Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Introduction
Graduate Tracer Study constitutes an important tool for educational planners, as
they can provide valuable information for evaluating the productivity of higher education
and training institutions. It is an effort to survey the performance of graduates in the job
market upon completion of their chosen field of interest. Graduate Tracer Studies are
increasing and are conducted by schools, universities and higher education institutions
all over the world. In a progressive world today, surveys are also given to graduates
online by giving the Uniform Resource Locator (URL) of the document through online
communication such electronic mails, blogs, articles and other electronic means. It is
performed online in order to attain smoother data gathering instead of conducting
surveys personally. In the Philippines, Graduate Tracer Studies are initiated by the
Commission of Higher Education (CHED) and followed by different colleges and
universities. Locally, there are few schools and universities conducting it, but is growing,
and more are adapting to it in order to improve their affectivity in producing employable
graduates.
The study aims to track the graduates of Industrial Engineering in Lyceum of the
Philippines-Laguna as a way of gauging their capability of securing employment. It is
also a means of determining the graduates satisfaction level during their stay in the
university and a means of obtaining basic information on the status of graduates upon
graduation, and finally, a means in investigating the employability of graduates in the job
market.
Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna is calling on all graduates of Industrial
Engineering from 2010 to 2012 to participate in the study. It is an institution of higher
learning dedicated to the development of integral individual. It is the institutions vision
to produce graduates who are well-equipped with necessary skills, knowledge and
attitudes. The tracer study wants to know the satisfaction level of the graduates in terms
of curriculum, career guidance, quality of lecturers, and facilities of the institution. It also
seeks to determine the Industrial Engineering graduates ability in getting a job, their
waiting time before getting the job, and their job satisfaction level. The output of study
will help the university management in planning and determining factors related to the
improvement of curriculum and services.
5.
Conceptual Framework
Assessment of Program
Employment status
Assessment of Learning
Position
Gender
Figure 1. Conceptual
Framework
Definition of Terms
Assessment of Program. An evaluation of the program the university
provides.
Assessment of Learning. An evaluation of the learning the graduates
acquired on their stay in the university.
Career Guidance. A guide in the path of careers provided by the course.
10
11
Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
Tracer studies when defined, provides specific and dynamic information needed
by the education institution and its sponsors, its students, and its programs offered. Its
purpose is to serve as reliable information for educational institution development. This
has been the main objective of graduate tracer surveys as time progresses (Schomburg
2003).
Tracer studies are the appropriate observational studies for evaluating the results
of the education provided and the learning developed by its students. It converges
different types basic of information regarding the status of employment and position
among
the
graduates,
up-to-date
experience
of
undergraduates,
and
the
12
graduates that had balanced or less difference in years of work and education
experience to attain effective feedback from the graduates. Zainab et al (2004)
explained in their research that the outcome of the research may be affected for
reasons such as those who have changed addresses, changed jobs or gone overseas
may make it difficult in tracing the graduates. Furthermore, they said that a number of
those located or reached were not willing to participate.
Related Studies
In the study of Mercado (2010), the communication skill was the most useful to
graduates first job which was said by 80.98% of the respondents. This skill was closely
followed by human relation skills (70.72%), followed by information technology skills
(52.23%), and the entrepreneurship (25.47%), which was least useful to the graduates
first job.
In the study of Chavez & Dotong (2011), majority of the employed respondents
have stayed in their first job for almost more than one year, consisting of 30 or 52.6
percent of the total employed respondents and 23 or 40.4 percent have stayed in the
industry for one year. In the 23 respondents, 4 or 7 percent of them stayed for 6 months
in the company. In the same study, the relevance of Industrial Engineering curriculum to
present employment obtained a weighted mean of 2.68 to 3.86 with a verbal
13
interpretation that ranges from Relevant to Very Relevant, which obtained a composite
mean of 3.33 with a verbal interpretation of Relevant.
In the study Edralin (2007), she revealed in her study that the factors of
employability of graduates are the "quality education" provided by the institution and the
good image or name of the institution, pertains to the positive reputation that
employers have attached to the school.
In the study of Dotong & Laguador (2011), Diligence and Hard Work was the
most significant factor that contributes to the job placement of the respondents which
obtained a weighted mean of 4.82 with a descriptive rating of Very much relevant.
They noted that the top five responses of their study came from work related values.
