The Lords Of Lies: Part I - Lords Of Lies

The morally bankrupt propagandists (a.k.a. "journalists" and "reporters") of the mass media has, it
seems, made it their mission to spread their malevolent lies about me as much as they can. It is easy to
discount their nonsense as the babble of deranged savages, but their hateful wailing-choir just keeps
growing. Even after more than 13 years after my arrest hardly a month passes by without a headline
with my name in it showing up in some crappy tabloid in Norway. The anti-Varg campaign in this sorry
country is massive.
The latest addition to the petty wailing choir is a Hollywood producer and his director, who plan to
make a film about the Norwegian Black Metal scene as it was in 1991-1993. Or so they say anyhow. As
a basis for their film they have the ridiculously amateurish "Lords Of Chaos" book, and the film's script
was apparently written by some Jews in New York and a metal-head who claims to be a NorwegianAmerican, because his grandfather was from Norway. (I wonder where his other three grandparents
come from.) None of them has ever spoken to any of the parties involved, in the scene in 1991-1993,
before writing the script, according to the producer, because they want to be "objective". (He said so in
an interview to a local newspaper in Troms, printed today). From another newspaper I learn about the
plot, and they reveal some of the locations in Bergen the filmmakers want to use when they shoot the
film. In their attempt to be "objective" they of course have ended up with no idea about what really
happened, why it happened, where we used to hang out or anything, and to me this film just looks like
a big, bad joke.
The newspaper headlines spell "Film about the Count", "Varg Vikernes goes to Hollywood" and so
forth, but it's just a hoax; they misuse my (nick-)name to promote a film that obviously has nothing to
do with me. They don't even base it on reality, but on the laveyish1 lies of Michael Jenkins Moynihan
and his idiot companion, Didrik Sderlind, the two satanic clowns responsible for "Lords Of Chaos".
So, I will encourage everybody to sabotage this film and the production of this film by all legal means,
and to simply boycott it.
Thank You for Your attention.
Footnotes:
1. From the name of Anton LaVey. The founder of the sorry "Church of Satan".
Varg Vikernes
02.09.2006 (Troms, Norway)

Amicus certus in re incerta cernitur

(In the time of need you will learn who your friends are)

The Lords Of Lies: Part II - Deus Ex Machina

In 2005 I published an article called "Euronymous" (in "A Burzum Story"). I did this in an attempt to
stop all the lies and false rumours put out by journalists, reporters, my enemies, my "friends" (!) and
indeed even by the legal system in Norway. I heard dozens of different theories regarding the "true"
reason why I ended up killing Aarseth, and they were all nonsense.
In early 2006 the department of justice was supposed to consider my application for a release, and "by
chance" the press in Norway, at the exact same time, decided to write about this "Euronymous" article,
and told their readers that I was "bragging" about the killing. They also interviewed the prosecutor in
my case, who according to them said that my story was "new", "different" from my 1994-story and "not
correct".
They seem to forget about the fact that I described the killing of Aarseth in "Vargsml" too, a book I
wrote in 1994 and published in 1997. All those who have read both this (poor) book and my article
about "Euronymous" will know that my story has been the same all the time, and I think the prosecutor
must have mistaken his 1994-theory for the truth. Well, I'm sorry to say so, dear prosecutor, but Your
theory was nonsense.
My story is the truth, but of course I can say that a million times and it won't change anything. So I
have decided to instead publish a letter I received from a former friend of Aarseth, after he read my
article. For now he insists on being anonymous, because he fears media-prosecution, so I have blacked
out his band's name, a date and his signature.
The letter is in Norwegian so I have translated it into English to help the reader understand what he
says. Enjoy:

"Varg,
I have never met you, i.e. I know you played in Old Funeral when you were support for [band name] in
Bergen in [date]. You probably peripherally know who I am anyhow.
I have for a long time had my suspicions regarding the real reasons why you killed Aarseth, but a light
was turned on when I read what you had published on Burzum.org. I was touring with Mayhem last
spring and heard a version of this from Jan and Jrn backing your story. They were also tired of Aarseth
at the time. I remember I withdrew from the milieu the summer of 1993 because of all the commotion
in the media with the church fires et cetera. I met Aarseth in a pub in Oslo and he said he wanted (or
"had in mind") to get rid of you. I also know that you had a good reason to feel threatened because he
had gotten rid of people before with poison and so forth. I remember this especially well nowadays
because I began writing a book about my own 90ies and the memories are coming back to me as I write
the script. I don't know why I am now writing to you, but I guess it's an attempt to work myself out of
everything that happened. A darkness clouds my own memories from 1986 to 1993 that I work on here.
I now understand much better than I did then about how we all were deceived into a sphere of lies
through Aarseth's philosophy about how the scene should be like.

