Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
4.1 RESULTS
Based on Figure 4.1, the small circle at the left end is I O2 and the bigger circle at the
right end is IO1. The hidden line in the middle of the pendulum which is 34.8mm from
IO1 is the IG.
Sample of calculation:
V 2= ( 0.0125 )2 0.01
6
4.91 10 m
3. Component 3:
Combining the two small half cylinders at each end of the hollow rectangular at
the centre of the wooden pendulum will give a full cylinder of diameter 1mm.
V 3 a= ( 0.005 ) 0.01
7.854 107 m3
4. Component 4:
V 3=V 3 a +V 3 b
4.48 105 m3
5. Total volume of wooden pendulum:
V pendulum=V 1V 2V 3V 4
6.4 1044.91 1064.48 105
5.9 104 m3
6. Total density of wooden pendulum:
pendulum=
mtotal
v pendulum
0.6 kg
4 3
5.9 10 m
1016.13
kg
3
m
m2= v 2
1016.13(4.91 106 )
3
4.99 10 kg
c)
m3= v 3
1016.13(4.48 105 )
0.0455 kg
Area, A (m2)
0.8 x 0.08 = 0.064
( 0.0125 )
4.91 10
0.038
A = 0.069
y A = 0.028 =0.406 m
A 0.069
Component 1:
I1 = 1/12 m l + m d
= 1/12 (0.65)(0.8)2 + (0.65)(0.406 0.4)2
= 0.0347 kgm3
0.0256
5
1.8658 10
O1
y A (m3)
0.4
4
(m)
2.352 10
0.525
y
A = 0.028
Component
Area, A (m2)
1
2
( 0.0125 )
0.4
4.91 10
4.48 103
A = 0.069
O2
y A = 0.0272 =0.394 m
A 0.069
0.0256
3.74142 x10-4
0.762
y A (m3)
(m)
0.275
1.232 x 10-3
A = 0.0272
a. IO1
Tavg = 14.445 1.3898 s
Therefore:
T1 oscilations = 14.445/ 10 =1.4445 sec
T1 oscilations = 2
LR1
g
L01 = g
T1 oscilations
2
= 9.81
1. 4445
2
L01 = 0.5185 m
IG1 = m rG ( L01 - rG )
= 0.6(0.355) (0.5185 - 0.355)
= 0.0348 kg m
I01 = IG01 + m rG
= 0.0348 + 0.6 (0.355)
= 0.110 kg m3
b. IO2
Tavg = 14.53 s
Therefore:
T2 oscilations = 14.53 / 10 =1.453 sec
T2 oscilations = 2
LR1
g
L02 = g
T2 oscilations
2
= 9.81
1.453
2
L02 = 0.5246 m
IG2 = m rG ( L02 - rG )
= 0.6(0.355) (0.5246 - 0.355)
= 0.0361kg m
IO2 = IG2 + m rG
= 0.0361 + 0.6 (0.355)
= 0.1117 kg m
2. Error Percentage:
IO1 = 0.1315-0.110 X100% = 16.35%
0.1315
IG1 = 0.0348 0.0326 X100% = 6.32%
0.0348
IO2 = 0.126-0.1117 X100% = 11.35%
0.126
IG2 = 0.0361- 0.0326 X100% = 9.7%
0.0361
Poin
t
Moment of
Inertia
Theoretical
Value (kg m)
Experimental Value(kg m)
Percentage Error
(%)
IO1
0.1315
0.110
16.35
IG1
0.0326
0.0348
6.32
IO2
0.126
0.1117
11.35
IG2
0.0326
0.0361
9.7
O1
O2
5.1 DISCUSSION
Based on the experiment conducted, all the values of mass moment of inertia
at the centre of gravity, I G and at the suspension point, I O on different end, O 1 and O2
have been determined according to the experiment and theory. The values of IO1,
IG1, IO2 and IG2 are theoretically calculated using formulae and finding the volume
of each component exist in the non-homogeneous wooden pendulum. The values of
IO1, IG1, IO2 and IG2 are experimentally determined by taking time for 10 complete
oscillation of the wooden pendulum on different angle for each suspension point.
Comparing all the values of IO1, IG1, IO2 and IG2 in theoretical and experimental
calculation, it is found out that each value is slightly different from each other. The
percentage error between the theoretical and experimental values can be observed
in Table 4.1. The percentage errors are merely less than 20% and therefore can be
considered as acceptable. The difference in values may be caused by several errors
during the experiment and calculation. The dimension of the wooden pendulum may
be taken under parallax and precision errors as only a ruler is used to take the
dimensions of the wooden pendulum including the circular parts. Therefore, this
might affect the reading taken. During the oscillation, a stopwatch is used and
therefore, there might be zero error as the starting of the swing is not precisely
parallel with the starting of the time taken. This may cause the time to be slower or
faster than it is supposed to be recorded. The oscillation of the wooden pendulum
especially on the smaller circle, O2 is wobbling as the supporting part is so small and
this cause disturbance during the oscillation. In the calculation procedure, only
several decimal points are considered and this also affected all the values
calculated. All of this disturbance and errors has affected the values of IO1, IG1, IO2
and IG2 obtained.
6.1 CONCLUSION