They concluded that the attitude of the respondents with regards to their work was the
most significant factor that should not be neglected by the instructors, while the students
are still in the learning.
In the study of Baes & Magnaye (2011), it revealed that there is no significant
relationship between the biographical characteristics of the graduate, which are the civil
status, gender, age, region of origin, province of origin, and location of residence, and
the employment situation of the respondents such as present employment status,
present occupation, first job, relatedness of first job to college course, duration in first
14
job, waiting time before landing on first job, job level position, initial gross monthly
earning in first job, and relevance of college curriculum to first job.
In the study of Cosser (2003), the study reveals that the majority of the surveyed
employers are satisfied with the balanced learning between theory and practice in
college courses (64%), the relevance of the course content to the industry/business
needs (78%), and the competency of college teaching staff (73%).
In the study of Wylie (2003) in Cortado 2010, the study reveals that graduates
naturally express open-mindedness and determination to continuously learn, and seek
for new ideas. The study also added that graduates have this eagerness to prove
themselves, which could encourage everyone in the organization to be at their best.
The study of Wylie assumed that the skills needed by job applicants including recent
college graduates, depend from every position. It also added that technical skills are
skills that should be extremely considered. However, the most important skill was the
interpersonal skills, followed by communication skills, when recruiting graduates.
15
Baes & Magnaye (2011) reported a low response rate of 10.94 percent. Similar to our
study, the study of Ocholla & Shongwe (n.d.), reported a response rate of 40.00
percent.
and Valdez (2011),a response rate of 45.00 percent. Meanwhile, the study of Pring &
Romales (2011) reported a response rate of 56.77 percent, which is above 50 percent
response rate. Finally, the study of Debono, et al. (2004) and Bolaane, et al. (2010)
reported a response rate of 55.65%, 49% and 45% for the graduates of the years 2000,
2002, and 2004 respectively.
Synthesis
Graduate Tracer Studies are surveys provided by the higher education
institutions. It is an appropriate means of evaluating the results of the education and
training provided at a given institution. The study calls for graduates as the participants
of the study. The answers provide work-related experience of the graduates and their
assessment between work and studies. The graduate tracer study should be carried out
at least one year after the students have graduated. It should also be not too long in
order to achieve an efficient comparison between work and studies. It should be noted
that not all the involved graduates may be able to participate for reasons such as
changed address and personal information, and personally not willing to participate.
Study shows that majority of the employed graduates have stayed in their first job
for more than 1 year. Meanwhile, In terms of skill, the most significant for any graduate
16
education to students and have good reputation, for them to provide employable
graduates. A study revealed that biographical characteristics are not significant to the
employment situation of the graduates. Meanwhile, the Industrial Engineering
curriculum was described as relevant to the graduates' present employment. Lastly, the
graduate tracer studies should be noted that its response rate is varying which could
either result to a low, average, or high response rate.
17
Chapter 3
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
The researchers used descriptive research in the study because it involved
collections of quantitative information that can be tabulated in numerical form. This
method gathered information about the present condition of the Industrial Engineering
graduates of Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna that used visual aids such as graphs
and charts to aid the reader in understanding the data distribution.
The Subject
The researchers selected all the graduates of Industrial Engineering of Lyceum of
the Philippines-Laguna of batch 2010-2012 as the respondents of the study. It consists
of 26-26-21 graduates from batch 2010 to 2012 gathering a total of 73 respondents for
the study.
Percent Retrieval of Data
The researchers only used the survey answers that ran from the survey period
provided by the researchers. This was due to the limited time availability of the
researchers, and the unexpected slow retrieval of survey answers from the respondents
for two months. Percent retrieval of data is described as the ratio of actual number of
respondents that answered from the given survey period (May 23, 2013 to July 23,
18
2013) and the total number of respondents for the study. Data is displayed in percent
(%).
Research Instrument
The researchers used a questionnaire as an instrument of the study. It is done by
the current research director of Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna, Dr. Merlita Medallon.
The study has been decided to be an online survey questionnaire through Google Docs,
a Google application. The particular kind of survey wherein the respondents will answer
the questionnaire only once, therefore, the collected data will be used in the whole
process of the research. The questions were divided into 3 parts. The first part was
about assessment of program which tackles about the relevancy, program description
and the quality of instruction. The second part was about assessment of learning which
includes improvements and developments of students skills and capabilities. And lastly
the third part was about employment and work. It involves the capability of the
graduates in securing employment after graduation. The researchers have used the
19
Internet and books (electronic books) as references to acquire more information about
Graduate Tracer Study.
