Filed Grand Jury Petition May 19Th 2015

~[)L5nl~dP
FILED
"
15
MAY 19 P 1 :08
CRLt
ro
,.'-I -~
n uJ:'
01(' - -
BY
I,-S!Y,!;
-----~-
IN THE DISTRICTCOURTOF CRAWFORDcOtJt#ff~~
~1"11
..~
IN THE MATTER OF THE
GRAND JURV
PETITION
Jeffry Jack,
Lori Fleming,
Kurtis Loy, Oliver Lynch, Robert Fleming, A.J. Wachter
GRAND JURY PETITION TO INVESTIGATE, DISQUALIFY, AND

OUST ALL ABOVE 11m JUDICI~L DISTRICT JUDGES.
WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND AN ETHICAL, FAIR, AND IMPARTIAL JUDICIARY.
Case No.
K.S.A. Chapter 60
GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICTCOURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS
of
The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing
this
Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges** and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11th District local rule that bars all
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE in the judiciary when judges act at times in a mariner that does NOT promote public
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
ttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
I
Signature
tJ:~/~ __
:J;,J'e...
fl.
2 I \t\r~
~J
Address
Print Name
i...--1...-
.-v
'"
1"v1 ;If 1--1-
VI4AA---
/Yl/~
U/olv~,,-lJtJ-u
o.;
r\A
ICeL/I.>. !A
'L~~
6.
S"Jt
a. ttvrt
ISO].AI.
Email Address (Optional)
City/Zip
h,Y\.;ehJt
Mlc,t..'~; ~
('5)"0 J ..A/. /1Il f'c/t
c..
(.
6b76Z
\I;
1M
:-/J q ("
IV)C\ ~
<;;.;,.-.t~./. ",,~
b6 7(2--
J.-.'-
Its'-r~~-
7~
t: e:
""'-'--
(50S
/r/-LI' "'- __ I~
/7 6"7
V\
9f1
/"o-L.;.::; '""'--
(>u~dSt.
vert W.
- """-have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
oa that each of the signers on this petition is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
each signer believes that the statements in this petition are true.
Page
1-
of
l~
*Pursuant to K.S.A 22"':3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
Return Petitions To:

Summary Judgment Group
c/o NO<;lhDay & Eric Muathe
P.O.Box 224
Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762
**AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI 'B. FLEMING
For Questions Call: (417) 434-0083
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED fUDGES.
www.ConflictGate;com
"
"
.>
GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

The undersigned qUalifi~d electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
Petition cause a grand ury to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
1. Hear testimony and i vestigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts f interest between Judges*" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable peoPlei of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11th District local rule that bars all
Judges from hearing t~eir former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE in the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
confiden~e in the ind~!endenCe, integrity, an? i~partiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihid~en conflicts of interests.
~ Guilty Judges I partie attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases VOided,vacated, and reheard.
Uorneys who knowing y practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Address
BLb
t
($00/
P.
Email Address
City/Zip
\<a..v\.')os
(oto1<01.
'fr-.PL J N
f~l1~~
r:1-r')lJxJtC!P
~7t3
~rD'k'eI 707
14~~I'VI"
.. _,;Itt~
c.~~~ So- \,(&J'

"
,/' 1
I'
--\3' nv
,."
1// j.;iJ, \'

f'
/\,..
",j
IU \~1. \-t.V\
I.\H
..~
r{~r~~~
\or
.~~7~lI~~~~~"""),,.J-t-I------I
!-...;\t
\A '~.'..\ C ~
n-\ri',r
f\',), ";:;:\"~
,I
\r" jf ~Ii
';,:'i9
i/t,\l-
T -.
!...
J.
~
5-/.
205 w. Le.'\
L..IZ7
6~\~~
J
,r /{'f
fr
/;y'f~~ / 'I;- t
1,;)j},V'k
UDwi
(Optional)
-tnY\
r:1.eldcY'esf
Qrc've-
I"~
Lf~
11\'
I",'
r-:
i/
),'''' ...
,
~(;7G2-
tro
Y\
-k~c....~ L.l ~3
Ir Msktrq . &
100.5.
~lAsh/Jr
Carrier's Address
City/Zip
{fo 7tD
VJ1t.oL
Email Address
/6'
I,
have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
oath that each of the igner
this petition is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
each signer believes t at the statements in this petition are true.
Page
of ~
*Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
W, TE THE PEOPLE BrUEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES .

I
11

c/o Noah Day & Eric Muathe
P.D.Box 224
For Questions
CaJ/:
(417) 434-0083
www.ConflictGate.com

The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges and attorneys (esP. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE in the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard .
.ttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Iii
Signature
Print Name
foJG..~
u..c:
Address
City/Zip
WCA.-MO\l"-.
lJ~f(
'-fisbv.r
~'7Co;L
Page
of
kB'?
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
Wij THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
,
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
IFor Questions Calf: (417) 434-0083

www judgmentsummary
..
com

The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this'
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judqes'" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
ttorneys Who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Iii
Address
It>O
;202
d15
&irJ~K
2D'Z(!)d#' (MJL
~~
/1f:&?frT-dlt?
lib? w.<~
rlr

P.O.Box224
Page
It- of
~~
*Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
'"

The undersigned
qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned in the County to investiqate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation
of a new
District local rule that bars all
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE
in the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
confidence in the independence,
integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
n"
2. Guilty judges / parties attorneys

ttorneys who knowingly practiced
should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state' income for every such case.
Iii
Signature
Address
Print Name
City/Zip
Qd.
J-/ Pf/t\
{Po r
1l0l6sf-t.h
-b<>1 # CA+A1J~
//3 w
la-\O 5
j
.~
66~6L
Rit~\}1Q \ ~ 61 b
AffJflCt}/ ti b ~
f\
7th
Carrier's
~~L\;:i~_<:"ffi\v N\.. ~\l~
Q-\.~
I,
oath
that
each of the signers
each signer
believes that
, have
on this petition
the statements
I \1.\\0
N\. Nvv~
signed above as the carrier
is the genuine
in this petition
signature
of the person
I EmaH
City/Zip
Address
I \-\~MJ'(Z)bf4 c.,
~t\~\Ei\.Mre
of this petition
whose
and do verify
name it purports
upon the
to be and that
of!t~
*pursuani\to
Petitions
Summary
To:
Judgment
Group
are true.
P.O.Box224
\
Page
Return
Address
K.S.A 22-3001
Pittsburg,
(C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS lOY, OLIVER lYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & lORI B. flEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
ALL PETITIONERS
Kansas, 66762
IFor Questions
Call: (417)434-0083
"
GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY. KANSAS

the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges** and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic contlict of interests.
2. Guilty judqes I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
Itorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
I
Signature
Address
Print Name
tv~rl
City/Zip
&/0
th~
}(5/
'()
qtft SE-
31)11....-
dOO ;(/ c6tJffJe.l{

10
Carrier's Signature
I,
~~
~\Q..;
I ~\~~
1'1\. N\.\.l~W
..~\\E
, have
Carrier's Address
\l-\-\O~N..~~
signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
oath that each of the signers on this petition is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
Page
of ~
*Pursuant
to K.S.A 22~3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**A.J. WACHTER. KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRV JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALiFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.

P.O.Box 224
Pittsburg. Kansas. 66762
For Questions Calf: (417) 434-0083

,
GRAND JURY PETITlON* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges"" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11thDistrict local rule that bars all
2. Guilty jUdges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard .
I
lcs
~D()
10
Carrier' 5 Signature
~
't)\\c-~ ..~\.ll\\WE::::"
/JdLffi
a- ( K '5
Carrier's Name
~\c.., ~.NU.l~
I.
Page
of
J~
Email Address
Summary Judgment
P. O. Box 224
"Pursuant to K.S.A22:3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEF'FRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
.WE TIlE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS

iFor Questions Call: (417) 434-0083
I--------------~-----www.judgmentsummary.com
GRAND JURY PETITION*
TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS
~ttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Signature
~~
1~fY'l~
--,
f0!
---
Address
Print Name
:MI~Lf.nl ,
!.-It/ [
l11p4,A
g(1rn n l\11l
(l,11
4Z/ !
(Optional)
Ptfi5bv (~ / -r: 7(/;;:>. .<Sl\le r-k>\I\~ICdh~~l
~Ac-/25P,,\
1lAck.;""
Email Address
City/Zip
P,' tfSOIJ
--
('\
UJiJ, 7Ct..'d-
3
4
S
6
7
8
q
10
I,
Carrier's Signature
Carrier's Name
Carrier's Address
~(L~~
~\GN\"NUJ~
\ \\'(0 'C1\".\EP<\'8-\~
m\~
City/Zip
I P\\B~\)r-.~t
~,N\u~
V~::,
, have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
Page'
of ~
**A.J. WACH ER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
WE TIlE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
.,
Email Address
P.O.Box224
Pittsburg,
Kansas, 66762
"-

--
--------
----
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges'" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
Attorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Signature
P>nf1~:J~~
(2...{\ o.~
5'\.Ys)/ylO/l
Co\{\(\~
<:.J.:.4~.:
\I
&Pl
1I3f ~ 23ti:/
~f-
~O2 W
J .,
-...J
.<1...
Ce(Qll.Q
~~
sEkz.(, f/
(Optional)
fIIYIt~\~?~1 r'r lA d.eT/u ~ r:r oY)o : 0

\#~6
~ """'
I"""
p, j~~~
/: S/~ md C::.oesfy &:t> Y-~ ~
Q i \1'6 \oLU'" C1. IG-s.
1~D ~pJn(\~ t\~A.a?

