Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
IPMA Certification
Yearbook 2001
Short Version
without lists of certificated individuals
Please look up actual lists of certificated individuals
at IPMA website www.ipma.ch
Table of Content
1
Preface ............................................................................................................................... 5
Overview ................................................................................................................ 7
Certification System................................................................................................. 7
General Structure and Principles ............................................................................... 9
Organisation and Administration..............................................................................10
Worldwide Cooperation...........................................................................................11
National Competence Baselines ...............................................................................11
Standards ...............................................................................................................13
Number of Certificates................................................................................................... 16
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
Certification Bodies........................................................................................................ 26
IPMA Validation............................................................................................................. 29
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
Preface
After several years of development our National Associations started in 1998 officially and world-wide
with the universal IPMA Four Level Certification (4-L-C) system.
The national associations usually start with the nomination of their first assessors, with the establishment of their certification body engaging important sectors of the economy, and the transfer of the
IPMA Competence Baseline (ICB) to the National Competence Baseline (NCB). Their own assessors
are trained during the first certification cycle with the assistance of an experienced assessor from an
existing certification body.
In April 2001 Jacques Communier started as chairman of the Certification Validation Management
Board succeeding Hans Knoepfel. The work was reallocated. Olaf Pannenbcker took the torch as
lead editor for the IPMA Certification Yearbook from Hans Knoepfel who led the editions 1998-2000.
In the year 2001:
The IPMA Level descriptions and the pyramid figure were streamlined and slightly modified and
the certification section in the IPMA Brochure was adapted in the issue May 2001.
New certification programmes started in the Czech and Slovak Republics, China, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Sweden, Poland and Croatia. A successful restart with a new certification body was
done in the Netherlands.
The IPMA validation process was started in Egypt and Switzerland. The certification programme in
the Czech Republic was accredited.
The Certification Yearbook 2000 and a reduced version of the IPMA Competence Baseline (ICB)
became available on the IPMA web site. A new print of the ICB (version 2.0b) was made.
The ICB as a global standard, the National Competence Baselines and the certification programmes
of the national certification bodies are major flywheels for the project management promotion worldwide.
Other empowering components are the bilateral co-operations between existing certification bodies
and certification bodies that start a new programme. The most remarkable set-up took place in China
by our national member Project Management Research Committee and Erhard Motzel.
More and more project managers prefer IPMA's four level system which fits to the personal development and career of individuals and furthermore to the competitiveness of the companies and the competence of their personnel.
Hans Knoepfel
Jacques Communier
Member
Member
Chairman
Note
The information in this yearbook may contain errors or non-actual information due to an imperfect
retrieval, transfer or interpretation of data from the national certification bodies.
IPMA endeavours to present correct data. However, IPMA does not accept any liability for the completeness and correctness of the information.
To be sure it is necessary to contact the national certification body for getting the latest information.
Country
agree- valida-
ment1)
Austria (PMA-Zertifizierungsstelle)
tion2)
V
Level3)
A
RV
6)
P
RA
5)
RV
RV
RA
RA
VP
VP
VP
VP
RIV
RIV
R
RIV
R
4)
Greece (HPMI)
Latvia (LNPVA)
Norway (NFP)
South Africa
RA
RA
VP
VP
RIV
VP
VP
Total IPMA
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
27 (+3)
2 (+8)
RA
5)
4 (+4)
15 (+10) 17 (+9)
P
16 (+10)
Overview
The International Project Management Association (IPMA) is a non-profit organisation, whose function
is to be the prime promoter of project management internationally.
IPMA started in 1965, under its former name of INTERNET, as a forum for the exchange of experience amongst project managers of international projects. It hosted its first international conference in
1967 in Vienna, and since that time has developed steadily, as indeed has the discipline of project
management itself.
The membership of IPMA is primarily of national project management associations. These about
30 national member associations serve the specific needs of project management professionals in
their own country in their own language. IPMA develops those needs at the international and global
levels.
To achieve this aim IPMA has developed a number of products and services encompassing research and development, education and training, standards and certification as well as conferences,
seminars and workshops supported by a range of publications. In addition to its member associations,
there are a number of other cooperating organisations and individual members who work with IPMA to
promote project management internationally.
An individual or company automatically supports IPMA if they become a member of a national project
management association which is a member of IPMA. Where this is not possible or desirable, or if
there is no member Association in a country, then direct international membership is available to
them.
The benefits of membership include:
Quarterly Newsletter
3.2
Certification System
On June 14, 1998 in Ljubljana, Slovenia, the IPMA Council confirmed the establishment of IPMA's
universal four level system which was approved on February 28, 1998 in Bled. The certification programmes in project management were then going to be realised by the National Associations.
The certification programmes of the certification bodies shall be an incentive for the project managers and the members of the project management teams (i.e. the project management personnel) to
For these purposes, a variety of qualifications and competences concerning the knowledge, the
experience, the personal attitude and the general impression of the project management personnel
are assessed. IPMA developed the following four-level concept for the certification programmes shown
in the figure below. The programme of a certification body that abides by the rules of IPMA will be
validated and revalidated on a regular basis by IPMA.
The main requirements for each level are derived from typical activities, responsibilities and requirements from practice. The IPMA four level certification system is now shown as follows:
Title
Capabilities
Certificated
Projects
Director
(IPMA Level A)
Certificated
Project
Manager
(IPMA Level B)
Competence
= know ledge
+ experience
+ personal
attitude
Certificated
Project
Management
Professional
(IPMA Level C)
Certificated
Project
Management
Practitioner
(IPMA Level D)
Certification Process
Stage 1
Stage 2
Optional
Application,
curriculum
vitae, self
assessment
references
project list
Know ledge
Application,
curriculum
vitae, self
assessment
Stage 3
Project
report
e.g.
workshop,
seminar
e.g.
workshop,
report
Validity
3-5
years
Interview
Exam
Exam
time
limited
not time
limited
option:
time-limited
The levels are not restrained to hierarchical thinking. A project management specialist on the level D
may be, apart from his fundamental knowledge in project management, a highly qualified, experienced
and recognised expert in a special field. For example, he or she may own an additional credential in
cost management. On each level most professional work can be done for the respective range of
tasks and decisions, in a local or regional or national or in an international context.
The levels are suitable for career track and maturity models as well as for personnel development and
benchmarking programmes of companies and other organisations.
The level D represents the requirements of the professional associations for project management
knowledge provided by the education and training in project management for its use in practice.
The national associations are responsible for developing and managing their own project management qualification and competence programme and for establishing their certification bodies.
IPMA owns and maintains its universal system for validating the national programmes to coordinate
and harmonise the certifications regarding the IPMA general structure and principles.
3.3
The general structure for all levels is shown in the IPMA Competence Baseline (ICB) which includes
the description of the fields of project management qualification and competence and the taxonomy
for the assessment of the project management personnel. The criteria are from the competence
ranges of the basics of project management, the organisational and social competence, the methods
and procedures, the general management, the personal attitudes, and the general impression of the
project management personnel.
The principles for an IPMA validated project management qualification and competence programme
are the content of the Agreement between IPMA and a national association and the IPMA Certification
Regulations and Guidelines (ICRG).
The following stages are the compulsory elements of the qualification and certification processes:
Levels A and B
project report
interview.
Level C
interview.
Level D
application
The organisation, the procedures and the forms shall be described in the quality handbook of the certification body including annexes. They should fulfill the requirements of the standard EN 45'013. It is
recommended that each certification body is accredited by the national governmental institute which
ideally should be a member of the European Accreditation (EA).
3.4
The Council of IPMA set up the certification validation organisation shown in the figure below.
IPMA Council
IPMA
Executive Board
IPMA Certification
Validation Management
Board
Validators
Network of National Associations
Network of National Certification Bodies
with IPMA Certification Validation Panel
the national certification bodies which are designated by the national associations and are
responsible for the qualification and certification programme
the IPMA certification validation panel, consisting of the representatives of the national certification bodies and their assessors, for exchanging experience and making recommendations for
improving IPMA's certification and validation system
the validators who visit the national certification bodies, audit their qualification and competence
programme and recommend improvements
the IPMA certification validation management board (CVM Board) which is operating and improving IPMA's universal system for validating project management qualification and competence
programmes
the IPMA Executive Board and the IPMA Council of Delegates who make the general decisions
concerning the qualification and competence programme and appoint the management board.
IPMA maintains a register of all acknowledged certificates of individuals and organisations awarded by
the bodies for certification of all national associations.
The certification bodies administer their confidential documentation of the candidates and the personnel of the certification body including the assessors. They process and provide the information
about their qualification and competence programme and their certification.
Version 1.00 / 01.10..2002
3.5
Worldwide Cooperation
27 National Associations have now signed the agreement with IPMA about the qualification and certification programmes. The certification of project management personnel on one or several IPMAlevels is in operation in 20 countries. Several more countries are on the way to their certification programme according to the 4-L-C system of IPMA and other countries are extending their certification
programme to more IPMA levels.
In the universal system of IPMA the certification is on four conceptual levels. The competence is definitely more than project management knowledge only. The assessment is made by experienced and
independent experts (assessors) who know well the relevant project management practice. In addition
to evidence in writing, the candidates present themselves in person to the assessors.
The qualification and competence programmes are a major point of discussion for project management associations around the globe for several years. The three main partners in the world-wide
cooperation for the qualification and certification of project management personnel are
The Steering Committee has organised one or two Global Forum meetings per year. In February 1999
the Global Working Groups (on Standards, Education, Certification / Accreditation, Research, and
Global Forum) were convened for the first time in East Horsley near London. Their discussions continued at the Global Forums and in meetings of the International Standards Committee.
3.6
United Kingdom
Body of Knowledge, Association for Project Management (APM), version 2000, U.K.,
published first in 1992
Switzerland
France
Matrice d'valuation en management du projet, AFITEP, version Octobre 2000, Paris, Manuel
Qualit 22 fvrier 2000- Version 2, published first in 1996
Germany
Austria
China
Czech Republic
Projektov rizeni, Project Management, Spolecnost pro projektove rzeni, ED 03.0, 2000.
Denmark
Egypt
Finland
Hungary
Iceland
Hugtakalykill - National Competence Baseline, first edition published on the web in December
2001
India
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Russia
Spain
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Sweden
Ukraine
Yugoslovia
3.7
Standards
IPMA Competence Baseline (ICB), Version 2.0b, Bremen, 1999, International Project Management Association
Editorial Committee
Gilles Caupin, Hans Knoepfel, Peter Morris, Erhard Motzel, Olaf Pannenbcker
Summary
To be professional, the discipline of Project Management has to have rigorous standards and guidelines to define the work of the project management personnel. These requirements are defined by
collecting, processing and institutionalising the accepted and applied competence in project management. In the IPMA Competence Baseline (ICB), the knowledge, experience and personal attitudes
expected from the project managers and their staff (project management personnel) are presented by
a description and a taxonomy.
The ICB contains basic terms, tasks, practices, skills, functions, management processes, methods,
techniques and tools that are commonly used in project management, as well as specialist knowledge, where appropriate, of innovative and advanced practices used in more limited situations. The
ICB is not a textbook and not a cookbook. It offers an access to the knowledge, experience and personal attitudes in project management. It is the basis for all certification programmes of the national
associations and their certification bodies that are validated by the International Association of Project
Management (IPMA).
In 1985 the Project Management Institute (PMI) in North America elaborated a Body of Knowledge
(BOK) for Project Management. This document and later versions until the actual Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge have been the basis for the knowledge test for the Project Management Professional (PMP).
IPMA (at that time called INTERNET) made an inquiry with their members about the need for certification in 1987. The majority of the answers were positive. The leading professional project management
associations were then establishing their baselines for the assessment of project management
competence during the last ten years. The Association of Project Managers (APM) in the United
Kingdom published the first version of its BOK in 1991. In other European countries, similar projects
and development work were done in the first half of the nineties, sometimes in connection with training
material. A general distinction has been made between the content (ICB) and the organisation (responsibilities and procedures) of the certification programme.
From 1993 the IPMA Certification Core Team (CCT) was charged with the coordination and harmonisation of the national projects and achievements. A first agreement was elaborated to establish
an international framework for developing the national documents for the certification. In this process
the sunflower was used as an instrument for the harmonisation and finally as the logo for the ICB.
The emphasis is not on the ranges of project management competence but on the elements of project
management knowledge and experience.
In 1997 the IPMA Certification Validation Management Board (CVM Board) took over the further
developments and the co-ordination of the national associations qualification and certification programmes. In 1998 the IPMA Council accepted the standard agreement of the national association and
IPMA, approved the universal four level system and appointed the five members of the CVM Board.
The ICB was submitted to the National Associations as version 1.0 for comments in 1998 and then
published the first time by IPMA as version 2.0 in February 1999.
Introduction
B.
C.
Personal Attitude
D.
Taxonomy
E.
F.
Literature
The actual version of the ICB is in three languages: English, German and French. It was established
on the basis of the National Competence Baselines of APM (the U.K. Body of Knowledge), VZPM (the
Swiss Assessment Structure), PM-ZERT (the German Projektmanagement-Kanon) and AFITEP (the
French Assessment Criteria). From these National Competence Baselines as much elements as possible were adopted or slightly modified. In any case a high closeness of meaning was sought. For
traceability reasons the origin of each paragraph is clearly marked (numbers in brackets) and related
to the reference list.
The IPMA Competence Baseline is used as a reference basis for all substantial normative documents
for the IPMA validated certification programmes as well as for referencing of the project management
competence in theory and practice (e.g. project management literature, research projects, education,
training and continuing professional development and reports about the management of projects). The
ICB reflects the principles for the project management competence assessment that are commonly
accepted within the IPMA. By consequence, it influences, and is influenced, by developments on the
national competence baselines.
Each national association is responsible for establishing its own detailed documents for its certification, especially the National Competence Baseline (NCB). This documentation is valid for the certification. A certain freedom shall be available for including national cultures and the advancement of the
project management competence. On the other hand the IPMA harmonisation is responding to the
requirements of companies and organisations that are active internationally.
The ICB consists of 42 elements for knowledge and experience in project management (28 core
elements and 14 additional elements) as well as 8 aspects for personal attitudes and 10 aspects for
the general impression. IPMA requires that all 28 core elements and at least 6 additional elements
chosen by the nation as well as the aspects for personal attitudes and the general impression are
accepted in a NCB. However up to eight of the additional elements for knowledge and experience (i.e.
about 20% of the 42 elements) can be eliminated or replaced by new elements for taking the national
characteristics and new developments in project management into account.
Number of Certificates
First number in tables 5.1 to 5.4: new certificates. Second number: renewed certificates.
Numbers in italic letters are estimates.
5.1
IPMA Level A
Country
(nat. acssoc. / certif. body)
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Croatia (CAPM)
Czech Republic (SPR)
Denmark (FDP / Cert)
Finland (PR)
France (AFITEP)
1
0
Hungary (MFS)
Iceland (VSFI)
India (PMA)
Ireland (IPMI)
Italy (ANIMP / PM-Sect)
Latvia (LNPVA / Cert)
Macedonia (MAPM)
Netherlands (PMI-NL)
Poland (SPMP)
Portugal (APOGEP / Cert)
Russia (SOVNET-Cert)
Slovak Republic (SPMA)
Slovenia (ZPM / SLOCERT)
Spain (AEIPRO / OCDP)
Sweden (SPF)
Switzerland (SPM / VZPM)
23
5.2
IPMA Level B
Country
(nat. acssoc. / certif. body)
Austria (PMA / Zert.stelle)
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
18
27
41
29
16
27+6
35+7
45+5
30
Croatia (CAPM)
12
11
12
21
40
0
1
3
0
7
0
15
3
10
10
10
21
10
5+11
15+10
Finland (PR)
20
France (AFITEP)
Hungary (MFS)
10
Iceland (VSFI)
India (PMA)
1
0
0
0
20
Ireland (IPMI)
16
Poland (SPMP)
5
3
5
2
Russia (SOVNET-Cert)
Slovak Republic (SPMA)
10
0
4
0
4
6
6
10
Sweden (SPF)
20
10
13+4
21+6
29+4
30+10
2
(119)*
(10)**
10
Yugoslavia (YUPMA)
2
0
4+7
0
43
63
89
101
93
130
145
348
5.3
IPMA Level C
Country
(nat. acssoc. / certif. body)
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
81
132
150
136
600
40
10
50
65
65
90+5
Finland (PR)
51
70
France (AFITEP)
Germany (GPM / PM-ZERT)
24
10
20
16
26
20
15
24
73+0
80+10
20
Hungary (MFS)
Iceland (VSFI)
India (PMA)
10
Ireland (APPM)
150
14
5
10
Netherlands (PMI-NL)
16
Poland (SPMP)
Portugal (APOGEP / Cert)
10
Russia (SOVNET-Cert)
14
25
30
20
10
21
40
Sweden (SPF)
Switzerland (SPM / VZPM)
10
(94)* (100)**
17
26
44
49
237
533
1452
5.4
IPMA Level D
Country
(nat. acssoc. / certif. body)
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
57
73
77
100
33
200
35
20
30
0
9
11
40
30
50
Finland (PR)
France (AFITEP)
56
80
103
325
350
15
8
12
27
100
26
40
Ireland (APPM)
Italy (ANIMP / PM-Sect)
18
15
16
41
44
50
21
15
Russia (SOVNET-Cert)
36
50
15
31
42
40
50
13
11
86
(5300)* (2400)**
120
15
Yugoslavia (YUPMA)
20
102
315
834
1429
Certificated Individuals
per National Association
Country
Certification Body
First Assessors
PMA-Zertifizierungsstelle
PMRCC
Czech Republic
(SPPR)
(Nat. Assoc.)