All of this are things I hope no young ones today are bothered to be deceived into. I am pissed when I
remember all the idiotic things Aarseth had in mind.
Good luck with the rest of your time in prison and just be aware that we who know more than the
media version will hardly blame you for anything when you get back out.
With friendly regards,
[name]
[e-mail address]"
The letter speaks for itself, but I guess I should explain what the author means when he says Aarseth
had gotten rid of people before, with poison. He refers to something that happened in (I think) 1990,
when Aarseth according to himself poisoned a Polish guy (I think with arsenic) because he "got tired of
him". He carefully claimed, in 1991, that the Polish guy had become very ill and because of that
"finally" returned to Poland, where he died after two or three months.
Aarseth was a notorious liar, so I don't know if this is a true story, but that's what he (and the other
Mayhem guys) told us anyhow.
In addition to this I wish to add that Aarseth was a convicted felon. He had a conviction for aggravated
assault, because he once injured two guys with a broken liquor bottle in a fight on a bus stop. He was
not a very nice guy, and obviously I had my reasons to fear for my life when he decided to "get rid of"
me. He planned to murder me.
I'm not "bragging" when I speak about the killing. I'm just trying to defend myself against the lies and
false rumours. This is my right, in fact it's a human right, and I expect that even the most petty,
degenerated and retarded journalist scum out there respect this.
Why don't You interview Aarseth's former friends instead, Jan-Axel Blomberg and Snorre W. Ruch and
others, who can all confirm my story and tell You that I have been right all the time?!
I was falsely convicted in 1994 (and 1998 too for that sake) and the journalists in Norway know it. But
they're all Judeo-Christian or Socialist extremists and I'm a Pagan/Nationalist, so
Varg Vikernes
06.10.2006 (Troms, Norway)

Cogitationis Poenam Nemo Patitur

(No man is punished for his thoughts)

The Lords Of Lies: Part III - Procul Este

Profani
Too often I get letters from individuals who refer to things I am supposed to have said on this or that
web-site. Apparently I have been talking about "wolfism" on something called "MySpace", although I
have no idea what "wolfism" or "MySpace" is. On another website or chat-board I was reprehended for
asking stupid questions to some Norwegian reality-celebrity, in spite of the fact that I have never even
thought about communicating with this celebrity before, ever!
I guess it's normal for guys out there to use other persons' names and to pretend they are somebody else
online, but I find it hard to understand how anybody who at least vaguely knows who I am can believe
they are communicating with me when they communicate with a "Varg Vikernes" online. I don't even
have a PC, and even when I had one I never had access to the Internet. Of course not; I'm in prison!
I have a problem with lies and false rumours about me, and in an attempt to stop at least some of these I
will simply tell You all to only trust what You read on www.burzum.org. I never write anything for any
other websites out there. If it's not on www.burzum.org then it's not true. As simple as that.
Www.burzum.com used to be the official Burzum website, but that's many years ago. I told Rainer (the
original host) to close the website down, I think in 2000 (but I'm not sure), but instead he turned it into
an archive. Some years later he sold the address to somebody else, without ever asking me for
permission to do so, and my problem with an "open forum" for lies, false rumours and other crap was
back. I don't know who is behind www.burzum.com and I guess whey mean well, but I wish everybody
boycotted the site 100%. If there are any other websites out there dedicated to Burzum (or me) I wish
You were all boycotting them as well. They are all a problem to me. The only website I support (in this
context) is www.burzum.org!
If those who run www.burzum.com (or other websites in the same vein) want to in any way support me
they should close down their website, and I encourage You to do so! Whether You mean well or not;
just stop it! Remove everything from the Internet, and allow those who have an interest in the truth to
find it without first having to plow through all Your bullshit. Support www.burzum.org only! That's all
I have to say about this.
Varg Vikernes
28.10.2006 (Troms, Norway)

