100%(1)100% нашли этот документ полезным (1 голос)

579 просмотров23 страницыWave propagation in elastic solids has a long and distinguished history. The early theoretical work is associated with names such as Navier, Poisson, Rayleigh and Kelvin.
During the last two or three decades there has been a remarkable revival of interest in the field. A large and growing number of original papers on both the experimental and the theoretical.
aspects of the subject is appearing in the scientific literature

Jun 15, 2015

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

Wave propagation in elastic solids has a long and distinguished history. The early theoretical work is associated with names such as Navier, Poisson, Rayleigh and Kelvin.
During the last two or three decades there has been a remarkable revival of interest in the field. A large and growing number of original papers on both the experimental and the theoretical.
aspects of the subject is appearing in the scientific literature

© All Rights Reserved

100%(1)100% нашли этот документ полезным (1 голос)

579 просмотров23 страницыWave propagation in elastic solids has a long and distinguished history. The early theoretical work is associated with names such as Navier, Poisson, Rayleigh and Kelvin.
During the last two or three decades there has been a remarkable revival of interest in the field. A large and growing number of original papers on both the experimental and the theoretical.
aspects of the subject is appearing in the scientific literature

© All Rights Reserved

Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 23

(1964) i, 88-i lo

STRESS

WAVES

IN S O L I D S

H. KOLSKY

Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A.

(Received 19June I963)

A large and growing number of original papers on both the experimental and the

theoretical aspects of stress wave propagation is appearing in the scientific literature, and

two international conferences solely concerned with the subject have been held during the

last five years. The purpose of this paper is to review recent experimental and theoretical

advances in the propagation of deformation waves of arbitrary shape through elastic and

anelastic solids, and also to attempt to outline the problems on which present efforts are

being directed and to predict probable lines of future development.

INTRODUCTION

The subject of wave propagation in elastic solids has a long and distinguished history.

The early theoretical work is associated with names such as Navier, Poisson, Stokes,

Rayleigh and Kelvin. At the beginning of this century, when the concept of an elastic

ether was finally abandoned, interest in the whole field died down; and with the exception

of seismological studies, which were largely concerned with the application of earlier

theory to rather complex physical situations, very little new work was done. During the

last two or three decades there has been a remarkable revival of interest in the field. A

large and growing number of original papers on both the experimental and the theoretical

aspects of the subject is appearing in the scientific literature, and two international conferences solely concerned with stress-wave propagation have been held during the last

five years (l-Z). At the end of this paper, references are given to a number of books, articles

and reviews (3-17) which have appeared in the last decade and which are concerned with

various aspects of the subject.

There are a number of reasons for this revival of interest, of which the most important

are: first, the availability of experimental apparatus with which stress waves can be

produced and detected; second, the practical engineering need for data on the behaviour

of materials at very high rates of loading when stress waves are inevitably generated;

third, the growing interest in the structure of solids, where high frequency stress waves

provide a powerful experimental tool for investigating the microscopic processes which

take place in a solid when it is deformed; and last (and unfortunately, not least) the

universal increase in armament research where the investigation of the response of

structures to large forces maintained for very short times plays such a prominent part.

One class of investigation in which there has been considerable and continuing interest

is that of the propagation of pulses of high frequency sinusoidal oscillations of very small

amplitude. This has in fact become a subject of its own, known as Ultrasonics, and in the

present article it is not proposed to consider in any detail either the many and important

results on the structure of solids and fluids which have been achieved by the use of this

technique, or the use of such pulse techniques for flaw detection in engineering components. T h e purpose of this paper is instead to review the recent experimental and

thcoretical advances in the propagation of waves of larger amplitude and arbitrary shape

through elastic and anelastic solids, to attempt to outline the problems on which present

efforts are being directed and to predict probable lines of future development.

88

89

From a theoretical standpoint the subject falls naturally into two parts which correspond

to whether or not the medium through which the stress wave is being propagated can be

considered to obey Hooke's Law. The experimental techniques used are generally similar

whether elastic or anelastic solids are being investigated, but the purpose of carrying out

experiments is often quite different in the two types of investigation. Thus, in principle,

any elastic wave problem can be treated theoretically when the values of the elastic

constants of the medium are known. In practice very few such problems indeed can be

solved, and experiments are carried out either to test the validity of approximate theories

or to obtain information about the behaviour of systems which are far too complicated for

theoretical studies even to be attempted. Such experimental investigations are then the

dynamic counterpart of the experimental stress analysis of engineering structures.

In the second type of investigation, where the solid through which the waves are being

propagated cannot be assumed to obey Hooke's Law, experiment plays a different role

as in nearly every case an "exact" theoretical treatment is of very limited validity since it

depends on a mathematical model of the anelastic behaviour of the solid. Now, for many

materials Hooke's Law is an extremely close approximation to the actual mechanical

behaviour of the solid when the deformations are sufficiently small, and the law is of the

same form, i.e. a linear one, for all elastic solids. In contrast, the various mathematical

representations of anelastic behaviour which have been used are approximate ones, which

describe specific solids, are of very limited validity, and often would appear to have no

physical validity at all. Thus experimental investigations are generally the only possible

method of determining the real behaviour of the materials, and theory can, at best, act

only as a general guide to the type of behaviour which may be expected.

Departures from Hooke's Law may manifest themselves in two ways: first, the stressstrain relation may depart from linearity and also be different for loading and unloading;

such behaviour is characteristic of metals strained" plastically" beyond their proportional

limit; second, the stress-strain relation may depend on the rate of straining so that the

material behaves in a manner analogous to that of a viscous fluid; such materials are called

viscoelastic, and viscoelastic effects are most clearly seen in high polymers such as rubber

and the many different plastics. As will be described later, many such viscoelastic materials

are "linear" in the sense that although they do not obey Hooke's Law, their behaviour

can be described by linear differential equations involving the stress, the strain, and their

derivatives with respect to time. This division into non-linear behaviour, which does not

depend on strain-rate, and linear viscoelastic behaviour, which does not depend on

amplitude, is convenient although often somewhat artificial. Under some conditions

many anelastic materials behave both in a non-linear and in a time-dependent manner so

that the stress-strain relation, or the constitutive equation, as it is often called, must be

expressed in the form of a non-linear differential equation involving stress, strain and time

and is often of considerable complexity.

However, since on the one hand the mechanical behaviour of metals is generally not

highly rate-dependent, and on the other hand most unfilled polymers and rubbers are

linearly viscoelastic for small deformations, theoretical studies in which the non-linearity

and the time-dependence are dealt with separately have considerable practical justification.

Waves travelling in a rate-dependent solid are termed viscoelastic waves, whilst waves

travelling in a solid which shows the phenomenon of yield, so that the stress-strain curve

is concave towards the strain axis, are termed plastic waves. When the stress-strain curve

is non-linear but curves towards the stress axis, i.e. becomes "stiffer" for large stresses

than for smaller ones, the nature of wave propagation is radically different from that of

either viscoelastic waves or of plastic waves.

When a mechanical pulse is propagated through such a medium, the velocity of propaga-

90

ii. KOLSKY

tion is greatcst h)r those parts of tile wave whosc amplitudes arc greatcst, and conscquently

the front of the disturbance becomes stccper and steeper :Is the pulse progresses through

thc medium. The final shape of the wave is then determincd by dissipative processes

which take place because of the intensc stress gradients produced in the wave front, and

often also depends on the microscopic structure of the medium. Such waves, which are

called shock waves, of course also occur in fluids.

In discussing and describing recent work in thc field of stress waves in this articlc, the

four types of problems outlincd above will be considered separately, viz: elastic waves,

viscoclastic waves, plastic waves and shock wavcs.

ELASTIC WAVFS

Almost the only problems for which a complete wave solution is available are the

following:

(a) TIlE INFINITE ISOTROPIC ELASTIC SOLID

Only two types of wave can propagate, namely, dilatational or P waves which travel with

the velocity ct = ~/[(k + ~G)/p] and distortional or S waves which travel with the velocity

c2 = x/(G/p), k is here the bulk modulus, G the shear modulus and p the density.

(b) TIlE SEMI-INFINITESOLID

In addition to the P and S waves, Rayleigh surface waves, which travel with a velocity

c, a little lower than that of S waves, are propagated parallel to the free surface. The ratio

G/c2 depends on the value of Poisson's ratio for the material and for real materials must lie

between o.874 and o.955.

(C) TIlE INFINITE PLATE

Lamb (18) has obtained complete solutions for two types of plane waves which he has

termed symmetrical and antisymmetrical waves. These are longitudinal and flexural in

character respectively, and unlike the other waves considered above, these waves are

dispersive, i.e. their velocity of propagation depends on their wavelength A, or rather on

A/d, where d is the thickness of the plate.

