Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
article
info
Article history:
Received 11 May 2010
Accepted 4 October 2010
Keywords:
Steel connections
Slip-critical bolted connections
Bolted bearing connections
Filler plates
abstract
This paper reports the results of sixteen experiments of bolted slip-critical connections with fillers. Fifteen
of the connections used oversized holes and one connection used standard holes. Such connections with
oversized holes are commonly fabricated for use with structures such as long-span trusses, since the
use of oversized holes allows erection in-place rather than first assessing fit-up on the ground. Filler
plates are used to connect members of different depths or widths. The sixteen experiments reported
herein highlight the behavior of bolted steel connections with oversized holes in which fillers are
included and are undeveloped, partially developed, or fully developed. Both single-ply and multi-ply
fillers are investigated, as are welded developed fillers, and specimens fabricated using either turn-ofthe-nut or tension control bolts to pretension the connection. The results augmented with previous
literature document the slip and shear strengths of these connections, propose formulas for assessing
these strengths for the different conditions investigated, and provide recommendations for design of these
types of connections.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Filler plates are used in bolted steel connections where hotrolled structural steel members of different depths are joined. Filler
plates are commonly found in long-span truss connections, steel
girder splices, and column splices. Typical filler plate thicknesses
range from 6 to 102 mm (1/4 to 4 in.) or larger. For long-span
trusses in particular, recent fabrication and erection practices have
favored the use of oversized holes in connections with fillers so
that the trusses may be erected in place without first checking
fit-up through a trial erection on the ground. Previous work has
concentrated on the behavior of connections with filler plates
thinner than 25 mm (1 in.). The 2005 Specification for Structural
Steel Buildings of the American Institute of Steel Construction
(AISC) [1] accounts for fillers in Section J5 by requiring a reduction
in the bolt shear strength, a requirement that the connection be
designed as slip-critical at strength load levels, or development
of the filler (or, equivalently, extension of the connection splice
plate to include bolts sufficient to develop the filler). Fillers are
considered developed when an additional number of bolts or
equivalent welds are provided to enable a more uniform stress
distribution throughout the combined section of the connecting
380
Table 1
Specimen test matrix.
Specimen name
Upper column
Development
730-std
730-over
159f
159h
159n1
159n2
455f
455h
455n1
455n2
159n-2ply1
159n-2ply2
159h-TC
159n-TC
159f-weld
159h-weld
W14 730
W14 730
W14 159
W14 159
W14 159
W14 159
W14 455
W14 455
W14 455
W14 455
W14 159
W14 159
W14 159
W14 159
W14 159
W14 159
Undeveloped
Undeveloped
Fully developed: 4 bolt rows
Half developed: 2 bolt rows
Undeveloped
Undeveloped
Fully developed: 2 bolt rows
Half developed: 1 bolt row
Undeveloped
Undeveloped
Undeveloped
Undeveloped
Half developed: 2 bolt rows
Undeveloped
Fully developed: 406 mm (16 in.) of 13 mm (1/2 in.) fillet weld per edge of filler
Half developed: 330 mm (13 in.) of 8 mm (5/16 in.) fillet weld per edge of filler
W14 730. The top column was a W14 159, W14 455, or
W14 730. The W14 159 and W14 455 top column specimens
required a filler plate of 95 mm (3 3/4 in.) and 41 mm (1 5/8 in.)
respectively. All surfaces of the specimens were blasted to a Class
B surface using a compressed air nozzle and G40 (type GL) steel
grit size steel shot. The resulting surface profile met SSPC-SP6 [12]
and measured 3.57 mils with a 0.43 mil standard deviation using
pressofilm tape. Two specimens (159n-2ply1 and 159-2ply2) were
tested with two undeveloped filler plates consisting of an 89 mm
(3 1/2 in.) and a 6 mm (1/4 in.) plate placed back-to-back, rather
than a single filler plate that was 95 mm (3 3/4 in.) thick, as
was used for the other W14 159 specimens. Two specimens
(159h-TC and 159n-TC) utilized ASTM F2280 Twist-Off tension
control structural bolts [13]. The remaining specimens utilized
ASTM A490 [14] structural bolts pretensioned using the turnof-nut method. For two specimens (159f-weld and 159h-weld)
the development was achieved by a fillet weld, instead of bolts,
between the filler plate and top column at each flange tip.
