age of 2 520 pusan Baar, Caw ane wn 10 Wn 12 13 14 15, 16 7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ALAN RADER (S.B. #045789) LAW OFFICE OF ALAN RADER 1999 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-6035 Email: arader@araderlaw.com Telephone: (310) 246-6747 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sobini Films, Inc. and Mark Amin SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BC5 82989 SOBINI FILMS, INC. and MARK Case No. AMIN, COMPLAINT FOR: Plaintiffs, (1) BREACH OF CONTRACT; y. (2) BREACH OF THE IMPLIED CLEAR SKIES NEVADA, LLC, COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND VOLTAGE PICTURES, LLC, and FAIR DEALING; DOES | through 20, inclusive, - (3) FRAUD (PROMISE MADE Defendants. | WITHOUT INTENT TO PERFORM); | ¢ TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ER, PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION/SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. \ @ | ef RED. fount its Anges MAY 2°7 2015 ‘Sheri. OfoeniClet ®. Deeuty zpogea9eHoa #4 141338 of nos oras sabe COMPEAINT oot 2 Rayet £ - ec zB = 2618303688 ~ Doo Type = OTMtrage 2 ot 28) weer nueen 10 MW 2 1B 14 15 16 7 18 19 20 21 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 ‘Nature of Action and General Allegations 1. For movie producers, “single card” credit—that is, being credited alone on the sereen—is the gold standard. It brings significant and well-recognized professional and ‘economic value. Plaintiff Mark Amin, through his production company; plaintiff Sobini Films, bargained for that gold standard credit, paid handsomely for it, and worked hard to earn it on the recently released motion picture “Good Kill.” (That picture concems drone Warfare and stars Fthan Hawke and January Jones.) Defendants Clear Skies Nevada and Voltage Pictures, which own “Good Kill,” gladly took $1.3 million of Sobini’s money and ‘Amin’s personal producing efforts, The written, December 9, 2013, Term Sheet (“Term Sheet”) agreement between Sobini and defendants regarding “Good Kill” guarantees Amin a single card “Produced by” credit in the main titles. To get defendants’ promise of that special treatment for Amin, Sobini agreed to accept a lower share of the film’s profits than it would otherwise be entitled to. 2, But defendants intentionally breached their promise of single card credit for ‘Amin, In July 2014 —ten months before the picture’s May 15, 2015 release— they were told by Sobini that an early version did not have Amin’s credit on a single card, as promised, but buried it in a greatly inferior position at the bottom of a card headed by two of defendants’ executives, At the time, defendants promised to correct their error, but that was a fraudulent promise, made to induce Sobini and Amin to take no action. Last month, Sobini told defendants the picture still did not properly credit Amin—and defendants again falsely promised to take the contractually required corrective steps. One indication that those promises were intentionally false is that Amin’s personal request for his rightful credit was responded to by Voltage’s chief executive with this arrogant and dismissive email: “Thanks for never calling us ever again.” Another indication of defendants’ bad faith was their refusal to comply with their contractual obligation to make “good faith efforts” to correct their admitted mistake unless plaintiff first agreed to “waive their right to pursue any claim in connection with the credit error.” ‘poo £ Faget 2 - Doo JD = 2615398643 = Doo type = CERceage 3 of 10) temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, to stop defendants from continuing to distribute copies of “Good Kill” that omit Amin’s single card credit. Plaintiffs also seek specific performance, in the form of a permanent injunction, requiring defendants to comply with their contractual obligation by replacing all previously distributed copies of the picture with a corrected version containing Amin’s proper credit. Parties 1 3, In addition to money damages, plaintifis seck immediate judicial relief, by | 4. Plaintiff Sobini Films (“Sobini”) is a Los Angeles-based independent motion | Cea anwa wn picture production and financing company. It has been involved in the production of 16 10 | films, including the well-known “Girl Most Likely,” starring Kristen Wiig, Annette 11 | Benning and Matt Dillon, “The Prince and Me,” starring Julia Stiles, and “Peaceful 12 | Warrior,” starring Nick Nolte. It currently has several pictures in development. 