When A/d is very much greater than unity, symmetrical waves travel with the velocity

.~v/{E/p(l -v2)}, where E is Young's modulus and v is Poisson's ratio. On the other hand,

antisymmetrical, or flexural, waves, travel with vanishingly small velocities as A/d tends

to infinity. When A/d is very much smaller than unity, both symmetrical and antisymmetrical waves travel with velocities which asymptotically approach % the velocity of

Rayleigh surface waves.

(d) CYLINDRICAL BARS OF INFINITE LENGTH

Three types of wave can be propagated along such bars, namely: extensional waves,

torsional waves and flexural waves. Although the solution of this problem was first

produced by Poehhammer (i9) and Chree (2o) during the last century, it is only during

the last twenty years or so that numerical calculations based on this solution have been

made, or that the experimental and theoretical problems associated with the propagation

have been considered in any sort of detail. The theory shows that, in general, all these types

of waves are dispersive, and in addition that waves of any one wavelength may be propagated in a number of different "modes" along the cylinder. For longitudinal and torsional

waves these modes are associated with the presence of nodal cylinders where one component of the motion vanishes. For longitudinal waves the nodal cylinders correspond to

9x

the absence of motion in the radial direction, whereas for torsional waves they correspond

to no motion at all; the annuli on opposite sides of the nodal cylinder rotate in opposite

directions.

For the fundamental mode extensional waves travel with velocities which depend on

Poisson's ratio v and on the value of A/a, where a is the radius of the cylinder andA is the

wavelength. When A/a >>I, the waves travel with the velocity X/(E/p)= Co. When

A/a < I, they travel with the Rayleigh surface wave velocity G. For intermediate values of

A/a they travel at phase velocities between Co and c,.

Flexural waves in the fundamental mode travel at vanishingly small velocities as A/a

tends to infinity and at G asA/a tends to zero. Torsional waves travel at constant velocity

c2 = "v/(G/p) for all wavelengths so long as the propagation is in the fundamental mode.

Higher modes, whoever, show dispersion.

The theory of wave propagation in solid circular cylinders was extended by Ghosh (2 x)

to consider wave propagation along hollow cylinders. This problem was also considered

by Glebe and Blechschmidt (22), who obtained an approximate solution which is inaccurate at high frequencies. Hermann and Mirsky (23) and Greenspan (24) have evaluated

the dispersion curves resulting from Ghosh's solution. The problem is of interest in that

for very long wavelengths the hollow cylinder behaves as a rod, i.e. there is no dispersion,

and the velocity of propagation is ~/(E/p); whereas, for very short wavelengths it behaves

as a plate, and when the wavelength becomes short compared with the wall thickness of

the cylinder, the velocity of propagation approaches the Rayleigh surface wave velocity c,.

The extreme complexity of exact solutions in the theory of elastic wave propagation has

led to a number of "approximate" theories being developed. Instead of solving the elastic

equations for the prescribed boundary conditions these theories use physical considerations to determine the likely nature of the motion. The earliest of these was that due to

Rayleigh and Love, who modified the simple theory of propagation of extensional waves

along a rod to allow for the radial motion associated with the lateral expansions and

contractions produced by the finite value of Poisson's ratio. Other notable approximate

treatments are those due to Timoshenko (25) for flexural waves in beams where rotary

inertia and shear deformation are taken into account, and the theory due to Mindlin and

Hermann (26) for extensional waves in rods where allowance is made not only for radial

motion but also for radial shear. This theory has recently been further developed by

Mindlin and McNiven (27). An excellent review of the many other recent approximate

and "exact" approaches to elastic wave propagation is given in the article by Miklowitz

(i6).

Although considerable theoretical work has been carried out on elastic wave propagation, many important questions, even for the very simple geometries capable of analytical

treatment, remain largely unanswered. Thus, in the problem of wave propagation along

an infinite elastic cylinder, the Pochhammer-Chree solution shows that propagation can

occur in an infinite number of modes. How the energy of an arbitrary disturbance is

divided between these separate modes cannot, in general, be determined theoretically.

The theory for an infinite cylinder is based on the boundary condition that at the free

cylindrical surface both the normal stress and the shear stress shall vanish. For a finite

cylinder, however, we have the additional boundary conditions that the ends of the cylinder

shall be free from stress. As shown in Love (28) the Pochhammer-Chree solutions do not

correspond to such end conditions, and no exact solution for wave propagation in an

elastic cylinder of finite length has so far been obtained.

Another problem to which it is difficult to find a theoretical answer is the signalvelocity

of a disturbance along a cylinder of finite length. In an unbounded elastic medium waves

can travel with one of two velocities, the dilatational velocity ct and the distortional velocity

92

it. KOLSKV

C2. Consequently, when the end of a cylindrical elastic rod is struck, some energy" would

be expected to travel along it at the velocity c~ since a dilatational wave will travel out

from the point of impact, and a portion of the wavefr,nt (albeit a very small portion if the

length of the cylinder is very much greater than its radius) will reach the opposite end

without being reflected at the cylindrical boundary. Now the Pochhalnmer theory as

normally presented shows that the group velocity of longitudinal waves is never greater

than Co = ~/(E/p); and since co is considerably less than Q, the theory clearly, doesnot

take into account such precursor waves. Adem (29) would appear to have been the first to

point out that in addition to the progressive waves treated by Pochhammer, the equation

can be satisfied by solutions inw)lving complex wave numbers. Such solutions correspond

to waves which are attenuated exponentially with distance of travel. Although such

solutions will have no relevance for an infinite rod, they mav well make it possible to satisfy,

the condition of zero end stresses in a finite rod, and to account for the propagation of

disturbances at velocities greater than co.

Experimental work on testing the predictions of the Pochhammer-Chree theory and

seeing to what extent modes higher than the first are excited in practice, has been carried

out by' Davies (3 o) and subsequently by a number of other workers (31-33). In these

investigations pulses produced by impacts or by the detonation of explosives at the end

120

I O.

lOOt

.~-..

....

9o!

1

1

1

70!-

~ 5O

40

Z o;/ /

,oLY:

0

_

8t-~ _12;_ i 16:- ~ 20:-~24~

....

36

Time (microsec)

o b t a i n e d by F o u r i e r s y n t h e s i s . E x p e r i m e n t a l c u r v e ; :- calculated o r d i n a t e s ; - - u n d i s t o r t e d

pulse.

of elastic cylinders have been observed after they have travelled various distances. Various

types of pulse-shape, and cylinders covering a range of diameters have been used, and the

observations have all shown that, in practice, the fundamental mode is the one normally

excited and the predictions of pulse shape based on this mode are found to be in excellent

agreement with the observed results. Figure I shows a comparison, carried out by Hsieh

and the author (33), between the predicted and observed pulse shape in an experiment in

which a small lead azide charge was detonated at one end of a steel rod 0-2 5 in. in diameter

and 9 in. long; the observations of displacement were made at the opposite end of the rod.

On the same figure, the displacement-time curve corresponding to the initial pulse is

shown. It may be seen that the theory predicts, and experiment bears out, a considerable

lengthening of the pulse during propagation and the appearance of a series of high frequency

oscillations at the end of the pulse. These result from the lower group velocities of high

93

modes was found in the experiments listed above. Some workers (34-36 ) claim to have

found definite evidence for higher mode propagation, particularly at points close to the

source of the stress pulse. This is where such effects are to be expected, since the group

velocities of low frequency waves in the second and higher modes are very much smaller

than for the fundamental mode.

Experiments designed to measure the signal velocity for extensional waves in cylindrical

bars have been carried out by Hughes, Pondrom and Mims (38), by Kolsky (39) and by

Miklowitz and Nisewanger (34). These experiments have all shown that a small part of

the pulse does travel with the dilatational velocity cl as would be expected on physical

grounds. For cylinders where the ratio of length to radius is reasonably large (of the order

of xo or more), however, the amplitudes of the precursor waves are extremely small.

A considerable amount of experimental work has also been carried out on the propagation of flexural pulses along elastic bars (4o, 4Q. The results were found to be in good

agreement with the predictions of the exact Pochhammer theory and of the Timoshenko

(25) approximate treatment; the latter corresponds very closely to the exact theory for

the fundamental mode. Ripperger and Abramson (4 I) claim to have found a signal velocity

of cl for the propagation of flexural waves although, here again, the amplitude of the

precursor was found to be very small indeed.