The splice plates were connected to the top and bottom
columns with twenty-four and sixty-four 229 mm (9 in.) long
bolts, respectively. Up to as many as sixteen 178 mm (7 in.) long
additional development bolts connected the filler plate to the
top column. The top column was assembled in a negative bearing
condition to provide the opportunity for the maximum possible
slip within the bolt holes between the top column, the filler
plate(s), and the splice plate. The bottom column was assembled
in a bearing condition between the column and splice plate to
effectively eliminate the possibility of slip in this location. All
bolts were 29 mm (1 1/8 in.) diameter with the threads excluded
from the shear plane. For the A490 bolts, the elongation of four
control bolts was monitored and if necessary re-torqued along
with neighboring bolts [10]. The bolt holes were oversized by
8 mm (5/16 in.) to a diameter of 37 mm (1 7/16 in.) for 15 of
the specimens; the bolt holes of the remaining specimen (730-std)
were standard [30 mm (1 3/16 in.) diameter]. An 89 mm (3 1/2 in.)
gap was provided between the top and bottom columns to allow
for movement between the columns.
The filler was designated as undeveloped, half developed,
or fully developed. Development was achieved using additional
178 mm (7 in.) long bolts or fillet welds between the filler plate
and top column. Full development was determined as the number
of bolts through the filler needed to uniformly distribute the load of
the connection across the filler plates and flange of the top column,
rounded to a whole number of bolt rows. For example, for the
specimens with W14 455 top columns [82 mm (3.21 in.) thick
flanges with 41 mm (1.625 in.) thick filler plates], the required
number of bolt rows for full development was 2 [e.g., (6 bolt rows)
(41 mm)/(82 + 41 mm)]. Half development was achieved using
381
half of the number of bolt rows required for full development. Fillet
welds with strength equivalent to the slip strength of the bolts
was used to develop specimens 159f-weld and 159h-weld. If the
specimen was undeveloped no bolts were provided between the
filler plate and the top column. The specimens were instrumented
with strain gages on each component as shown in Fig. 2. With
the exception of the gages on the filler plates, the strain gages
were placed symmetrically about the strong and weak axes of the
columns. On the south side, seven strain gages were placed in a row
across the filler plate near the top edge of the splice plate (shown in
gray in Fig. 2). Strain gages were only applied to the filler plate if it
was developed by bolts. Several strain gages were damaged during
382
Tb , pretension kN (kips)
Fv , shear strength MPa (ksi)
Fu , tensile strength MPa (ksi)
503 (113)
703 (102)
1103 (160)
512 (115)
683 (99)
1158 (168)
a
717 (104)
1186 (172)
a
745 (108)
1241 (180)
383
Table 3
Ancillary slip test matrix.
Specimen number
Outside plates
6B-3
Thickness
Splice
51 mm (2 in.)
6C-1
6C-2
6C-3
Splice
6D-2
W14 730
Inside plates
Type
51 mm (2 in.)
Type
Thickness
Filler
41 mm (1 5/8 in.)
0.435
Filler
95 mm (3 3/4 in.)
0.58
0.55
0.445
Splice
51 mm (2 in.)
0.445
7B-1
7B-2
7B-3
W14 159
30 mm (1 3/16 in.)
Filler
89 mm (3 1/2 in.)
0.33
0.5
0.365
7C-1
7C-2
7C-3
W14 159
30 mm (1 3/16 in.)
Filler
95 mm (3 3/4 in.)
0.49
0.52
0.45
7D-1
7D-2
7D-3
W14 455
81 mm (3 3/16 in.)
Filler
41 mm (1 5/8 in.)
0.43
0.405
0.45
Average
Standard deviation
Coefficient of variation
0.46
0.07
0.15
10000
10000
8000
8000
Load (kN)
Load (kN)
6000
6000
4000
4000
2000
2000
08top-1e
08top-1w
0
0
10
20
30
Time (min)
10
20
30
40
4. Specimen behavior
The typical response of a typical specimen, including both load
versus time and load versus the displacement of the base of the
top column is shown in Fig. 4. Prior to slip, the loaddisplacement
relation exhibited elastic behavior, indicated by the stiff linear
response. Upon reaching the slip load, there was a sudden increase
in displacement, corresponding to the slip of at least one of the
faying surfaces (Fig. 5(a)). Since the machine could not maintain
force during this dynamic action (because the hydraulic oil volume
required time to restabilize), the load decreased after slip. As
the load was stabilized, slip continued. The load stabilization
typically took approximately 30 s, during which the specimens
often experienced additional slip events over a period of several
or tens of seconds following the initial event. The expected total
slip was twice the difference between the hole diameter and the
bolts shank diameter [3 mm (0.125 in.) for standard holes, 16 mm
(0.625 in.) for oversize holes], after which the bolts would be
expected to come into a bearing condition. Evidence of this is
seen in Fig. 4(b), indicated by a noticeable increase in stiffness
of the connection. As the load was further applied, the bearing
surfaces began to yield in compression and bolts began to yield
in shear, lowering the stiffness of the specimen. Ultimately, all
of the bolts going through the splice plate on one side of the
384
385
Table 4
Slip strength experimental test results.