13 5. Plaintiff Mark Amin (“Amin”) is Sobi founder and CEO. Before that, Amin 14 | founded and chaired Trimark Pictures and was Vice Chairman of Lionsgate Films. Amin 15 || is an express third party beneficiary of the December 9, 2013 “Term Sheet” contract, 16 | between Sobini and defendants. 7 6. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and on that basis allege, that defendant 18 | Clear Skies Nevada, LLC (“Clear Skies”) is a Nevada limited liability company with its 19 | principal place of business in Los Angeles, California. Plaintiffs are also informed and 20 | believe, and on that basis allege, that Clear Skies is a single purpose entity, formed, 21 | controlied, and owned by defendant Voltage Pictures, to produce the picture “Good Kill.” 22 7. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and on that basis allege, that defendant 23 | Voltage Pictures, LLC is a California limited liability company with its principal place of 24 | business in Los Angeles, California, which was founded in 2005 and has been involved in 25 | the production ofa number of motion pictures. In the Term Sheet, Voltage agrees, as 26 | “Guarantor,” to be bound by the Term Sheet and to guarantee Clear Skies’ performance. 27 8. The true names, identities, and culpabilities of defendants Doe 1 through Doe 28 | 20 are presently unknown to plaintiff, who therefore sue them under fictitious names. “2. COMPLAINT Doct 1 Pages 2 = Deo TD = 1615393643 - Doo Type = OTEK(wage ¢ of 30) 1 | Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and on that basis allege, that each defendant designated as a Doe is to some extent legally responsible for the events, occurrences, and damages alleged in this complaint. Plaintiffs will amend to insert the true names and identities of the fictitiously named defendants when they learn them. 9. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and on that basis allege, that each defendant acted as the agent, servant, representative, partner, joint-venturer, and/or employee of the other defendants and, in doing the things alleged in this complaint, was acting wit in the scope of such agency and/or employment and with the knowledge, permission, consent and/or ratification of the other defendants. Soamyur sven Ww HIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 2 Breach of Contract B (AIL Plai 14 10. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate by this reference all of the allegations in 15 | paragraphs 1-9, above, as though set forth in full. iffs Against All Defendants) 16 11, Section 5(b) of the Term Sheet, entitled “Amin Credit,” provides in part as 17 | follows: “Mark Amin shall be entitled to: one (1) individual producer credit on screen, in 18 | no less than third position of all ‘Produced by’ credits, on a single card, which credit shall 19 | appear in the main title of the Picture ... The size of the credit accorded to Mark Amin 20 | shalt be no smaller than the size of the credit accorded to any other individual producer.” 2 12, Defendants materially breached that provision. The picture does not provide 22 | Amin an individual “Produced by” on a single card. And Amin fully eared that credit. 23 | Not only did Sobini, his production company, contribute 50% of the equity for the picture, 24 | he personally provided creative notes on the script; consulted on the casting and 25 } production staff; contributed the services of two Sobini production executives; was on set 26 || for almost the entirety of the shoot, working closely with the director; consulted on all 27 | aspects of the post-production process; and more. Thus plaintiffs have performed, and at 28 | all times have been ready, willing, and able to perform, all of the contractual conditions = doe TD = 1638893642 ~ Doe ype = OTe(rage 5 of 18) wawe en 10 u 12 43, 4 15 16 7 18 19 20 24 2 23 24 25 26 7 28 and obligations under the Term Sheet, except for those excused, waived or rendered impossible by defendants? breach. Plaintifis have never been in default of any of their obligations under the Term Sheet. 