, 70CX S_('\n.m)~p..e
I
P.
Sot{ V LUIA-rc=,..
itIJn&#. A
Email Address
City/Zip
3~~~
't 'I t "-~ bA..~
~ ~c. \ /y\p r
~cPr
2/~"/)(l
'"'
Address
Print Name
~~"CldltKS
r. t:. 1 ":l"
~uon~6~~~({;r,
t.
I
r,T1"$ ~r../Yet
6
7
8
'.
10
Carrier's Signature
Carrier's Name
~\c... N\.. ~Mt\t
~~~~
~.Nw~
Q$J
Carrier's Address
\1.+\0 ~~-C~\\~
City/Zip
I ~\\\~~RO--
Email Address
cr-v: ("
I,
have signed above as the carrier ofthis petition and do verify upon the
Page
Cf
of
**A.J. WACH ER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES .
.-

P.O.Box 224

on.
..

The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District CO!Jrtof Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
Iii
Signature
8
9
10
Carrier's Name
Carrier's Signature
mC/
I,
ffi,L-\. M.$~
Email Address
Carrier's Address
\L\-\O ~~r\8\.M;--
I~\~W\.'~\A~
,have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
Page
\{)
**A.J.
of ~
WACHTER,

P.O.Box 224
*Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60~1206(a)
KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY
DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
ALL PETITIONERS


,ttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Ii'
Address
Signature
1.
l/~
-aT?..'-?'AIJ
10/~
iYl-,
S-t-Ir;:...N~~
Th\ Q..;
u--
~lr
I., H~r,
City/Zip
~c.. ~.~.
I,
9 -z."1.
N\.. N\..\) ~
\1
of
1-\:<6
Email Address
I \\\\~ ~\-\tR.\~%(.::; I~~ib\.')"~\qr~

I
Page
/,I.tt l&J
"'*AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORIB. FLEMING
,

Summary
c/o Noah
P. O. Box
Pittsburg,
Judgment
Day & Eric Muathe
224
Kansas, 66762
or Questions Call: (417) 434-0083

www.judgmentsummary.com
GRAND JURY PETITION*'TO
THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD
COUNTY, KANSAS
The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that.the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE in the judiciary when judges act attimes in a manner that does NOT promote public
2. Guilty [udqes / parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office,.moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
I
M~i'"l'~~ 12~'Ode~
r's
1 Carrier's
Slgnatu. re.
~.Q....; ~~
~Q.,
Name
~.
12.351
VJ\'\t!kki~e
I W."h:~A}!'5
5+
I \\\-\0 't,\\\\\::R \tRRM:E::::- I \\t\b'P-,tR,

)J
Carrier's Address
~~
City/Zip
'II
ffi\ ~
I,.
Nt\.. ~~
Page \ ~
of ~
**A.J. WACHTER,
"Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001(C} arid K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH,JEFFRY
JACK, ROBERT FLEMING,
& LORI B. FLEMING
ALL PETITIONERS
Email Address
9-.
P.O.Box 224

I
Signature
Print Name
City/Zip
Address
He~do-.l
-.Camer's Signature.
Q-te....; ~~__
..
J.....
J-eafi.
rier'S. N.ame
~\Q...;~.
NvJ~
I \t\-\Q ~\\l'\~t:R9J\a:::;-Carrier's Address
I~\\~
"1\\ ~
I,
N1\.. ~
Page
\S3
of

P.O.Box 224
WE THE PEOPI_E BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
.----------
ALL PETITIONERS


the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges*"" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open {hidden conflicts of interests.
ttorneyswho knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
I
Address
Print Name
SholJdC:
uto '5- PI
I f{'oy S /ltYlV .~ f
.}J..~oc~t~'\~,~.
?-'O7-
f..\o~.
~
QtIo"'f~T~J
Carrier's Name
Page ~
of
Ltg
**A.J. WACHTER,KURTIS
*Pursuant
t"lOl
t z. ~ n: f1{~
~OVM Q.ov&Q
.r~
Carrier's Address
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
lOY, OLIVER lYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & lORI B. FLEMING
Email Address
P.O.Box224
<,

The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County,'within 60 days after the filing of this
Signature
Print Name
Address
~~ M,0lv.
1+GU1ncU1 mlJ tv! at,$
60 ? IJ
City/Zip
w~
AtJ+ .c2.0
1 ttoL . s ~u.k
~&l~L
f-Zto
,,1cf4 J
T(/,}\A" e,4i""'
rrf:A.~
Emjil Address (Optional)
b' z-16
1J1~~1AIt/5~~/
101rN. 2yt;atlW~
rre-
Sf
fI/f15S
~7&?
0lp(~'~
Carrier's Name
~~
I,
\NJJ~
~\
~Q...,
\'1\.0 ~t)tQ\\e
City/Zip
~~N\,u~
I \1.t\Q~~~'~
. have signed above as the carrier of this
1~~I0~
petition and do verify upon the
Page ~
of
It)$'
*Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
Email Address
Q..--
....

P.O.Box 224
For Questions Co": (417) 434-0083

www.ContlictGate.com

The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new n" District local rule that bars all
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE in the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public"
I
Signature
Address
Print Name
t) ec
hOt
City/Zip
of!-
;..
10 +,
~
\ C)~
~~
.._J
carrle.r's Name
~\c...-~.~~
\J...::)
bci..
Carrier'sAddress
\4-\{)
Q)\\~\c:RVd~f"-"
I,
Ek\\<::"'>~. ~~\\-E
Page
\f>
of ~
*Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a}
..-Return Petitions To:

P.O.Box 224

1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of jUdicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges** and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed { shocking economic conflict of interests.
Iii
Address
Print Name
City/Zip
j .5ML\+rr
I~(jl
ID~ rJ,
70 y
I" b ;62..
Itl (} I,' V-L.
(J 2f tJ '
oj ; J .e.
Carrier's Address
Nl\J~
I \f..\-\G
~~~\~R~
I,
~
\0 N\..N\_\l "'" ~
J1:
Page ...
of
1t-~
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT flEMING,
& :LORI B. FLEMING
,
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALUy' ALL THE NAMED fUDGES.'
--

P.O.Box224


Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned in the County to investigate aueqedviolations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
LHear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges"''' and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
k Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
I
, 1.r:t2'\,.1rrQ/'(.
V\L \/1.\)51\
1'-:"'1000.
Ne\\5bn
",
I"toy
t:.. IL..{o1i'CP\...U<:b'{
5tl
(){JS-
C,D7
II
rr::tSt)),\C,
~t2.0Yl
c. Pave
q~) j
(g(\C/l
l<iO't-~
~-evtac
1"lo/bLI
(pfo {Io
'l\e\\Q\)(.~ qmCh\.C{"lCVf-.-
3)
P/f!50U~
3+-
f}~b
W,
n Sh (w-dl

P.O.Box 224
Page
tea
of
$-
*Pursuant
to K;S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

:;;)
City/Zip
6. SvYV'isv'l)f:
13(0,
"
'"
f/Htsb.uc~/(3
/I i
~O~ 9c.t-k50,", ~~
arrier's Name'
~\C
I,
\::::"\I\.\l:...-
''U\.. ~~~
N\. ~~
, have
I Carrier's
Address
\l\-\O ~~~~AAcE'
W~S\- r'\1it'W'QL ts
City/Zip
Page ~
of ~
*Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT flEMING,
<,
'()~~tj
& LORI B. flEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE F'ROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS

P.O.Box 224

Iii
Print Name
Address
Email Address {Optional}
City/Zip
lLl'
'l.:Jut'AVOV'--WU.tlIQtl u~
~tJD'::> .). Dlm,1?
1j!J:JfWM'5.,I9~u"tf!a I
----->
I,
~Q...,
N'\.. Nf\.U~~
, have signed above as the carrier ofthis petition and do verify upon the
Page
91:>
of ~
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORIB. FLEMING
WE THE l>EOPLEBELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS

P.O.Box224


the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges** and attorneys(esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11t~ District local rule that bars all
confidence in the independence, integrity; and impartiality of the judiciary and beiieve it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
IAttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
I
Address
Print Name
~11~
"2
- 17{e&if ffuJciw01
r
V"#"'~_/
..
/61
t-, d9ytc4
Email Address
City/Zip
11)/ttsbtlfv[j
(Optional)
1.6AitkJ15~dUCfj1
A r Y""V
1'5~ f:~~
JIT4
ere-55
"r~('l
c~~s~~
c.trQ,,(~
''-ll.Cf
City/Zip
~~~N~~~
\\4-\0 ~~
I,
~
\. c:....- ~~
~
~
Page ~,
of
t.t<6
WE THE PEOPLE BELlEV E THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDiCE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
Email Address
~~
P.O.Box 224

2. Guilty judges { parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
Iii
Address
\'')0 ~
'5
\<tPOl~
2o(u s.
Hen111\(t\(, Ln
e~~ }J ~Y\v\- SA-
~ 10
10
/I~~
Carrier's Signature
ThQ..J \l\J\>J~
I,
\'l.~
~\.C-.-
i ~fO )
Carrier's Name
B\Q.,t-O\..~~
, have signed
I Ut\O
(o<Q-t
&"L
loVtCo 2
&cP ltpl.
f.rtto 7~:2
~~'~lpJ'd\
0t7G?;
fllte
fLl
Email Address
~\\N..~
,;>
IO~\J'
above as the carrier ofthis petition and do verify upon the
Page
!l.~
of ~
**A.J. WACHTER,KURTIS
P.O.Box224
*Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S~A.60-1206(a)
LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BEUEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM T11 JUDICIARY
SHDULD AUTOMATlCAU,Y
DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAl'vlED fUDGES.

ALL PETITIONERS
\
---i..


the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges and attorneys (esp. theirformer law partners) including instances of confirmed / shocking economic conflict of interests.
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCEin the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys .should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESScases voided, vacated, and reheard.
Attorneys who knowingly practiced'law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
i
Address
Print Name
:;) I
?--~I
C~f'S
~tv
~ 0')
'h\ ')
5je(! C. ((fl50 IA.
10
1;< ~ f\
Carrier's Signature
~Q..,.,
~~
carrier'S Name
~\.Q...,
N\.~~~
t.: 057(
?::Jf'
j-t-
(/
e>
7VC
1~~
r\P1J
'b~
1 ,v..ie_<fVff", ...~,;r;JWCQ'"
..c;2U
IV 6 r +h
~\'v.<..Q.
W,: 71-
~ ,[-
');)$ W ~Q\j~lh
Email Address
\:~t\P::
I V\~\J'
33h-\'vtl lli)~
I,
.have signed above as the carrier ofthis petition and do verify upon the
each sign er believes that the statements in this petition are true.
Page ~
of
M-C6
*Pursuant
1/
r~0/\
Carrier's A.ddress
\'-\-\0
City/Zip
111-
I (
lo~
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**A.J, WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING1 & LORI B. FLEMING
WE ra E PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE l:<'ROMTHE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL THE NA1VIEDJUDGES.
~
c/oNoah Day & Eric Muathe
P.O.Box224
For Questions
CaJ/:
(417) 434-0083
II

Petition cause a 9 rand jury to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges*" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
I
Signature
l'fUL..1Hl.'_~)'
:/~
/L~
P'I!'C0lG
rrotl\ty~
Ilv tp"(.V) VV,,1//tw"91
Address
Print Name
If
1:/
/'
c.....
jX'!.f-I-:;>t?L>IJl?)
t/
04 A.
fA;'
City/Zip
(rVl
t)S
p;A1'YYO'CO":;>nmX(\QU.)~~~
I rrQ'nlOVVT ru lU{hI~~A"
lY,,~h:f&.
G,dl
'~\
I'D
J":::>5r
K~
Cch-7fJ-Iks
2'1, 03
~3
MI~/."~f\
IV h(,;)J,
Email Address
?-~
P.O.Box224
Page ~
of ~~
SHOULD AUTOMATICALT~Y DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.

1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constltutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges** and attorneys (esp. theirformer law partners), including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESScases voided, vacated, and reheard.
11M
~;~)\ ~
~~
:
~J.I..
.
.\J
t/
City/Zip
Addres~
Print Name
.....S~~ature
L/",A"'~J<"
.\Vtn 7 .
.I
~~-tJ(
'V
1Af~\ ~-.I\ \ \'" ~\
\1)1<:0
4
5
n
7
8
9
10
~.,.:..---~
carAY;~~~
,,'Y'.~~~
I,
oatH~
carrd~
I\J/,'/\
each of ~igners
VJ
t (\(1.,'
larier's
Address
~A'd X ;2:J.4
City/Zip
})~Jvr5~f
Email Address
~('A'ID-.
.tVavesigned above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
on this peti~ion is\he genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that

P.O.Box 224
Page
a.s
**AJ.
of
..!:\:L *Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
WACHTER, KURTIS lOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
, .

ALL PETITIONERS
For Questions Calf: (417) 434-0083

----
GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS-
The undersiqned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 day~ after the filing of this
Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned In the County' to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
1, Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and,
the disturbing conflict~ of interest between Judges*'" and attorneys (esp. their ,former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of Interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be i,ndicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and alt related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
ttorneys who knoWingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitutjon of client and state income for every such case.
.
Email Address (optional)
City/Zip
Address
Print Name
')<lk r~CClJv<}r
S ( cQ (y; ~
S.\rCQ{
\kl,tcr
/'70't
~.l r-:
\G\t. C,
\ lYe C N's>+ ., ~
Carrier's
:5~e
Page ~
of ~
*Pursuant
'\', t\c;~~~) / (a
'S ~ \.:t \c> S ~~\ ,~~~ (~(loCpf~'

/ZIP
Address
L,J.
j'tA.c.,.l<~
.' 4
;::"""
.1_,.
,/~.j
re 7~..$1Emall Address
rs
to, K.S.A 223001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
WE niE
'7{/
PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUI?ICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
---Return Petitions To:

Suml:f\sry Judgment
clo Noah Day & ,Eric Muathe
P. O. Box 224
For Questions Ca": (417) 434-0083

www.FaceBook.com/JudgmentSummar.i
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
I
, 1 \J.U' A ICJ.U
1
L /1
\...ZIY ( .LA ,
M--(i;,-r- 4Pl'T,l!
urn<
I'
Ie-{V,'~
Address
Print Name
\.7ljiQCA
-r. 0.1UlJtx
(10017"
u,
';.;1 /fLQur,l/(
lifT
QOX: Up
Email Address
City/Zip
'<
(Optional)
J(.;J (Q&b47"
ILAec<Q6Bc." rl~
<.pCp
''''
Idrl
I'
Carrier's Name
-hAv!'(~ ~
Carrier's Address
-;>0 Z-, t#.
rut;~
City/Zip
~~
ltc,?~
I,
~
, have signed above as the carrier of this-petition and do verify upon the
Page
1'-
of
l<6'
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE F'ROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
.
Ema~ess
...

P.O.Box224

r
GRAND JURY PETITlO,.* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges** and attomeys(esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11III District local rule that bars all
confidence in the independence, integrity. and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open !hidden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attomeys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys eamed retumed and all related NO DUE PROCeSS cases voided, vacated, and reheard .
.ttomeys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
I
Address
,'"
ffa~dc::..I;f/L
City/Zip
:(X
I, \I~
( I {Q(1,.,)6/\
. have signed above as the carrier of tt\is petition and do verify upon the
Page
R~
of
$-
',
~,_'
_'_"-"': __: ",__. _~_,
~_""-""""""""",",,"---..i''''''''':'':~----''_~'~~',,,",-~''_';M.~'''''"-''.,,".c..,:.~_,._-.-...<
,,,.,;~_
..~~~';',-'..~
ALL PETITIONERS
RetUrn Petitions To:

Summary Judgment
P. O. Box 224
'.r=>:
GRAND JURY PETITION TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges and attorneys MP. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe It is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open !hidden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attomeys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
,ttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front ota judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
I
Gf'c.v--W
'6.--oS- vd
& 7re3
r) l~ t~~
~i-\l\CStv\l
506
&. ?-to 3
CrQ.,vOG
t'tr
Gr;rc..cJ
i-tl-3
J>
Page
Q..9
*Pursuant to K.S.A22-3001 (e) and K.S.A.60-1206(a)
of ~
WE TilE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL mE NAMED JUDGES.
of .. ~
1.0. __
__
.:.-~""""-
...:........-
~~w
, __
_..;,.~
.. _,
__
..
...,
_ .
,_
__
~." .
,,~

Summary Judgment
P. O. Box 224
iFor Questions Call: {417} 434-0083

I
Ii.
Address
Print Name
5r.e....\c...
;/V~~0fn
I, '~~
oath thasigners
City/Zip
I.N_~
~Q....
~have signed above as the carrier
of this petition and do verify upon the

on this petiti ~ is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
'2P.
of ~

Summary Judgment
c/o Noah Day
P. O. Box 224
Page
\
& Eric Muathe

www.judgrnentsummary.com

1.! Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new t t" District local rule that bars all
Judqes from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE in the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
ftorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
I
Address
Print Name
City/Zip
Email Address
(Optional)
mm
Email Address
have si~above
as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
oath that eacfofOT1'flesigners on this petition s the genuine signature of the person whose name It purports to be and that
;..
Page
3.\
of
It<ts
U~Lk\.-
f"/~
: **A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. flEMING
WE Tf:lE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS

P.O.Box224

www.ContlictGate.com

1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of jUdicial office and
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an Immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11thDistrict local rule that bars all
Ii'
Address
Print Name
!rPl",;')
