Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ABSTRACT: Buckling instability is one of the more destructive forms of pile failure. Buckling of piles
can be classified into two groups; (a) Global buckling, where a part or full length deforms longitudinally
as in Eulers buckling of unsupported struts; (b) Local buckling where the cross-section of the pile deforms
and the damage is localised. Global buckling is currently considered in design where piles are partially
exposed or driven in extremely soft soil or during installation under driving stresses. Recent studies have
shown that fully embedded end-bearing piles passing through saturated loose to medium dense sand can
buckle if the surrounding soil liquefies in an earthquake. There have been a number of cases where offshore
piles have collapsed during driving due to progressive closure of the internal dimensions the initiating mechanism being local buckling. This paper summarizes the different cases where buckling should be
considered in pile design. Mechanisms of collapse of offshore piles by local buckling are discussed in a
companion paper.
1
1.1
1.2
INTRODUCTION
Buckling as a mode of failure
815
This section of the paper reviews the design guidelines against buckling of piles in some of the most
used codes of practice.
2.1
1.4
2.2
1.3
816
API (2000) considers stresses in a pile during driving. The code advises designers to have a minimum
pile wall thickness to avoid local buckling. The recommendations are:
For piles that are to be installed by driving where
sustained hard driving is anticipated, the minimum
piling wall thickness used should not be less than
3
3.1
(1)
(2)
where
t wall thickness in mm,
D diameter, in mm.
2.3
Figure 2.
where
EI Flexural rigidity of the pile;
P0 External axial compressive force applied at
the top of the pile i.e. x 0
f(x) is the friction per unit length
k(x) is the modulus of subgrade reaction.
The above equation suggests that if part of the soil
surrounding the pile loses its effective stress, then
f(x) 0 and k(x) will be near zero, and the equation
reduces to Eulers buckling equation. The theoretical
buckling load can be estimated by equation 3.
(3)
where Leff Effective length of the pile in the unsupported zone. This depends of the boundary condition
of the pile below and above the support loss zone, see
Bhattacharya et al. (2004).
3.2
817
(4)
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
818
Figure 7.
819
0.8
0.7
(rmin) m
0.6
Good
performance
0.5
Poor
performance
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
Figure 8.
(2004).
10
20
30
Effective length (Leff) m
40
50
Concrete pile
Steel tubular pile
1.25
1
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
4
8
10
12
14
16
18
Thickness of liquefiable layer (m)
20
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
Aldridge, T.R, Carrington, T.M and Kee, N.R. 2005.
Propagation of pile tip damage during installation,
Proceedings of ISFOG 2005, Australia.
API 2000. Recommended practice for Planning, Designing
and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms Working
Stress Design. American Petroleum Institute.
Bhattacharya, S. 2003. Pile instability during earthquake
liquefaction, PhD Thesis; University of Cambridge (U.K).
Bhattacharya, S., Madabhushi, S.P.G and Bolton, M.D.
2004. An alternative mechanism of pile failure in liquefiable deposits during earthquakes, Geotechnique 54,
No 3, pp 203213.
Bhattacharya and Tokimatsu 2004. Essential criteria for design
of piled foundations in seismically liquefiable areas,
Proceedings of the 39th Japan National Conference on
Geotechnical Engineering, Niigata, 7th to 9th July 2004.
Bond, A.J. 1989. Behavior of displacement piles in overconsolidated clays, PhD Thesis, Imperial College (U.K).
820
Heelis, M.E., Pavlovic, M.N. and West, R.P. 2004. The analytical prediction of the buckling loads of fully and partially embedded piles, Geotechnique 54, No 6, pp 363373.
McRobie, A. 2002. Buckling and stability, Undergraduate
lecture notes; University of Cambridge (U.K).
Rankine, W.J.M. 1866. Useful rules and tables, London.
Sovinc, I. 1981. Buckling of piles with initial curvature,
Proc of the International Conference on soil mechanics
and foundation engineering, Volume 8, pp 851855.
JRA 1996. Japanese Road Association, Specification for
Highway Bridges, Part 5, Seismic Design.
Rankine, W.J.M. 1866. Useful rules and tables, London.
Horne, M.R and Merchant, W. 1965. The Stability of Frames,
Pergamon.
821