Validation of Instrument
The questionnaire according to Dr. Merlita Medallon was validated and pretested because the questionnaire being used by the researchers was patterned in the
questionnaire of the Comission on Higher Education (CHED). Dr. Medallon gave us the
permission to use it for the study. Since the graduates may have changed their
addresses, contact numbers and may have their jobs already, the researchers decided
to use an online survey for an easy access of information from the graduates. Each item
in the questionnaire will have options. 5 strongly agree; 4 moderately agree; 3 agree; 2
disagree; strongly disagree.
Data-Gathering Procedure
Having found the questionnaire valid and reliable, the researchers provided a
request letter to the registrar for the list of names of the Industrial Engineering
graduates of Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna for the batch 2010 to 2012. List of
graduates, however, were not provided by the office of the registrar due to
confidentiality purposes, but the request was forwarded to the Palaestra Consortio
Office. The Palaestra Consortio approved the request and released the list of graduates,
which also includes their addresses, contact numbers and e-mail addresses,
as the registrar permitted the request for research purposes only. Before sending the
questionnaires to the respondents, the researchers asked for the permission of Dr.
20
Merlita Medallon, the person who made the questionnaire and is currently the research
director of Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna.
The researchers used the online questionnaire from a Google application,
Google Docs. The online questionnaire were sent to the graduates by sending it to their
e-mails that was indicated in the list of graduates provided by the Palaestra Consortio
Office. The researchers will get and analyze the tabulated data presented in the
summary of the Google Docs.
Data-Processing Method
The data that will be gathered by the online survey will be used for the data
analysis as a way of answering the concerns and problem of the study. The online
instrument called Google Docs will tabulate the data automatically once the
respondents have answered the questionnaire provided by the researchers. The data
that have been tabulated will be analyzed by the statistician, Dr. Merlita Medallon
through a program named Statistical Package for Social Science version 19. It will
help in providing a summary of demographic profile of the respondents, evaluation on
assessment of the program, learning and employment & work of the graduates,
determining the status of employment and position of the graduates, determining the
significant relationship between the assessment of the program and status of
employment and the current position, determining the significant relationship between
the assessment of learning and status of employment and current position, determining
the significant difference in the status of employment between male and female.
21
4.50-5.00
3.50-4.49
2.50-3.49
1.50-2.49
1.00-1.49
22
Where:
N = number of pairs of scores
xy = sum of the products of paired scores
x = sum of x scores
y = sum of y scores
x2 = sum of squared x scores
y2 = sum of squared y scores
The Pearson correlation coefficient, r, can take a range of values from +1 to -1. A
value of 0 indicates that there is no association between the two variables. A value
greater than 0 indicates a positive association; that is, as the value of one variable
increases, so does the value of the other variable. A value less than 0 indicates a
negative association; that is, as the value of one variable increases, the value of the
other variable decreases.
23
Where:
xx= mean
s = standard deviation
n = number of data
24
Chapter 4
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter contains the results of the survey that ran from May 23, 2013 to July
23, 2013. The results will be analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science
version 19 and statistical instruments namely weighted mean, frequency tables, t- test
and Pearson correlation for the interpretation of the data.
Demographic Profile of the Respondents
1. Gender
Table 2. Gender of the Respondents
Gender
Frequency
Percent
Male
15
50.00%
Female
15
50.00%
Total
30
100.00%
The researchers have gathered 30 survey answers, consisting of 15 male and female
respondents.
25
2. Monthly Income
Table 3. Monthly Income of the Respondents
Monthly Income Range
Frequency
Percent
5,000 to less than 10,000
1
3.33%
10,000 to less than 15,000
25
83.33%
15,000 to less than 20,000
4
13.33%
Total
30
100.00%
Table 3 shows the profile of the respondents based on initial gross monthly
income in their first job. 83.33 percent of the respondents have a monthly income range
of 10.000 to 15,000, followed by 13.33 percent having 15,000 to less than 20,000,
and 3.33 percent have 5,000 to less than 10,000. From the gathered results, majority
of the respondents have an initial gross monthly income of 10,000 to less than
20,000 in their first job.