The Lords Of Lies: Part IV - Honoris Causa

There are a few things I wish to tell the administrators of other websites:
Don't take material from www.burzum.org and publish it on Your own website without my
permission. means "copyright", and articles marked " Varg Vikernes" is my property.
Stealing is dishonourable, and doing it on the Internet is no different.
Don't pretend to have my permission to publish my articles or anything else I have written when
You don't. Lying is dishonourable and trying to lie behind a person's back is even worse. I am in
prison alright, but I know perfectly well what is going on on the Internet, thanks to the invention
of printers. I get updated on a more or less regular basis, from several different sources.
Men with honour respect what others tell them. When I for instance say that a website is a
problem to me it does not mean that I am misinformed. It means that the website is a problem to
me. You may not understand why, or even understand why I don't elaborate on this, but that
changes nothing.
When somebody running a website uses my name/address but shows little or no respect for me
or what I tell them, I start to suspect that they have ulterior and questionable motives for
running the website. The fact that You never even bothered to ask me for my opinion does not
make the situation any better. To misuse a person's name is dishonourable.
If you wish to give a "balanced" picture of Burzum and/or me You should get a job in the Jewpress. That's what they have been claiming to do the last 14 years or so now. "Balanced" means
"edited", and "edited" means "censored and manipulated". And besides, what do You know
about the truth in this context anyhow? I support www.burzum.org because it is not "balanced";
instead it contains the facts, uncensored and unedited, and anybody who wishes to make up an
own opinion can do it by themselves, without the (patronizing) "help" of anybody else.
Anybody who wants to embrace the classical Indo-European values should know what honour means,
and should live an honourable life too. If not for me then for the sake of their honour. If You are truly
Indo-European, in mind and spirit too, then You hold Your honour higher than anything else. To
advocate one thing and do another is Jesuitical.
There are many honourable ways to spread Indo-European values and culture. Misusing my name is
not one of them.
Dixi.
Varg Vikernes
16.12.2006

"An honourable death is better than a dishonourable life."

(Cornelius Tacitus)

The Lords Of Lies: Part V - Outlaw

Our dear burzum.org administrator politely asked me to write a few lines about the book menitoned in
the "Dagbladet" interview from earlier this year.
Currently I am translating "Trolldom og Religion i Oldtidens Scandinavia" ("Sorcery and Religion in
Ancient Scandinavia") into English and working to finish the "Belus" album, so I don't have the time to
translate "Vargr Vum" ("wolf in the temple", meaning "outlaw"), the book mentioned in "Dagbladet".
Not sure when or even if I will translate "VV" either, because, frankly, I am not very interested in the
subject (Black Metal anno 1991-1993) anymore. I am more likely to simply rewrite the whole book in
English instead - some time in the future. Don't wait up for it, though. This book is not a priority to me,
and the Norwegian Black Metal scene really doesn't deserve the attention.
Varg Vikernes
December 2009

Written for www.burzum.org exclusively.

The Lords Of Lies: Part VI - The Lords of

Chaos Movie

The first question that came into my mind when I heard about the plans for a Lords of Chaos movie
was "why"? Why on earth would anyone want to make a film based on that worthless book? How is it
even possible when the book is made up of nothing but a number of inaccurate interviews,
supplemented by unfounded claims and meaningless and utterly ignorant theories by the writers? When
I saw that I was a character in the movie I was even more puzzled, and my next question was naturally;
"can they even do that?" They never asked for my permission to use my name or my story.
Now, they are apparently basing the story of this movie not on my story, but on the Lords of Chaos
story. Unfortunately the Lords of Chaos story is not only nonsense; incoherent and utterly
contradictive, but it is also very lacking in information regarding the lives and traits of the individuals
to be included as characters in the movie. One could easily think that this would make it impossible for
anybody to make a movie based on this book, but of course if you simply fill in the holes yourself...
As I write this I am smiling, because this is funny. In a bizarre and weird kind of way it really is. They
base it on a fictional story that is based on real events and poorly written by two ignorant amateurs,
then write a script without ever talking to anyone who might know something about the story the two
ignorant amateurs base their story on, and then have a few more Hollywood individuals re-write the
script a few times, to make it fit into the Hollywood-mold, of course. What are we left with? Well;
another Hollywood movie "based on real events", of course. (You don't actually think the other
Hollywood movies "based on real events" are any better, do you!?)
I honestly couldn't care less about what this movie might do to the contemporary Black Metal scene, or
what it might do to any other metal scene for that sake, so I am not even going to discuss that. Being an
egocentric and egotistical bastard I naturally only care about what this movie might do to me, and you
know what? It cannot hurt me, no matter what. It can only increase my market value, so to speak,
making it easier for me to sell more albums, publish and sell more books, and so forth, so... It'll give
me even more freedom to do what I want. If I want to I can always tell the true story myself, later on,
and even more individuals will be interested in the true story if these guys make the movie. I don't

