DO Retrieved - Asp3

INTHECOURTOFMs.
ANUMALHOTRA
DISTRICT&SESSIONSJUDGE(WEST):DELHI
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
4014
RajeshShahi
278/14
Ranhola
498A/406/34IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
LearnedChiefProsecutorShriB.S.KainfortheState.
Ld.CounselShriP.C.Jhafortheapplicant.
Applicantispresentinperson.
Ld.counselfortheapplicanthassubmittedthephotocopyof
handingoverandtakingovermemodated17.10.2014inrelationtothe
dowryarticles.
TheIOofthecasenotbeingpresent,theSHOconcernedis
directed to explain the default in relation thereto especially also the
repeateddefaultsoftheInvestigatingOfficersofPSRanholainputtingin
appearance,onthenextdateofhearing.
Thematterberenotifiedon22.11.2014onwhichdatethe
StatusReportbytheIOintermsoforderdated09.10.2014bealsoputup
andtheinterimordershallcontinuetillthatdate.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
District&SessionsJudge(West)
Delhi/15.11.2014
INTHECOURTOFMs.ANUMALHOTRA
App.No.
8128
Smt.SonuSurivs.Smt.SomaSuri
CCNo.
12077/1/12
PS:
RajouriGarden
U/s:
323/380/448/506IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselShriDavinderKumarfortheapplicant
Ms.SonuSuri.
TheapplicationbeingonefiledbyMs.SonuSuri,oneoftheco
accusedintheinstantcase,grantedbailvideorderdated07.06.2012ofthethen
Ld.DistrictJudge&ASJIncharge(West),subjecttotheconditionsasimposed
thereby,wherebytheapplicantseeksmodificationofthesaidorder.
Theapplicantisnotpresentinpersontodayandisnotpresent
despitenotices.However,intheinterestofjustice,takingthegravityofthe
matterthattheapplicantisnotallowedtoenterherownhome,Courtnoticeto
CounselMr.G.L.GoswamiandMr.Balrajforthenonapplicantbeissuedand
alsototheapplicantthroughtheIOofthecaseforthedate02.12.2014.
Thematterberenotifiedon02.12.2014.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
8501
BholaNath
714/14
PaschimVihar
498A/34/406IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
Applicantispresentinperson.
Ld.CounselSh.AnilPruthiforthecomplainant.
ItissubmittedbyLd.counselforthecomplainantthatthe
matter is pending before the Mediation Centre and is now fixed for
18.11.2014.
Inviewthereof,thematterberenotifiedfor05.12.2014till
whichdatetheinterimordershallcontinue.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
8672
BakshiAnand
408/12
UttamNagar
420IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselShriNarenderKumarfortheapplicant.
IO/SIAmitKumarinperson.
ShriGauravGandhi,Counselforthecomplainantispresent
and has submitted his memorandum of appearance. He has further

submittedthatthecomplainant,whohasreceivednoticeofthehearing,is
unable to put in appearance due to an injury. It has further been
submittedonbehalfofthecomplainantthatthechequeofRs.1,75,000/
givenbytheaccusedSudhirGahloton28.10.2014tothecomplainanthas
sincebeenencashed.
The Counsel present on behalf the complainant does not
opposethebailapplicationasthematterissettledbetweentheparties
andthattheoffencepunishableu/s420IPCiscompoundablewiththe
permissionoftheCourt,inviewthereof,asthecoaccusedintheinstant
Contd.....
2
BailApp.No.
8672
15.11.2014(Contd....)
matter is on bail in terms of order dated 31.10.2014, on a parity of

