2008 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.

com/naturebiotechnology

0%230%#4)6%

)NSECTRESISTANCETO"TCROPSEVIDENCEVERSUSTHEORY
"RUCE%4ABASHNIK!ARON*'ASSMANN$AVID7#ROWDER9VES#ARRIRE
%VOLUTIONOFINSECTRESISTANCETHREATENSTHECONTINUEDSUCCESS
OFTRANSGENICCROPSPRODUCING"ACILLUSTHURINGIENSIS"T TOXINS
THATKILLPESTS4HEAPPROACHUSEDMOSTWIDELYTODELAYINSECT
RESISTANCETO"TCROPSISTHEREFUGESTRATEGYWHICHREQUIRES
REFUGESOFHOSTPLANTSWITHOUT"TTOXINSNEAR"TCROPSTOPROMOTE
SURVIVALOFSUSCEPTIBLEPESTS(OWEVERLARGE SCALETESTSOFTHE
REFUGESTRATEGYHAVEBEENPROBLEMATIC!NALYSISOFMORETHAN
ADECADEOFGLOBALMONITORINGDATAREVEALSTHATTHEFREQUENCY
OFRESISTANCEALLELESHASINCREASEDSUBSTANTIALLYINSOMEFIELD
POPULATIONSOF(ELICOVERPAZEABUTNOTINFIVEOTHERMAJORPESTS
IN!USTRALIA#HINA3PAINANDTHE5NITED3TATES4HERESISTANCE
OF(ZEATO"TTOXIN#RY!CINTRANSGENICCOTTONHASNOTCAUSED
WIDESPREADCROPFAILURESINPARTBECAUSEOTHERTACTICSAUGMENT
CONTROLOFTHISPEST4HEFIELDOUTCOMESDOCUMENTEDWITH
MONITORINGDATAARECONSISTENTWITHTHETHEORYUNDERLYINGTHE
REFUGESTRATEGYSUGGESTINGTHATREFUGESHAVEHELPEDTODELAY
RESISTANCE

RESISTANCEIFONEORMOREPOPULATIONSWITHAHISTORYOFEXPOSURETOTHE
TOXININTHEFIELDARELESSSUSCEPTIBLETHANCONSPECIFICFIELDPOPULATIONSOR
LABORATORYSTRAINSTHATHAVEHADLESSEXPOSURE$ECREASEDSUSCEPTIBILITY
ISTYPICALLYDEMONSTRATEDASASIGNIFICANTINCREASEINTHETOXINCONCENTRA
TIONKILLING,# OFTHEINSECTSTESTEDORINTHEPERCENTAGEOFINSECTS
SURVIVINGEXPOSURETOAFIXEDAMOUNTOFTOXIN,ABORATORYDOCUMENTA
TIONOFRESISTANCEHOWEVERDOESNOTALWAYSINDICATECONTROLPROBLEMSIN
THEFIELD
)NTHESECTIONSBELOWWEANALYZETHERESULTSOFSTUDIESFROM!USTRALIA
#HINA3PAINANDTHE5NITED3TATESMONITORINGTHERESISTANCETO"TCROPS
INFIELDPOPULATIONSOFSIXMAJORINSECTPESTS(ELICOVERPAARMIGERA(ZEA
(ELIOTHISVIRESCENS/STRINIANUBILALIS0ECTINOPHORAGOSSYPIELLAAND3ESAMIA
NONAGRIOIDES .EXTFOREACHOFTHESESIXPESTSWECOMPARETHEEVIDENCE
FROMMONITORINGSTUDIESTORESULTSFROMCOMPUTERMODELINGOFRESISTANCE
EVOLUTIONTHATISBASEDONTHETHEORYUNDERLYINGTHEREFUGESTRATEGY7E
CONCLUDEWITHADISCUSSIONOFTHEIMPLICATIONSOFOURFINDINGSFORMANAG
INGINSECTRESISTANCETOCURRENTANDFUTURETRANSGENICCROPS

2APIDRESPONSESTOLABORATORYSELECTIONSHOWTHATMANYPESTSNATURALLY
HARBORGENETICVARIATIONINSUSCEPTIBILITYTO"TTOXINSANDTHUSHAVETHE
POTENTIALTOEVOLVERESISTANCETO"TCROPSINTHEFIELDn!LTHOUGHSOME
NEWERVARIETIESOF"TCROPSPRODUCETWO"TTOXINSHTTPWWWEPAGOV
PESTICIDESBIOPESTICIDESPIPSPIP?LISTHTM WEFOCUSHEREONFIRST GENERA
TION"TCROPSTHATTARGETLEPIDOPTERANPESTSANDPRODUCEONLYONE"TTOXIN
COTTONPRODUCING"TTOXIN#RY!CREFERREDTOHEREAFTERAS"TCOTTON AND
CORNPRODUCING"TTOXIN#RY!BREFERREDTOHEREAFTERAS"TCORN "TCOT
TONAND"TCORNHAVEBEENGROWNONMORETHANMILLIONHAWORLDWIDE
GENERATINGONEOFTHELARGESTSELECTIONSFORINSECTRESISTANCEEVERKNOWN
4HETHEORYUNDERLYINGTHEREFUGESTRATEGYnFORDELAYINGINSECTRESISTANCE
ISTHATMOSTOFTHERARERESISTANTPESTSSURVIVINGON"TCROPSWILLMATEWITH
ABUNDANTSUSCEPTIBLEPESTSFROMREFUGESOFHOSTPLANTSWITHOUT"TTOXINS
)FINHERITANCEOFRESISTANCEISRECESSIVETHEHYBRIDOFFSPRINGPRODUCEDBY
SUCHMATINGSWILLBEKILLEDBY"TCROPSMARKEDLYSLOWINGTHEEVOLUTION
OFRESISTANCE2ESULTSFROMMODELSANDSMALL SCALEEXPERIMENTSSUGGEST
THATREFUGESCANDELAYRESISTANCEBUTCOMPARISONSBETWEENOBSERVEDAND
PREDICTEDOUTCOMESINCOMMERCIALAGRICULTUREHAVEBEENLIMITEDn
4HEMAJORPESTSTARGETEDBY"TCROPSHAVEBEENMONITOREDFORTHEEVOLU
TIONOFRESISTANCEWHICHISAHERITABLEDECREASEINAPOPULATIONSSUSCEPTI
BILITYTOATOXIN3USCEPTIBILITYISUSUALLYMEASUREDBYSAMPLINGINSECTS
FROMAFIELDPOPULATIONANDDETERMININGHOWTHEIRPROGENYRESPONDTO
THETOXININLABORATORYBIOASSAYS3UCHBIOASSAYSDOCUMENTFIELD EVOLVED