C.~rlftl'\.
3r"1If/+e""
)<:Ovr-lh W!
'vJ~~'
1410 ~. SI'M.-lie r
c+
Carrier's Address
-'I'&tl/o/,)
:f'/Cf (..)/5 t! 'f Y,I 7&"'"
I,
c..c,r/-fl'\.
II4
If)
'//J7(/1'-ff/
' IIR1tcl1wi
~S ~& 7~ d-
City/Zi_
(Itf-.f'~"~~~4
tcz
Page
?-kh.
of
J:t~
Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 6O-1206(a)
Emall Address
Summary Judgment
P. O. Box 224
www.FaceBook.com/JudgmentSummary

Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authOrized by law:
,ttomeys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Iii
Print Name
Address
't'2D J ( ra.f.; /L
City/Zip
It)t
'c.
'l7C"L
5{o f, 5~1-h )'~
'\L....~LQl..D.' IIlJJ_...L
te1/'
I,
:>
Page
2>3
of ~
'
"7 ~"
'? '-
-l.,r

Summary Judgment
P. O. Box 224
r's::Affl
*Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 eC) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
** A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING,
Emall Address
& LORI B. FLEMING
WE TIlE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS

www.FaceBook.com/JudgmentSummary

the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges* and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys eamed returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
Iii
!{
s,
~
C. Q
g(J;Z
~ 6~
.Iv!
rs
\Al~I\C
'o~'"
r: ~uk.5v1
/~j'
51.
t, 5 o"
f'l;
/[Ants
~QC((.~
carrle~.,e-;://'''71//
sCerrl!-on
/ d-C-
........ -.
-t2-?f" ~
calr.rJe~s Address
1/0
sn-.d-t-r
~ity/Zip
\;~~SJ'V'{
t.cin.
I,
7'--r v ,:?
p~ /7-'-".v"1
Page ~
of ~
Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
IEmall Address
Summary Judgment
P. 0, Box 224
**A,J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
IFor Questions Call: (417) 434-0083
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE TH~T TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
www.FaceBook.com/JudgmentSumma~
1------..:..--=-----
the disturbnq conflicts of interest between Judges** and attorneys (esp. their former law uartners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
!Attorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
I
I
Address
Print Name
Email Address
(Optional)
JoAJ1s/J~
e
I
I v~'''V
f/'lfi'1f'Vf'~
~6~}~JtJuc4.l1$141
\~
tv"
'I\4'V
I vrt'l
~/~
".,
f LNV'
I..Y'
'\...I ~"
It
J )(
I~J 'S,rl,o f;TfrlClI M )(~A1clJdkl\.s c"G7~ .51
8
9
10
carrie~:.% . nature
A
I,
'?J'.
q ~ ey
K, v13
tf
g5
' have signed
Carrier's Address
.. tJ 156>< 16(
City/Zip
, sr~c;:-'t.7(0
above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
Page
35
of ~
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT HEMING,
& LORI B. flEMING
WE T1m PEOPI.E BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJODICEFROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
SHOULD AlJTOJ\lATICAU,Y DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
Email Address
..
P.O.Box 224

GRAND JURY P~TITION*
The undersigned qualified electors of the County of I~rawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas. DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to bean immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11th District local rule that bars all
2. Guilty judqes I parties attorneys should be.indicted, ousted out of office, moneysearned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
IAttorneys who knowingly practice~ law in front of a judge with a confl~ct of interest should face disciplinary aC,tionand restitution of client and ,state income for every such case.
Address
Email Address
City/Zip
(Optional)
z,
lit
I'
~e.('"
!u"t'/5 J,l4tr'1 ( 1<:3:>
vV~ C~
t01 ~
.-t20~t\;
R r is6",r~~$.
)(.s
u?.meJ.f\1
~\vY\?\c.
-Carrier's Name
~\u
is
}J
,Lou.x~
J+
Email Address
Carrier's Address
N\.Nw~
\J\.\O
<bW.
I,
~~
~ N'\_ ~\j~
-' have signed above asthe carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
Page
3f:,
of. ~
**AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY,
"Pursuant
ouvsn
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C)and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & lORIB.
J=lEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PE1TIlONERS
.SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.

P.O.Box 224

.www.ConflictGate.com
of
The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby requesUhat the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing
this
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges"'''' and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests .
..The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11th District local rule that bars all
I
I
I
i.
,
Address
~~h""
.;.
.,. ~or-
(lK q t; '<.'1
1\) IIj
sf- R(!~~l/'1
~\O
>.1:,
-:5.,.. I
I,
Zt
~2.
4/,
oath that each of the signers on this petition is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to
Page
of ~
*Pursuantto
be and that
K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A~60-1206(a)

Summary Judgment
P. o. Box 224
**AJ .. WACHTER, KURTIS lOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
www.FaceBook.com/JudgmentSumma.ry
TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD
COUNTY, KANSAS
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new t t" District local rule that bars all
IAttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
I
Iii
Address
Print Name
,...1
./1'
MI
't=f/' _'I1:ZJyr.A!"ZIXl
J-H
IV."
1\.:..
('1 n "'lY(.IYlU{(""-'
I U
q..,
O~
\0.
N
,tV
cg II
i:t l-Ier:
,
::?
\J
;:-')
tf..
e'1
/,.."
'W
"::::rJ! --
\-J!:.lg""'p3V
(/1
- -
rI If)
1/f::!...J
1'
I ''"'''LV ';I 7"<;;'
2>'?)
of ~
**A.J. WACHTER,
I'
16
C~
v-~
l,
q7
IC" nj
Page
(Optional)
5f;/~;~jl
n \D s W
Email Address

P.O.Box224
KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING,
& LORI B. FLEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEV E THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDiCIARY ALL PETITIONERS
SHOUT~D AUTOMATICALLY DISQUAUFY ALL THE NAMED fuDGES.


Iii
Signature
Print Name
Address
((
'-
(o+tI1W-
/,(}" lit)Y
l?J
li r:
/-(5. ~67~#
!/
r'vIl4''-iC::: D\)
V'-<
Page
.39
of ~
**AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEfFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
IFor Questions Calf: (417) 434-0083

www FaceBook.com/JudgmentSummarv
.
.. -
[= ~- --
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges"''' and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic contiict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11 th District local rule that bars all
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted but of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard .
Iii
J..-.ll!-f:rWl.t,4:b-<4rl{lllfu~t
I..JL()O.\e, \' &<i\Doqqb I
City/Zip
Address
Print Name
j
-:,
.J
='-- ,~e~.;...
n \
I~O(~\enat
~r
ity b
\c"7G 3- ~
Uf) 1 (p ~ It.'
I
---_I
?~~~~, b6"ZuL
Lo{L
Page ~
of ~
"Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
uA.J. WACHTER, KURTIS lOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING

Summary Judgment
P. O. Box 224
Pittsburg. Kansas, 66762

www.FaceBook.com/JudgmentSummar~
The undersigned qualified electors,.otth,!:l,Cquritybf Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
Petition cause a grand jury to be.~mrD()iiedrn:the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
1, Hear testimony and investigate' alleged vipl?lticinsof Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest 1;>,~tWeen
JGcfges**and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this,County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11 th District local rule that bars all
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases, The people have NO CONFIDENCE in the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests,
ttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case,
I
Email Address
Address
DR
(Optional)
u;oCj ~ ;)"q 1h
o C\
t: ~q-+h
3t!
"
ct- ?<-J/ !PI~~
~,u.tfL/
I 0-'"
\~)..)
~
~/I)\e.,\\\)Q,IL...\, N\\''11.l
I'
-- -
LA.
I!QDL-
\;V . ..::....
I I a I W ~\
rs::
v\."'-'\-
)Da!l:;
if_A
I '-..J:p~\\~'" l:.r~~
~& 7"Z;
'1\ qs~
I,
;<.,'0 '
, '. , have signed above as the carrier ofthis petition and do verify upon the
each signer believes that the statements in this petition are true._
of
$-
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT flEMING,
"
& LORI B. flEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE fROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL THE NA1VIEDJUDGES.
I'
I'
/~-'I
Page ~
1N!!J4I
Em'l
at Address
P.O.Box224


the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges** and attorneys (esp. theirformer law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
Iii
Signature
Print Name
~o-.\.
c>!M~~
f\ ~
/J A
__
Urr ~.ifGt!.
I .~
/"
~,
'
r-.
-'
-'lt9~
V'I
1..1.1
I
II"
I - .. -/q
'{o
UJ
U'(l
\?'t-\\-s~\.A
V\u,.\17
'-/,1"-'_'
I .Email
City/Zip
Address
L.-'
(I
le<.e\
1.0
Address
(Optional)
c_
i1ct
I Frwp
dr
lKP
{./~I
J" r/
v
I . "',
"
V'"
,.
lOb
Email Address
'1\ q
I, 5"e'7 f( II n5

P.O.Box 224
Page
of ~
I~
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND I>REJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
S.HOULD AUTOMATICALLY
ALL PETITIONERS

GRAND JURY PETITION'" TO THE DISTRlcr COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11th District focal rule that bars all
I
Address
Signature
~ lQi:L
II
{Iff (/
.. 'JU,14lh~
I
'--/~
__
I (
I\~'-'~n~
I8
~~
"(IVV
~~Jy~~
I~
I.LV
-
vrv
_.
1-L.l-'"J' .4?=o/\O\U?OV\
1"x"VI'~
~~v"'J~
I \ ,()S\.(. '~I{V\aV\Jf
I ~qw;1
16Ib~~'i
1"--'---
6{/"Z-~
f::7IVlllC
C~ier's Name
I\.44cI,
,.# ...
l~fU~F~
fBC(
I'.'
-"-"'---~-7'1\
\A/
..
I\
-...) ) ~
\V
"~:y
.,t:',
"-7
1C{;f S e7 K,' fI!)
\f\/vr
v":~ ..)\-Jl...v=1i4-'J
'--""""""7
,_r'iY'{.)
I.
\:-rtyt>Ulg
P uv\ja..s I
16-
If .: '.' !e.>~'di T'0..l
is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
in this petition
Page ~
Pursuant to K.S.A22-3001 (C)and K.S.A.60-1206(a}
I"
I\W).Jt{
VI
':?.1.lj _
tdP76t
each signer believes that the statements
I'"
{.e~!r:\ArU
, have
oath that each of the signers on this petition
of ~
'tf
L--~!f-I
~(;:?'"6 ~