Very little experimental work appears to have been carried out on torsional wave

propagation in rods. Experimental work of Owen and Davies (42) and of Krafft (43) shows

that no dispersion occurs and presumably all the energy travels in the fundamental mode.

In these experiments Owen and Davies (42) produced the torsional waves by transverse

impact of bullets on the side of the bar whilst Krafft (43) used axial impact with a rifled

bullet; torsional waves were produced as a result of the frictional resistance of the bar

to the rotational motion of the bullet.

The physical reason for the extreme complexity of elastic wave propagation in a

bounded elastic solid as compared with the relative simplicity of propagation in an

unbounded medium, is associated with the nature of the reflection of an elastic wave at a

free boundary. It may be shown--see for example (3)--that when a dilatational (P) wave

is obliquely incident on a free surface, the conditions for vanishing normal and shear

stresses at the boundary require that both a dilatational and a distortional (S) wave be

reflected. The direction in which these two reflected waves travel obeys Snell's Law,

i.e. the reflected P wave makes an angle equal to the angle of incidence; whereas the

"refracted" S wave travels in a direction such that the ratio of the sines of the angles to

the normal is equal to the ratio of the velocities of propagation of S and P waves in the

solid, i.e. the "refractive index" is cl/c2. The amplitudes of the reflected P wave and

refracted S wave depend on the angle of incidence and on the value of Poisson's ratio of

the elastic medium. Similarly, when an S wave is incident on a free boundary, a reflected

S wave and a refracted P wave are generated.

If a disturbance is set up at a point in a bounded elastic solid, in general both a P and

an S wave travel out from the point. As each of these waves reaches a free boundary, it

is reflected and produces two waves; and these, in turn, travel through the solid and are

reflected at its free boundaries to produce more waves. It may thus be seen that in any

bounded solid an extremely complicated wave pattern is generated even after very few

reflections have taken place.

The simple theory of reflection at a free boundary is adequate at all angles of incidence

less than ~r/2, although for wave trains of finite breadth, diffraction effects must be taken

into account. For glancing incidence of a P wave, however, the theory breaks down, since

the simple treatment predicts a reflected P wave, travelling parallel to the surface, which

94

11. KOLSKY

is of equal amplitude and opposite sign to the incident wave. Thus all motion in the

medium ceases, and we have the trivial solution of zero stress and zero particle velocity

everwvhere. The theory of reflection is based on the concept of a train of waves of infinite

breadth and of infinite duration, and equilibrium between the incident and reflectcd

waves is assumed to have been set up. The practical problem of reflection at glancing

incidence, however, is concerned with the transient conditions which obtain when a

dilatational wave reaches a boundary parallel to its direction of travel, and this problem

has been considered by Sauter (44), Goodier and Bishop (45) and Rocslcr (46). Sauter's

analysis is the most thorough and takes into account diffraction effects, which depend

on the wavelength, as well as on the geometrical conditions of reflection. The expressions

he derives are, however, extremely complicated and difficult to apply to real physical

situations. Goodier and Bishop (45) and Roesler (46) have treated the problem by using

a limiting process for the reflection of waves as the angle of incidence approaches 7r/2.

These analyses show that an S wave is generated, and the amplitude of the incident P

wave is attenuated as it progresses along the boundary.

Schardin (47) and Christie (48) have shown experimentally that such a trailing S wave

is in fact produced. The experimental technique employed by these investigators was to

propagate waves in plates of glass and other transparent elastic materials, and observe the

reflection at glancing incidence by means of a photoelastic technique; a series of highspeed photographs of the photoelastic pattern was taken while the pulse was being reflected. Christie (48 ) was able to make some quantitative measurements of the intensity

of the reflected S wave at very large angles of incidence and at glancing incidence, and he

found his experimental results were in good agreement with the numerical predictions of

the treatment developed by Roesler.

Other experimental investigations on elastic wave propagation which should be

mentioned are those carried out to simulate seismological situations. The specimens

employed have been either large blocks of concrete and granite (49-5o), where the threedimensional problems could be tackled directly, or plate specimens (49--52)- As shown by

Bishop (53), the propagation of waves in plates and two-dimensional propagation in

infinite solids are similar except for the numerical values of the elastic constants.

Most of this model seismological work has been carried out by the use of piezoelectric

or ferroelectric crystals as generators and receivers. The technique has differed from that

normally used in ultrasonics in that the crystals are pulsed by a high transient electrical

d.c. potential (> mooV) for a few microseconds, and individual pulses rather than

sinusoidal wave trains are generated. To ensure this, the crystals employed are ones whose

natural frequencies are remote from the predominant Fourier components in the voltage

pulse, so that "ringing" does not occur. Sherwood (52), in model seismological studies

with plates, used small explosive charges to generate the stress pulses, and condenserunits to detect and measure them.

It will be seen that most of the experimental work carried out on elastic waves hitherto

has been concerned with studying propagation in specimens of comparatively simple

geometrical shape, where the experimental results could be compared directly with

exact or "approximate" theoretical predictions. With increasing confidence in the

experimental techniques and in the interpretation of the observations, it should be

possible to study more complicated problems. One such problem that has been tackled

expcrimentally by Ripperger and Abramson (54) is the passage of longitudinal and

flexural elastic pulses across the discontinuity in cross-sectional area between two cylindrical bars of different diameters. This problem, which involves discontinuous boundary

conditions in stress and displacement at the junction between the two bars, cannot be

treated theorctically with any pretence of rigour. It is a good example of the type of

STRESSWAWS m SOLIDS

95

problem, the solution of which is likely to be of practical importance, but which only

experiment can hope to elucidate.

In addition to studying more complicated geometries, future work in elastic wave

propagation is likely to be concerned both theoretically and experimentally with the

diffraction phenomena. These occur when a mechanical pulse starts to be propagated in a

specimen, the lateral dimensions of which are of the same order of magnitude as the

wavelengths of the dominant components of the Fourier spectrum of the pulse. As in

optics or acoustics, a ray theory then becomes inadequate, and we enter the area which

for light is termed physical optics in contrast with geometrical optics. In the propagation

of elastic waves this generally involves the transition between conditions of plane strain

and conditions of plane stress; and when neither of these can be expected to apply, the

problem is one of considerable complexity even for specimens of very simple geometrical

shape.

VISCOELASTIC W A V E S

W h e n a specimen of any real solid is taken round a stresscycle, some of the mechanical

energy is lost as a result of dissipative mechanisms in the material. T o this extent the

concept of elasticwave propagation, as considered in the previous section isan idealization,

and the equations of motion should always include terms corresponding to dissipative

processes in the material. In practice, however, for most crystalline materials and for

many amorphous materials, such as glass, when the deformations are sufficientlysmall

the losses due to internal friction are extremely small; and the experimental results on

wave propagation are found to be in excellent agreement with the assumption of linear

elastic behaviour.

In contrast, many of the materials which are composed of giant organic molecules and

are known as high polymers, show very large internal dissipation. With the growing

engineering importance of these materials, which include plastics and rubber, considerable

effort has been directed in recent years to the study of the dynamic behaviour of structures

composed of such materials, and also to the problems of stress wave propagation through

such viscoelastic solids. In addition to the high mechanical dissipation that these materials

exhibit, they also show a very marked dependence of the values of the elastic" constants"

on the rate of application of stress. Thus, Young's modulus for a metal like steel will be

found to have substantially the same value, whether the measurements are carried out

in a conventional testing machine, or are obtained by measuring the velocity c of an elastic

pulse along a thin wire of the material and using the relation E = pc2. A similar comparison

for a filament of natural rubber will show the value of E in the wave experiment to be

considerably greater than that found in the testing machine. Under some conditions the

"dynamic" value obtained from the wave propagation experiment may be as much as a

thousand times the "static" value obtained in the testing machine. This dependence of

elastic modulus on time of loading means that from the point of view of wave propagation,

the material is dispersive, i.e. sinusoidal waves of high frequency have higher velocities of

propagation than low frequency waves. It is also found that the internal friction results in

high frequency waves being attenuated more rapidly than waves of lower frequency. As

a result of these two effects, i.e. velocity dispersion and frequency-dependent attenuation,

the shape of a mechanical pulse as it is propagated through a viscoelastic medium changes

rapidly even in the absence of the type of boundary effects discussed in the previous

section.