reasoning,theapplicantisallowedtobereleasedonbail,intheeventof
hisarrest,onfurnishingofabailbondinthesumofRs.OneLakhwith
onesuretyinthelikeamountwiththedirectionsthatheshalljointhe
investigationofthecaseasandwhenrequiredandshallnotattemptto
tamperwiththeevidence.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailAppNo.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
9284
Shakeel@Kallu@Dada
1210/14
RajouriGarden
363IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselSh.MaheshRanjanfortheapplicant.
Ld.CounselSh.ShubhamAsreforthecomplainant.
IO/ASIAbhinandaninperson.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
9304&9305
1.Vikas@Praveen
2.Vishal@Rohit
1105/14
RajouriGarden
324/308/452/34IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselShriU.K.Girifortheapplicants.
SIMohinderSinghonbehalfofIO/ASIKaramveeris
present.
Noticewasissuedtothecomplainanttobepresentinperson
today.
Asperthereportreceived,thecomplainantisincustodyin
FIRNO.1143/14PSTilakNagar.
ProductionwarrantsbeissuedtotheSuperintendent(Jail),
Delhiforproductionofthecomplainanton17.11.2014,specifyingthatthe
complainantisnotincustodyinFIRNo.1105/14PSRajouriGarden.
Thematterberenotifiedon17.11.2014tillwhichdatethe
interimordershallcontinue.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
9309
Mohd.Shakir
934/14
UttamNagar
394/34IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselShriA.K.Dubeyfortheapplicant.
Argumentsaddressedonbehalfoftheeitherside.
MLCoftheinjuredhasbeenputupbytheIO.
Onbehalfoftheapplicant,ithasbeensubmittedthatthe
applicanthasbeenfalselyimplicatedinthepresentcaseandthatthere
wasaquarrelbetweenthepartiesaspertheavermentsmadeintheFIR.
Itisfurthersubmittedonbehalfoftheapplicantthatthecomplainant
thereafter apologized to the family members of the applicant. It has
further beensubmitted thattherehas beenadelayof oneandahalf
month in the arrest of the applicant bringing forth the falsity of the
allegationsagainsttheapplicant.Afurthersubmissionhasbeenmadeon
behalfoftheapplicantthattheapplicantisincustodyforthelastoneand
Contd.....
2
BailApp.No.
9309
15.11.2014(Contd....)
a half month and no useful purpose would be served by further
incarcerationoftheapplicantandthatthereisnorecoverythathasbeen
effected during the police remand having been availed off by the
InvestigatingAgency.Afurthersubmissionhasbeenmadeonbehalfof
theapplicantthatevenduringtheperiodfromthedateofregistrationtill
thearrestoftheapplicant,therehasbeennocommissionofoffenceby
the applicant. Reliance interalia has been placed, on behalf of the
applicant,duringthecourseofsubmissionsmadeon14.11.2014onthe
verdictoftheHon'blePunjab&HaryanaHighCourtinthejudgment
reportedasAIR1958Punjab123(V45C33)inRaoHarnarainSingh
SheojiSingh&Orsvs.TheStatetocontendthatpreviousimplications
oughtnottosufficetograntthebail.
On behalf of the State, the bail application has been
vehementlyopposed,submittinginteraliatotheeffectthattheapplicant
hasassaultedthecomplainant/injuredwithaknife.
TheMLCproducedbytheIOshowsthatthecomplainant
wasinaninebriatedstatewithpassivemodeandtherewasaninjuryover
themedialaspectofthemidthighofthecomplainant.
Contd.....
3
BailApp.No.
9309
15.11.2014(Contd....)
Asregardstherelianceplacedbytheapplicantontheverdict
oftheHon'blePunjab&HaryanaHighCourt,theverdictreliedupon
itselfspecificallyputsforththattherecanbenoinflexibilityintherules
governingtheaspectofthebail.
TakingintoaccounttheallegationsmadeintheFIRandthe
CDsofthecasesinwhichtheapplicantisallegedlyinvolvedunderthe
ArmsActandincasesu/s392/379/452/324/506/427/34IPCinthearea
ofPSUttamNagari.e.fiveothercasesapartfromthepresentcase,there
isnogroundforgrantofbail.Theapplicationisrejected.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
9310
PuneetMadan@Sam
213/12
PaschimVihar
336IPCr/w30ArmsAct
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselSh.DeepakGhaifortheapplicant.
IO/SIHariPrakashinperson.
ItisinformedbytheIO,inreplytoaspecificCourtquery,
thattheweaponofoffenceisinpossessionofthepoliceinthemalkhana.
AspertheavermentsintheFIRitself,thearmwasalicensedarmand
usedforallegedfiringintheair.
TheotheroffencesallegedarebailableinnatureandSection
25ofArmsActisstatedtohavebeenaddedatasubsequentinvestigation
on finding out that the license itself was fake. The investigation in
relationtheretoisstatedtobeinprogress.Therearenopreviousadverse
antecedentsagainsttheapplicantandaspertheavermentsmadeinthe
FIR,theapplicantwasfoundinpossessionofalicensedarm.
Contd.....
2
BailApp.No.
9310
15.11.2014(Contd....)
Taking the same into account, in the event of arrest, the
applicantisallowedtobereleasedonbailonfurnishingabailbondin
the sum of Rs.One Lakh with one surety in the like amount to the
satisfactionofIO/SHOconcernedwiththedirectionthatheshallnot
leavethecountrywithoutthepermissionoftheCourtandshallnotmake
anattempttotamperwiththeevidence.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
9491
AjayBanga
1179/14
RajouriGarden
315/308/506/498A/406/34IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselSh.PujyaKumarSinghfortheapplicant.
Applicantispresentinpersonpursuanttothedirectiondated
14.11.2014.
Ld.CounselShriVipinKumarAnandforthecomplainant
withthecomplainant.
IO/SIManoharLalinperson.
ReportsubmittedonbehalfoftheState.
Partsubmissionsmadeonbehalfoftheeitherside.
During the course of submissions made on behalf of the
applicant,ithasbeensubmittedthattheapplicanthasbeencalledtotheCAW
Cell on 20.11.2014 which aspect is not in the knowledge of the IO. The
verificationinrelationtheretobeputupbytheIOonthenextdateofhearing.
The matter be renotified on 19.11.2014 till which date, the
applicantbenotarrestedsubjecttohisnotleavingDelhiandnotintimidating
thewitnesses.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
9495
Rohit
788/14
Khyala
323/354/354B/452/506/509109/34IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselShriS.K.Sharmafortheapplicant.
Ld.CounselShriAvnishSharmaforthecomplainant.
IO/SIYadRaminperson.
Pursuanttoproceedingsdated14.11.2014whenaffidavitof
thecomplainantwassubmittedtoindicatethatshehascompromisedthe
matterwiththeapplicant/accusedthroughtherespectablepersonsofthe
society.Inviewofthefactumthatthestatementofthecomplainantu/s
164 Cr.P.C. recorded previously which was categorically against the
applicant,videorderdated14.11.2014,shewasdirectedtobeproduced
bytheIObeforetheLd.CourtofACMM(West)forrecordingofher
statementu/s164Cr.P.C.whichappearstohavebeenassignedbyLd.
ACMM(West)totheLd.CourtofMs.SaumyaChauhan,MM(West),
Delhi.
Contd.....
2
BailApp.No.
9495
15.11.2014(Contd....)
The statement of the complainant u/s 164 Cr.P.C. dated
14.11.2014iscategoricaltotheeffectthatshehassettledthematterand
thatshedoesnotwanttoproceedwiththecasefurther.
InreplytoaspecificCourtquerytothecomplainant,who
hasbeendulyidentifiedbytheIOofthecaseasbeingthecomplainantof
thiscase,thecomplainanthasstatedthatshehasvoluntarilyarrivedata
settlementwiththeapplicant/accusedanddoesnotwanttoproceedwith
thecasefurther.
Takingintoaccountthesaidsubmissionofthecomplainant
and her statement u/s 164 Cr.P.C. dated 14.11.2014, despite the
submissionmadeonbehalfoftheStatethattheapplicantisaBCofthe
area,quaFIRNO.788/14,theapplicantisallowedtobereleasedonbail
onfurnishingabailbondinthesumofRs.50,000/withtwosuretiesin
thelikeamounttothesatisfactionofLd.MM/Ld.LinkMM/Ld.Duty
MM,withdirectionsthatheshallnotintimidatethewitnessesinany
manner,heshalljointheinvestigationofthecaseasandwhenrequired
and he shall not involve himself in commission of any offence
whatsoever.
Contd.....
3
BailApp.No.
9495
15.11.2014(Contd....)
IntheeventoftherebeinganyFIR,registeredagainstthe
applicant,theStateisdirectedtofiletheStatusReportinrelationthereto
beforethisCourt.
Furthermore, copy of this order be sent to Ld. ACMM
(West)withdirectionthatintheeventoffuturedirectionofthisCourt,
directingtheACMM(West)torecordthestatementu/s164Cr.P.C.,the
sameberecordedbyACMM(West)himselforherselfandnottoassign
itfurthertoanyotherCourt.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
9500
Statevs.
SachinKapoor
FIRNo.
768/14
PS:
PunjabiBagh
U/s:
392/397/34
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselShriMaharajSinghfortheapplicant.
IO/ASIJileSinghinperson.
Requisitionedchargesheethasbeenreceivedandperused.
Argumentsaddressedonbehalfofeitherside.
Taking into account, the factum that the chargesheet has
beenfiledintheinstantmatter,norecoveryhasbeeneffectedfromthe
applicantandthattheapplicantisstatedtobeaged27yearswithno
previousadverseantecedents,theapplicantisallowedtobereleasedon
bail on furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.One Lakh with two
suretiesinthelikeamounttothesatisfactionofLd.MM/Ld.DutyMM/
Ld. Link MM, with the directions that he shall not intimidate the
witnessesinanymanner.
Requisitionedchargesheetbereturned.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
9523
NageshSingh
492/14
Ranhola
498A/406/34IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselShriR.B.Singhfortheapplicant.
Ld.CounselShriRajenderGuptaforthecomplainant.
IO/SISIDineshinperson.
InreplytoaspecificCourtquery,itisinformedbytheIOas
alsomentionedinthereportsubmittedthatsofar,thereisnopermission
toarresttheapplicant.
Inviewthereof,intheeventofarrest,noticeofsevendays
be issued to the applicant with the direction that he shall join the
investigationasandwhenrequired.
CopyoforderbegivenDasti,asprayed.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
9532
ManSingh@Monu
945/14
RajouriGarden
392/411/34IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselShriSatishKumarfortheapplicant.
IO/SIGurcharaninperson.
Ld.counselfortheapplicanthassubmittedthatthecharge
sheetintheinstantcasehasbeenfiledandthesameberequisitioned.
In view thereof, the chargesheet be requisitioned for
17.11.2014forwhichdate,thematterberenotified.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
9534
ManishSonkar
841/14
Khyala
323/336/427/452/34IPC&25/27ArmsAct
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselShriManjeetSinghfortheapplicant.
IO/SIYadRaminperson.
Onbehalfoftheapplicant,ithasbeenstrenuouslyurgedthat
theapplicanthasbeenfalselyimplicatedinthepresentcaseandthathe
hasnoroletoplayinthecommissionoftheallegedoffenceandthatthe
offencespunishableu/s323/336/427ofIPC,1860arebailableandthat
thereisnooffence made out qua the offence punishable u/s 452 IPC
whichisalsonotrefutedbytheState.
Asregardstheallegedcommissionoftheoffencepunishable
u/s25ArmsAct,1959,itissubmittedonbehalfoftheStatethatthereare
categorical averments in the FIR against the applicant of being in
possessionofthearm.
Contd....
2
BailApp.No.
9534