fel dl d-
I' 1\
\Z--\.f
are true.

Summary Judgment
P.O. Box 224
Pittsbur& Kansas,66762
I----------------~-----www.FaceBook.com/JudgmentSumm~
I'

2. Guilty judges Iparties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
I
v,
I ~~~v-'
I ,~wl
~,,.....\v
I'---'>7 MYl'\
tQ
tAIl
Address
Print Name
[0..( L./\
c..J(,q \
Idk'..) ( r"
\}Ol
V /
'-.-JD'likJ
V~\I
City/Zip
';.
-.J"
I cn vvu., I (9'->'
V~'i)\ ~I
L...
\:;S '\
It)
l',O\.l).Vl"'lttheotE cr-..d1(\Cj<f~
I'"
I kli
.i->:
r::::;"5H
()
t/qf tt S ey
;<:II,
- .have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
I,
Page
.ft Mof
*Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
WE THE I'EOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS .:

c/o Noah Oay & Eric Muathe
P.O.Box224
For Questions Caff: (417) 434-0083


the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges-- and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
,ttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge With a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Iii
tf). t.. tY'~
~o(, 'W(St
)6
2-20 '-z; L,/, ZtJ f-\.
r (,#1
Carrier's Name
I,
t t9 te r ~ 0 tJ y-
t, ~5.Tt?rh6~rQ-
Q.-
, have
150 q E l//eh
e r:
Ilrdhret'1~6 'C;~
Page ~
of
48'
Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

Summary Judgment
P. O. Box 224
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDIOARY ALL PETITIONERS
www~FaceBook.comlJudgmentSummary
-F
the disturbing.confiicts of interest between Judges** and attorneys (esp. theirformer law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate: for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
Uorneys who knowingly practiced law in fronlof a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
I
Print Name
\.,I\\!.116
~!~\,
I5
It'h....,~
1,1 .-~
Address
\,~(
I~)
1 ,.~,
..;...r';.)T'"
I 1--,2, /,
EmailAddress
l=-=>'!
I'
A-
14.
<;"4c
r I
(Optional)
I"
---Y~;l?,"!,'(,Il'f~
I Ln.sgl/2V!
I'
u-s L.t 71.:;2-
6,{:3~
b 6 L.f l{).
.s
Met') 11~If tq
4 r./ . J4ViG'
t~()
Ie }-rlot~ K5
/).1:4-1 c~ otLP
City/Zip
KqSe
,..r'
/"
." .r"/
,//
\
IEmail Address
..-..--- .....
~"~
dh}.'s/0'I:P~O
It
I, - If " ~
~have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
oath that each othe sign
on this petition is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that

c/oNoah
Day & Eric Muathe
P.O.Box 224
Page ~
of ~
"Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
Pittsburg,
Kansas, 66762


the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges and attorneys (esp. their fOrmer law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
confidence in the independence. integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
Iii
City/Zip
",,3 D 3
..S -
J e t;:.{Cr;;
all.
30,/ -s. ot/f~LiJy) t<O
1.;p;.-;:>-T1'fcIZCZC
ks.- Gb'jd'
I G

Summary Judgment
c/o Noah
Day & Eric Muathe
P. O. Box 224
Page
J:t3:- of ~
Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (e) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
** AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
or Questions Call: (417) 434-0083

www.FaceBook.com/JudgmentSumma!)!

1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DVE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
The reasonable people ofthis County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11thDistrict local rule that bars all
Ii'
Address
Print Name
Ii
I
l)QanrD~~
'-/c~nDe
1<. Jt,v
L~'
5C
IF
,.q
".-Cucnt
~I
rOAL:.Y(
Lt, ,[12,st:.
f'--' I ,'-I",
iffJ, k (/1<Jot. -<!--
el//JI"
G' ~1I..J;c;,p "$)\
leu . 0T""'
City/Zip
I ~YJd
I
Yay(~
lolo103
lvW l'i )
I~
S cpll,lfcd"
c.~,(;Jft;K5
t,t 7~f
303S
~/
P/'A, 7\/r;;~ v
I, ~t'B{,have signeffabove as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
oa't
at eac~ of the signers on tiS petition is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
Page
l-\-~
of ~
*Pursuant
JP
tt:, 7;1 5'
)0 ~
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS.LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT flEMING,

P.O.Box 224
& LORI B. flEMING

DAMAGES, DECLARATORY,
OR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
DEFENDANTS
JUDGE KURTIS I. LOY
JUDGE ANDREW J. WACHTER
JUDGE ROBERT J. FLEMING
JUDGE LORI B. FLEMING
JUDGE JEFFRY L. JACK
JUDGE OLIVER KENT LNCH
JUDGE JANICE RUSSELL
JUDGE JOHN E. SANDERS
COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS
STANTON A. HAZLETT
MICHAEL GAYOSO, JR.
TIM GRILLOT
KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL DEREK SCHMIDT
Page lof11
Reasons that 'PANELA' AND'PANELB' OFTHE KANSASCOMMISSIONON JUDICIAL

QUALIFICATIONSneed to be served as well as investigated are as follows:
Why send judges who have been complained on one type of letter advising the judge what they
need to correct or use caution on and send a completely different letter to the complainant like the
Travis Carlton order in case number 2014CV7P? The panel also needs to be investigated why they
allowed Honorable Robert Fleming to be the Chair of the Kansas Commission on Judicial
Qualifications when he himself was violating the rules of "THE KANSASCOMMISSIONONJUDICIAL
QUALIFICATIONS"
by being a youth preacher and having his wife collect money for the "PARISH".
Judge Fleming is also hearing his past law partners cases and by recusing himself from ethic
complaints on Donald Noland by Kasey King, Michael King, and Kolby King back on July 25 of 2003,
recusing himself from Lester Moore's "DOCKETED"complaint 1179 on March 11, 2013 on A.J.
Wachter because he was his former college roommate, member of Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic
Church, teammate at Colgan, and former owner of'WHbert, Towner, Lassman, Toburen, Fleming,
and Wachter". Judge Robert Fleming failed to recuse himself from complaints filed by Julie Stover
against Timothy Fielder on May 11,2011 and he failed to recuse himself from complaints filed by
Kasey King and Julie Stover on March 11, 2013 against Honorable Goering and Honorable J. Patrick
Walters where "Judge Walters was recused from the case" out of Wichita. Kasey King,Julie Stover,
and Michael King all got Judge Fleming's former law partner, A.J.Wachter, reprimanded with a
"LETTEROF CAUTION"in docket number 1114,1115, and 1116 for his inappropriate use ofthe
term "peanut gallery" made on June 7, 2011 which was two years before the above mentioned
complaint. Robert Fleming also should have never heard any complaint made by "Kasey King or
Michael King" because Kasey King played league and All-Star Baseball with Michael Fleming who
was coached by Michael Kingwhen he played 14 and 15 year old All Star Baseball. Judge Loy had
previously recused himself from case number 2011DM136P with Dustin Blair for involvement in
All Star Baseball with his son Kris Loy when he was the coach and this inconsistency with recusing
under Rule 2.11 (A) is why this investigation is needed.
The wrongful acts of Crawford County District Court employees led to a class action lawsuit filed by
Kasey King, Michael King,Lester Moore, Julie Stover, Eric Muathe, and Noah Day in case number
13CV47P that was filed against Crawford County District Judges including the relief judge,
Honorable Senior Judge Janice Russell, for wrongful acts and omission of employees. Janice Russell
also had a Writ of Mandamus filed against her in the State Supreme Court in Appellate Case No. 12108867-S and since the attorney general's office in Topeka chose to represent the above mentioned
judges in court cases before where they were sued civilly or perhaps had ouster complaints filed
against their BONDS,instead chose to defend the above mentioned judges instead of prosecute
them and their insurance BONDSso that all judges in the 11thjudicial district, including Janice
Russell and John Sanders, would become "UNBONDABLE"by any insurance agent in the state of
Kansas under KS.A. 60-1205 and KS.A.60-1206(a)(b).
The thing that disturbs the people in the 11thjudicial district is that the "KANSASCOMMISIONON
JUDICIALQUALIFICIATIONS"
does not even follow their own "Advisory Opinion Annotations" when
it means they have to rule against their own religious members, family, former law partners, and
friends that should be disqualified from hearing a case for a conflict of interest under Rule 2.11(A)
Page 2of11
of RULESRELATINGTO JUDICIALCONDUCT.Judge Robert Fleming's daughter-in-law, Lori Bolton

Fleming has already been "NOTED"on December 13, 2012 by the "KANSASCOMMISSIONON
JUDICIALQUALIFICA
TINES"for her husband being the treasurer Jcampaign manager for county
attorney Michael Gayoso. Somehow, Judge Lori Fleming thinks even after being noted by the
committee after a complaint by Lester Moore in December 13, 2012, she is still hearing the cases of
Mr. Gayoso. Even though they are members in the church band "Team Jesus", apparently there are
no conflicts! Lori Fleming also just recently got reprimanded with an informal letter of advice on
February 23,2015 for the "appearance of practicing law" even though she is an 11thjudicial district
judge because she was listed in the "NAMESAND NUMBERS2013 and 2014 phone book" as an
attorney with the phone number of 620-231-1290. This number conveniently rings to her former
employer, Fred Splgarelli, and her husband Kyle Fleming of "Fleming's Law Firm" which is housed
inside the Spigarelli Law Firm! Judge Loy was reprimanded for the same thing on February 23,
2015 for having the "appearance of a law firm" and for double dipping as "Loy and Sagehorn" and
still hearing their cases and not recusing himself, even after complaints had been filed against him
in case number 2014LM55P and 2014LM409P where he heard the case of Burton Harding and Kip
Sagehorn and is still listed as the current judge.
There are numerous reasons why there should be an investigation into Panel A and Panel B of the
KANSASCOMMISSIONONJUDICIALQUALIFICATIONScommittee to see why these judges are able
