Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
...............................................................................................................1
................................................................................................1
................................................................................................4
.......................................................................................................5
........................................................5
............................8
..................................................................................10
..................................................................10
...................................................... 11
..............................................................................................13
......................................................................13
..................................................................................15
..................................................................................16
..............................................................18
.....................................................................................................21
..............................................................................................21
..............................................................................................21
..............................................................................................21
..............................................................................................22
..............................................................................................23
..........................................................................................23
......................................................................................23
.....................................................................................................27
..........................................................................27
(input)........................................................................................27
(process)............................................................................29
(output)......................................................................................32
(outcome) .....................................................................................46
(cost-efficiency)................................................51
(cost-effectiveness)..........................................52
..................................................................53
......................................................................53
......................................................................56
I
.................................................................................................70
......................................................................................................70
..........................................................................70
......................................................................................71
..........................................................................................75
..............................................................................................80
.....................................................................................................................81
.............................................................................................................................86
..................................................86
..........................................................90
..........................96
......................................................99
....................................................................................122
II
2-1
.........................................15
4-1
.....................................31
4-2
95 ..................................37
4-3
96 ..................................38
4-4
97 ..................................39
4-5
95 ..................................40
4-6
96 ..................................40
4-7
97 ..................................41
4-8
95-97 ...........................42
4-9
95-97 ...........................43
III
2-1
........................9
2-2
.......................................12
3-1
.............................................22
3-2
...................................23
3-3
...................................24
3-4
...................................26
4-1
95 97 ..................29
4-2
95 97 ....29
4-3
95 97 ......................32
4-4
95 97 .........................33
4-5
..............................................34
4-6
95 97 .............................34
4-7
95-97 .............................36
4-8
95-97 ...........................36
4-9
95 ................37
4-10
96 ...............38
4-11
97 ...............39
4-12
........................................45
4-13
97 .............................49
4-14
949597 ...........51
4-15
95-97 ..............................51
4-16
95-97 ..............................52
4-17
95-97 ..............................52
4-18
95-97 ..............................52
IV
/ 1990
( 58%)( 38%)
2000 /( 73.6%)
( 32.9%)(19962008)
/ 62% 73.6%(2008 )
7.88% 5.55% 2000
(5.27%)(4.67%)
95 4832
96 4223 97 4100
19921995 1995
20082005 2005
2003
2002
cost effectiveness
(accountability )
Performance Management
(2009)
(2008)
(1992
1995)
(1992
2008)
(2001)
13%
(
2009)
(
2008)
(2004)
(1996
2007)
(2008)
(2003) 36.17%
58.33%
21.73%
(Clampet-Lundquist,
2003)
(Estrada & Nilsson,
2004)
(2008)
()
(2008)
(2004)
(
2006)(2008)
/( 40%)
()( 20%)(
16%)()( 16%)
25 13 (
52%),( 40%)
( 36%)( 36%)(
24%)( 12%)( 8%)
(2007)
( 2-1)(
)
2-1
1.
2.
10
3.
4.
()
11
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
2-2
26-28
(
2468 )
11
3500
1700
900
900
29-32
12
4000
1800
1100
1100
26
15
4500
2200
1200
1100
31
15
4500
2200
1200
1100
24
12
4500
(
571315 )
(
601 22 )
(
601 79 )
12
age of accountability
1999
2003
2000performance evaluation
control
2004
(cost-benefit analysis)
(cost-effectiveness analysis)(Robbins)
2001(Peter
Drucker)
(doing things right);
13
2001
1993
19971999
2002
2005McGregor
Cederblom (1982)
2005Richard and
Micholas(1995)
2005(1989)
2005(1996)
20052002
14
2005(2002)
2005
19992002
output
outcome
2-1
20052003
1.
2.3.
2001:1.(To
15
Evaluate):2.(To Learn):
3.(To Motivate):
4.(To Promote):
5.(To Celebrate):
2003
(2005)2002
1.
2.
3.
2002
1.
16
2.E
1.
Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry1988
1.2.
3.
4.
5.
Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry1985101.
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
8. 9. 10.
2002
2.