3. Length of Service
Table 4. Length of Service of the Respondents in their First Job
Length of Service
Frequency
1 to 6 months
6
7 to 12 months
2
1 year to less than 2 years
11
2 years to less than 3 years
5
3 to less than 4 years
3
No response
3
Total
30
Percent
20.00%
6.67%
36.67%
16.67%
10.00%
10.00%
100.00%
26
Table 4 shows that 36.67 percent have stayed in their first job for one year to
less than two years, 20 percent stayed for one to six months, 16.67 percent stayed for
two years to less than three years, 10 percent have stayed for three to less than four
years, and 6.67 percent have stayed for seven to 12 months. The remaining 10 percent
have not responded to this question. From the gathered results, most of the
respondents have stayed in their first job for one year to less than two years.
Assessment of the Program
The course content is very comprehensive and relevant to the job.
Table 5. The Course Content is Very Comprehensive and Relevant to the Job
Response
Frequency
Score
Percent
0.00%
Disagree (2)
3.33%
Agree (3)
24
26.67%
13
52
43.33%
40
26.67%
Total
30
118
100.00%
3.93
27
Figure 2. The Course Content is Very Comprehensive and Relevant to the Job
Table 5 shows that 43.33 percent of the respondents "Moderately Agree" that the
content is very comprehensive and relevant to the job, while 26.67 percent Agree and
another 26.67 percent "Strongly Agree, and 3.33 percent "Disagree. Based on the
results, most of the respondents either moderately agree/agree that the Industrial
Engineering course content is very comprehensive and relevant to the job.
28
Frequency
0
1
10
9
10
30
Score
0
2
30
36
50
118
3.93
Percent
0.00%
3.33%
33.33%
30.00%
33.33%
100.00%
29
Table 6 shows that 33.33 percent of the respondents Strongly Agree and
another 33.33 percent Agree that the program components are relevant to the job,
while 30 percent Moderately Agree, and 3.33 percent Disagree. Based on the
results, almost
all of the respondents either agree or strongly agree that the program components of
Industrial Engineering are relevant to the job.
The objectives of the program were achieved.
Table 7. The Objectives of the Program were Achieved
Response
Strongly Disagree (1)
Disagree (2)
Agree (3)
Moderately Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
Total
Standard Weighted Mean
Frequency
0
3
10
11
6
30
Score
0
6
30
44
30
110
3.67
Percent
0.00%
10.00%
33.33%
36.67%
20.00%
100.00%
30
Table 7 shows that 36.67 percent of the respondents Moderately Agree that the
objectives of the program were achieved, while 33.33 percent Agree, 20 percent
Strongly Agree, and 10 percent Disagree. Based on the results, most of the
respondents moderately agree that the objectives of the Industrial Engineering program
were achieved.
The objectives of the program are similar to the objectives of the workplace.
Table 8. The Objectives of the Program are Similar to the Objectives of the
Workplace
Response
Strongly Disagree (1)
Disagree (2)
Agree (3)
Moderately Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
Total
Standard Weighted Mean
Frequency
0
3
13
9
5
30
Score
0
6
39
36
25
106
3.53
Percent
0.00%
10.00%
43.33%
30.00%
16.67%
100.00%
31
Figure 5. The Objectives of the Program are Similar to the Objectives of the
Workplace
Table 8 shows that 43.33 percent of the respondents Agree that the objectives
of the program are similar to the objectives of the workplace, while 30 percent
Moderately Agree, 16.67 percent Strongly Agree, and 10 percent Disagree. Based
on the results, most of the respondents agree that the objectives of the Industrial
Engineering program are similar to the objectives of the workplace.
The program length is sufficient to produce graduates with the required entry-level
knowledge and/or skill in the field or workplace.
32
Frequency
0
3
10
10
7
30
Score
0
6
30
40
35
111
3.70
Percent
0.00%
10.00%
33.33%
33.33%
23.33%
100.00%
Table 9 shows that both 33.33 percent of the respondents Agree and another
33.33 percent Moderately Agree that the program length is sufficient to produce
graduates with the required entry-level knowledge and/or skills in the field or workplace.
While 23.33 percent Strongly Agree, and 10 percent Disagree. Based on the results,
most of the respondents either agree or moderately agree that the program length of
33
The program description captures the types of duties a graduate is expected to perform
in the work environment.