to violate their own rules and still be a judge when they have obviously violated the "oath of office"
to be called 'Your Honor' when they have shown they have been "ANYTHINGANDEVERYTHING
EXCEPT HONORABLE"and have failed to follow Rule 1.1 of Rules Relating to Judicial Conduct
Compliance with the Law, which says "Ajudge shall comply with the law and the Kansas Code of
Judicial Conduct
The people have included a copy of The Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications "Advisory
Opinion Annotations" which shows obvious cases where Robert Fleming should have not allowed
his son Kyle Fleming or his daughter-in-law Lori Bolton Fleming to go in front of judges in the 11th
judicial district along with Candace Brewster Gayoso whose uncle and father are Daniel and David
Brewster who were former 11thjudicial judges and had a financial CDwith Robert Fleming
according to his financial disclosure report.
In 1984, JE-8 says "Appearance of attorney who is judge's daughter before other judges in district.
Canon 3C" How does this not relate to Lori Fleming, Kyle Fleming, and Candace Brewster Gayoso as
attorneys when they go in front of judges in the 11thjudicial district?
In 1984, JE-ll says "Attorney's advice to clients upon being appointed to the bench,
recommendation of spouse/attorney. Canon 2 " How does this not relate to Lori Fleming
advertising in the phone book for her husband's law firm of "Fleming Law Firm" and Judge Loy
advertising for "Loy and Sagehorn"?
In 1984, JE-12 says "Appearance of firm members before former partner, now district judge, who is
also owner/landlord of firm's office building and son of former partner who is retired and receiving
an annuity form the firm and whose name remains on firm letterhead. Canons 2B and 3C:' How
does this not relate to Kurtis Loy who owned the office building of "Loy and Sagehorn" and still
Page 3 of 11
owned 99% stock of Loy and Sageborn and Kip Sageborn and Burton Harding go in front of him and
still currently are according to the docket in case number 2014LM55P and 2014LM409P. Judge
Ley's father also previously had stock at "Loyand Sagehorn". Where did Judge Loy's stock go?
In 1985, JE-13 says "Attendance of judge's spouse at political gatherings; political contributions by
judge's spouse form spouse's business income maintained in separate account." How does this not
relate to Lori Fleming's husband Kyle Fleming being Michael Gayoso's campaign manager and Lori
Fleming and Kyle Fleming donating money to Michael Gayoso's campaign? The Lester Moore
Complaint in December 13, 2012 should have been a reprimand resulting in a letter of caution,
informal advice with a "PRIVATECEASEANDDESIST"from Lori Fleming ever being able to hear
Michael Gayoso's cases.
In 1987, JE-19 says "Involvement of judge in cases handled by judge's former law firm'; effect of
"blind trust" set up by judge to administer proceeds due him upon his leaving practice. Canon 2;
3C(1), (2), and (3); and 3D. All the judges in the judicial district heard their law partners' cases
within 5 years after becoming a judge, especially Judge Oliver Lynch, [effry Jack, and Kurtis Loy. So,
how does this not pertain to the judges in the 11thdistrict? Kurtis Loy is still hearing cases of
Burton Harding and Kip Sagehorn, according to dockets on 4-28-2015 in 2014LMS5P and
2014LM409P. April 28, 2015 was just last month!
In 1987, JE-21 says "Property of newly-appointed district judge remaining as co-trustee of former
clients' revocable trust Canon 5D How does this not pertain to Judge Kurtis Loy owning 99% of his
stock at Loy and Sagehorn and owning the building at 112 W. 4thin Pittsburg Kansas? The "ORDER"
in case number 2014CV7P from August 2014 in the complaint filed by Travis Carlton against Kurtis
Loy where "the information was for his eyes only but Chief Judge Wachter filed it publicly" clearly
should have been a reprimand with a letter of caution, informal advice with a "Private Cease and
Desist" to leave the case because of 5th amendment right of Due Process Of Law.
In 1988, JE-25 says "Judicial candidates' continuation as weekend pastor". Canon 5A and SB(2).
How does this not relate to Robert Fleming the 11thjudicial district judge and chair for numerous
years of the "KANSASCOMMISIONONJUDICIALQUALIFICATION"?How, to this day, is Robert
Fleming, Kyle Fleming, and his wife Peggy Fleming still youth ministers and Judge Lori Fleming a
"lecturer" at Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Church and it does not violate JE-25???
In 1988, JE-26 Recusal due to relationship disqualification under Canon 3C(1) (d) (iv); procedure for
remittal of such relationship under Canon 3D? Why do 11thdistrict judges and Janice Russell and
John Sanders not all clear on "when to recuse and when not to"?
In 1992, JE-37 says "Judge's spouse as campaign manager in partisan county-wide election". How
does this not relate to attorney Kyle Fleming being Michael Gayoso's campaign manager when his
wife Lori Fleming is a judge? Lester Moore's complaint on December 13, 2012 that was "NOTED"by
committee should have been a reprimand.
In 1992, JE-38 states, "judge as member of Kansas Commission on Governmental Standards and
Conduct. Kan. Const., art 3 Section 13." How does this not relate to previous Ethic Chair Robert
Fleming?
Page 4 of 11
In 1993, JE-42 says "Judge presiding at docket call wherein son or son's law firm represents a
party." Canon 3C(1)(d)(i), [ii], [iii], How does this not relate to Judge Robert Fleming with Kyle
Fleming and Lori Fleming as attorneys before him and Candace Brewster Gayoso in front of Daniel
or David Brewster and Kurtis Loy in front of his father Kurtis Loy for numerous years?
In 1994, JE-47 says "Judge as member of non-profit corporation board of directors. Canon 58." How
does this not relate to Oliver Lynch of the Kansas Arts Board? And this also should relate to Kurtis
Loy of "THE STILLWELLFOUNDATION"where Kurtis Loy received over $200,000.00 offorgivable
loans from the City of Pittsburg economic committee where his former law partner, Mark Werner,
and attorney Kyle Fleming, spouse of Lori Fleming, and son of Honorable Robert Fleming, are the
two attorney/committee members who agreed on the request from Kurtis Loy and gave the "FREE"
money?
In 1994, JE-49 says "Part-time city attorney serving as part-time municipal judge for a different
city". How does this not relate to Pittsburg city prosecutor and city judge in Cherokee County, John
Mazurek? The complaints of Jim Willard filed in February of 2015 that were dismissed by Stanton
Hazlett and The Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications.
In 1997, JE-72 says "Municipal judge who is also assistant county attorney may serve as prosecutor
under certain conditions." How did John Mazurek get away with being a municipal judge in
Cherokee County and was the assistant county attorney under Michael Gayoso for years? Is it
because Michael Gayoso's wife is Candace-Brewster Gayoso and had ties to 11thjudicial former
judges, Daniel and David Brewster? The complaint of Jim Willard on February of 2015 should have
been a reprimand.
In 1997, JE-77 says "Judge may serve as elder of church as long as judge does not solicit funds.
Canon 4C(4)(b j," How does this not relate to Judge Robert Fleming when his wife Peggy collects
money for the "PARISH"at Our Lady Of Lourdes Catholic Church where he, their son Kyle,and
Peggy are youth ministers? The complaint filed by Eric Muathe back in December of 2014 to
February of 2015 against Robert Fleming for his ties to Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Church should
have been a reprimand.
In 1988, JE-81 says "Judge should not purchase property from an estate pending in the judge's court
even though the transaction was at arm's length and in good faith. Canons 1, 2A,4A(1) and 40(1).
How does this not relate to Judge Loy and Judge Gariglietti whose wives are realtors in this county?
In 1988, JE-84 says "Judge may serve on a land purchase committee for his church ifhe will do no
legal work or fund raising." How does this not relate to Robert Fleming because the Catholic
Diocese of Wichita, which is over all the Catholic churches in this area, previously owned "Crawford
County Judicial Center" at 602 N. Locust. Pittsburg, Kansas! Robert Fleming's wife collects money
for the "PARISH"and has a retirement account from the Catholic Diocese according to his financial
disclosure reports since she was a teacher at ST. Mary's Colgan, which is the private Catholic school
in Pittsburg, Kansas.
In 2000, JE-95 says "Judge must cease all participation in ownership interest in a law firm building.
Canon 4D(1) (6)." How does this not relate to Judge Kurtis Loy still hearing Kip Sagehorn's cases
Page 5 of 11
when Judge Loy owns the building of the law firm? How was Judge Loy able to still make judicial
determinations and stay in case number 2014CV7P when Travis Carlton made a complaint for this
and Mr. Carlton got one letter saying it was dismissed and Judge Loy got another letter telling him
to get his financial affairs in order? Why was there at least not a letter of caution for this???? How
can a judge stay in a case after a complaint makes them change their Articles of Incorporation and
the judge not be biased?
In 2001, JE-102 says" District magistrate judge may release log or written record of all closed cases
to the media as long as the judge does not comment on pending cases. Canon 3B(9)" Why does
Janice Russell comment on pending cases of Eric Muathe to other attorneys against him???
In 2003, JE-112 says "Judges may volunteer to cook and serve meals at a community soup kitchen
sponsored by a local church and open to the public daily. Canon 4C(4)" How does this not apply to
Robert Fleming since Our Lady of Lourdes is a private church and not a public one and he and his