13. Section 5(e) of the Term Sheet, also dealing with credit, and titled “General,” provides in part as follows: “No casual or inadvertent failure of Clear Skies to comply with the credit requirements ... shall constitute a breach of this Agreement.” But that provision does not excuse defendants’ failure to provide Amin single card credit on | “Good Kill” because their failure to do so was neither “casual” nor “inadvertent.” Ten months ago, on or about July 16, 2014, Sobini Vice President Tyler Boehm notified ‘Voltage Pictures Vice President Zev Foreman that the then-current version of “Good Kill” failed to provide Amin single card credit, Foreman told Boehm “not to worry about it” because the wrong credits he saw were “temporary” and would be corrected before the film was released. That never occurred, and plaintiffs are informed and believe, and on that basis allege, that defendants” failure to provide Amin his proper credit was i intentional. ! 14, Defendants also materially breached their contractual obligations by refusing to comply with their contractual obligation to make “good faith efforts” to correct their admitted credit mistake unless plaintiffs would first “waive their right to pursue any claim in connection with the credit error.” 15, Section 5(e) of the Term Sheet also provides that “If Clear Skies or a third party fils to accord Sobini credit. . nothing shall require Clear Skies to cease using or to replace prints ... then in existence.” That provision, by ifs terms, applies only to Sobini’s company credit under section 5(a) of the Term Sheet, and does not apply to defendants” breach of their credit obligations to Amin, Defendants intentionally breached those obligations by refusing to provide Amin single card credit, refusing to correct the credits on the picture, and refusing to provide third-party distributors with a corrected version of the picture. ook 1 Pagob § ~ Boo ID = 1615393648 - oo Type = OTHER(age 6 of 18) 1 16. Asa direct and proximate result of defendants” intentional breaches of the credit provisions of the Term Sheet, plaintiffs have been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial, but not less than $500,000. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION Breach of the Imy Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing (All Plaintiffs Against All Defendants) 17, Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate by this reference all of the allegations in paragraphs 1-16, above, as though set forth in full. Cm rane en 10 18. The Term Sheet contains an implied covenant that defendants will act in good 11 | faith and deal fairly with plaintiffs, and will refrain from any acts which would prevent 12 | plaintifis from obtaining the intended benefits of the Term Sheet. 3 19. That implied covenant provides that defendants must use their best efforts to 14 } ensure that Amin will receive his promised single card credit on the picture and to remedy 15 | any defect in the picture’s provision of credit to him. The invocation of that covenant is 16 | necessary to ensure that Sobini and Amin are not deprived of an important element of 17 | their consideration for entering into the Term Sheet. 18, 20. Defendants materially breached the implied covenant of good faith and dealing 19 | in the Producer Agreement by: (a) failing to provide Amin the agreed-upon single card 20 | credit on the picture; (b) refusing to make any effort to cure their failure to provide him 24 | the credit due him; (c) refusing to replace versions of the picture provided to third parties 22 | without Amin’s correct, single card, credit; and (4) refusing to make corrections unless 23 | plaintiffs first released defendants of any liability. 24 21. Asa direct and proximate result of defendants’ intentional breaches of the 25 | implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, plaintiffs have been damaged in an 26 } amount to be proven at trial, but not less than $500,000. 