Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SHARE
Source: source unknown
Beautiful people have higher intelligencethan ugly people, especially if they are men.
In a previous post, I show, using an American sample from the National Longitudinal
Study of Adolescent Health, that physically more attractive people are more
intelligent. As I explain in a subsequent post, the association between physical
attractiveness and intelligence may be due to one of two reasons. Genetic quality may
be a common cause for both (such that genetically healthier people are simultaneously
more beautiful and more intelligent). Alternatively, the association may result from a
cross-trait assortative mating, where more intelligent and higher status men of greater
resources marry more beautiful women. Because both intelligence and physical
attractiveness are highly heritable, their children will be simultaneously more
beautiful and more intelligent. Regardless of the reason for the association, the new
evidence suggests that the association between physical attractiveness and general
intelligence may be much stronger than we previously thought.
The National Child Development Study (NCDS) includes all babies born during the
week of 03-09 March 1958 in Great Britain (England, Wales, and Scotland), and has
followed them for more than half a century throughout their lives. When the
children were 7 and again when they were 11, their teachers were asked to describe
them physically. For the purpose of the analysis below, the children are defined to
be attractive if they were described as attractive at both age 7 and age 11. They were
defined to be unattractive otherwise. 62% of the NCDS respondents are coded as
attractive. Their intelligence is measured with 11 different cognitive tests at three
different ages (7, 11, and 16). NCDS has the best measure of general intelligence
available in any large-scale survey data.
As the graph below shows, attractive NCDS respondents are significantly more
intelligent than unattractive NCDS respondents. Attractive NCDS respondents have the
mean IQ of 104.23, whereas unattractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of
91.81. The difference between them is 12.42. This mean difference implies a
correlation coefficient ofr = .381, which is reasonably large in any survey data.
Source: NCDS
Source: NCDS
Source: NCDS
In contrast, the attractive men in the NCDS sample have a mean IQ of 105.00, and the
unattractive men have a mean IQ of 91.39. The difference between them is 13.61,
which is almost one full standard deviation in the IQ distribution ( = 15). This mean
difference implies a correlation coefficient of r = .414, which is very large in any survey
data.
Now, given that it was the childrens teacher who was asked to assess their physical
attractiveness, there is a possibility of a halo effect, where teachers believe that better,
more intelligent students are physically more attractive. The halo-effect explanation for
the association between physical attractiveness and intelligence, however, runs into
three different problems. First, it presumes that the judgment of physical attractiveness
is arbitrary and subjective. As I explain in an earlier post, however, beauty is not in the
eye of the beholder; it is an objective, quantifiable trait of someone like height or
weight. Second, as I note in the previous post, the association between beauty and
intelligence has been found in the American Add Health sample, where physical
attractiveness of the respondents is assessed by the interviewer who is unaware of their
intelligence.