Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Assignments
Introduction
Background
1. Introduction
1.1 Terms of
Reference
1.2 Aims
1.3 Overview
2. Method
3. Findings
1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Findings
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Quality
3.3 Quantity
3.4 Cost
1. Introd
2. Metho
3. Findin
3.1 Intr
3.2 Ob
3.3 Qu
results
Method
Findings
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Strengths
4.3 Weaknesses
4.4 Opportunities
4.5 Threats
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Advantages
3.3 Disadvantages
4. Conclusion
5. Recommendations
3.5 Risk
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
6.
Recommendations
Conclusion
Recommendations
Introduction section
3.4 Inte
Results
4. Discu
5. Concl
6. Recom
Findings
Conclusion
Solution: At the start of the Conclusion write a oneparagraph summary of the Findings; e.g. In
conclusion, the findings show that staff are not
satisfied with the ...'.
Recommendations
Causes:
Over-general recommendations
Example:
'In future, our company should adopt more effective
measures to market more useful products to more
potential customers.' (Too general).
Findings
Solution: see
http://elc.polyu.edu.hk/CILL/eiw/satisfaction.htm
Solution: see
http://elc.polyu.edu.hk/CILL/exercises/staff.htm
Solution: see
http://elc.polyu.edu.hk/cill/eiw/approximationcorre
ction.htm
Solution see
http://elc.polyu.edu.hk/cill/exercises/trends.htm
Conclusion
Solution: see
http://elc.polyu.edu.hk/CILL/exercises/cause&effec
t.htm
Solution: see
http://elc.polyu.edu.hk/cill/exercises/lack.htm
Solution: see
http://elc.polyu.edu.hk/cill/exercises/because.htm
Solution: see
http://elc.polyu.edu.hk/cill/exercises/itisbecause.ht
m
Recommendations
All sections
Conventions
Example report
CONTACT COMPUTER GRAPHICS
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
1. Introduction
At the monthly staff meeting on Tuesday, 2 September 2014, you requested inform
2. Background
Since the move to the new office in Kowloon Bay, staff have had difficulty in findi
3. Method
Sixty staff were surveyed by questionnaire from Friday, 5 September 2014 to Wedn
4. Findings
4.1 Introduction
In general, staff were not satisfied with the power and size of the microwav
Table 1: Staff Satisfaction with the Microwave Oven
Staff Satisfaction
Feature
Group A
Usually ate in the
office (n=40)
Group B
Usually ate outside
the office (n=20)
Size
55%
35%
Power
30%
25%
Location
70%
75%
Reliability
95%
95%
Cleanliness
90%
95%
Average
68%
65.5%
4.2 Power
Only a quarter of Group B staff said that the oven was powerful enough for
4.3 Size
In addition, about two-thirds of Group B staff said that the microwave was
4.4 Location
About three-quarters of both groups of staff thought that the location of the
5. Conclusions
The Findings show that staff, especially staff in Group B, were not satisfied with th
6. Recommendations
There are a number of options we could consider, as follows:
6.1 Exchange
We should return the microwave to the shop and ask them if we can buy a b