wife are always volunteering/raising money for Our Lady of Lourdes "PARISH"?!!!!!
In 2005, JE-126 says "Judges should not attend or participate in a conference sponsored or
presented by a law enforcement agency which would in effect train judges to consider these
matters in future cases. See JE-121. Canon 2A and Canon 3B(7)" How does this not relate to Judge
Lori Fleming since she sits drinking wine with Crawford County Deputy Stu Hite and his wife Amy
as Stu Hite himself explains law enforcement techniques to her husband, attorney Kyle Fleming as
Mr. Fleming drinks wine himself in the picture at Crestwood County Club which is "PRIVATE"!!!
How can Lori Fleming hear cases that involve Stuart Hite as the arresting officer, which she does
when he is a youth minister at her church, private member at Crestwood, and good family friend?
In 2005, JE-130 says "An adverse ruling, standing alone, is not grounds for
judge who is being sued by a pro se counterclaim ant. Canon 3E" How does
class action lawsuit in case number 13CV47P that involves Janice Russell?
sued alone does not require disqualification, but this ruling disagrees with
should recuse or not recuse.
disqualification of a
this not relate to the
Just because she was
her ruling when a judge
In 2005, JE-131 says "Ajudge may attend an open house sponsored by a law firm; however, a judge
should not accept a golf and poker invitation from a law firm since it would create a perception of
impropriety due to the expense. Canon 2. How does this not relate to Judge Robert Fleming, Lori
Fleming, Kurtis Loy,A.J.Wachter, and deceased Chiefjudge John Gariglietti all playing Golftogether
at Crestwood and paying membership fees? How does this not apply to Stanton Hazlett's Golf
Charity with attorneys where they get credits for attending his workshop? This is why Stanton
Hazlett should not be able to investigate any complaint against an attorney due to his economic
conflicts of interest.
In 2005, JE-135 says "Ajudge may bid for land at a public auction arising out of foreclosure action if
the judge has nothing to do with the foreclosure action, since it would not exploit his position or
give an appearance of impropriety. Canon 4D(1) and Canon 2A." How does this not have to do with
Judge Kurtis Ley's wife Cindy Loy being a realtor and deceased John Gariglietti's wife Eunice
Gariglietti being a realtor as well??? Judge Loy's wife Cindy Loy and Judge Garigliettie's wife Eunice
Page 60f11
went in on all the property for the new Crestwood Estates Edition out by the private "Crestwood
Country Club" which they are all members. Cindy Loy and Eunice Gariglietti are the first to hear of
any foreclosures when it becomes property for sale. Seems like that is a huge impropriety.
In 2007, JE-151 says "A district judge participating as a player and/or auctioneer in his or her
country club's fundraising member guest tournament clearly violates Canon 4C(4) (b) which
prohibits fundratsing. How does this not relate to Judge Loy,Judge Robert Fleming, Judge Lori
Fleming, former deceased judge John Gariglietti, and Judge A.J.Wachter when they play golf at
"Crestwood Country Club"? They are all participating in the fundraisers that happen throughout
the year. When a fundraising event happens at the country club, you can count on any, if not all, of
these to attend. There are pictures to prove it.
In 2009, JE-167 says "Ajudge is required to disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in which
the partner of the judge's spouse represents a party before the judge. See Canon, 2, Rule 2.11(A)
and Canon 1, Rule 1.2. How does this not relate to Robert Fleming when he was hearing cases of'].
Gordon Gregory from 'Wilbert and Towner" as his son and daughter-in-law worked for Wilbert and
Towner and Spigarelli Law Firm where he accepted both assignments from those law firms. This
should also apply to Oliver Lynch when he heard cases of Candace Gayoso when Michael Gayoso
was still paying Oliver Lynch money from the buyout of his law firm.
And last but not least, how does 2011 JE-171 not affect Judge Kurtis Lay who according to the
dockets in case number 2014LM55P on 4/28/2015 and 2014LM409P still show Kurtis Loy as the
current judge when the attorneys are Burton Harding and Kip Sagehorn of "Loy and Sagehorn" even
after a complaint was filed with Stanton Hazlett on this matter and Mr. Hazlett said "he's sure Judge
Loywill take care of this once he learns of it". That was in November of 2014 and it is now 4/28/
2015 and yet the docket in case number 2014LM55P shows on 2/13/2015 that a garnishment
order was signed by Judge Lay. The opinion of JE-171 in 2011 says "Ajudge and his or her spouse
who owns an office building may lease the building to attorneys or law firms who practice and
appear in the judge's district as long as the attorneys appear before other judges in the district and
the conflicts appear only periodically. See Rules 1.2, 2.1, 2.11, 3.11.
Since the "KANSAS COMMISISONONJUDICIALQUALIFICATIONS"
has failed to be consistent with
their handling of ethic complaints and since they claim they have no jurisdiction to
recuse/disqualify a judge yet Rule 2.11(A) requires Disqualification under their rules and they have
the power to issue a "CEASEANDDESISTORDERPUBLICOR PRIVATE"and this is confusing and
that is why the KANSASCOMMISSIONON JUDICIALQUALIFICATIONSneeds to be investigated as
well. It also is very disturbing that Robert Fleming has violated several examples of advisory
annotation opinions of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications yet he was still able to be
their Chair person for the ethic committee for numerous years.
The above mentioned examples of advisory case annotations that were not followed by "THE
KANSASCOMMISSIONON JUDICIALQUALIFICATIONSPanel A, Panel B",Stanton Hazlett
Disciplinary Administrator, Michael Gayoso County Attorney's Office,and Stephen Phillips Attorney
General's Office,Timothy Grillot which have now led to the claim against them for injunctive relief
Page 7 of 11
from negligent and wrongful acts and omissions of employees by failing to carry out their
ministerial tasks which are the following:
1. Stanton Hazlett refusing to give complaints filed against himself to The Disciplinary Oversight
Committee.
2. Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications failing to follow their own advisory opinions and
failing to properly investigate case number 2014CV7P and 2014CCV53PA and failing to give
Honorable Loya Private Cease and Desist Order even though the "ORDER"filed by Judge Wachter in
August 2014 in this case shows that a violation of Advisory opinion of2011 JE-171 and yet no
reprimand was done.
3. Stanton Hazlett failed to address attorney/judge Kurtis Loy for hearing case number
2014LM55P which is the case of his past law partner Kip Sagehorn. Mr. Hazlett stated that he was
sure Judge Loy will take care of this once he learns of it, but the court docket of 4-28-2015 shows he
is still violating the Advisory Opinion of 2011 JE-171 since Stanton Hazlett and The Kansas
Commission on Judicial Qualifications failed to properly carry out this investigation which led to a
wrongful act of Stanton Hazlett, Panel A and Panel B,by failing to properly reprimand Judge Loy.
4. Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications failed to reprimand Robert Fleming for a violation
of 1988 JE-25 and 1997 JE-77 for his involvement as a youth preacher at Our Lady of Lourdes
Catholic Church, yet his wife collects money for the "PARISH". They have also failed to reprimand
Robert Fleming for recusing from Kasey King and Michael King's ethic complaints back in July 25,
2003, but yet failed to recuse from Kasey King's complaint against Honorable Goering and
Honorable Walters in Wichita on March 13, 2011 after Kasey King, Michael King,and Julie Stover all
got Robert Fleming's former law partner and former college roommate, A.J.Wacther, reprimanded
with a letter of caution on June 7, 2011. Robert Fleming also failed to recuse himself from Julie
Stover's May 11, 2011 complaint against Timothy Fielder who was a city/pro-tempore judge in the
11thjudicial district and Judge Robert Fleming should have recused from that complaint like he did
with complaints against Honorable Donald Noland and Honorable A.J.Wachter. This inconsistency
with Rule 2.11(A) and K.SA 20-311d has led to the people of the 11thjudicial district not receiving
due process oflaw from the previous ethic chair person himself.
5. Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications has failed to reprimand Lori Fleming and Michael
Gayoso for allowing Michael Gayoso to practice law in front of Judge Lori Fleming when her
husband was Mr. Gayoso's campaign manager and her church band partner in "TEAMJESUS"which
is an obvious violation of Rule 2.11(A).
6. The Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications failed to reprimand Oliver Lynch, Kurtis Loy,
and Jeffry Jack for a violation of 1987JE-19 even though they heard numerous cases oftheir former
law partners within a 5 year window.
7. Michael Gayoso is being served for failing to follow "Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct" Rule
1.7 Conflict of Interest by failing to recuse himself from cases that involve attorneys he has
previously worked with and for litigating cases in front of judges that he is friends and private
members of Our Lady Of Lourdes Catholic Church. He has also failed to investigate complaints
Page 80f11
under K.S.A. 60-1206( a) that were filed against Judge A.J. Wachter because he is a member of the
same church as Judge A.J.Wachter.
8. Stephen Phillips is being served for failing to follow KRPC Rule 1.7 as well since he has
previously represented 11th judicial judges as clients then went in front of the same judge later on