know if they have considered this, or if they care at all, but this is a fact.
Now, I really don't like it when others spread lies about me, and I can tell my truth well enough without
their movie promoting my name, so if the movie is a complete failure I will only be happy. If it is a
success I will also be happy because that will increase my market value even more. So; good luck,
guys, or don't... I really don't care. It's a win-win situation for me.
With that said, I really have to say that the makers of this movie should be ashamed of themselves.
They never asked Euronymous' family for permission to use his tragic story. Nor did they ever ask for
my permission to use my story. Instead they went behind our backs and went to the lowlife writers of
Lords of Chaos. They are in my eyes and for this reason alone nothing but dishonest scum and deserve
to be boycotted by everyone and everything out there. Go find another host, you spineless parasites!
Varg Vikernes
December 2009

Written for www.burzum.org exclusively.

The Lords Of Lies: Part VII - Impersonator's

Paradise
Some e-mails from honest individuals and a few "Google" searches made me realise that there are
many impersonators out there claiming to be me or claiming to run official Burzum websites of some
sort. Let me therefore briefly tell you that I have no website of any kind other than www.burzum.org,
administrated by the honourable BattleGrim. Not on MySpace or anywhere else.
To avoid any confusion in the future I can add that if I ever get my own "space" on MySpace or
anything like that I will announce it on www.burzum.org. If I don't you will know that I am not there.
Not in any shape or form. Not even under a pseudonym or any other disguise.
I can also add, as a reminder, that www.burzum.org came about because BattleGrim and I wanted to
create a site with reliable information about Burzum, to counter all the lies of the music press and other
media institutions -- including the impersonator's paradise (the Internet).
So let me say this once more; the only website with reliable information regarding Burzum (or me for
that sake) is www.burzum.org. If it's not on www.burzum.org it's not true and you shouldn't trust it.
Other's may report Burzum news too, but if it's not on www.burzum.org as well don't trust it until it is.
In other words; if you ever read something about Burzum or me, check out www.burzum.org as well,
and see if it is true... and boycott other Burzum websites claiming to be official or claiming to have my
approval. They don't and they are nothing but problem to me - and sources of misinformation to all of
us.
Varg Vikernes
December 2009

Written for www.burzum.org exclusively.