Table 10. The Program Description Captures the Types of Duties a Graduate
is Expected to Perform in the Work Environment
Response
Strongly Disagree (1)
Disagree (2)
Agree (3)
Moderately Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
Total
Standard Weighted Mean
Frequency
0
2
12
12
4
30
Score
0
4
36
48
20
108
3.60
Percent
0.00%
6.67%
40.00%
40.00%
13.33%
100.00%
34
Frequency
0
1
10
12
7
30
Score
0
2
30
48
35
115
3.83
Percent
0.00%
3.33%
33.33%
40.00%
23.33%
100.00%
35
Table 11 shows that 40 percent of the respondents Moderately Agree that the
courses are relevant to the intended career, while 33.33% Agree, 23.33 percent
Strongly Agree, and 3.33 percent Disagree. Based on the results, most of the
respondents moderately agree that the Industrial Engineering courses are relevant to
the intended career.
36
The Quality of instruction is sufficient and provides what is required in the workplace.
Table 12. The Quality of Instruction is Sufficient and Provides What is
Requested in the Workplace
Response
Strongly Disagree (1)
Disagree (2)
Agree (3)
Moderately Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
Total
Standard Weighted Mean
Frequency
0
5
10
9
6
30
Score
0
10
30
36
30
106
3.53
Percent
0.00%
16.67%
33.33%
30.00%
20.00%
100.00%
Figure 9. The Quality of Instruction is Sufficient and Provides What is Requested in the
Workplace
Table 12 shows that 33.33 percent of the respondents Agree that the quality of
instruction is sufficient and provides what is required in the workplace, while 30 percent
Moderately Agree, 20 percent Strongly Agree, 16.67 percent Disagree. Based on
37
the results, most of the respondents agree that the quality of instruction is sufficient and
provides what is required in the workplace.
Frequency
0
6
9
11
4
30
Score
0
12
27
44
20
103
3.43
Percent
0.00%
20.00%
30.00%
36.67%
13.33%
100.00%
Figure 10. The Quantity of Instruction is Sufficient to the Requirements of the Workplace
38
Table 13 shows that 36.67 percent of the respondents Moderately Agree that
the quantity of instruction is sufficient to the requirements of the workplace, while 30
percent Agree, 20 percent Disagree, and 13.33 percent Strongly Agree. Based on
the results, most of the respondents moderately agree that the quantity of instruction is
sufficient to the requirements of the workplace.
The Quality of guidance services is sufficient to the requirements of the workplace.
Table 14. The Quality of Guidance Services is Sufficient to the Requirements of
the Workplace
Response
Strongly Disagree (1)
Disagree (2)
Agree (3)
Moderately Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
Total
Standard Weighted Mean
Frequency
0
2
13
9
6
30
Score
0
4
39
36
30
109
3.63
Percent
0.00%
6.67%
43.33%
30.00%
20.00%
100.00%
39
Frequency
1
2
8
12
7
30
Score
1
4
24
48
35
112
3.73
Percent
3.33%
6.67%
26.67%
40.00%
23.33%
100.00%
40
Table 15 shows that 40 percent of the respondents Moderately Agree that the
interpersonal relationships were developed in school, while 26.67 percent Agree,
23.33 percent Strongly Agree, 6.67 percent Disagree, and 3.33 percent Strongly
Disagree. Based on the results, most of the respondents moderately agree that
interpersonal relationships were developed in school.
The On-the-Job training or internship is enough to equip the students with hands-on
experiences related to the job.
Table 16. The On-the-Job Training or Internship is Enough to Equip the
Students with Hands-on Experiences Related to the Job
Response
Strongly Disagree (1)
Disagree (2)
Agree (3)
Moderately Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
Total
Standard Weighted Mean
Frequency
0
4
11
7
8
30
Score
0
8
33
28
40
109
3.63
Percent
0.00%
13.33%
36.67%
23.33%
26.67%
100.00%
41
42
Mean
Verbal Interpretation
3.93
moderately agree
3.93
moderately agree
3.83
moderately agree
3.73
moderately agree
3.7
moderately agree
3.67
moderately agree
3.63
moderately agree
3.63
moderately agree
3.6
moderately agree
3.53
moderately agree
3.53
moderately agree
43
3.43
Agree
3.68
moderately agree
Table 17 shows that the average of the respondents "moderately agree" on the
following measures: The course content is very comprehensive and relevant to the
job; The program components are relevant to the job; The courses are relevant to
the intended career; The program length is sufficient to produce graduates with the
required entry-level knowledge and/or skill in the field/workplace; The objectives of the
program were achieved; The Quality of guidance services is sufficient to the
requirements of the workplace; The On-the-Job training/internship is enough to equip
the students with hands-on experiences related to the job; The program description
captures the types of duties a graduate is expected to perform in the work environment;
The objectives of the program is similar to the objectives of the workplace; and The
Quality of instruction is sufficient and provides what is required in the workplace, while
the respondents agree on the following measures: The Quantity of instruction is
sufficient to the requirements of the workplace. Finally, the previous table shows a
composite mean of 3.68 percent with a verbal interpretation of moderately agree as an
overall assessment of the program. Based on average, majority of the measures in the
assessment of the program have been evaluated by the respondents as moderately
agree.