As mentioned in the introduction to this article, the type of viscoelastic response on

which most theoretical and experimental effort has hitherto been expended is that termed

linear viscoelastic behaviour. A linear viscoelastic solid may be defined in a number of

96

ii. KoI.SKY

different ways which can be shown to be mathematically equivalent (55). One definition

is that it is a material for which the stress components and tile strain components are

related by linear differential equations which involve tile stress, the strain, and their

derivatives with respcct to time. Thus when we consider uniaxial deformations, so that

only one component of stress a, and one component of strain E, are relevant, the stress-strain relation may be written as

Po-=

QE

(I)

i' = ao+al D + a 2 D 2 . . . .

and

Q = bo+blD+b2D 2....

D is here the operator d/dt and the a's and b's are numerical constants.

Historically, a linear viscoelastic solid was first defined by Boltzmann (56), in terms of

his principle of linear superposition of time-dependent mechanical response. In Boltzmann's treatment it is assumed that the mechanical response of a material depends on its

entire previous loading history ; and that if a specimen is subjected to a number of separate

deformations, the stresses at subsequent times will be the simple algebraic sum of those

which would have been found to be acting if the deformations had been carried out singly.

Alternatively, if the specimen is subjected to a series of stress cycles, the total resulting

deformations will be simply the sum of the individual deformations produced by the

separate stress cycles. Mathematically, the principle can be written for uniaxial stress

and strain as either

t

= .I f ( t - r)

--

dr,

(2)

ts3

w h e r e f ( t - r ) is called the stress relaxation function, and a and E are the stress and strain

respectively, or as

t

E=

f g(t-r)(do/dr)dr,

(3)

zo

Boltzmann's treatment is physically perhaps the most satisfactory approach to linear

viscoelastic behaviour, and the stress-relaxation function can be measured experimentally

by observing how the stress varies with time at constant extension, whilst the creep

function can be measured by observing the extension at constant stress. This is in contrast

with the operator functions P a n d Q in equation (i), which have to be fitted to experimental

results, a sufficient number of a and b terms being included to give a reasonable fit.

It may be shown that where there are a finite number of terms in the operator equation,

the behaviour can be represented by a mechanical model consisting of springs which are

perfectly elastic, and viscous elements, called dashpots, for which the stress is proportional

to the time rate of change of the extension, i.e. springs which are Hookean and dashpots

which obey Newton's Law of Viscosity. One simple model of this type is the Maxwell

model, which consists of a spring in series with a dashpot. For this model P = a0 + al D

(and all the other a's are zero) and Q = bl D (and all the other b's are zero). Another simple

model is the Kelvin-Voigt model which consists of a spring connected across a dashpot.

For this model P is a constant and Q = bo+biD.

It is found (57) that real viscoelastic solids, such as rubbers and plastics, behave in a

much more complicated manner and can be described by such simple models only when

STRESSWAVESIN SOLIDS

97

a narrow spectrum of loading times is involved, i.e. when the ratio between the longest

time and the shortest time that is relevant is not more than, say, so.

The disadvantage of the integral representation as derived from the Boltzmann superposition principle is that it leads to difficult integral equations when k is applied to specific

problems. The difficulties with the use of the operator method are first, that finding the

appropriate operators involves considerable computation and curve fitting, and second,

that if a large range of times has to be covered, the P and Q operators must each contain a

considerable number of terms. This means that in trying to tackle a specific problem

one may be faced with differential equations of the fifth, sixth or higher order, and these

may prove quite intractable. There is another approach to linear viscoelastic behaviour,

namely the use of complex elastic moduli. This again mathematically is equivalent to the

methods outlined above and hence inherently involves many of the same difficulties, but

for many purposes, and particularly wave propagation, it is extremely convenient.

The computations which are required when this method is applied to specific problems,

are generally in the form of the summation of Fourier series, and electronic computer

programmes, as well as numerical methods which use hand machines, are readily available

for carrying out computations of this type.

When a linear viscoelastic solid is subjected to a stress o that varies sinusoidaIIy with

time at an angular frequency p, the strain produced will vary sinusoidally with time at

the same frequencyp; but in general there will be a phase lag ~ between the strain and the

stress.

At any one frequency the phase lag 8, and the ratio between the stress amplitude o0,

and the strain amplitude 0, will be constants independent of the absolute values of the

amplitude. Using complex notation we may write

= o0 exp (ipt),

and

so that

or

o/ = (o0/e0) exp (i~) = E1 + iE2,

a = (Et + iE2).

(4)

Here E, and E2 are termed the real and imaginaryparts of the complex modulus E. It

may be seen that gz/g, = tan ~ and that o0/0 = ~/(E~ + E~); this ratio is often denoted by

E*.

Now E* and tan8 are quantities which can be obtained directly from vibration experiments and, if their values are known over a sufficiently wide range of frequencies, the

mechanical response of the solid to any uniaxial mechanical deformation can be calculated

by Fourier synthesis.

We now return to the problem of wave propagation in such a linear viscoelastic solid.

If we consider the simplest type of propagation, namely a longitudinal wave travelling in

the x direction along a thin rod, where the effects of lateral inertia may be neglected,

Newton's second law of motion gives the relation

ao/ax

;(a2u/at2),

(5)

where p is the density of the rod and u is the displacement in the x direction. Equation (5)

will hold whatever the stress-strain relation may be.

For a stress which is varying sinusoidally with time in a linear viscoelastic solid, we

may use relation (4), so that (5) becomes

since

= au/ax.

(6)

98

H. KOLSKY

and a wave travelling in the direction of increasing ,v is

u = u,,exp[-oa'+ip(t

- x c)],

where

,"-=

(E*;>)'Zsec(8/2), !

and

(p/c) tan

:=

[(E2/E , = tan8

(a/z);

and

E*=

(7)

(s)

v'(E~+E~)].

Thus, if we know the value of E I and E2, or of E* and tall 8 at any frequency p, equations

(7) and (8) give us the phase velocity c, with which such a sinusoidal wave is propagated,

and the coefficient ~, with which the amplitude of the wave is attenuated with increasing

x as the wave progresses along the rod.

Now since the principle of superposition is applicable, any disturbance travelling along

the rod may be considered as the sum of a spectrum of Fourier components, and the

propagation of the pulse can be represented as a Fourier integral. Thus we can express

the displacement pulse produced at the origin, by the relation

u = j Ap exp (ipt) dp,

O

where Ap is in general complex; then at any distance x along the rod we have

u = j A, exp [ - c~x + ip(t - x/c)] dp.

(9)

In order to solve the specific problem of a mechanical pulse propagated along a viscoelastic rod, where the shape of the pulse is known at one end of the rod, we must first make

a Fourier analysis of the initial pulse. The cosine and sine terms in this analysis give the

real and imaginary parts respectively of Ap in equation (9). We must also know the values

of c and ~, or E* and tan8, over the frequency range covered by the relevant Fourier

components (for a reasonably smooth pulse fifty Fourier components give an extremely

close fit, and the viscoelastic properties need to be known over a range of frequencies of

this order). The Fourier integral in equation (9) can then be approximated by a Fourier

sum, and the shape of the pulse at any distance x along the rod can be computed.

The author (58) has carried out a number of such computations, and the results of these

were compared with experimental measurements of pulse shapes in viscoelastic rods.

Figure 2 shows such a comparison between theory and experiment. In this experiment the

pulse was produced by a small explosive charge detonated at one end of a polyethylene

rod 6o cm long and 1.25 cm in diameter. The shape of the pulse arriving at the other end

of the rod was measured with a condenser unit. It may be seen that the shape computed

from the response of the material to stresses which vary sinusoidally with time agrees well

with that observed in this experiment. In the experiment a certain amount of geometrical

dispersion was produced as a result of lateral inertia effects in the bar. These were discussed

in the previous section. It was found, however, that this could be allowed for by carrying

out the computations for a value of x slightly greater than the actual length of the bar.

In the treatment described above, the experimentally measured values of c and c~, or

of E* and tan3, have to be inserted in the computation, so that the measured properties

of the specific solid under investigation have to be used. Now, for a large class of viscoelastic solids over a considerable range of frequencies and for a range of temperatures

99

STRESS W A V E S I N SOLIDS

only an approximation, the validityof which is more justifiedfor some solids than for

others. If, however, we assume that tan3 is in fact independent of frequency and is small

compared with unity, it may be shown (I I, 5 8) that the modulus E* at frequency p can

be approximated to by the relation

E'=

log,(p/po)],

E~[z4 2ta__n3zr

where Eg is the value of E* at some reference frequency P0. From equation (8) we then

have

,,o,

and

~ -- P [I - tan

~r 3 lg* (P/P)] tan ~ '

and, since tan3 < I,

"~"

Kp,

(II)

where K = tan3/2Co.