The Lords Of Lies: Part VIII - The Neanderthal

Nandertal disparat
L'nigme Europenne
L'homme de Nandertal. Cette figure mythique de l'Europe prhistorique rvle plusieurs visages. Dans
l'Histoire des hommes modernes, il a incarn et reflt leur idal social. Tour tour btail colonis et
figure puissante d'intelligence, le foss est sans mesure. Alors qui croire? O chercher? Pourquoi?
S'il est impossible de totalement nous dfaire des subjectifs prjugs et dsirs, Nandertal est l'exemple
parfait de l'histoire torture pour la bonne politique. C'est pourquoi il est important de poser des
questions thoriquement justes, et de demander ceux qui bientt rpondrons, de ne pas nous mentir.
Le premier squelette nandertalien fut dcouvert en 1856. Lorsqu'on a compris qu'il s'agissait d'un autre
groupe d'hommes, indpendant de Sapiens, on a eu vite fait, l'heure du colonialisme, de le traiter en
grand singe bta, afin d'lever Sapiens le sage colon. Nandertal tait reclu au rang de peuple primitif
europen. Aujourd'hui il est interdit de niveler les races ou espces humaines, alors on relve avec joie
et hypocrisie les traits vidents d'intelligence nandertalienne. Mais il est aussi interdit, pour ne pas dire
politiquement absurde, d'imaginer que les races humaines ne proviennent pas d'une seule et mme
heureuse famille. C'est pourquoi l'vidence de l'europen nandertalien est nie.
Nandertal. Situation sociale et socitaire. Une nouvelle place drangeante?
Commenons par un bref expos de la situation sociale actuelle de Nandertal.
L'Histoire qu'ils nous rapportent, pour peu que vous vous y intressiez, vous l'avez entendu, sans aucun
doute. Sinon la voici: L'homme moderne est africain, descendant d'Erectus, il se nomme Homo
Sapiens, l'homme sage. Il y a 150 000 ans, il quitte son Afrique natale pour coloniser le monde.
Aux dernires nouvelles, la sparation entre "Sapiens" (alors Erectus) et le trs controversiel homo
neanderthalensis se serait opre il y a de a 370 000 (Rubin) 500 000 ans (Pbo).
Nandertal, qui obtient dfinitivement son nom il y a grosso modo 250 000 ans est alors le seul habitant
europen; et sa population originelle, toujours selon Svante Pbo, s'lve environ trois mille ttes.
Lorsqu'il y a 40 000 ans, Sapiens arrive en Europe, et quand la dernire trace nandertalienne se date de
- 28 000, on imagine tout.
Nota bene. Le squelette de l'enfant mtiss (Nandertal/Sapiens) de Lagar Velho (Portugal) daterait de 24 500. De ce fait, quant bien mme il s'agisse d'un cas de mtissage sporadique, cela signifierait que
ses parents, et donc son pre ou sa mre nandertalien(ne) serait plus jeune que - 28 000.
Le dernier - et largement diffus - documentaire (BBC World, 2009) en date traitant du sujet est
l'Aventure des premiers hommes - The incredible human journey, ralis par David Stewart, Charles
Colville, Philip Smith, Peter Oxley.

Divis en cinq pisodes suivant la colonisation des cinq continents, il fait suite l'annonce (2006) du
squenage du gnome de Nandertal par l'institut Max Planck.
Les documentaires, ces derniers temps, ils ont pousss comme des champignons en automne.
Nanderthal de Tony Mitchell en est un autre exemple. Ralis en 2000 et dfinitivement surann par
rapport aux dcouvertes rcentes, il est pourtant largement rediffus par les chanes culturelles bien
pensantes (Arte).
Et c'est cela le plus drangeant. Alors mme que l'quipe de Pbo semble dgager un Nandertal
civilis ou presque beau, et une hybridation Sapiens/Nandertal possible voire quasi certaine, les
vulgarisations nous conditionnent dans l'utopie de la grande famille humaine. Ils vont jusqu' prsenter
un Nandertal auquel personne ne souhaiterait s'apparenter: cheveux noir, quasi bestial voire simiesque,
maladroit, mal-habill - ce qui est fort peu logique, tant donn la zone gographique de son habitat - et
pris en piti par le trs grand et bienveillant Sapiens africain. Icelui a des traits vaguement ngrodes,
mais est malgr tout plus attrayant que son cousin barbare. Est-ce ici la trs vnrable "vrit
scientifique", ou de la pure propagande moderne?
Il y a comme un problme: Cet homme n'est pas notre anctre, il est notre futur. Veillons ne pas
passer pour des imbciles.
La boucle est boucle. volution ou non? Personne ne sait. Mais le mythe est tabli. Adam et la
religion sont, l'heure de la science obsoltes, mais cette mme science nous sert un nouveau multre
dans son ge d'or. Nous provenons du multre, et nous sommes diversifis "lentement" mesure que
nous avancions et nous sparions, en fonction et cause du climat. Aujourd'hui les gens voyagent, vite,
trs vite, et partout. L'idal alors, l'homme le plus adapt, c'est nouveau le multre. On aura compris.
Certains ont peur, vous savez, de ce qu'il sortira de la science. Alors ils censurent. Non, il y a des
choses que vous ne pouvez pas dire.
Mais pourquoi? Au nom de l'galit judo-chrtienne. Comme si Dieu le pre effaait les diffrences,
gommait les classes qui ont toujours scind le monde - en tout cas - caucasien.
Ne serait-ce que soutenir la fois la thorie volutionniste et le fait que l'homme moderne provienne
d'Afrique, et que c'est son voyage et la colonisation du monde qui l'ont rendu intelligent; et
s'merveiller de retrouver la soi-disant plus proche copie du Sapiens antique chez les Bochimans peuple du Kalahari - est d'une stupidit grotesque. Cherchez l'erreur.
Nota bene. Les Africains ont un ADNmt plus diversifi que les tres humains du reste du monde. Est-ce
dire qu'ils ne proviennent pas du mme groupe colonisateur soi-disant parti d'Afrique il y a -150 000
ans?
Ce peuple du Kalahari est d'ailleurs reconnu pour ses traits et sa couleur de peau, dits l'aube de tous
les peuples, reprsentant parfait du Sapiens africain avant sa dispersion dans le monde: Nez pat,
cheveux noirs et crpu, yeux noirs brids, pommettes hautes, couleur plus ou moins sombre. Cherchez
l'intrus.
Alors ne soyons pas racistes pour tre racistes, mais soyons-le s'il le faut. Au nom de la logique et du
savoir. Et surtout, au nom de la lgitime dfense.