15.11.2014(Contd....)
Thespecificallegationinrelationtopossessionofarmby
eachofthethreeindividualsallegedlyHarish,ManishandDheerajisnot
statedintheFIRperse.
TheIOsubmitsthattheinvestigationisyetinprogress.Itis
submittedonbehalfoftheapplicantthathissisteristobemarriedon
03.12.2014.
As the matter is still in progress and in view of the
submissionmadeonbehalfoftheapplicant,theapplicantisallowedto
bereleasedoninterimanticipatorybailtill08.12.2014subjecttohis
filingabailbondinthesumofRs.OneLakhwithonesuretyinthe
like amount to the satisfaction of IO/ SHO concerned with the
directionsthatheshallnotleavethecountrywithoutthepermission
of the Court and shall put an appearance before the Court on
09.12.2014.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
9535&9536
1.VarunAggarwal
2.VarinderAggarwal
3.RamlaAggarwal
4.Deepshika
ComplaintNo.
PS:
U/s:
650/14
CAWCell,KirtiNagar(West)
498A/406/34IPC
15.11.2014
Videthiscommonordertwoanticipatorybailapplications
oftheabovenamedfourapplicantsarebeingdisposedoff.
Present:
Ld.CounselShriC.L.Guptafortheapplicants
Ld.CounselSh.ChangezKhanforthecomplainant.
InquiryOfficerInspectorAshaBadolainperson.
InreplytoaspecificCourtquery,itisinformedbytheIO
thatpermissiontoarresttheapplicantshasyetnotbeenreceived,theFIR
being not yet registered. The Inquiry Officer also informed that the
applicantsarejoiningtheinquiryproceedings.
Contd.....
2
BailApp.No.
9535&9536
15.11.2014(Contd....)
Inviewthereof,intheeventoftheirarrest,noticeofseven
days be issued to the applicants subject to their joining the inquiry
proceedingsandnotleavingthecountry.
CopyoforderbegivenDasti,asprayed.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
9541
TarifAhmad
1182/14
UttamNagar
397/34IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselShriA.K.Dubeyfortheapplicant.
ReportsubmittedonbehalfoftheState.Takenonrecord.
Asubmissionhasbeenmadeonbehalfoftheapplicantthat
thecoaccusedintheinstantcaseisonbailwhichisnotrefutedbythe
IO.TheorderinrelationtheretobeputupbytheLd.counselforthe
applicanton18.11.2014onwhichdate,thematterberenotified.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
9542
SandeepChauhan@Poni
1136/14
RajouriGarden
307IPC
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.CounselShriMurariTiwarifortheapplicant.
IO/SIMohinderSinghinperson.
Onbehalfoftheapplicant,ithasbeenstrenuouslyurgedthat
theapplicanthasbeenfalselyimplicatedinthepresentcaseandthatheis
incustodysince21.10.2014andthattheinvestigationinthepresentcase
isvirtuallycompleteandthattherehavebeenpreviousincidentsbetween
theapplicantandthecomplainantandthattheapplicanthadinfacteven
gotregisteredanFIRbearingNo.608/13PSRajouriGarden,inrelation
towhich,therewasnoarrestmadeofthecomplainantofthepresentcase
whoistheaccusedinthatcaseandthatfurthermore,itwasbecause,the
applicantdeclinedtowithdrawtheFIRNo.608/13PSRajouriGarden
Contd....
2
BailApp.No.
9542
15.11.2014(Contd....)
thatthepresentFIRhasbeenlodgedasacounterblasttothesame.Itis
further submitted on behalf of the applicant that the complainanthas
severalothercasesagainsthim.
OnbehalfoftheState,theapplicationhasbeenvehemently
opposed,submittinginteraliatotheeffectthattheapplicantistheperson
whoallegedlyassaultedthecomplainantwiththeknifeonhisabdomen.
The State has also put up the copy of the MLC of the complainant,
submittinginteraliatotheeffectthattheresultisyettobereceived.
Withoutanyobservationonthemeritsordemeritsofthe
case, taking into account the injury inflicted on the abdomen of the
complainantwithasharpedgedweaponandalsotheimpactoftheinjury
wherebythebowelsoftheinjuredareindicatedtohavecomeout,there
existsnogroundwhatsoeverforgrantofbail.Theapplicationisrejected.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
BailApp.No.
Statevs.
FIRNo.
PS:
U/s:
9543&9544
1.KiranChopra
2.AshokChopra
Notknown
CAWCell,KirtiNagar(West)
498A/406IPC
15.11.2014
Videthiscommonordertwoanticipatorybailapplications
oftheabovenamedtwoapplicantsarebeingdisposedoff.
Present:
Ld.CounselShriVivekGaurfortheapplicant.
Ld.CounselMs.PoonamBakshiforthecomplainant.
EnquiryOfficerASIMahenderSinghinperson.
The Inquiry Officer has informed that the applicants are
joiningtheinquiryproceedings.
It is submitted on behalf of the complainant that the
allegationsagainsttheapplicantsaregrave.
Presently, as the FIR is yet to be registered and the
applicantsarejoiningtheinvestigation,thematterbeingone
Contd....
2
BailApp.No.
9543&9544
15.11.2014(Contd....)
emanating from a matrimonial dispute qua which counsel for
complainant made a submission previously that the complainant was
intendingtosettlethematterbutthesettlementhasnotbeenarrivedat
andmaynotbelikely,intheeventofarrestoftheapplicants,noticeof
seven days be issued to them subject to their joining the inquiry
proceedings and not intimidating the witnesses and not leaving the
country.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
12:45PM
At this stage, Ms. Poonam Bakshi, Ld. counsel for the
complainantseeksthatacopyoftheordertobegivenDasti.
Thesamebegiven,asprayed.
(ANUMALHOTRA)
Delhi/15.11.2014
CRNo.34/14
SaritaVs.State&Ors.
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.counselSh.MukulSharmafortheapplicant.
Thematterhasbeentakenupinviewofdetailssubmittedon
behalf of the applicant of the CR petition bearing no.84/14 titled as