950

900

850

'+l

o

-6

IrO

Log(#po)

I

20

30

Figure 2. Velocity and attenuation for polyethylene rods. Curve I: Phase velocity (m/see);

Curve 2 : Log ct.

Thus to a first approximation we should expect to find that c plotted against logp should

give a straight line of gradient (tanS)fir, and log~ plotted against logp should give a straight

line of gradient unity. Figure 2 shows such plots for the experimental results obtained

by Hillier (59) for sinusoidal waves of different frequencies travelling along filaments of

polyethylene, and it may be seen that these results agree very well with the predictions

of the above approximations.

If we take equations (IO) and (i x) to represent the propagation constants of a class of

viscoelastic solids, it is possible to treat in non-dimensional form a number of problems

concerned with the propagation and reflection of waves in viscoelastic solids. Such

calculations have been shown to lead to predictions which are borne out by experiment

(58).

IOO

11. KOLSKY

nuxnber of interesting phenomena which are observed when mechanical pulses are

propagated through them. Thus, as seen above, both the velocity of propagation and the

attenuation increase with increasing frequency, so that the high-frequency components

of a pulse travel faster and are attenuated more rapidly than those of lower frequency.

As a result, a pulse, which is initially symmetrical in shape, becomes asymmetrical

(Figure 3) and at the same time becomes broader and flatter as it travels through the solid.

!

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

c

>.

~5.-v

_,

o

-~

E

<

I00

200

300

400

50C

Line (microsec)

Figure 3. Comparison between observed pulse ill polyethylene rod and ordinates calculated by

Fourier synthesis. - - observed pulse ; o points obtained by Fourier synthesis.

Another point of interest concerns the " s h a p e " of a pulse travelling in a viscoelastic

medium. In an elastic solid the displacement in a plane wave travelling in the direction

of decreasing x can be written as

u = f(x + ct),

(z 2)

w h e r e f is an arbitrary function of the argument (x + ct).

T h e particle velocity v is then given by

v =

(I3)

~- c / ' ( x + c t ) ,

~u/~t

where the dash indicates differentiation with respect to the argument (x + ct); the strain E

is given by

=

I-O I-

~u/'?:x

. . . .

=/'(x-'-ct),

_._~_.

11

-400

-200

(z4)

,

-=.

7o

200

400

Time (mlcrosec)

I'igure 4. Comparison of the pulse shapes of displacement, particle velocity, stress and strain

in a viscoelastic rod.

IOI

and the stress by o = E,, where E is the appropriate elastic modulus, so that

o

(IS)

= Ef'(x+ct).

From (13), (14) and (iS) it may be seen that v, c, and a are allof the same pulse shape,

and the displacement is proportional to the integral of these pulses.

For viscoelasticsolids this is no longer true since c and E are time-dependent, and the

pulse shapes will not be the same for stress,strain,and particlevelocity. From an experimental point of view this can lead to difficultiessince it is often possible to measure only

strain or particle displacement when, for example, a knowledge of the stress is required.

Furthermore, in some experimental techniques, notably the photoelastic technique, it

is not quite clear whether the pulse shape observed is that of stress or that of strain. For

elastic studies this does not matter once the detectors have been calibrated; but when

viscoelastic materials are used, and much photoelastic work is done with such materials,

it is not only the amplitude but the shape of the pulse which is suspect.

Fortunately, for smooth pulses the differences in pulse shapes are generally not too

large, as may be seen from Figure 4, which shows the results of a recent calculation

carried out by S. S. Lee and the author (6o) on pulse propagation in polyethylene. The

g

>.

o

35

;~

ioo

/~' 20~,

t-

Time (microsec)

o r incident pulse ; o, reflected pulse.

pulse shapes for v, Eand o are calculated for a prescribed distribution of the displacement u.

In the Figure the shapes are given non-dimensionally; the displacement is given as u/u ~o,

where u~o is the value of the particle displacement after the pulse has passed, and the

particle velocity, strain, and stress are given as V/Vo, c/0, and ~/o0 respectively, where the

zero subscript denotes the maximum value of each quantity.

Reflection of a pulse at the interface between two viscoelastic solids, or between a

viscoelastic and an elastic solid, is also of interest, in that the reflection coefficient depends

on the values of pc where p is the density and c is the velocity of propagation; and since

8

102

H. K O L S K Y

the latter varies with the frequency for a viscoelastic solid, the reflected and transmitted

pulses can have shapes quite different from that of thc incident pulse.

Thus, consider the reflection of a pulse travelling from a viscoelastic solid into an

elastic solid which has a value of pc independent of frequency; let this value be poCo.

Assume that the value of pc for the viscoelastic solid is less than poco for low frequencies

and greater than poco for high frequencies. When a pulse is reflected at the boundary

between two such solids, the low frequency components will be reflected in one phase

and the high frequency components in exactly the opposite phase. The results of such

reflection are shown in Figure 5, where it may be seen that the reflected pulse is S-shaped

although the incident pulse was unidirectional. 'l'his calculation was carried out bv S. S.

Lee and the author (6o) for the reflection of the pulse produced in a rod of polymethylmethacrylate (Perspex, Lucite) I ao cm in length, when a very sharp blow was applied to

one end of it. The resultant pulse was reflected at the other end, which was in contact with

an elastic rod of the appropriate Young's moduh, s. In the Figure the reflected pulse is

shown at twenty times its actual size.

All the problems of viscoelastic wave propagation that have been considered here

were concerned with uniaxial waves so that only one component of stress and one component of strain were relevant. The extension of the treatment to three dimensions is, in

theory, quite straightforward, and has an exact parallel in the development of threedimensional elasticity from the uniaxial treatment. However, instead of having two elastic

constants, e.g. the bulk and shear moduli, we must now have two time-dependent relations.

Thus, in the Bohzmann treatment, we would have two stress-relaxation functions or two

creep functions, and in the differential operator treatment we would need a P and Q for

shear and a P ' and Q' for dilatation.

In fact, it seems highly probable that volume changes in all homogeneous viscoelastic

solids are substantially elastic, and viscoelastic behaviour is confined to shear deformation.

The experimental evidence on which this conclusion is based is, however, somewhat

sparse, and more experimental work must be done before the assumption of perfectly

elastic dilatational response can be regarded as universally valid.

Wave propagation in non-linearly viscoelastic materials has hitherto received very

little attention either theoretically or experimentally. Some efforts in this direction will

be described in the next section, which discusses plastic waves, and also in the concluding

section of this article.

PLASTIC WAVFS

Plastic waves are associated with the phenomenon of yield in solids, and the theory of

their propagation has been developed chiefly in connection with the response of metal

structures to large transient stresses which produce plastic deformation. If the stresses

are applied very rapidly, inertia effects cannot bc neglected; and the problem has to be

treated in terms of wave propagation.

The first treatment of this type of problem was published by Donnell (6I) in i93o.

Donnell considered the propagation of a longitudinal disturbance along a thin rod of a

plastic strain-hardening material. The disturbance was produced by suddenly applying

a constant stress a to one end of the rod and maintaining this stress. Donnell assumed for

simplicity that the material had a bi-linear stress-strain curve, i.e. that the material was

elastic for stresses up to the yield point %, the value of Young's modulus being El, and

that for stresses greater than % the stress-strain curve had a second linear portion, the

gradient of which was EE(E2 < EO.

If a is less than the yield point %, a steep-fronted elastic pulse of constant amplitude

a0 is propagated along the rod at constant velocity co = ~/(E1/p). If, however, a > a0, there

IO 3

will be two wave fronts. The elastic wave of amplitude a0, the front of which is travelling

at velocity Co, will be followed by a "plastic" wave of amplitude a which travels at the

lower velocity .v/(E2/p); the stress distribution along the rod is thus in the form of two

steps. The height of the first step is a0 and that of the second, a.

After Donnell's paper, the subject of plastic wave propagation appears to have received

little further attention until the beginning of the Second World War when formal solutions

of the problem for more general stress-strain relations were obtained independently in

England, the United States and the Soviet Union. (See references 3, 6, 9, [3, 62, 7I.)

The problem can be treated in either Lagrangian or Eulerian co-ordinates, and both

have been used in the various derivations of the solutions. We will here outline the

problem as treated by yon Karman (62), who used Lagrangian co-ordinates. Von Karman

considered an infinitely long wire, one end of which was suddenly given a velocity V at

time t = o, and this velocity was maintained for all t > o. As in Donnell's treatment, it is

assumed that the wire has a linear stress-strain relation up to a critical value of the stress

ao, the yield point; for stresses a > a0, the stress o is assumed to be a univalued function

of the strain E so long as a is increasing, and this function is assumed to be independent

of the rate of straining. It is also assumed that the effects of radial motion of the wire can

be neglected so that geometrical dispersion effects (of the type discussed in an earlier

section of this article) could be ignored.

The solution of this problem which satisfies the equation of motion and the prescribed

boundary conditions is that, at any time t, the distribution of strain along the wire can

be divided into three distinct regions.

(i) From the end of the wire x = o to the "plastic wave front", x = C1 t, the strain has

a constant value ~1. Here C1 = % / ( S 1 / p ) , where St is the tangent modulus of the

engineering stress-strain curve at a strain cl. It is thus the quantity do'/dE at E = ~,,

where a' is the nominal stress, i.e. the force applied divided by the cross-sectional

area of the undeformed wire.

(ii) From x = C1 t to x = Cot, the strain ~ decreases monotonically in such a way that

x = Ct at every point where pC 2 = da'/d~( = S), i.e. each value of the strain travels

down the wire with a velocity corresponding to the tangent modulus of the stressstrain curve at that value of the strain. Here Co= a/(E/p), where E is Young's

modulus for elastic deformations.

(iii) At x = cot the strain has a value c0. This is the maximum elastic strain that the

wire can maintain and corresponds to the yield stress a0.

For x > Cot, the wire is undisturbed.

The relation between the constant value of the strain ~I between the end of the wire

and the plastic wave front, and the velocity V at which the end of the wire is being extended

is

"t

--

f( \Pil

d,.

(I6)

S is the gradient of the stress-strain curve do/d~ and is a function of ~. The type of strain

distribution described above is shown by the broken curve in Figure 6.

The earliest experimental verification of the theory was carried out by Duwez and

Clark (63), who measured the distribution of permanent strain in a copper wire which

had been impulsively stretched by a falling weight. They found that the relation between

the permanent strain E1 and velocity of stretch 1/"given by equation (]6) was well borne

out by their experimental results, and the general distribution of strain along the wire

was in reasonably good agreement with the theory. A more detailed examination showed,

I0 4

II. KOLSKY

however, some serious discrepancies between theory and experiment, and ira particular

the length of region of constant strain, behind the plastic wave front, was found to be

shorter than predicted, and even within this region the strain was not quite constant.

These discrepancies were at first attributed to the complex wave patterns which arc set

up during the unloading of the wire. A careful analysis showed, however, that the unloading waves could only account in part for these discrepancies, and that the inadequacy

of the theory in explaining these results lay in the assumption that the stress-strain curve

was independent of the rate of straining, and the use of the " s t a t i c " stress-strain curve

of the wire was unjustified.

The applicability of a theory of plastic wave propagation based on a rate-independent

stress-strain curve was further placed in doubt by tile experiments of Bell (64), Sternglass

and Stuart (65), and Alter and Curtis (66). These workers investigated the propagation of

a small amplitude longitudinal disturbance along a bar which was already stressed beyond

its elastic limit. According to the rate-independent theory as outlined above, such a

disturbance should travel at the velocity v'(S/p), where S is the tangent modulus of the

stress-strain curve at the pre-stress of the bar. Since the yield point had been exceeded,

S was considerablv less than E, Young's modulus for the bar, and the superimposed

disturbance would be expected to travel at a velocity considerably less than co, the velocity

of elastic waves. Experimentally they found however, that the disturbance travelled in all

oooa,<,

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

-.

-~

~_~ .... .

'

OC06i

;

,.

',

Rc/te ;ndependent

"~

RGte de;~ender,

0004

.;

,Y,

,C:

!5

._~

cases at the velocity of elastic waves Co. It would thus appear that when the additional

transient stress is applied, the material follows a different stress-strain relation from that

observed at lower rates of straining, i.e. the stress-strain curve is rate dependent.

A proper treatment of the problem would thus involve considering a medium which

is both non-linear and strain-rate dependent, i.e. a non-linear viscoelastic solid. As

mentioned earlier, the mathematical treatment of wave propagation in such a material

is extremely involved, and very few problems of this type have been treated hitherto.

One reasonably successful attempt is due to Malvern (67), who considered the propagation

of plastic waves in a wire for which the stress was a function of both the longitudinal strain

and the strain rate i. He expressed the relation for the plastic component of the strain

~2 a s

E~2 = g(m,),

(I7)

IO 5

EE, =

(,8)

at =

")'

(19)

We also have the equation of motion

a~

a 2u

bv

= P

ax = p

(20)

aE

a--t

a 2U

=

a,/.)

O x a t - Ox

(21)

Equations (19) , (2o) and (21) form a system of three first-order differential equations

which can, in principle, be solved if the form of the function g(G, e) is known. For illustrative purposes Malvern used a very simple form for this function, namely

g(~,e) = K [ ~ - f ( ~ ) ]

(22)

From equation (17) it may be seen that G, =f(E) is the stress-strain relation at zero rate

of strain, i.e. the " s t a t i c " stress-strain relation, and equation (17) now implies that the

excess dynamic stress (G- a,) is proportional to the rate of straining.

In order to carry out a numerical calculation for hardened aluminium Malvern used

a hyberbolic relation, namely

f ( , ) = (2 x lO 4 - IO/,)Ib/in 2,

together with E = xoTlb/in 2 and p --- 2. 5 x 1o-41bsec2/in4.

T h e value of the yield point was taken as io41b/in 2 so that up to this value of the stress,

the deformations were elastic. K was taken to be Io6sec - 1. This gives a i o % increase in

stress over the " s t a t i c " value at a strain rate of 2oosec- 1, and this was the order of magnitude observed experimentally with metals.

Using the above values, Malvern calculated the strain distribution in a thin rod of

aluminium where one end is suddenly set into motion by a tensile impact at a velocity of

600in/sec, and this velocity is maintained constant. The distribution of strain io2. 4 microseconds after the beginning of the impact is shown in Figure 6. On the same figure the

broken line shows the distribution of the strain which would obtain if the stress--strain

relation of the material were rate-independent. The most notable difference between the

two curves is that for the rate-dependent material no region of constant strain and no

"plastic wave f r o n t " are present. It is possible that, with more sophisticated forms for

g(a, c) and f(e), a strain distribution which showed an approximation to a strain plateau

could be obtained, but Malvern suggests that any plausible form for f(c) is unlikely in

itself to produce a region of constant strain. The Malvern type of treatment accounts for

the experimental effects observed for super-imposed pulses (64, 65, 66) but would appear

to be inadequate for describing the observed nature of the strain distribution in the

vicinity of the end of the wire.

A number of investigations have been carried out to measure the extent to which the

stress-strain relation of metals depends on the rate of strain (68). At moderate rates of

strain this does not involve any particular difficulty, but at the rates of strain which are

io6

H. KOLSKY

relevant in plastic wave propagation, the cxperimcntalist tends to find himself travelling

in a vicious circle. Any apparatus designed to measure the stress-strain behaviour at

these rates of strain results in stress waves being generated because of the inertia of the

various parts of the apparatus and of the test specimen itself. Any attempt to interpret the

experimental observations requires an understanding of plastic wave propagation in a

strain-rate dependent material which in turn must be based on a knowledge of the stress,

strain-rate relation which the experiment has been designed to measure.

One method of resolving this dilemma for soft metals was devised by the author (69),

who used specimens in the form of thin discs, which were placed between two steel bars

along which stress pulses were propagated. Here, the inertia of the specimen and plastic

wave propagation in it could be neglected, and since wave propagation in the steel bars

was elastic, it could be treated analytically. This method has subsequently been used and

modified by a number of workers, and one of the most careful investigations of this type

has recently been carried out by Davies and Hunter (7o). The main drawback of the

method lies in the presence of frictional effects between the specimen and the bars ; such

effects are difficult either to eliminate or to allow for.

Another apparatus to measure stress-strain relations at very high rates of strain was

developed by L. S. Douch and the author (71). }Iere, rods of copper, aluminium, and an

aluminium alloy were fired from an air gun and impinged axially on one end of a steel bar.

16.00C - - . -

14.00C

12,00C

tb

IO.OOC

800C / /

6000't"

i

4000[

2000[

(0"02

0'04

0'06

Strain ~.

0.08

0"10

Figure 7. Stress-strain curves for aluminium. - - d y n a m i c cur~'e; - - - static curve; experimental points.

A range of velocities of impact was covered, and the values of stress were determined by

measuring the amplitudes of the elastic waves propagated along the steel bar, whilst the

corresponding plastic strains were measured by examining the specimens after impact.