%VIDENCEFROMRESISTANCEMONITORINGSTUDIES
!NALYSISOFTHEPUBLISHEDMONITORINGDATAFORSIXMAJORLEPIDOPTERANPESTS
TARGETEDBY"TCROPSSHOWSFIELD EVOLVEDRESISTANCEIN(ZEABUTNOTIN
(ARMIGERA(VIRESCENS/NUBILALIS0GOSSYPIELLAOR3NONAGRIOIDES
4ABLEAND&IG %VALUATIONOFTHELARGEDATASETSFROMTWOLANDMARK
STUDIESREVEALSRESISTANCETO#RY!CINSOMEFIELDPOPULATIONSOF(ZEA
FROM!RKANSASAND-ISSISSIPPI&IG BUTNOTINCONCURRENTLYTESTEDPOP
ULATIONSOF(VIRESCENSFROMTHESAMEREGION4ABLE &IELDSAMPLINGOF
BOTHPESTSWASDONEFROMTOINTHEFIRSTSTUDYANDFROMTO
INTHESECONDSTUDYENABLINGCOMPARISONOFEACHPESTSSUSCEPTIBILITY
BEFOREANDAFTERTHECOMMERCIALIZATIONOF"TCOTTON"OTHSTUDIESUSED
BIOASSAYSINVOLVINGTOXININCORPORATEDINTHEDIETTODETERMINETHE,#
OF#RY!CFORSTRAINSDERIVEDFROMFIELDPOPULATIONSANDFORLABORATORY
STRAINSTHATWERENOTEXPOSEDTO"TTOXINS4HESEDATAALLOWCALCULATIONOF
RESISTANCERATIOSWHICHARE,#VALUESOFFIELD DERIVEDSTRAINSDIVIDEDBY
,#VALUESOFCONSPECIFICSUSCEPTIBLELABORATORYSTRAINS2ESISTANCERATIOS
AREMOSTLIKELYTOREFLECTHERITABLEDECREASESINSUSCEPTIBILITY&ORTHE
TWOPESTSPECIESINWHICHRESISTANCETO"TSPRAYSEVOLVEDOUTSIDEOFTHE
LABORATORYTHEINITIALDOCUMENTATIONWASBASEDONRESISTANCERATIOSUPTO
FOR0LUTELLAXYLOSTELLAFROMFIELDPOPULATIONSANDFOR4RICHOPLUSIA
NIFROMGLASSHOUSES
"IOASSAYRESULTSFOR(ZEASAMPLEDDURINGANDIN!RKANSAS
AND-ISSISSIPPISHOWRESISTANCERATIOSFOR#RY!CFORSIXFIELD
DERIVEDSTRAINSINCLUDINGRESISTANCERATIOSFORFOURSTRAINSAND
FORTWO&IGAND3UPPLEMENTARY-ETHODSONLINE $ATAFROM
FIELDPOPULATIONSSAMPLEDINANDALSODEMONSTRATE(ZEA
RESISTANCETO#RY!CYIELDINGRESISTANCERATIOSFORSEVENADDI
TIONALSTRAINSFROM!RKANSASINCLUDINGTWOSTRAINSWITHRESISTANCERATIOS
REF )NCONTRASTFIELDPOPULATIONSOF(ZEASAMPLEDIN

$EPARTMENTOF%NTOMOLOGY5NIVERSITYOF!RIZONA4UCSON!RIZONA

53!#URRENTADDRESS$EPARTMENTOF%NTOMOLOGY)OWA3TATE5NIVERSITY
!MES)OWA53!#ORRESPONDENCESHOULDBEADDRESSEDTO"%4
BRUCET AGARIZONAEDU 
0UBLISHEDONLINE&EBRUARYDOINBT

.!452%")/4%#(./,/'96/,5-%.5-"%2&%"25!29



0%230%#4)6%

" ! "$ 

#$"#



 "$ "%



&IGURE&IELD EVOLVEDRESISTANCEOF(ELICOVERPAZEATO"TCOTTONDEMONSTRATED
BYINCREASESINTHEMEDIANLETHALCONCENTRATION,# OFTHE"TTOXIN
#RY!CFORFIELDPOPULATIONSA "EFORETHECOMMERCIALIZATIONOF"TCOTTON
nREF NOSIGNIFICANTDIFFERENCEIN,#VALUESEXISTED
BETWEENFIELD DERIVEDSTRAINSMEANN ANDLABORATORYSTRAINS
MEANN -ANN 7HITNEY5 TEST50 B !FTER
THECOMMERCIALIZATIONOF"TCOTTONnREF ,#VALUESWERE
SIGNIFICANTLYHIGHERFORFIELD DERIVEDSTRAINSMEANN THANFOR
LABORATORYSTRAINSMEANN 50 !RROWS
SHOWTHESIXFIELD DERIVEDSTRAINSWITH,#&ORTHESESIXSTRAINSTHE
RESISTANCERATIOSFROM4ABLEOFREFWERE&&&
&&&3UPPLEMENTARY-ETHODS 