44
A study of Cosser (2003) complements the result of the measure stating that
The course content is very comprehensive and relevant to the job, and that 78 percent
of the employers indicated their satisfaction on the relevance of course content to
industry/business needs. Synthesizing the result and study, it shows that both
employers and graduates agree and indicate satisfaction with the relevancy of the
course content to the job. Meanwhile, the study of Chavez & Dotong (2008) also
provided similar results of the same measure mentioned regarding the relevance of the
Industrial Engineering curriculum to present employment.
Frequency
0
1
9
14
6
30
Score
0
2
27
56
30
115
3.83
Percent
0.00%
3.33%
30.00%
46.67%
20.00%
100.00%
45
46
Frequency
0
0
5
9
16
30
Score
0
0
15
36
80
131
4.37
Percent
0.00%
0.00%
16.67%
30.00%
53.33%
100.00%
Table 19 shows that 53.33 percent of the respondents gained Very Much
response in assessment of developing their ability to work as a team member, while 30
percent responded with Much, and 16.67 percent responded with Moderate. Based
on the results, majority of the respondents gained very much in developing their ability
to work as a team member after taking the Industrial Engineering course at Lyceum of
the Philippines-Laguna.
47
Frequency
0
0
7
11
12
30
Score
0
0
21
44
60
125
4.17
Percent
0.00%
0.00%
23.33%
36.67%
40.00%
100.00%
Table 20 shows that 40 percent of the respondents gained Very Much response
in the assessment on the graduates motivation to do their best work, while 36.67
percent responded with Much, and 23.33 percent responded with Moderate. Based
48
on the results, most of the respondents were very much motivated to do their best work
after taking the Industrial Engineering course at Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna.
Provided me with a broad overview of my course/major.
Table 21. Provided me with a Broad Overview of my Course/Major
Response
Very little (1)
Little (2)
Moderate (3)
Much (4)
Very much (5)
Total
Standard Weighted Mean
Frequency
1
3
7
14
5
30
Score
1
6
21
56
25
109
3.63
Percent
3.33%
10.00%
23.33%
46.67%
16.67%
100.00%
Table 21 shows that 46.67 percent of the respondents gained Much broad
overview of their course/major, while 23.33 percent responded with Moderate, 16.67
percent responded with Very Much, 10 percent answered Little and 3.33 percent
49
answered Very Little. Based on the results, most of the respondents gained much
broad overview of their course/major after taking the Industrial Engineering course at
Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna.
Frequency
1
1
8
10
10
30
Score
1
2
24
40
50
117
3.90
Percent
3.33%
3.33%
26.67%
33.33%
33.33%
100.00%
50
Developed my initiative
Table 23. Developed my Initiative
Response
Very little (1)
Little (2)
Moderate (3)
Much (4)
Very much (5)
Total
Standard Weighted Mean
Frequency
0
0
6
13
11
30
Score
0
0
18
52
55
125
4.17
Percent
0.00%
0.00%
20.00%
43.33%
36.67%
100.00%
51
Frequency
0
0
9
13
8
30
Score
0
0
27
52
40
119
3.97
Percent
0.00%
0.00%
30.00%
43.33%
26.67%
100.00%
52
Developed my creativity
Table 25. Developed my Creativity
Response
Very little (1)
Little (2)
Moderate (3)
Much (4)
Very much (5)
Total
Standard Weighted Mean
Frequency
0
1
10
11
8
30
Score
0
2
30
44
40
116
3.87
Percent
0.00%
3.33%
33.33%
36.67%
26.67%
100.00%
53
Frequency
0
1
8
14
7
30
Score
0
2
24
56
35
117
3.90
Percent
0.00%
3.33%
26.67%
46.67%
23.33%
100.00%
54
Table 26 shows that 46.67 percent of the respondents gained Much confidence
to investigate new ideas, while 26.67 percent answered Moderate, 23.33 percent
replied with Very Much and 3.33 percent gained a Little. Based on the results, most
of the respondents gained much confidence to investigate new ideas after taking the
Industrial Engineering course at Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna.