Le scandale n des propos racistes du prix Nobel James Watson s'amplifie

L'nigme et l'histoire vraie.
Homo neanderthalensis. Il vivait en Europe depuis longtemps. Trs rsistant, il avait su parer de
nombreux changements climatiques. Court sur pattes, trapu et puissant, son cerveau est connu pour tre
le plus gros de tous les hominids, et son squelette pour son extrme solidit. Pour chasser, il s'asseyait
en effet califourchon sur sa proie et devait rsister aux traumatismes que cette technique provoquait.
Il avait dvelopp un langage et un outillage complexe, enterrait ses morts, possdait des rites
funraires, se parait et se maquillait.
Peinture corporelle ou parures sur Nandertal il y a 50 000 ans?
Il est aujourd'hui connu, a posteriori, que l'ADN mitochondrial, ou ADNmt, de tous les peuples du
monde, except certains peuples africains, ont la mme origine, savoir une certaine ve africaine.
Bien. L'ADNmt est transmis de mre en fille.
La dduction la plus commune est alors de dire, comme on l'a entendu, que tous les peuples du monde
descendent d'un seul et mme groupe africain. Oui, sauf que non. Si l'on suit la dfinition exacte, nous
n'obtenons pas cela. Nous obtenons: l'ADNmt de chaque fille du monde descend de la mme mre
africaine. L, c'est mieux.
Une tude (24.08/2008) parue dans science et avenir nous apprends que le squenage du gnome
mithocondrial d'un homme de Nandertal vieux de 38 000 ans (Grotte de Vindija, Croatie) est termin.
Les rsultats sont tels: L'analyse de ce nouveau matriel montre que les mitochondries de nandertal
ne se retrouvent pas dans la variabilit humaine actuelle. Cela dmontre donc que Nandertal n'a pas
contribu l'ADNmt des Homo sapiens modernes.
Attention, il est important de bien lire: Nandertal n'a pas contribu l'ADNmt des Homo Sapiens
modernes (dits hommes modernes). C'est--dire que nous - ou, plus exactement, seulement le peu
d'individus modernes pris pour l'analyse - n'avons pas - ou peu, donc -, dans notre histoire, de femmes
nandertaliennes. C'est tout.
L'ADNmt de Nandertal
ADN mitochondrial, H. sapiens et H. neanderthalensis
Nota bene. L'on ignore de qu'elle variabilit humaine actuelle ces messieurs parlent. Car en France,
figurez-vous qu'un franais noir est un franais. Si.
Non, parce que je voudrais vous soumettre une hypothse.
L'on sait, ou l'on imagine, que Nandertal manquait de femelles. Oui, car ces demoiselles chassaient
aussi. Et souvenez-vous, comme les toreros hein, rien que a. La supposition, qui n'est pas de moi, est
donc la suivante: elles taient plus faibles, donc, puisqu'elles vivaient la mme chose que les hommes,
elles mourraient plus vite et plus facilement. D'autant plus qu'elles allaitaient leur enfant jusqu' cinq ou
sept ans - 1 000 calories supplmentaires chaque jour, plus une perte chronique de chaleur -, et, comme
chez tous les mammifres, elles tombaient enceintes et accouchaient. Avec la perte d'nergie et les

risques que cela comporte.