&







MORETHANFIRST GENERATIONPROGENYOFFIELD COLLECTEDFEMALES

SHOWTHATTHEESTIMATEDFREQUENCYOFMAJORNON RECESSIVERESISTANCEALLELES
REMAINEDLOWDECLININGFROMINTOBELOWDETECTABLELEVELS
INAND

&




%VIDENCEVERSUSTHEORY
4O DETERMINE WHETHER FIELD OUTCOMES ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE THEORY
UNDERLYINGTHEREFUGESTRATEGYWEMODELEDRESISTANCEEVOLUTIONINEACH
OFTHESIXMAJORPESTSLISTEDIN4ABLE7EUSEDTHESAMEBASICPOPULA
TIONGENETICMODELFORALLPESTSINCORPORATINGREALISTICESTIMATESOFTHE
KEYBIOLOGICALPARAMETERSFOREACHSPECIES3UPPLEMENTARY-ETHODSAND
3UPPLEMENTARY4ABLEONLINE &OREACHPESTWEUSEDSENSITIVITYANALYSIS
TOASSESSHOWRESISTANCEEVOLUTIONMIGHTBEAFFECTEDBYVARIATIONINTHE
RELATIVEABUNDANCEOFREFUGESOFNON "THOSTPLANTS
4HEMODELINGRESULTSAREINACCORDWITHTHEPATTERNSDOCUMENTEDBY
MONITORING DATA SUGGESTING THAT THE PRINCIPLES OF THE REFUGE STRATEGY
APPLYINTHEFIELDFORTHISSETOFPESTSAND"TCROPS&IGA #ONSISTENT
WITHTHEMONITORINGDATATHEMODELINGRESULTSINDICATETHAT(ZEAIS
EXPECTEDTOEVOLVERESISTANCEFASTERTHANTHEOTHERPESTS&IGA 7ITH
REALISTIC ESTIMATES OF REFUGE ABUNDANCE INCORPORATED THE MODELING



 







&




&



 


&


 &
 &
& 
 
&





&




 

 

  



&




 &
 &
& 





" ! "$ 

#$"#

2008 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.com/naturebiotechnology




'
"%
!"

$

ANDBEFORECOMMERCIALIZATIONOF"TCOTTONWERENOTRESISTANTTO

#RY!C4ABLEAND&IG 
!LTHOUGHFIELD EVOLVEDRESISTANCETO#RY!COCCURREDINSOME!RKANSAS
AND-ISSISSIPPIPOPULATIONSnYEARSAFTERCOMMERCIALIZATIONOF"TCOT
TON TWO STUDIES SHOW NO DECREASE IN SUSCEPTIBILITY TO #RY!C IN
(ZEAPOPULATIONSFROM.ORTH#AROLINA4ABLE $IETBIOASSAYSTESTING

4ABLE'LOBALMONITORINGOFRESISTANCEOFSIXMAJORPESTSTOTHE"TTOXINSINTRANSGENICCROPS
,OCATION

&IELDSAMPLE

9EARS

0ARAMETER

)NITIAL

&INAL

!USTRALIA

STRAINS

n

MAX22





!USTRALIA

FAMILIES

nTOn

RFREQ





#HINA

STRAINS

n

SURVIVAL





#HINA!NCI

FAMILIES

n

RFREQ





#HINA8IAJIAN

FAMILIES

n

RFREQ





53!

STRAINS

nTOn

MAX22





.#

FAMILIES

n

RFREQ





53!

STRAINS

nTOn

MAX22





,!AND48

MALES

n

RFREQ





53!

FAMILIES

n

RFREQ





3PAIN

STRAINS

n

MAX22





!:

STRAINS

n

RFREQ





!:#!48

INSECTS

n

RFREQ





3PAIN

STRAINS

n

MAX22





3PAIN

FAMILIES

n

RFREQ





(ELICOVERPAARMIGERA

(ELICOVERPAZEA

(ELIOTHISVIRESCENS

/STRINIANUBILALIS

0ECTINOPHORAGOSSYPIELLA

3ESAMIANONAGRIOIDES

$ATAAREFROMBIOASSAYSOF/NUBILALISAND3NONAGRIOIDESVERSUS#RY!B"TCORN OROTHERPESTSVERSUS#RY!C"TCOTTON WITHTWOEXCEPTIONS

'AHANETALAND4ABASHNIKETAL
SCREENED$.!OFFIELD COLLECTEDINSECTSFORCADHERINMUTATIONSCONFERRINGRESISTANCETO#RY!CIN(VIRESCENSAND0GOSSYPIELLARESPECTIVELY@-AX22ISTHEMAXIMUMRESISTANCERATIOTHE
HIGHEST,#AMONGFIELD DERIVEDSTRAINSDIVIDEDBYTHE,#OFONEORMORESUSCEPTIBLELABORATORYSTRAINS@RFREQISTHEESTIMATEDRESISTANCEALLELEFREQUENCY@3URVIVALISDEFINEDASSURVIVAL
TOTHIRDINSTARONDIETWITHG#RY!CPERMLOFDIET!:!RIZONA#!#ALIFORNIA,!,OUISIANA.#.ORTH#AROLINA484EXAS3EE3UPPLEMENTARY-ETHODSFORDETAILS



6/,5-%.5-"%2&%"25!29.!452%")/4%#(./,/'9

0%230%#4)6%

2008 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.com/naturebiotechnology

.!452%")/4%#(./,/'96/,5-%.5-"%2&%"25!29



 



 

RESULTSAREALSOCONSISTENTWITHTHEMONITORING

 




DATA SHOWING THAT FIELD EVOLVED RESISTANCE OF
"



(ZEATO#RY!COCCURREDFASTERIN!RKANSAS



AND-ISSISSIPPITHANIN.ORTH#AROLINA4ABLE
#


 'USTAFSONETALMETICULOUSLYESTIMATEDTHAT
THEEFFECTIVEREFUGEABUNDANCEDURINGEACHOF
 








 





THREEGENERATIONSWHEN(ZEAFEDONCOTTONWAS
IN!RKANSASAND-ISSISSIPPIANDIN


.ORTH#AROLINA7ITHTHESEREFUGESIZES(ZEA
ISPROJECTEDTOEVOLVERESISTANCEAFTERYEARSIN


!RKANSASAND-ISSISSIPPI"YCONTRASTIN.ORTH






















































































































!

#AROLINARESISTANCEEVOLUTIONSHOULDTAKE
!

YEARS WITH THE EXPECTED RESISTANCE ALLELE FRE
&IGURE3IMULATEDEFFECTOFREFUGEABUNDANCE ONPESTRESISTANCETO"TCROPS4HECRITERIONFOR
QUENCYSTILLAFTERYEARS
RESISTANCEWASARESISTANCER ALLELEFREQUENCYA 2ESISTANCEEVOLUTIONINSIXMAJORPESTS
!LTHOUGHTHERESULTSSUGGESTTHATHIGHREF MODELEDWITHREALISTICESTIMATESFORKEYBIOLOGICALPARAMETERS3UPPLEMENTARY4ABLE (A(ELICOVERPA
UGE ABUNDANCE IN .ORTH #AROLINA DELAYED ARMIGERA(Z(ELICOVERPAZEA(V(ELIOTHISVIRESCENS/N/STRINIANUBILALIS0G0ECTINOPHORA
RESISTANCEIN(ZEAANALTERNATIVEHYPOTHESIS GOSSYPIELLA3N3ESAMIANONAGRIOIDES&OR/NWITHAREFUGERESISTANCEEVOLUTIONREQUIREDYEARS
IS THAT INITIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TO #RY!C WAS ANDTHERALLELEFREQUENCYWASAFTERYEARS&OR(VWITHAREFUGERESISTANCEEVOLVEDIN
GREATER IN .ORTH #AROLINA THAN IN!RKANSAS YEARSB %FFECTOFDOMINANCEH ONRESISTANCEEVOLUTIONINAGENERICPEST7ITHHANDAREFUGE
RESISTANCEEVOLUTIONREQUIREDYEARSANDTHERALLELEFREQUENCYINCREASEDFROMTOIN
AND -ISSISSIPPI (OWEVER MONITORING DATA YEARS
FROMANDSHOWTHEOPPOSITEPATTERN
INITIALSUSCEPTIBILITYTO#RY!CWASGREATERIN
-ISSISSIPPITHANIN.ORTH#AROLINA)NADDITIONTHERAPIDRESPONSETO #ONCLUSIONSANDIMPLICATIONS
LABORATORYSELECTIONINASTRAINSTARTEDFROMLARVAECOLLECTEDFROM /URANALYSISSHOWSTHATLABORATORYBIOASSAYSOF(ZEADOCUMENTTHEFIRST
.ORTH#AROLINAINDEMONSTRATESTHEPRESENCEOFGENETICVARIA CASEOFFIELD EVOLVEDRESISTANCETOA"TTOXINPRODUCEDBYATRANSGENIC
TIONFORRESISTANCETO#RY!C3ELECTIONWITH#RY!CINDIETYIELDED CROP!LTHOUGHTESTSOFSURVIVALON"TCOTTONPLANTSFROMNEONATETOADULT
 FOLDRESISTANCEINEIGHTGENERATIONSINTHE.ORTH#AROLINASTRAIN HAVENOTBEENREPORTEDFORFIELD SELECTEDRESISTANTSTRAINSOF(ZEATHE
SIMILARTOTHE FOLDRESISTANCEATTAINEDINSEVENGENERATIONSOFSELEC AVAILABLEEVIDENCESUGGESTSTHATSURVIVALON"TCOTTONINTHEFIELDISHIGHER
TIONINACOMPOSITESTRAINSTARTEDINFROMINSECTSCOLLECTEDIN FORRESISTANTPOPULATIONSTHANFORSUSCEPTIBLEPOPULATIONS3USCEPTIBLE
-ISSISSIPPIAND4EXAS4HESECOMPARABLERESPONSESTOSELECTIONSUGGEST STRAINSOF(ZEASHOWSOMESURVIVALON"TCOTTONWHICHMEANS
THATGENETICVARIATIONFORRESISTANCEWASSIMILARINTHETWOINDEPEN THATANYDECREASEINSUSCEPTIBILITYTO#RY!CCOULDINCREASESURVIVAL
-OREOVERINGREENHOUSEEXPERIMENTSWITH"TCOTTONPLANTSSURVIVAL
DENTLYSELECTEDSTRAINS
!SSEENFOR(ZEAIN.ORTH#AROLINARELATIVELYHIGHREFUGEABUNDANCES WASFORALABORATORY SELECTEDSTRAINWITH FOLDRESISTANCETO
AREASSOCIATEDWITHTHEOBSERVEDLACKOFFIELD EVOLVEDRESISTANCETO#RY!C #RY!CCOMPAREDWITHFORAFERALSTRAIN!LSOINBIOASSAYSWITH
FOR(ARMIGERAIN!USTRALIAAND#HINA0GOSSYPIELLAIN!RIZONAAND3NON "TCOTTONLEAVESAFIELD DERIVEDSTRAINOF(ZEAFROM-ISSISSIPPIWITH
AGRIOIDESIN3PAIN)N!USTRALIA"TCOTTONPRODUCING#RY!CWASLIMITED FOLDRESISTANCETO#RY!CHADSURVIVALVERSUSFORASUSCEPTIBLE
TOOFTOTALCOTTONPLANTEDPROVIDINGAMINIMUMREFUGE)N STRAIN!CCORDINGLY,UTTRELLAND!LISTATETHATTHEIRRESULTSSUGGEST
#HINASMALLFIELDSOF"TCOTTONARECLOSETOFIELDSOFOTHERNON "TCROPS THELOWSUSCEPTIBILITYOFSOMEFIELD DERIVEDSTRAINSWAShHERITABLEvAND
PROVIDINGREFUGESTHATACCOUNTEDFORnOFTHEAVAILABLEHOSTSFOR hASSOCIATEDWITHAMEASURABLEINCREASEINSURVIVALON"TPLANTTISSUEv
(ARMIGERAINEACHPROVINCE)N!RIZONATHEMEANREFUGEABUNDANCE 4HEYALSONOTETHATSTRAINSSTARTEDBYCOLLECTINGLARVAESURVIVINGON"T
WASCLOSETORANGINGFROMTOPERCOUNTY)N3PAINREF COTTONPLANTSINTHEFIELDhTENDEDTOHAVEREDUCEDSUSCEPTIBILITYSUGGEST
UGEABUNDANCEWASABOUT#ONSISTENTWITHTHEMONITORINGDATA INGTHATSOMECOMPONENTOFTHEOBSERVEDFIELDCONTROLPROBLEMSMAY
(VIRESCENSAND/NUBILALISWERENOTPROJECTEDTOEVOLVERESISTANCEIN BEASSOCIATEDWITHTHEPRESENCEOFRESISTANCEGENESv
YEARSEVENWITHTHESMALLESTREFUGEEXAMINED 
.ONETHELESSRESISTANCEOF(ZEATO#RY!CHASNOTCAUSEDWIDESPREAD
3UPPORTINGTHETHEORYUNDERLYINGTHEREFUGESTRATEGYDOMINANTINHERI CONTROLFAILURESFORSEVERALREASONS&IRSTEVENINTHEFEWSTATESWITHDOCU
TANCEOFRESISTANCETO#RY!CAPPEARSTOHAVEHASTENEDTHEEVOLUTIONOF MENTEDRESISTANCEMOSTPOPULATIONSTESTEDWERENOTRESISTANTTO#RY!C
RESISTANCEIN(ZEA4HEHYBRIDPROGENYPRODUCEDBYMATINGSBETWEEN &IG 3ECONDINSECTICIDESHAVEBEENUSEDFROMTHEOUTSETTOAUGMENT
ALABORATORY SELECTEDRESISTANTSTRAINANDASUSCEPTIBLESTRAINOF(ZEA CONTROLOF(ZEAON"TCOTTONBECAUSE#RY!CALONEISNOTSUFFICIENT
WERE RESISTANT TO #RY!C YIELDING A DOMINANCE VALUE H OF  TO CONTROL HIGH DENSITY POPULATIONS OF THE PEST )NSECTICIDE SPRAYS
3UPPLEMENTARY4ABLE WHEREINDICATESCOMPLETELYRECESSIVEAND DECREASEANYPROBLEMSASSOCIATEDWITHREDUCEDCONTROLOF(ZEABY"T
COMPLETELYDOMINANTINHERITANCE/FTHEFIVEOTHERMAJORPESTSEXAMINED COTTON4HIRDAGAINSTSTRAINSWITH TO FOLDRESISTANCETO#RY!C
HERE(ARMIGERAISTHEONLYONEWITHLABORATORY SELECTEDRESISTANCETO"T THE#RY!CIN"TCOTTONSTILLCAUSEDnLARVALMORTALITY&INALLY
CROPPLANTSTHATISNOTCOMPLETELYRECESSIVEH3UPPLEMENTARY @PYRAMIDEDTRANSGENICCOTTONPRODUCING"TTOXINS#RY!BAND#RY!C
WASREGISTEREDIN$ECEMBERANDPLANTEDONMORETHANMILLION
4ABLE 
#ONSISTENTWITHTHEMONITORINGDATAMODELINGRESULTSFORAGENERIC HAINTHE5NITED3TATESINANDREF #ONTROLOF#RY!C
PESTOF"TCROPSSHOWTHATWHILEALLOTHERFACTORSAREHELDCONSTANTTHE RESISTANT(ZEABY#RY!BALSOLIMITSPROBLEMSASSOCIATEDWITHRESISTANCE
DOMINANCEOFRESISTANCEH ANDTHEREFUGEABUNDANCEGREATLYAFFECTTHE TO#RY!C
RATEOFRESISTANCEEVOLUTION&IGB 7ITHCOMPLETELYRECESSIVEINHERI
.EGATIVEEFFECTSOF(ZEARESISTANCETO#RY!CSHOULDFURTHERDIMINISH
TANCEOFRESISTANCETO"TCROPSH REFUGESOFrAREEXPECTEDTO ASUSEOFCOTTONTHATPRODUCESONLY#RY!CDECREASESANDUSEOFTWO TOXIN
DELAYRESISTANCEYEARSINTHEGENERICPEST/NTHEOTHERHANDWITHH COTTONWITH#RY!BAND#RY!CINCREASES)NTHE53THEAREAPLANTED
TOCOTTONPRODUCINGONLY#RY!CDECLINEDFROMMILLIONHAIN
rREFUGESOFARENEEDEDFORDELAYSOFYEARS



 2008 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.com/naturebiotechnology

0%230%#4)6%
TOMILLIONHAINREF !LSO-ONSANTOS53REGISTRATIONOF
#RY!CCOTTONISSCHEDULEDTOEXPIREIN3EPTEMBERHTTPWWWEPA
GOVOPPBPPDBIOPESTICIDESPIPSPIP?LISTHTM &OR(VIRESCENSWHICH
HASREMAINEDSUSCEPTIBLETO#RY!CANDISALSOSUSCEPTIBLETO#RY!B
COTTONPRODUCINGBOTHOFTHESETOXINSMAYGREATLYDELAYRESISTANCE&OR
#RY!C RESISTANTPOPULATIONSOF(ZEAHOWEVERTHETWO TOXINCOTTON
MAYACTLIKESINGLE TOXINCOTTONWITHCONTROLEXERTEDPRIMARILYBY#RY!B
)FSOTHEPOTENTIALBENEFITSOFPYRAMIDINGTHESETWOTOXINSFORDELAYING
RESISTANCEWILLNOTBEFULLYREALIZED)N-AY3YNGENTAAPPLIEDFOR
53REGISTRATIONOFTRANSGENICCOTTONWITHTHEPYRAMIDOFTHE"TTOXINS
6IP!AAND#RY!BHTTPWWWEPAGOVFEDRGSTR%0! 0%34-AY
$AY PHTM WHICHWOULDPROVIDEANOTHEROPTIONFORCONTROLLING
KEYLEPIDOPTERANPESTSINCLUDING(ZEAAND(VIRESCENS-OREGENERALLY
OPTIONSFORPESTCONTROLWITHTRANSGENICCROPSHAVEBEENBROADENEDBY
THEDEVELOPMENTOFCORNWITH"TTOXINSTHATKILLCORNROOTWORMSANDMAY
BEFURTHEREXPANDEDBYGENE SILENCINGTECHNOLOGYANDMODIFIED"TTOXINS
DESIGNEDTOKILLRESISTANTPESTSn
4HESUSTAINEDEFFICACYOFTHEFIRSTGENERATIONOF"TCROPSFORADECADE
AGAINSTNEARLYALLTARGETEDPESTPOPULATIONSHASEXCEEDEDTHEEXPECTATIONS
OFMANY4HEEXCEPTIONALCASE(ZEARESISTANCETO"TCOTTONPRODUC
ING#RY!CISCONSISTENTWITHTHETHEORYUNDERLYINGTHEREFUGESTRATEGY
BECAUSETHISRESISTANCEISNOTRECESSIVE)NOTHERWORDSTHECONCENTRATION
OF#RY!CIN"TCOTTONISNOTHIGHENOUGHTOKILLTHEHYBRIDOFFSPRING
PRODUCEDBYMATINGSBETWEENSUSCEPTIBLEANDRESISTANT(ZEA4HUSTHE
SO CALLED@HIGHDOSEREQUIREMENTISNOTMET!STHESECONDDECADEOF
TRANSGENICCROPUSEBEGINSKNOWLEDGEGAINEDFROMSYSTEMATICANALYSES
OFMONITORINGDATAFROMTHEFIRSTDECADECANHELPTOMINIMIZETHERISKS
ANDMAXIMIZETHEBENEFITS4HERESULTSSUMMARIZEDHERESUGGESTTHATTHE
REFUGESTRATEGYCANDELAYRESISTANCETO"TCROPSESPECIALLYWHENRESISTANCE
ISRECESSIVEANDREFUGESAREABUNDANT
.OTE3UPPLEMENTARYINFORMATIONISAVAILABLEONTHE.ATURE"IOTECHNOLOGYWEBSITE
!#+./7,%$'-%.43
7EAREESPECIALLYGRATEFULTO2,UTTRELL!-ATHIAS7-OAR$/NSTAD-3ISTERSON
AND+7UFORCOMMENTSANDSUGGESTIONS4HISWORKWASSUPPORTEDBYTHE.ATIONAL
2ESEARCH)NITIATIVETHE#OOPERATIVE3TATE2ESEARCH%DUCATIONAND%XTENSION3ERVICE
AND5NITED3TATES$EPARTMENTOF!GRICULTUREGRANT  
#/-0%4).'&).!.#)!,).4%2%343
4HEAUTHORSDECLARECOMPETINGFINANCIALINTERESTSDETAILSACCOMPANYTHEFULL TEXT
(4-,VERSIONOFTHEPAPERATHTTPWWWNATURECOMNATUREBIOTECHNOLOGY
0UBLISHEDONLINEATHTTPWWWNATURECOMNATUREBIOTECHNOLOGY
2EPRINTSANDPERMISSIONSINFORMATIONISAVAILABLEONLINEATHTTPNPGNATURECOM
REPRINTSANDPERMISSIONS
 'OULD&3USTAINABILITYOFTRANSGENICINSECTICIDALCULTIVARSINTEGRATINGPESTGENETICS
ANDECOLOGY!NNU2EV%NTOMOLn 
 53%NVIRONMENTAL0ROTECTION!GENCY4HE%NVIRONMENTAL0ROTECTION!GENCYS7HITE
0APERON"T0LANT 0ESTICIDE2ESISTANCE-ANAGEMENT%0!0UBLICATION 3 n
%NVIRONMENTAL0ROTECTION!GENCY7ASHINGTON$#53! WWWEPAGOV%0!
0%34*ANUARY$AY PAPERPDF
 4ABASHNIK"%%VOLUTIONOFRESISTANCETO"ACILLUSTHURINGIENSIS!NNU2EV%NTOMOL
n 
 4ABASHNIK"%ETAL)NSECTRESISTANCETOTRANSGENIC"TCROPSLESSONSFROMTHELABORA
TORYANDFIELD*%CON%NTOMOLn 
 *AMES#'LOBALSTATUSOFCOMMERCIALIZEDBIOTECH'-CROPS)3!!!"RIEFS
n 
 .ATIONAL 2ESEARCH #OUNCIL 0ESTICIDE 2ESISTANCE 3TRATEGIES AND 4ACTICS FOR
-ANAGEMENT.ATIONAL!CADEMY0RESS7ASHINGTON$#53! 
 ,UTTRELL2'7AN,+NIGHTEN+6ARIATIONINSUSCEPTIBILITYOF.OCTUID,EPIDOPTERA
LARVAEATTACKINGCOTTONANDSOYBEANTOPURIFIEDENDOTOXINPROTEINSANDCOMMERCIAL
FORMULATIONSOF"ACILLUSTHURINGIENSIS*%CON%NTOMOLn 
 !LI -) ,UTTRELL 2'  9OUNG 39 ))) 3USCEPTIBILITIES OF (ELICOVERPA ZEA AND
(ELIOTHISVIRESCENS,EPIDOPTERA.OCTUIDAE POPULATIONSTO#RY!CINSECTICIDALPRO
TEIN*%CON%NTOMOLn 
 *ANMAAT!&-YERS*(2APIDEVOLUTIONANDTHECOSTOFRESISTANCETO"ACILLUS
THURINGIENSISINGREENHOUSEPOPULATIONSOFCABBAGELOOPERS4RICHOPLUSIANI0ROC2



3OC,OND"n 
,UTTRELL2'!LI-)%XPLORINGSELECTIONFOR"TRESISTANCEIN(ELIOTHINESRESULTSOF
LABORATORYANDFIELDSTUDIESIN0ROCEEDINGSOFTHE"ELTWIDE#OTTON#ONFERENCES
.EW/RLEANS,OUISIANA*ANUARYnn.ATIONAL#OTTON#OUNCIL
OF!MERICA-EMPHIS4ENNESSEE53! 
"URD !$ 'OULD & "RADLEY *2 6AN $UYN *7  -OAR 7* %STIMATED FRE
QUENCYOFNONRECESSIVE"TRESISTANCEGENESINBOLLWORM(ELICOVERPAZEA"ODDIE
,EPIDOPTERA.OCTUIDAE INEASTERN.ORTH#AROLINA*%CON%NTOMOLn
 
*ACKSON2%'OULD&"RADLEY*2*R6AN$UYN*7'ENETICVARIATIONFOR
RESISTANCETO"ACILLUSTHURINGIENSISIN(ELICOVERPAZEA,EPIDOPTERA.OCTUIDAE FROM
EASTERN.ORTH#AROLINA*%CON%NTOMOLn 
'USTAFSON$)(EAD'0#APRIO-!-ODELINGTHEIMPACTOFALTERNATIVEHOSTS
ON(ELICOVERPAZEAADAPTATIONTO"OLLGARDCOTTON*%CON%NTOMOLn
 