Developed my problem-solving skills
Table 27. Developed my Problem-Solving Skills
Response
Very little (1)
Little (2)
Moderate (3)
Much (4)
Very much (5)
Total
Standard Weighted Mean
Frequency
0
1
10
11
8
30
Score
0
2
30
44
40
116
3.87
Percent
0.00%
3.33%
33.33%
36.67%
26.67%
100.00%
55
Frequency
0
1
5
15
9
30
Score
0
2
15
60
45
122
4.07
Percent
0.00%
3.33%
16.67%
50.00%
30.00%
100.00%
56
Frequency
0
1
9
14
6
30
Score
0
2
27
56
30
115
3.83
Percent
0.00%
3.33%
30.00%
46.67%
20.00%
100.00%
57
Frequency
0
1
9
15
5
30
Score
0
2
27
60
25
114
3.80
Percent
0.00%
3.33%
30.00%
50.00%
16.67%
100.00%
58
Frequency
0
1
11
13
5
30
Score
0
2
33
52
25
112
3.73
Percent
0.00%
3.33%
36.67%
43.33%
16.67%
100.00%
59
Frequency
0
5
6
12
7
30
Score
0
10
18
48
35
111
3.70
Percent
0.00%
16.67%
20.00%
40.00%
23.33%
100.00%
60
Frequency
0
1
8
12
9
30
Score
0
2
24
48
45
119
3.97
Percent
0.00%
3.33%
26.67%
40.00%
30.00%
100.00%
61
Measures
Mean
Verbal Interpretation
4.37
moderately agree
4.17
moderately agree
Developed my initiative.
4.17
moderately agree
4.07
moderately agree
3.97
moderately agree
3.97
moderately agree
3.9
moderately agree
3.9
moderately agree
62
Developed my creativity.
3.87
moderately agree
3.87
moderately agree
3.83
moderately agree
3.83
moderately agree
3.80
moderately agree
3.73
moderately agree
3.70
moderately agree
3.63
moderately agree
* Composite Mean
3.92
moderately agree
Developed
63
64
Percent
6.67%
80.00%
13.33%
100.00%
Frequency
Position
Clerical/Rank and file
7
22
Professional/ Technical/ Supervisory level
1
No response
30
Total
Percent
23.33%
73.33%
3.33%
100.00%
Table 35 shows the current employment status and position of the graduates. In
the employment status, 80 percent are Regular/Permanent, and 6.67 percent are
Contractual/Temporary. 13.33 percent did not respond to the current employment
status.
In
the
current
position,
73.33
percent
are
in
the
65
Relationship between the assessment of the program and status of employment and the
current position
Ho: There is no significant relationship between the assessment of the program
and status of employment and the current position.
Table 36. Relationship between the Assessment of the Program and Status of
Employment and the Current Position
Correlation
coefficient, r
Probability
Verbal interpretation
Status of employment
-0.286
0.157
Not significant
Current position
0.126
0.514
Not significant
Table 36 shows the correlation coefficient value of the status of employment and
the current position with values of -0.286 and 0.126 respectively, with status of
employment having a probability of 15.70 percent and current position of 51.40 percent.
Based on the results, there is an inverse relationship between the assessment of the
program and the status of employment, while there is a direct relationship between the
assessment of the program and the current position. Relationships, however, are not
significant (Accept Ho).
66
Relationship between the assessment of learning and status of employment and the
current position
Ho: There is no significant relationship between the assessment of learning and
status of employment and the current position.
