Project: 4/6 Laning of NH-5 fron Tuni to Anakapalli

Document: D:\99088\RH\Vol. II (Part-B)\Hydrology\Appendices

Hydrology

Sheet: 1 of 4
Date: October 2000
Revision: R0

Appendix 1.1 (ii)

Calculation
Detail of the Bridge
PWD No./ Name of the Bridge :
Old Chainage :
New Chainage:

322/3
321.610
321.645

km
km

(on existing NH-5)

(on new alignment)

Preparation of Catchment Area Plan

A catchment plan showing the river/stream , contours and spot levels was prepared for
determining the physiographic parameters as follow:

Determination of Physiographic Parameters

i)
ii)
iii)

Area (A)
=
Length of the longest stream (L)
=
Length of the longest stream from a point opposite
C.G. Of catchment to point of study (Lc)
=
Heigth of the farthest point above the point of interest
along the river (H)
=
50 yr, 24 hr rainfall, R50(24)
=
Ratio of 1hr rainfall to 24 hr rainfall
=
So, 50 yr, 1 hr rainfall, R50(1)
=

iv)
v)

vi)

3.010 km
382.132 m
26.00 cm
0.350
9.1 cm

(Ref: Figure 3.15(a)

of reference 1)

Equivalent stream slope (Se)

Sl.
No.

R.D. Starting
From Bridge
Site
(km)

R.L. Of
River Bed

0.000
3.010
6.100
6.320
6.486
6.650

10.868
20.000
100.000
200.000
300.000
393.000

1
2
3
4
5
6

(m)

Length of
Height
Each
Above
Segment (Li) Datum (Di)
(km)
(m)
0.000
3.010
3.090
0.220
0.166
0.164

Total

Se

9.132
89.132
189.132
289.132
382.132

Di-1+Di

Li.(Di-1+Di)

(m)

(km.m)

9.132
98.264
278.264
478.264
671.264

27.486
303.654
61.218
79.392
110.087

6.65

Note:

11.964 sq km
6.650 km

581.837

Datum is the reduced level at the point of study.

Sum [Li (Di-1+Di)]

= -----------------------L^2

13.1570

,Say

13.157 m/km

Flood Estimation by Improved Rational Method

Step-1

Determination of Time of Concentration (tc)

Time of concentration, tc, is obtained by Bransby William Formula
i.e. tc= (0.9 L)/[{A}^0.1 {S1}^0.2]
= 2.25
hr

(Ref: Eq. 5.2.2 of reference 1)

where
L=
A=
S1=

4.130
4.616
5.746

miles
sq miles
%

Note: Here L is in mile, A is in sq mile, and S1 is in per cent

Step-2

Determination of Runoff Coefficeint (C)

For coastal areas, Runoff Coefficeint, C, is given by
C
= 0.332 (R.F)^0.2

(Ref: Article 2.1.1 of reference 1)

where
R = 50 yr, 24 hr rainfall, R50(24)
F = Areal Reduction Factor

=
=

26.00
0.86

cm
(Ref: Article 2.1.1 of reference 1)

Therefore
C

0.618

Draft Detailed Project Report

D:\99088\DPR Report\DPR_ii_i\Hydrology\274024799.xls

Roads & Highways

Project: 4/6 Laning of NH-5 fron Tuni to Anakapalli

Document: D:\99088\RH\Vol. II (Part-B)\Hydrology\Appendices
Hydrology

Sheet: 2 of 4
Date: October 2000
Revision: R0

Appendix 1.1 (ii)

Calculation
Note: Here R is in cm.
Step-3

Estimation of Rainfall Intensity (I) Lasting for tc hr Duration

Ratio for tc hr
Ratio for 1 hr

=
=

So,

Step-4

(Ref: Figure-4 of reference 1)

K = ratio for tc hr / ratio for 1 hr

=
1.286

Therefore, R50(tc)
I

0.540
0.420

(R50(tc)/tc)

K . R50(1)

11.700 cm

5.203 cm/hr

Estimation of Design Flood Discharge

Design flood discharge
Q50

= 2.78.C.I.A
= 106.958

cumec

= 107.000

cumec

Or,
Q50

Note: Here I is in cm/hr and A is in sq km

Flood Estimation by Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Based Method

Step-1

Calculation of tp (Time from the center of unit rain fall duration to the peak of U.H.
tp

0.376*[{L*Lc}/{sqrt(Se)}]^0.434
= 0.789

(Ref: Table-1 of reference 1)

hr

Note: Here L and Lc are in km

Step-2

Calculation of Peak Discharge of Unit Hydrograph (Qp)

Qp

Step-3

1.215 * A
------------(tp)^0.691

17.122

cumec

Determination of Time of Concentration (tc)

Time of concentration ,
tc
=
td
=
1.1 x tp 0.868

Step-3

hr

(Ref: Article - 7 of reference 1)

Estimation of Rainfall Intensity (I) Lasting for tc hr Duration

Ratio for tc hr
Ratio for 1 hr

=
=
So,

Therefore, R50(tc)

Step-4

(Ref: Table-1 of reference 1)

0.380
0.420

(Ref: Figure-4 of reference 1)

K = ratio for tc hr / ratio for 1 hr

=
0.905
K . R50(1)

8.233 cm

Calculation of Design Flood Discharge

Q50

Qp * R50(tc)

140.968 cumec

(Ref: Table-1 of reference 1)

Or,
Q50=

141.000 cumec

Note: Here R50(tc) is in cm

Reference 1 "Flood Estimation Methods For Catchments Less Than 25 sq km in Area", Bridges And Floods
Wing Report No. RBF-16, March - 1990