Figure 7 shows a comparison between the stress-strain curve for annealed aluminium

bars obtained by this method and the "static" stress-strain curve of similar bars measured

in a conventional testing machine. It may be seen that there is a small but definite strainrate effect.

In this work (7 I) the experimental results for plastic-wave propagation in the metal

bars were compared with the predictions of the simple theory which ignored strain-rate

effects. Instead, however, of using the static stress-strain curve, as Duwez and Clark did,

the "dynamic" stress-strain curves of the t3Tc shown in Figure 7 were employed, and

it was found that ti~e agreement achieved between theory and experiment was considerably

STRESSWAVESIN SOLIDS

IO7

better. A rate-independent treatment can thus be used for describing plastic wave propagation to a reasonable degree of approximation if stress-strain relations appropriate to

the actual rates of straining are used.

Very much more work, both theoretical and experimental, needs to be done on plastic

wave propagation. Probably the most urgent problem is the extension of the theory,

continuing the work of Malvern, to include strain-rate effects. The interaction of elastic

unloading waves and plastic waves needs further study, since in any practical problem

such unloading waves must inevitably be propagated. Finally much of the work has

hitherto been concerned with one-dimensional problems, and the extension of both

theoretical and experimental studies to more problems in three-dimensional plastic wave

propagation should lead to many interesting and novel results.

SHOCK WAVES IN SOLIDS

In the previous section it was seen that plastic waves can be propagated through

materials for which the tangent modulus S decreases with increasing strain. When,

however, a disturbance is propagated through a medium for which S increases with

increasing strain, large strains travel at a higher velocity than lower strains so that the

large strains soon reach the front of the disturbance and a shock front is built up. Such

shock waves are not normally produced in metallic bars or rods since the stress-strain

curve under these conditions is normally concave towards the strain axis, i.e. S decreases

with increasing ~. Some metals, however, e.g. nickel-chrome steel, have a point of inflection in their stress-strain curves so that for sufficiently large strains shock-fronts should

be produced. This problem has been treated theoretically by White and Griffis (72) and

by Lee and Tupper (73), but no experimental work appears to have been carried out to

investigate the effect. K. W. Hillier and the author (74) have shown that for a number of

high polymers, such as rubber and nylon, the dynamic tangent modulus increases rapidly

with strain; shock fronts might therefore be expected to be formed in filaments of these

materials. The viscoelastic behaviour of such high polymers rather complicates the

problem, and experimental work will be required to investigate whether or not such

shock fronts are, in fact, generated.

All the experimental and most of the theoretical work on shock waves has hitherto been

concerned with the propagation of very intense plane compressive disturbances through

blocks or slabs of solids. The relevant modulus for elastic waves of this type is k + ]G,

where k is the bulk modulus and G is the shear modulus, and this is the value of S = do/d~

for waves of sufficiently small amplitude. For metals, as the stress amplitude exceeds the

yield point, the value of S drops as a result of plastic flow in shear, and plastic waves are

propagated. At even greater stress amplitudes, however, S begins to increase again as a

result of the increase in the bulk modulus k at large stresses. [Such increases of k with

pressure have been investigated by Bridgman (75).]

As soon as pressures for which S increases with E are reached, shock waves can be

propagated, although they may be preceded by elastic and plastic waves. At sufficiently

high pressures, however, the value of S will exceed k + -gG and the shock wave front will

overtake the elastic wave front. Pack, Evans and James (76) have studied the shock waves

propagated in blocks of metals when large explosive charges were detonated in contact

with a free surface of the block. They found that at the pressures produced by the explosive,

the shock waves in lead travelled faster than the elastic waves, whilst in steel the elastic

waves were ahead of the shock wave front. The increase of bulk modulus with increasing

hydrostatic pressure is not confined to metals, and shock waves can also be generated in

non-metallic solids. Shreffler and Deal (77) have studied shock-wave propagation in a

glass-like plastic as well as in a number of metals.

108

H. KOLSKY

Much information about the behaviour of solids at pressures higher than any that can

be achieved in other ways, has been obtained from shock wave studies, and an illuminating

discussion of such investigations together with a list of relevant references will be found

in a recent review article by Duvall (77).

CONCLUSION

It will have been seen from the foregoing sections that work on the propagation of stress

waves has been carried out by workers who have approached the problem from a number

of points of view. There is first the mathematical approach, where for more than a century

the field has provided challenging boundary value problems in applied mathematics.

Until very recently almost the entire mathematical effort in this direction has been concerned with elastic wave problems, but during the last two decades more and more

problems on plastic and viscoelastic wave propagation have been tackled. These studies

have been greatly facilitated by the advent of electronic computers which have made

numerical solutions possible for problems which would otherwise be quite intractable.

A second approach is that of the structural engineer, whose interest in stress waves

results from the necessity of designing structures which will withstand large transient

loads, where an analysis of the stress distribution which ignores inertia effects can lead to

completely erroneous predictions. The object of this type of investigation is to ensure that

critical stresses are not exceeded by any impact that the structure may have to withstand,

and the method of determining this is unlikely to be rigorous mathematically for any but

the very simplest cases, and in general will involve experimental investigations.

A third approach is that of the engineer who is studying the dynamic response of

engineering materials at very high loading rates. He may not be interested in stress waves

per se, but any attempts he makes to measure the dynamic stress strain characteristics of

his specimens result in waves being propagated in his measuring apparatus, and stresswave considerations are required to interpret his experimental results.

Last, there is the physicist who is interested in the microscopic structure of solids. Ite

uses stress waves, either in the form of ultrasonic pulses or as shock waves of high intensity,

as a tool for studying the effects of impurities in crystals, or of the motion of dislocations

in a crystal lattice, or of the effect of large pressures on the electrical properties of solids,

or simply for measuring the equation of state at very high pressures. Closer co-operation

between these many disciplines should lead to even more rapid advances in the subject.

An experimental application of stress waves which has so far not been mentioned in

this review is the use of large stress pulses, produced by high-speed impacts or the

detonation of explosive charges, to the study of brittle fracture. An account of these

investigations will be found in the book by Rinehart and Pearson (4) and in an article by

the author (78). One advantage that this technique offers is that stress distributions can

be set up which could not be achieved in any other way. For example, the interior of a

specimen can be momentarily in tension while all its boundaries are stress-free. Another

advantage of the method is that the stress is maintained for so short a time that fractures

cannot grow and traverse the specimen, hence a vast number of fracture nuclei can often

afterwards be seen in the specimen, all of which started to grow independently duringthe

stress-wave loading.

In the whole field of stress-wave studies, perhaps the most important and the most

challenging problem that faces us at present is the treatment of stress-wave propagation

in non-linear, time-dependent materials. This problem has arisen in two ways; on the

one hand, the strain-rate dependence of metals requires such a treatment, and on the

other, non-linear behaviour in viscoelastic solids such as rubbers and polymers must also

STRESSWAVESIN SOLIDS

I09

be treated by such a theory. T o some extent the emphasis in the two problems has been

different, in that strain-rate effects in metals are generally small whilst the non-linearity

is large; whereas, with viscoelastic solids it is often the non-linearity which is small,

whilst the rate-dependence is the dominant feature. T h e experimental and the theoretical

difficulties are however, very similar, and any advances made in the solution of one

problem are likely to help in the solution of the other. An investigation by S. R. Bodner

and the author (79) on stress-wave propagation in lead showed that this material had to

be considered as a non-linear viscoelastic solid, but some of the effects observed could be

treated in terms of linear viscoelasticity, whilst others could be accounted for by nonlinear treatment where time effects were ignored.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

It is a pleasure to acknowledge the support of the Advanced Research Projects Agency,

Department of Defense under A R P A Contract Sd-86 with Brown University, Providence,

R.I.

REFERENCES

I. International Symposium on Stress Waves in Materials x96o (N. Davids, ed.). New York:

Interscience.

2. Stress Waves in/Inelastic Solids. Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium held at Brown University

x963. Springer Verlag (in press).

3. H. KOLSKYI953 Stress Waves in Solids. Oxford : Clarendon Press (Dover reprint in press).

4. J. S. RiNmt~r and J. PEARSON X959 Behavior of Metals under Impulsive Loads. Cleveland,

Ohio : Amer. Soe. for Metals.

5. W. M. EWXNC,W. S. JARt)~rSKYand F. PRESSI957 Elastic waves in Layered Media. New York:

McGraw-Hill

6. W. GOLDSMXTItX960Impact. London: Edward Arnold.

7. R. M. DAVI~ x956 Surveys in Mechanics, G. I. Taylor 7oth Anniversary Volume. Cambridge

University Press. See p. 64.