Table 37. Relationship between the Assessment of Learning and Status of
Employment and the Current Position
Correlation
coefficient, r
Probability
Verbal interpretation
Status of employment
-0.187
.362
Not significant
Current position
0.244
.203
Not significant
67
Status of employment
t-value
0.000
Probability (p)
1.000
Verbal interpretation
Not significant
Table 38 shows the t-test value of 0.00 with a probability of 100 percent for the
status of employment between males and females. Based on the results, there is no
significant difference in the status of employment between male and female
respondents (p=1.0) (Accept H o). The results had similar findings in the study of Baes &
Magnaye (2004) that the status of employment had no significant relationship with the
biographical characteristics of the graduates, specifically, gender. For almost a decade,
the result still did not indicate significant relationship between status of employment and
gender.
To help the interpretation of the data, the researchers have tallied survey
answers regarding the status of employment of each respondent while considering their
gender.
Table 39. Tallied Results between Males and Females Regarding the Status of
Employment
Status of Employment
Male
Percent
Female
Percent
68
Temporary/Contractual
Regular/Permanent
No Reply
Total
1
12
2
15
6.67%
80.00%
13.33%
100.00%
1
12
2
15
6.67%
80.00%
13.33%
100.00%
Result shows that two are Temporary/Contractual which consists of a male and
a female. Similarly, Regular/Permanent consists of equal counts for both genders until
No Reply. Through observation of the results, it tells that there is no significant
difference in the status of employment between males and females.
69
Chapter 5
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This
chapter
will
discuss
the
summary
of
findings,
conclusions
and
recommendations that is based on the previous chapter of this study. The summary of
findings
will
be
discussed
first,
followed
by
conclusions,
then
finally
the
Summary of findings
1. There are 73 respondents of the study. Thirty of the 73 respondents
answered the survey, where there are 15 male and 15 female
respondents, with a total of 30 survey responses.
70
2. Majority of the graduates (83.33 percent) have earned an initial gross monthly
income of 10,000 to less than 15,000 in their first job. The minority (13.33
percent) on the other hand, have a monthly income of 15,000 to less than
20,000. 3.33 percent of the respondents have indicated an initial gross
monthly income of 5000 to less than 10,000.
3. Most of the graduates (36.67 percent) have stayed in their jobs for one year
to less than two years. This is followed by one to six months (20 percent),
then two years to less than three years (16.67 percent), and then three to less
than four years (10 percent). Ten percent of the respondents did not indicate
their employment length.
4. Majority of the graduates have an employment status of regular or permanent
(80 percent) in their respective jobs while the minority (6.67 percent) are
temporary or contractual. 13.33 percent of the respondents did not indicate
their employment status.
5. Majority of the graduates (73.33 percent) belong to positions classified as
professional/technical/supervisory level of work while the minority (23.33
percent) works as clerks or rank and file employees. 3.33 percent of the
respondents did not indicate their current job position.
71
72
Conclusions
1. The initial salary of an Industrial Engineering graduate of Lyceum of the
Philippines-Laguna can range from 5,000 up to 20,000 during his/her first job,
where 10,000 up to 15,000 is more often or common.
2. The Industrial Engineering graduates of Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna stay in
their first job that ranges from one month up to three to less than four years.
Where most of the graduates stay for one year to less than two years.
3. Majority of the Industrial Engineering graduates of Lyceum of the PhilippinesLaguna have an employment status of regular or permanent. Few of the
graduates obtained a temporary or contractual employment status.
4. Majority of the Industrial Engineering graduates of Lyceum of the PhilippinesLaguna are working in the professional/technical/supervisory level of work. Only
few work as a clerk or rank and file.
5. The graduates evaluate the Industrial Engineering program as Moderately
Agree with a composite mean of 3.68. Similarly, in the assessment of learning
for the Industrial Engineering course, it obtained a composite mean of 3.92 with a
verbal interpretation of Moderately Agree. The evaluation tells that Lyceum of
the Philippines-Laguna has provided quality education to the graduates.
73
Its objectives were achieved, and are similar to that of the workplace;
74
75
Recommendations
The researchers would like to recommend the following:
For the Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna:
The course syllabus should be given importance by the institution since the
review of curriculum is done yearly by each department with the help of professors,
alumni and industry partners. The quality of teaching should also be emphasized well.
This may consist of factors such as methods of teaching of the instructors, and the
qualifications of teachers. On the-job training/Internship may need improvement, such
as extending the current period length to ensure that the graduates are more prepared
for the job. There should also be updated current and integrated industry-based
software tools to improve computer literacy of students. Students should be trained
more in written communication since this is a significant skill to any job.
76