JitenderDabasVs.State,statedtobependingbeforetheld.CourtofASJ
(FTC)West,therecordofwhichberequisitionedforthedate19.11.2014
andbeputupwiththeCRNo.34/14.
(AnuMalhotra)
THC/Delhi/15.11.2014
GP.No.42/12
SoniaVs.State
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.counselSh.R.P.Srivastavaforthepetitioner.
Respondentno.1arrayedonrecordisaproformaparty.
Respondentno.2isalreadyexparte.
Part testimony of the petitioner has been recorded. Court
noticetoSmt.KrishnaRani,Wifeof Sh.KewalKishanasperparticulars
mentioned in the MarkC be issued, process returnable for the date
29.11.2014. The petitioner will also file the affidavit qua the present
addressoftheKrishnaRanionthenextdateofhearing.
(AnuMalhotra)
TPNo.83/14
StateVs.Vibha&Ors
15.11.2014
Present:
None fortheapplicantsSmt.Vibha,Sh.SantoshKumar
andSmt.MuraliDevi.
Ld.ChiefProsecutorShriB.S.KainfortheState.
TransferpetitionNo.83/14isfiledbytheapplicantsSmt.
Vibha,Sh.SantoshKumarandSmt.MuraliDeviseekingtransferofthe
bailapplicationfromtheld.CourtofASJ05(West)totheld.Courtof
ASJ03 (West). Though, the application is dated 10.10.2014, it is
indicatedtohavebeenfiledon10.09.2014asperthestampoftheFiling
Section andalsoaspertheendorsementbeneaththetransferpetition
numberputupas83/14on11.09.2014anditisalsoindicatedtohave
been so filed in the month of September with the proceedings dated
11.09.2014 15.09.2014, 24.09.2014, 25.09.2014, 30.09.2014 before this
Court.
Videorderdated30.09.2014,thereportoftheFilingSection
in relation to bail applications of the three applicants was called for.
Placedonrecordisorderdated25.09.2014ofthisCourt inrelationto
the bail application no.7459, 7460 and 7461 of the applicants Smt.
Vibha,Sh.SantoshKumarandSmt.MuraliDeviinFIRNo.156/2014PS
NihalVihar.Inviewthereof,theTransferPetitionno.83/14callsforno
furtheractionasthebailapplicationshavealreadybeendisposedofby
2
TPNo.83/14
StateVs.Vibha&Ors
thisCourt.
The Transfer Petition No.83/14 is thus disposed of
accordingly and the file be consigned to the Record Room and the
recordsofBailSectionbereturned.
(AnuMalhotra)
RCANo.61/13
SohanLalvs.MCD
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.counselShriVinayKumarfortheappellant.
Ld.counselShriMohitSharmafortherespondent.
Replytotheapplicationdated15.05.2014oftheappellant
has been submitted on behalf of the respondent, copy of which is

