Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Although this narrow conception of critical theory originated with the Frankfurt School, it also prevails
among other recent social scientists, such as
Pierre Bourdieu,
Louis Althusser and arguably
Michel Foucault and
Bryan Reynolds,
as well as certain feminist theorists and social scientists.
According to these theorists, a theory is critical to the extent that it seeks human emancipation
to liberate human beings from the circumstances that enslave them (Horkheimer 1982, 244)
Because such theories aim to explain and transform all the circumstances that enslave human beings, many
critical theories in the broader sense have been developed.
world systems theory,
feminist theory,
postcolonial theory,
critical race theory,
critical media studies,
queer theory,
Prominent theorists within this school of thought are: Max Horkheimer, T.W. Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Leo
Lowenthal, and Erich Fromm
Each of these philosophers believed, and shared Karl Marxs theory of Historical Materialism
Each member of the Frankfurt school adjusted Marxism with his additions, or "fix.
Then, they used the "fixed" Marxist theory as a measure modern society needed to meet
These ideas came to be known as "Critical Theory"
Note: Remember Marxist Theory
Developed by Karl Marx in 1880s.
Argues that hierarchical class system is at the root of all social problems and must be ended by a revolution
of the workers.
Dominant classes directly control the means of production (labor, factories and land), which is called the
base of society.
Rulling classes also control the culture, which is called the superstructure of society. Therefore, the dominant
ideology of a society is the ideology of rulling class.
Base: the means of production
Superstructure: a societys culture
Ideology: ideas present in a culture that mislead average people and encourage them to act against their own
interests
The Neo-Marxist Approach: Frankfurt School
The Marxist approach to the media studies developed in parallel with the functionalist approach. It is best
characterized by the work of the Frankfurt School founded in 1923.
The school was concerned with developing a revolutionary, philosophical variant of Western Marxism,
opposed to capitalism in the west and Stalinism in the East, which came to be called critical theory.
In 1930s when Hitler came to power, the Institute was forced to leave Germany for New York.
In 1953 it was re-established in Frankfurt.
Adorno and Horkheimer developed a Marxist sociological approach to media studies. They saw the media as
a cultural industry that maintained power relations and served to lessen the resistance standards of
cultural aesthetics by popularizing certain types of culture.
They produced some of the first accounts within critical social theory of the importance of mass culture and
communication in social reproduction and domination.
They generated one of the first ,modes of a critical cultural studies that analyzes the processes of cultural
production and political economy, the politics of cultural texts, and audience reception and use of cultural
artifacts (Kellner 1989 and 1995)
Frankfurt school developed a critical and transdisciplinary approach to cultural and communications studies,
combining political economy, textual analysis, and analysis of social and ideological effects
The Frankfurt school also had its own effects on philosophy as a whole
It affected philosophy by preserving the notion of meta-analysis of society through its economic, political,
and social systems
It introduced the notion of social philosophy and made theory part of everyday practice by "mixing"
philosophical problems, and empirical problems
Culture Industries
Two of Frankfurt Schools key theorists Max Horkheimer and T.W. Adorno developed an account of the
"culture industry" to call attention to the industrialization and commercialization of culture under capitalist
relations of production
They coined the term "culture industry" to signify the process of the industrialization of mass-produced
culture and the commercial imperatives that drove the system
They analyzed all mass-mediated cultural artifacts within the context of industrial production
They argued the commodities of the culture industries exhibited the same features as other products of mass
production:
commodification,
standardization, and
massification
The culture industries had the specific function, however, of providing ideological legitimation of the
existing capitalist societies and of integrating individuals into its way of life
Moving through nearly all aspects of the popular culture of their time--movies, radio, music--they argue that
the logic of modern capitalism deskills labor and concurrently dumbs down culture. The result is a world in
which a mass public has trouble distinguishing between the real world and the illusory world created by the
industry of culture.
The values perpetuated by the media were contradictory to the values of the radical Enlightenment tradition.
The masses are dumbed by the banality of the media. Their ability to function efficiently as citizens in a
democratic state is replaced by their ceaseless consumption of culture or products, or both.
Though the functionalist and Marxist approaches are radically different in their underlying assumptions, they
are similar in that they both presume audiences to be passive and powerless.
They critique society as being in a state of false consciousness, a consciousness which hides the reality of
domination and oppression of the masses under capitalism. The role of the media in this framework is to
offer to consumers propaganda which lulls them into accepting their conditions.
In their theories of the culture industries and critiques of mass culture, Adorno and Horkheimer were among
the first social theorists to note its importance in the reproduction of contemporary societies
In their view, mass culture and communications stand in the center of leisure activity, are important agents of
socialization, mediators of political reality, and should thus be seen as major institutions of contemporary
societies with a variety of economic, political, cultural and social effects
Furthermore, the critical theorists investigated the cultural industries in a political context as a form of the
integration of the working class into capitalist societies
The Frankfurt school theorists were among the first neo-Marxian groups to examine the effects of mass
culture and the rise of the consumer society on the working classes
They argued that the system of cultural production dominated by film, radio broadcasting, newspapers, and
magazines, was controlled by advertising and commercial imperatives, and served to create subservience to
the system of consumer capitalism
Later, critics pronounced their approach too manipulative, reductive, and elitist.
However, it still provides an important corrective to more populist approaches to media culture that
downplay the way the media industries exert power over audiences and help produce thought and behavior
that conforms to the existing society
The culture industry thesis described both the production of massified cultural products and homogenized
subjectivities
Mass culture for the Frankfurt School produced desires, dreams, hopes, fears, and longings, as well as
unending desire for consumer products
The culture industry produced cultural consumers who would consume its products and conform to the
dictates and the behaviors of the existing society
Frankfurt school work was an articulation of a theory of the stage of state and monopoly capitalism that
became dominant during the 1930s
This was an era of large organizations
The state and giant corporations manage the economy and individuals submit to state and corporate control
This period is often described as "Fordism" to designate the system of mass production and the
homogenizing regime of capital which wanted to produce mass desires, tastes, and behavior
Fordism was an era of mass production and consumption characterized by uniformity and homogeneity of
needs, thought, and behavior producing a mass society
Frankfurt school described it as "the end of the individual"
No longer was individual thought and action the motor of social and cultural progress
Instead giant organizations and institutions overpowered individuals
During this period, mass culture and communication were instrumental in generating the modes of thought
and behavior appropriate to a highly organized and massified social order
Thus, the Frankfurt school theory of the culture industry articulates a major historical shift to an era in which
mass consumption and culture was indispensable to producing a consumer society based on homogeneous
needs and desires for mass-produced products and a mass society based on social organization and
homogeneity
The culture industry fuses the old and familiar into a new quality
The culture industry is not like mass culture which arises spontaneously from the masses themselves
The products are tailored for consumption by masses
These products and the nature of consumption are manufactured more or less according to plan