Name
Test kN (kips)
Pn kN (kips)a
Predicted kN (kips)
Test-to-predicted ratio
730-std
730-over
159f
159h
159n1
159n2
455f
455h
455n1
455n2
159n-2ply1
159n-2ply2
159h-TC
159n-TC
159f-weld
159h-weld
7549 (1697)
7268 (1634)
5445 (1224)
7549 (1697)
8358 (1879)
7580 (1704)
6090 (1369)
5227 (1175)
6174 (1388)
6374 (1433)
2927 (658)
5996 (1348)
7233 (1626)
5738 (1290)
7495 (1685)
7188 (1616)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
4102 (922)
5649 (1270)
5649 (1270)
5649 (1270)
5649 (1270)
5649 (1270)
5649 (1270)
5649 (1270)
5649 (1270)
5649 (1270)
5649 (1270)
5649 (1270)
5649 (1270)
b
b
5649 (1270)
5649 (1270)
1.34
1.29
0.96
1.34
1.48
1.34
1.08
0.93
1.09
1.13
0.52
1.06
1.33
1.27
Average
Std. dev.
6512 (1464)
1317 (296)
a
b
1.15
0.25
Table 5
Slip strength test-to-predicted ratio by specimen type.
Specimen type
Number of specimens
Standard deviation
All
No filler
1 ply filler
2 ply filler
No development
1 ply filler, no development
1 ply filler, half and full development
1 ply filler, full development
14
2
10
2
6
4
6
3
1.15
1.31
1.19
0.79
1.10
1.26
1.15
1.12
0.25
0.04
0.18
0.38
0.33
0.18
0.19
0.19
Table 6
Recommended multi-ply reduction factor for slip-critical connections with fillers.
Reduction factor
1.0
0.90a
0.80
0.70
1.4
Slip Test-to-Predicted Ratio
1.6
1.2
1.0
y = -0.11x + 1.00
R2 = 0.17
0.8
Bo rello,
Denavit &
Hajjar
Linear (All
Authors)
0.6
0.4
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
Number of Plies
The results from this study for the ultimate shear strength
test-to-predicted ratio versus filler thickness are combined with
the results from Frank and Yura [4] studies in Fig. 9, including
specimens without fillers and specimens with undeveloped singleply fillers. The bolt shear strength decreases as a function of
filler thickness for relatively thin fillers, but this reduction is
mitigated by having sufficiently large fillers, approximately 25 mm
(1 in.) or greater. The bolt shear strength reduction formula of
Section J5 of 2005 AISC [1] and two proposed reduction equations
(obtained from regression analyses based on single-ply fillers)
are also superimposed in Fig. 9. The two proposed equations are
identified as Reduction Equations (A) and (B), given by Eqs. (1) and
(2) respectively, where t is the thickness of the filler in millimeters
(or inches). To account for the presence of single-ply fillers the
bolt shear strength of the connection is then multiplied by the
386
Table 7
Shear strength experimental test results.
Name
Test kN (kips)
Pn kN (kips)a
Predicted kN (kips)
Test-to-predicted ratio
730-std
730-over
159f
159h
159n1
159n2
455f
455h
455n1
455n2
159n-2ply1
159n-2ply2
159h-TCb
159n-TCb
159f-weldc
159h-weld
11,307 (2542)
10,938 (2459)
11,761 (2644)
12,931 (2907)
11,334 (2548)
11,637 (2616)
10,800 (2428)
9773 (2197)
9737 (2189)
10,000 (2248)
12,513 (2813)
13,038 (2931)
>13,345 (>3000)
>13,345 (>3000)
>12,099 (>2720)
12,250 (2754)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
5968 (1342)
10,871 (2444)
10,871 (2444)
10,871 (2444)
10,871 (2444)
10,871 (2444)
10,871 (2444)
10,871 (2444)
10,871 (2444)
10,871 (2444)
10,871 (2444)
10,871 (2444)
10,871 (2444)
11,503 (2586)
11,503 (2586)
10,871 (2444)
10,871 (2444)
1.04
1.01
1.08
1.19
1.04
1.07
0.99
0.90
0.90
0.92
1.15
1.20
>1.16
>1.16
>1.10
1.13
Average
Std. Dev.
>11,386 (>2560)
>1123 (>252)
a
b
c
>1.07
>0.10
reduction factor :
(SI )
(2)
(US )
(SI )
(US )
1.2
= 1 0.0154(t 6) 0.8
= 1 0.4(t 0.25) 0.8
1.4
(1)
1.0
Lee & Fisher
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
(3)
20
40
60
80
100
4
Number of Tests
1 0.0051t
t 25 mm
=
0.87 + 0.0031(t 25) 25 mm < t 67 mm
1 0.13t
t 1 in.