to represent another client. He has also failed to investigate complaints filed against 11th judicial
judges under KS.A. 60-1206(a)(b) and that is why he needs investigated as well for committing a
negligent act by failing to conduct a thorough investigation.
9. Stanton Hazlett has allowed Timothy Grillot in case numbers 2014CV7P and 2014CV53P to
investigate the complaint on Judge Timothy Fielder even though the complaint has to do with
Robert Fleming signing an Ex-Parte Order with Timothy Fielder and Timothy Grillot and Robert
Fleming were co-defendants in case number 12-3177 -SAC Ozell Pouncil vs. Labette County District
Court et al, Robert Fleming, Timothy Grillot and both are members of the Catholic Church and have
known each other for years and this is a violation of KRPC Rule 1.7 Conflict of Interest as a neutral
unbiased investigator should have been assigned to investigate these cases. Stanton Hazlett has
also failed to recuse/disqualify
himself from investigating cases of attorneys that receive credits at
his golf tournaments which is a violation of2005 JE-131 and 2007 JE-151.
All of the above 9 claims have been a result of failing to perform their ministerial acts of properly
investigating cases without conflicts of interest. An example of a ministerial act is the clerk of the
court's duty to report drivers to the DHSMVunder Section 3.1815(1)(a)
is a ministerial
act that is
not entitled to any form of judicial immunity in case number16-203-CA-005890.

"The clerk, an
officer of the court, is obliged to comply with rules of procedure governing his duties. "When
delinquent
or derelict in such performance,
appropriate
legal measures are available to
enforce compliance, as well as to secure redress by way of damages incurred as a result of
his failure to perform those duties." Ward v. Fountain, 122 So. 2d 209, 210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960)
(emphasis added).
ARGUMENT
1. Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications conduct in reprimanding judges for violations of
Rules Relating To Judicial Conduct is a Ministerial Act, not a Judicial Act for Which Immunity is
Available.
2. Stanton Hazlett's conduct in reprimanding attorneys for violations of Kansas Rules of
Professional Conduct is a Ministerial Act, not a Judicial Act for Which Immunity is Available.
3. Michael Gayoso's conduct in failing to disqualify himself form cases that are a conflict of interest
is a Ministerial Act, not a Judicial Act for Which Immunity is Available.
Page 9 of 11
4. Stephen Phillips conduct in failing to reprimand 11th judicial judges for violations from ouster
quo warranto complaints filed under KS.A.60-1206( a) is a Ministerial Act, not a Judicial Act for
Which Immunity is Available.
5. Timothy Grillot's conduct in failing to disqualify himself from a complaint that had to do with an
Ex-Parte violation of Rule 2.9 between Robert Fleming and Timothy Fielder of Rules Relating To
Judicial Conduct and failed to reprimand attorney Timothy Fielder in docket number DA12,181 In
the Matter of Timothy L.Fielder.
6. The same case ofCookv. City of Topeka, 654 P. 2d 953 was used to show that clerk of the courts
are not subject to the doctrine of judicial immunity. At its core, the court's analysis involves a
determination as to whether the clerk was engaged in a judicial,quasi-judicial, or ministerial task
See id. At 957. If the complained of actions of the clerk are ministerial, judicial immunity does not
apply. See id. At 958.
One test used to determine whether a clerk of a court is engaged in a judicial, quasi-judicial
or ministerial task is to see if a statute imposes a duty upon the clerk to act in a certain wayleaving
the clerk no discretion. In Am.Jur.2d it is stated while "there is some conflict as to the judicial or
ministerial nature of certain specific duties of a clerk of a court; ... his duty is purely ministerial
when it is prescribed by statute." 15A Am.Jur.2d, Clerks Of Court Section 21, p. 156 gemphasis
supplied).
The case of Cook v. City of Topeka, 654 P. 2d 953 (Kan. 1982), the Supreme Court of Kansas should
also be used for attorneys Michael Gayoso, Stephen Phillips, Stanton Hazlett, and Timothy Grillot for
failing to fulfill their ministerial duties of properly investigating cases and Panel A and Panel B for
failing to allow the "Disciplinary Administrator Oversight Committee" to investigate complaints on
Robert Fleming who was their previous chair and failing to report other attorneys and judges for
misconduct under KRPC8.3(a)(b) and Rule. 2.15(A)(B)(C)(D) Responding to Judicial and Lawyer
Misconduct. The same case should be used for Panel A and Panel B of KANSASCOMMISSIONON
JUDICIALQUALIFICATIONSfor failing to follow Rule 1.1 Compliance with Law, Rule 2.11(A)
Disqualification, and Rule 2.15 (A) (B)(C)(D).
The case ofCookv. City of Topeka, 654 P.2d 953, 957 (Kan.1982) says "Aclerk may not escape
liability for illegal or improper performance of a ministerial task imposed by statute. Id. At 958. The
court went on to explain that the "quasi-judicial exception is applicable to discretionary duties of a
judicial nature." Since Panel A, Panel B, Michael Gayoso, Stephen Phillips, Stanton Hazlett, and
Timothy Grillot were not making judicial determinations of a judicial nature and they all failed to
properly carry out their ministerial tasks then no judicial immunity should apply to any officer of
the court when this happens and Petitioners are filing this verified pleading in accordance with
KSA. 60-901 and would like to have an "ORDER"of an "INJUNCTION"under KS.A.60-901 against
Michael Gayoso, Stephen Phillips, Stanton Hazlett, Timothy Grillot, Panel A, Panel B, and all 11th
judicial district judges to not be able to hear anyone's case who signed the "GRANDJURYPETITION"
due to conflict of interest under Rule 2.11(A) and KS.A.20-311d.
Page 10 of II
Petitioner is filing this case like the civil rights case of Monroe v, Pape, In Monroe, the Supreme
Court held that a police officer was acting "under color of state law" even though his actions
violated state law. This was the first case in which the Supreme Court allowed liability to attach
where a government official acted outside the scope of the authority granted to him by state law.
The element of this claim is that only "persons" under the statute are subject to liability. A state is
not a person subject to the suit but a state officer can be sued in his official capacity for prospective
or injunctive relief despite the fact that a suit against a government official in his official capacity
represents nothing more than a suit against the government entity itself. According to this a state
may not be sued for damages, but may be sued for declaratory or injunctive relief. Municipalities
and local governments are persons subject to suit for damages and prospective relief, but the
United States Government is not. Individual employees offederal, state, and local government
may be sued in their individual capacities for damages, declaratory or injunctive relief.
Respectfully Submitted by;

By: IslEric M. Muathe Eric M. Muathe, P. O. Box 224, Pittsburg, KS, 66762.
By: IslNoah
Day Noah Day, P. O. Box 224, Pittsburg, KS, 66762.
By: Is I Kasey King Kasey King, P. O. Box 224, Pittsburg, KS, 66762.
Page 11 of 11

Filed Grand Jury Petition May 19Th 2015

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Filed Grand Jury Petition May 19Th 2015

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

~[)L5nl~dP

IN THE DISTRICTCOURTOF CRAWFORDcOtJt#ff~~

IN THE MATTER OF THE

Kurtis Loy, Oliver Lynch, Robert Fleming, A.J. Wachter

GRAND JURY PETITION TO INVESTIGATE, DISQUALIFY, AND

GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICTCOURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

1"v1 ;If 1--1-

Email Address (Optional)

('5)"0 J ..A/. /1Il f'c/t

*Pursuant to K.S.A 22"':3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

Return Petitions To:

For Questions Call: (417) 434-0083

GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

c.~~~ So- \,(&J'

1// j.;iJ, \'

*Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES .

Return Petitions To:

GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

Email Address (Optional)

*Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

IFor Questions Calf: (417) 434-0083

GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

Email Address (Optional)

Return Petitions To:

to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762

For Questions Call: (417) 434-0083

GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

2. Guilty judges / parties attorneys

Email Address (Optional)

~~L\;:i~_<:"ffi\v N\.. ~\l~

each of the signers

signed above as the carrier

c/o Noah Day & Eric Muathe

(C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.

GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY. KANSAS

Email Address (Optional)

dOO ;(/ c6tJffJe.l{

to K.S.A 22~3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

Return Petitions To:

For Questions Calf: (417) 434-0083

GRAND JURY PETITlON* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

Email Address (Optional)

"Pursuant to K.S.A22:3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762

GRAND JURY PETITION*

TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

Ptfi5bv (~ / -r: 7(/;;:>. .<Sl\le r-k>\I\~ICdh~~l

*Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

For Questions Call: (417) 434-0083

GRAND JURY PETITION*

TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

fIIYIt~\~?~1 r'r lA d.eT/u ~ r:r oY)o : 0

1~D ~pJn(\~ t\~A.a?

't 'I t "-~ bA..~

~\c... N\.. ~Mt\t

*Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

Return Petitions To:

For Questions Call: (417) 434-0083

GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

Email Address (Optional)

Return Petitions To: