Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Penis
2.1
the androgen receptors results in the differentiation of the genital tubercle, genital (labioscrotal)
folds, and genital swelling between 9 and 13
weeks of gestation into the male structures of the
glans penis, penile shaft, and scrotum, respectively [1].
The male develops in a proximal to distal
manner. As the penis forms from the elongation
and enlargement of the phallus, the lateral walls
of the urethral groove form from the ventrally
located genital folds. The genital folds then
fuse in the midline. The glanular urethra forms
from the ingrowth of surface epithelium, but this
long-held theory has been challenged with evidence suggesting that it is due to the fusion of
the urethral plate. The scrotum forms through
the inferomedial migration and midline fusion
of the genital folds as delineated by the scrotal
raphe. In females and in males with abnormalities in testosterone and/or dihydrotestosterone
production, 5-reductase deficiency, or androgen receptor insufficiency, the genital tubercle,
genital folds, and genital swellings passively
become the clitoris, labia minora, and labia
majora, respectively.
Congenital penile or scrotal anomalies can be
isolated variations of external genitalia development, or they can represent significant underlying
malformations. Prompt diagnosis and potential
surgical planning are essential to allay the anxieties of parents as well as to identify other potentially clinically significant conditions. Congenital
M.A.B. Fahmy (ed.), Rare Congenital Genitourinary Anomalies: An Illustrated Reference Guide,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-43680-6_2, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015
penile anomalies have been shown to be increasing in incidence. The weighted incidence of
anomalies including hypospadias has increased
from 7 of every 1,000 newborns (19881991) to
8.3 of every 1,000 newborns (19972000), but
this may be a result of increased reporting.
Multiple etiologies in abnormal development
have been proposed, including genetic, hormonal, and environmental influences. Whereas
molecular pathology has aided in the identification of key steps in abnormal development, modern imaging techniques continue to refine the
evaluation and treatment of such anomalies [2].
2.2
Penis
Nomenclature
Etiology
2.2
Fig. 2.4 Aphallia with absent testicles and only skin covering the urethral opening
Classications
10
Penis
2.3
Microphallus
11
surrounds the timing, role, and the necessity of gender reassignment. The long-accepted notion regarding the presence of a phallus or phenotypic phallic
growth potential should not be the major criterion in
recommending gender reassignment.
2.3
Microphallus
Nomenclature
Micropenis
Denition
Mean SD
2.5 0.4
3 0.4
3.9 0.8
4.3 0.8
4.7 0.8
5. 1 0.9
5.5 0.9
5.7 0.9
6 0.9
6.1 0.9
6.2 1.0
6.3 1.0
6.3 1.0
6.4 1.1
13.3 1.6
Mean-SD
1.5
2.0
1.9
2.3
2.6
2.9
3.3
3.5
3.8
3.9
3.7
3.8
3.8
3.7
9.3
12
Historical Note
Micropenis results from a multiplicity of endocrine and nonendocrine conditions. The most
common etiologies include hypogonadotropic
hypogonadism, hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, and idiopathic micropenis [14].
In hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, secretion
of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)
by the hypothalamus is impaired. This leads to
decreased pituitary secretion of luteinizing
hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone,
depriving the testis of its stimulus to secrete
testosterone. This pathogenesis exists in some
hypothalamic dysfunctions, such as Kallmann
syndrome or PraderWilli syndrome.
Micropenis secondary to hypergonadotropic
hypogonadism is associated with conditions
in which the testes are impaired functionally
and unable to respond to hypothalamicpituitary stimulation; an example of this condition
is gonadal dysgenesis.
In so-called idiopathic micropenis, endocrine
analysis demonstrates a normal hypothalamic
Penis
2.4
Megalopenis
2.4
13
Megalopenis
Denition
Etiology
14
Penis
2.5
Denition
Denition
2.5
15
Etiology
16
Penis
Treatment
Treatment must be individualized with consideration of the associated anomalies with the goal of
attaining a satisfactory functional and cosmetic
result.
2.6
Penile Deviation
Nomenclature
Historical Background
Congenital curvature is rare, and there is no evident cause; lateral penile curvature usually is
caused by overgrowth or hypoplasia of one
2.7
Penile Chordee
corporal body. A single study analyzing the ultrastructure of the tunica albuginea demonstrated
widening and fragmentation of collagen fibers,
with complete disappearance of striation and
transformation into electron-dense, fibrous, granulated material and elastin accumulation. Although
the glans may be directed more than 90 from the
midline, the orientation of the corporal bodies and
the corpus spongiosum at the base of the penis is
normal. Hemihypertrophy of a corpus cavernosum
and its accompanying thickened tunica albuginea,
with or without contralateral concomitant hypoplasia (rudimentary corpus), is responsible for the
lateral deviation in congenital curvature of the
penis. Rarely, penile deviation is accompanied by
penile torsion. Although the deformity generally is
not severe enough to preclude sexual intercourse,
it can be a source of great concern to the patient
and may cause him to avoid sexual contact, and in
the younger age the baby and the family may be
troubled by the abnormal urinary stream instigated
by deviation (Fig. 2.19).
One-hundred-and-eighty-degree malrotation
of the penis is a common finding in Fraser syndrome [26].
Management
In general, the defect has primarily cosmetic significance, and correction is unnecessary if it is
17
2.7
Penile Chordee
Congenital chordee is caused by reduced elasticity in one or more of the fascial layers of the
penis, leading to shortness of the corpus spongiosum when erection occurs. The bend is usually
ventral but could be dorsal or complex.
Nomenclature
18
Penis
Fig. 2.20 Penile chordee with ventral bending not associated with any other urethral anomaly
Fig. 2.22 Ventral penile curvature with deficient corpus
spongiosum and superficial urethra
Management
Etiology
2.8
Webbed Penis
Nomenclature
There is no accurate figure about the exact incidence of webbed penis, but Rudin and Osipova
presented the largest series on webbed penis;
19
This condition should be differentiated from hidden penis which is an acquired condition where
20
Penis
2.9
Penoscrotal
Transposition (PST)
History
Nomenclature
2.9
21
Glenn and Anderson have classified the abnormality into the following categories, according to severity: bifid scrotum, incomplete or partial penoscrotal
transposition, complete penoscrotal transposition
or prepenile scrotum, and ectopic scrotum [39].
After reviewing of 63 cases, we adopted
another classification, taking into consideration
the minor cases and whether it is unilateral or
bilateral, and a new category of reverse migration
of the scrotum away from the peniscaudally it
was given the name caudal scrotal migration:
Major
Complete (Fig. 2.26)
Incomplete (Fig. 2.27)
Minor
Unilateral (asymmetrical) (Fig. 2.28)
Bilateral (symmetrical)
Central median penile scrotalization
(Fig. 2.29)
Caudal scrotal regression (wide penoscrotal
distance) (Fig. 2.30)
Associated Anomalies
PST is a rare heterogeneous anomaly, the detection of which should warrant careful clinical evaluation to rule out other anomalies, especially of
the urinary system, gastrointestinal tract, upper
limbs, craniofacial region, and central nervous
system. PST may be a localized field defect involving the genitourinary system with major renal
anomalies which include complete agenesis of the
urinary system, unilateral or bilateral renal agenesis, polycystic or dysplastic kidneys, horseshoe
kidney, ectopic pelvic kidney, and obstructive
uropathy. Genital abnormalities include a disproportionately long flaccid penis, complete urethral
atresia, and hypospadias.
22
Penis
Management
Incidence
2.10
Denition
2.10
23
24
Penis
2.11
Penile Lymphedema
Fig. 2.39 Pearly penile papules in the median raphe
Nomenclature
Penile lymphedema (Fig. 2.40) is an uncomfortable and potentially disfiguring disorder. It may
be congenitally inherited (15 %), in either an
autosomal dominant form (Milroys disease), a
sporadic form (in 85 % of the cases) that
occurs at puberty (Meigs disease), or
25
2.12
Penile Cysts
Incidence
Fig. 2.41 Scrotal lymphedema
Management
26
Penis
2.13
Megameatus
Denition
Description
27
Management
2.14
28
Penis
asymptomatic boy with suspected meatal stenosis actually has a compliant meatus of normal
caliber. If the meatus is diminished in size or if
the child has abnormal voiding symptoms, a renal
and bladder ultrasound examination is indicated.
If the child has a history of UTIs, a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) should be done also.
However, meatal stenosis rarely causes obstructive changes in the urinary tract. In boys with
UTIs, it is often uncertain whether the infection
is the result of meatal stenosis.
In many cases, meatoplasty can be accomplished in the physicians office using EMLA
cream for local anesthesia. In addition, 1 %
lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine may be
infiltrated in the ventral web with a 26 gauge
needle for local anesthesia and vasoconstriction. A ventral incision is made toward the frenulum and long enough to provide a meatus of
normal caliber, which can be checked with the
bougie. The urethral mucosa is sutured to the
glans with fine chromic catgut sutures. If the
procedure is performed under general anesthesia, the bladder may be filled with saline and
compressed manually to be certain that the
stream is straight.
