports the turbidity and suspended solids separation
efciency measured for the two coagulant concentrations under
test with a constant occulant concentration of 0.1 mg/L. Considering the separation performed by the hybrid process described in
Fig. 1(b), the oc concentration measured in water samples from
the central zone is compared with that related to the wall zone. Separation efciencies for turbidity and suspended solids were each
calculated as the difference between the center zone and the wall
zone over the center zone. It can be seen from the measured turbidity that the separation phenomena occurred with these two
coagulant concentrations. With 70 mg/L coagulant concentration,
13
% Turbidity decrease
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.1 mg/L
0.2 mg/L
0.5 mg/L
Flocculant concentration
Fig. 7. Percentage turbidity decrease with different occulant concentrations (at
constant coagulant concentration 70 mg/L).
Fig. 8. Percentage separation of turbidity and suspended solids between center and
wall zone (at constant coagulant concentration of 70 mg/L).
14
the same occulant polymer (0.1 mg/L), indicating that not only
the occulant polymer but also the air-saturated water ow rate
plays an important role in the occulation process. The 50 L/h airsaturated water ow rate did not produce aerated ocs that could
be separated by the vortex ow.
The 100 L/h air-saturated water ow gave excellent percentage turbidity reduction and suspended solids removal (61 4%
and 77 20%, respectively), while 200 L/h led to 48 4% turbidity
decrease and 58 20% suspended solids removal. The hybrid process achieved good water treatment and was able to remove the
oc particles in the water.
Varying the pressurized air ow rate affected the separation
efciency in the hybrid process as shown in Fig. 9. These conditions show that differences in turbidity and suspended solids exist
between the wall zone and the central zone. This means that the
idea of creating aerated ocs that can be separated by the vortex
ow inside the hydrocyclone is valid. The reproducibility of the turbidity values implies stable operation, as the samples were taken
at different times during 1 h of operation.
The 50 L/h air-saturated water ow rate gave 15 6% separation
efciency on turbidity and 27 10% for suspended solids, while
there was no percentage reduction at this ow rate. Apparently,
this low air-saturated water ow rate could not produce enough
micro-bubbles to support the separation process in the sense of
creating aerated ocs.
In contrast, the 200 L/h air-saturated water ow rate, i.e. 20% of
the raw water ow rate, provided the proper separation conditions,
i.e. thickening in the central zone and clarifying in the wall zone. It
resulted in 55 6% separation efciency on turbidity and 83 10%
separation efciency on suspended solids.
The 100 L/h pressurized air/water ow rate produced 61 6%
separation efciency in turbidity and 95 10% separation efciency
on suspended solids. It was found that a higher air-saturated water
ow rate (200 L/h) gave poorer results than 100 L/h. This shows that
there is a certain optimum pressurized air ow rate that leads to
a good embedding mechanism between the micro bubble and the
oc.
Additionally, the ow rate ratio of 1000 L/h of treated water to
100 L/h of air-saturated water was satisfactory because the 1:10
ratio of air-saturated to raw water ow rate does not exceed the
ratio corresponding to the classical otation process. In conventional DAF, the typical proportion of air-saturated water in treated
water is 1550% (0.150.50 air fraction) and operating pressures
can vary in the range of 37 bars (Monod [10]; Kiuru and Vahala
[11]). This is an advantage in the hybrid process from the economics point of view. Another advantage of the hybrid process is
the retention time: 1 min and 30 s. It shows that the process is very
compact compared to conventional water treatment coagulation,
occulation and separation, which takes at least 30 min.
Overall, in experiments performed with natural water from the
river Marne, the application of the hybrid process with coagulation, occulation and otation performed in a single hydrocyclone
contactor, was successful. The aerated ocs occurring in the process
had a low mass density and could improve separation by the hydrocyclone mechanism. The minimum outlet water turbidity obtained
from continuous operation of the hybrid process reached 3.30 NTU.
This value is successful if we consider our initial objective of hybrid
process validation in continuous operation; however, it is perhaps
still not low enough to justify industrial hybrid hydrocyclone development.
The difculty of this process was to nd the optimum coagulant
and occulant concentrations, the optimum air fraction and also
the best hydrodynamics inside the system. The optimum oc size is
necessary to produce aerated ocs. Then, the aerated oc should be
able to rise and be separated by the vortex ow inside the hydrocyclone. This cannot happen if ocs are large or heavy. The occulant
15
[9] Metcalf, Eddy, Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, 4th ed.,
McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004.
[10] J. Monod, Water Treatment Handbook, vol. 1, 6th ed., Rueil-Malmaison, Degrmont, 1991, pp. 136145.
[11] H. Kiuru, R. Vahala, Dissolved air otation in water and waste water treatment,
Water Science Techology 43 (2009) 815.