Chez Sapiens, la situation est diffrente. Lui, venant des climats chauds et propices la vgtation, vit
entre autres, de baies, de fruits, de vgtaux. Et les rles sont partags: les femmes cueillent, les
hommes chassent. Beaucoup plus reposant pour ces dames, le travail est aussi moins risqu. Ergo
Sapiens, mme s'il est probable qu'il avait une population de mles lgrement plus importante
(grossesse, accouchement, allaitement), manquait moins de femelles.
Il est tabli que les diffrentes tribus nandertaliennes se volaient leurs femmes tant ils devaient faire
face la pnurie.
Il a t vu aussi, que Nandertal tait certes plus petit, mais beaucoup plus fort. N'oublions pas non plus
qu'il tait en lieu connu.
Alors voyez, l'on s'accordera je crois, pour dire qu'il s'est pass une chose: Sapiens s'est fait dpouiller
de ses femmes par Nandertal. Si cela peut paratre comique, c'est pourtant le plus logique. Quand il
manque cruellement de femmes, vous ne faites plus les difficiles, vous prenez ce qu'il y a.
Vous obtenez ceci: un europen morderne mlang Sapiens/Nandertal, avec, le plus souvent, le crne
et la forme de tte de Sapiens - car quelle femelle sapiens avec un bassin fin sapiens fait pour les petites
ttes sapiens pourrait accoucher d'un bb Nandertal/Sapiens avec une tte norme, faite pour les
bassins nandertaliens larges? La slection naturelle est vite faite. Un europen moderne donc le plus
souvent sans ADNmt nandertalien, mais avec l'ADNmt de Sapiens.
Et surtout, un europen moderne avec une culture contrainte au changement, et notamment, en ce qui
concerne l'aspect social et alimentaire, force au rapprochement, voire l'change avec celle de
Sapiens.
Parce que si vous engagez une femme qui ne peut chasser, dj parce qu'elle ne sait pas faire, mais
aussi parce que compte tenu de la violence des combats et de la nature de son squelette, elle meure sur
le champ; vous tes contraint de suivre son rythme et sa manire de faire. Pour se rendre utile, elle
pourra donc cueillir, et de ce fait, modifier le bol alimentaire de toute l'Europe. La descendance
mtisse Sapiens/Nandertal sera concerne par le mme problme, tant donn la baisse de qualit de
son squelette, qui deviendra incompatible avec l'ancien systme de chasse.
Notons un argument de poids: Les tres humains de l'ge de pierre vivaient dans une socit
matriarcale, car ils ignoraient probablement que la fcondation de la femme provenait de l'homme.
N'oublions pas aussi, que ce sont les femmes qui lvent et modifient la gnration future. Leur
influence, cette poque, sur la culture de tout un groupe, est donc majeure.
Mais continuons.
La crativit europenne remonte environ - 60 000 ans, les premires oeuvres d'arts - 40 000 ans.
Voici une hypothse romantique plutt logique: pour attirer ces femmes Sapiens, ou pour les conserver
et les distraire de leur tristesse certaine, l'homme a mis au point l'art en le dveloppant travers les
bijoux et les statues - de manire instinctive, comme les oiseaux avec leurs belles plumes et leurs
parades.
Une fois qu'il eu compris l'effet de ce travail "inutile", il l'utilisa comme sorcellerie pour absolument

tout. La Vnus bien connue peut reprsenter, non pas une femme obse - il s'agit l d'une stupide
interpretation moderne, car qu'elle connaissance du sur-poids avaient-ils? Et pourquoi auraient-ils
souhait une femme grosse, malade, et infertile? Non pas obse donc, pas enceinte non plus puisqu'une
femme enceinte en bonne sant ne ressemble pas cela, mais une femme tout juste accouche. C'est-dire, ils souhaitaient que l'accouchement se passe, et se passe bien, donc, superstitieux, ils
reprsentaient la femme juste accouche. Dans le principe de la poupe vaudou, ils croyaient que ce
qu'ils reprsentaient taient ou deviendraient ralit.
Homo neanderthalensis ou neandertalensis
Peinture corporelle ou parures sur Nandertal il y a 50 000 ans?
Ce petit billet, comme une bouteille jete dans la mer Internet se perdra sans doute vite, mais il
clairera peut-tre certains. Soit sur le problme Nandertal lui-mme, soit sur la supercherie d'un
monde trop bien pens.
Sur ce, je vous rfre la possibilit de spciation par distance dveloppe par Jean-Luc Voisin.
L'hypothse dveloppe ci-dessus lui est hautement compatible, et explique le dcollage culturel
europen.
O est pass Nandertal?
Nandertal: 3 sous-groupes identifis
Des neandertaliens compltement l'est!
Pour aller plus loin...
Microcephalin.
Foxp2
Le nez long et saillant de Nandertal (et non pas gros pat)
La pilosit nandertalienne
Nandertal roux
Les races nandertaliennes
Nandertal a la peau trs claire
...
Lien
http://intelligence.wikeo.be/accueil.html
La copie de ce document est permise et encourage, tant qu'il reste lisible dans son intgralit et
accompagn du nom de l'auteur.
M. C. de Montzan
Montezan@gmail.com
Si je dsire une eau d'Europe, c'est la flache