Draft Detailed Project Report

D:\99088\DPR Report\DPR_ii_i\Hydrology\274024799.xls

Roads & Highways

Project: 4/6 Laning of NH-5 fron Tuni to Anakapalli

Document: D:\99088\RH\Vol. II (Part-B)\Hydrology\Appendices
Pavement Design

Sheet: 3 of 4
Date: October 2000
Revision: R0

Appendix 1.1 (ii)

Calculation
C

Flood Estimation by Slope Area Method (Manning's Equation)

Observed HFL = 12.234 m
(Cross-Section At Bridge Site)

Chainage
(m)
1
0.000
0.100
3.000
6.000
9.125
12.250
15.375
18.500
21.500
24.400
24.500

H.F.L
(G.T.S)
2

12.234

Actual
Modified
Bed Level Bed Level
(m)
(m)
3
4
13.484
10.384
10.134
10.334
10.684
10.434
10.384
10.184
10.034
10.334
13.484

13.484
10.384
10.134
10.334
10.684
10.434
10.384
10.184
10.034
10.334
13.484

Height
h
5

Average
Height
h'
6

Horizontal
Distance
x
7

Area
6x7

0.000
1.850
2.100
1.900
1.550
1.800
1.850
2.050
2.200
1.900
0.000

0.925
1.975
2.000
1.725
1.675
1.825
1.950
2.125
2.050
0.950

0.100
2.900
3.000
3.125
3.125
3.125
3.125
3.000
2.900
0.100

0.093
5.728
6.000
5.391
5.234
5.703
6.094
6.375
5.945
0.095

Total

Area of Cross-Section, A
Wetted Perimeter, P
Hydraulic Mean Depth, R = A/P=
Longitudinal Slope, S
Velocity of Stream, V
Discharge, Q = A x V

=
=
=
=
=
=
Say,

Difference
Wetted
in h
Perimeter
h"
sqrt(7*7+9*9)
9
10

1.850
0.250
0.200
0.350
0.250
0.050
0.200
0.150
0.300
1.900

1.853
2.911
3.007
3.145
3.135
3.125
3.131
3.004
2.915
1.903

46.657

28.128

46.657 Sq m
28.128
m
1.659
m
0.0025
2.336 m/sec (Manning's coeff., n =
108.981 m3/sec
109.000 cumec

0.030 )

Cross Section At Bridge Site

14.000

R L (m)

13.000
12.000
11.000
10.000
0.000

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

25.000

30.000

R D (m)
Original X-Section

Rechannelised X-Section

Draft Detailed Project Report

D:\99088\DPR Report\DPR_ii_i\Hydrology\274024799.xls

Observed HFL = 12.234 m

Roads & Highways

Project: 4/6 Laning of NH-5 fron Tuni to Anakapalli

Document: D:\99088\RH\Vol. II (Part-B)\Hydrology\Appendices
Pavement Design

Sheet: 4 of 4
Date: October 2000
Revision: R0

Appendix 1.1(ii)
Calculation
Recommendation

A)

Calculation of Design Flood Discharge, Qd

i)
Flood Discharge by Rational Method
=
ii)
Flood Discharge by SUH Method
=
ii)
Flood Discharge by Manning's Eq. (By Observed HFL =
Therefore,
Design flood discharge, Qd
=
So, Recommended Design Discharge, Qd

B)

107.00 cumec
141.00 cumec
109.00 cumec
141.000 cumec

141.000 cumec

Calculation of HFL Corresponding to Design Flood Discharge, Qd

(Cross-Section At Bridge Site)

Chainage
(m)
1
0.000
0.100
3.000
6.000
9.125
12.250
15.375
18.500
21.500
24.400
24.500

H.F.L
(G.T.S)
2

12.580

Actual
Modified
Bed Level Bed Level
(m)
(m)
3
4
13.484
10.384
10.134
10.334
10.684
10.434
10.384
10.184
10.034
10.334
13.484

13.484
10.384
10.134
10.334
10.684
10.434
10.384
10.184
10.034
10.334
13.484

Height
h
5

Average
Height
h'
6

Horizontal
Distance
x
7

Area
6x7

0.000
2.196
2.446
2.246
1.896
2.146
2.196
2.396
2.546
2.246
0.000

1.098
2.321
2.346
2.071
2.021
2.171
2.296
2.471
2.396
1.123

0.100
2.900
3.000
3.125
3.125
3.125
3.125
3.000
2.900
0.100

0.110
6.731
7.038
6.472
6.316
6.784
7.175
7.413
6.948
0.112

Total
Area of Cross-Section, A
Wetted Perimeter, P
Hydraulic Mean Depth, R = A/P=
Longitudinal Slope, S
Velocity of Stream, V
Discharge, Q = A x V
Recommended HFL =

=
=
=
=
=
=
Say,

Difference
Wetted
in h
Perimeter
h"
sqrt(7*7+9*9)
9
10

2.196
0.250
0.200
0.350
0.250
0.050
0.200
0.150
0.300
2.246

55.099

55.099 Sq m
28.819
m
1.912
m
0.0025
2.568 m/sec (Manning's coeff., n =
141.491 m3/sec
141.000 cumec

2.198
2.911
3.007
3.145
3.135
3.125
3.131
3.004
2.915
2.248
28.819

0.030 )

12.580

Cross Section At Bridge Site

14.000

R L (m)

13.000
12.000
11.000
10.000
0.000

5.000

10.000
15.000
R D (m)

20.000

25.000

30.000

Original X-Section

Draft Detailed Project Report

D:\99088\DPR Report\DPR_ii_i\Hydrology\274024799.xls

Roads & Highways