8. K. B. BaOBERC 1956 Shock Waves in Elastic and Elastic-plastic Media. Stockholm: Report

No. Io9, Kungl. Forif. Befast. Forsk.

9. H. N. ABm~MSON,H. J. PLASSand E. A. RIPPERCEa 1958 Adv. appl. ~VIech. 5, t I I .

to. H. KOOKy x958 Appl. Mech. Rev. xx, 465.

xI. S. C. HUNTER 1959 Progress in Solid Mechanics (I. N. Sneddon and R. Hill, eds.). North

Holland Publishing Co. p. 3x2. W. A. GREEN X959 ibid. x, p. 225.

I3. J. W. O. Cm~cGs 196x ibid. ~, p. 143.

x4. M. J. P. MUSCaXvE x96x ibid. % p. 63.

x5. H. KOLSKYI960 Structural Mechanics (J. N. Goodier and N. J. Hoff, eds.). London : Pergamon

Press. See p. 233.

x6. J. MmLOWITZ X960,4ppl. Mech. Rev. 3, 865.

t7. H. KOLSKY I962 Experimental Techniques in Shock and Vibration (W. J. Worley, ed.). New

York : A.S.M.E. See p. i x.

x8. H. LAMa x89o Proc. Lond. math. Soc. 2x, 85 ; x917 Proc. roy. Soc. A93, xI4.

19. L. POeHHAMMERi876J, reine angew. Math. 8x, 324.

20. C. CmteE x889 Trans. Camb. phil. Soc. x4, 250 ; 1889 Quart. J. pure and appl. Math. 23, 335.

2x. J. GHOSH I923 Bull. Calcutta math. Soc. I3, 217; 1924 ibid. x4, 31.

22. E. GreBE and E. BLECHSCHMIDT1933 Ann. Phys., Leipzig 18, 417 .

23. G. HERMANNand I. MIRSKY 19569qt. appl. Mech. 23, 563 ; I958 ibid. 25, 9724. J. E. GmmNSPANI96oJ. aero. Space S d . 27, 3725. S. TIMOSHENKOI921 Phil. Mag. 41,744.

26. R. D. MINDLIN and G. HERMANN 1952 Proc. Ist U.S. nat. Congr. appl. Mech. New York:

A.S.M.E. See p. I87.

27. R. D. MINDLINand H. D. McNtVEN 196oj. appl. Mech. 27, 145.

28. A. E. H. Love 1928 A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elastidty. Cambridge University

Press, 4th edition. See p. 29o.

I I0

29.

3 o.

31 .

32.

33.

34.

3536.

37.

38.

39.

40.

4 I.

42.

43.

444546.

4748.

4950.

5I.

5z.

53.

54.

55.

56.

57.

58.

59.

60.

6i.

62.

63.

64.

65.

66.

67.

68.

69.

7 o.

71.

72.

73.

74.

7576.

77.

78.

79.

II. KOLSKY

R. 1\I. DAVIES x948 Phil. Trans. ,4, 24 o, 375S. PE'rEr~.~.qON I953 Trans. Roy. Inst. Tech. Stockholm, No. 62.

E. A. Rn'PERGER I953 Proc. Ist :VIidwestern Conf. on Solid !Vlech. U r b a n a , Ill. See p. 29.

I). Y. HSIF.H and H. KOl..SKY I958 Proc. phys. Soc. 7 x, 6o8.

J. ~IIKLOWITZ and ('. R. NmEWANGER I 9 5 7 J - appl. Mech. 24, 240

C. W. Ct:R'rls I 9 5 4 J . appl. Phys. 25, 9z8.

L. Y. T u , J. W. BRF.NNA.'q and J. A. SAUER 1 9 5 5 J . acoust. Soc. Hmer. 27, 5 5 o

E. G. STANFORI) 1950 Nuovo ('ira. Suppl. No. 2, 7, 332.

l). S. I h;c;nF_q, \V. 1,. PONDROM a n d R. I,. XiIMg i949 Phys. Rc~. 75, 1552

t l . KOLSKY I954 Phil. Mag. 45, 7 I2.

I). M. CUNNINGIL.'tM a n d W. (}OI.DSMITII I 9 5 6 J . appl. :~lech. a3, 612.

E. A. RIPPERGEI~ and 11. \V. ABRAMSON I 9 5 1 J . appl. :~tech. 24, 43 I

J. D. OWEN a n d R. M. DAWrS I949 Nature (Lond.) I64, 752.

J. M. KaAH:T I 9 5 5 J . appl. Phys. 26, I248.

I'. SAUTER 1950 Z. angew. Math. Mech. 3 o, 2o 3.

J. N. GOODn:.R a n d R. E. D. BISHOP I952 J . appl. Phys. 23, 124.

F. ('. ROESLER x955 Phil. Mag. 46, 517.

11. SCHARDIN I950 Glastech. Ber. 23, 1, 67, 325.

D. G. CHRISTIE I955 Phil. Mag. 46, 527.

'I'. I). NOR'I'HWOOD a n d I). V. ANDEP~SON 1954 Bull. seismol. Soc. Amer. geophys. Un. 35, 969.

L. KNor'oFV 1954 Trans. /tmcr. geophys. Un. 3 5 , 9 6 9 .

J. OLIVER, F. PRESS a n d M. |'wINe; r954 Geophysics I9, 2o2.

J. \V. C. SHERWOOD t958 t'roc, phys. Soc. 7 x, 207.

R. l". I). BISHOP 1953 Quart. J. Mech. 6, 25o.

E. A. I~dPPERGI'R a n d H. N. ABP~.xlsox I957 Proc. 3rd Midwestern Conf. on Solid Alechs. U n i v .

of M i c h i g a n . See p. 135.

r). R. BLANI) 1960 The Theory of Linear Viscoelasticity. L o n d o n : P e r g a m o n .

l,. BOLTZMANN 1876 Pogg. Ann Eng. 7, 624.

I I. KOLSK'C I959 Progress in Non-destructive Testing 2, 29. L o n d o n : H e y w o o d .

ii. KOLSKY ~956 Phil. ;l~lag. I, 693.

K. W. IIILLIER 1949 Proc. phys. Soc. 62B, I 11.

| I. KOLSKV and S. S. LEE 196Z Brown University Tech. Rep. No. 5, Contract. N o n r 562 (30).

L. I1. DONNELL I93 o Trans. II.S.M.E. 52, ~53.

T . VON KARMAN a n d P. F. I.)t:WEZ 1 9 5 o J . appl. Phys. 2x, 987.

P. E. I)I:WEZ a n d I). S. Ct.ARK 1947 Proc. Amer. Soc. Test. Mater. 47, 5o2.

J. F. BELL 1956Johns Ilopkins Univ. tech. Rep. No. 4, A r m y C o n t r . No. D A - 3 6 - o 3 4 - O R D . , 1363.

t'. J. STEI~XGLASSand 1). A. S'rUAItT 1953 J . appl. ~,Vlech. 2o, 427.

B. E. K. ALTER and C. \V. CURTIS x 9 5 6 J , appl. Phys. 27, Io79.

L. t"..XhLVERN 1 9 5 I J . appl. ,~Iech. 18, 2o3.

II. G . HOPKINS 196I Appl. Alech. Rcv. x4, 417

l[. KOLSKV I949 Proc. phys. Soc. 6zB, 676.

E. D. U. DAVn"~ a n d S. C. HUNTER I 9 6 3 J . Mech. Phys. Solids IX, I55.

1I. KOLSKY and I,. S. I)Ot:CH I 9 6 2 J . . ~ l e c h . Phys. Solids to, ~95.

M. P. WHITE and I,. GRn:vIS ~947J. appl. 2~/lech. x 5 , 2 5 6 .

1". H. LEt.: and S. J. Tuppi.:R I 9 5 4 J . appl. Mech. 2z, 63.

K. \V. thLLn.:R a n d H. KOLSKY 1949 Proc. phys. Soc. 62B, t11.

P- \V. I]RIDC;.XlAN ~93 ! The Physics of High Pressures. L o n d o n : Bell.

I). C. PACK, \\r. ~I. EVANS a n d I | . J. JAMES 1948 Proc. phys. Soc. 6o, ~.

(;. 1". I)UVALL ~962 Appl. 3lech. Rev. I5, 849.

II. KOLSKV ~959 Fracture ( A v c r b a c h et al., eds.). T e c h n o l o g y Press a n d Wiley. See p. z8~.

S. R. BODNEa and | t. KOLSKY 1958 Proc. 3rd U.S..Nat. Congr. appl. Mech. N e w York : A . S . M . E .

See p. 495.