Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Evaluation Committee
1. Mr. C.S. Lokubarana
Chairman
Member
3. Mrs. W. Athulathmudali
Member
Page 1 of 4
General
Tenders were called for construction of Panel Room in Kebithigollewa Water Supply Scheme on 29th
April, 2015 by publishing open invitation in newspapers.
The tenders were closed on 13 th May, 2015 at 14.00 hrs and following contractors have submitted
their offers. The details of offers received are shown in table 1.
No.
Quoted Amount(Rs)
Without VAT & Contingencies
Name of Tenderer
1/3
Samantha Construction
819,780.00
2/3
Paradise Construction
985,400.00
3/3
Sunrise Construction
954,670.12
Table 1
2.0
Technical Evaluation
2.1
The bidders shall be registered ICTAD contractors with Grade M7 (C8) or above in the field of
Water Supply and Drainage and the details are shown table 2.
ICTAD Registration
No
Name of contractor
Samantha Construction
Paradise Construction
Sunrise Construction
R.No
C
8905
C
12017
C
12768
Grad
e
C7
C7
C7
Field
Building
Construction
Building
Construction
Building
Construction
Expiry Date
Copy of
Registration
22.09.2015
Available
17.07.2015
Available
04.03.2017
Available
Table 2
Page 2 of 4
2.2
Bid Securities
Name of contractor
Samantha Construction
Paradise Construction
Sunrise Construction
Amount (Rs.)
Details
Validity
11.08.2015
09.09.2015
09.09.2015
Table 3
2.3
Requirement
1 Legal Status
2 Form of bid
3 BOQ
Similar Work done
4 during last Five
Years
Proposed Technical
5
staff(TO)
6 Financial Statement
Samantha
Paradise
Construction Construction
Available
Available
(Partnership)
Signed by
Partner;
Signed by
power
Proprietor
attorney is
attached
Rated for all Rated for all
items
items
Not
Available
Available
Not
Available
Available
Not
Available
Not
Available
Sunrise
Construction
Available
Signed but
not indicated
the
designation
Rated for all
items
Available
Available
Available
Table 4
.
Page 3 of 4
3.0
3.1
Financial Evaluation
Arithmetic Corrections
At the financial evaluation we have considered the quoted amounts without contingencies and VAT
of all substantially responsive bids. The detailed evaluation is given below.
3.1.1:
Samantha Construction has submitted the lowest substantially responsive offer for a sum of
Rs. 819,780.00 .No Arithmetic errors were found in his offer.
3.1.2: 2nd Lowest substantially responsive offer
Sunrise Construction has submitted the 2nd lowest substantially responsive offer for a sum of
Rs. 954,670.12. No Arithmetic errors were found in his offer.
3.1.2: 3rd Lowest substantially responsive offer
Paradise Construction has submitted the 3 rd lowest substantially responsive offer for a sum
of Rs 985,400.00. Arithmetic errors were found in his offer.
3.2
No
Name of Contractor
Corrected
amount/Rs
% Variation w.r.t
Engineer s Estimate
Rank
1/3
Samantha Construction
819,780.00
-21.18%
2/3
Paradise Construction
985,400.00
-5.25%
3/3
Sunrise Construction
954,670.12
-8.20%
Table 5
4.0 Recommendations
Considering the facts in technical evaluation and financial evaluation the TEC recommends
awarding the contract the lowest evaluated substantially responsive bidder, Samantha
Construction., for a sum of Rs. 819,780.00 + applicable taxes & contingencies.
Evaluation Committee
Mr. C.S. Lokubarana
- Chairman
..
- Member
..
Mr. W. Athulathmudali
- Account (RSC)
- Member
..
Page 4 of 4