1
17
2
3
4
2005De Neufville
2005
(1999)
(2002)
(2005)
18
Ammon(1996) 1.
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
9. 10.2002Jackson
91. 2. 3. 4. 5.
6. 7. 8. 9.
JacksonAmmon1996
:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
1999
2004
19
95
97
20
95 97
inputthroughputoutputoutcome
1.input
2.throughputs
3.output
4.outcome
2009 2-4
12
2
21
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
3-1
22
(
)
3-2
3 2
A1
(1)
(2)
2 1
A2
(1)
(2)
23
B2
B1B10
B11B12 B3B4B6
B5 B7B8B9
3-3
45
B1
97 11 28
48
B2
(13 )
()
98 3 19
39
B3
(11-12 )
()
97 1 24
36
B4
(6 )
96 7 1
42
B5
(6-7 )
()()
97 2 23
43
B6
(
)
97 2 22
24
3-3
()
52
B7
(
)
97 3 3
40
B8
97 4 11
46
B9
96 12 26
44
B10
97 3 31
38
1 97 3
B11
(
)()
97 4 1
49
B12
96 12 1
25
3-4
B1B10B11B12
B3B4B6
B5
B7B8B9
26
(input)
1.
2.
(1)
23 15 12
15
(2)
DVD
27
(3)
3.
(
)( 4-1)
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
4-1
95 97 (
4-1) 97 29,028
( 4-2)
28
4-1
95 97
95
96
97
1.
4,401,029
5,839,024
6,880,908
2.
2,218,612
1,809,944
1,872,638
3.
470,972
470,972
500,000
4-2
95 97
95
96
97
1,447,572
1,447,572
1,288,632
335,000
335,000
340,000
50,000
50,000
90,000
238,400
238,400
350,000
2,070,972
2,070,972
2,100,000
(process)
(1)
A.
(
) 10
B.
C.
D.
29
(2)
A.
()
80%
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
30
/()
1-3
4-1
97
A.
31
B.
(
E )(
)(
)(
)
C.
D.
E.
(output)
1.
4-3
95 97
82
71
65
154
89
61
236
160
126
4-3
2.
12
95 97
( 4-4)( 4-5)
32
4-4
95 97
()
95
96
97
600(23%)
186( 7%)
117( 5%)
1,358(52%)
871(35%)
513(24%) 2,742(37%)
63( 2%)
68( 3%)
69( 3%)
200( 3%)
35( 1%)
35( 1%)
18( 1%)
88( 1%)
63( 2%)
55( 2%)
71( 3%)
189( 3%)
74( 3%)
44( 2%)
45( 2%)
163( 2%)
11( 0%)
6( 0%)
3( 0%)
20( 0%)
11( 0%)
22( 1%)
6( 0%)
39( 1%)
140( 5%)
48( 2%)
68( 3%)
256( 3%)
42( 2%)
44( 2%)
86( 1%)
263(10%)
350(14%)
288(13%)
901(12%)
13( 0%)
790(31%)
940(43%) 1,743(24%)
2,631
2,517
2,182
903(12%)
7,330
4-4
33
4-5
3.
4-6 95 97
95
96
97
58 52 70
40 27 36
52%
69%
49 70
70%
24 50
49%
34
4-6 95 97 ()
95
96
97
6
36
40%
12
90%
() () E
19 75
76% 100%
95
100% 71%
76
90%
85%
57
70%
71%
72
73% 90%
66
76%
100
80
70
86%
100
80%
45
86 100% 100%
39 78%
7 9
5-6
1-2
12-15
7 9
1-2
95 334 96 463
97 460 (
96 12-15
35
15 1-2
)
4.()
65 23 31
15 12 95-97
4-7
95-97
95
96
97
2,150()
1,806()
1,803()
179()
151()
150()
()
()
4-8
95-97
10
11
12
95
196
198
193
192
179
177
181
170
173
160
165
166
2150()
96
163
155
155
154
144
163
161
146
142
146
135
142
1806()
97
147
145
154
166
176
171
157
155
159
132
126
115
1803()
36
4-9 95
1
3
0
62
95.40%
1
1
62
95.40%
2
3
60
92.30%
59
90.80%
56
86.20%
55
84.60%
55
84.60%
52
80.00%
53
81.50%
10
11
1
3
4
1
50
52
76.90%
80.00%
12
53
81.50%
20
1.7
26
2.2
669
55.75
85.80%
85.77%
4-2
95
37
4-10
96
3
0
3
3
53
50
81.50%
76.90%
51
78.50%
51
78.50%
48
73.80%
50
76.90%
51
78.50%
47
72.30%
45
69.20%
10
11
7
2
3
4
49
47
75.40%
72.30%
12
49
75.40%
/
/
30
2.5
34
2.8
591
49.25
75.80%
75.77%
4-3
96
38
4-11
97
5
3
3
3
51
51
78.50%
78.50%
55
84.60%
58
89.20%
61
93.80%
59
90.80%
54
83.10%
54
83.10%
55
84.60%
10
11
0
2
10
7
45
40
69.20%
61.50%
12
38
58.50%
25
2.1
36
3
621
51.75
79.60%
79.62%
4-4
97
39
95
4-5
95
96
4-6
96
40
97
4-7
97
41
(1) 95-97
4-8
95-97
42
(2) 95-97
4-9
95-97
43
(3) 95-97
97
4-10
95-97
44
(4) 95-97
97 10
95-97
4-11
5.
4-12
4-12
95
621,280
45
96
97
351,000
318,500
107,945
155,330
458,945
473,830
(outcome)
1.
95 97 96
(1)
(2)
46
(3)
(4)
47
(5)
(6)
48
(7)
2.
94 96
97 1 10
4-13
97.3.29
97
24
50%
97.4.12
39
78%
85%
97.5-8
75
100%
90%
49
4-13
97 ()
97.5.4
90%
71%
97.8.30
45
-31
97.7-9
100%
89%
12
90%
90%
97.10.26
70
86%
90%
3.
4-14
(
)
50
4-14
959697
95
96
97
()
13(45%)
19(54%)
12(34%)
44(44%)
()
4(14%)
3( 9%)
10(29%)
17(17%)
()
4(14%)
4(11%)
5(14%)
13(13%)
()
3(10%)
5(14%)
4(11%)
12(12%)
()
5(17%)
4(11%)
4(11%)
13(13%)
29
35
35
99
(cost-efficiency)
(1)
(2)
4-15
()
95-97
95
96
97
2,070,972
2,070,972
2,100,000
2,631
787.14
2,517
822.79
2,182
962.42
(1)
51
(2)
4-16
()
95-97
95
96
97
238,400
238,400
350,000
334
713.77
463
514.90
460
760.87
(1)()
(2)
4-17
()
95-97
95
96
97
2,182,417
4,029,080
5,008,270
2,150
1015.08
1,806
2230.94
1,803
2777.74
(cost-effectiveness)
(1)()
(2)
4-18
95-97
95
96
97
2,182,417
4,029,080
5,008,270
7
311,773.86
9
447,675.56
9
556,474.44
52
1.
(A1)
(A2)
2.
(A1)
53
(A1)
3.
(A1)
4.
(A2)
5.
(A2)
6.
54
(A1)
7.
(A1)
8.
(A1)
(A2)
55
9.
(A2)
1.
(B1)
(B3)
(B4)
(B5)
12/25
()(B8)
ok
(B10)
56
(B11)
8 5.6
(B12)
(B5)
(B5)
12/25
()(B8)
(B9)
(B11)
57
(B4)
(B6)
(B7)
(B9)
2.
(B3)
(B6)
(B7)
(B8)
58
(B10)
(B11)
(B4)
(B12)
(B1)
(B8)
(B10)
59
(B11)
(B4)
(B9)
(B6)
(B5)
3.
60
(B1)
(B6)
(B4)
(B8)
(B9)
(B3)
(B10)
()
() (B11)
61
(B5)
(B7)
40 (B12)
4.
(B1)
(B3)
(B4)
(B5)
62
(B6)
(B7)
(B8)
(B12)
(B10)
(B11)
5.
(B1)
63
(B10)
(B11)
(B3)
(B8)
(B7)
(B9)
64
(B4)
(B5)
(B6)
11
(B12)
6.
(B1)
(B10)
(B11)
65
(B3)
12
(B4)
(B5)
(B6)
(B7)
(B9)
(B12)
66
7.
(B5)
(B6)
(B7)
(B8)
(B10)
67
(B1)
(B4)
(B9)
(B11)
68
ok
(B12)
(B3)
(B4)
69
()
1.
12
95 97 2,631 2,182
1,358 531
97
95 787
96 823 97 962
2.
95 334 96 463
97 460
95
70
97
()
95 179 96 151 97
150 95
62%97 90% 95 97
13 (13%)
12 (12%)
95
96 97
( 4-18)
()
71
()
()
()
72
()
()
()
73
()
74
75
benefit in-kind
76
benefit in-cash
(utilitarianism)
Voucher
1970s-1980s
Experimental Housing Allowance Program, EHAP
12 30,000
1,800
10% 25%
77
78
79
80
()
(2009)
(1989)
129-200
(1999)
2004
(2005)
(2004)
(2002)
(1996)
(2002)
(2001)
2003
2(4
53-82
1992
(1992)
2003
2(4)146-154
(2002)
81
(2006)
198711121-153
(2006)
(2007)
(2008)
(2009)
(1995)
1992341-58
1995
(1996)2
227-271
(1996)
1999
1357-98
(2007)
(2000)
(2005)-
(2002) 300
(1999)
82
(2008)
(2006)14
25-62
(2003)
(1992)
(1993)
(2004)-
(2002)
(2005)
(2003)
(2004)
1995
2002
5013-20
1999
1111-147
(2008) 121
(1996) 1990
171-30
Kettner, P. M., Moroney, R. M., & Martin, L. L. (1997/2003). Designing
and Managing Programs. 2003
()
Ammons, David N. (1996). Municipal Benchmark: Assessing Local Performance
and Establishing Community Standards. Thousand Oaks, Calif:Sage.
Cederblom, D. (1982). The Performance Appraisal Interview: A
Review,Implications, and Suggestions. Academy of Management
Review,7,2,pp.219-227.
Clampet-Lundquist, S.(2003). Finding and Keeping affordable housing:
Analyzing the experiences of single-mother families in North
Philadelphia. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 30(4): 123-140.
Drucker, P. F. (1973). Management: tasks, responsibilities practices. NY:
Harper & Row.
Estrada, F & Nilsson, A.(2004). Exposure to threatening and violent
behavior among single mother: The significance of lifestyle,
neighborhood and welfare situation. British Journal of Criminology,
44(2): 168-187.
Gilbert Terrell1998. Dimension of Social Welfare Policy4th,
NJPrentice-Hall, pp. 50-82.
Rank, Mark R. &
()
http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.asp
http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm
http://www.moi.gov.tw/dsa/
http://social.tncg.gov.tw/woman_t.jsp?id=1148440242919
http://www.pthg.gov.tw/planjdp/News_Detail.aspx?ID=15143
http://cabu.kcg.gov.tw/Report/ReportTypeFile.aspx?menuid=183&id=9
6&year=-1&month=-1&index=8
85
86 12 15 4 6 42
90 1 10 5 6 3
90 3 19 2227
95 11 1 6 8 36
86
87
88
89
1.
18
18
(1)
(2) 18,395 93
(3) 35
(4)
(5)
(6)
2.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 3 X
(5)
3.
4.
10
5.
90
1.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(1)
(2) 2.5
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
2.
(1)
(2)
(3) x
(4)
(5)
3.
91
4.
( X
)
5.
3,500-4,500
1.
18
18
(1)
(2)
(3)
2.5
5
2.
(1)
(2) 3
(3)
(4)
(5) 3 X
(6)
3.
4.
5.
1000 2600
92
()
1.
1
2
3
4
5
2.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
3.
4.
5.
2000
93
()
1.
6
1
18
(1)
(2) 2.5
(3) 35
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
2.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
3.
4.
( X
)
5.
4000
94
(98 3 )
1.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
2.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
3.
4.
5.
()
95
0910083131
1.
2.
3.
1
2
3
4
5
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
96
1.
2.
3.
4.
97
()
1.
2.
3.
1
2
3
4
5
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
98
1.
97
98
99
100
2.
1.
()
1.
2.
3.
1.
1.
2.
99
1.
()
98 12
31
1.
()
1.
2.
1.
()
97
98
1.
100
2.
3.
4.
(1)
a.
99
1.
2.
1. 99 12
31
1.(
)
2.
)
1.(
)
2.
(
100
97 12
31
97 12
31
1.(
)
2.
b.
(2)
a.
b.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
101
)
1.(
)
1.(
)
1.(
)
2.(
)
1.100
12
31
2.
1.( 100
)
12 31
2.(
)
c.
d.
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
1.
2.
3.
1.
102
1.(
)
2.
()
1.100
12
31
2.
101
3.
1.
1.(
)
2.(
)
1.100
12
31
2.
101
2.
e.
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
103
2.
3.
4.
4
3.
1.( 1.100
f.
2.
2.
1.
)
12
2.( 31
)
2.
1.
2.
1.
1.(
)
2.
(
)
104
1.100
12
31
2.
101
g.
2.
1.
2.
3.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
105
3.
(
)
1.100
12
31 2.
5.
6.
(
)
1.( 97 12
)
31
1.( 98 12
)
31
2.
()
106
7.
8.
9.
1.( 98 12
)
31
1.(
)
2.
()
1.(
)
2.
()
100
12 31
1.100
12
31
2.
1.
97
98
99
100
2.
1. 1.
- 4 3 (
)
2.
3.
1.
()
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
(
107
1.
()
2.
()
4.
1.
()
2.
()
1.100
12
31
2.
3.
(
)
1.
97
98
99
100
2.
1. 1.
2.
(
2.
1.
()
1.98
12 31
2.
108
97
98
99
100
1.
(
)
2.
1.
2.
1.
()
2.
(
)
97 12
31
1.
()
97 12
31
1.
2.
1.
(
1.
97
98
1.
99
100
109
1.100
12 31
2.
)
1.
()
110
2.
1.
97
98
99
100
2.
1.
1.
()
2.
1. 1. 1.
1.
30,000 30,000
2. 2.
30,000
30,000
5,000 5,000 2. 2. (
3. 3.
3.
3.
48,000
60,000
2.
1.(
)
2.
111
1.
2.
97 12
31
3.
4.
1.(
)
2.
()
1.(
)
100
12 31
1.
2.
97
98
99
100
1.
2.
1.
()
2.
()
1.
()
2.
()
112
1.98
12 31
2.
98 12
31
3.
(
)
(
)
1.
()
2.
()
98 12
31
97
98
99
()
2.
1.
100
1.
2.
1. 97 12
() 31
1.
()
2.
113
98 12
31
3.
()
(
)
()
()
4.
()
1.
()
2.
)
1.
()
97 12
31
97 12
31
97
98
99
114
100 1.
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
2.
1.
()
1.
2.
1.
()
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
()
97
98
99
115
100
97 12
31
(
)
116
97
98
99
1.
100
1.
()
2.
2.
1.
2.()
()
3.
117
1.
2.
1.
(
97 12
31
1.
()
2.
()
1.
()
4.
5.
6.
7.
2.
(
1.
2.
()
8.
()
(
)
1.100
12 31
2.
1.
(
)
2.
()
1.98
12 31
2.
1.
()
2.
()
1.
(
)
2.
(
)
1.99
12 31
2.
1.
(
2.
()
1.
2.
118
9.
10.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
()
97 12
31
1.
()
2.
()
97
1.(
)
()
2.(
)
98
99
100
369
1.
2.
1.
()
2.
()
1.
119
()
()
3.(
)
4.(
)
5.
()
6.
2.
()
1.
2.
()
1.
2.
()
1.
)
2.
()
94 3 7 1.
()
94 5 9
7.
1.
()
2.
()
8.
1. 1.
()
2.
2.
(
)
120
97 12
31
97
2.
()
(
)
1.
98
99
100
1.
2.
1.
(
)
1.99
12 31
2.
1.
98 12
()
31
2.
()
121
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
122