=
0.87 + 0.08(t 1) 1 in. < t 2.625 in.
Standard
Oversize
0
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
since one of the plies was significantly thicker than the other, the
behavior of the connection was likely dominated by the thicker ply.
The fillers with three equal plies in the study by Frank and Yura [4]
exhibited an average shear strength 14% lower than predicted. The
mechanism associated with connection behavior and the influence
of multiple-ply fillers is explored in [10,11]. It is shown that the
shear strength of a connection may be reduced for connections
1.05
Borello,
Denavit, &
Hajjar
Test-to-Predicted Ratio
1.00
Reduction
Equation A
0.95
Reduction
Equation B
0.90
2005 AISC
(F&Y)
0.85
2005 AISC
(F&Y) with 0.85
Cap
0.80
0.75
0
20
40
60
80
100
with fillers with greater than one ply to attain the best accuracy
in the test-to-predicted ratios, but that the value of the reduction
is modest (0.95 for two and three plies) and can likely be neglected
for design.
A direct comparison between different levels of development
in bolted connections is seen in this test series. For the specimens
with a W14 455 top column, a trend is seen in the effect
of development on the bolt shear strength. The fully developed
specimen, 455f, achieved 99% of its predicted shear strength while
the less than fully developed specimens, 455n1, 455n2, and 455h,
achieved 90%, 92% and 90% of their predicted shear strengths,
respectively. This data indicates that a connection with developed
fillers may not suffer the same detrimental effects in shear as
one with undeveloped fillers. It is seen in Table 7 that specimens
159f, 159h, 159f-weld, and 159h-weld achieved slightly higher
shear strengths than specimens 159n1 and 159n2. However,
the series of tests with a W14 159 top column all achieved
higher than predicted shear strengths, limiting the applicability
of a comparison based on development. Another option is to
consider part of the connection as effectively developing the rest
of the connection, dividing some of the bolts into development
bolts and connection bolts. A detailed analysis of developed and
undeveloped connections is outlined in [10].
7. Conclusions
The research presented in this paper and summarized in
detail in [10], augmented by previous studies from the literature,
demonstrates definitive trends regarding the influence of filler
plates on the slip and shear strengths of bolted connections,
including:
387
388
[9] Kanda K, Uemura A, Mori T. Slip resistance of high strength bolted single
friction joints with filler plates. Journal of Constructional Steel 2006;14:
63946 [in Japanese].
[10] Borello DJ, Denavit MD, Hajjar JF. Behavior of bolted steel slip-critical
connections with fillers. Report no. NSEL-017. Newmark structural laboratory
report series. Urbana (IL): Department of Civil and Enviromental Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2009.
[11] Denavit MD, Borello DJ, Hajjar JF. Bolted steel slip-critical connections with
fillers: II. Behavior. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2011;67(3):
398406.
[12] The Society for Protective Coatings (SSPC). SSPC-SP 6/NACE no. 3: commercial
blast cleaning. Pittsburgh (PA): SSPC; 2007.
[13] American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM). Designation F2280-06:
standard specification for twist off type tension control structural
bolt/nut/washer assemblies, steel, heat treated, 150 ksi minimum 50 tensile
strength. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2006.
[14] American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM). Designation A490-04: standard
specification for structural bolts, alloy steel, 53 heat treated, 150 ksi minimum
tensile strength. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2004.
[15] Kulak GL, Fisher JW, Struik JHA. Guide to design criteria for bolted and riveted
joints. 2nd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2001.
[16] Wallaert JJ, Fisher JW. Shear strength of high-strength bolts. Journal of the
Structural Division, ASCE 1965;91(ST3):99125.
[17] American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM). Designation A992/A992M-04:
standard specification for structural steel shapes. West Conshohocken (PA):
ASTM International; 2004.
[18] American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM). Designation A572/A572M04: standard specification for high-strength low-alloy columbium-vanadium
structural steel. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2004.
[19] American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM). Designation F60606: standard
test methods for determining the mechanical properties of externally and
internally threaded fasters, washers, direct tension indicators, and rivets. West
Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2006.
[20] Research Council on Structural Connections (RCSC). Specification for structural
joints using ASTM A325 or A490 bolts. Chicago (IL): RCSC; June 2004.
[21] Grondin G, Jin M, Josi G. Slip critical bolted connectiona reliability analysis for
design at the ultimate limit state. The American Institute of Steel Construction.
Edmonton (AB, Canada): Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
University of Alberta; April 2008.