Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of group training of stress management with cognitive-behavioral therapy
(CBT) in reducing depression, anxiety and stress perceived among HIV-positive men.
Methods:Inthis semi-experimental study, three groups of HIV-positive men (CBT group, stress management group,
and control group) including 15 patients in each group were compared regarding depression, anxiety, and stress using
pre-test and post-test tools.
Results: Both interventions (CBT and stress management) were effective in reducing depression, anxiety and
perceived stress. Evaluating adjustedmean showed the more effectivenessofthe group stressmanagementtraining than
CBT.
Conclusion: Group stress management training is more effective than group CBT in HIV-positive
mentodecreasedepression, anxiety and stress management.
Declaration of interest: None.
Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://.irct.ir. Unique identifier: 2012121711782N1
Citation: HemmatiSabet A, Khalatbari J, Abbas Ghorbani M, Haghighi M, Ahmadpanah M. Group training of
stress management vs. group cognitive-behavioral therapy in reducing depression, anxiety and perceived stress among
HIV-positive men. Iran J Psychiatry Behave Sci 2013; 7(1): 4-8.
Introduction
he basic feature of HIV infection is
the gradual demolition of physical
ability as well as neurologicalemotional phenomena (1). HIVpositive people have to fight with fear
associated with diseases such as disability,
increasing independence, reducing control of
the body and pain. Nature of stressful agents
is one of the most fundamental aspects of the
people with HIV infection and AIDS.
Although not unexpected, a range of
psychological disturbances from a relatively
light state, such as sick like apathy, feeling
guilty, helplessness and frustration to extreme
www.ijpbs.mazums.ac.ir
www.ijpbs.mazums.ac.ir
Table 1. Average and standard deviation of pre-test and post-test scores in experimental and control groups
Group
Cognitive-behavioral Training
Control group
Mean
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
SD
Pre-test depression
29.07
6.181
27.20
6.038
27.47
Post-test depression
23.73
4.949
21.47
4.926
28
Pre-test anxiety
24
6.761
21.87
6.523
22.13
Post-test anxiety
17.33
5.589
15.73
5.650
22.53
31.47
4.438
29.47
4.438
31.47
24.40
4.014
22.27
4.061
32.53
group
Diffraction
source
Sum
square SS
degrees of
freedom f
Mean
squarems
Effect
size Eta
Test
power
Depression
Anxiety
345.218
425.861
2
2
177.109
212.931
19.532
20.267
0.001
0.001
0.500
0.510
1.000
1.000
Stress
684.995
342.498
55.013
0.001
0.739
1.000
www.ijpbs.mazums.ac.ir
Table 3. Analysis of covariance between therapies of depression, anxiety, and perceived stress based on cognitivebehavioral and stress management training
group
Diffraction
source
Sum square
Degrees of freedom
Mean
square
Depression
Anxiety
232.469
324.144
1
1
232.469
324.144
25.638
30.852
0.001
0.001
Mean
differenc
e
5.650
6.672
Perceived stress
474.666
474.666
76.242
0.001
8.073
www.ijpbs.mazums.ac.ir
www.ijpbs.mazums.ac.ir