Litvak et al. [50] performed a cohort study and
demonstrated that a boy younger than 10 years of
age should have a meatus of at least 8 French,
while boys 1112 years of age should accommodate
at least 10 French (Fig. 2.52). Simple urethral dila-
29
2.15
Nomenclature
Etiology
30
Penis
References
Embryology and Penile Development
1. Yiee JH, Baskin LS. Penile embryology and anatomy.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2010;10:11749.
2. Nelson CP, Park JM, Wan J, et al. The increasing incidence of congenital penile anomalies in the United
States. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 2):15736.
Microphallus
11. Tuladhar R, Davis PG, Batch J, Doyle
LW. Establishment of a normal range of penile length
in preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health. 1998;34:471.
12. Calderon JS, Zarante I. ANOMALAS CONGNITAS
UROLGICAS: Descripcin EPIDEMIOLGICA Y
FACTORES DE Riesgo ASOCIADOS EN COLOMBIA
20012004. Arch Esp Urol. 2006;59(1):714.
13. Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. An updated review of
environmental estrogen and androgen mimics and
antagonists. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol.
1998;65(16):14350.
14. Williams-Ashman HG, Reddi AH. Differentiation of
mesenchymal tissues during phallic morphogenesis
with emphasis on the penis: role of androgens and
other regulatory agents. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol.
1991;39:87381.
15. Wisniewski AB, Migeon CJ, Gearhart JP, et al.
Congenital micropenis: long-term medical, surgical
References
and psychosexual follow-up of individuals raised
male or female. Horm Res. 2001;56(12):311.
16. Bin-Abbas B, Conte FA, Grumbach MM, Kaplan
SL. Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and
micropenis: effect of testosterone treatment on adult
penile size. Why sex reversal is not indicated. J
Pediatr. 1999;134(5):57983.
17. Husmann DA. The androgen insensitive micropenis:
long- term follow-up into adulthood. J Pediatr
Endocrinol Metab. 2004;17(8):103741.
18. Lee PA, Houk CP. Outcome studies among men with
micropenis. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2004;17(8):
104353.
Megalopenis
19. NALPN A, URAN N, GRAY , ERAL
D. Inversion of chromosome 15 in a family with
benign familial infantile seizures. J Neurol Sci [Turk].
2008;25:0558.
20. Sabry MA, Obenbergerova D, Al-Sawan R, Al Saleh
Q, et al. Femoral hypoplasia-unusual facies syndrome
with bifid hallux, absent tibia, and macrophallus: a
report of a Bedouin baby. J Med Genet. 1996;
33:1657.
31
Penile Chordee
28. Smith CK. Surgical procedures for correction of
hypospadias. J Urol. 1938;40:239.
29. Caesar RE, Caldamone AA. The use of free grafts for
correcting penile chordee. J Urol. 2000;164(5):
16913.
Webbed Penis
30. Rudin IE, Osipova AI. Experience of surgical treatment of webbed penis in children. Urologiia. 2003;
2:3641.
31. Brisson P, Patel H, Chan M, Feins N. Penoplasty for
buried penis. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:412.
32. Bergeson PS, Hopkin RJ, Bailey Jr RB, et al. The
inconspicuous penis. Pediatrics. 1993;92:794.
Penile Deviation
25. Verneuil. Torsion congenitale du penis avec hypospadias. Bullerin de la Socete de Chirurgie de Paris.
1857;8:6870.
26. Darewicz B, Kudelski J, Szynaka B, Nowak HF,
Darewicz J. Ultrastructure of the tunica albuginea in
congenital penile curvature. J Urol. 2001;166:
17668.
27. Kogan BA. Intraoperative pharmacological erection
as an aid to pediatric hypospadias repair. J Urol.
2000;164:2058.
32
Penis
Penile Lymphedema
Penile Cysts
47. LaNasa JA. Epidermal cyst of median raphe. Urology.
1976;8(4):4012.
Megameatus
48. Hadidi AT. Classification of hypospadias. In: Hadidi
AT, Azmy AF, editors. Hypospadias surgery: an illustrated guide. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2004. p. 80.
Suggested Reading
Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J Urol. 1994;152:414.
Baskin LS, Erol A, Li YW, Liu WH. Anatomy of the
neurovascular bundle: is safe mobilization possible?
J Urol. 2000;164:97780.
Casale AJ, Beck SD, Cain MP, et al. Concealed penis in
childhood: a spectrum of etiology and treatment.
J Urol. 1999;162:11658.
Husmann DA. The androgen insensitive micropenis:
long- term follow-up into adulthood. J Pediatr
Endocrinol Metab. 2004;17(8):103741.
Walsh PC, Wilson JD, Allen TD et al. Clinical and endocrinological evaluation of patients with congential
microphallus. J Urol. 1978; 120:90-5.
http://www.springer.com/978-3-662-43679-0