Noire et froide o vers le crpuscule embaum

Un enfant accroupi plein de tristesse, lche
Un bateau frle comme un papillon de mai.

The Lords Of Lies: Part IX - A Call For

Resistance
Dear fellow Europeans and all others too,
In 1994 I wrote in "Vargsml" that our governments let so many Muslims into our contries possibly
because they want us to feel threatened enough by them to support Israel no matter what. This was
before the government of the USA in secret launched their terror campaign on their own population,
and blamed the Muslims, to have an excuse to start their "War on Terror" and subdue other countries
without too many protests, but today this fairly original hypothesis from 1994 seems to hold more truth
than I could imagine.
What we have seen since 9/11 is a very aggressive campaign by some groups and companies made up
of very rich individuals to make us all accept more and more surveillance and humiliation in the name
of "the war on terror". They make us give up more and more of our rights and our freedom, and
everything is done in the name of this bogus "war on terror" and of course "security". Our security, of
course... Increased airport control; electronic passports; DNA databases; personal information
databases; more police surveillance; more cameras in more locations; new laws; and so forth. They
introduce new means to improve our "security" almost weekly.
Had they introduced all their means to fights "terrorism" and make our societies "secure" in one day
every single one of us would have realised what they were trying to do and we would have revolted. So
instead they do it gradually and over time. After some time they will have introduced enough means to
make sure that we cannot revolt, even if we see through their lies and break free from their brainwash
and manage to think for ourselves long enough to comprehend that we need to revolt against them. I
may add that we are already way past Orwell's 1984 dystopia in many respects; it's already worse than
this to many of us! Soon everyone will be in chains mental (through brain wash) as well as physical
chains.
So what on Earth is it they want? Why do they want to turn us all into slaves? Of course it's about
power and money that has always been their main driving force but it's also about hatred. These rich
individuals hate us; they hate our culture, they hate our philosophy, our history, our mythology, our
values, our religion and most importantly; they hate us. By us I mean those of European decent. Sure,
they hate just about everyone else too, but their hatred for Europe and everything European is the key
here and the reason they are doing what they do and they don't even understand this themselves! That
only makes them more dangerous though, because they think of themselves and present themselves
with their massive propaganda machinery as the victims whenever we protest against what they do, and
always act in accordance with this.
They think of themselves as above all the rest of us, and somehow believe perhaps instinctively that
they have the right to destroy us if they can. Now, they cannot unless we let them, we are smarter,
stronger and better than them, but for some reason we let them do this, albeit slowly and somewhat
reluctantly, and we have done so since the Christianization of the peoples of Europe, and even more
since anno 1789, and even more since anno 1881, and even more since anno 1918, and even more
since anno 1945, and even more since anno 2001. Today even we hate ourselves, because we are so
messed up mentally by their lie-propaganda and so drained, ruined and exhausted by their 2000 yearold campaign to destroy us.

Dear European brothers and sisters; heed my words and take note of what I say in this call! Be
courageous, be strong, be smart; be European! Rid yourselves of this filthy beast's influence over you
and your home! Heal yourselves! Heal your kin! Heal Europe! To Europe and everyone else too;
RESIST THIS ENEMY!
Anyone who wishes to have my permission to translate this article into any language and publish this
article anywhere and in any form.
Yours truly,
Varg Vikernes
March 2011
In other languages: Deutsch, Espaol, Suomi, Hrvatski, Nederlands, Polski, Srpski, Svenska