Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CANADA
AND
NORAD
240 km radius, and left lingering deadly radiation drifting across the country for decades. The
interceptor missiles fired from American bases and aircraft would have had a similar effect,
and their range was not much greater than the densely populated Canadian cities that rest
along the border.
PM Diefenbaker agreed to join NORAD without a full understanding of what the alliance
meant for Canada. When he slowly began to recognise the dangers of American nuclear
policy, he stalled acceptance of the nuclear-tipped Bomarcs, dragging his feet and angering
the Americans. By 1963 it was largely a moot point, since there was literally no defence
against the new Soviet ICBMs (Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles). Canada, however,
remained a member of NORAD, which was geared towards the destruction of much of
Canada in the name of saving the Unites States. Indeed, later that year the US Secretary of
Defence, Robert McNamara, admitted publically that while the Bomarcs were of little value
against ICBMs, they at least forced the USSR to waste missiles (which would otherwise be
used against American targets) by targeting the Bomarc launch sites in Quebec and Ontario.
Canada was, in effect, nuclear missile bait.
The nuclear issue divided the ruling Conservative party, and in the 1963 election the
Liberals, running on a pro-US, pro-nuclear weapons platform, defeated Deifenbaker and the
Conservatives, who had pledged to reject nuclear weapons.
1. Should Canada have joined NORAD? Why or why not?
2. Do you think most Canadians would have supported NORAD if they knew the details
of US nuclear policy? Would they have a real choice? Why or why not?
3. Considering the way the US viewed Canada during the Cold War, do you think
Canada should trust the US as an ally?
4. Do you think striking first in a nuclear war could ever be the right thing to do?