27 ' 28 | cgi COMPLAINT oot 1 raget 6 - Doe ED = 1618393643 - Doe Type = oni 1 ‘THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION Fraud -- Promise Made Without Intention of Performing It (Civil Code § 1710(4)) (All Plaintiffs Against All Defendants) 22, Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate by this reference all of the allegations in paragraphs 1-21, above, as though set forth in full. 2 3 4 5 6 23. On or about July 16, 2014, Voltage Pictures Vice President Zev Foreman 7 | promised, on behalf of defendants, that they would correct the failure of the then-current 8 | version of the “Good Kill” so that Amin would receive his contractually promised, single 9 | card, “Produced by” credit. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and on that basis allege, 10 | that at the time defendants made that promise they had no intention of performing it, but, 11 | instead, made that promise to induce plaintiffs to forebear from taking legal action to 12. | ensure that Amin received his proper credit. Plaintiffs did not know of defendants’ secret | 13 | intention not to perform and reasonably relied on the representations of their producing 14 | “parmers.” Had plaintiffs known of the actual facts, they would have taken legal action 15 | immediately. | 16 24. On or about April 22, 2015, Sobini learned that defendants never honored their 17 | promise to correct Amin’s credit, Sobini’s President, Cami Winikoff therefore emailed 18 | Voltage’s chief executive, Nic Chartier, and asked that Amin’s eredit “be corrected” to 19 | conform with the terms of the Term Sheet. Defendants response was a series of excuses 20 | and Chartier’s “Thanks for never calling us ever again” email. au 25. Asa direct and proximate result of defendants’ promises without any intention 22 | ofperforming them, plaintiffs have been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial, but 23 | not less than $500,000. 26. Plaintiffs are also informed and believe, and on that basis allege, that 25 | defendants’ promises without any intention of performing them—an actionable fraud 26 | under Civil Code section 1710(4)—were made in bad faith to deprive plaintiffs of their 27 | egal rights or otherwise cause them injury and therefore justifies an award of exemplary 28 | and punitive damages. a ‘COMPLAINT Deck 1 Bageb 7 — Doo ID = 1618193683 - Doo Type = omcage 8 of 1) 1 FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION | 2 ‘Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, 3 and Permanent Injunction/Specific Performance | 4 (All Plaintiffs Against All Defendants) | 5 27. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate by this reference all of the allegations in | 6 | paragraphs 1-26, above, as though set forth in full. 7 28, Money damages will not, by themselves, be an adequate remedy for | 8 | defendants’ failure to provide Amin a single card “Produced By” credit. Money damages 9 | cannot fully compensate for plaintiffs’ for their loss of future professional opportunities, 10 | nor can they fully compensate Amin for his loss of personal rewards. In addition, those 11 | money damages will be difficult to ascertain. 12 29. Plaintiffs have no speedy ot adequate remedy at law as the harm to plaintiffs is i 13 | irreparable. Unless restrained and enjoined by order of this Court, defendants will 14 | continue to ignore and flout their contractual obligations to give Amin single card credit. 15 30, ‘The extent of the damage caused by defendants’ refusal to comply with their 16 | contractual damages can be limited by: 7 (a) a temporary restraining and preliminary injunction restraining defendants, their 18 | agents, licensees, and other persons acting on their behalf or under their authority, from 19 | further distribution of copies of the motion picture “Good Kill” that do not contain a 20 | single card “Produced By” credit to Mark Amin in the main titles; and 2 (b) a permanent injunction/order of specific performance compelling defendants to 2 comply with the December 19, 2013 Term Sheet by providing all parties 23 authorized to display or distribute in any form or format ‘the motion picture “Good 24 Kill” a revised version containing a single card “Produced By” credit to Mark \ ~ 25 Amin in the main titles. i ; 26 27 28 aT Pe COMRLAINT ‘boot 1 Rageh # ~ Doc 1D = 2618983643 ~ Doo Type = onIEE(rage Sof 18) e e 1 PRAYER FOR RELIEF 2 WHEREFORE, plaintiffs pray for judgment as follows: 3 1, For damages in an amount to be proven at trial, but not less than $500,000; | 4 2. For an award of exemplary and punitive damages against defendants, and each 5 of them, in an amount to be proven at trial; 6 3. For a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction restraining | | 1 defendants, their agents, licensees, and other persons acting on their behalf or i 8 under their authority, from further distribution of copies of the motion picture 9 “Good Kill” that do not contain a single card “Produced By” credit to Mark Amin 10 in the main titles; u 4, For a permanent injunction/order of specific performance compelling 2 defendants to comply with the December 19, 2013 Term Sheet by providing all 13 parties authorized to display or distribute in any form or format the motion picture 14 “Good Kill” a revised version containing a single card “Produced By” credit to 15 ‘Mark Amin in the main titles; 16 5. For their costs and expenses in this action; and 7 6. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. | | 18 19 | Dated: May 27, 2015. | = PAW OEFICE OF ALAN RADER : Lo 2 a 24 ‘Alan Rader | Attorneys for Plaintifts 28 \ 26 sour aes -8- v COMPLAINT oot 2 pages 8 ~ Doc 19 = 2628383663 - Doe Type = ONEERrage 19 of 14) TE tae | = raxcamrarnas 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 700 FILED ve Rim. 310-246-6747 310-246-679 Bein aie eee rau sy att srry fornia: Plaintiffs Sobini Films and Mack Amin eee [surcRioR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles MAY 2°7 2015 sseccoress 111 N. Hill St. wun ooness: Same as above seh 10 : Stitorocnoe Los Angeles, CA 90012 oe ; cnazuay Cental Batt Tee Sobini Films, Inc. y. Clear Skies Nevada, LLC \ GIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ‘Complex Case Designation ae a tinted Ct Limited Unt Lina counter Cl amir = (BOF 82989 | demanded demanded is Filed with frst appearance by cefendant | “0% acon ssedares| “Nicumuessrona weaver | oom ‘ems £6 bolon musi be completed (see instructions on page 2 Fi Cheek one bon below forthe cate iype tha bes! describes ts case fu Te Saat Proviso Cons cv igtion i | Auto (22) ral ‘Breach of coniractwarranty (06) (G8l. Rules of Court, rules 2.400-3.403) 4 ‘Uninsured motorist (48) ule 3740 collections (09) ) Anivusirteade reputation 09) Oberrrom Pevena iuyrpnty —] Onorateee (0 Constance) Sumaponanr Baca) os steno 8) testo) atmo) Ohare TE Seen ton Product mabity (24) Real Property [) Environmental ox ton (20) ade mapacte 8) Co cron denne terrence sig ae : So oereowo an Serta ‘eee tive Nap on (oe Tr [Wore 2) au) Fa oe exeprte(or (} Sheen poets 28) ——_‘ftlacemant of dgmat ‘Civ rights (06) awful Dotainer (5) enforcement of judgment (20) uma) Corman serenmenes nt Compt Feaud (18) EI resisemat 2) ricoen TE) ntetectual property (19) TD ngs (38) te: cari no specie abo} 62) ‘Professional negagence (25) datictal Review Miscellaneous Civil Petition “Other non-PUPOAWD tort (95) ‘Aauat foseihore G5) Partnership and corporate gavernance (21) Emsloynant Fesion ation mats) CZ) oper tin a sented bo) (3) ‘ona tenston (8) [Ey viet ct mandate (02) wil oherensioyan 5) ones oven Thecese Lis LZ Tena complex under rule 3400 of he Caiornia Rules of Coun, ithe case is complex, mark tbe {acdors requiieg exceptional aia management 2) Large number at separately presented potes ¢.[] Large nerber of winesses DEE] extensive moton practie rising ificut r novel e.(_—] Coerinaton win related actions pening in one of more courts Issues tet wil be Ume-consurang to resole imothor counts, sites, or coures, oh a federal cout c(2] Substantial amount of documentary evidence +. [substantial postiudgmentjudicia! supervision 3. Remades sought (heck a tha aot) a] monetary “4. Number af causes of acton (spect) 4 5, Thiscase LJis CZ) snot adlassactonsut \ 8) Winera ara ary krow related cases le and ear a notice of related case. (You ma uss form AMro1A) spate May@, 2015 > “plan Rader Aten ae RT ERATOR ‘onmonetary: declaratory orinjunctve reef & CZ Jpunitive NOTICE ~[ paint must fe this cover shoot with tre fest paper Red inthe action of proceeding except smal clams cases o cases fled cra Probate Code, Family Goce, of Weltare and Ineltutons Code). (Cal Rules of Coun. ule 3.220, Fallure to fle ay result i sanctons += FISTHs Savor shectin acon to any cover sheet required by local court ule. ‘ths cose complex under uie 3.400 et seq ofthe Calforea Rules of Cour, you must serve a copy ofthis cover sheet on at ‘thor partes fe the action or proceeding, « Unless ths is cobections caze unr rule 3,740 o a complex case, tis cover sheet willbe used fr statistical purposes on Feqapomunan oe ‘CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET SENET bosons estes ‘mrss Pee ee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee get 10 peo 20 = 635392643 ~ Doc ype = OTHERof oe Sob Films, In. v. Clear Skies Nevada, LLC eee BC 5 82 989 CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION (CERTIFICATE OF GROUNDS FOR ASSIGNMENT TO COURTHOUSE LOCATION) ‘This form ig required pursuant to Local Rule 2.0 in all new civil cage Flings in the Los Angeles Superior Court. ltom 1. Check the types of hearing an filin the estimate length of hearing expected fr tis case: suey reat? WZ] ves ccassaction C] ves uwrencaser Lives nive estates FoR TRIALS CO ouns/(4 cays Item Il. Indicate the correct citrict and courthouse location (4 steps ~ If you checked “Limited Case", skip to Nem Il, Pg. 4): ‘Stop 1: After fist completing te Civil Case Cover Sheet form, find the main Civil Case Caver Sheet heading for your 26e inthe lot margin below, and, tothe right in Column A, the Civ Case Cover Shoot case type you selected ‘Step 2: Check one Superior Court type of action in Column B below which best describes the nature ofthis case. ‘Step 3: In Column C, circle the reason for the court location choice that apples to the type of action you have. ‘checked. For any exception to the court lation, see Local Rule 2.0, “Applicable Reasons for Choosing Courthouse Location (900 Cokin © below) 4 Seam uno etn a Mo Coo coal ga Lolo ogopayer apr at ie FE NSSAineen Gssrnr ree Vinay einte | i a teoan Acre ay EERE Ba ES eee EBS PReareeas | ‘Step 4: Flin the information requested on page 4 in tem Il; complete item IV. Sign the declaration. ! os a posta ha cate Cove Soe “yon nen hess Satie ee Se Sap Svone ae wuic@n | @ Ari Wom venan-Posoa nanrosenDonaneertéDewh [2.4 | ar ‘Uningured Motorist (48) | A7110 Personal injury/Propety Damage/Wrangtul Daath ~ Uninsured Motorist | 1.,2..4. T Pat70 Astess Pope Danese 2 = ere: 1 A7221. Asbestos -Pertona! nknyPWrergful Death 2 A eee alate od ai a ng | Memes |e son omer iencue toons a ~ ae 1 ATAED Ponies Usb (09. el area) ee wt rane |. A720 terentBoaynanPepery Daragatonsionsneeg. — | 4 ma eee rion tes 7 bata ian D_ATZTO Irtertonal Inficton of Emationsl Distress + :: i © A720 Other Personal injury!Property Damage/Wronahel Death Hate ! . 1 \LAGIY 309 (Rev. 03711), CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM ‘Local Rule 2.0 i jLASC Aparoved 03-04 AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION Page tof i oot 2 Faget £4 ~ Reo sD = 1615999643 ~ noc Type = OTHERrage 22 of 1 a aa Set Fins ne Cie Ove Nova - B c ao aee Smee sepeastromee enon eases, eens wis Sea mien |e hat Gor cameras Totrateneenonne (ws 5 oe ooo was £9 [career [2 Ao seman rst aa aS a ia ae ay Sea ease ae eee ws a © nat) Chu raya has re a 7 | === poem i Fined aueuacdersnas ia BL cmtasemenen 1D AB108 Labor Commisione Anpeals 0 Son tana sheamio Comeciestoumeacearararweraw [pg + sedans i Breach of Cerra Waray | agane. CorrciWaraty Bresch Sater Pani ro rautnepigence) a i (oornerance) |. AgOIaNeptgom Breach ot Conractvarany (ro Fou) Adah (© A628 ier Seach of ContraWaraty (nl fad ar nagigancs) hae | 3 1 Ae002 Collectane Case-Seller Pranttt 2.5.6, 2 ‘ctetens (9) g 1B. ABO12 Other Promisor NoteGotectons Ce 2s Tnsranc Coverage (18) | ABOIS lnsuance Coverage (tt anoles) 125 15746009 Contacual Fev overcennaon | 3 Tetons | “02? Oter Cental Dispulrot rescinsurneeaudrentoenc) ErsEOememTna® Te arn EnhentomainContemnsion Number ep 2 [eecqu even a0) [A520 rg Eton Coe ae 5 12 ASDIB. Morgane Foredosure 28 Cober eal Propeny 26) |. Aao82 Quel Tie 26. 1BAt000 ihe Rel Property nat eminent domain lnerdtenant, freasure) | 2.6. ny Graromnarcerre es | aan Una Deer Comarca tes wnat vst 2.6 = [ermwerowarertssemt [a satz0 Ueto ncnt ett rel eon) 2.8. . au Denes ine Pos Forecosur ‘| ee pee = : CUnaetsiDetner rae (9) [A822 Urol Deter Oras 28 me <= pa ACN 709 Row 0817) CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM Tocel Rule 20 LSC Arroved 6-04 AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION Page 2014 j ‘Dood 1 Faged 12 Doo I~ 1615399648 = Doc Type = OTHE(ap us of 1 SSRTTT ini Films, Inc. v. Clear Skies Nevada, LLC eae A 8 c | co Cake Cov Shest ‘ypectAcion Aggie Reazans- Galaga No (Chesson) See Sep 9 Above ‘ove Force (05) [ABO Ascot FortiGate 2.6 3. | remensoaracon ry [Dab Pebien to Compesconhmivcate Nite 28 k nt Wn Arad ua i Wetot Mandate (02) | A6t52 vite Mancaras on inte Cour Cate Mer 2 5 13 Asi83 wrt-Cne ned Cout Case Review 2 ' ‘the scat Review 09) [TASTED Ciher Wi ait Review 2.8 g__[antiusrtrave Reguation (5) ] 0 AB00S AnansiTade Reguaten or ee us i ‘line ving Mass Tot | gos cline ng Mase Tot 128 ST seams Ligon as) | Ae08 Seats Uaton Coxe 128 3 Ta Ton a aa | (= 2 E | ara comrage clas | pants insuance Covngesibonten compe cae on 128 | TASTY Site Sate Jogent 2.8 z 1D ASI60 Asa of van 2.8 i TE | cece, (220 een : 5 cf dudgmerto) | _agiao Adrinseabve Agency Aad (ot pada) 28 Gs 1D ABIT4 PetionCercate for Eni of adament on Unps Tax 28 6 ABt2 One: Erlrcenentt suger Caso 2.8.8 Z rico TD AGO Racking (RICO) Case T2.8 : af | ae {2 AEOD0 Dedtraory Reet Cry 1.2.8 : 33 corer compans | ASOD nce Rel nyt donetenarassmen 2.8 Bog | wetSretct Zine) ca | set at connec consan cae antnhansann) todet (2. Asoo ier Cu Compan andernercomalen) nae << — Fainachr Comarsion = asr13 Patpasho and Caprae Gommance Case za ‘Govemance (© AB121 Cl Haasement 2.308 ge 1 Ast29 wanepiee Harserest 2.3.8 53 ices 1 A6124 EleriDopancent Aas Abuse Case 2.3.9, \ EE | quiSertieaite) | Ato Reson cose es oo © AbI10 Pethion kr Charge Name at 1 A6ST0 lon er eet a Late Cin Lew 2.3.4.8 “ 11 RetG0. Oe CvtPetton 28 Pe _-AACIV 108 Re. 0879) CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM Local Rake 20 | TLASE Aporoved 00-04 AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION Page 3of 4 : Dock 1 Pager 22 - Doe FD = 1615393583 - Deo Type = OER(age 34 of 2) . e e SHORTT opin Films, Inc. v. Clear Skies Nevada, LLC eee Item Il, Statement of Location: Enter the aderess ofthe accident, party's residence or place of business, performance, or ther cercumstance indicated in item I, Step 3 on Page 1, as the proper reason for fling in the court location you selected. REASON: Chuck he appropriate boxes forthe numbers showin | 40209 Sante Monica BN tinder Column € fr the typeof alin that you hve elected for Ot. 2, 03.04.08, 06. 07.08. De. O10. ee cE Item IV. Declaration of Assignment | deciare uncer pena of pesiury under te las ofthe Stale of Cafocria that te foregoing i tue ‘and correct and that the above-entties mater is properly Med for assignment to the Stanley Mosk ‘courrouse in the Goraral District of the Superior Court of Cakfomia, County of Los Angeles [Code Civ. Proc., § 392 et seq. and Local ule 20, subd. (0), (€) an (6) oa. Nook] ons PLEASE HAVE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS COMPLETED AND READY TO BE FILEDIN ORDER TO PROPERLY ‘COMMENCE YOUR NEW COURT CASE: i 1. Original Complaint or Petition, If fling a Complaint, a completed Summons form for issuance by the Clerk Civ Case Cover Sheet, Judicial Counci form CM-010. ivi Gase Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Lecation form, LACIV 109, LASC Approved 03-04 (Rev. 03/4). Payment in full of the fling fee, unless fees have been waived, 6 Asignes order appointing the Guardian ad Litem, Judicial Councl form C1V-010 ifthe plant or petttoner Is a ingrander 18 years of age willbe required by Court n order to issue a summons. 7. Additional coples of documents to be conformed by the Clerk. Copies ofthe cover sheet and this addendum Aon coe eS iong wilh the summons and complaint, or other initiating pleading in the case, “Aciv 109 Rew 0a) CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM Toca ule 20 “Tase Arproved 02-04 AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION Page 4 of | ‘oot 1 Pagel #4 ~ fos 1D = 2625895618 - Doo Type = OTR