"URD!$"RADLEY*2*R6AN$UYN*7'OULD&2ESISTANCEOFBOLLWORM
(ELICOVERPA ZEA TO #RY)!C TOXIN IN 0ROCEEDINGS OF THE  "ELTWIDE #OTTON
#ONFERENCES3AN!NTONIO4EXAS*ANUARYnEDS$UGGER#02ICHTER
$! 6OLn.ATIONAL#OTTON#OUNCILOF!MERICA-EMPHIS4ENNESSEE
53! 
$OWNES3-AHON2/LSEN+-ONITORINGANDADAPTIVERESISTANCEMANAGEMENT
IN!USTRALIAFOR"T COTTONCURRENTSTATUSANDFUTURECHALLENGES*)NVERTEBR0ATHOL
n 
7U+-ONITORINGANDMANAGEMENTSTRATEGYOF(ELICOVERPAARMIGERARESISTANCETO"T
COTTONIN#HINA*)NVERTEBR0ATHOLn 
#ARRIRE9ETAL,ONG TERMEVALUATIONOFCOMPLIANCEWITHREFUGEREQUIREMENTSFOR"T
COTTON0EST-ANAG3CIn 
&ARINS '0 DE LA 0OZA - (ERNNDEZ #RESPO 0 /RTEGO &  #ASTAERA 0
2ESISTANCEMONITORINGOFFIELDPOPULATIONSOFTHECORNBORERS3ESAMIANONAGRIOIDES
AND/STRINIANUBILALISAFTERYEARSOF"TMAIZECULTIVATIONIN3PAIN%NTOMOL%XP
!PPLn 
*ACKSON2%"RADLEY*2*R6AN$UYN*70ERFORMANCEOFFERALAND#RY!C
SELECTED (ELICOVERPA ZEA ,EPIDOPTERA .OCTUIDAE STRAINS ON TRANSGENIC COTTONS
EXPRESSINGEITHERONEORTWO"ACILLUSTHURINGIENSISSSPKURSTAKIPROTEINSUNDERGREEN
HOUSECONDITIONS*%NTOMOL3CIn 
*ACKSON2%"RADLEY*2*R6AN$UYN*7'OULD&#OMPARATIVEPRODUCTION
OF(ELICOVERPAZEA,EPIDOPTERA.OCTUIDAE FROMTRANSGENICCOTTONEXPRESSINGEITHER
ONEORTWO"ACILLUSTHURINGIENSISPROTEINSWITHORWITHOUTINSECTICIDEOVERSPRAYS*
%CON%NTOMOLn 
,UTTRELL2'ETAL2ESISTANCETO"TIN!RKANSASPOPULATIONSOFCOTTONBOLLWORMIN
0ROCEEDINGSOFTHE"ELTWIDE#OTTON#ONFERENCES3AN!NTONIO4EXAS*ANUARY
n  ED 2ICHTER $! n .ATIONAL #OTTON #OUNCIL OF !MERICA
-EMPHIS4ENNESSEE53! 
-ONSANTO #O -ONSANTO BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAIT ACREAGE &ISCAL YEARS  TO 
-ONSANTO3T,OUISUPDATED/CTOBER HTTPWWWMONSANTOCOMINVESTORS
PRESENTATIONSASPSCROLLDOWNTO"IOTECH!CRESUNDER&OURTH 1UARTER-ONSANTO
#OMPANY%ARNINGS#ONFERENCE#ALL 
:HAO* :ETAL#ONCURRENTUSEOFTRANSGENICPLANTSEXPRESSINGASINGLEANDTWO
"ACILLUSTHURINGIENSISGENESSPEEDSINSECTADAPTATIONTOPYRAMIDEDPLANTS0ROC.ATL
!CAD3CI53!n 
3IEGFRIED"$6AUGHN443PENCER4"ASELINESUSCEPTIBILITYOFWESTERNCORN
ROOTWORM#OLEOPTERA#RYSOMELIDAE TO#RY"B"ACILLUSTHURINGIENSISTOXIN*%CON
%NTOMOLn 
"AUM*!ETAL#ONTROLOFCOLEOPTERANINSECTPESTSTHROUGH2.!INTERFERENCE.AT
"IOTECHNOLn 
-AO9 "ETAL3ILENCINGACOTTONBOLLWORM0MONOOXYGENASEGENEBYPLANT
MEDIATED2.!IIMPAIRSLARVALTOLERANCEOFGOSSYPOL.AT"IOTECHNOLn
 
3OBERN-ETAL%NGINEERINGMODIFIED"TTOXINSTOCOUNTERINSECTRESISTANCE3CIENCE
n 
4ABASHNIK"%$ENNEHY4*#ARRIRE9$ELAYEDRESISTANCETOTRANSGENICCOTTON
INPINKBOLLWORM0ROC.ATL!CAD3CI53!n 
"IRD,*!KHURST2*6ARIATIONINSUSCEPTIBILITYOF(ELICOVERPAARMIGERA(BNER
AND(ELICOVERPAPUNCTIGERA7ALLENGREN ,EPIDOPTERA.OCTUIDAE IN!USTRALIATOTWO
"ACILLUSTHURINGIENSISTOXINS*)NVERTEBR0ATHOLn 
7U+'UO9(EAD'2ESISTANCEMONITORINGOF(ELICOVERPAARMIGERA,EPIDOPTERA
.OCTUIDAE TO"TINSECTICIDALPROTEINDURINGnIN#HINA*%CON%NTOMOL
n 
,I' 0ETAL)NCREASINGTOLERANCETO#RY!CCOTTONFROMCOTTONBOLLWORM(ELICOVERPA
ARMIGERA WAS CONFIRMED IN "T COTTON FARMING AREA OF #HINA %COL %NTOMOL 
n 
'AHAN,*'OULD&,PEZ*$-ICINSKI3(ECKEL$'!POLYMERASECHAIN
REACTIONSCREENOFFIELDPOPULATIONSOF(ELIOTHISVIRESCENSFORARETROTRANSPOSONINSER
TION CONFERRING RESISTANCE TO "ACILLUS THURINGIENSIS TOXIN * %CON %NTOMOL 
n 
3TODOLA4*ETAL&REQUENCYOFRESISTANCETO"ACILLUSTHURINGIENSISTOXIN#RY!BIN
SOUTHERN5NITED3TATESCORNBELTPOPULATIONSOF%UROPEANCORNBORER,EPIDOPTERA
#RAMBIDAE *%CON%NTOMOLn 
4ABASHNIK"%ETAL$.!SCREENINGREVEALSPINKBOLLWORMRESISTANCETO"TCOTTON
REMAINSRAREAFTERADECADEOFEXPOSURE*%CON%NTOMOLn 
!NDREADIS33ETAL&REQUENCYOFRESISTANCETO"ACILLUSTHURINGIENSISTOXIN#RY!B
IN'REEKAND3PANISHPOPULATIONOF3ESAMIANONAGRIOIDES,EPIDOPTERA.OCTUIDAE 
*%CON%NTOMOLn 

6/,5-%.5-"%2&%"25!29.!452%")/4%#(./,/'9