Austria
(PMA)
China P.R.
(PMRC)
(CO SPR)
Denmark
(FDP)
Denmark
Egypt
MES PM-CERT
(MES)
(MPC)
Finland
(PMA)
Finland
France
PM-ZERT
(AFITEP)
Germany
(GPM)
Hungary
(MFS)
Management Profession
Hans Knoepfel
Excellence
Iceland
VSF-CB
(VSF)
India
(PMA)
in Project Management
Certification Body
First Assessors
Ireland
(IPMI)
Management of Ireland,
Certification
(Nat. Assoc.)
Gilles Caupin
Italy
(ANIMP)
agement, Certificazione
Netherlands
(PMI-NL)
Poland
SPMP-Cert
(SPMP)
Portugal
Conselho Nacional de
(APOGEP)
Certificao (CNC)
Russia
SOVNET Certification
(SOVNET)
Slovak Republic
(SPPR)
Slovenia
ZPM Certification
(ZPM)
(SLO-ZERT)
Klaus Pannenbcker
Spain
OCDP
(AEIPRO)
Sweden
Projektkraft i Norden AB
VZPM
UPMA Certification
(SPF)
Switzerland
(SPM)
Ukraine
(UPMA)
United Kingdom
Anatoly Rybak
APM Certification
(APM)
7.2
Country
Certification Body
Actual Assessors
PMA-Zertifizierungsstelle
(Nat. Assoc.)
Austria
(PMA)
China P.R.
PMRCC
Czech Republic
(SPPR)
(CO SPR)
Denmark
(FDP)
Denmark
John Ryding Olsson, Henrik Ejsing, Torben Johansen, Dainis Krastins, Torben Jrgensen, Peter
Snedker, Allan Rmeling, Eva Riis, Allan KrgerJensen, Sren Truelsen, John Thomsen
Egypt
MES PM-CERT
(MES)
(MPC)
Finland
(PMA Finland)
Finland
France
(AFITEP)
Certification Body
Actual Assessors
PM-ZERT
(Nat. Assoc.)
Germany
(GPM)
Iceland
Certification VSFI
(VSF)
India
(PMA)
in Project Management
Italy
(ANIMP)
agement, Certificazione
Netherlands
(PMI-NL)
A.J.G. Roermund, E. Burnaby Lautier, B.H. Hedeman, J. Hermarij, P.A. Hesselman, R.A.L. Noorden,
F.H.A. Quadflieg, R. van der Schoot,
J.H.M. Verhoeven, C. de Wilde, P.J. de Wit
Portugal
Conselho Nacional de
(APOGEP)
Certificao (CNC)
Russia
SOVNET Certification
(SOVNET)
Slovenia
ZPM Certification
(ZPM)
(SLO-ZERT)
Klaus Pannenbcker
Slovak Republic
SPPR Certification
(SPPR)
Spain
(AEIPRO)
Certification Body
Actual Assessors
(Nat. Assoc.)
Switzerland
(SPM)
Ukraine
UPMA Certification
(UPMA)
United Kingdom
Anatoly Rybak
Trained and nominated
APM Certification
(APM)
Certification Bodies
Country
Name
Address
Austria
PROJEKT MANAGEMENT
AUSTRIA e.V.
Zertifizierungsstelle
China P.R.
PMRC
Project Management
Research Committee
Certification
(PMRCC)
Croatia
Prkop
604 55 Brno
Tel. +420-5-41 644 138
Fax +420-5-45 42 71 45
E-mail lvrestal@centrum.cz
www.ipma.cz
Denmark
Sttedammen 4
DK-3400 Hillerd
Tel.: +45 4824 1488
Fax.: +45 4824 1489
www.projektforeningen.dk
E-mail: info@projektforeningen.dk
FDP
National Certification Board
Denmark
Egypt
Management Engineering
Society
Project Management
Certification
MES PM-CERT
(MPC)
Finland
PMA
National Certification Board
Finland
28 Ramsis street,
Cairo -Egypt
Tel: 5790050-5748169
Fax: 5790050-5740569
Website: http://www.ese.eg.net/manage_main.html
Email: rumes@rusys.eg.net
Managing Director:
Dr. Shawky El-Sabbagh
P.O. Box 132
FIN-02101 ESPOO
FINLAND
Contact person:
Dr. Kalle Kahkonen,
email Kalle.Kahkonen@vtt.fi
Country
Name
Address
France
AFITEP
Certification en Direction de
Projet (CDP)
17 rue de Turbigo
75002 Paris France
tl: 01 55 80 70 60
Fax: 01 55 80 70 69
E-mail:info@afitep.fr
Germany
PM-ZERT
(Zertifizierungsstelle der
GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft
fr Projektmanagement
e.V.)
Roritzerstrae 27
90419 Nuermberg
Phone +49 911 39 31 488
Fax
+49 911 39 31 487
Email: pm-zert@gpm-ipma.de
Internet: www.gpm-ipma.de
Hungary
Iceland
Verkefnastjornunarfelag
Islands Styrihopur vottunarmala (VSF-CB)
P.O.Box 8773
IS-128 Reykjavk
Tel. +00354 560 5518
Fax +00354 560 5600
E-mail vsf@vsf.is
Internet: www.vsf.is
India
A-48, Sector 5
NOIDA 201301
India
Tel. +91-118-4526673
Fax +91-116-464481
E-mail: acjain@vsnl.com
Ireland
Italy
ANIMP
Sezione di Project Management, Certificazione
Netherlands
PMI-NL
Project Certificatie Instituut
(PCI)
Poland
SPMP-Cert
Portugal
APOGEP
Conselho Nacional de
Certificao (CNC)
APOGEP
Conselho Nacional de Certificao
Av. Almirante Reis, 127 1 Dt
1150 LISBOA
PORTUGAL
E-mail ponces@mail.telepac.pt
President: Nuno Ponces de Carvalho
Country
Name
Address
Russia
SOVNET-Certification
Slovak
Republic
Bratislava, Radlinskho 11
E-mail: Lukac@aiten.sk
Slovenia
Spain
Asociacin Espaola de
Ingeniera de Proyectos
(AEIPRO).
Organismo Certificador en
Direccin de Proyectos
(OCDP)
Mara de Luna 3
50015 ZARAGOZA
Tel. +34-976-761910
Fax +34-976-762235/761861
E-mail aeipro@posta.unizar.es
www.aeipro.org
Sweden
Sdermannagatan 35
SE-116 40 STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN
Phone: +46 (0)8 462 91 20
Fax: +46 (0)8 462 91 98
E-mail catarina.meland@projektkraft.se
Switzerland
Flughofstrasse 50
CH-8152 Glattbrugg
Tel. +41-1-811-0817
Fax +41-1-810-2400
E-mail vzpm@vzpm.ch
www.vzpm.ch
Ukrne
UPMA Certification
(UPMA/Cert)
8 Dragomirova st.,
Kiev, Ukraine, 01103
Tel./fax +(38044) 268-21-49
Fax. +(38044) 290-05-89
Email: bush@upma.freenet.kiev.ua
Director UPMA/Cert,
Dr. Nataliya S. Bushuyeva
United Kingdom
Association of Project
Management (APM)
Certification
Yugoslavia
YUPMA Certification
IPMA Validation
9.1
Name
Country
Function
John Pyman
United Kingdom
Vice President
9.2
Name
Country
Function
Jacques Communier
France
Chairman
Sue Beavil
United Kingdom
Sergey Bushuyev
Ukraine
Hans Knoepfel
Switzerland
Olaf Pannenbcker
Germany
Brigitte Schaden
Austria
John Pyman
United Kingdom
9.3
Country
Lead Validator
Second Validator
Austria
Erhard Motzel
Hans Knoepfel
Germany
Hans Knoepfel
Egypt
Erhard Motzel
Jacques Communier
Switzerland
Klaus Pannenbcker
9.4
Country
Name
Function
Austria
Brigitte Schaden
Claudia Fehrerberger
National Representative
Roland Braustein
National Representative
Morten Fangel
National Representative
Finland
Juhani Silvasti
National Representative
France
Gilles Caupin
Jacques Communier
Denmark
Validator
Germany
Olaf Pannenbcker
Erhard Motzel
Hungary
Laszlo Karas
National Representative
Peter Tarnoky
National Representative
Iceland
Omar Imsland
National Representative
Italy
Paolo Sanvito
National Representative
Poland
Michal Halas
National Representative
Russia
Alexei Polkovnikov
National Representative
Slovak Republic
Eric Lukac
National Representative
Slovenia
Gorazd Cad
National Representative
Switzerland
Hans Knoepfel
Ukraine
Sergey Bushuyev
United Kingdom
Sue Beavil