indicatedtohavebeensuppliedon14.11.2014.
Time is sought on behalf of the appellant to address the
arguments.
Thematterbethusrenotifiedforargumentson09.12.2014.
(AnuMalhotra)
TPNo.88/14
ChanchalWadhwavs.AjayWadhwa&Anr.
15.11.2014
Present:
Applicantinperson.
The applicant submits that the records of ld. ASJ (FTC)
(West)arelistedbeforethisCourtforthedate01.12.2014.
Beforeproceedingfurther,thesaidrecordsbeputuponthe
date19.11.2014.
(AnuMalhotra)
MHANo.08/08
KiranMehravs.State
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.counselShriMukulSharmaforthepetitioner.
ShriAnoopKapoorinperson.
Ld.counselShriG.L.GoswamiforSarlaKapoorand
AnoopKapoor.
Pursuanttodirectionsdated21.07.2014intermsofSection
50(2)oftheMentalHealthAct1987,thereportwascalledforfromthe
Director,IHBASquaascertainmentofmentalstatusofAnoopKapoor
afterexaminationonanydaybetween28.07.2014to14.08.2014.Areport
dated 05.09.2014 has been received from IHBAS alongwith another
reportdated29.08.2014andthereisalsoplacedonrecordareportdated
19.09.2014 of the Director, IHBAS and Chairman of Medical Board,
whichisplacedontherecord.
It is considered appropriate as both counsel present for
eithersidesubmitthattheyhavenotperusedthereportsputforthbythe
IHBASandtheymayinspectthesamefromthejudicialrecordandthe
matterberenotifiedforconsiderationon03.12.2014.
(AnuMalhotra)
ARCTNo.13/13
SatishKumarVs.Vinod&Anr.
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.counselMs.Namitafortheappellant.
Ld. counsel Sh. Jitender Arya for the respondent no.2
submitsthathewouldsubmitthedetailsofthelegalrepresentativesof
the respondent no.1 in writing. The same be submitted on the date
19.11.2014, on which date, the details of the account number of the
respondentno.2bealsosubmittedforcomplianceofthedirectionsfor
depositofrent.
Thematterberenotifiedon25.11.2014.
(AnuMalhotra)
TPNo.48/14
M/sRaghunandanSaranAshokSaran,HUF
Vs.
M/sPearyLalWorkshop(P)Ltd.
15.11.2014
Present:
Sh.AshokSaran,Kartaofthepetitionerno.1ispresent.
Submissionshavebeenmadeonbehalfofthepetitionerin
writingplacingrelianceontheverdictoftheHon'bleSupremeCourtof
thecaseVivekanandanNidhiVs.AsheemaGoswami(2000)10SCC23.
Before proceeding further, it is considered appropriate to hear the
petitionerbeforedecidingastowhetherornotnoticeofthepetitionisto
beissued.
The petitioner submits that he would need an hour. The
petitionermaycrystallizehispointsandsubmitwrittensubmissionsin
briefnotexceedingfivepagesineachcaseandthematterberenotified
forconsiderationon20.12.2014at3.00PM.
(AnuMalhotra)
TPNo.49/14
Vs.
15.11.2014
Present:
beissued.
(AnuMalhotra)
TPNo.42/14
Vs.
15.11.2014
Present:
beissued.
(AnuMalhotra)
CSNo.446/13
SBIVs.YogeshwarMehto
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.counselSh.S.C.Bhasinfortheplaintiff.
Ld.counselSh.MohitSharmaproxyforSh.Dharamvirfor
thedefendant.
Itissubmittedonbehalfoftheplaintiffthattherearesome
talksofsettlementinprogress.
Thereplyoftheplaintifftotheapplicationofthedefendant
underSection151CPCbefiledandthematterberenotifiedforreplyand
argumentson17.12.2014.
(AnuMalhotra)
SCNo.18/13
FIRNo.329/13
StateVs.LianKhanMang
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.ChiefProsecutorShriB.S.KainfortheState.
Ld.counselSh.R.S.Chauhanfortheaccusedispresent.
Accusedonbail.
ItissubmittedonbehalfoftheStatethattheDoctorshave
declined to give the results in relation to the MLC No.15772 of the

injuredSuanLianPauasthecomplainanthasnotbeenproduced.The
InvestigatingOfficerofthecaseisnotpresent.
TheInvestigatingOfficerwiththereportoftheDoctorsis
directedtobepresentonthedate10.12.2014,forwhichdate,thematter
berenotifiedforconsiderationofcharge.
(AnuMalhotra)
TPNo.62/14
RajeshVs.State
15.11.2014
Present:
None.
Alettervidediaryno.54787wasreceivedon09.07.2014of
theapplicantseekingtransferoftheproceedingspendingbeforethethen
Ld.CivilJudge05(West)intheofficeofLd.District&SessionsJudge
(HQs)andwasreceivedinthisCourton16.07.2014afterproceedings
conducted.Videorderdated16.07.2014,thesaidletterwasdirectedtobe
treated as a transfer petition vide order of the undersigned and the
judicialrecordsofCSNo.78/13weredirectedtoberequisitionedforthe
date 01.08.2014. The said records have been put up on the dates
01.08.2014, 16.08.2014, 05.09.2014, 17.09.2014, 14.10.2014, when none
hasbeenpresentonbehalfoftheapplicant.Theundersignedwasalsoon
leaveonthesaiddates.ThejudicialrecordsofCS78/14thenpending
beforetheld.CourtofCivilJudge05(West)indicatethatthesaidsuit
has already been disposed of on 19.07.2014. The Transfer Petition
No.62/14 be thus consigned to the Record Room as having become
infructuous.ThejudicialrecordofCS78/14bereturned.
(AnuMalhotra)
TPNo.98/14
KulwantSinghvs.InderpreetSingh
15.11.2014
Present:
Petitionerinpersonwithld.counselShriS.N.Kalraand
Ms.JyotiSharma.
Letthepetitionbecheckedandregistered.
Inviewofreportdated11.11.2014oftheNaibNazironthe
applicationdated11.11.2014oftheld.CourtofMs.RubyNahar,Civil
Judge (West) to the effect that the said ld. Court is on leave and
furthermore, in view of the official record of ld. District & Sessions
Judge(West),whichindicatethatthesaidld.Courtisonlongleave,the
application dated 11.11.2014 filed by the applicant/petitioner seeking
depositofrentiswithdrawnfromthesaidld.Courtandassignedtothe
ld.CourtofShriSameerBajpai,JSCCcumAddl.SCJ(West),before
whom,theapplicationbeplacedonthedate21.11.2014at2.00PM.
TheTransferPetitionNo.98/2014isdisposedofaccordingly
andbeconsignedtotheRecordRoom.
(AnuMalhotra)
ARCTNo.08/14
RamBhajVermavs.VijaySingh
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.counselShriI.R.Singhfortheappellant.
Ld.proxycounselShriK.K.Sharmaforld.counselShri
P.K.Srivastavafortherespondent.
Thecounselfortheappellanthassubmittedthetruecopyof
the orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in relation to another

Evictionpetitionbetweenthepartiesandithasbeeninteraliasubmitted
onbehalfoftheappellantthatthepossessionofthetenantedpremises
washandedovertotheappellantbytherespondenton07.11.2014butthe
duesinrelationtheretohavenotbeenpaidandtheappellantalsoseeks
directionstotherespondenttomakethepaymentoftherentdue.
Certified copies of orders of the Hon'ble High Court of
Delhi be submitted by the appellant and furthermore, the parties are
directedtobepresentinpersonon02.12.2014.
(AnuMalhotra)
CANo.7/12
RaviNarangvs.VarunAnand
15.11.2014
Present:
Ld.counselShriDilipSinghfortheappellant.
Ld.counselShriPankajJainfortherespondent.
Writtensubmissionsofeithersidenotexceedingfivepages
besubmittedwithinaperiodoftwoweekswithadvancecopythereof
being supplied interse and the matter be renotified for arguments on
20.12.2014.
(AnuMalhotra)
CSNo.299/12
SurjitSinghvs.RajinderKaur
15.11.2014
Present:
Plaintiffinpersonwithld.counselShriAmarjitSingh
Sahni.
Defendantinpersonwithld.proxycounselShriBhadurifor
ld.counselShriTanvirKhan.
PW2JagjeetSinghispresent.Inviewofhisstatementmade
today, his testimony has been deferred and the affidavit Ex. DW2/A
cannot be read as the testimony of the witness. In the event of the
defendantwantingtoproducethewitnessJagjeetSinghasawitnessin
thewitnessbox,inviewofthesubmissionmadebythedefendantthathe
does not know English but knows Hindi, the affidavit of the witness
JagjeetSinghbefiledinHindiwithacopythereofbeingsuppliedtothe
plaintiff with a translated version in English being also filed on the
recordandacopythereofbeingsuppliedtotheplaintiff.
The matter be renotified for defendant's evidence on
20.12.2014.
(AnuMalhotra)

DO Retrieved - Asp3

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

DO Retrieved - Asp3

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

INTHECOURTOFMs.

and has submitted his memorandum of appearance. He has further

matter is on bail in terms of order dated 31.10.2014, on a parity of

behalf of the applicant of the CR petition bearing no.84/14 titled as

has been submitted on behalf of the respondent, copy of which is

declined to give the results in relation to the MLC No.15772 of the

the orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in relation to another

Вам также может понравиться